Flumazenil use in an emergency department: a survey

Strategies for the treatment of acute benzodiazepine toxicity in a clinical setting: the role of antidotes

INTRODUCTION

Although not a potentially life-threatening poisoning, benzodiazepine (BZD) intoxication may be life-threatening in special situations/populations or those with background diseases.

AREAS COVERED

The aim of this review is to evaluate all possible treatment options available in the literature for the management of benzodiazepine poisoning with special attention to antidote administration. We conducted a literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, EMBASE, and Cochrane central register from 1 January 1980 to 10 November 2021 using keywords 'benzodiazepine,' 'poisoning,' 'toxicity,' 'intoxication,' and 'treatment.'

EXPERT OPINION

Careful patient selection, ideally by a clinical toxicologist, may decrease the complications of flumazenil and add to its efficacy. The cost-to-benefit ratio should be considered in every single patient who is a candidate for flumazenil administration. In case a decision has been made to administer flumazenil, careful consideration of the possible contraindications is essential. We recommend slow administration of low doses of flumazenil (0.1 mg/minute) to avoid complications or withhold the administration with development of first signs of adverse effects. The main treatment of benzodiazepine toxicity is conservative with administration of activated charcoal, monitoring of the vital signs, prevention of aspiration and development of deep vein thrombosis due to prolonged immobilization, and respiratory support.

Flumazenil administration in poisoned pediatric patients

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients exposed to flumazenil was to identify the frequency of seizures.

METHODS

Included patient were those aged 12 years or younger who received flumazenil, who had evidence of clinical poisoning as defined by an altered mental status, and who were reported to the California Poison Control System for the period 1999 to 2008. Data variables were age, sex, seizure, death, acute exposure to a benzodiazepine, drugs of exposure, long-term use of benzodiazepines, history of a seizure disorder, mental status before flumazenil administration, and poison center recommendation of flumazenil (yes/no).

RESULTS

Eighty-three patients were included. Forty-eight (58%) of this subset were female. Median age was 2 years (range, 3 months-12 years). Seventy (84%) patients were younger than 5 years. Of the 83 patients, 68 (82%) were allegedly exposed to a benzodiazepine; whereas, 12 (15%) had been allegedly exposed to a proconvulsant drug. No flumazenil-related seizures occurred (0% with 95% confidence interval, 0%-4%). The California Poison Control System recommended flumazenil use in 60 (72%) of the 83 cases, and 48 of these had been allegedly exposed to a benzodiazepine.

CONCLUSIONS

No flumazenil-associated seizures occurred among allegedly benzodiazepine- and non-benzodiazepine-poisoned pediatric patients aged 12 years or younger.

Prospective comparative assessment of buprenorphine overdose with heroin and methadone: clinical characteristics and response to antidotal treatment

Buprenorphine is a partial opioid agonist with a "ceiling effect" for respiratory depression. Despite this, it has been associated with severe overdoses. Conflicting data exist regarding its response in overdose to naloxone. We compared clinical overdose characteristics of buprenorphine with heroin and methadone and assessed responses to naloxone and flumazenil. Patients admitted to two intensive care units with severe opioid overdoses were enrolled into this 4-year prospective study. Urine and blood toxicological screening were performed to identify overdoses involving predominantly buprenorphine, heroin, or methadone. Eighty-four patients with heroin (n = 26), buprenorphine (n = 39), or methadone (n = 19) overdoses were analyzed. In the buprenorphine group, sedative drug coingestions were frequent (95%), whereas in the methadone group, suicide attempts were significantly more often reported (p = .0007). Buprenorphine overdose induced an opioid syndrome not differing significantly from heroin and methadone in mental status (as measured by Glasgow Coma Score) or arterial blood gases. Mental status depression was not reversed in buprenorphine overdoses with naloxone (0.4-0.8 mg) but did improve with flumazenil (0.2-1 mg) if benzodiazepines were coingested. In conclusion, buprenorphine overdose causes an opioid syndrome clinically indistinguishable from heroin and methadone. Although mental status and respiratory depression are often unresponsive to low-dose naloxone, flumazenil may be effective in buprenorphine overdoses involving benzodiazepines.

Suicide by Multidrug Ingestion

A fatal suicidal ingestion of drugs, together with activated charcoal, is reported. The death occurred 31 hours after the self-administration. The autopsy revealed a large amount of gastric content that appeared to be a compact mass of black color. Toxicologic analyses showed the presence of toxic levels of desalkylflurazepam and trazodone; metamizole and pridinol were also detected. The obtained results supported the hypothesis of a death due to acute intoxication delayed by the self-administration of activated charcoal, which elimination was probably hindered by the action of pridinol.

Flumazenil—Treatment or Toxin

Flumazenil is frequently administered to the poisoned patient. Seizures may be precipitated and resedation may occur in patients who awakened following flumazenil administration. Seizures may increase morbidity and mortality of the overdose. Benefit:Risk ratio of administering flumazenil should be determined in each overdose patient. Indications for flumazenil are limited.