Phase I study of vinorelbine and docetaxel with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer

Clinical features of taxane neuropathy

Sensory neuropathy is the dose-limiting toxicity of paclitaxel and also impacts on the use of docetaxel and other taxanes. The cause of this adverse effect has to do with their mechanism of action against microtubules and its interaction with neuronal cytoskeletal components. The variability of this toxicity is defined by several factors including disease type, taxane class, schedule and dose of the specific drug, patient demographics, and use of taxanes in combination regimens (especially with the platinums that are also neurotoxic). Prevention of life-long neuropathy is only produced if the causative drug is halted--treatments to reverse toxicity have shown only minimal improvement. This review investigates trials defining the clinical factors that determine the therapeutic window of taxanes and the enhanced susceptibility to this toxicity. In addition, case vignettes illustrate the range of clinical manifestations of this toxicity during taxane administration.

A phase II study of docetaxel and vinorelbine plus filgrastim for HER-2 negative, stage IV breast cancer: SWOG S0102

Docetaxel and vinorelbine have demonstrated Single-agent activity in breast cancer. Preclinical studies suggest potential synergy between these antitubulin chemotherapy agents. This study evaluates these drugs in combination in metastatic breast cancer. Taxane-naive patients with HER-2 negative, stage IV breast cancer without prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, were eligible. Docetaxel (60 mg/m²) was given intravenously on Day 1, vinorelbine (27.5 mg/m²) intravenously on Days 8 and 15, and filgrastim on Days 2–21 of a 21-day cycle. The primary study outcome was one-year overall survival (OS), with secondary outcomes of progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and toxicity. Of 95 patients registered, 92 were eligible and received treatment. One-year OS was 74 % (95 % CI 64–82 %) with a median OS of 22.3 months (95 % CI 18.8–31.4 months). One-year PFS was 34 % (95 % CI 24–43 %) with median of 7.2 months (95 % CI 6.4–10.3). OS at 2 and 3 years were 49 % (95 % CI 38–59 %) and 30 % (95 % CI 21–40 %), respectively. OS was poorer for women with estrogen-receptor negative disease (n = 32) compared to estrogen-receptor positive (n = 60) (log-rank p = 0.031), but PFS was not significantly different (p = 0.11). RR was 59 % among the 74 patients with measurable disease. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events were 48 and 16 %, respectively. Grade 4 neutropenia was 12 % and grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia was 3 %. Common grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities were fatigue (14 %), pneumonitis (10 %), and dyspnea (9 %). The combination of docetaxel and vinorelbine is an active first-line chemotherapy in HER-2 nonoverexpressing, metastatic breast cancer. This combination is associated with significant hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity. The safety profile and expense of the filgrastim limit recommendations for routine use.

Defining risks of taxane neuropathy: insights from randomized clinical trials

Sensory neuropathy is a common but difficult to quantify complication encountered during treatment of various cancers with taxane-containing regimens. Docetaxel, paclitaxel, and its nanoparticle albumin-bound formulation have been extensively studied in randomized clinical trials comparing various dose and schedules for the treatment of breast, lung, and ovarian cancers. This review highlights differences in extent of severe neuropathies encountered in such randomized trials and seeks to draw conclusions in terms of known pharmacologic factors that may lead to neuropathy. This basic knowledge provides an essential background for exploring pharmacogenomic differences among patients in relation to their susceptibility of developing severe manifestations. In addition, the differences highlighted may lead to greater insight into drug and basic host factors (such as age, sex, and ethnicity) contributing to axonal injury from taxanes.

Vinorelbine/docetaxel combination treatment of metastatic breast cancer: a phase I study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the combination of vinorelbine (VRL) alternating intravenous (i.v.) and oral in combination with docetaxel (DCT) as first-line chemotherapy of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Tested doses were 60 or 70 mg m(-2) given on day 1 for DCT, 20 to 25 mg m(-2) for i.v. VRL on day 1, 60 mg m(-2) on day 8 or day 15 for oral VRL. Day 1 was administered every 3 weeks. Three to six patients were treated per dose level.

RESULTS

The median age of the 30 treated patients was 60 years. Four patients were non evaluable for the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and were replaced. Reported dose-limiting toxicities were 11 omissions of oral VRL for neutropenia, two cases of febrile neutropenia and two grade 4 neutropenia >or=7 days. Dose levels using DCT doses >60 mg m(-2) and/or i.v. VRL doses >20 mg m(-2) met the criteria for MTD. Most frequent toxicities were febrile neutropenia in seven patients and neutropenic infection in four patients (one fatal). Therefore, the recommended schedule was established at i.v. VRL 20 mg m(-2) with DCT 60 mg m(-2) on day 1 and oral VRL 60 mg m(-2) given on day 15 every 3 weeks. At this recommended schedule, only one of six patients experienced febrile neutropenia. Among 22 patients evaluable for tumour response, 2 complete and 10 partial responses were reported. Pharmacokinetics of combined VRL and DCT demonstrated the absence of mutual interaction.

CONCLUSIONS

This phase I study established the recommended doses and schedules of the combination alternating i.v. and oral VRL with DCT, this recommended regimen being further explored in a phase II study.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer with vinorelbine and docetaxel

OBJECTIVE

A phase II study was performed to evaluate efficacy and safety of the combination vinorelbine and docetaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracycline-based regimens. Overall 41 patients were included in the study.

METHODS

Treatment consisted of vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2, both administered on day 1 every 3 weeks for a maximum of 9 cycles. Most patients (92%) were postmenopausal with a median age of 57 years, and median ECOG performance of 1. Sites of disease were viscera in 42% of patients, bones in 30%, soft-tissues in 32%. Sixty-five percent of patients had >2 metastatic sites. Previous treatments included neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in 7.3% of cases, adjuvant chemotherapy in 71%, and front-line chemotherapy for advanced disease in 50% of cases.

RESULTS

A total of 273 cycles of chemotherapy were delivered (mean 6 cycles/patient). All patients were assessable for toxicity: alopecia was recorded in all patients, grade 2-3 neutropenia in 34% and grade 4 in 9.7%; grade 2-3 nausea/vomiting in 29%, grade 2-3 mucositis in 24.3%. Out of 39 patients evaluable for response, 7 (18%) complete responses and 13 (33%) partial responses have been recorded with an overall response rate of 51%. Six patients (15%) experienced stable disease and 13 patients (33%) progressed. Mean duration of responses was 15.2 months. Median time to progression and median overall survival were 6.2 and 14 months, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with anthracyclines the combination vinorelbine-docetaxel is very active and well tolerated representing a valid therapeutic option for the management of this patient population.

Colonic Rupture in a Patient on Combination Chemotherapy for Metastasized Carcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction. Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Cecal perforation due to neutropenic colitis is a known and described side effect of many chemotherapy regimens. We present a case of a patient with gastric adenocarcinoma who developed spontaneous cecal perforation during chemotherapy without the classic pattern of typhlitis.

CASE REPORT

A 58-year-old woman was on chemotherapy for an adenocarcinoma of the gastric junction, when she developed a cecal perforation. There was neither evidence for leucopenia nor for typhlitis. Laparotomy was performed and cecostomy was established using the perforated bowel. Postoperative course was uneventful. The patient died from tumor progression 8 months after the diagnosis was made.

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence for a connection between this event and chemotherapy treatment but neither can it be excluded. Even if unusual, colon toxicity could be a potential life-threatening complication associated with more drugs than usually thought.

Neutropenic enterocolitis (typhilitis) associated with docetaxel therapy in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer: case report and review of literature

Neutropenic enterocolitis (NE) is an unusual acute complication of neutropenia, most often associated with leukemia and lymphoma which is characterized by segmental cecal and ascending colon ulceration that may progress to necrosis, perforation, and septicemia. We present a case of neutropenic enterocolitis in a patient with non-small-cell lung cancer who received docetaxel and flavopiridol as part of a phase I clinical trial and review cases in the literature where docetaxel was involved. Given the increased use of docetaxel and other taxanes in the treatment of advanced lung cancer, physicians should be aware of this potential toxicity of therapy.

Perspectives on cancer therapy-induced mucosal injury: pathogenesis, measurement, epidemiology, and consequences for patients

BACKGROUND

A frequent complication of anticancer treatment, oral and gastrointestinal (GI) mucositis, threatens the effectiveness of therapy because it leads to dose reductions, increases healthcare costs, and impairs patients' quality of life. The Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer and the International Society for Oral Oncology assembled an international multidisciplinary panel of experts to create clinical practice guidelines for the prevention, evaluation, and treatment of mucositis.

METHODS

The panelists examined medical literature published from January 1966 through May 2002, presented their findings at two separate conferences, and then created a writing committee that produced two articles: the current study and another that codifies the clinical implications of the panel's findings in practice guidelines.

RESULTS

New evidence supports the view that oral mucositis is a complex process involving all the tissues and cellular elements of the mucosa. Other findings suggest that some aspects of mucositis risk may be determined genetically. GI proapoptotic and antiapoptotic gene levels change along the GI tract, perhaps explaining differences in the frequency with which mucositis occurs at different sites. Studies of mucositis incidence in clinical trials by quality and using meta-analysis techniques produced estimates of incidence that are presented herein for what to our knowledge may be a broader range of cancers than ever presented before.

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding the pathobiology of mucositis, its incidence, and scoring are essential for progress in research and care directed at this common side-effect of anticancer therapies.

Neo-adjuvant therapy with dose-dense docetaxel plus short-term filgrastim rescue for locally advanced breast cancer

Neo-adjuvant, dose-dense docetaxel, 100 mg/m(2) every 2 weeks x 4 cycles, was administered to 12 patients with locally advance breast cancer (LABC) (10 stage IIIa and three stage IIIb). Eligibility requirements included a PS 0-2, normal hepatic and renal function, and radiologic absence of metastatic disease. Filgrastim [granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF)] was started 1 day after chemotherapy and was given for 6 days. Complete blood counts were determined weekly. Surgery was planned upon recovery from the last dose of docetaxel and followed by 4 cycles of adjuvant doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide (AC) and radiotherapy. Patients with ER status received tamoxifen. The median age was 45 (range 34-73) and pre-treatment pathology revealed poorly differentiated infiltrating duct carcinoma in 11 and infiltrating lobular cancer in one, with positive ER/PR status in five. Twelve patients were treated, and all are evaluable for response and toxicity. Nine patients had a major clinical tumor response with five PR and four pathologic complete responses (pCR rate of 33%). Three patients (of whom two with stage IIIb) had progressive disease and went on to receive neo-adjuvant therapy with AC. There was one instance of grade 3 hematologic toxicity (neutropenic fever in one G-CSF non-compliant patient). There were two instances of grade 3 extra-hematologic toxicity: one patient had severe pain and one had treatment-related fatigue. After a median follow-up of 20 months (range 7-49 months) all patients are alive and eight of nine responders remain progression-free. Despite the small size of our study, we believe that dose-dense neo-adjuvant docetaxel is well tolerated and its activity warrants confirmation in a larger number of patients.