Accessibility of targeted DHPR sites to streptavidin and functional effects of binding on EC coupling

Core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor calcium release complex

The core skeletal muscle ryanodine receptor (RyR1) calcium release complex extends through three compartments of the muscle fibre, linking the extracellular environment through the cytoplasmic junctional gap to the lumen of the internal sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) calcium store. The protein complex is essential for skeletal excitation-contraction (EC)-coupling and skeletal muscle function. Its importance is highlighted by perinatal death if any one of the EC-coupling components are missing and by myopathies associated with mutation of any of the proteins. The proteins essential for EC-coupling include the DHPR α_1S subunit in the transverse tubule membrane, the DHPR β_1a subunit in the cytosol and the RyR1 ion channel in the SR membrane. The other core proteins are triadin and junctin and calsequestrin, associated mainly with SR. These SR proteins are not essential for survival but exert structural and functional influences that modify the gain of EC-coupling and maintain normal muscle function. This review summarises our current knowledge of the individual protein/protein interactions within the core complex and their overall contribution to EC-coupling. We highlight significant areas that provide a continuing challenge for the field. Additional important components of the Ca²⁺ release complex, such as FKBP12, calmodulin, S100A1 and Stac3 are identified and reviewed elsewhere.

Bridging the myoplasmic gap II: more recent advances in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, excitation-contraction (EC) coupling relies on the transmission of an intermolecular signal from the voltage-sensing regions of the L-type Ca(2+) channel (Ca(V)1.1) in the plasma membrane to the channel pore of the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) nearly 10 nm away in the membrane of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). Even though the roles of Ca(V)1.1 and RyR1 as voltage sensor and SR Ca(2+) release channel, respectively, have been established for nearly 25 years, the mechanism underlying communication between these two channels remains undefined. In the course of this article, I will review current viewpoints on this topic with particular emphasis on recent studies.

Three-dimensional localization of the α and β subunits and of the II-III loop in the skeletal muscle L-type Ca2+ channel

The L-type Ca(2+) channel (dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in skeletal muscle acts as the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling. To better resolve the spatial organization of the DHPR subunits (α(1s) or Ca(V)1.1, α(2), β(1a), δ1, and γ), we created transgenic mice expressing a recombinant β(1a) subunit with YFP and a biotin acceptor domain attached to its N- and C- termini, respectively. DHPR complexes were purified from skeletal muscle, negatively stained, imaged by electron microscopy, and subjected to single-particle image analysis. The resulting 19.1-Å resolution, three-dimensional reconstruction shows a main body of 17 × 11 × 8 nm with five corners along its perimeter. Two protrusions emerge from either face of the main body: the larger one attributed to the α(2)-δ1 subunit that forms a flexible hook-shaped feature and a smaller protrusion on the opposite side that corresponds to the II-III loop of Ca(V)1.1 as revealed by antibody labeling. Novel features discernible in the electron density accommodate the atomic coordinates of a voltage-gated sodium channel and of the β subunit in a single docking possibility that defines the α1-β interaction. The β subunit appears more closely associated to the membrane than expected, which may better account for both its role in localizing the α(1s) subunit to the membrane and its suggested role in excitation-contraction coupling.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) indicates that association with the type I ryanodine receptor (RyR1) causes reorientation of multiple cytoplasmic domains of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) α(1S) subunit

The skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) in the t-tubular membrane serves as the Ca(2+) channel and voltage sensor for excitation-contraction (EC) coupling, triggering Ca(2+) release via the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) in the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR). The two proteins appear to be physically linked, and both the α(1S) and β(1a) subunits of the DHPR are essential for EC coupling. Within α(1S), cytoplasmic domains of importance include the I-II loop (to which β(1a) binds), the II-III and III-IV loops, and the C terminus. However, the spatial relationship of these domains to one another has not been established. Here, we have taken the approach of measuring FRET between fluorescent proteins inserted into pairs of α(1S) cytoplasmic domains. Expression of these constructs in dyspedic (RyR1 null) and dysgenic (α(1S) null) myotubes was used to test for function and targeting to plasma membrane/SR junctions and to test whether the presence of RyR1 caused altered FRET. We found that in the absence of RyR1, measureable FRET occurred between the N terminus and C terminus (residue 1636), and between the II-III loop (residue 626) and both the N and C termini; the I-II loop (residue 406) showed weak FRET with the II-III loop but not with the N terminus. Association with RyR1 caused II-III loop FRET to decrease with the C terminus and increase with the N terminus and caused I-II loop FRET to increase with both the II-III loop and N terminus. Overall, RyR1 appears to cause a substantial reorientation of the cytoplasmic α(1S) domains consistent with their becoming more closely packed.

Ca(V)1.1: The atypical prototypical voltage-gated Ca²⁺ channel

Ca(V)1.1 is the prototype for the other nine known Ca(V) channel isoforms, yet it has functional properties that make it truly atypical of this group. Specifically, Ca(V)1.1 is expressed solely in skeletal muscle where it serves multiple purposes; it is the voltage sensor for excitation-contraction coupling and it is an L-type Ca²⁺ channel which contributes to a form of activity-dependent Ca²⁺ entry that has been termed Excitation-coupled Ca²⁺ entry. The ability of Ca(V)1.1 to serve as voltage-sensor for excitation-contraction coupling appears to be unique among Ca(V) channels, whereas the physiological role of its more conventional function as a Ca²⁺ channel has been a matter of uncertainty for nearly 50 years. In this chapter, we discuss how Ca(V)1.1 supports excitation-contraction coupling, the possible relevance of Ca²⁺ entry through Ca(V)1.1 and how alterations of Ca(V)1.1 function can have pathophysiological consequences. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Calcium channels.

Bimolecular fluorescence complementation and targeted biotinylation provide insight into the topology of the skeletal muscle Ca ( 2+) channel β1a subunit

In skeletal muscle, L-type calcium channels (DHPRs), localized to plasma membrane sarcoplasmic reticulum junctions, are tightly packed into groups of four termed tetrads. Here, we have used bimolecular fluorescence complementation (BiFC) and targeted biotinylation to probe the structure and organization of β1a subunits associated with native CaV 1.1 in DHPRs of myotubes. The construct YN-β1a-YC, in which the non-fluorescent fragments of YFP ("YN" corresponding to YFP residues 1-158, and "YC" corresponding to YFP residues 159-238) were fused, respectively, to the N- and C-termini of β1a, was fully functional and displayed yellow fluorescence within DHPR tetrads after expression in β1-knockout (β1KO) myotubes; this yellow fluorescence demonstrated the occurrence of BiFC of YN and YC on the β1a N- and C-termini. In these experiments, we avoided overexpression because control experiments in non-muscle cells indicated that this could result in non-specific BiFC. BiFC of YN-β1a-YC in DHPR tetrads appeared to be intramolecular between N- and C-termini of individual β1a subunits rather than between adjacent DHPRs because BiFC (1) was observed for YN-β1a-YC co-expressed with CaV 1.2 (which does not form tetrads) and (2) was not observed after co-expression of YN-β1a-YN plus YC-β1a-YC in β1KO myotubes. Thus, β1a function is compatible with N- and C-termini being close enough together to allow BiFC. However, both termini appeared to have positional freedom and not to be closely opposed by other junctional proteins since both were accessible to gold-streptavidin conjugates. Based on these results, a model is proposed for the arrangement of β1a subunits in DHPR tetrads.

Reciprocal dihydropyridine and ryanodine receptor interactions in skeletal muscle activation

Dihydropyridine (DHPR) and ryanodine receptors (RyRs) are central to transduction of transverse (T) tubular membrane depolarisation initiated by surface action potentials into release of sarcoplasmic reticular (SR) Ca2+ in skeletal muscle excitation-contraction coupling. Electronmicroscopic methods demonstrate an orderly positioning of such tubular DHPRs relative to RyRs in the SR at triad junctions where their membranes come into close proximity. Biochemical and genetic studies associated expression of specific, DHPR and RyR, isoforms with the particular excitation-contraction coupling processes and related elementary Ca2+ release events found respectively in skeletal and cardiac muscle. Physiological studies of intramembrane charge movements potentially related to voltage triggering of Ca2+ release demonstrated a particular qγ charging species identifiable with DHPRs through its T-tubular localization, pharmacological properties, and steep voltage-dependence paralleling Ca2+ release. Its nonlinear kinetics implicated highly co-operative conformational events in its transitions in response to voltage change. The effects of DHPR and RyR agonists and antagonists upon this intramembrane charge in turn implicated reciprocal rather than merely unidirectional DHPR-RyR interactions in these complex reactions. Thus, following membrane potential depolarization, an orthograde qγ-DHPR-RyR signaling likely initiates conformational alterations in the RyR with which it makes contact. The latter changes could then retrogradely promote further qγ-DHPR transitions through reciprocal co-operative allosteric interactions between receptors. These would relieve the resting constraints on both further, delayed, nonlinear qγ-DHPR charge transfers and on RyR-mediated Ca2+ release. They would also explain the more rapid charging and recovery qγ transients following larger depolarizations and membrane potential repolarization to the resting level.

Effects of inserting fluorescent proteins into the alpha1S II-III loop: insights into excitation-contraction coupling

In skeletal muscle, intermolecular communication between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and RYR1 is bidirectional: orthograde coupling (skeletal excitation-contraction coupling) is observed as depolarization-induced Ca(2+) release via RYR1, and retrograde coupling is manifested by increased L-type Ca(2+) current via DHPR. A critical domain (residues 720-765) of the DHPR alpha(1S) II-III loop plays an important but poorly understood role in bidirectional coupling with RYR1. In this study, we examine the consequences of fluorescent protein insertion into different positions within the alpha(1S) II-III loop. In four constructs, a cyan fluorescent protein (CFP)-yellow fluorescent protein (YFP) tandem was introduced in place of residues 672-685 (the peptide A region). All four constructs supported efficient bidirectional coupling as determined by the measurement of L-type current and myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients. In contrast, insertion of a CFP-YFP tandem within the N-terminal portion of the critical domain (between residues 726 and 727) abolished bidirectional signaling. Bidirectional coupling was partially preserved when only a single YFP was inserted between residues 726 and 727. However, insertion of YFP near the C-terminal boundary of the critical domain (between residues 760 and 761) or in the conserved C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop (between residues 785 and 786) eliminated bidirectional coupling. None of the fluorescent protein insertions, even those that interfered with signaling, significantly altered membrane expression or targeting. Thus, bidirectional signaling is ablated by insertions at two different sites in the C-terminal portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop. Significantly, our results indicate that the conserved portion of the alpha(1S) II-III loop C terminal to the critical domain plays an important role in bidirectional coupling either by conveying conformational changes to the critical domain from other regions of the DHPR or by serving as a site of interaction with other junctional proteins such as RYR1.

The alpha(1S) III-IV loop influences 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor gating but is not directly involved in excitation-contraction coupling interactions with the type 1 ryanodine receptor

In skeletal muscle, coupling between the 1,4-dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) and the type 1 ryanodine receptor (RyR1) underlies excitation-contraction (EC) coupling. The III-IV loop of the DHPR alpha(1S) subunit binds to a segment of RyR1 in vitro, and mutations in the III-IV loop alter the voltage dependence of EC coupling, raising the possibility that this loop is directly involved in signal transmission from the DHPR to RyR1. To clarify the role of the alpha(1S) III-IV loop in EC coupling, we examined the functional properties of a chimera (GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa]) in which the III-IV loop of the divergent alpha(1A) isoform replaced that of alpha(1S). Dysgenic myotubes expressing GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] yielded myoplasmic Ca(2+) transients that activated at approximately 10 mV more hyperpolarized potentials and that were approximately 65% smaller than those of GFP-alpha(1S). A similar reduction was observed in voltage-dependent charge movements for GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa], indicating that the chimeric channels trafficked less well to the membrane but that those that were in the membrane functioned as efficiently in EC coupling as GFP-alpha(1S). Relative to GFP-alpha(1S), L-type currents mediated by GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] were approximately 40% smaller and activated at approximately 5 mV more hyperpolarized potentials. The altered gating of GFP-alpha(1S)[III-IVa] was accentuated by exposure to +/-Bay K 8644, which caused a much larger hyperpolarizing shift in activation compared with its effect on GFP-alpha(1S). Taken together, our observations indicate that the alpha(1S) III-IV loop is not directly involved in EC coupling but does influence DHPR gating transitions important both for EC coupling and activation of L-type conductance.

Sequence differences in the IQ motifs of CaV1.1 and CaV1.2 strongly impact calmodulin binding and calcium-dependent inactivation

The proximal C terminus of the cardiac L-type calcium channel (Ca(V)1.2) contains structural elements important for the binding of calmodulin (CaM) and calcium-dependent inactivation, and exhibits extensive sequence conservation with the corresponding region of the skeletal L-type channel (Ca(V)1.1). However, there are several Ca(V)1.1 residues that are both identical in six species and are non-conservatively changed from the corresponding Ca(V)1.2 residues, including three of the "IQ motif." To investigate the functional significance of these residue differences, we used native gel electrophoresis and expression in intact myotubes to compare the binding of CaM to extended regions (up to 300 residues) of the C termini of Ca(V)1.1 and Ca(V)1.2. We found that in the presence of Ca(2+) (either millimolar or that in resting myotubes), CaM bound strongly to C termini of Ca(V)1.2 but not of Ca(V)1.1. Furthermore, replacement of two residues (Tyr(1657) and Lys(1662)) within the IQ motif of a C-terminal Ca(V)1.2 construct with the divergent residues of Ca(V)1.1 (His(1532) and Met(1537)) led to a weakening of CaM binding (native gels), whereas the reciprocal substitution in Ca(V)1.1 caused a gain of CaM binding. In full-length Ca(V)1.2, substitution of these same two divergent residues with those of Ca(V)1.1 (Y1657H, K1662M) eliminated calcium-dependent inactivation of the heterologously expressed channel. Thus, our results reveal that a conserved difference between the IQ motifs of Ca(V)1.2 and Ca(V)1.1 has a profound effect on both CaM binding and calcium-dependent inactivation.

A dihydropyridine receptor alpha1s loop region critical for skeletal muscle contraction is intrinsically unstructured and binds to a SPRY domain of the type 1 ryanodine receptor

The II-III loop of the dihydropyridine receptor (DHPR) alpha(1s) subunit is a modulator of the ryanodine receptor (RyR1) Ca(2+) release channel in vitro and is essential for skeletal muscle contraction in vivo. Despite its importance, the structure of this loop has not been reported. We have investigated its structure using a suite of NMR techniques which revealed that the DHPR II-III loop is an intrinsically unstructured protein (IUP) and as such belongs to a burgeoning structural class of functionally important proteins. The loop does not possess a stable tertiary fold: it is highly flexible, with a strong N-terminal helix followed by nascent helical/turn elements and unstructured segments. Its residual structure is loosely globular with the N and C termini in close proximity. The unstructured nature of the II-III loop may allow it to easily modify its interaction with RyR1 following a surface action potential and thus initiate rapid Ca(2+) release and contraction. The in vitro binding partner for the II-III was investigated. The II-III loop interacts with the second of three structurally distinct SPRY domains in RyR1, whose function is unknown. This interaction occurs through two preformed N-terminal alpha-helical regions and a C-terminal hydrophobic element. The A peptide corresponding to the helical N-terminal region is a common probe of RyR function and binds to the same SPRY domain as the full II-III loop. Thus the second SPRY domain is an in vitro binding site for the II-III loop. The possible in vivo role of this region is discussed.