Efficacy of inhaled budesonide and oral theophylline in asthmatic subjects

Concurrent oral and inhalation drug delivery using a dual formulation system: the use of oral theophylline carrier with combined inhalable budesonide and terbutaline

A novel approach to concurrently deliver oral and inhaled drugs as a single formulation is presented. A triple therapy containing theophylline (THEO; orally delivered) with budesonide (BUD) and terbutaline (TERB; as single and co-spray-dried inhaled powders) was prepared as an ordered mix, with THEO acting as a carrier. The aerosolisation performance of THEO formulations containing BUD and TERB alone, physical mix and co-spray-dried powder was evaluated using a next-generation impactor (NGI). Physicochemical properties were investigated using electron microscopy, laser diffraction, dynamic vapour sorption and thermal analysis. NGI analysis indicated that >99 % of the THEO powder was >4.46 μm, with >90 % dissolved within 5 min. Particle size analysis showed TEB and BUD samples were of a suitable size for inhalation. Thermal and moisture analysis suggested powders to be stable at room temperature up to 70 % RH. Aerosol studies indicated a different performance of BUD and TERB depending on the mixing procedure. The co-spray-dried formulation showed the highest performance, with a fine particle fraction (≤4.46 μm) of BUD and TERB of 34.39 ± 3.56 and 33.61 ± 5.67 %, respectively. Such observations suggest that this multicomponent drug delivery system could be developed to concomitantly deliver oral and inhaled drugs, an approach that, to date, does not exist. Ultimately, this technology potentially reduces the requirement for multiple therapies and increases patient compliance.

Role of adenosine receptors in the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: recent developments

Adenosine is a naturally occurring purine nucleoside with a ubiquitous presence in human tissue, where it plays a key role in many biological processes such as energy generation and protein metabolism. It has been shown that adenosine induces bronchoconstriction in asthmatic and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, but not in normal airways. Four different G-protein-coupled adenosine receptors have been described, namely adenosine A(1), A(2A), A(2B) and A(3) receptors. The main mechanism of adenosine-induced bronchoconstriction appears to involve the release of inflammatory mediators from mast cells via activation of the A(2B) receptor. However, adenosine can also act on A(1), A(2A) and A(3) receptors. In recent years there has been an increasing interest in the role of adenosine receptors in asthma and COPD, since it is now clear that they play an important role in the pathophysiology of asthma and COPD. Adenosine receptors are involved in the production and release of a variety of mediators from inflammatory and structural cells. A therapeutic potential for adenosine receptor modulation has even been anticipated. This review focuses on the role of adenosine and adenosine receptors in the treatment of asthma and COPD.

Effects of different anti-asthmatic agents on induced sputum and eosinophil cationic protein in mild asthmatics

OBJECTIVES

Inhaled corticosteroids, leukotriene receptor antagonists, and theophylline are recommended for the treatment of mild persistent asthma. The aim of this study was to compare the changes in sputum total cell and eosinophil counts, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in serum and sputum following treatment with leukotriene receptor antagonists, inhaled corticosteroids, and theophylline in patients with mild persistent asthma.

METHODOLOGY

Total cell counts, eosinophil percentage, and ECP levels in induced sputum and serum were determined both before and after treatment. Prior to sputum induction, FEV1 and PEF values and symptom scores were recorded at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment. After baseline measurements, the asthmatic patients (n = 30) were randomized into three groups. A total of 10 patients were treated with zafirlukast, 20 mg bd, 10 with budesonide inhaler 200 microg bd, and 10 with theophylline 200 mg bd.

RESULTS

There were significant decreases in sputum total cell counts and eosinophil percentage in all treatment groups. However, the decrease in sputum eosinophil counts was more significant in the corticosteroid-treated group. Although sputum ECP levels decreased significantly in the groups treated with zafirlukast and budesonide (zafirlukast group, 580-135 microg/L, P < 0.01; budesonide group, 683-268 microg/L, P < 0.01), the decrease was not statistically significant in the theophylline-treated group (498-361 microg/L, P > 0.05). In contrast, there were no significant changes in serum ECP levels in any of the treatment groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All three treatments resulted in significant decreases in sputum total cell counts and eosinophil percentage, but the decrease in sputum ECP level was only seen in the groups treated with budesonide and zafirlukast. These results suggest that although all three treatments are considered as first-line treatments in most consensuses, theophylline seems to have less of an inhibitory effect on eosinophil activation.