Neutralizing antibody response against human cytomegalovirus in allogeneic bone marrow-transplant recipients

Cell therapy for cytomegalovirus infection

INTRODUCTION

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is widely prevalent but mostly harmless in immunocompetent individuals. In the post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) setting unrestricted viral replication can cause end-organ damage (CMV disease) and, in a small proportion, mortality. Current management strategies are based on sensitive surveillance programmes, with the more recent introduction of an effective prophylactic antiviral drug, letermovir, but all aim to bridge patients until reconstitution of endogenous immunity is sufficient to constrain viral replication.

AREAS COVERED

Over the past 25 years, the adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T-cells has developed from the first proof of concept transfer of CD 8 + T-cell clones, to the development of 'off the shelf' third party derived Viral-Specific T-cells (VSTs). In this review, we cover the current management of CMV, and discuss the developments in CMV adoptive cellular therapy.

EXPERT OPINION

Due to the adoption of letermovir as a prophylaxis in standard therapy, the incidence of CMV reactivation is likely to decrease, and any widely adopted cellular therapy needs to be economically competitive. Current clinical trials will help to identify the patients most likely to gain the maximum benefit from any form of cell therapy.

CMV-specific immune reconstitution following allogeneic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains a major contributor to morbidity and mortality following allogeneic haemopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) despite widespread use of viraemia monitoring and pre-emptive antiviral therapy. Uncontrolled viral replication occurs primarily in the first 100 d post transplant but this high risk period can extend to many months if immune recovery is delayed. The re-establishment of a functional population of cellular effectors is essential for control of virus replication and depends on recipient and donor serostatus, the stem cell source, degree of HLA matching and post-transplant factors such as CMV antigen exposure, presence of GVHD and ongoing use of immune suppression. A number of immune monitoring assays exist but have not yet become widely accessible for routine clinical use. Vaccination, adoptive transfer of CMV specific T cells and a number of graft engineering processes are being evaluated to enhance of CMV specific immune recovery post HSCT.

Lack of antibodies against the antigen domain 2 epitope of cytomegalovirus (CMV) glycoprotein B is associated with CMV disease after renal transplantation in recipients having the same glycoprotein H serotypes as their donors

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reinfection of seropositive individuals has been associated with adverse outcomes in organ transplantation and is a frequent cause of congenital infection. Previously we demonstrated that mismatching of CMV glycoprotein H (gH) serotypes was associated with CMV disease after renal transplantation. Because the antigen domain 2 (AD2) epitope of glycoprotein B (gB) is conserved among CMV isolates and is one of the known targets of neutralizing antibodies, in this study we investigated whether antibodies against the epitope contribute to protection from CMV reinfection in renal transplantation, irrespective of gH serological matching. For this purpose, the gB and gH serology and clinical outcomes were analyzed retrospectively for 77 transplant recipients in the donor positive/recipient positive setting, who were managed by preemptive strategy. We found that there was a good negative correlation between the numbers of antigenemia-positive cells and the levels of antibodies against gB AD2 in the CMV-gH antibody matched group, but not in the CMV-gH antibody mismatched group. None of the recipients with antibodies against both gB AD2 and strain-specific epitopes of gH have experienced CMV disease during 6 month after transplantation, while 28% of those who lacked either/both antibody response needed preemptive therapy. Because the outcome was statistically significant, antibodies against gB AD2 can be a useful indicator to predict emergence of CMV disease for preemptive therapy, in addition to antibodies against the mismatched gH types.

Vaccine strategies against human cytomegalovirus infection

Human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) disease is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in neonates and immunocompromised populations, such as transplant recipients and HIV-infected patients. The development of a vaccine to prevent HCMV infection or disease has been assigned the highest priority by the US Institute of Medicine. Although, after 30 years of intensive study, a clinically licensed vaccine is still not available, significant progress has been made in the field of HCMV vaccine development, along with greater understanding of HCMV immunology, molecular biology and pathology. In recent years, new vaccine strategies have been developed that have shown promising results in preclinical studies and are able to induce HCMV-specific immune responses in clinical studies, although efficacy data are not yet available. Here we review the history of HCMV vaccine development and the current strategies in the development of new HCMV vaccines. We propose that research should focus on the development of a vaccine to prevent or control HCMV-related disease rather than to prevent infection, and that discerning strategies should be used for targeting HCMV disease in different clinical settings.

The role of immune reconstitution in cytomegalovirus infection

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) causes high morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. The host immune response to CMV comprises specific and nonspecific cellular and humoral responses, but current knowledge supports a protective role only for cell-mediated immune responses. Although complete CMV eradication is unusual even in immunocompetent hosts, its morbidity can be limited by CMV-specific CD8+ cytotoxic lymphocytes supported by CD4+-mediated T lymphocyte helper activity. In patients with congenital or acquired deficiencies of cell-mediated immunity, recovery of CD4+ lymphocyte numbers and/or function coincides with cessation of CMV-associated morbidity. However, an immunological test that can predict protection against CMV disease across different types of high-risk patients is not yet available. In recent years, the introduction of antivirals active against CMV has improved the outcome of CMV disease. In addition, there is a continuous effort to develop CMV-specific immune-based therapies including vaccines and immune modulators such as cytokines, which may be of supplemental benefit in the control of CMV disease.

Identification of immune dominant cytomegalovirus epitopes using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reactions to measure interferon-gamma production by peptide-stimulated peripheral blood mononuclear cells

The identification of HLA restricted immune dominant cytotoxic T cell (CTL) epitopes limits immune therapy. Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains a significant cause of morbidity after allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Adoptive immune therapy using CTLs stimulated with immune dominant CMV pp65 peptides may be effective in preventing CMV disease, but immune dominant CMV peptides have been identified for only a few HLA class I molecules. The purpose of this study was to use a novel molecular system to establish a rapid and precise method to identify new HLA-restricted CMV epitopes. Cytomegalovirus pp65 peptides expected to bind to the HLA-24 molecule were identified with a computer algorithm. Five candidate peptides were screened by direct ex vivo stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from CMV-seropositive HLA-A*2402 individuals, and quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to evaluate CTL responses by measuring interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) transcripts. One of the five candidate peptides, pp65341-350 (QYDPVAALFF), induced significant quantities of IFN-gamma mRNA production after 3 hours. PBMCs from CMV-seropositive HLA-A*2402 individuals sensitized in vitro with pp65341-350 also recognized CMV-infected targets. In conclusion, the measurement of IFN-gamma mRNA by qRT-PCR can be used to detect CTL responses 3 hours after peptide stimulation of a small quantity of PBMCs. This method has an advantage over other methods used to identify immune dominant epitopes in that it does not require in vitro expansion of CTLs with cytokines or virally infected targets. As a result, this method measures naturally induced immune reactions.

Pattern and persistence of the epitope-specific IgM response against human cytomegalovirus in renal transplant patients

The humoral immune response against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) was evaluated in immunocompromised patients by Western blotting (WB) based on recombinant viral envelope (gB and gH) and tegument (pp150 and pp65) proteins. Three groups of patients were investigated: (a) 74 renal transplant recipients; (b) 24 hemodialysis patients, both groups without clinical evidence of viral infections; and (c) 19 renal transplant patients with manifest HCMV infections. The results obtained suggest that (i) the WB is considerably more sensitive, recognizing the HCMV-specific IgM response rather than the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. An IgM response was detected in one-third of all clinically asymptomatic renal patients. (ii) The virus-specific IgM response is primarily directed against the pp150 epitope. (iii) In patients with clinically manifest HCMV disease, additional IgM reactivities are most frequently directed against the glycoprotein B epitope. (iv) The severity of HCMV infections correlates with the extent of the IgM antibody response, i.e. with the number of specific epitopes involved. (v) After transplantation, IgM reactivity and its epitope-specific pattern persist for years.