The efficacy of tolvaptan as a diuretic for chronic kidney disease patients

Tolvaptan ameliorated kidney function for one elderly autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease patient: A case report

BACKGROUND

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a genetic disorder characterized by the growth of numerous cysts within the kidneys. Disease progress of some patients often occurs at the early stage. Thus, managing and controlling disease progress is important to slow the kidney function decline especially for the patient with other disorders.

CASE SUMMARY

One 80-year-old male autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) patient with chronic kidney disease and other clinical disorders was treated with tolvaptan and edoxaban. Estimated glomerular filtration rate, creatinine and uric acid were monitored during the treatment. In addition, the whole exome sequencing was performed to screen ADPKD genetic variants. The kidney function decline was prevented after using tolvaptan and edoxaban treatment and in the meantime, a venous thromboembolism was removed and leg and pedal edema were alleviated. One mutation c.10102G>A /p.D3368N in the PKD1 gene was identified.

CONCLUSION

Tolvaptan combined with edoxaban administration could delay kidney function decline and eliminate the edema caused by the thromboembolism.

Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy with Tolvaptan and Furosemide in Children with Nephrotic Syndrome and Refractory Edema: A Prospective Interventional Study

OBJECTIVE

Severe edema in children with nephrotic syndrome is often refractory to conventional diuretics. Tolvaptan has been used satisfactorily for managing edema in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis. The safety and efficacy of combination therapy with oral tolvaptan and intravenous (IV) furosemide was assessed in patients with furosemide refractory edema.

METHODS

Patients, aged 5-18 y with nephrotic syndrome and severe edema, were screened for eligibility. After excluding hypovolemia, patients received IV furosemide (3-4 mg/kg/d) for 48 h. Those refractory to IV furosemide (weight loss < 3%) received tolvaptan (0.5-1 mg/kg once daily) and IV furosemide for the next 48 h. Parameters were compared between 48 h of furosemide alone and combination therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients (18 boys) with mean age of 8.0 ± 3.0 y were enrolled. Urine volume significantly increased with combination therapy as compared to furosemide therapy (mean difference: 1.2 mL/kg/h; 95% CI: 0.8-1.65 mL/kg/h) (p < 0.001). Compared to therapy with furosemide alone, combination therapy resulted in significant reduction in body weight from 26.9 ± 10.3 kg to 24.8 ± 9.7 kg (p < 0.001). Estimated glomerular filtration rate did not change (p = 0.81) but serum sodium increased from 135.7 ± 3.3 mEq/L to 140.4 ± 4.8 mEq/L (p < 0.001) with combination therapy; 2 patients showed asymptomatic hypernatremia.

CONCLUSION

The combination of oral tolvaptan and IV furosemide is effective in augmenting diuresis and reducing weight in patients with furosemide refractory edema but requires monitoring of electrolytes and volume status.

Chronic renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: A new frontier in hepatology

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with liver cirrhosis has become a new frontier in hepatology. In recent years, a sharp increase in the diagnosis of CKD has been observed among patients with cirrhosis. The rising prevalence of risk factors, such as diabetes, hypertension and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, appears to have contributed significantly to the high prevalence of CKD. Moreover, the diagnosis of CKD in cirrhosis is now based on a reduction in the estimated glomerular filtration rate of < 60 mL/min over more than 3 mo. This definition has resulted in a better differentiation of CKD from acute kidney injury (AKI), leading to its greater recognition. It has also been noted that a significant proportion of AKI transforms into CKD in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. CKD in cirrhosis can be structural CKD due to kidney injury or functional CKD secondary to circulatory and neurohormonal imbalances. The available literature on combined cirrhosis-CKD is extremely limited, as most attempts to assess renal dysfunction in cirrhosis have so far concentrated on AKI. Due to problems related to glomerular filtration rate estimation in cirrhosis, the absence of reliable biomarkers of CKD and technical difficulties in performing renal biopsy in advanced cirrhosis, CKD in cirrhosis can present many challenges for clinicians. With combined hepatorenal dysfunctions, fluid mobilization becomes problematic, and there may be difficulties with drug tolerance, hemodialysis and decision-making regarding the need for liver vs simultaneous liver and kidney transplantation. This paper offers a thorough overview of the increasingly known CKD in patients with cirrhosis, with clinical consequences and difficulties occurring in the diagnosis and treatment of such patients.

Antidiuretic Hormone and Serum Osmolarity Physiology and Related Outcomes: What Is Old, What Is New, and What Is Unknown?

CONTEXT

Although the physiology of sodium, water, and arginine vasopressin (AVP), also known as antidiuretic hormone, has long been known, accumulating data suggest that this system operates as a more complex network than previously thought.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

English-language basic science and clinical studies of AVP and osmolarity on the development of kidney and cardiovascular disease and overall outcomes.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Apart from osmoreceptors and hypovolemia, AVP secretion is modified by novel factors such as tongue acid-sensing taste receptor cells and brain median preoptic nucleus neurons. Moreover, pharyngeal, esophageal, and/or gastric sensors and gut microbiota modulate AVP secretion. Evidence is accumulating that increased osmolarity, AVP, copeptin, and dehydration are all associated with worse outcomes in chronic disease states such as chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, and heart failure. On the basis of these pathophysiological relationships, an AVP receptor 2 blocker is now licensed for CKD related to polycystic kidney disease.

CONCLUSION

From a therapeutic perspective, fluid intake may be associated with increased AVP secretion if it is driven by loss of urine concentration capacity or with suppressed AVP if it is driven by voluntary fluid intake. In the current review, we summarize the literature on the relationship between elevated osmolarity, AVP, copeptin, and dehydration with renal and cardiovascular outcomes and underlying classical and novel pathophysiologic pathways. We also review recent unexpected and contrasting findings regarding AVP physiology in an attempt to explain and understand some of these relationships.

Hyponatraemia in heart failure

Hyponatraemia is common in heart failure (HF). It is estimated that over 20% of patients admitted to hospital with HF have hyponatraemia. It has also been repeatedly shown to be a surrogate marker of increased morbidity and mortality in this specific population. This review focuses on the pathophysiology of hyponatraemia through the activation of neurohormonal cascades in HF, the clinical implications of sustained hyponatraemia and treatment options in the management of this challenging phenomenon.

Impact of renal function on mid-term outcomes in heart failure patients treated with tolvaptan

Background:

Although tolvaptan, an electrolyte-free water diuretic for congestive heart failure (HF), is reported to have no effect on long-term mortality or HF-related morbidity, there may exist some subgroups of patients who may receive beneficial effect of tolvaptan. The purpose of this study was to identify clinical factors associated with mid-term effect of tolvaptan on clinical outcomes of patients who discharged after acute HF.

Methods:

We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients (88 male; mean age, 77.1 ± 11.0 years) with acute HF who received tolvaptan (initial dose 8.6 ± 3.6 mg/day) during their hospitalization. They were divided into two groups according to how the tolvaptan was used at discharge; 77 in the tolvaptan-continued group and 63 in the discontinued group.

Results:

The Cox proportional hazards model revealed that eGFR was the only independent predictor for the occurrence of mid-term cardiac events (composite of re-hospitalization due to HF and all-cause death; aHR = 0.9870, p = 0.02597). The Kaplan–Meier survival curves of the two groups demonstrated no difference in cumulative event-free rates. In the subgroup with preserved renal function at admission (eGFR ⩾ 30 ml/min/1.73 m²), the continuous use of tolvaptan increased composite events (aHR = 2.130, p = 0.02549).

Conclusions:

The continuous use of tolvaptan after discharge did not affect mid-term cardiac events of HF overall but may be associated with increased cardiac events in the subgroup with preserved renal function. These findings suggest that the tolvaptan administration might need to be limited to treatment of in-hospital acute HF.

Efficacy of Long-Term Treatment With Tolvaptan to Prolong the Time Until Dialysis Initiation in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Heart Failure

The short-term effectiveness of tolvaptan (TLV) against heart failure has been established. TLV is known to decrease the worsening of renal function more than loop diuretics. Long-term TLV administration decreases the rate of re-hospitalization in heart failure and prevents deterioration of kidney function. If repeated hospitalization for heart failure can be prevented in patients having concurrent chronic kidney disease (CKD), the period until dialysis initiation may be prolonged. We investigated whether long-term TLV management can extend the period until dialysis initiation in patients with CKD and heart failure. A retrospective, observational study was conducted among patients with CKD stage G4 and G5 admitted because of heart failure between April 2013 and July 2018. They were divided into those with TLV and those without TLV. They were followed up until August 2018 and relevant data was collected. Data from 115 patients (68 men and 47 women), with a mean age of 73.4 ± 11.9 (median 76.0 and IQR 66.5-82.0) years and a mean eGFR of 11.8 ± 5.7 (median 9.9 and IQR 7.5-14.8) mL/min/1.73m² were included in the analysis. Twenty-five patients had received long-term TLV treatment, and 90 had not. Multivariate analysis after adjustment showed that long-term use of TLV significantly lowered the hazard ratio (HR) for time taken to reach dialysis initiation (HR: 0.3286, 95%CI: 0.1282-0.8423, P = 0.0205). Propensity score-matched analysis showed similar results (HR: 0.3220, 95%CI: 0.1107-0.9369, P = 0.0376). In patients with CKD G4 and G5 and heart failure, long-term treatment with TLV can prolong the time until dialysis initiation.

Tolvaptan rescue contrast-induced acute kidney injury: A case report

RATIONALE

Contrast-induced acute kidney injury is one of the most serious adverse effects of contrast media and is related to three distinct but interacting mechanisms: medullary ischemia, formation of reactive oxygen species and direct tubular cell toxicity, especially in the patients with chronic kidney disease. The strategies of treatment, including stabilization of hemodynamic parameters and maintenance of normal fluid and electrolyte balance, were similar to the management of other types of acute kidney injury.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 58-year-old woman experienced acute oligouria after complex percutaneous coronary intervention for multiple vessel coronary artery disease.

DIAGNOSES

Chest radiography showed pulmonary congestion and hyponatremia was noted after fluid hydration for suspicious contrast-induced nephropathy.

INTERVENTIONS

Oral tolvaptan, at 15mg per day, was used for three days.

OUTCOMES

Urine output increased gradually and symptoms relieved one day later after using tolvaptan. Serum creatinine also improved to baseline level one week later after this event.

LESSONS

Here, we reported an interesting case about contrast-induced acute kidney injury and hypervolemic hyponatremia, where tolvaptan was used to rescue the oliguric phase. Tolvaptan could be considered to use for contrast-induced acute kidney injury and had possibility of prevention from hemodialysis. Larger studies are still needed to investigate the role of tolvaptan in rescuing the oliguric phase in contrast-induced acute kidney injury.

Tolvaptan for Heart Failure in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Heart failure (HF) is frequently associated with renal impairment. Tolvaptan is reported to be effective in treating congestion in HF without significant electrolyte loss compared to conventional diuretics. However, the safety and efficacy of its use in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety outcomes of tolvaptan for HF management in patients with CKD, with a focus at a physiologic basis related to safety.

METHODS

We searched for observational studies and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that assessed the effects of tolvaptan against placebo or standard care in adult patients with HF and CKD. Our protocol was registered with PROSPERO (number CRD42017052775).

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the qualitative review and six in the meta-analysis involving 1597 patients. Tolvaptan was associated with an increase in sodium concentration. No significant differences in change of eGFR and serum creatinine were found between tolvaptan and control groups. Urine flow rate appears to increase significantly with tolvaptan compared to baseline (p<0.0001). The meta-analysis demonstrated no heterogeneity between studies but the possibility of publication bias due to incomplete reporting in excluded studies and lack of RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety profile of tolvaptan appears acceptable for patients with HF and CKD. There is evidence for an improvement in serum sodium and reduction in body water without deterioration in renal function. Further research is needed to elucidate the long-term benefits of tolvaptan as an adjunct or alternative to diuretics in such patients.

Cardiorenal Syndrome: Role of Arginine Vasopressin and Vaptans in Heart Failure

Heart and kidney failure continued to be of increasing prevalence in today's society, and their comorbidity has synergistic effect on the morbidity and mortality of patients. Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) is a complex disease with multifactorial pathophysiology. Better understanding of this pathophysiological network is crucial for the successful intervention to prevent advancement of the disease process. One of the major factors in this process is neurohormonal activation, predominantly involving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) and arginine vasopressin (AVP). Heart failure causes reduced cardiac output/cardiac index (CO/CI) and fall in renal perfusion pressures resulting in activation of baroreceptors and RAAS, respectively. Activated baroreceptors and RAAS stimulate the release of AVP (non-osmotic pathway), which acts on V₂ receptors located in the renal collecting ducts, causing fluid retention and deterioration of heart failure. Effective blockade of AVP action on V₂ receptors has emerged as a potential treatment option in volume overload conditions especially in the setting of hyponatremia. Vasopressin receptor antagonists (VRAs), such as vaptans, are potent aquaretics causing electrolyte-free water diuresis without significant electrolyte abnormalities. Vaptans are useful in hypervolemic hyponatremic conditions like heart failure and liver cirrhosis, and euvolemic hyponatremic conditions like syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone secretion. Tolvaptan and conivaptan are pharmaceutical agents that are available for the treatment of these conditions.

Effects of tolvaptan in patients with chronic kidney disease and chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Tolvaptan, a vasopressin V₂ receptor blocker, has a diuretic effect for patients with heart failure. However, there were a few data concerning the effects of tolvaptan in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 21 patients with chronic heart failure and CKD. Tolvaptan was co-administered with other diuretics in-use, every day. We compared clinical parameters before and after the treatments with tolvaptan. Furthermore, we examined the correlations between baseline data and the change of body weight.

RESULTS

Tolvaptan decreased the body weight and increased the urine volume (p = 0.001). The urine osmolality significantly decreased throughout the study period. Urinary Na/Cr ratio and FENa changed significantly after 4 h, and more remarkable after 8 h (p = 0.003, both). Serum creatinine increased slightly after 1 week of treatment (p = 0.012). The alteration of body weight within the study period correlated negatively with the baseline urine osmolality (r = -0.479, p = 0.038), the baseline urine volume (r = -0.48, p = 0.028), and the baseline inferior vena cava diameter (IVCD) (r = -0.622, p = 0.017). Hyponatremia was improved to the normal value, and the augmentations of the sodium concentration were negatively associated with the basal sodium levels (p = 0.01, r = -0.546).

CONCLUSIONS

Tolvaptan is effective in increasing diuresis and improved hyponatremia, even in patients with CKD. The baseline urine osmolality, urine volume, and IVCD may be useful predictors for diuretic effects of tolvaptan.

Different Effects of Tolvaptan in Patients with Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy with Nephrotic Syndrome

This case report discusses the clinical indication for immunosuppressants in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN). Because this disease occasionally shows spontaneous remission, it is necessary to determine the predictive values for a therapeutic effect in order to provide appropriate treatment. Two distinct cases described herein illustrate the different effects of tolvaptan in responders and non-responders, according to the pre-treatment levels of AQP-2 immunostaining in the samples from renal biopsy and urinary levels of AQP-2 and osmolality, suggesting that these values may be useful predictors of response to tolvaptan in patients with nephrotic IMN.

Urine Aquaporin-2: A Promising Marker of Response to the Arginine Vasopressin Type-2 Antagonist, Tolvaptan in Patients with Congestive Heart Failure

Aquaporin-2, a member of the aquaporin family, is an arginine vasopressin-regulated water channel expressed in the renal collecting duct, and a promising marker of the concentrating and diluting ability of the kidney. The arginine vasopressin type-2 antagonist, tolvaptan, is a new-generation diuretic; it is especially indicated in patients with decompensated heart failure refractory to conventional diuretics. However, the ideal responders to tolvaptan have not yet been identified, and non-responders experience worse clinical courses despite treatment with tolvaptan. Urine aquaporin-2 has recently been demonstrated as a promising predictor of response to tolvaptan. We here validated aquaporin-2-guided tolvaptan therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure. Long-term efficacy of tolvaptan treatment in the responders defined by aquaporin-2 needs to be validated in the future prospective study.

Dual Impact of Tolvaptan on Intracellular and Extracellular Water in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients with Fluid Retention

Objective Tolvaptan, an oral selective V2-receptor antagonist, is a water diuretic that ameliorates fluid retention with a lower risk of a worsening renal function than conventional loop diuretics. Although loop diuretics predominantly decrease extracellular water (ECW) compared with intracellular water (ICW), the effect of tolvaptan on fluid distribution remains unclear. We therefore examined how tolvaptan changes ICW and ECW in accordance with the renal function. Methods Six advanced chronic kidney disease patients (stage 4 or 5) with fluid retention were enrolled in this study. Tolvaptan (7.5 mg/day) added to conventional diuretic treatment was administered to remove fluid retention. The fluid volume was measured using a bioimpedance analysis device before (day 0) and after (day 5 or 6) tolvaptan treatment. Results Body weight decreased by 2.6%±1.3% (64.4±6.5 vs. 62.8±6.3 kg, p=0.06), and urine volume increased by 54.8%±23.9% (1,215±169 vs. 1,709±137 mL/day, p=0.03) between before and after tolvaptan treatment. Tolvaptan significantly decreased ICW (6.5%±1.5%, p=0.01) and ECW (7.5%±1.4%, p=0.02), which had similar reduction rates (p=0.32). The estimated glomerular filtration rate remained unchanged during the treatment (14.6±2.8 vs. 14.9±2.7 mL/min/1.73² m, p=0.35). Conclusion Tolvaptan ameliorates body fluid retention, and induces an equivalent reduction rate of ICW and ECW without a worsening renal function. Tolvaptan is a novel water diuretic that has a different effect on fluid distribution compared with conventional loop diuretics.