The Ino80 chromatin-remodeling complex restores chromatin structure during UV DNA damage repair

Photoreactivation Activities of Rad5, Rad16A and Rad16B Help Beauveria bassiana to Recover from Solar Ultraviolet Damage

In budding yeast, Rad5 and Rad7-Rad16 play respective roles in the error-free post-replication repair and nucleotide excision repair of ultraviolet-induced DNA damage; however, their homologs have not yet been studied in non-yeast fungi. In the fungus Beauveria bassiana, a deficiency in the Rad7 homolog, Rad5 ortholog and two Rad16 paralogs (Rad16A/B) instituted an ability to help the insect-pathogenic fungus to recover from solar UVB damage through photoreactivation. The fungal lifecycle-related phenotypes were not altered in the absence of rad5, rad16A or rad16B, while severe defects in growth and conidiation were caused by the double deletion of rad16A and rad16B. Compared with the wild-type and complemented strains, the mutants showed differentially reduced activities regarding the resilience of UVB-impaired conidia at 25 °C through a 12-h incubation in a regime of visible light plus dark (L/D 3:9 h or 5:7 h for photoreactivation) or of full darkness (dark reactivation) mimicking a natural nighttime. The estimates of the median lethal UVB dose LD50 from the dark and L/D treatments revealed greater activities of Rad5 and Rad16B than of Rad16A and additive activities of Rad16A and Rad16B in either NER-dependent dark reactivation or photorepair-dependent photoreactivation. However, their dark reactivation activities were limited to recovering low UVB dose-impaired conidia but were unable to recover conidia impaired by sublethal and lethal UVB doses as did their photoreactivation activities at L/D 3:9 or 5:7, unless the night/dark time was doubled or further prolonged. Therefore, the anti-UV effects of Rad5, Rad16A and Rad16B in B. bassiana depend primarily on photoreactivation and are mechanistically distinct from those for their yeast homologs.

Recovery of insect-pathogenic fungi from solar UV damage: Molecular mechanisms and prospects

Molecular mechanisms underlying insect-pathogenic fungal tolerance to solar ultraviolet (UV) damage have been increasingly understood. This chapter reviews the methodology established to quantify fungal response to solar UV radiation, which consists of UVB and UVA, and characterize a pattern of the solar UV dose (damage) accumulated from sunrise to sunset on sunny summer days. An emphasis is placed on anti-UV mechanisms of fungal insect pathogens in comparison to those well documented in model yeast. Principles are discussed for properly timing the application of a fungal pesticide to improve pest control during summer months. Fungal UV tolerance depends on either nucleotide excision repair (NER) or photorepair of UV-induced DNA lesions to recover UV-impaired cells in the darkness or the light. NER is a slow process independent of light and depends on a large family of anti-UV radiation (RAD) proteins studied intensively in model yeast but rarely in non-yeast fungi. Photorepair is a rapid process that had long been considered to depend on only one or two photolyases in filamentous fungi. However, recent studies have greatly expanded a genetic/molecular basis for photorepair-dependent photoreactivation that serves as a primary anti-UV mechanism in insect-pathogenic fungi, in which photolyase regulators required for photorepair and multiple RAD homologs have higher or much higher photoreactivation activities than do photolyases. The NER activities of those homologs in dark reactivation cannot recover the severe UV damage recovered by their activities in photoreactivation. Future studies are expected to further expand the genetic/molecular basis of photoreactivation and enrich principles for the recovery of insect-pathogenic fungi from solar UV damage.

Rad2, Rad14 and Rad26 recover Metarhizium robertsii from solar UV damage through photoreactivation in vivo

Rad2, Rad14 and Rad26 recover ultraviolet (UV) damage by nucleotide excision repair (NER) in budding yeast but their functions in filamentous fungi have not been elucidated. Here, we report mechanistically different anti-UV effects of nucleus-specific Rad2, Rad14 and Rad26 orthologs in Metarhizium robertsii, an insect-pathogenic fungus. The null mutants of rad2, rad14 and rad26 showed a decrease of ∼90% in conidial resistance to UVB irradiation. When conidia were impaired at a UVB dose of 0.15 J/cm2, they were photoreactivated (germinated) by only 6-13% through a 5-h light plus 19-h dark incubation, whereas 100%, 80% and 70% of the wild-type conidia were photoreactivated at 0.15, 0.3 and 0.4 J/cm2, respectively. The dose-dependent photoreactivation rates were far greater than the corresponding 24-h dark reactivation rates and were largely enhanced by the overexpression (OE) of rad2, rad14 or rad26 in the wild-type strain. The OE strains exhibited markedly greater activities in photoreactivation of conidia inactivated at 0.5-0.7 J/cm2 than did the wild-type strain. Confirmed interactions of Rad2, Rad14 and Rad26 with photolyase regulators and/or Rad1 or Rad10 suggest that each of these proteins could have evolved into a component of the photolyase regulator-cored protein complex to mediate photoreactivation. The interactions inhibited in the null mutants resulted in transcriptional abolishment or repression of those factors involved in the complex. In conclusion, the anti-UV effects of Rad2, Rad14 and Rad26 depend primarily on DNA photorepair-dependent photoreactivation in M. robertsii and mechanistically differ from those of yeast orthologs depending on NER.

High photoreactivation activities of Rad2 and Rad14 in recovering insecticidal Beauveria bassiana from solar UV damage

Anti-ultraviolet (UV) roles of Rad2 and Rad14 depend on nucleotide excision repair (NER) of UV-induced DNA lesions in budding yeast but remain unexplored yet in filamentous fungi. Here, nucleus-specific Rad2 and Rad14 orthologs are shown to recover Beauveria bassiana, a main source of wide-spectrum mycoinsecticides, from solar UV damage through photorepair-depending photoreactivation. As a photorepair index, photoreactivation (germination) rates of lethal UVB dose-irradiated conidia via a 3- or 5-h light plus 9- or 7-h dark incubation at 25 °C were drastically reduced in the Δrad2 and Δrad14 mutants versus a wild-type strain. As an NER index, nighttime-mimicking 12-h dark reactivation rates of low UVB dose-impaired conidia decreased sharply compared to the corresponding photoreactivation rates in the presence or absence of either ortholog, indicating that its extant NER activity was limited to recovering light UVB damage in the field. The high photoreactivation activity of either Rad2 or Rad14 was derived from its tight link to a large protein complex formed by photolyase regulators and other anti-UV proteins through multiple protein-protein interactions revealed by yeast two-hybrid assays. Therefore, Rad2 and Rad14 recover B. bassiana from solar UV damage through photoreactiovation in vivo that depends primarily on photorepair, although they contribute little to the fungal lifecycle-related phenotypes. These findings unveil a novel scenario distinguished from the NER-depending anti-UV roles of Rad2 and Rad14 in the model yeast and broaden a biological basis crucial for rational application of fungal insecticides to improve pest control efficacy via feasible recovery of solar UV damage.

Divergent roles of Rad4 and Rad23 homologs in Metarhizium robertsii's resistance to solar ultraviolet damage

The anti-ultraviolet (UV) role of a Rad4-Rad23-Rad33 complex in budding yeast relies on nucleotide excision repair (NER), which is mechanistically distinct from photorepair of DNA lesions generated under solar UV irradiation but remains poorly known in filamentous fungi. Here, two nucleus-specific Rad4 paralogs (Rad4A and Rad4B) and nucleocytoplasmic shuttling Rad23 ortholog are functionally characterized by multiple analyses of their null mutants in Metarhizium robertsii, an entomopathogenic fungus lacking Rad33. Rad4A was proven to interact with Rad23 and contribute significantly more to conidial UVB resistance (90%) than Rad23 (65%). Despite no other biological function, Rad4A exhibited a very high activity in photoreactivation of UVB-impaired/inactivated conidia by 5-h light exposure due to its interaction with Rad10, an anti-UV protein clarified previously to have acquired a similar photoreactivation activity through its interaction with a photolyase in M. robertsii. The NER activity of Rad4A or Rad23 was revealed by lower reactivation rates of moderately impaired conidia after 24-h dark incubation but hardly observable at the end of 12-h dark incubation, suggesting an infeasibility of its NER activity in the field where nighttime is too short. Aside from a remarkable contribution to conidial UVB resistance, Rad23 had pleiotropic effect in radial growth, aerial conidiation, antioxidant response, and cell wall integrity but no photoreactivation activity. However, Rad4B proved redundant in function. The high photoreactivation activity of Rad4A unveils its essentiality for M. robertsii's fitness to solar UV irradiation and is distinct from the yeast homolog's anti-UV role depending on NER. IMPORTANCE Resilience of solar ultraviolet (UV)-impaired cells is crucial for the application of fungal insecticides based on formulated conidia. Anti-UV roles of Rad4, Rad23, and Rad33 rely upon nucleotide excision repair (NER) of DNA lesions in budding yeast. Among two Rad4 paralogs and Rad23 ortholog characterized in Metarhizium robertsii lacking Rad33, Rad4A contributes to conidial UVB resistance more than Rad23, which interacts with Rad4A rather than functionally redundant Rad4B. Rad4A acquires a high activity in photoreactivation of conidia severely impaired or inactivated by UVB irradiation through its interaction with Rad10, another anti-UV protein previously proven to interact with a photorepair-required photolyase. The NER activity of either Rad4A or Rad23 is seemingly extant but unfeasible under field conditions. Rad23 has pleiotropic effect in the asexual cycle in vitro but no photoreactivation activity. Therefore, the strong anti-UV role of Rad4A depends on photoreactivation, unveiling a scenario distinct from the yeast homolog's NER-reliant anti-UV role.

Novel evolved Yarrowia lipolytica strains for enhanced growth and lipid content under high concentrations of crude glycerol

BACKGROUND

Yarrowia lipolytica is a well-studied oleaginous yeast known for its ability to accumulate and store intracellular lipids, while growing on diverse, non-conventional substrates. Amongst them, crude glycerol, a low-cost by-product of the biodiesel industry, appears to be an interesting option for scaling up a sustainable single-cell oil production process. Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) is a powerful tool to force metabolic adaptations endowing tolerance to stressful environmental conditions, generating superior phenotypes with industrial relevance.

RESULTS

Y. lipolytica MUCL 28849 underwent ALE in a synthetic medium with increasing concentration of pure or crude glycerol as a stressing factor (9-20% v/v) for 520 generations. In one case of pure glycerol, chemical mutagenesis with ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS) was applied prior to ALE. Growth profile, biomass production and lipid content of 660 evolved strains (EVS), revealed 5 superior isolates; exhibiting from 1.9 to 3.6-fold increase of dry biomass and from 1.1 to 1.6-fold increase of lipid concentration compared to the parental strain, when grown in 15% v/v crude glycerol. NGS for differential gene expression analysis, showed induced expression in all EVS affecting nucleosomal structure and regulation of transcription. As strains differentiated, further changes accumulated in membrane transport and protein transport processes. Genes involved in glycerol catabolism and triacylglycerol biosynthesis were overexpressed in two EVS. Mismatches and gaps in the expressed sequences identified altered splicing and mutations in the EVS, with most of them, affecting different components of septin ring formation in the budding process. The selected YLE155 EVS, used for scale-up cultivation in a 3L benchtop bioreactor with 20% v/v crude glycerol, achieved extended exponential phase, twofold increase of dry biomass and lipid yields at 48 h, while citric acid secretion and glycerol consumption rates were 40% and 50% lower, respectively, compared to the parental strain, after 24 h of cultivation.

CONCLUSION

ALE and EMS-ALE under increasing concentrations of pure or crude glycerol generated novel Y. lipolytica strains with enhanced biomass and lipid content. Differential gene expression analysis and scale-up of YLE155, illustrated the potential of the evolved strains to serve as suitable "chassis" for rational engineering approaches towards both increased lipid accumulation, and production of high-added value compounds, through efficient utilization of crude glycerol.

Co-Regulatory Roles of WC1 and WC2 in Asexual Development and Photoreactivation of Beauveria bassiana

The white collar proteins WC1 and WC2 interact with each other to form a white collar complex acting as a well-known transcription regulator required for the operation of the circadian clock in Neurospora, but their roles in insect-pathogenic fungal lifecycles remain poorly understood. Here, we report that WC1 and WC2 orthologs co-regulate the conidiation capacity and conidial resistance to solar ultraviolet-B (UVB) irradiation in Beauveria bassiana, after their high activities in the photorepair of UVB-induced DNA damages were elucidated previously in the insect mycopathogen, which features non-rhythmic conidiation and high conidiation capacity. The conidial yield, UVB resistance, and photoreactivation rate of UVB-impaired conidia were greatly reduced in the null mutants of wc1 and wc2 compared to their control strains. However, many other lifecycle-related phenotypes, except the antioxidant response, were rarely affected in the two mutants. Transcriptomic analysis revealed largely overlapping roles for WC1 and WC2 in regulating the fungal gene networks. Most of the differentially expressed genes identified from the null mutants of wc1 (1380) and wc2 (1001) were co-downregulated (536) or co-upregulated (256) at similar levels, including several co-downregulated genes required for aerial conidiation and DNA photorepair. These findings expand a molecular basis underlying the fungal adaptation to solar UV irradiation and offer a novel insight into the genome-wide co-regulatory roles of WC1 and WC2 in B. bassiana's asexual development and in vivo photoreactivation against solar UV damage.

Comparative Roles of Rad4A and Rad4B in Photoprotection of Beauveria bassiana from Solar Ultraviolet Damage

The Rad4-Rad23-Rad33 complex plays an essential anti-ultraviolet (UV) role depending on nucleotide excision repair (NER) in budding yeast but has been rarely studied in filamentous fungi, which possess two Rad4 paralogs (Rad4A/B) and orthologous Rad23 and rely on the photorepair of UV-induced DNA lesions, a distinct mechanism behind the photoreactivation of UV-impaired cells. Previously, nucleocytoplasmic shuttling Rad23 proved to be highly efficient in the photoreactivation of conidia inactivated by UVB, a major component of solar UV, due to its interaction with Phr2 in Beauveria bassiana, a wide-spectrum insect mycopathogen lacking Rad33. Here, either Rad4A or Rad4B was proven to localize exclusively in the nucleus and interact with Rad23, which was previously shown to interact with the white collar protein WC2 as a regulator of two photorepair-required photolyases (Phr1 and Phr2) in B. bassiana. The Δrad4A mutant lost ~80% of conidial UVB resistance and ~50% of activity in the photoreactivation of UVB-inactivated conidia by 5 h light exposure. Intriguingly, the reactivation rates of UVB-impaired conidia were observable only in the presence of rad4A after dark incubation exceeding 24 h, implicating extant, but infeasible, NER activity for Rad4A in the field where night (dark) time is too short. Aside from its strong anti-UVB role, Rad4A played no other role in B. bassiana's lifecycle while Rad4B proved to be functionally redundant. Our findings uncover that the anti-UVB role of Rad4A depends on the photoreactivation activity ascribed to its interaction with Rad23 linked to WC2 and Phr2 and expands a molecular basis underlying filamentous fungal adaptation to solar UV irradiation on the Earth's surface.

BAP1 promotes the repair of UV-induced DNA damage via PARP1-mediated recruitment to damage sites and control of activity and stability

BRCA1-associated protein-1 (BAP1) is a ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase domain-containing deubiquitinase with tumor suppressor activity. The gene encoding BAP1 is mutated in various human cancers, with particularly high frequency in kidney and skin cancers, and BAP1 is involved in many cancer-related cellular functions, such as DNA repair and genome stability. Although BAP1 stimulates DNA double-strand break repair, whether it functions in nucleotide excision repair (NER) is unknown. Here, we show that BAP1 promotes the repair of ultraviolet (UV)-induced DNA damage via its deubiquitination activity in various cell types, including primary melanocytes. Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) interacts with and recruits BAP1 to damage sites, with BAP1 recruitment peaking after the DDB2 and XPC damage sensors. BAP1 recruitment also requires histone H2A monoubiquitinated at Lys119, which accumulates at damage sites. PARP1 transiently poly(ADP-ribosyl)ates (PARylates) BAP1 at multiple sites after UV damage and stimulates the deubiquitination activity of BAP1 both intrinsically and via PARylation. PARP1 also promotes BAP1 stability via crosstalk between PARylation and ubiquitination. Many PARylation sites in BAP1 are mutated in various human cancers, among which the glutamic acid (Glu) residue at position 31, with particularly frequent mutation in kidney cancer, plays a critical role in BAP1 stabilization and promotes UV-induced DNA damage repair. Glu31 also participates in reducing the viability of kidney cancer cells. This study therefore reveals that BAP1 functions in the NER pathway and that PARP1 plays a role as a novel factor that regulates BAP1 enzymatic activity, protein stability, and recruitment to damage sites. This activity of BAP1 in NER, along with its cancer cell viability-reducing activity, may account for its tumor suppressor function.

A quantitative modelling approach for DNA repair on a population scale

The great advances of sequencing technologies allow the in vivo measurement of nuclear processes-such as DNA repair after UV exposure-over entire cell populations. However, data sets usually contain only a few samples over several hours, missing possibly important information in between time points. We developed a data-driven approach to analyse CPD repair kinetics over time in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In contrast to other studies that consider sequencing signals as an average behaviour, we understand them as the superposition of signals from independent cells. By motivating repair as a stochastic process, we derive a minimal model for which the parameters can be conveniently estimated. We correlate repair parameters to a variety of genomic features that are assumed to influence repair, including transcription rate and nucleosome density. The clearest link was found for the transcription unit length, which has been unreported for budding yeast to our knowledge. The framework hence allows a comprehensive analysis of nuclear processes on a population scale.

Epigenetic Regulation of Nucleotide Excision Repair

Genomic DNA is constantly attacked by a plethora of DNA damaging agents both from endogenous and exogenous sources. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most versatile repair pathway that recognizes and removes a wide range of bulky and/or helix-distorting DNA lesions. Even though the molecular mechanism of NER is well studied through in vitro system, the NER process inside the cell is more complicated because the genomic DNA in eukaryotes is tightly packaged into chromosomes and compacted into a nucleus. Epigenetic modifications regulate gene activity and expression without changing the DNA sequence. The dynamics of epigenetic regulation play a crucial role during the in vivo NER process. In this review, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the epigenetic regulation of NER.

Nucleotide excision repair leaves a mark on chromatin: DNA damage detection in nucleosomes

Global genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) eliminates a broad spectrum of DNA lesions from genomic DNA. Genomic DNA is tightly wrapped around histones creating a barrier for DNA repair proteins to access DNA lesions buried in nucleosomal DNA. The DNA-damage sensors XPC and DDB2 recognize DNA lesions in nucleosomal DNA and initiate repair. The emerging view is that a tight interplay between XPC and DDB2 is regulated by post-translational modifications on the damage sensors themselves as well as on chromatin containing DNA lesions. The choreography between XPC and DDB2, their interconnection with post-translational modifications such as ubiquitylation, SUMOylation, methylation, poly(ADP-ribos)ylation, acetylation, and the functional links with chromatin remodelling activities regulate not only the initial recognition of DNA lesions in nucleosomes, but also the downstream recruitment and necessary displacement of GG-NER factors as repair progresses. In this review, we highlight how nucleotide excision repair leaves a mark on chromatin to enable DNA damage detection in nucleosomes.

Nuclear actin: The new normal

The presence of actin in the nucleus has historically been a highly contentious issue. It is now, however, well accepted that actin has physiologically important roles in the nucleus. In this Review, we describe the evolution of our thinking about actin in the nucleus starting with evidence supporting its involvement in transcription, chromatin remodeling and intranuclear movements. We also review the growing literature on the mechanisms that regulate the import and export of actin and how post-translational modifications of actin could regulate nuclear actin. We end with an extended discussion of the role of nuclear actin in the repair of DNA double stranded breaks.

Histone H4 H75E mutation attenuates global genomic and Rad26-independent transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) consists of global genomic NER (GG-NER) and transcription coupled NER (TC-NER) subpathways. In eukaryotic cells, genomic DNA is wrapped around histone octamers (an H3–H4 tetramer and two H2A–H2B dimers) to form nucleosomes, which are well known to profoundly inhibit the access of NER proteins. Through unbiased screening of histone H4 residues in the nucleosomal LRS (loss of ribosomal DNA-silencing) domain, we identified 24 mutations that enhance or decrease UV sensitivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. The histone H4 H75E mutation, which is largely embedded in the nucleosome and interacts with histone H2B, significantly attenuates GG-NER and Rad26-independent TC-NER but does not affect TC-NER in the presence of Rad26. All the other histone H4 mutations, except for T73F and T73Y that mildly attenuate GG-NER, do not substantially affect GG-NER or TC-NER. The attenuation of GG-NER and Rad26-independent TC-NER by the H4H75E mutation is not due to decreased chromatin accessibility, impaired methylation of histone H3 K79 that is at the center of the LRS domain, or lowered expression of NER proteins. Instead, the attenuation is at least in part due to impaired recruitment of Rad4, the key lesion recognition and verification protein, to chromatin following induction of DNA lesions.

Chromatin Remodeling and Epigenetic Regulation in Plant DNA Damage Repair

DNA damage response (DDR) in eukaryotic cells is initiated in the chromatin context. DNA damage and repair depend on or have influence on the chromatin dynamics associated with genome stability. Epigenetic modifiers, such as chromatin remodelers, histone modifiers, DNA (de-)methylation enzymes, and noncoding RNAs regulate DDR signaling and DNA repair by affecting chromatin dynamics. In recent years, significant progress has been made in the understanding of plant DDR and DNA repair. SUPPRESSOR OF GAMMA RESPONSE1, RETINOBLASTOMA RELATED1 (RBR1)/E2FA, and NAC103 have been proven to be key players in the mediation of DDR signaling in plants, while plant-specific chromatin remodelers, such as DECREASED DNA METHYLATION1, contribute to chromatin dynamics for DNA repair. There is accumulating evidence that plant epigenetic modifiers are involved in DDR and DNA repair. In this review, I examine how DDR and DNA repair machineries are concertedly regulated in Arabidopsis thaliana by a variety of epigenetic modifiers directing chromatin remodeling and epigenetic modification. This review will aid in updating our knowledge on DDR and DNA repair in plants.

Genome maintenance functions of the INO80 chromatin remodeller

Chromatin modification is conserved in all eukaryotes and is required to facilitate and regulate DNA-templated processes. For example, chromatin manipulation, such as histone post-translational modification and nucleosome positioning, play critical roles in genome stability pathways. The INO80 chromatin-remodelling complex, which regulates the abundance and positioning of nucleosomes, is particularly important for proper execution of inducible responses to DNA damage. This review discusses the participation and activity of the INO80 complex in DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint pathways, with emphasis on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system. Furthermore, the role of ATM/ATR kinases, central regulators of DNA damage signalling, in the regulation of INO80 function will be reviewed. In addition, emerging themes of chromatin remodelling in mitotic stability pathways and chromosome segregation will be introduced. These studies are critical to understanding the dynamic chromatin landscape that is rapidly and reversibly modified to maintain the integrity of the genome.This article is part of the themed issue 'Chromatin modifiers and remodellers in DNA repair and signalling'.

Chromatin remodeler CHD1 promotes XPC-to-TFIIH handover of nucleosomal UV lesions in nucleotide excision repair

Ultraviolet (UV) light induces mutagenic cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) in nucleosomal DNA that is tightly wrapped around histone octamers. How global-genome nucleotide excision repair (GG-NER) processes CPDs despite that this chromatin arrangement is poorly understood. An increased chromatin association of CHD1 (chromodomain helicase DNA-binding 1) upon UV irradiation indicated possible roles of this chromatin remodeler in the UV damage response. Immunoprecipitation of chromatin fragments revealed that CHD1 co-localizes in part with GG-NER factors. Chromatin fractionation showed that the UV-dependent recruitment of CHD1 occurs to UV lesions in histone-assembled nucleosomal DNA and that this CHD1 relocation requires the lesion sensor XPC (xeroderma pigmentosum group C). In situ immunofluorescence analyses further demonstrate that CHD1 facilitates substrate handover from XPC to the downstream TFIIH (transcription factor IIH). Consequently, CHD1 depletion slows down CPD excision and sensitizes cells to UV-induced cytotoxicity. The finding of a CHD1-driven lesion handover between sequentially acting GG-NER factors on nucleosomal histone octamers suggests that chromatin provides a recognition scaffold enabling the detection of a subset of CPDs.

Facilitation of base excision repair by chromatin remodeling

Base Excision Repair (BER) is a conserved, intracellular DNA repair system that recognizes and removes chemically modified bases to insure genomic integrity and prevent mutagenesis. Aberrant BER has been tightly linked with a broad spectrum of human pathologies, such as several types of cancer, neurological degeneration, developmental abnormalities, immune dysfunction and aging. In the cell, BER must recognize and remove DNA lesions from the tightly condensed, protein-coated chromatin. Because chromatin is necessarily refractory to DNA metabolic processes, like transcription and replication, the compaction of the genomic material is also inhibitory to the repair systems necessary for its upkeep. Multiple ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling (ACR) complexes play essential roles in modulating the protein-DNA interactions within chromatin, regulating transcription and promoting activities of some DNA repair systems, including double-strand break repair and nucleotide excision repair. However, it remains unclear how BER operates in the context of chromatin, and if the chromatin remodelling processes that govern transcription and replication also actively regulate the efficiency of BER. In this review we highlight the emerging role of ACR in regulation of BER.

INO80 Chromatin Remodeler Facilitates Release of RNA Polymerase II from Chromatin for Ubiquitin-Mediated Proteasomal Degradation

Stalling of RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) on chromatin during transcriptional stress results in polyubiquitination and degradation of the largest subunit of RNAPII, Rpb1, by the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Here, we report that the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complex INO80 is required for turnover of chromatin-bound RNAPII in yeast. INO80 interacts physically and functionally with Cdc48/p97/VCP, a component of UPS required for degradation of RNAPII. Cells lacking INO80 are defective in Rpb1 degradation and accumulate tightly bound ubiquitinated Rpb1 on chromatin. INO80 forms a ternary complex with RNAPII and Cdc48 and targets Rpb1 primed for degradation. The function of INO80 in RNAPII turnover is required for cell growth and survival during genotoxic stress. Our results identify INO80 as a bona fide component of the proteolytic pathway for RNAPII degradation and suggest that INO80 nucleosome remodeling activity promotes the dissociation of ubiquitinated Rpb1 from chromatin to protect the integrity of the genome.

Whole Exome Sequencing Implicates an INO80D Mutation in a Syndrome of Aortic Hypoplasia, Premature Atherosclerosis, and Arterial Stiffness

Background—

Massively parallel, high-throughput sequencing technology is helping to generate new insights into the genetic basis of human diseases. We used whole exome sequencing to identify the mutation underlying a syndrome affecting 2 siblings with aortic hypoplasia, calcific atherosclerosis, systolic hypertension, and premature cataract.

Methods and Results—

Exonic regions were captured and sequenced using a next-generation sequencing platform to generate 100 bases paired-end reads. A computational genomic data analysis pipeline was used to perform quality control, align reads to a reference genome, and identify genetic variants; findings were confirmed using a different exome analyses pipeline. The 2 siblings were homozygous for a rare missense mutation (Ser818Cys) in INO80D , a subunit of the human INO80 chromatin remodeling complex. Homozygosity mapping and Sanger sequencing confirmed that the mutation is located in one of the runs of homozygosity on chromosome 2. INO80D encodes a key subunit of the human IN080 complex, a multiprotein complex involved in DNA binding, chromatin modification, organization of chromosome structure, and ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding. By introducing a new disulphide-bond in the protein product and also disrupting the composition of low-complexity regions, the Ser818Cys mutation may affect INO80D function, protein–protein interactions, and chromatin remodeling.

Conclusions—

Our findings suggest a link between the Ser818Cys mutation in INO80D , a subunit of the human INO80 chromatin remodeling complex, and accelerated arterial aging.

Chromatin modifications and DNA repair: beyond double-strand breaks

DNA repair must take place in the context of chromatin, and chromatin modifications and DNA repair are intimately linked. The study of double-strand break repair has revealed numerous histone modifications that occur after induction of a DSB, and modification of the repair factors themselves can also occur. In some cases the function of the modification is at least partially understood, but in many cases it is not yet clear. Although DSB repair is a crucial activity for cell survival, DSBs account for only a small percentage of the DNA lesions that occur over the lifetime of a cell. Repair of single-strand gaps, nicks, stalled forks, alternative DNA structures, and base lesions must also occur in a chromatin context. There is increasing evidence that these repair pathways are also regulated by histone modifications and chromatin remodeling. In this review, we will summarize the current state of knowledge of chromatin modifications that occur during non-DSB repair, highlighting similarities and differences to DSB repair as well as remaining questions.

UV damage-induced RNA polymerase II stalling stimulates H2B deubiquitylation

Histone H2B monoubiquitylation plays an important role in RNA polymerase II (RNAPII) elongation. Whether this modification responds to RNAPII stalling is not yet known. We report that both yeast and human cells undergo a rapid and significant H2B deubiquitylation after exposure to UV irradiation. This deubiquitylation occurs concurrently with UV-induced transcription arrest and is significantly reduced in a DNA damage-bypassing RNAPII yeast mutant. Consistent with these results, yeast deubiquitylases Ubp8 and Ubp10 are associated with the RNAPII complex. Moreover, simultaneous deletion of Ubp8 and Ubp10 leads to a lack of H2B deubiquitylation after UV exposure. Consequently, nucleotide excision repair at an actively transcribed gene locus is decreased, whereas UV-induced RNAPII degradation is increased in ubp8Δubp10Δ mutant cells. These results indicate that eukaryotic cells respond to RNAPII arrest by deubiquitylating H2B to coordinate DNA repair and RNAPII degradation.

The mammalian INO80 chromatin remodeling complex is required for replication stress recovery

A number of studies have implicated the yeast INO80 chromatin remodeling complex in DNA replication, but the function of the human INO80 complex during S phase remains poorly understood. Here, we have systematically investigated the involvement of the catalytic subunit of the human INO80 complex during unchallenged replication and under replication stress by following the effects of its depletion on cell survival, S-phase checkpoint activation, the fate of individual replication forks, and the consequences of fork collapse. We report that INO80 was specifically needed for efficient replication elongation, while it was not required for initiation of replication. In the absence of the Ino80 protein, cells became hypersensitive to hydroxyurea and displayed hyperactive ATR-Chk1 signaling. Using bulk and fiber labeling of DNA, we found that cells deficient for Ino80 and Arp8 had impaired replication restart after treatment with replication inhibitors and accumulated double-strand breaks as evidenced by the formation of γ-H2AX and Rad51 foci. These data indicate that under conditions of replication stress mammalian INO80 protects stalled forks from collapsing and allows their subsequent restart.

Human ISWI complexes are targeted by SMARCA5 ATPase and SLIDE domains to help resolve lesion-stalled transcription

Chromatin compaction of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) presents a major challenge to the detection and removal of DNA damage. Helix-distorting DNA lesions that block transcription are specifically repaired by transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair, which is initiated by binding of the CSB protein to lesion-stalled RNA polymerase II. Using live cell imaging, we identify a novel function for two distinct mammalian ISWI adenosine triphosphate (ATP)-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes in resolving lesion-stalled transcription. Human ISWI isoform SMARCA5/SNF2H and its binding partners ACF1 and WSTF are rapidly recruited to UV-C induced DNA damage to specifically facilitate CSB binding and to promote transcription recovery. SMARCA5 targeting to UV-C damage depends on transcription and histone modifications and requires functional SWI2/SNF2-ATPase and SLIDE domains. After initial recruitment to UV damage, SMARCA5 re-localizes away from the center of DNA damage, requiring its HAND domain. Our studies support a model in which SMARCA5 targeting to DNA damage-stalled transcription sites is controlled by an ATP-hydrolysis-dependent scanning and proofreading mechanism, highlighting how SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodelers identify and bind nucleosomes containing damaged DNA.

A UV-induced genetic network links the RSC complex to nucleotide excision repair and shows dose-dependent rewiring

Efficient repair of UV-induced DNA damage requires the precise coordination of nucleotide excision repair (NER) with numerous other biological processes. To map this crosstalk, we generated a differential genetic interaction map centered on quantitative growth measurements of >45,000 double mutants before and after different doses of UV radiation. Integration of genetic data with physical interaction networks identified a global map of 89 UV-induced functional interactions among 62 protein complexes, including a number of links between the RSC complex and several NER factors. We show that RSC is recruited to both silenced and transcribed loci following UV damage where it facilitates efficient repair by promoting nucleosome remodeling. Finally, a comparison of the response to high versus low levels of UV shows that the degree of genetic rewiring correlates with dose of UV and reveals a network of dose-specific interactions. This study makes available a large resource of UV-induced interactions, and it illustrates a methodology for identifying dose-dependent interactions based on quantitative shifts in genetic networks.

DNA repair mechanisms and the bypass of DNA damage in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA repair mechanisms are critical for maintaining the integrity of genomic DNA, and their loss is associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae have played a central role in elucidating the highly conserved mechanisms that promote eukaryotic genome stability. This review will focus on repair mechanisms that involve excision of a single strand from duplex DNA with the intact, complementary strand serving as a template to fill the resulting gap. These mechanisms are of two general types: those that remove damage from DNA and those that repair errors made during DNA synthesis. The major DNA-damage repair pathways are base excision repair and nucleotide excision repair, which, in the most simple terms, are distinguished by the extent of single-strand DNA removed together with the lesion. Mistakes made by DNA polymerases are corrected by the mismatch repair pathway, which also corrects mismatches generated when single strands of non-identical duplexes are exchanged during homologous recombination. In addition to the true repair pathways, the postreplication repair pathway allows lesions or structural aberrations that block replicative DNA polymerases to be tolerated. There are two bypass mechanisms: an error-free mechanism that involves a switch to an undamaged template for synthesis past the lesion and an error-prone mechanism that utilizes specialized translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to directly synthesize DNA across the lesion. A high level of functional redundancy exists among the pathways that deal with lesions, which minimizes the detrimental effects of endogenous and exogenous DNA damage.

Nucleotide excision repair in eukaryotes

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the main pathway used by mammals to remove bulky DNA lesions such as those formed by UV light, environmental mutagens, and some cancer chemotherapeutic adducts from DNA. Deficiencies in NER are associated with the extremely skin cancer-prone inherited disorder xeroderma pigmentosum. Although the core NER reaction and the factors that execute it have been known for some years, recent studies have led to a much more detailed understanding of the NER mechanism, how NER operates in the context of chromatin, and how it is connected to other cellular processes such as DNA damage signaling and transcription. This review emphasizes biochemical, structural, cell biological, and genetic studies since 2005 that have shed light on many aspects of the NER pathway.

Histone variant Htz1 promotes histone H3 acetylation to enhance nucleotide excision repair in Htz1 nucleosomes

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is critical for maintaining genome integrity. How chromatin dynamics are regulated to facilitate this process in chromatin is still under exploration. We show here that a histone H2A variant, Htz1 (H2A.Z), in nucleosomes has a positive function in promoting efficient NER in yeast. Htz1 inherently enhances the occupancy of the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5 on chromatin to promote histone H3 acetylation after UV irradiation. Consequently, this results in an increased binding of a NER protein, Rad14, to damaged DNA. Cells without Htz1 show increased UV sensitivity and defective removal of UV-induced DNA damage in the Htz1-bearing nucleosomes at the repressed MFA2 promoter, but not in the HMRa locus where Htz1 is normally absent. Thus, the effect of Htz1 on NER is specifically relevant to its presence in chromatin within a damaged region. The chromatin accessibility to micrococcal nuclease in the MFA2 promoter is unaffected by HTZ1 deletion. Acetylation on previously identified lysines of Htz1 plays little role in NER or cell survival after UV. In summary, we have identified a novel aspect of chromatin that regulates efficient NER, and we provide a model for how Htz1 influences NER in Htz1 nucleosomes.

Relationships between chromatin remodeling and DNA damage repair induced by 8-methoxypsoralen and UVA in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Eukaryotic cells have developed mechanisms to prevent genomic instability, such as DNA damage detection and repair, control of cell cycle progression and cell death induction. The bifunctional compound furocumarin 8-methoxypsoralen (8-MOP) is widely used in the treatment of various inflammatory skin diseases. In this review, we summarize recent data about the role of chromatin remodeling in the repair of DNA damage induced by treatment with 8-methoxypsoralen plus UVA (8-MOP+UVA), focusing on repair proteins in budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, an established model system for studying DNA repair pathways. The interstrand crosslinks (ICL) formed by the 8-MOP+UVA treatment are detrimental lesions that can block transcription and replication, leading to cell death if not repaired. Current data show the involvement of different pathways in ICL processing, such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), translesion repair (TLS) and double-strand break repair. 8-MOP+UVA treatment in yeast enhances the expression of genes involved in the DNA damage response, double strand break repair by homologous replication, as well as genes related to cell cycle regulation. Moreover, alterations in the expression of subtelomeric genes and genes related to chromatin remodeling are consistent with structural modifications of chromatin relevant to DNA repair. Taken together, these findings indicate a specific profile in 8-MOP+UVA responses related to chromatin remodeling and DNA repair.

Shaping chromatin for repair

To counteract the adverse effects of various DNA lesions, cells have evolved an array of diverse repair pathways to restore DNA structure and to coordinate repair with cell cycle regulation. Chromatin changes are an integral part of the DNA damage response, particularly with regard to the types of repair that involve assembly of large multiprotein complexes such as those involved in double strand break (DSB) repair and nucleotide excision repair (NER). A number of phosphorylation, acetylation, methylation, ubiquitylation and chromatin remodeling events modulate chromatin structure at the lesion site. These changes demarcate chromatin neighboring the lesion, afford accessibility and binding surfaces to repair factors and provide on-the-spot means to coordinate repair and damage signaling. Thus, the hierarchical assembly of repair factors at a double strand break is mostly due to their regulated interactions with posttranslational modifications of histones. A large number of chromatin remodelers are required at different stages of DSB repair and NER. Remodelers physically interact with proteins involved in repair processes, suggesting that chromatin remodeling is a requisite for repair factors to access the damaged site. Together, recent findings define the roles of histone post-translational modifications and chromatin remodeling in the DNA damage response and underscore possible differences in the requirements for these events in relation to the chromatin context.

Histone displacement during nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important DNA repair mechanism required for cellular resistance against UV light and toxic chemicals such as those found in tobacco smoke. In living cells, NER efficiently detects and removes DNA lesions within the large nuclear macromolecular complex called chromatin. The condensed nature of chromatin inhibits many DNA metabolizing activities, including NER. In order to promote efficient repair, detection of a lesion not only has to activate the NER pathway but also chromatin remodeling. In general, such remodeling is thought on the one hand to precede NER, thus allowing repair proteins to efficiently access DNA. On the other hand, after completion of the repair, the chromatin must be returned to its previous undamaged state. Chromatin remodeling can refer to three separate but interconnected processes, histone post-translational modifications, insertion of histone variants and histone displacement (including nucleosome sliding). Here we review current knowledge, and speculate about current unknowns, regarding those chromatin remodeling activities that physically displace histones before, during and after NER.

The emerging roles of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes in nucleotide excision repair

DNA repair in eukaryotic cells takes place in the context of chromatin, where DNA, including damaged DNA, is tightly packed into nucleosomes and higher order chromatin structures. Chromatin intrinsically restricts accessibility of DNA repair proteins to the damaged DNA and impacts upon the overall rate of DNA repair. Chromatin is highly responsive to DNA damage and undergoes specific remodeling to facilitate DNA repair. How damaged DNA is accessed, repaired and restored to the original chromatin state, and how chromatin remodeling coordinates these processes in vivo, remains largely unknown. ATP-dependent chromatin remodelers (ACRs) are the master regulators of chromatin structure and dynamics. Conserved from yeast to humans, ACRs utilize the energy of ATP to reorganize packing of chromatin and control DNA accessibility by sliding, ejecting or restructuring nucleosomes. Several studies have demonstrated that ATP-dependent remodeling activity of ACRs plays important roles in coordination of spatio-temporal steps of different DNA repair pathways in chromatin. This review focuses on the role of ACRs in regulation of various aspects of nucleotide excision repair (NER) in the context of chromatin. We discuss current understanding of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by various subfamilies of remodelers and regulation of the NER pathway in vivo.

Interplay between modifications of chromatin and meiotic recombination hotspots

Meiotic recombination lies at the heart of sexual reproduction. It is essential for producing viable gametes with a normal haploid genomic content and its dysfunctions can be at the source of aneuploidies, such as the Down syndrome, or many genetic disorders. Meiotic recombination also generates genetic diversity that is transmitted to progeny by shuffling maternal and paternal alleles along chromosomes. Recombination takes place at non-random chromosomal sites called 'hotspots'. Recent evidence has shown that their location is influenced by properties of chromatin. In addition, many studies in somatic cells have highlighted the need for changes in chromatin dynamics to allow the process of recombination. In this review, we discuss how changes in the chromatin landscape may influence the recombination map, and reciprocally, how recombination events may lead to epigenetic modifications at sites of recombination, which could be transmitted to progeny.

ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in the DNA-damage response

The integrity of DNA is continuously challenged by metabolism-derived and environmental genotoxic agents that cause a variety of DNA lesions, including base alterations and breaks. DNA damage interferes with vital processes such as transcription and replication, and if not repaired properly, can ultimately lead to premature aging and cancer. Multiple DNA pathways signaling for DNA repair and DNA damage collectively safeguard the integrity of DNA. Chromatin plays a pivotal role in regulating DNA-associated processes, and is itself subject to regulation by the DNA-damage response. Chromatin influences access to DNA, and often serves as a docking or signaling site for repair and signaling proteins. Its structure can be adapted by post-translational histone modifications and nucleosome remodeling, catalyzed by the activity of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes. In recent years, accumulating evidence has suggested that ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling complexes play important, although poorly characterized, roles in facilitating the effectiveness of the DNA-damage response. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge on the involvement of ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling in three major DNA repair pathways: nucleotide excision repair, homologous recombination, and non-homologous end-joining. This shows that a surprisingly large number of different remodeling complexes display pleiotropic functions during different stages of the DNA-damage response. Moreover, several complexes seem to have multiple functions, and are implicated in various mechanistically distinct repair pathways.

Epigenetic regulation of genomic integrity

Inefficient and inaccurate repair of DNA damage is the principal cause of DNA mutations, chromosomal aberrations, and carcinogenesis. Numerous multiple-step DNA repair pathways exist whose deployment depends on the nature of the DNA lesion. Common to all eukaryotic DNA repair pathways is the need to unravel the compacted chromatin structure to facilitate access of the repair machinery to the DNA and restoration of the original chromatin state afterward. Accordingly, our cells utilize a plethora of coordinated mechanisms to locally open up the chromatin structure to reveal the underlying DNA sequence and to orchestrate the efficient and accurate repair of DNA lesions. Here we review changes to the chromatin structure that are intrinsic to the DNA damage response and the available mechanistic insight into how these chromatin changes facilitate distinct stages of the DNA damage repair pathways to maintain genomic stability.

The RSC and INO80 chromatin-remodeling complexes in DNA double-strand break repair

In eukaryotes, DNA is packaged into chromatin and is therefore relatively inaccessible to DNA repair enzymes. In order to perform efficient DNA repair, ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling enzymes are required to alter the chromatin structure near the site of damage to facilitate processing and allow access to repair enzymes. Two of the best-studied remodeling complexes involved in repair are RSC (Remodels the Structure of Chromatin) and INO80 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which are both conserved in higher eukaryotes. RSC is very rapidly recruited to breaks and mobilizes nucleosomes to promote phosphorylation of H2A S129 and resection. INO80 enrichment at a break occurs later and is dependent on phospho-S129 H2A. INO80 activity at the break site also facilitates resection. Consequently, both homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining are defective in rsc mutants, while subsets of these repair pathways are affected in ino80 mutants.

ASF1A and ATM regulate H3K56-mediated cell-cycle checkpoint recovery in response to UV irradiation

Successful DNA repair within chromatin requires coordinated interplay of histone modifications, chaperones and remodelers for allowing access of repair and checkpoint machineries to damaged sites. Upon completion of repair, ordered restoration of chromatin structure and key epigenetic marks herald the cell's normal function. Here, we demonstrate such a restoration role of H3K56 acetylation (H3K56Ac) mark in response to ultraviolet (UV) irradiation of human cells. A fast initial deacetylation of H3K56 is followed by full renewal of an acetylated state at ~24-48 h post-irradiation. Histone chaperone, anti-silencing function-1 A (ASF1A), is crucial for post-repair H3K56Ac restoration, which in turn, is needed for the dephosphorylation of γ-H2AX and cellular recovery from checkpoint arrest. On the other hand, completion of DNA damage repair is not dependent on ASF1A or H3K56Ac. H3K56Ac restoration is regulated by ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) checkpoint kinase. These cross-talking molecular cellular events reveal the important pathway components influencing the regulatory function of H3K56Ac in the recovery from UV-induced checkpoint arrest.

Nucleotide excision repair in chromatin: damage removal at the drop of a HAT

In an earlier review of our understanding of the mechanism of nucleotide excision repair (NER) we examined the process with respect to how it occurs in chromatin [1]. We described how much of our mechanistic understanding of NER was derived from biochemical studies that analysed the repair reaction in DNA substrates not representative of that which exists in the living cell. We pointed out that our efforts to understand how NER operates in chromatin had been hampered in part because of the well-known inhibition of NER that occurs when DNA is assembled into nucleosomes and used as the substrate to examine the repair reaction in vitro. Despite this technical bottleneck, we summarized the biochemical, genetic and cell-based studies which have provided insights into the molecular mechanism of NER in the cellular context. More recently, we revisited the topic of how UV induced DNA damage is repaired in chromatin. In this review we examined the commonly held view that depicts a struggle in which the DNA repair machinery battles to overcome the inhibitory effect of chromatin during the repair process. We suggested that in this interpretation of events, the DNA repair mechanisms might be described as 'tilting at windmills': fighting an imaginary foe [2]. We surmised that this scenario was overly simplistic, and we described an emerging picture in which the DNA repair process and chromatin remodeling were mechanistically linked and were in fact functioning cooperatively to organize the efficient removal of DNA damage from the genome. Here we discuss the latest findings, which contribute to the idea that DNA damage induced changes to chromatin represent an important way in which the DNA repair process is initiated and organized throughout the genome to promote the efficient removal of damage in response to UV radiation.