Guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia: a tale of 2 countries

Comparison of the new InoDiag automated fluorescence multiplexed antigen microarray to the reference technique in the serodiagnosis of atypical bacterial pneumonia

The aetiological diagnosis of pneumonia depends largely on culture-, antigen- or PCR-based tests. Atypical agents of pneumonia include Coxiella burnetii, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, Chlamydia psittaci, Legionella pneumophila, Francisella tularensis and Mycoplasma pneumoniae. In these cases, serological tests are commonly used for diagnosis. All of the above species were comparatively screened for by using the InoDiag multiplexed automatic immunofluorescence assay and established reference techniques. The InoDiag assay required 5 microL of serum, took 76 min per serum sample, and required an incubator, a fluorescence reader and interpretation software. In total, 248 single sera from patients were tested, for the diagnosis of pneumonia, and the results obtained with selected serum samples were compared with results obtained with the reference method. It was shown that, for the detection of Coxiella burnetii IgM, the automated assay had a sensitivity and specificity of 100%. For the detection of M. pneumoniae IgM, sensitivity was 100% and specificity was 98%. For the detection of Chlamydophila pneumoniae and Chlamydia psittaci IgG, sensitivity was 81% and specificity was 94%. For the detection of L. pneumoniae IgG, sensitivity was 63% and specificity was 98%. For the detection of F. tularensis IgG and IgM, sensitivity was 100% for both, and specificity was 95% and 100%, respectively. The performance of this serological assay was comparable to that of other assays reported in the literature. This preliminary study shows that the automatic InoDiag assay opens the way to immunofluorescence assay standardization.

A patient with fulminant influenza-related bacterial pneumonia due to Streptococcus pneumoniae followed by Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

A 74-year-old man with poorly controlled diabetes mellitus was admitted to our hospital because of severe respiratory disturbance, fever, and sputum. We found massive consolidation of the right lung and nodular shadows on the left lung on chest X-ray, and detected influenza virus and Streptococcus pneumoniae antigen from a nasopharyngeal swab and urine sample, respectively. Co-infection with influenza virus and bacteria was suspected, and oseltamivir and biapenem were prescribed. Laboratory data improved after the addition of sivelestat sodium hydrate, an inhibitor of neutrophil-derived elastase; however, chest X-ray findings became worse on Day 8, and we administered 1 g methylprednisolone intravenously for two days. On Day 12, we detected Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the sputum, even though we did not previously detect any acid-fast bacilli, and started anti-tuberculosis drugs, such as isoniazid, rifampicin, ethambutol hydrochloride, and pyrazinamide; however, the patient died 12 days later. Severe influenza-related bacterial pneumonia with Streptococcus pneumoniae and subsequently secondary tuberculosis infection were finally suspected in this case. This was a very rare case in which additional tuberculosis infection was found in a patient with fulminant pneumonia due to co-infection of influenza virus and bacteria. It is necessary to observe patients with influenza carefully, especially when steroids are used, even if antibiotics are also administered.

Pneumonia a Legionella – A propósito de um caso clínico

Legionella, as a cause of community-acquired pneumonia, is probably under-recognized because the diagnosis relies on the use of specific tests as well the existence of an in-numerous species and serogroups not easily identify by the tests available. In studies from Europe and North America, it ranged from 2 to 15 percent of all community-acquired pneumonias that required hospitalisation, in the first four causes when culture methods were done and the second cause of those admitted in the intensive care units. We do a case report of 43 year-old man with history of cigarette smoking and corticosteroid therapy for a ocular disease, that presents with a pneumonia complicated with a Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), that leaded to his admission to an intensive care unit were he was mechanical ventilated. The epidemiological investigation identified Legionella pneumophila serogroup 1. The authors present this case doing a brief review of this disease and discussing the epidemiology, clinical features, laboratory diagnosis as well as therapeutic options.

Efficacy and safety of sequential moxifloxacin for treatment of community-acquired pneumonia associated with atypical pathogens

In two prospective, randomized studies intravenous (IV)/oral (PO) moxifloxacin (400 mg q.i.d.) was compared to IV/PO antimicrobial comparator agents for the treatment of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Reported here are the pooled data for the sub-population with atypical pathogens. Of 101 intent-to-treat patients with atypical pathogens, a total of 39 moxifloxacin-treated and 47 comparator-treated subjects were microbiologically valid and included in the analysis. Clinical and bacteriological success rates were 95% for the moxifloxacin-treated and 94% for the comparator-treated subjects at the test-of-cure visit. The results indicate IV/PO moxifloxacin (400 mg q.i.d.) is an effective monotherapy for patients with CAP due to atypical pathogens.

Pathogen of occurrence and susceptibility patterns associated with pneumonia in hospitalized patients in North America: results of the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Study (2000)

Antimicrobial selection for patients diagnosed with pneumonia is a major therapeutic challenge and dilemma to the clinical practitioner. In the community setting, patients usually receive empiric oral therapy based upon multiple patient risk factors and locally prevalent pathogen susceptibilities. For patients admitted to the hospital with pneumonia, or who acquire pneumonia while in the hospital, therapy can be initially empiric and then become directed once culture and susceptibility results are known. The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program since 1997, has monitored pathogen frequency and antimicrobial susceptibilities in hospitalized patients with pneumonia in North America. In this Study 2,712 pathogens were studied from 30 medical centers (25 in the United States and 5 in Canada). Over 30 species of organisms were recovered with Staphylococcus aureus comprising 28.0% of all isolates and with four other species (Pseudomonas aeruginosa 20.0%, Streptococcus pneumoniae 9.1%, Klebsiella spp. 7.5% and Haemophilus influenzae 7.3%) constituted 71.9% of isolates submitted. Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant S. aureus accounted for 43.7% of all S. aureus isolates. Antimicrobials demonstrating significant (>80%) activity against S. aureus were: chloramphenicol (81.6%), tetracycline (91.4%), rifampin (96.4%) and quinupristin/dalfopristin (99.7%); and no isolate was resistant to glycopeptides or linezolid. North American isolates of P. aeruginosa were most susceptible to amikacin (93.7%) > tobramycin (90.2%) > meropenem (89.1%) > imipenem = piperacillin/tazobactam (85.6%) > piperacillin (82.1%) > cefepime (80.5%). Overall, 32.1% of S. pneumoniae were penicillin non-susceptible while erythromycin susceptibility was only 74.8%. Fluoroquinolones and recent generation cephalosporins retained excellent activity (gatifloxacin [99.2%] > levofloxacin = cefepime [98.8%] > ceftriaxone [97.2%]) against S. pneumoniae. Klebsiella spp. were 100.0% susceptible to the carbapenems (meropenem and imipenem) but extended spectrum beta-lactamases were detected at a rate of 5.4%. The beta-lactamase-positive rate in H. influenzae was 28.6% in North America (71.4% ampicillin-susceptible). The SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program continues to identify important North American patterns of pathogen frequency and resistance. Additionally, the provision of multi-year longitudinal data and associated reports allow for comparisons, which function as critical tools for effective patient management and antimicrobial interventions.

Bacterial resistance--the clinical challenge

Resistance to antibacterial agents has increased among many species of bacterial pathogens in the last two decades. While this has been recognized and has been a matter of concern among those concerned with infectious diseases, it is only relatively recently that prescribing physicians have become aware of the problem. A range of official bodies, both national and international, have proposed a range of strategies for controlling this increase in resistance. The relationship between resistance and clinical efficacy or failure is unclear in many areas, although increasingly resistance can be seen to be associated with a less than optimal clinical response. Although the relationship between antibiotic use and resistance is complex, there is an assumption that excessive use of antibacterials may drive an increase in resistance. The term 'prudent prescribing' is frequently used in official documents, but it is not easy for the prescriber to determine exactly what is prudent prescribing. There have been efforts to reduce the unnecessary use of antibacterials in the treatment of many community respiratory infections where the etiological agent is likely to be viral. Guidelines for prescribing have been drawn up by governments and professional societies but their impact can be variable. They need to take account of the changing patterns of resistance, for example the rise in high-level penicillin resistance among pneumococci. They also need to be readily accessible to the practicing clinician. Surveillance systems are available in abundance and these may be local, national, or international. They often, however, suffer from drawbacks and are frequently selective. Frequently the prescriber does not have ready access to the most appropriate data. Integrated strategies to control resistance are urgently needed, as are improved rapid diagnostic facilities.

Association between initial empirical therapy and decreased length of stay among veteran patients hospitalized with community acquired pneumonia

This investigation assessed the impact of initial empirical antimicrobial therapy on the outcome of therapy for community acquired pneumonia (CAP) patients and on patients' length of stay (LOS) in the hospital. Hospital records for 165 patients with pneumonia admitted to the Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital between 1 October 1997, and 31 March 2000, were reviewed. Criteria for CAP were met for 92 of 165 patients. Comparisons were made between patients treated with azithromycin and with other parenteral antibiotics (the reference group). No statistical differences were observed between the treatment groups for the risk factors. The azithromycin group patients were slightly older with a mean age of 69 years versus 66 years (P=0.23). Patients treated with parenteral azithromycin had on average, a shorter length of hospitalization namely 4.6 days compared with 9.7 days for patients treated with the other antibiotics (log-rank test, P=0.0001). In order to make the two groups of patients more alike we considered patients' data set without intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. The conclusion was the same namely azithromycin monotherapy was associated with a decreased duration of hospital stay.

The emerging role of atypical pathogens in community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) constitutes a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Although Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the bacterium most commonly implicated in CAP, the atypical respiratory pathogens Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Legionella species, and Chlamydia pneumoniae are being isolated with increasing frequency Contrary to previous beliefs, these agents are capable of causing severe as well as mild-to-moderate illness. Moreover, they can affect all age groups. Indeed, atypical pathogens are implicated in up to 40% of CAP cases and commonly occur as copathogens in mixed-infection CAP, an etiology associated with particularly high mortality (up to 25%). Laboratory methods for detecting atypical pathogens are slow, and there is significant overlap between atypical and typical CAP manifestations. For these reasons, accurate prediction of etiology cannot be made purely on clinical or radiologic grounds. Consequently, empiric antimicrobial therapy for atypical pathogens (with agents such as macrolides, fluoroquinolones, in some cases tetracyclines, or the new ketolides) warrants careful consideration and now is recommended for the treatment of CAP.