Do guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia improve the cost-effectiveness of hospital care?

Limitations in the use of automated mental status detection for clinical decision support

BACKGROUND

Clinical decision support (CDS) tools improve adherence to evidence-based practices but are dependent upon data quality in the electronic health record (EHR). Mental status is an integral component of many risk stratification scores, but it is not known whether EHR-measures of altered mental status are reliable. The Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) is a measure of altered mentation that is widely adopted and entered in the EHR in structured format. We sought to determine the accuracy GCS < 15 as an EHR-measure of altered mentation compared to ED provider documentation.

METHODS

In patients presenting to an academic Emergency Department (ED) with pneumonia we abstracted GCS values entered by nurses during routine care and in a randomly selected subset manually reviewed provider documentation for evidence of altered mental status. We defined eConfusion as present if GCS < 15 at any point during the ED encounter. We then calculated the CURB-65 score and corresponding suggested disposition using each method. Performance of eConfusion and corresponding CURB-65 compared to manual versions was measured using agreement (Cohen's K), sensitivity, and specificity.

RESULTS

Among 300 randomly selected encounters, 47 (16 %) had eConfusion present and 46 (15 %) had evidence of altered mental status in provider documentation with Cohen's K 0.73. eConfusion had 78 % sensitivity and 96 % specificity for provider documented altered mental status. When input into CURB-65 to recommend inpatient disposition, eConfusion had 95 % sensitivity, and recommended discordant disposition for 3 %.

CONCLUSIONS

There was modest agreement between eConfusion and provider documentation of altered mental status. eConfusion had good specificity but low sensitivity which resulted in under-estimation of the CURB-65 score and occasional inappropriate disposition recommendations compared to provider documentation. These data do not support the use of GCS as a measure for altered mentation for use in CDS tools in the ED.

Barriers to Clinical Practice Guideline Implementation Among Physicians: A Physician Survey

Introduction

Clinical practice guidelines can help physicians provide evidence-based, standardized clinical decisions. We aimed to assess physician attitudes toward and barriers to guideline adherence.

Methods

We conducted a single center, cross-sectional, survey-based study. Physicians from many specialties participated in the study. All outcomes were measured using a validated survey tool. The primary outcome of interest was barriers to guideline adherence. Secondary outcomes included general attitudes toward guidelines and factors that could improve adherence to guidelines. Outcomes were measured by the survey tool. All outcomes were reported on a 5-point Likert scale.

Results

The email survey was received by 1819 physicians with 400 responders (22% response rate). About 50% (n=200) were in practice for >5 years, while 27% (n=107) were still in training. Trainees were less likely to understand the process of guideline development (RR= 0.76 [0.65–0.88], p=0.0017), to have input in guideline development (RR= 0.52 [0.41–0.65], p<0.0001), and to report up-to-date knowledge in practice guidelines (RR=0.53 [0.30–0.73], p=0.0002). Three factors were identified as major barriers to guideline adherence: complexity of guideline documents (61%, n=240), high number of weak or conditional recommendations (62%, n=245), and time constraints due to clinical responsibilities (65%, n=255). Factors that would improve guideline adherence included access to relevant guidelines at the point of care (87%), improved focus on guidelines during training (82%), and transparency on physician commercial affiliation (62%).

Conclusion

Improved focus on guidelines during training and access to relevant guidelines at the point of care may be important to improve adherence to guidelines.

Socio-Ecological Systems Analysis and Health System Readiness in Responding to Dengue Epidemics in Ilala and Kinondoni Districts, Tanzania

Introduction

Since 2010, Tanzania has been experiencing frequent outbreaks of dengue. The objectives of this study were to carry out a socio-ecological systems (SES) analysis to identify risk factors and interventions and assess the readiness of the district in the prevention and control of dengue.

Methods

The study utilized a cross-sectional purposive selection of key stakeholders responsible for disease surveillance and response in human and animal sectors in Ilala and Kinondoni districts in Tanzania. A SES framework was used to identify drivers and construct perceived thematic causal explanations of the dengue outbreaks in the study districts. A mapping exercise was carried out to analyse the performance of the disease surveillance system at district and facility levels. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to assess the districts’ readiness in the response to dengue outbreak.

Results

The two districts were characterized by both urban and peri-urban ecosystems, with a mixture of planned and unplanned settlements which support breeding and proliferation of Aedes mosquitoes. The results indicate inadequate levels of readiness in the management and control of dengue outbreaks, in terms of clinical competence, diagnostic capacities, surveillance system and control/prevention measures. Mosquito breeding sites, especially discarded automobile tyres, were reported to be scattered in the districts. Constraining factors in implementing disease surveillance included both intrapersonal and interpersonal factors, lack of case management guidelines, difficult language used in standard case definitions, inadequate laboratory capacity, lack of appropriate rapid response teams, inadequate knowledge on outbreak investigation and inadequate capacities in data management.

Conclusion

The two districts had limited readiness in the management and control of dengue, in terms of clinical competence, diagnostic capacities, surveillance system and prevention and control measures. These challenges require the immediate attention by the authorities, as they compromise the effectiveness of the national strategy for community health support.

Improved treatment of community-acquired pneumonia through tailored interventions: Results from a controlled, multicentre quality improvement project

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is one of the leading causes of healthcare utilisation and death worldwide. Treatment according to evidence-based clinical guidelines can reduce mortality, antibiotic exposure and length of hospital stay related to CAP.

Local problem

Several studies, including a pilot study from one of our sites, indicate that physicians show a low grade of guideline adherence when managing patients with CAP.

Methods

To improve the guideline-based treatment of patients with CAP admitted to hospital, we designed a quality improvement study. Four process indicators were combined in a CAP care bundle: chest X-ray, CURB-65 severity score, lower respiratory tract samples and antibiotics within 8 hours from admission. After a 4-month baseline period, we applied multiple interventions at three hospitals during 8 months. Progression in our process indicators was measured continuously and compared with a control site without interventions. After the 8-month intervention period, we continued with a 4-month follow-up period to assess the sustainability of the improvements.

Results

The care bundle utilisation rate within 8 hours increased from 11% at baseline to 41% in the follow-up period at the intervention sites, whereas it remained below 3% at the control site. The most considerable improvements have been observed regarding documentation of CURB-65 (34% at baseline, 68% at follow-up) and the collection of lower respiratory tract samples (43% at baseline, 63% at follow-up).

Conclusion

Our study has demonstrated poor adherence to CAP guidelines at all sites at baseline. After implementing multiple tailored interventions, guideline adherence increased substantially. In conclusion, we recommend that CAP guidelines should be actively adapted in order to be followed in a daily routine.

Effects of age, comorbidity and adherence to current antimicrobial guidelines on mortality in hospitalized elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Limited information exists on the clinical characteristics predictive of mortality in patients aged ≥65 years in many countries. The impact of adherence to current antimicrobial guidelines on the mortality of hospitalized elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has never been assessed.

METHODS

A total of 3131 patients aged ≥65 years were enrolled from a multi-center, retrospective, observational study initiated by the CAP-China network. Risk factors for death were screened with multivariable logistic regression analysis, with emphasis on the evaluation of age, comorbidities and antimicrobial treatment regimen with regard to the current Chinese CAP guidelines.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study population was 77.4 ± 7.4 years. Overall in-hospital and 60-day mortality were 5.7% and 7.6%, respectively; these rates were three-fold higher in those aged ≥85 years than in the 65-74 group (11.9% versus 3.2% for in-hospital mortality and 14.1% versus 4.7% for 60-day mortality, respectively). The mortality was significantly higher among patients with comorbidities compared with those who were otherwise healthy. According to the 2016 Chinese CAP guidelines, 62.1% of patients (1907/3073) received non-adherent treatment. For general-ward patients without risk factors for Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infection (n = 2258), 52.3% (1094/2090) were over-treated, characterized by monotherapy with an anti-pseudomonal β-lactam or combination with fluoroquinolone + β-lactam; while 71.4% of intensive care unit (ICU) patients (120/168) were undertreated, without coverage of atypical bacteria. Among patients with risk factors for PA infection (n = 815), 22.9% (165/722) of those in the general ward and 74.2% of those in the ICU (69/93) were undertreated, using regimens without anti-pseudomonal activity. The independent predictors of 60-day mortality were age, long-term bedridden status, congestive heart failure, CURB-65, glucose, heart rate, arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) and albumin levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Overtreatment in general-ward patients and undertreatment in ICU patients were critical problems. Compliance with Chinese guidelines will require fundamental changes in standard-of-care treatment patterns. The data included herein may facilitate early identification of patients at increased risk of mortality.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02489578 ).

Appropriate antibiotic use reduces length of hospital stay

Objectives

To define appropriate antibiotic use in hospitalized adults treated for a bacterial infection, we previously developed and validated a set of six generic quality indicators (QIs) covering all steps in the process of antibiotic use. We assessed the association between appropriate antibiotic use, defined by these QIs, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

Methods

An observational multicentre study in 22 hospitals in the Netherlands included 1890 adult, non-ICU patients using antibiotics for a suspected bacterial infection. Performance scores were calculated for all QIs separately (appropriate or not), and a sum score described performance on the total set of QIs. We divided the sum scores into two groups: low (0%-49%) versus high (50%-100%). Multilevel analyses, correcting for confounders, were used to correlate QI performance (single and combined) with (log-transformed) LOS and in-hospital mortality.

Results

The only single QI associated with shorter LOS was appropriate intravenous-oral switch (geometric means 6.5 versus 11.2 days; P  < 0.001). A high sum score was associated with a shorter LOS in the total group (10.1 versus 11.2 days; P  = 0.002) and in the subgroup of community-acquired infections (9.7 versus 10.9 days; P  =   0.007), but not in the subgroup of hospital-acquired infections. We found no association between performance on QIs and in-hospital mortality or readmission rate.

Conclusions

Appropriate antibiotic use, defined by validated process QIs, in hospitalized adult patients with a suspected bacterial infection appears to be associated with a shorter LOS and therefore positively contributes to patient outcome and healthcare costs.

CAPECO: Cost evaluation of community acquired pneumonia managed in primary care

BACKGROUND

Estimating the economic burden of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) managed in ambulatory setting is needed in France since no data are available.

METHOD

A retrospective study (CAPECO) was conducted based on a prospective French study describing patients with suspected CAP managed in primary care (CAPA). The aim of the CAPECO study was to estimate and explain medical costs of a disease episode in CAP patients only followed in ambulatory care and in hospitalised patients. Primary endpoints were the direct medical costs, impact on productivity and costs of incident CAP over one year. Secondary endpoint was to describe predictive factors of costs, hospital admission and stay length.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 886 patients, resulting in an incidence of CAP of 400 per 100,000 inhabitants per year, the mean direct medical cost of a disease episode of CAP was € 118.8 for strictly ambulatory patients with an equal weight for medical time, drugs, diagnostic procedures and tests. This direct cost was € 102.1 before admission for patients who were finally hospitalised. The mean cost of hospital admissions was € 3522.9. Main predictive factors of hospital admission and stay length were respectively a history of chronic respiratory disease and older age. Factors of direct medical cost were prescribing X-ray examination and having a positive X-ray. The impact of a disease episode on productivity was € 1980 (sd 1400) per ambulatory episode and € 5425 (sd 4760) per episode leading to hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Costs per ambulatory episode were modest but increased substantially in hospitalised patients, who were more numerous when chronic respiratory disorders were present and in the elderly. Indirect costs were significant. Deciders should thus consider both direct and indirect costs when assessing preventive interventions in the context of this disease.

Do guidelines influence the implementation of health programs?--Uganda's experience

Background

A guideline contains processes and procedures intended to guide health service delivery. However, the presence of guidelines may not guarantee their implementation, which may be a result of weaknesses in the development process. This study was undertaken to describe the processes of developing health planning, services management, and clinical guidelines within the health sector in Uganda, with the goal of understanding how these processes facilitate or abate the utility of guidelines.

Methods

Qualitative and quantitative research methods were used to collect and analyze data. Data collection was undertaken at the levels of the central Ministry of Health, the district, and service delivery. Qualitative methods included review of documents, observations, and key informant interviews, as well as quantitative aspects included counting guidelines. Quantitative data were analyzed with Microsoft Excel, and qualitative data were analyzed using deductive content thematic analysis.

Results

There were 137 guidelines in the health sector, with programs related to Millennium Development Goals having the highest number (n = 83). The impetus for guideline development was stated in 78% of cases. Several guidelines duplicated content, and some conflicted with each other. The level of consultation varied, and some guidelines did not consider government-wide policies and circumstances at the service delivery level. Booklets were the main format of presentation, which was not tailored to the service delivery level. There was no framework for systematic dissemination, and target users were defined broadly in most cases. Over 60% of guidelines available at the central level were not available at the service delivery level, but there were good examples in isolated cases. There was no framework for systematic monitoring of use, evaluation, and review of guidelines. Suboptimal performance of the supervision framework that would encourage the use of guidelines, assess their utilization, and provide feedback was noted.

Conclusions

Guideline effectiveness is compromised by the development process. To ensure the production of high-quality guidelines, efforts must be employed at the country and regional levels. The regional level can facilitate pooling resources and expertise in knowledge generation, methodology development, guideline repositories, and capacity building. Countries should establish and enforce systems and guidance on guideline development.

[The routine use of the Pneumonia Severity Index in the emergency department: effect on process-of-care indicators and results in community acquired pneumonia]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate process-of-care indicators (inappropriate hospitalisation, suitability and early antibiotic treatment) and outcome indicators (length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, ICU admission, and mortality) in the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) when the SEPAR/IDSA guidelines were applied.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational retrospective study conducted on patients diagnosed with CAP during the first semester of 2007 and 2008 (186 and 161 patients, respectively) in the emergency unit of a general hospital. Differences in the process-of-care and outcome indicators between 2007 and 2008 (with and without the Pneumonia Severity Index [PSI]) were evaluated. Moreover, the indicators were compared with those obtained in 2006 (110 patients), when the current guidelines were those of SEQ/ATS.

RESULTS

The SEPAR/IDSA guidelines improved the following process-of-care indicators: appropriateness of treatment, unjustified hospital readmission (39.4% in 2006 vs. 8.5% in 2007 [P<.001], and 17,2% in 2008 [P=.005]), and early treatment. However, outcome indicators did not change. In 2008, a decrease in the mortality of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was observed in comparison with the patients in which the PSI was not estimated (2.3% vs. 28.3%; P<.001). Moreover, the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated was lower than those measured using the SEQ/ATS guidelines (22.7%; P=.003).

CONCLUSION

SEPAR/IDSA guidelines decreased the unjustified hospital readmission. In the second year of its application an increase in the number of patients who received early treatment, and a decrease of the mortality rate of the patients of risk classes IV-V in which the PSI had been estimated, were also observed.

National study of antibiotic use in emergency department visits for pneumonia, 1993 through 2008

OBJECTIVES

The Infectious Disease Society of America (IDSA) and American Thoracic Society (ATS) developed guidelines for the management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP); however, there are sparse data on actual rates of antibiotic use in the emergency department (ED) setting.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) for ED visits during 1993 through 2008 for adults with a diagnosis of pneumonia.

RESULTS

During the study period there were an estimated 23,252,000 pneumonia visits, representing 1.8% of all ED visits. The visit rate for pneumonia during this 16-year period may have increased (p trend = 0.055). Overall, 66% of adult patients with a primary diagnosis of pneumonia had documentation of an antibiotic administered while in the ED. There was an increase in antibiotic administration for adults with pneumonia from 1993 through 2008 (49% to 80%; p trend < 0.001). Specifically, there was an increase in use of macrolides from 1993 to 2006 (20% to 30%, p trend < 0.001) and a marked increase in use of quinolones from 0% to 39% from 1993 through 2008 (p trend < 0.001). Penicillin and cephalosporin use remained stable. Use of an antibiotic consistent with 2007 IDSA/ATS guidelines increased from 22% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 16% to 27%) of cases in 1993-1994 to 68% (95% CI = 63% to 73%) of cases in 2007-2008 (p trend < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

ED visit rates for pneumonia increased slightly from 1993 through 2008. Although antibiotic administration in the ED has increased for adults with CAP, guideline-concordant antibiotics may not be consistently administered.

An audit of inpatient management of community-acquired pneumonia in Oman: a comparison with regional clinical guidelines

OBJECTIVE

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Herein, we present the findings from an audit of CAP management at a tertiary hospital in Oman. The main objective was to evaluate the quality of care given to patients and compare it with the standards in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) CAP guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective case study of all patients admitted with CAP from June 2006 to September 2008 examined the adherence to standards for the diagnosis, investigation, and management of CAP, including the documentation of illness severity.

RESULTS

The case notes of 342 patients were reviewed. Of these, 170 patients were excluded from the study, and 172 patients met the diagnostic criteria for inclusion. A CURB-65 severity score was documented for only 4 (2.3%) patients, and a smoking history was documented for 56 (32.6%) patients. Although 17 different antibiotic regimens were used, 115 (67%) patients received co-amoxiclav and clarithromycin, which is the standard of care. Additionally, 139 (81%) patients received their first dose of antibiotics within four hours of hospital admission. There was no documentation of offering influenza or pneumococcal vaccine to high risk patients.

CONCLUSION

The clinical coding of CAP diagnosis was poor. There was very poor adherence to the CAP severity assessment and the provision of preventive measures upon hospital discharge. The development and implementation of a local hospital-based integrated care pathway may lead to more successful implementation of the guidelines.

Treatment algorithms in critical care: do they improve outcomes?

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) often have significant underlying morbidities that require complex treatment plans. Because of these complexities, numerous guidelines have been developed to facilitate the management of the critically ill patient. Some of these guidelines include sepsis, community-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia, sedation, and glycemic control. Once guidelines are written, a treatment protocol must be developed and implemented within the critical care unit. Our medical center has implemented multiple treatment protocols, often with preprinted order sets with various degrees of success. In 2003, we implemented and later evaluated a sedation order form and protocol. Patients whose sedation was initiated with a standardized order form had more frequent sedation score assessment, less time between sedation vacations, reduced ICU length of ICU stay, and a trend in reduction of ventilator days. However, only 37% of eligible patients were treated using the order form and the protocol, despite the potentially beneficial effects. Some recommendations within guidelines are based on sound clinical evidence supported by randomized controlled trials, although others are based on expert opinion only. The most often-cited reason for protocol noncompliance is disagreement with the published clinical trial data. This paper examines both infectious and noninfectious treatment guidelines and the supportive evidence that they improved patient outcomes. In addition, strategies for successful implementation of a treatment guideline are discussed for clinicians to follow in order to maximize clinical outcomes.

Performance improvement in the management of sepsis

Sepsis guidelines, although creating a base to allow change in health care practitioner behavior, do not, in and of themselves, effect change. Change only comes with institution of a PI program, converting a core of key goals of guideline recommendations to quality indicators, and giving feedback on performance. These quality indicators are tracked before or during (recommended approach) initiation of hospital-wide education to evaluate baseline performance. When combining multispecialty and multidisciplinary champions in the ED, hospital wards, ICU, and hospital administrative leadership with timely performance feedback, case failure analysis, and re-education, an opportunity to succeed in decreasing mortality in severe sepsis can be achieved. Sepsis bundle indicators require updating as new evidence emerges and new guidelines are published.(30,31)

CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE II to Assess Mortality Risk in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Community Acquired Pneumonia in PROWESS

Background: Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) comprised 35.6% of the overall phase 3 Recombinant Human Activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study and 33.1% of the placebo arm. We investigated the use of CURB-65, the Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) prediction scores to identify the CAP population from the PROWESS placebo arm at the greatest mortality risk. Methods: Patients were classified as having CAP if the lung was the primary infection site and the patient originated from home. The abilities of CURB-65, PSI, and APACHE II scores to determine the 28-day and in-hospital mortality were compared using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves and the associated areas under the curve. Results: PROWESS enrolled 278 patients with CAP in the placebo arm. The areas under the ROC curves for PSI = 5, CURB-65 ≥3, and APACHE II ≥25 for predicting 28-day (c = 0.65, 0.66, and 0.64, respectively) and in-hospital mortality (c = 0.65, 0.65, and 0.64, respectively) were not statistically different from each other. The 28-day mortality of patients with a PSI score of 5, CURB-65 ≥3, and APACHE II ≥25 was 41.6%, 37.9%, and 43.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Despite early diagnosis and appropriate antibiotic therapy, conventionally treated CAP with PSI = 5, CURB-65 ≥3, or APACHE II ≥25 has an unacceptably high mortality. In this study, PSI, CURB-65, and APACHE II scoring systems perform similarly in predicting the 28-day and in-hospital mortality; however, differences in the categorization of severe CAP were observed and there was a significant mortality in patients with a CURB-65 <3 and PSI <5.

Performance improvement in the management of sepsis

Performance improvement in medicine based on evidence-based guidelines is a persistent challenge for clinicians. Challenges include deficiencies in collaboration, resistance to change, complex algorithms, inadequate resources, and inability to collect data and provide feedback. In severe sepsis this is further compounded by the perceived importance of early intervention and considerable conflicting literature. The bundle concept first adopted for mechanically ventilated patients and then for central line insertion, has now been applied to care for the patient with severe sepsis. The bundle concept in severe sepsis facilitates the provision of best practice consistent care to eligible patients with a structure to measure compliance. Time sensitive bundle indicators allow for uniform data collection and reporting. Successful modification of clinical practice may require months or years. The success of the program relies upon the cross-departmental collaboration and support generated before implementation and the ability to deliver timely feedback to facilitate change in performance.

Curricula for teaching the content of clinical practice guidelines to family medicine and internal medicine residents in the US: a survey study

BACKGROUND

Teaching the content of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) is important to both clinical care and graduate medical education. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of curricula for teaching the content of CPGs in family medicine and internal medicine residency programs in the United States.

METHODS

We surveyed the directors of family medicine and internal medicine residency programs in the United States. The questionnaire included questions about the characteristics of the teaching of CPGs: goals and objectives, educational activities, evaluation, aspects of CPGs that the program teaches, the methods of making texts of CPGs available to residents, and the major barriers to teaching CPGs.

RESULTS

Of 434 programs responding (out of 839, 52%), 14% percent reported having written goals and objectives related to teaching CPGs. The most frequently taught aspect was the content of specific CPGs (76%). The top two educational strategies used were didactic sessions (76%) and journal clubs (64%). Auditing for adherence by residents was the primary evaluation strategy (44%), although 36% of program directors conducted no evaluation. Programs made texts of CPGs available to residents most commonly in the form of paper copies (54%) while the most important barrier was time constraints on faculty (56%).

CONCLUSION

Residency programs teach different aspects of CPGs to varying degrees, and the majority uses educational strategies not supported by research evidence.

Improving outcomes of elderly patients with community-acquired pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in elderly patients. Therefore, efforts to optimize the healthcare process for patients with CAP are warranted. An organized approach to management is likely to improve clinical results. Assessing the severity of CAP is crucial to predicting outcome, deciding the site of care, and selecting appropriate empirical therapy. Unfortunately, current prognostic scoring systems for CAP such as CURB-65 (confusion, uraemia, respiratory rate, low blood pressure and 65 years of age) or the Pneumonia Severity Index have not been validated specifically in older adults, in whom assessment of mortality risk alone might not be adequate for predicting outcomes. Obtaining a microbial diagnosis remains problematic and may be particularly challenging in frail elderly persons, who may have greater difficulties producing sputum. Effective empirical treatment involves selection of a regimen with a spectrum of activity that includes the causative pathogen. Although most cases of CAP are probably caused by a single pathogen, dual and multiple infections are increasingly being reported. Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the overriding aetiological agent, particularly in very elderly people. However, respiratory viruses and 'atypical' organisms such as Chlamydia pneumoniae are being described with increasing frequency in old patients, and aspiration pneumonia should also be taken into consideration, particularly in very elderly subjects and those with dementia. Age >65 years is a well established risk factor for infection with drug-resistant S. pneumoniae. Clinicians should be aware of additional risk factors for acquiring less common pathogens or antibacterial-resistant organisms that may suggest that additions or modifications to the basic empirical regimen are warranted. In addition to administration of antibacterials, appropriate supportive therapy, covering management of severe sepsis and septic shock, respiratory failure, as well as management of any decompensated underlying disease, may be critical to improving outcomes in elderly patients with CAP. Immunization with pneumococcal and influenza vaccines has also been demonstrated to be beneficial in numerous large studies. There is good evidence that implementation of guidelines leads to improvement in clinical outcomes in elderly patients with CAP, including a reduction in mortality. Protocols should address a comprehensive set of elements in the process of care and should periodically be evaluated to measure their effects on clinically relevant outcomes. Assessment of functional clinical outcome variables, in addition to survival, is strongly recommended for this population.

Severity scores for community-acquired pneumonia

An assessment of the severity of illness of a patient is one of the most important components of their early management. It guides decisions regarding the most appropriate site of care and the selection of empiric antibiotic therapy. In recent years, prediction tools, known as severity scores, have been promoted to assist early assessments of the severity of illness for patients with community-acquired pneumonia. Several different severity scores now exist and these have been modified over time. Each tool has particular strengths and weaknesses. This article reviews the evolution of severity scores for patients with community-acquired pneumonia and compares their performance in different patient cohorts for different outcomes of interest, as described in the published literature to date. It also discusses how these tools could be evaluated more comprehensively so that their place in patient management can be better appreciated.

Assessment of attitudes of intensive care unit staff toward clinical practice guidelines

Although studies on the implementation and adherence to specific practice guidelines have been proliferating, research examining the attitude of healthcare workers toward practice guidelines in general has been lacking. This study is a secondary analysis of data collected from 39 volunteer hospitals participating in the National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System on attitudes of intensive care unit staff regarding practice guidelines in general. Age, profession, type of intensive care unit, and race were identified as significant predictors of attitude scores in this study. Understanding the differences in perceived barriers is important for the adherence to practice guidelines.

Common causes and current guidelines

Chronic cough is a common and disabling symptom. Recent guidelines have attempted to provide direction in the clinical management of cough in both primary and secondary care. They have also provided a critical review of the available literature and identified gaps in current knowledge. Despite this they have been criticized for a reliance on a low quality evidence base. In this review, we summarize the current consensus on the clinical management of chronic cough and attempt to rationalize this based on recent evidence. We have also provided an overview of the likely pathophysiological mechanisms responsible for cough and highlighted areas, where knowledge deficits exist and suggest directions for future research. Such progress will be critical in the search for new and effective treatments for cough.

Évaluation des soins et pneumopathies aiguës communautaires

INTRODUCTION

Evaluations of care strategies for patients with community acquired pneumonia (CAP) tend to focus more on their necessity (variation in practice...) than on efficacy (adherence, impact of markers of disease severity or medico-economic factors...).

STATE OF THE ART

A number of studies are reported in the literature based on a simple evaluation of practice at a given moment on time or else on the impact of guidelines. These evaluations relate either to outcome criteria (mortality, and duration of stay especially) or the economic impact of CAP (rate of hospitalization, duration of stay, costs of the treatments or hospitalizations...), or on process of care (evaluation of initial severity, delay in administration of antibiotics, appropriateness of antibiotic therapy, evaluation of oxygenation and taking of specimens prior to treatment).

PERSPECTIVES AND CONCLUSIONS

Taken together these studies demonstrate the need to improve and standardise care. Where studies have not found a benefit from guidelines this can often be attributed to problems with assessment or study design and there are many studies showing the benefit of guideline based management and the introduction of standardised care pathways.

[Evaluation of clinical practice in patients admitted with community-acquired pneumonia over a 4-year period]

OBJECTIVE

Since March 2000 we have been using a clinical practice guideline in the management of patients diagnosed with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). The objective of this study was to analyze the evolution of quality of care received by these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was a prospective observational study comparing the process of care and outcomes of 4 consecutive 1-year periods (March 1, 2000 through February 29, 2004) in patients admitted for CAP.

RESULTS

Over the 4 years studied, the following statistically significant trends were observed: reductions in hospital admissions (P< .001), length of hospital stay (P< .05), and total duration of antibiotic treatment (P< .05); and increases in the coverage of atypical pathogens (P< .001) and administration of antibiotics within 8 hours of hospital arrival (P< .001). No significant differences were found in readmissions within 30 days, or in-hospital and 30-day mortality. Two other areas for improvement were also identified: a low percentage of admissions to the intensive care unit (4.4%) and the rate of unnecessary hospitalization of low-risk patients (36.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic monitoring of the indicators of our clinical guidelines provided us with information about our clinical practice and facilitated an evaluation of the same. Many of these indicators were found to have evolved favorably and areas of improvement were identified.

How to fight antimicrobial resistance

Antimicrobial misuse results in the development of resistance and superbugs. Over recent decades, resistance has been increasing despite continuing efforts to control it, resulting in increased mortality and cost. Many authorities have proposed local, regional and national guidelines to fight against this phenomenon, and the usefulness of these programmes has been evaluated. Multifaceted intervention seems to be the most efficient method to control antimicrobial resistance. Monitoring of bacterial resistance and antibiotic use is essential, and the methodology has now been homogenized. The implementation of guidelines and infection control measures does not control antimicrobial resistance and needs to be reinforced by associated measures. Educational programmes and rotation policies have not been evaluated sufficiently in the literature. Combination antimicrobial therapy is inefficient in controlling antimicrobial resistance.

Improved clinical outcomes with utilization of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline

BACKGROUND

We previously reported decreased mortality following implementation of a community-acquired pneumonia guideline derived from specialty society recommendations. However, patients with respiratory failure and sepsis from pneumonia were not included, adjustment for comorbidities was limited, and no guideline compliance data were available. We also questioned whether decreased mortality continued after 1997.

METHODS

We utilized Utah data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid from 1993 to 2003 to determine if pneumonia guideline implementation was associated with 30-day all-cause mortality, length of hospital stay, and readmission rate. We adjusted outcomes by age, gender, Deyo comorbidity score, prior hospitalizations, and race. Guideline compliance was measured by initial default guideline antibiotic administration. We included patients > or = 66 years old with primary International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes 480.0-483.9, 485.0-486.9, 487.0, 507.0 or 518.81, and 038.x with secondary code pneumonia. We excluded patients with prior hospitalization within 10 days, patients with HIV infection or transplant recipients, and patients not treated by physicians closely affiliated with study hospitals.

RESULTS

Mean (+/- SD) age of 17,728 pneumonia patients admitted to the hospital was 72.3 +/- 12.0 years, 55.2% were female, and 96.0% were white. Within Intermountain Healthcare hospitals, a 1-SD increase (10%) in guideline compliance (range, 61 to 100%) was associated with mortality odds ratio (OR) of 0.92 (95% confidence interval[CI], 0.87 to 0.98; p = 0.007). Mortality OR at 16 Intermountain Healthcare hospitals was 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82 to 0.97; p = 0.007) compared with 19 other Utah hospitals. This mortality difference corresponds to approximately 20 lives saved yearly. The readmission rate was also lower.

CONCLUSION

Improved clinical outcomes were associated with pneumonia guideline utilization.

Guidelines for severe infections: are they useful?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The large variability in clinical practice plus the increasing awareness that certain processes of care are associated with improved medical outcomes has led to the development of clinical practice guidelines in serious infection. The evolution of guidelines and their impact on delivery of care in severe infection is reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Guidelines development has centered around community- and hospital-acquired pneumonia as well as sepsis. The Institute of Healthcare Improvement has emerged as an international leader in changing healthcare professional behavior to be consistent with clinical recommendations in infection-related morbidity. These educational programs are designed to increase awareness of guidelines recommendations and to optimize their implementation. Change bundles are selected sets of interventions or processes distilled from evidence-based practice guidelines that are likely to improve outcome. As new evidence is published, and as experts ponder how the guidelines should best be expressed in the bundles, the bundles will be adapted to optimize their utility.

SUMMARY

The change bundle approach to performance improvement (guidelines-based) is the key to change in practice. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign/Institute of Healthcare Improvement sepsis change bundles are an excellent example of progress along these lines.

Prospective evaluation of the treatment and outcome of community-acquired pneumonia according to the Pneumonia Severity Index in VHA hospitals

The objective of the study were to determine if nationally recognized community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines (specific to antibiotic therapy) were being followed and to identify outcomes of treatment in hospitals that are VHA members. This was a prospective study using a medication use evaluation in an inpatient setting conducted in 46 institutions in the United States during the 1998-1999 CAP season. The subjects were 875 adult patients (> or =18 years of age) admitted from the emergency department or ambulatory care setting with a chest X-ray-confirmed diagnosis of CAP. Treatment pathways were in place in 58.7% (27/46) of institutions, with 18.3% of patients treated according to pathways. Twenty-seven percent of patients were PSI class I or II. A pathogen (blood or sputum) was identified in <10% of patients. The first dose of antibiotic was administered to patients 65% of the time in the emergency department. Antibiotic therapy in 592 of the 694 admitted to a general medical unit (mortality rate, 3%) complied with 1998 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines compared with 26 of the 65 admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) (mortality rate, 4.6%). In patients admitted to other nongeneral medical, non-ICU areas, IDSA guidelines were followed in 95% of the patients. Mean length of stay and mortality for PSI classes I-V were 4.5, 4.6, 6.9, 6.2, and 7.1 days, respectively, and 0%, 0.7%, 1.1%, 2.5%, and 10.5%, respectively. Antibiotic therapy was modified in 733 of 875 patients. Approximately 90% of patients were eligible for conversion to oral (per os) therapy before discontinuation of parenteral (intravenous) antibiotics (mean time to eligibility, 1.8 days of parenteral antibiotics), with conversion in 65% (mean time to conversion to oral therapy, 4.6 days). Resolution of CAP occurred in 92% of patients; deterioration was more common in PSI class IV and V patients. In conclusion, inhospital mortality rates for all PSI classes were similar to those found in other recently conducted studies despite limited adherence to pathways. Greater use of treatment guidelines for patients admitted to the ICU and awareness of the intravenous to per os antibiotic conversion process are suggested.

Interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing practices for hospital inpatients

BACKGROUND

Up to 50% of antibiotic usage in hospitals is inappropriate. In hospitals infections caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria are associated with higher mortality, morbidity and prolonged hospital stay compared with infections caused by antibiotic-susceptible bacteria. Clostridium difficile associated diarrhoea (CDAD) is a hospital acquired infection that is caused by antibiotic prescribing.

OBJECTIVES

To estimate the effectiveness of professional interventions that alone, or in combination, are effective in promoting prudent antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients, to evaluate the impact of these interventions on reducing the incidence of antimicrobial resistant pathogens or CDAD and their impact on clinical outcome.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care (EPOC) specialized register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE from 1980 to November 2003. Additional studies were obtained from the bibliographies of retrieved articles

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomised and controlled clinical trials (RCT/CCT), controlled before and after studies (CBA) and interrupted time series (ITS) studies of antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients. Interventions included any professional or structural interventions as defined by EPOC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers extracted data and assessed quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Sixty six studies were included and 51 (77%) showed a significant improvement in at least one outcome. Six interventions only aimed to increase treatment, 57 interventions aimed to decrease treatment and three interventions aimed to both increase and decrease treatment. The intervention target was the decision to prescribe antibiotics (one study), timing of first dose (six studies), the regimen (drug, dosing interval etc, 61 studies) or the duration of treatment (10 studies); 12 studies had more than one target. Of the six interventions that aimed to increase treatment, five reported a significant improvement in drug outcomes and one a significant improvement in clinical outcome. Of the 60 interventions that aimed to decrease treatment 47 reported drug outcomes of which 38 (81%) significantly improved, 16 reported microbiological outcomes of which 12 (75%) significantly improved and nine reported clinical outcomes of which two (22%) significantly deteriorated and 3 (33%) significantly improved. Five studies aimed to reduce CDAD. Three showed a significant reduction in CDAD. Due to differences in study design and duration of follow up it was only possible to perform meta-regression on a few studies.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The results show that interventions to improve antibiotic prescribing to hospital inpatients are successful, and can reduce antimicrobial resistance or hospital acquired infections.

Guidelines for the Treatment of Community-acquired Pneumonia

RATIONALE

Some studies highlight the association of better clinical responses with adherence to guidelines for empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), but little is known about factors that influence this adherence.

OBJECTIVES

Our objectives were to identify factors influencing adherence to the guidelines for empiric treatment of CAP, and to evaluate the impact of adherence on outcome.

METHODS

We studied 1,288 patients with CAP admitted to 13 Spanish hospitals. Collected variables included the patients' clinical and demographic data, initial severity of the disease, antibiotic treatment, and specialty and training status of the prescribing physician.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Adherence to guidelines was high (79.7%), with significant differences between hospitals (range, 47-97%) and physicians (pneumologists, 81%; pneumology residents, 84%; nonpneumology residents, 82%; other specialists, 67%). The independent factors related to higher adherence were hospital, physician characteristics, and initial high-risk class of Fine, whereas admission to intensive care unit decreased adherence. Seventy-four patients died (6.1%), and treatment failure was found in 175 patients (14.2%). After adjusting for Fine risk class, adherence to the guidelines was found protective for mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.3-0.9) and for treatment failure (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.5-0.9). Treatment prescribed by pneumologists and residents was associated with lower treatment failure (OR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to guidelines mainly depends on the hospital and the specialty and training status of prescribing physicians. Nonadherence was higher in nonpneumology specialists, and is an independent risk factor for treatment failure and mortality.

Hospital pharmacists' awareness of a new antibiotic guideline in the UK: implications for practice

OBJECTIVES

Pharmacists play an important role in the review of local hospital guidelines. British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines for the management of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) were updated in 2001, and it is important that individual hospital recommendations are based upon this national guidance. The aim of this study was to identify UK Chief Pharmacists' awareness of these updated guidelines one year after their publication. Secondary aims were to identify whether pharmacists had subsequently initiated revision of institutional CAP guidelines, and what roles different professional staff had performed in this process.

METHOD

A self-completion postal questionnaire was sent to the Chief Pharmacist (or their nominated staff) in 253 UK NHS hospitals in November 2002. This aimed to identify issues relating to their awareness of the 2001 BTS guidelines and subsequent revision of their hospital's guidelines.

RESULTS

188 questionnaires were returned (a response rate of 74%), of which 164 hospitals had local antibiotic prescribing guidelines. Respondents in 29% of these hospitals were unaware of the 2001 BTS publication and institutional guidelines had been revised in only 51% of hospitals where the Chief Pharmacist was purportedly aware of the new BTS guidance. Generally, more staff types were involved in revising guidelines than initiating revision.

CONCLUSIONS

Variability existed in both Chief Pharmacists' awareness of new national guidance and subsequent review processes operating in individual hospitals. A lack of proactive reaction to new national guidance was identified in some hospitals, and it is hoped that the establishment of specialist "infectious diseases pharmacists" will facilitate the review of institutional antibiotic prescribing guidelines in the future.

Quality of antibiotic use for lower respiratory tract infections at hospitals: (how) can we measure it?

BACKGROUND

To assess and improve the quality of antibiotic use in patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECB), a valid set of quality indicators is required. This set should also be applicable in practice.

METHODS

Guidelines and literature were reviewed to derive potential indicators for quality of antibiotic use in treating hospitalized patients with lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI). To assess the evidence base of each indicator, a literature review was performed. Grade A recommendations were considered valid. For grade B-D recommendations, an expert panel performed a consensus procedure on the indicator's relevance to patient health, reduction of antimicrobial resistance, and cost containment. To test applicability in practice, feasibility, opportunity for improvement, reliability, and case-mix stability were determined for a data set of 899 hospitalized patients with LRTI.

RESULTS

None of the potential indicators from guidelines and literature were supported by grade A evidence. Nineteen indicators were selected by consensus procedure (12 indicators for CAP and 7 indicators for AECB). Lack of feasibility and of opportunity for improvement led to the exclusion of 4 indicators. A final set of 15 indicators was defined (9 indicators for CAP and 6 indicators for AECB).

CONCLUSIONS

A valid set of quality indicators for antibiotic use in hospitalized patients with LRTI was developed by combining evidence and expert opinion in a carefully planned procedure. Subjecting indicators to an applicability test is essential before using them in quality-improvement projects. In our demonstration setting, 4 of the 19 indicators were inapplicable in practice.

Clinical pathway care improves outcomes among patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia

PURPOSE

To examine the impact of a unique evidence-based clinical pathway on six outcomes of care in patients hospitalized for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of CAP patients discharged between January 1999 and December 2001, from 31 Adventist Health System institutions nationwide. A total of 22,196 records were available for multivariate analyses. Odds ratios (OR) for the outcomes were calculated and stratified by a unique severity score. The severity score ranged from 1 to 5, where 5 indicated the most severe condition.

RESULTS

Pathway patients were significantly less likely to die in-hospital compared with non-pathway patients in four of the five severity strata (OR in severity level 1=0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-0.70). In all severity strata, pathway patients were approximately twice as likely as non-pathway patients to receive blood cultures and appropriate antibiotic therapy. Among patients who were classified as severity level 1, pathway patients experienced an 80% reduction in the odds of respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (OR=0.20; 95% CI, 0.12-0.33).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who were placed on pneumonia clinical pathway care were much more likely than non-pathway patients to have favorable outcomes of care.

Local guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia: development, implementation, and outcome studies

Published outcome studies mostly report a positive effect of successfully implemented pneumonia guidelines. Confirmatory studies are needed that use randomized, parallel groups with precisely defined treatments, however. Further research also is needed to develop methodology for more easily providing guideline logic to clinicians at the point of care.

Extending the Nurse Practitioner Concurrent Intervention Model to Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

BACKGROUND

A Nurse Practitioner (NP) Concurrent Intervention Model shown effective for controlling telemetry usage was extended to patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

METHODS

In spring 2000, investigators at Hackensack University Medical Center and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey-New Jersey Medical School began an intervention to increase compliance with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) performance measures for CAP. Cost-reduction efforts were introduced by using previously described criteria for switching from intravenous to oral medication and for hospital discharge.

RESULTS

Use of the NP intervention model for patients admitted with CAP and for COPD patients resulted in significant reductions in length of stay and cost savings.

DISCUSSION

Concurrent intervention by a nurse practitioner can help achieve excellent compliance with performance measures for CAP and be applied to other chronic respiratory diseases such as COPD.

Importance of severity of illness assessment in management of lower respiratory infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with lower respiratory infections display a wide spectrum of disease severity. Management decisions regarding site of care, extent of investigations and level of treatment are mainly based on disease severity. Several severity assessment tools are still undergoing evaluation. This review highlights recent relevant studies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Severity prediction rules such as the Pneumonia Severity Index cannot be relied upon as the sole means of identifying patients with lower respiratory infections who do not need hospital admission. Up to 40% of patients assigned to low-risk groups may require hospitalization. The most common medical reason for hospitalization in these circumstances is the presence of unstable comorbid illness. Social factors are equally important in the decision to admit. A new prediction rule based on the British Thoracic Society prediction rule has been proposed. This divides patients with community acquired pneumonia into three management groups based on risk of mortality. A prediction rule for use in patients with HIV-associated community acquired pneumonia has also been proposed. An IL-10 polymorphism has been identified as a prognostic factor in community acquired pneumonia. Audits examining the impact of adherence to severity-based guidelines on the outcome of community acquired pneumonia have revealed conflicting results. Differences in outcome may only be significant for patients with the most severe illness.

SUMMARY

Severity of illness assessment is important in guiding management options at various stages in the clinical course of lower respiratory infections. However, no prediction rule should supercede clinical judgment.

Community-acquired pneumonia

This seminar reviews important features and management issues of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) that are especially relevant to immunocompetent adults in light of new information about cause, clinical course, diagnostic testing, treatment, and prevention. Streptococcus pneumoniae remains the most important pathogen; however, emerging resistance of this organism to antimicrobial agents has affected empirical treatment of CAP. Atypical pathogens have been quite commonly identified in several prospective studies. The clinical significance of these pathogens (with the exception of Legionella spp) is not clear, partly because of the lack of rapid, standardised tests. Diagnostic evaluation of CAP is important for appropriate assessment of severity of illness and for establishment of the causative agent in the disease. Until better rapid diagnostic methods are developed, most patients will be treated empirically. Antimicrobials continue to be the mainstay of treatment, and decisions about specific agents are guided by several considerations that include spectrum of activity, and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic principles. Several factors have been shown to be associated with a beneficial clinical outcome in patients with CAP. These factors include administration of antimicrobials in a timely manner, choice of antibiotic therapy, and the use of a critical pneumonia pathway. The appropriate use of vaccines against pneumococcal disease and influenza should be encouraged. Several guidelines for management of CAP have recently been published, the recommendations of which are reviewed.

Cost-effectiveness of community-acquired pneumonia therapy

Community-acquired pneumonia is a common disease in adults and substantially contributes to morbidity and mortality in the USA and worldwide. Due to the significant costs associated with this disease, there is increasing pressure to evaluate the variation in practices among healthcare providers. The processes of care related to the diagnosis, management and prevention of community-acquired pneumonia are reviewed. Furthermore, the cost-effective strategies for community-acquired pneumonia and the medical evidence that support their usage are outlined.

Clinical role of beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations

The use of beta-lactamase inhibitors in combination with beta-lactam antibiotics is currently the most successful strategy to combat a specific resistance mechanism. Their broad spectrum of activity originates from the ability of respective inhibitors to inactivate a wide range of beta-lactamases produced by Gram-positive, Gram-negative, anaerobic and even acid-fast pathogens. Clinical experience confirms their effectiveness in the empirical treatment of respiratory, intra-abdominal, and skin and soft tissue infections. There is evidence to suggest that they are efficacious in treating patients with neutropenic fever and nosocomial infections, especially in combination with other agents. beta-Lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are particularly useful against mixed infections. Their role in treating various multi-resistant pathogens such as Acinetobacter species and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia are gaining importance. Although, generally, they do not constitute reliable therapy against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producers, their substitution in place of cephalosporins appears to reduce emergence of the latter pathogens. Similarly, their use may also curtail the emergence of other resistant pathogens such as Clostridium difficile and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. beta-Lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations are generally well tolerated and their oral forms provide effective outpatient therapy against many commonly encountered infections. In certain scenarios, they could even be more cost-effective than conventional combination therapies. With the accumulation of so much clinical experience, their role in the management of infections is now becoming more clearly defined.

Current Management Issues Associated with Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a significant cause of morbidity, mortality, and increased cost. Despite numerous managementguidelines, CAP continues to existas a challenge to the learned clinician. Due to a lack of sensitive diagnostic testing, causative pathogens are often not identified, making most therapy empiric. Increasing levels of bacterial resistance to available antimicrobials worldwide has been implicated in driving up the costs of treatment and adversely effecting clinical outcomes. Pharmacists can be part of the solution by encouraging appropriate antimicrobial selection based on resistance patterns in their communities and ensuring appropriate vaccines are employed to prevent CAP.

Community-acquired Pneumonia: Compliance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Guidelines, and Factors Associated with Outcome

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to evaluate the impact of adherence to national guidelines for management of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) on patient outcomes.

METHODS

Compliance with published national guidelines was assessed. Mortality rate and length of hospital stay were determined.

RESULTS

Patients who were administered antibiotics within 4 hours of admission had a shorter stay. Those treated at least 8 hours after admission had the highest mortality. Good compliance seen with 1998 guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America declined substantially when 2000 Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines were evaluated. Pediatric compliance was difficult to evaluate. Documentation of vaccination screening and administration was poor.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic therapy should be started within 4 hours in patients with CAP. Using the most recent CAP guidelines as a benchmark may lower compliance unless providers are reeducated. National consensus guidelines for pediatric patients should be developed. Hospitals should evaluate documentation of vaccine screening and administration and should implement programs to increase vaccination rates if needed.

Evaluation of outcomes in community-acquired pneumonia: a guide for patients, physicians, and policy-makers

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a key target for research and quality improvement in acute medicine. However, many of the outcome measures used in prognostic and antibiotic studies are not validated and do not capture features of outcome that are important to patients. Substitutes for traditional outcome measures include a recently validated patient-based symptom questionnaire (the CAP-Sym) and process-of-care measures. The interpretation of outcomes also depends on the quality of the study design and methods used. This paper discusses the advantages and disadvantages of outcome, process-of-care, and economic measures in CAP and the interpretation of these measures in randomised and observational studies. A core set of measures for use in clinical CAP research and performance measurement is proposed.

Status of practice guidelines in the United States: CDC guidelines as an example

BACKGROUND

Clinical practice guidelines have proliferated in the past several decades, starting with only a handful in the 1980s to over 1000 approved through The National Guideline Clearinghouse in 2002.

METHODS

The purposes of this article to review research related to guideline adoption and impact and to make recommendations for assessing the outcomes of guidelines, using the CDC guideline process as an example.

RESULTS

Despite the national movement toward standardization of evidence-based practice, few studies have been conducted to assess the costs of guideline development and implementation, and some practice guidelines have been implemented without concomitant assessment on patient outcomes and costs and benefits of changes in care.

CONCLUSIONS

An immediate mandate is to ensure that when guidelines are promulgated, they include an evaluation plan, developed by the implementer of the guideline, which takes advantage of existing qualitative and quantitative data and programs (e.g., patient-centered care, quality assurance, risk management) not limited to expensive and sophisticated clinical trials.