Biological effects of progestins in breast cancer

Progestogens for treatment and prevention of pregnancy disorders

Progesterone appears to be the dominant hormone not only establishing a proper secretory endometrial development but also adequate decidualization to establish pregnancy and sustain pregnancy development. Progesterone is the natural immunoregulator to control the maternal immune system and not to reject the allogeneic fetus. There are two sources of progesterone: corpus luteum first and placenta later. Three progestogens can be used in pregnancy: (i) progesterone (per os, intravaginal and intramuscular), (ii) dydrogesterone (per os), and (iii) 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate (intramuscular). There are three indications, for which these progestogens can be clinically used either for treatment or prevention: (i) first trimester threatened and recurrent (habitual) abortion, (ii) premature labor/premature birth, and (iii) pre-eclampsia (hypertension in pregnancy). The available data are limited and only partially randomized. In threatened abortion the use of progesterone, dydrogesterone and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate leads to a significant improved outcome, when at the time of threatened abortion a viable fetus has been ascertained by ultrasound. For prevention of recurrent abortion there are also some data indicating a significant effect compared with women without progestogen treatment. Prevention of preterm birth by progestogens (progesterone vaginally, orally and 17α-hydroxyprogesterone caproate intramuscularly) was significantly effective. The main study groups include pregnant women with a previous history of premature birth. However, also in women with shortened cervix use of progesterone seems to be helpful. The studies done so far in women with risk factors for pre-eclampsia or established pre-eclampsia were based on parenteral progesterone application. However, new studies are urgently needed.

Subchorionic hemorrhage treatment with dydrogesterone

The objective of the study was to evaluate the efficacy of progestogenic therapy for the prevention of spontaneous abortions in patients with subchorionic hemorrhage. One hundred pregnant women with bleeding and ultrasonographic evidence of subchorionic hematoma were treated with oral dydrogesterone 40 mg/day. Only cases in which the embryo was viable were included. The follow-up included ultrasonography and intravaginal examination. Of the 100 pregnancies, 93 had a favorable evolution with maintenance of pregnancy. The abortion rate was therefore 7%. This compares with an abortion rate of 18.7% obtained in a previous study in women with subchorionic hematoma treated with micronized progesterone. The abortion rate was therefore reduced by up to 37% with dydrogesterone, as most cases had large-volume hematomas at the first visit and thus a poor prognosis. In conclusion, the marked immunomodulatory effect of dydrogesterone in maintaining a T helper-2 cytokine balance means that it is a good choice for preventing abortion in women suffering from subchorionic hemorrhage.

A Novel Antiestrogenic Mechanism in Progesterone Receptor-transfected Breast Cancer Cells

The expression of progesterone receptor (PR) is normally estrogen-dependent, and progesterone is only active in target cells following estrogen exposure. This study revealed that the effect of estrogen was markedly disrupted by estrogen-independent expression of PR. Transfection of PR in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7 cells abolished the estradiol-17beta growth stimulatory effect that was observed in the parental cells and the vector-transfected controls in a ligand-independent manner. The antiestrogenic effect was also observed at the level of gene transcription. Estradiol-17beta (E2)-induced gene expression of pS2 and GREB1 was impaired by 50-75% after 24-72 h of E2 treatment in PR-transfected cells. Promoter interference assay revealed that PR transfection drastically inhibited E2-mediated ER binding to estrogen response elements (ERE). The antiestrogenic effects of transfected PR are associated with enhanced metabolism of E2. HPLC analysis of [3H]E2 in the samples indicated that the percentage of [3H]E2 metabolized by PR-transfected cells in 6 h is similar to that by vector-transfected control cells in 24 h (77 and 80%, respectively). The increased metabolism of E2 may, in turn, be caused by increased cellular uptake of E2, as demonstrated by whole cell binding of [3H]E2. The findings open up a new window for a hitherto unknown functional relationship between the PR and ER. The antiestrogenic effect of transfected PR also provides a potential therapeutic strategy for estrogen-dependent breast cancer.

[Actions of a 19-norprogesterone derivative on mammary gland: nomegestrol acetate]

As the biological effects of progestins vary according to their molecular structure, it becomes essential to differentiate the various types of progestins, particularly with regard to the breast.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this review was to gather published data on the effects of a 19-norprogesterone derivative, nomegestrol acetate, on the breast. Materials and methods. All experimental and clinical published studies reporting data in the literature on nomegestrol acetate and breast were reviewed.

RESULTS

In experiments on steroid receptors, it was shown that nomegestrol acetate presents a high binding specificity and affinity for progesterone receptors, notably in normal and cancerous human breast tissues. It sharply inhibits synthesis of progesterone receptors in hormone-dependent T-47D human breast cancer cells grown in an estrogenic culture medium, thereby demonstrating its strong progestational activity. On the other hand, it does not bind to estrogen receptors and lacks any estrogenic potential, confirmed by the lack of induction of alkaline phosphatase activity of endometrial Ishikawa cells. Estrogen-induced synthesis of estrogen receptors is also inhibited by nomegestrol acetate, a major determinant of its strong intrinsic anti-estrogenic activity. Unlike androgenic progestins (e.g. 19-nortestosterone derivatives and medroxyprogesterone acetate) which may act indirectly on the breast by inducing modifications of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I), nomegestrol acetate is devoid of any androgenic activity. In studies carried out on the effects of progestins on enzyme activities involved in estradiol (E2) formation in breast tissue, nomegestrol acetate can control E2 levels in breast cancer tissue in vitro: it inhibits estrone sulfatase activity that converts estrone sulfate (E1S) to estrone (E1) and inhibits 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity that converts E1 to E2, resulting in blockade of E2 bioformation in MCF-7 and T-47D human breast cancer cells. It also stimulates sulfotransferase activity and subsequently the transformation of non conjugated estrogens E1 and E2 into biologically inactive estrogen sulfates. In vitro studies on cell proliferation have demonstrated that nomegestrol acetate, on the one hand, is unable to stimulate proliferation of MCF-7 cells cultured in a medium devoid of estrogens and, on the other hand, can exert antiproliferative effects on T-47D cells grown in an estrogenic environment. Furthermore, studies on mammary apoptosis have shown that the withdrawal of nomegestrol acetate induces apoptosis peak of normal human breast epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo. In clinical trials carried out with premenopausal women, nomegestrol acetate administered in antigonadotropic sequence has demonstrated its efficacy in the treatment of cyclical mastodynia and early onset benign breast diseases. With postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) combining estrogen and nomegestrol acetate, clinical trial results showed low incidence of mastodynia while under treatment as well as moderate increase in mammographic density, particularly with continuous combined regimens, however rapidly reversed by a short-term suspension of HRT. Noclinical data with this progestagen is available on breast cancer risk.

CONCLUSION

In addition to efficacy on mastodynia, in vitro and in vivo study results support the good tolerance of nomegestrol acetate on breast, in the short and medium term.

An overview of nomegestrol acetate selective receptor binding and lack of estrogenic action on hormone-dependent cancer cells

The specific pharmacological profile of the 19-norprogestin nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) is, at least in part, defined by its pattern of binding affinities to the different steroid hormone receptors. In the present study, its affinity to the progesterone receptor (PgR), the androgen receptor (AR) and the estrogen receptor (ER) was re-evaluated and compared to those obtained for progesterone (P) and several progestins. The characteristics of binding to the PgR in rat uterus were determined and Ki were found to be roughly similar with 22.8 and 34.3 nM for NOMAC and P, respectively. The binding characteristics of 3H-NOMAC were also determined and compared to that of 3H-ORG2058 with Kd of 5 and 0.6 nM, respectively for rat uterus and 4 and 3 nM, respectively for human T47-D cells. Structure-affinity and -activity relationships were studied on a variety of compounds related to NOMAC in order to assess its specificity as a progestin. The effects of NOMAC on the binding of androgen to the AR were investigated, using rat ventral prostate as target model. Contrary to what was observed for MPA, the RBA of NOMAC was found to decline with time, showing anti-androgenic rather than androgenic potential, a result that was confirmed in vivo. Regarding the ER, since none of the progestins were able to compete with estrogen for binding in rat uterus as well as in Ishikawa cells, the induction of alkaline phosphatase activity (APase) was used as an estrogen-specific response. It confirmed the intrinsic estrogenicity of progestins derived from 19-nor-testosterone (19NT), norethisterone acetate (NETA), levonorgestrel (LNG) or norgestimate (NGM) and others. In contrast, all P and 19-norP derivatives remained inactive. Finally, to complete this overview of NOMAC at the sex steroid receptor levels, the lack of estrogenic or estrogenic-like activity was checked out in different in vitro models. Data from this study have demonstrated that NOMAC is a progestin that has greater steroid receptor selectivity compared to MPA or some other synthetic progestins. It may provide a better pharmacological profile than those progestins currently in use in HRT and OC.

Estrogen and progesterone up-regulate glucose transporter expression in ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells

Breast cancer incidence increases in women receiving combined estrogen and progesterone therapy. Breast tumors show increased expression of the glucose transporter GLUT1. We determined the effect of these hormones on GLUT1-4 expression and deoxyglucose transport in ZR-75-1 breast cancer cells. Immunoblotting, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry, and RT-PCR showed that GLUT1 expression is up-regulated by progesterone and, to a greater degree, combined therapy. GLUT2 expression is unaffected by hormonal treatment. GLUT3 protein and RNA is up-regulated by progesterone and combined therapy, and GLUT4 protein expression is up-regulated by all hormonal treatments. Deoxyglucose transport studies revealed the presence of three transport components with characteristics corresponding to GLUT1/4, GLUT2, and GLUT3. 17beta-Estradiol produced a slight increase in transport at the Michaelis constant (Km) corresponding to GLUT3. Progesterone produced a small increase in transport at the Km corresponding to GLUT1/4, and combined 17beta-estradiol and progesterone produced a small increase in transport at the Km corresponding to GLUT3 and a large increase in transport at the Km corresponding to GLUT1/4. This indicates that 17beta-estradiol and progesterone differentially regulate GLUT1-4 expression and that these changes correlate to changes in glucose uptake. We postulate that combined hormone replacement therapy provides a survival advantage to developing ZR-75 breast cancer cells.