Therapeutic Apheresis of Immune Diseases in Nephrology Department

Use of Therapeutic Apheresis methods in Neurology patients

The therapeutic apheresis consists of a continuously improving therapeutic method for diseases with high mortality and morbidity, especially in cases with poor outcome by using current medications. Neurology is one the most famous and at the same most interesting era of apheresis intervention in clinical practice.

Therapeutic Apheresis and Nephrologist: New and old aspects

The clinical efficacy of therapeutic apheresis is still controversial. We undertook a retrospective review of apheresis treatment to ascertain its safety and efficacy. The therapeutic apheresis consists of a continuously improving therapeutic method for diseases with high mortality and morbidity, especially in cases with poor outcome by using current medications.

Simple “closed-circuit” group-specific immunoadsorption system for ABO-incompatible kidney transplants

There is a need for improvement of the detection and treatment of the antibody-mediated graft rejection for ABO-incompatible kidney transplant recipients. With the development of novel pre-conditioning protocols, which employ anti-CD20 antibody, therapeutic plasma exchange plus extracorporeal immunoadsorption and standard immunosuppression application, together with the use of more sensitive and objective assays for immunological monitoring, patients that were not candidates for kidney transplant in the past, are now being transplanted. We have designed a pre-conditioning protocol for ABO-incompatible kidney transplants based on TPE plus our own simple "closed-circuit" immunoadsorption technique - combined by anti-CD20, standard immunosuppressive treatment, and without splenectomy. The results obtained in this study strongly support our hypothesis leading to the conclusion that this protocol can be used successfully, with high-quality ABO antibody depletion (p<0.001) and beneficial clinical findings. The application of this protocol is safe, and not associated with alteration in normal plasma constituent levels or with occurrence of any side effects of apheresis or clinical consequences. Finally, this pre-conditioning protocol radically reduces the treatment-cost. Definitive conclusions can only be drawn from larger, randomized, controlled clinical trials.

Apheresis in donor and therapeutic settings: Recruitments vs. possibilities—a multicenter study

In our country, the first apheresis was performed in the late 1960s (by manual technique), and the first cell separator was used in 1979. The number of blood component collections performed from 1994 to 2004 was: 11,170 (total), i.e., 8540 (NBTI), 1180 (IT-MMA), 1050 (BTI of Novi Sad) and 400 (BTI Nis). The number of PBSC harvests during 1996-2004 was 386 for treatment of 272 patients. For treatment of myocardial infarction, "cell-therapy" by autologous stem cells was introduced in 2004 at the MMA. The results of PE treatments performed (7632 sessions) by our group for various immune-mediated and other disorders were generally beneficial, but the effect is not associated with bone marrow remission. TC procedures (total number=1279) resulted in a significant fall in the blood cell counts and hemorheological improvement, as well as the removal and replacement of abnormal red blood cells. Greater standardization of different apheresis protocols is required.