Gefitinib in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): The Expanded Access Protocol Experience at the University of Pennsylvania

Epidermal growth factor receptor first generation tyrosine-kinase inhibitors

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) oncogene was positioned as an attractive target for drug development in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib and erlotinib were the first two reversible inhibitors of the EGFR kinase. The discovery of EGFR kinase domain-activating mutations that significantly correlated with a high likelihood of response to EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) allowed to design studies to test these drugs as potential first-line therapies. In the same way, the feasibility of personalized medicine was established in patients with advanced NSCLC. Currently in the field of NSCLC with EGFR mutation have developed second and even third generation TKIs that would be gaining the positioning in the treatment of this subset population of NSCLC. In spite of this, without the knowledge that EGFR first generation TKIs have provided, we would not have gotten so far. We will review step by step how it was forged the exciting history of the subpopulation of lung cancer with EGFR mutated, through the various clinical trials performed with first generation TKIs that changed the focus, the future of NSCLC as well as survival of these patients.

The Role of Gefitinib in Patients with Non-small-cell Lung Cancer in India

Background:

Gefitinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor, represents a new treatment option for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We analyzed the data of patients who received Gefitinib for NSCLC in a tertiary care center in South India.

Materials and Methods:

Sixty-three patients with advanced NSCLC who had received Gefitinib either after failure of conventional chemotherapy or were previously not treated as they were unfit or unwilling for conventional treatment were included in the analysis.

Results:

The median follow-up for the cohort was 311 days (range 11-1544 days). Median time to progression was 161 (range 9-883) days. Complete and partial remission was seen in 1 (2%) and 6 (9%) patients, respectively, with overall response rate of 11%. Twenty-four (38%) patients had stable disease. Gefitinib was well tolerated with no significant side effects.

Conclusion:

Gefitinib shows anti-tumor activity in pretreated or previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. It has a favorable toxicity profile and is well tolerated. Gefitinib should be considered as a viable therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Skin rash could predict the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and the prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The aim of this study was to assess the role of skin rash in predicting the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Method

We systematically searched for eligible articles investigating the association between rash and the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. The summary risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using meta-analysis.

Results

We identified 33 eligible trials involving 6,798 patients. We used two different standards to group the patients [standard 1: rash vs. no rash, standard 2: rash (≥ stage 2) vs. rash (stage 0, 1)]. For standard 1, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the rash group were significantly higher than the no rash group [RR = 3.28; 95% CI: 2.41–4.47(corrected RR = 2.225, 95% CI: 1.658–2.986); RR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58–2.43]. The same results were observed for standard 2. For standards 1 and 2, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.53; HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50–0.65) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28–0.52; HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.71) of the rash group were significantly longer than the control group, and the same results were observed in the subgroup analysis.

Conclusions

skin rash after EGFR-TKI treatment may be an efficient clinical marker for predicting the response of patients with NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, skin rash is also the prognostic factor of patients with NSCLC. Patients with skin rash have a longer PFS and OS.

Capecitabine versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer: final results from the X-ACT trial with analysis by age and preliminary evidence of a pharmacodynamic marker of efficacy

BACKGROUND

This multicenter randomized trial compared oral capecitabine with bolus i.v. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) as adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were assigned to 24 weeks of capecitabine 1250 mg/m(2) twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks or 5-FU/FA (Mayo Clinic regimen). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

The intent-to-treat population received capecitabine (n = 1004) or 5-FU/FA (n = 983). With a median follow-up of 6.9 years, capecitabine was at least equivalent to 5-FU/FA in terms of DFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77-1.01] and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.86; 95% CI 0.74-1.01); the 95% CI upper limits were significantly less than the predefined noninferiority margins of 1.20 (P < 0.0001) and 1.14 (P < 0.001), respectively. This pattern was maintained in all subgroups, including patients aged ≥ 70 years. Preplanned multivariate analyses showed that capecitabine had statistically significant beneficial effects on DFS (P = 0.021) and OS (P = 0.020) versus 5-FU/FA. A post hoc analysis suggested that the occurrence of hand-foot syndrome may be associated with better outcomes in capecitabine recipients.

CONCLUSION

Oral capecitabine is an effective alternative to bolus 5-FU/FA as adjuvant treatment of patients with stage III colon cancer with efficacy benefits maintained at 5 years and in older patients.

Targeted therapies for lung cancer: clinical experience and novel agents

Although lung cancer remains the leading cancer killer in the United States, recently a number of developments indicate future clinical benefit. These include evidence that computed tomography-based screening decreases lung cancer mortality, the use of stereotactic radiation for early-stage tumors, the development of molecular methods to predict chemotherapy sensitivity, and genome-wide expression and mutation analysis data that have uncovered oncogene "addictions" as important therapeutic targets. Perhaps the most significant advance in the treatment of this challenging disease is the introduction of molecularly targeted therapies, a term that currently includes monoclonal antibodies and small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors. The development of effective targeted therapeutics requires knowledge of the genes and pathways involved and how they relate to the biologic behavior of lung cancer. Drugs targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor, anaplastic lymphoma kinase, and vascular endothelial growth factor are now U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. These agents are generally better tolerated than conventional chemotherapy and show dramatic efficacy when their use is coupled with a clear understanding of clinical data, mechanism, patient selection, drug interactions, and toxicities. Integrating genome-wide tumor analysis with drug- and targeted agent-responsive phenotypes will provide a wealth of new possibilities for lung cancer-targeted therapeutics. Ongoing research efforts in these areas as well as a discussion of emerging targeted agents being evaluated in clinical trials are the subjects of this review.

Lung cancer in never smokers: molecular profiles and therapeutic implications

The majority of lung cancers are caused by long term exposure to the several classes of carcinogens present in tobacco smoke. Although a significant fraction of lung cancers in never smokers may also be attributable to tobacco, many such cancers arise in the absence of detectable tobacco exposure, and may follow a very different cellular and molecular pathway of malignant transformation. Recent studies summarized here suggest that lung cancers arising in never smokers have a distinct natural history, profile of oncogenic mutations, and response to targeted therapy. The majority of molecular analyses of lung cancer have focused on genetic profiling of pathways responsible for metabolism of primary tobacco carcinogens. Limited research has been conducted evaluating familial aggregation and genetic linkage of lung cancer, particularly among never smokers in whom such associations might be expected to be strongest. Data emerging over the past several years show that lung cancers in never smokers are much more likely to carry activating mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), a key oncogenic factor and direct therapeutic target of several newer anticancer drugs. EGFR mutant lung cancers may represent a distinct class of lung cancers, enriched in the never-smoking population, and less clearly linked to direct tobacco carcinogenesis. These insights followed initial testing and demonstration of efficacy of EGFR-targeted drugs. Focused analysis of molecular carcinogenesis in lung cancers in never smokers is needed, and may provide additional biologic insight with therapeutic implications for lung cancers in both ever smokers and never smokers.

Clinicopathological predictors of EGFR/KRAS mutational status in primary lung adenocarcinomas

Screening for EGFR and KRAS mutations in patients with lung adenocarcinomas can be used to predict the patient's response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, but there is a lack of guidelines for testing in clinical practice. We analyzed the morphological and clinicopathological characteristics, including tumor stage, size, presence of scar, inflammatory response, angiolymphatic and pleural invasion, of 345 surgically treated primary lung adenocarcinomas with respect to their EGFR and KRAS mutational profile and EGFR FISH. EGFR and KRAS mutations were found in 33 (10%) and 78 (23%) of lung adenocarcinomas, respectively, whereas 226 (67%) cases were negative for both mutations. There was a large overlap in the analyzed clinicopathological characteristics among the three study groups. Statistically significant predictors for the presence of EGFR mutations included history of never smoking (OR 5.939; 95% Wald confidence limit 1.662-21.223, P=0.0149), mild lymphocytic host response (OR 4.724; 95% Wald confidence limit 1.33-1.776; P=0.0163), female gender (OR 2.571; 95% Wald confidence limit 1.015-6.511, P=0.0463) and absence of solid growth pattern. Statistically significant predictors for the presence of KRAS mutations included older age (OR 1.034; 95% Wald confidence limit 1.007-1.062, P=0.0132), history of smoking (OR 0.617, 95% Wald confidence limit 0.357-1.066, P=0.0412) and mucinous differentiation. EGFR FISH positivity as defined by the Colorado criteria was a significant predictor of EGFR mutations, with high polysomy as the strongest predictive criteria. Despite statistically significant differences among the study groups and because of the large overlap in the analyzed clinicopathological criteria, none of these could be implemented as the selection criteria for molecular testing in clinical practice. The cost-effectiveness of lung carcinoma mutational testing would be improved by initial determination of KRAS mutational status as negative predictor of the patient's response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, followed by EGFR mutational analysis, if necessary.

High incidence of oral dysesthesias on a trial of gefitinib, Paclitaxel, and concurrent external beam radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancers

OBJECTIVES

To report a high incidence of oral mucosal dysesthesia occurring in patients on a pilot study of the epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (Iressa) in combination with paclitaxel (Taxol) and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Nine patients were enrolled on a pilot phase I trial of oral gefitinib 250 mg/d with 6 weekly doses of paclitaxel (36 or 45 mg/m) and concurrent radiation therapy [66-76 Gray (Gy)]. All had stage III/IVA-B squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Patients were evaluated twice weekly by physicians and daily by nursing for adverse events.

RESULTS

Six of 9 patients (67%) developed a grade 3 "burning" quality oral dysesthesia. These patients received at least 50 Gy (range 50-70 Gy) to the oral tongue. The patients without grade 3 oral dysesthesia received less than 50 Gy radiation to the oral tongue. The oral dysesthesia was exacerbated by the ingestion of neutral pH liquids such as water. Of the 6 patients, all eventually developed common toxicity criteria grade 3/4 mucositis; however, symptoms continued after resolution of the mucositis. Gabapentin (Neurontin) was administered to 2 patients as a treatment for painful mucosal neuropathy. Both patients had near resolution of symptoms despite the evolution of oral mucositis.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of "burning"-type oral dysesthesia occurred in patients treated with the combination of gefitinib, paclitaxel, and external beam radiation of the oral tongue. This dysesthesia was improved by the use of gabapentin.

EGFR Inhibition in the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors have introduced the concept of targeted therapy to the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These agents appear most effective in patients with tumors that are highly dependent on EGFR signaling pathways, a population that disproportionately includes females, nonsmokers, individuals of East Asian origin, and patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Currently available EGFR-inhibiting drugs include the tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) erlotinib, gefitinib, and lapatinib, which are administered orally and interfere with the intracellular tyrosine kinase domain, and the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) cetuximab and panitumumab, which are administered intravenously and interfere with extracellular ligand binding. While the use of EGFR TKIs as monotherapy prolongs survival in metastatic NSCLC, they have demonstrated no benefit when added to conventional, cytotoxic chemotherapy. In contrast, the anti-EGFR mAb cetuximab appears most effective when combined with chemotherapy or radiation. Despite dramatic initial responses to treatment in some cases, NSCLC eventually becomes resistant to EGFR inhibition. Possible mechanisms include secondary mutations that interfere with drug binding, oncogenic pathways driven by other receptor tyrosine kinases, and independent activity of downstream signaling molecules. Efforts to overcome such resistance include irreversibly binding EGFR TKIs, multi-targeted TKIs, and combinations with chemotherapy, radiation, and other targeted therapies.

EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Lung Cancer: An Evolving Story

Drugs that target the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) have had a major impact on the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The use of these drugs has also motivated pivotal advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of NSCLC, including the discovery that mutations in EGFR are associated with dramatic and sustained responses to anti-EGFR treatments. This review summarizes the clinical development of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the discovery of molecular predictors of response, and the future directions for research in the field.

Germline polymorphisms in EGFR and survival in patients with lung cancer receiving gefitinib

The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations between germline epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) variants involved in transcriptional regulation and overall survival in white patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib. Of 175 consecutive patients treated with oral gefitinib (250 mg/day), 170 (median age: 67 years; 72% men) were evaluable for genotyping and survival. Fifty-five patients (33%) had stable disease and 17 (10%) had an objective response. The most common of four haplotypes was G-C (EGFR*1) at the EGFR -216G>T and -191C>A loci (frequency, 0.45). After adjusting for performance status, previous platinum-containing chemotherapy and occurrence of skin rash or diarrhea during the first treatment cycle in patients with performance status 0 or 1 (N=139), the absence of EGFR*1 was associated with significantly better survival (hazard ratio: 0.54; 95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.91; P=0.015). The results may help identify patients with NSCLC who can benefit from gefitinib treatment.

Target practice: lessons from phase III trials with bevacizumab and vatalanib in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is one of the most important factors involved in tumor angiogenesis and has become an important target for anticancer treatment. In 2004, this approach was validated in a randomized, controlled phase III clinical trial. It was shown that the addition of bevacizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody against VEGF-A, to conventional chemotherapy prolonged survival over chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. In this review, we discuss the results of the clinical trials that have led to the incorporation of antiangiogenic agents into the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. We limit ourselves to the two agents that have been tested extensively in phase III trials: bevacizumab and vatalanib, a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor against VEGF receptors. In addition, we discuss the adverse effects of bevacizumab and vatalanib and the clinical management of the side effects.

Phase II trial of sequential gefitinib after minor response or partial response to chemotherapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Basic research of gefitinib (Iressa, ZD1839) has demonstrated the combination effects of gefitinib and chemotherapy were sequence-dependent. To evaluate the efficacy of sequential administration of gefitinib following a minor response or partial response to two to three cycles of chemotherapy, a phase II clinical trial was done in Chinese patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Thirty-three consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC that had been pretreated with at least one chemotherapeutic regimen and were responding to chemotherapy following 2 to 3 cycles of treatment, entered the trial from May 2004 to February 2006. Patients received gefitinib at an oral dose of 250 mg once daily for 4 weeks.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were evaluable for response and toxicity. The objective response rate was 24.2% (8 of 33) (95% CI, 11% to 42%). The symptom improvement rate was 54.5% (18 of 33) (95% CI, 41% to 69%). The median duration of response was 7 months (95%CI, 4.0 to 13.2 months). The median time to disease progression (TTP) was 6.5 months (95%CI, 0.7 to 16.6 months). The median overall survival time (OS) was 9.8 months (range, 2.1 to 18.0 months), and the actuarial 1-year survival was 36.4%. Toxicity was relatively mild and included only one patient (3.0%) with grade 4 diarrhea, 1 (3.0%) with grade 3 rash, 1 (3.0%) with grade 3 nausea, and 1 with grade 3 vomiting (3.0%).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary results suggest that sequential administration of gefitinib following a response to chemotherapy may be beneficial for Chinese patients with advanced NSCLC. Further randomized clinical trials are needed.

Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition and non-small cell lung cancer

The majority of non-small cell (NSC) lung cancers express epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Many studies have evaluated the clinical effect from targeted therapy achieved by blocking EGFR in patients with NSC lung cancer. Treatment of biologically unselected patients with NSC lung cancer with two reversible quinazole EGFR inhibitors, gefitinib and erlotinib, gave negative results in all controlled trials but one. Ten percent to 20% of patients with NSC lung cancers have somatic mutations in EGFR, and these patients have a significantly higher response rate (73%) to treatment with EGFR inhibitors than patients with wild-type EGFR (10%). Patients with Asian background, women, non-smokers, and patients with adenocarcinoma had higher response rates than other patients, and the differences may be due to an association between the clinical characteristics and EGFR mutations. Further studies are needed to fully evaluate the effect of EGFR inhibitor-treatment for subgroups of patients with NSC lung cancer with favorable biological and clinical characteristics.