Randomized, double-blind study in healthy adults to assess the boosting effect of Vaqta or Havrix after a single dose of Havrix

Durability of serologic responses to inactivated hepatitis A virus vaccination among people living with HIV following acute hepatitis A outbreak: a 5-year follow-up study

Serologic responses to hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccination may wane among immunocompromised populations. To evaluate the long-term seroresponses to 2-dose HAV vaccination, we retrospectively included people living with HIV (PLWH) who had achieved seroconversion within 12 months after vaccination at a university hospital during an outbreak of acute hepatitis A between 2015 and 2017. PLWH included in the study received either Havrix or Vaqta. The seroresponses were evaluated 60 months after the second dose of vaccination and estimated by the intention-to-treat (ITT) with last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Overall, 986 PLWH (median age, 34 years and CD4 count, 587 cells/µL) were included. The rates of PLWH with persistent seroprotection at month 60 of vaccination were 90.7% (894/986) and 97.4% (748/768) in the ITT with LOCF and PP analyses, respectively. PLWH with persistent seroprotection had achieved higher peak anti-HAV IgG titers after vaccination and had a slower decline in antibody levels compared with those with seroreversion. In the multivariable analysis, seroreversion at month 60 was associated with body-mass index (per 1-kg/m² increase, AOR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.04-1.17), lowest-ever CD4 count (per 10-cell/µL increase, AOR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), plasma HIV RNA <200 copies/ml at vaccination (AOR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.14-0.59), and having received Vaqta as the first dose of HAV vaccination (AOR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.27-0.70). The seroprotection against HAV remained high in the long-term follow-up among PLWH on antiretroviral therapy after 2-dose HAV vaccination. Regular monitoring of seroresponses and timely administration of HAV vaccines are warranted to maintain seroprotection.

Prevention of Hepatitis A Virus Infection in the United States: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, 2020

HEPATITIS A IS A VACCINE-PREVENTABLE, COMMUNICABLE DISEASE OF THE LIVER CAUSED BY THE HEPATITIS A VIRUS (HAV). THE INFECTION IS TRANSMITTED VIA THE FECAL-ORAL ROUTE, USUALLY FROM DIRECT PERSON-TO-PERSON CONTACT OR CONSUMPTION OF CONTAMINATED FOOD OR WATER. HEPATITIS A IS AN ACUTE, SELF-LIMITED DISEASE THAT DOES NOT RESULT IN CHRONIC INFECTION. HAV ANTIBODIES (IMMUNOGLOBULIN G [IGG] ANTI-HAV) PRODUCED IN RESPONSE TO HAV INFECTION PERSIST FOR LIFE AND PROTECT AGAINST REINFECTION; IGG ANTI-HAV PRODUCED AFTER VACCINATION CONFER LONG-TERM IMMUNITY. THIS REPORT SUPPLANTS AND SUMMARIZES PREVIOUSLY PUBLISHED RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON IMMUNIZATION PRACTICES (ACIP) REGARDING THE PREVENTION OF HAV INFECTION IN THE UNITED STATES. ACIP RECOMMENDS ROUTINE VACCINATION OF CHILDREN AGED 12-23 MONTHS AND CATCH-UP VACCINATION FOR CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS AGED 2-18 YEARS WHO HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY RECEIVED HEPATITIS A (HEPA) VACCINE AT ANY AGE. ACIP RECOMMENDS HEPA VACCINATION FOR ADULTS AT RISK FOR HAV INFECTION OR SEVERE DISEASE FROM HAV INFECTION AND FOR ADULTS REQUESTING PROTECTION AGAINST HAV WITHOUT ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF A RISK FACTOR. THESE RECOMMENDATIONS ALSO PROVIDE GUIDANCE FOR VACCINATION BEFORE TRAVEL, FOR POSTEXPOSURE PROPHYLAXIS, IN SETTINGS PROVIDING SERVICES TO ADULTS, AND DURING OUTBREAKS.

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

This review is withdrawn because it is outdated. A new review is to be published by the end of 2019.

Comparable Serologic Responses to 2 Different Combinations of Inactivated Hepatitis A Virus Vaccines in HIV-Positive Patients During an Acute Hepatitis A Outbreak in Taiwan

We evaluated the serologic responses to different 2-dose combinations of the inactivated hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines Havrix and Vaqta among human immunodeficiency virus-positive individuals during an acute hepatitis A outbreak in Taiwan. In this 16-month retrospective study, one group received 1 dose of Havrix followed by 1 dose of Vaqta, and another group received 2 doses of Vaqta. The Havrix-Vaqta and Vaqta-Vaqta groups achieved similar seroconversion rates at weeks 28-36 (82.3% and 80.9%, respectively; absolute difference, 1.3% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -6.3%-3.7%]) and week 48 (94.7% and 94.4%, respectively; absolute difference, 0.3% [95% CI, -2.6%-3.2%]), suggesting the interchangeability of different combinations of HAV vaccines. The significantly higher seroconversion rate after the first dose of Vaqta, compared with the dose of Havrix (53.0% vs 32.4%) may provide potential benefits in preventing HAV infection during the outbreak.

INTERCHANGEABILITY OF VIRAL VACCINES FOR IMMUNIZATION

The review presents the results of the analysis of domestic and foreign scientific literature on the interchangeability of hepatitis A, B and influenza vaccines. The WHO materials, regulatory documents, data from scientific literature of foreign countries and Russia about the vaccine interchangeability are summarized. The problem of objective assessment of interchangeability of drugs is relevant worldwide. The definition of an "interchangeable drug" does not draw a clear line between the interoperability criteria for chemical and immunobiological drugs. The official guidance documents on immunization adopted in several countries define "interchangeability" as the practice of transition from a vaccine available from a certain manufacturer to a similar vaccine available from another manufacturer. The term "interchangeable" can be applied to immunobiological drugs if one of the drugs can be replaced with the other in the course of vaccination. The concept of interchangeability applies to vaccines that do not differ in efficacy (immunological, preventive, epidemiological) and safety and are used in an immunization course involving multiple administration of these vaccines. The definition of interchangeability is important in order to address the problem of replacing unidirectional vaccines available from different manufacturers when purchasing vaccines included in the national schedule of preventive vaccinations and in the schedule of preventive vaccination on epidemic indications. One of the most important conditions for "interchangeability" of vaccines is their application in accordance with the recommended schedule of administration and the dosage indicated by the manufacturer. Research data show that vaccines can be interchangeable if used in accordance with the recommended schedule of administration and the dosage specified by the manufacturer. Control agencies of many countries issue recommendations regulating the procedure of vaccine replacement in case of necessity. However, there are no special regulations of vaccine interchangeability in Russia. The concept of vaccine "interchangeability" should be extended to the continuation of a course of vaccinations in a particular person with a vaccine of another manufacturer and the possibility of applying similar vaccines available from different manufacturers.

Immunogenicity of aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine (Havrix®) administered as a third dose after primary doses of Japanese aluminum-free hepatitis A vaccine (Aimmugen®) for Japanese travelers to endemic countries

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis A vaccination is recommended for travelers to endemic countries. Several inactivated aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccines are available worldwide, but only one licensed hepatitis A vaccine is available in Japan. This vaccine is a lyophilized inactivated aluminum-free hepatitis A vaccine (Aimmugen®). The standard schedule of Aimmugen® is three doses (at 0, 2-4 weeks, and 6 months). Japanese people will go abroad after receiving 2 doses of Aimmugen®. Some long-term travelers will receive the third dose of hepatitis A vaccine at their destination, at 6-24 months after 2 doses of Aimmugen®. Aimmugen® is not available in countries other than Japan. They receive inactivated aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine instead of a third dose of Aimmugen®. This study was undertaken to determine whether the booster vaccination with an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine is effective following two doses of Aimmugen®.

METHODS

Subjects were healthy Japanese adults aged 20 years or older who had received two doses of Aimmugen®. Subjects received a booster dose of Havrix®1440 intramuscularly as the third dose. Serology samples for hepatitis A virus antibody titers were taken 4-6 weeks later. Anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titers were measured by an inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

Subjects were 20 healthy Japanese adults, 6 men and 14 women. The mean age ± standard deviation was 37.2 ± 13.3. The seroprotection rate (SPR, anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titer ≥10 mIU/mL) was 85% at enrollment, and increased to 100% after vaccination with Havrix®. The geometric mean anti-hepatitis A virus antibody titer increased from 39.8 mIU/mL to 2938.2 mIU/mL.

CONCLUSION

The three scheduled doses consisting of two doses of Aimmugen® plus a third dose with Havrix® is more immunogenic than using only two doses of Aimmugen®. The vaccination with Havrix® could be allowed to be used instead of a third dose of Aimmugen®. (UMIN000009351).

Hepatitis A immunisation in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A

BACKGROUND

In many parts of the world, hepatitis A infection represents a significant cause of morbidity and socio-economic loss. Whilst hepatitis A vaccines have the potential to prevent disease, the degree of protection afforded against clinical outcomes and within different populations remains uncertain. There are two types of hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccine, inactivated and live attenuated. It is important to determine the efficacy and safety for both vaccine types.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the clinical protective efficacy, sero-protective efficacy, and safety and harms of hepatitis A vaccination in persons not previously exposed to hepatitis A.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Science Citation Index Expanded, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) up to November 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing HAV vaccine with placebo, no intervention, or appropriate control vaccines in participants of all ages.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were undertaken by two authors and verified by a third author. Where required, authors contacted investigators to obtain missing data. The primary outcome was the occurrence of clinically apparent hepatitis A (infectious hepatitis). The secondary outcomes were lack of sero-protective anti-HAV immunoglobulin G (IgG), and number and types of adverse events. Results were presented as relative risks (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Dichotomous outcomes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI), using intention-to-treat analysis. We conducted assessment of risk of bias to evaluate the risk of systematic errors (bias) and trial sequential analyses to estimate the risk of random errors (the play of chance).

MAIN RESULTS

We included a total of 11 clinical studies, of which only three were considered to have low risk of bias; two were quasi-randomised studies in which we only addressed harms. Nine randomised trials with 732,380 participants addressed the primary outcome of clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Of these, four trials assessed the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine (41,690 participants) and five trials assessed the live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (690,690 participants). In the three randomised trials with low risk of bias (all assessing inactivated vaccine), clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 9/20,684 (0.04%) versus 92/20,746 (0.44%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30). In all nine randomised trials, clinically apparent hepatitis A occurred in 31/375,726 (0.01%) versus 505/356,654 (0.18%) participants in the HAV vaccine and control groups respectively (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.17). These results were supported by trial sequential analyses. Subgroup analyses confirmed the clinical effectiveness of both inactivated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.09, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.30) and live attenuated hepatitis A vaccines (RR 0.07, 95% CI 0.03 to 0.17) on clinically confirmed hepatitis A. Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines had a significant effect on reducing the lack of sero-protection (less than 20 mIU/L) (RR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.03). No trial reported on a sero-protective threshold less than 10 mIU/L. The risk of both non-serious local and systemic adverse events was comparable to placebo for the inactivated HAV vaccines. There were insufficient data to draw conclusions on adverse events for the live attenuated HAV vaccine.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Hepatitis A vaccines are effective for pre-exposure prophylaxis of hepatitis A in susceptible individuals. This review demonstrated significant protection for at least two years with the inactivated HAV vaccine and at least five years with the live attenuated HAV vaccine. There was evidence to support the safety of the inactivated hepatitis A vaccine. More high quality evidence is required to determine the safety of live attenuated vaccines.

Hepatitis A vaccine recommendations

Since licensure in 1995 of a hepatitis A vaccine, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Academy of Pediatrics have been implementing an incremental hepatitis A immunization strategy for children. In 1996, children living in populations with the highest rates of disease were targeted for immunization, and in 1999 the program was expanded to immunization of children 2 years and older living in states and counties with rates of hepatitis A that historically have been higher than the national average. The 1999 program has been successful; the current rate of hepatitis A is the lowest ever reported in the United States. Regional, ethnic, and racial differences in the incidence of hepatitis A have been eliminated. The incidence of hepatitis A in adults in immunizing states has decreased significantly, suggesting a strong herd-immunity effect associated with immunization. In 2005, the US Food and Drug Administration changed the youngest approved age of administration of hepatitis A vaccine from 24 to 12 months of age, which facilitated incorporation of the vaccine into the recommended childhood immunization schedule. As the next step in the implementation of the incremental vaccine immunization strategy, the American Academy of Pediatrics now recommends routine administration of a Food and Drug Administration-licensed hepatitis A vaccine to all children 12 to 23 months of age in all states according to a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-approved immunization schedule. Available data suggest that hepatitis A vaccine can be coadministered with other childhood vaccines without decreasing immunogenicity. Hepatitis A vaccines have proven to be extremely safe. In prelicensure clinical trials of both Havrix (GlaxoSmithKline, Rixensart, Belgium) and Vaqta (Merck & Co Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ), adverse events were uncommon and mild when they occurred, with resolution typically in less than 1 day. Hepatitis A vaccine is contraindicated in people with a history of severe allergic reaction to a previous dose of hepatitis A vaccine or to a vaccine component. Because the hepatitis A vaccine is an inactivated product, no special precautions are needed for administration to people who are immunocompromised. No data exist about administration of the hepatitis A vaccine to pregnant women, but because it is not a live vaccine, the risk to mother and fetus should be extremely low to nonexistent.

Long-term immunity in young adults after a single dose of inactivated Hepatitis A vaccines

We evaluated in a prospective study the immune response of naïve subjects to a single dose of inactivated Hepatitis A vaccine. Ninety-seven percent of the vaccinees sero-converted 1 month after vaccination and 93% were still positive 2 years later. All of the vaccinees had a strong booster response 2 years after the single dose. Avaxim was more immunogenic than Vaqta for the primary dose (p = 0.01 for sero-positivity, p<0.001 for antibody level) but no differences were found after boosting with Avaxim. Performance of intense physical activity during the first month after a single vaccine dose was associated with lower antibody levels (p = 0.004). This study indicates that a single dose of inactivated HAV vaccine elicits protective immune memory for at least 2 years.

Hepatitis A: a preventable threat

Hepatitis A is a major public health problem, particularly in the pediatric population. Although hepatitis A infection does not cause chronic liver disease, it is associated with significant morbidity. The virus is transmitted primarily by person-to-person contact via the fecal-oral route. The infection can be inapparent, subclinical, anicteric, or icteric. In general, the severity of the disease is inversely correlated with the age of the child. Occasionally, fulminant hepatitis, which is associated with a high mortality rate, may result. The diagnosis of acute hepatitis A is most commonly made through the detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-hepatitis A antibody. Treatment is generally supportive. General preventive measures include improved standards of hygiene and sanitation. Universal childhood vaccination is the most effective method for eradicating hepatitis A and preventing its transmission.

Interchangeability and tolerability of a virosomal and an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine

The interchangeability of virosomal (Epaxal) and aluminum-adsorbed (Havrix 1440) hepatitis A virus (HAV) vaccines was studied in 111 healthy adults who were vaccinated in a randomized, single-blind, crossover clinical trial. Anti-HAV antibody titers were measured at days 0 (first dose), 14, and 28, and months 3, 6, 12 (second dose), 13, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72. Most subjects (>95%) had sero-converted 14 days after the first dose of either vaccine. The second dose with either vaccine induced a high antibody response in all vaccines, irrespective of the type of vaccine administered as the first dose. Although both vaccines were well tolerated, the incidence of local adverse events (in particular pain) was significantly lower in subjects receiving the virosomal vaccine. Six-year follow-up data did not reveal any significant differences between the vaccination groups.

Immunogenicity of booster vaccination with a virosomal hepatitis A vaccine after primary immunization with an aluminum-adsorbed hepatitis A vaccine

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of individuals are traveling to areas of high hepatitis A endemicity and require immunization against the hepatitis A virus (HAV). The option of using a virosomal, aluminum-free, HAV vaccine (Epaxal) for booster immunization following primary vaccination with an aluminum-adsorbed vaccine has been assessed.

METHODS

In total, 142 healthy subjects, 79 men and 63 women, aged 12 to 72 years, were injected intramuscularly with a booster dose of Epaxal (0.5 mL containing < or =500 RIA units of HAV antigen) 6 to 24 months after primary vaccination with Havrix (0.5 or 1.0 mL containing 720 or 1440 ELISA units of HAV antigen, respectively, adsorbed onto aluminum hydroxide). Anti-HAV antibody titers were measured on days 0 and 28 by an enzyme immunoassay. Adverse events were recorded for 1 month postinjection.

RESULTS

Overall, 98/118 subjects (83%) with no serologic evidence of past HAV infection were still seroprotected at enrolment (anti-HAV antibody titer < or = 20 mIU/mL). The seroprotection rate was 87% in those primed with Havrix 1440 6 to 12 months earlier (n=93) and 60% in those primed < or =12 months before enrolment (n=20, mean 16 months). The geometric mean anti-HAV antibody titer increased from 65 mIU/mL at day 0 to 1,722 mIU/mL at day 28 after a single booster dose with Epaxal in evaluable subjects who were primarily vaccinated with either a single dose of Havrix 1440 (n=111) or two separate doses of Havrix 720 (n=4). All subjects were seroprotected at day 28, and 98% showed at least a four-fold increase in anti-HAV antibody titer. Epaxal was well tolerated and no serious adverse events were reported. At day 28, the tolerability of the vaccination was judged as either "very good" or "good" by 96% of vaccinees and by all investigators.

CONCLUSION

Epaxal can be successfully used to boost immunization following primary vaccination with an aluminum-adsorbed vaccine, and is well tolerated.

Prevention of hepatitis A by vaccination

Inactivated hepatitis A vaccines have been available for more than a decade. Characteristics of the vaccines, comparative data among different formulations and the possibility of combination and association with other vaccines are reviewed in this article. Hepatitis A vaccines show high immunogenicity with different schedules and associations, induce long-term protection irrespective of timing of booster dose, and present an excellent safety profile. Pre-exposure efficacy has been demonstrated in large trials and postexposure protection has been described in family contacts of acute cases. The recommendations for the use of hepatitis A vaccines for immunisation campaigns and for targeted groups, such as travellers and people at risk for occupational and iatrogenic exposure or lifestyle behaviours, are discussed. Aspects related to economic analysis of vaccination strategies are also considered.

Long-term immunogenicity and protective efficacy of a live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (LA-1 strain)

AIM

To evaluate the long-term protective efficacy following a large scale immunization with a live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine (the LA-1 strain) and immune persistence of the vaccine with different immunization schedules.

METHODS

A randomized controlled double-blind study was conducted in 212 985 children between 1.5 and 10 years of age from 8 counties in Guangxi province (10 0735 in vaccine group and 112 250 in control group). Vaccine group was received one dose of HAV vaccine of 10^6.75 TCID₅₀ (LA-1 strain, China). Surveillance of the incidence of hepatitis A in the two groups was started 1 month after vaccination. To evaluate the persistence of antibodies, 156 children of 6-9 years old with hepatitis A antibody negative were divided into 3 groups with equalities in age and sex. Group A was given one dose of the vaccine, Group B and C were immunized according to 0, 6 and 0, 12 schedules respectively. During follow-up of every individual, the blood specimens were collected at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after immunization in Group A and 12, 24 and 36 months after first dose and 1 month after second dose in Group B and C. Anti-HAV levels were expressed as GMTs in mIU/ml by serial immunoglobulin dilutions (WHO standard) and HAVAB-Imx kit (Abbott Lab, USA).

RESULTS

During a follow-up for 36 months, 71 cases of symptomatic HAV infection were found in the control and 2 in the vaccine group (63.25/10⁶vs 1.99/10⁶ respectively). The protective efficacy was estimated at 96.85% with 95% lower confidence limit of 92.4%. The antibody positive rate in Group A after 6-24 months was 88.6-91.4%, the GMT was 105-106 mIU/ml, but each of those decreased to 80.0% and 99.20 mIU/ml after 36 months. GMT reached to the top in Group B and C1 month after the second dose, 1024.63 mIU/ml and 3 463.21 mIU/ml respectively. But during the time from top GMT to 24th month, the GMT of Group B and C decreased rapidly to about 59.4% and 83% respectively, and it continually declined slowly at 36^th month to 459.68 mIU/ml and 506.23 mIU/ml, which were 6% and 15% lower than that at 24^th month. It showed that the antibody level in Group B and C after 2 doses were significantly higher than that in Group A from beginning to end, at 36th month the GMT of Group B and C were 4.6 times and 5.1 times to that of Group A, and the antibody positive rate (97%) was higher than that of Group A (80%) at the same time.

CONCLUSION

A single dose of live attenuated hepatitis A vaccine can come into being high and persistent protection against hepatitis A. Booster dose induces an immune response which persists for at least three years in 97% of the subjects. The high GMT still present at month 36 predicts a long-term persistence of antibody.

Hepatitis A vaccine

Hepatitis A is an infectious disease frequently reported in the United States. An average of 26,000 cases were reported each year during 1980 to 1999; probably 3 times as many occurred. Hepatitis A vaccines provide a powerful new prevention tool. The 2 inactivated hepatitis A vaccines available as pediatric and adult formulations in the United States and in many other countries are safe, immunogenic, and efficacious. A single dose provides excellent short-term protection; the second dose is thought to be important for long-term protection. Because hepatitis A virus (HAV) is excreted in high concentrations in the stool, the principal mode of transmission is person-to-person by the fecal-oral route, most commonly among household and sexual contacts of people with HAV infection. Children can be important in transmission because they frequently have unrecognized or asymptomatic infection. Implementation of recommendations for routine hepatitis A vaccination of children living in areas with consistently elevated hepatitis A rates appears to be resulting in dramatic declines in the overall incidence of the disease. Improved vaccination coverage and continued monitoring of incidence rates are needed to determine the overall long-term impact of this strategy.