In vitro-in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) of deposition for drugs given by oral inhalation

Conventional in vitro tests to assess the aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) from inhaler devices use simple right-angle inlets ("mouth-throats", MTs) to cascade impactors, and air is drawn through the system at a fixed flow for a fixed time. Since this arrangement differs substantially from both human oropharyngeal airway anatomy and the patterns of air flow when patients use inhalers, the ability of in vitro tests to predict in vivo deposition of pharmaceutical aerosols has been limited. MTs that mimic the human anatomy, coupled with simulated breathing patterns, have yielded estimates of lung dose from in vitro data that closely match those from in vivo gamma scintigraphic or pharmacokinetic studies. However, different models of MTs do not always yield identical data, and selection of an anatomical MT and representative inhalation profiles remains challenging. Improved in vitro - in vivo correlations (IVIVCs) for inhaled drug products could permit increased reliance on in vitro data when developing new inhaled drug products, and could ultimately result in accelerated drug product development, together with reduced research and development spending.

Long-Term Fluticasone Propionate/Formoterol Fumarate Combination Therapy Is Associated with a Low Incidence of Severe Asthma Exacerbations

BACKGROUND

A primary goal of asthma management is the reduction of exacerbation risk. We assessed the occurrence of oral corticosteroid-requiring exacerbations (OCS exacerbations) with long-term fluticasone/formoterol therapy, and compared it with the occurrence of similar events reported with other inhaled corticosteroid/long acting β2-agonist (ICS/LABA) combinations.

METHODS

The occurrence of OCS exacerbations was assessed in two open-label trials of fixed-dose fluticasone/formoterol administered for between 26 to 60 weeks in adults and adolescents with asthma. The incidence of OCS exacerbations with fluticasone/formoterol was compared with those reported in three recent Cochrane meta-analyses of other ICS/LABAs.

RESULTS

The pooled incidence of OCS exacerbations with long-term fluticasone/formoterol was 2.1% (95% CI: 1.1, 3.2%, n/N = 16/752). In only two of the nineteen treatment arms summarized by Cochrane did OCS exacerbation incidence approximate that seen in the two fluticasone/formoterol trials (single-inhaler fluticasone/salmeterol [2.9%]; separate inhaler budesonide, beclometasone, or flunisolide plus formoterol [3.4%]). In Lasserson's review the pooled incidence of OCS exacerbations for single-inhaler combinations was 9.5% (95% CI: 8.4, 10.6%; n/N = 239/2516) for fluticasone/salmeterol, and 10.6% (95% CI: 9.3, 11.8%; n/N = 257/2433) for budesonide/formoterol. In Ducharme's and Chauhan's meta-analyses (primarily incorporating separate inhaler combinations [fluticasone, budesonide, beclometasone, or flunisolide plus salmeterol or formoterol]), the pooled incidences of OCS exacerbations were 16.0% (95% CI: 14.2, 17.8%, n/N = 258/1615) and 16.7% (95% CI: 14.9, 18.5, n/N = 275/1643), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of exacerbations in two fixed-dose fluticasone/formoterol studies was low and less than in the majority of comparable published studies involving other ICS/LABA combinations. This difference could not be readily explained by differences in features of the respective studies and may be related to the favorable pharmacological/mechanistic characteristics of the constituent components fluticasone and formoterol compared to other drugs in their respective classes.

Assessment methods of inhaled aerosols: technical aspects and applications

The pulmonary route has been used with success for the treatment of both lung (asthma) and systemic diseases (diabetes). The fate of an inhaled drug (absorption and deposition) within human lungs has great importance, particularly in drug development and quality control. This article focuses on the various methods that are now applied for aerosol fate investigation. Several assessment methods, ranging from in vitro assays (impaction and optical systems) to in vivo experiments (imaging and pharmacological methods), are described. In vitro assays measure particle size distribution and emitted drug dose, which could be predictive of lung deposition pattern in vivo. However, in vivo methods provide direct information about the concentration and the location of inhaled drug within lung. Advantages and limitations of the different techniques are identified. In addition to these experimental techniques, mathematical deposition models, elaborated in more realistic conditions and designed to predict the fate of inhaled particles, are also illustrated.