Influence of cytomegalovirus seropositivity on outcome after T cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: contrasting results between recipients of grafts from related and unrelated donors

Real world experience: Examining outcomes using letermovir for CMV prophylaxis in high-risk allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell patients in the setting of using T-cell depletion as GVHD prophylaxis

BACKGROUND

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection significantly impacts the morbidity and mortality of patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). Despite monitoring and pharmacologic prophylaxis with drugs such as valganciclovir or ganciclovir, rates of early CMV reactivation have continually persisted, contributing to increased rates of morbidity and mortality in allogeneic-HSCT patients. This study evaluates the outcomes of letermovir in preventing CMV reactivation and CMV-related complications in HSCT recipients with initiation of therapy at +21 days in high-risk patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed adult patients at University of Southern California (USC) Norris Cancer Hospital who received allogeneic-HSCT from 2018 to 2020 with subsequent serial CMV monitoring and treatment. CMV reactivation was determined in patients if they had clinically significant serum CMV viremia (viremia requiring treatment) or organ involvement by day+100. Primary endpoint assessed was day+100 rates of CMV reactivation. Secondary end-points included 1-year OS, 1-year RFS, and incidence of GVHD. Descriptive statistics were used to compare characteristics between groups used in this study, with a significance level of α = 0.05.

RESULTS

Between 2018 and 2020, 116 adult HSCT recipients were reviewed. 51% were male and 49% were female; donor sources consisted of 27% match related donor (MRD) 28% match-unrelated donor (MUD), and 45% haploidentical donor. Of the 116 patients, 92 were identified as high-risk for CMV reactivation. 71 patients received letermovir prophylaxis, and 21 patients received no prophylaxis. In high-risk patients, after adjusting for GVHD status and transplant type, patients that received letermovir had no statistically significant difference of having D + 100 CMV reactivation compared to patients that did not receive letermovir. 1.02 (95% CI: 0.35, 3.20) (p = 0.97). Moreover, there were no statistically significant difference observed between letermovir treatment and 1-year OS, 1-year RFS, and incidence of GVHD.

CONCLUSION

Patients in the high-risk letermovir group had outcomes that were comparable to the lower risk "non-letermovir" group. There was no significant difference in CMV D + 100 reactivation between high-risk patients who did not receive letermovir compared to the patients who did. While other studies have shown that early initiation of letermovir may be associated with improved outcomes, our study shows that the use of letermovir with initiation at 21 days may not necessarily translate to improved secondary outcomes such as overall survival. Further prospective studies evaluating the time of initiating therapy and outcomes are needed.

Cytomegalovirus infection may be oncoprotective against neoplasms of B-lymphocyte lineage: single-institution experience and survey of global evidence

Background

Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) is not considered tumorigenic, there is evidence for its oncomodulatory effects and association with hematological neoplasms. Conversely, a number of experimental and clinical studies suggest its putative anti-tumour effect. We investigated the potential connection between chronic CMV infection in patients with B-lymphocyte (B-cell) malignancies in a retrospective single-center study and extracted relevant data on CMV prevalences and the incidences of B-cell cancers the world over.

Methods

In the clinical single-center study, prevalence of chronic CMV infection was compared between patients with B-cell leukemia/lymphoma and the healthy controls. Also, global data on CMV seroprevalences and the corresponding country-specific incidences of B- lineage neoplasms worldwide were investigated for potential correlations.

Results

Significantly higher CMV seropositivity was observed in control subjects than in patients with B-cell malignancies (p = 0.035). Moreover, an unexpected seroepidemiological evidence of highly significant inverse relationship between country-specific CMV prevalence and the annual incidence of B-cell neoplasms was noted across the populations worldwide (ρ = −0.625, p < 0.001).

Conclusions

We try to draw attention to an unreported interplay between CMV infection and B-cell lymphomagenesis in adults. A large-scale survey across > 70 countries disclosed a link between CMV and B-cell neoplasms. Our evidence hints at an antagonistic effect of chronic CMV infection against B-lymphoproliferation.

The changing impact of cytomegalovirus among hematopoietic cell transplant recipients during the past decade: A single institutional cohort study

BACKGROUND

With advancements in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT), the need for cytomegalovirus (CMV) surveillance persists.

METHODS

We present a retrospective analysis on the impact of CMV with preemptive therapy in 1,065 alloHCT patients with donor and/or recipient CMV seropositivity from 2009-2019.

RESULTS

51% developed clinically significant CMV infection (CMV-CSI); 6.5% had CMV disease. In multivariate analysis stratified by serostatus and preparative regimen the use of ATG (HR 2.97, 95% CI 2.00 to 4.42, P < 0.001) was associated with development of CMV-CSI. Median length of stay for index hospitalization was longer in patients with CMV-CSI (27 d vs 25 d, respectively; P = .002), as were rates (32.9% vs 17.7%; P < .001) and duration (9 d vs 6 d; P < .001) of rehospitalization, and median total inpatient days (28 d vs 26 d; P < .001). Patients with CMV-CSI had higher rates of neutropenia (47% vs 20%; P < .001) and transfusion support (PRBC, median 5 vs 3; P < .001; platelets, median 3 vs 3; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Preemptive therapy does not negate the impact of CMV-CSI on peri-engraftment toxicity and healthcare utilization. This cohort represents a large single center study on the impact of CMV in the pre-letermovir era and serves as a real-world comparator for assessing the impact of future prophylaxis. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Letermovir Prophylaxis Decreases Burden of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) in Patients at High Risk for CMV Disease Following Hematopoietic Cell Transplant

Despite effective therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to have a significant impact on morbidity and mortality in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. At particular risk are recipients of alternative grafts such as umbilical cord blood (UCB), haploidentical transplants (haplo), or patients conditioned with T-cell depleting regimens such as anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG). With the approval of letermovir, its impact on high-risk patients is of particular interest. To evaluate the impact of letermovir prophylaxis at our center, we performed a retrospective analysis of 114 high-risk patients who received letermovir as prophylaxis (LET PPX) between January 2018 through December 2019, including 30 UCB and 22 haplo recipients, compared with 637 historical controls with comparable risk between January 2013 and December 2019. By post-transplant day 100 (D+100), letermovir prophylaxis significantly decreased the incidence of both CMV DNAemia compared with controls (45.37% versus 74.1%; P < .001) and clinically significant CMV infection (12.04% versus 48.82%; P < .001). The impact of LET PPX was even more profound on the incidence of clinically significant CMV infection (CSI), defined as the administration of antiviral therapy as preemptive therapy for CMV DNAemia or treatment for CMV disease. CSI was significantly lower in haplo recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (13.64% versus 73.33%; P= .02) and UCB recipients on LET PPX compared with controls (3.45% versus 37.5%; P < .001). No patients on LET primary PPX developed CMV disease in any treatment group by D+100 compared with controls (0% versus 5.34%, respectively; P = .006). Patients on LET PPX had fewer hospitalizations involving initiation of anti-CMV therapy compared with controls (0.93% versus 15.23%, respectively). Our analysis of the largest cohort of patients at high risk for CMV reactivation published to date demonstrates that letermovir prophylaxis significantly reduces the number of patients who receive CMV-active antiviral therapy for either DNAemia or disease due to CMV.

Hematopoietic cell transplant outcomes after myeloablative conditioning with fludarabine, busulfan, low-dose total body irradiation, and rabbit antithymocyte globulin

Optimal conditioning and graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) are unknown. Here, we report on outcomes after low toxicity, myeloablative conditioning consisting of fludarabine, busulfan, and 4 Gy total body irradiation, in combination with thymoglobulin and post-transplant methotrexate and cyclosporine. We retrospectively studied 700 patients with hematologic malignancies who received blood stem cells from 7 to 8/8 HLA-matched unrelated or related donors. Median follow-up of surviving patients was 5 years. At 5 years, overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS), and chronic GVHD/relapse-free survival (cGRFS) were 58%, 55%, and 40%. Risk factors for poor OS, RFS, and cGRFS were (1). high to very high disease risk index (DRI), (2). high recipient age, and (3). cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive recipient with seronegative donor (D-R+). The latter risk factor applied particularly to patients with lymphoid malignancies. Neither donor other than HLA-matched sibling (7-8/8 unrelated) nor one HLA allele mismatch was risk factors for poor OS, RFS, or cGRFS. In conclusion, the above regimen results in excellent long-term outcomes. The outcomes are negatively impacted by older age, high or very high DRI, and CMV D-R+ serostatus, but not by donor unrelatedness or one HLA allele mismatch.

Letermovir for the prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease in transplant recipients: an evidence-based review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a leading opportunistic infection in immune compromised patients, including allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell (HSCT) or solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients, where primary infection or reactivation is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Antiviral drugs are the mainstay for the prevention of CMV infection and disease, most commonly with valganciclovir. However, valganciclovir use is often associated with adverse drug reactions, most notably leukopenia and neutropenia, and its widespread use has led to emergence of antiviral resistance. Foscarnet and cidofovir, however, are associated with nephrotoxicity. Letermovir, a novel CMV viral terminase inhibitor drug, was recently approved for CMV prophylaxis in allogeneic HSCT recipients. It has a favorable pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile. The aim of this paper is to review the evidence supporting the use of letermovir in allogeneic HSCT recipients, and how the drug impacts our contemporary clinical practice. In addition, we discuss the ongoing clinical trial of letermovir for the prevention of CMV in SOT recipients. The use of letermovir for treatment of CMV infection and disease is not yet approved. However, because of a unique mechanism of activity, we provide our perspective on the potential role of letermovir in the treatment of ganciclovir-resistant CMV infection and disease. Furthermore, drug-resistant CMV has emerged during use of letermovir for prophylaxis and treatment. Caution is advised on its use in order to preserve its therapeutic lifespan.

T Cell Depletion as an Alternative Approach for Patients 55 Years or Older Undergoing Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as Curative Therapy for Hematologic Malignancies

T cell-depleted (TCD) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is curative treatment for hematologic malignancies in adults, shown to reduce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) without increased relapse. We retrospectively reviewed a single-center, 11-year experience of 214 patients aged ≥ 55 years to determine tolerability and efficacy in the older adult. Most patients (70%) had myeloid diseases, and most acute leukemias were in remission. Median age was 61 years, with related and unrelated donors ≥8/10 HLA matched. Hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index scores were intermediate and high for 84%. Conditioning regimens were all myeloablative. Grafts were peripheral blood stem cells (97%) containing CD3 dose ≤103-4/kg body weight, without pharmacologic GVHD prophylaxis. With median follow-up of 70 months among survivors, Kaplan-Meier estimates of overall and relapse-free survival were 44% and 41%, respectively (4 years). Cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality at day +100 was only 10%. Incidence of GVHD for acute (grades II to IV) was 9% at day +100 and for chronic was 7% at 2 and 4 years (8 extensive, 1 overlap). Median Karnofsky performance status for patients > 2 years post-transplant was 90%. As 1 of the largest reports for patients ≥2 aged ≥55 years receiving TCD HSCTs, it demonstrates curative therapy with minimal GVHD, similar to that observed in a younger population.

Cytomegalovirus Status and the Outcome of T Cell-Replete Reduced-Intensity Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus of donor and recipient are frequently used in algorithms of donor selection, whereas the impact of CMV reactivation on transplantation-related mortality, leukemia control, and overall survival (OS) remains controversial. Therefore, we retrospectively studied the impact of latent or active CMV infections on the outcome and occurrence of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 294 patients during the period from 2004 to 2010. CMV viral load was routinely monitored in plasma using a quantitative PCR. Preemptive antiviral therapy was initiated when the viral load in plasma exceeded a predefined threshold. In a proportional hazards model, a seropositive recipient was significantly associated with increased occurrence of acute GVHD. However the CMV serostatus of both recipient and donor and the presence of active CMV infection was not associated with the occurrence of relapses, chronic GVHD, or OS. We conclude that in the presence of viral load monitoring and preemptive treatment, latent or active CMV infection does not substantially affect the OS after T cell-replete RIC allogeneic SCT.

Impact of Donor and Recipient Cytomegalovirus Serostatus on Outcomes of Antithymocyte Globulin-Conditioned Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Although previous studies involving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) without in vivo T cell depletion by rabbit antithymocyte globulin (ATG) have reported a substantial survival difference between D-R- and D+R- patients, but little to no survival difference between D-R+ and D+R+ patients (D, donor; R, recipient; +, cytomegalovirus [CMV] seropositive; -, CMV seronegative), whether this applies to HCT using ATG is unknown. We studied 928 patients who underwent myeloablative HCT for hematologic malignancies in Alberta between 1999 and 2014 who received graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis using ATG (Thymoglobulin, 4.5 mg/kg) in addition to methotrexate and cyclosporine. D-R- and D+R- patients had similar survival (no significant difference). D-R+ patients had a substantially lower survival than D+R+ patients (41% versus 59% at 5 years; P = .001). This difference was attributed to higher nonrelapse mortality, apparently due to higher GVHD-associated mortality. Survival rates were also lower for D-R+ HLA-matched sibling transplant recipients compared with D+R+ HLA-matched unrelated donor transplant recipients (44% versus 66% at 5 years; P = .009). In conclusion, when using ATG, choosing a seronegative donor for a seronegative patient is relatively unimportant, whereas choosing a seropositive donor for a seropositive patient is important, even if this requires the use of a seropositive matched unrelated donor graft.

Vaccine therapy for cytomegalovirus in the setting of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation

Passive immunization against CMV is desirable to minimize or perhaps eliminate complications related to CMV disease. In allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT), the major challenge facing a successful anti-CMV vaccine is inducing immunity in an immunocompromised host. To date, only one CMV vaccine, ASP0113, has been evaluated in a randomized, placebo-controlled Phase II study. ASP0113 is a bivalent product containing two plasmids that encode CMV glycoprotein B and tegument phosphoprotein 65, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in rate of initiation of anti-CMV therapy, rates of CMV viremia were lower in the ASP0113 group when measured by a central laboratory. Also, time-to-first episode of viremia was longer in subjects receiving ASP0113. These findings paved the way for an ongoing placebo-controlled Phase III study aiming at enrolling 500 subjects. Results of this Phase III trial, especially if it meets clinically meaningful endpoints, will ultimately determine the role of anti-CMV vaccine strategies in allo-HCT.

Cytomegalovirus infection in patients who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in Portugal: a five-year retrospective review

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is 1 of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (aHSCT), mainly within the first 100 days after transplantation. We aimed to characterize CMV infection in a cohort of 305 patients with different malignancies undergoing aHSCT at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Porto between January 2008 and December 2012. In total, 184 patients (60.3%) developed CMV infection, mainly viral reactivations rather than primary infections (96.2% versus 3.8%, respectively). The majority of patients (166 of 184) developed CMV infection ≤100 days after transplantation, with median time to infection of 29 days (range, 0 to 1285) and median duration of infection of 10 days (range, 2 to 372). Multivariate analysis revealed that CMV infection was increased in donor (D)-/recipient (R)+ and D+/R+ (odds ratio [OR], 10.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.35 to 25.4; P < .001) and in patients with mismatched or unrelated donors (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.34 to 4.80; P = .004). Cox regression model showed that the risk of death was significantly increased in patients >38 years old (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.14 to 3.12; P = .0137), who underwent transplantation with peripheral blood (OR, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.33 to 6.86; P = .008), with mismatched or unrelated donor (OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.48 to 3.13; P < .001), and who developed CMV infection (OR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.07 to 2.90; P = .025). Moreover, patients who developed CMV infection had a significantly reduced median post-transplantation survival (16 versus 36 months; P = .002).

The clinical and financial burden of pre-emptive management of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation-implications for preventative treatment approaches

BACKGROUND AIMS

Although cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) is rarely fatal, the management of CMV by pre-emptive medication for viral reactivation has toxicity and carries a financial burden. New strategies to prevent CMV reactivation with vaccines and antiviral T cells may represent an advance over pre-emptive strategies but have yet to be justified in terms of transplantation outcome and cost.

METHODS

We compared outcomes and post-transplantation treatment cost in 44 patients who never required pre-emptive CMV treatment with 90 treated patients undergoing SCT at our institute between 2006 and 2012. Eighty-one subjects received CD34+ selected myeloablative SCT, 12 umbilical cord blood transplants, and 41 T-replete non-myeloablative SCT. One hundred nineteen patients (89%) were at risk for CMV because either the donor or recipient was seropositive. Of these, 90 patients (75.6%) reactivated CMV at a median of 30 (range 8-105) days after transplantation and received antivirals.

RESULTS

There was no difference in standard transplantation risk factors between the two groups. In multivariate modeling, CMV reactivation >250 copies/mL (odds ratio = 3, P < 0.048), total duration of inpatient IV antiviral therapy (odds ratio = 1.04, P < 0.001), type of transplantation (T-deplete vs. T-replete; odds ratio = 4.65, P < 0.017) were found to be significantly associated with increased non-relapse mortality. The treated group incurred an additional cost of antiviral medication and longer hospitalization within the first 6 months after SCT of $58,000 to $74,000 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that to prevent CMV reactivation, treatment should be given within 1 week of SCT. Preventative treatment may improve outcome and have significant cost savings.

Murine cytomegalovirus immediate-early 1 gene expression correlates with increased GVHD after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in recipients reactivating from latent infection

The success of allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is limited by its treatment related complications, mostly graft versus host disease (GVHD) and fungal and viral infections. CMV reactivation after HCT has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality, and a causal relation between GVHD, immunosuppressive therapy and vice versa has been postulated. Using a low GVHD severity murine HCT model, we assessed the role of MCMV reactivation and GVHD development. BALB/c mice were infected with either murine CMV (MCMV) or mock and monitored for 25 weeks to establish latency, followed by sublethal irradiation conditioning and infusion of bone marrow plus splenocytes from either syngeneic (syn) BALB/c or allo B10.D2 donors. Engraftment of allo donor cells was confirmed by PCR for D2Mit265 gene product size. Day+100 mortality and overall GVHD severity in allo MCMV pre-infected recipients was higher than in allo mock controls. Pathologic changes of lung and liver GVHD in immediate-early gene 1 (IE1) positive recipients were significantly increased compared to mock controls, and were only slightly increased in IE1 negative. No significant gut injury was seen in any group. Aggravated lung injury in IE1 positive recipients correlated with higher BAL cell counts both for total cells and for CD4+ T cells when compared with mock controls, and also with protein expression of lung IFN-gamma and liver TNF. No evidence for CMV specific morphologic changes was seen on histopathology in any organ of IE1 positive recipients, suggesting that CMV reactivation is related to increased GVHD severity but does not require active CMV disease, strengthening the concept of a reciprocal relationship between CMV and GVHD.

Risk factors for acute GVHD and survival after hematopoietic cell transplantation

Risk factors for acute GVHD (AGVHD), overall survival, and transplant-related mortality were evaluated in adults receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplants (1999-2005) from HLA-identical sibling donors (SDs; n = 3191) or unrelated donors (URDs; n = 2370) and reported to the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Minneapolis, MN. To understand the impact of transplant regimen on AGVHD risk, 6 treatment categories were evaluated: (1) myeloablative conditioning (MA) with total body irradiation (TBI) + PBSCs, (2) MA + TBI + BM, (3) MA + nonTBI + PBSCs, (4) MA + nonTBI + BM, (5) reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) + PBSCs, and (6) RIC + BM. The cumulative incidences of grades B-D AGVHD were 39% (95% confidence interval [CI], 37%-41%) in the SD cohort and 59% (95% CI, 57%-61%) in the URD cohort. Patients receiving SD transplants with MA + nonTBI + BM and RIC + PBSCs had significantly lower risks of grades B-D AGVHD than patients in other treatment categories. Those receiving URD transplants with MA + TBI + BM, MA + nonTBI + BM, RIC + BM, or RIC + PBSCs had lower risks of grades B-D AGVHD than those in other treatment categories. The 5-year probabilities of survival were 46% (95% CI, 44%-49%) with SD transplants and 33% (95% CI, 31%-35%) with URD transplants. Conditioning intensity, TBI and graft source have a combined effect on risk of AGVHD that must be considered in deciding on a treatment strategy for individual patients.

Cytomegalovirus infection and disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: experience in a center with a high seroprevalence of both CMV and hepatitis B virus

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are important concerns after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). The similarity of hepatitis B virus (HBV) and CMV with regards to their chronic viral persistence and potential reactivation at the time of impaired cellular immunity has raised clinicians' interest in the occurrence and association between them among patients receiving allo-HSCT; however, only limited data have been obtained from a high seroprevalence region of both CMV and HBV. We monitored 117 adult allo-HSCT patients with both CMV polymerase chain reaction and pp65 antigenemia assay weekly until day 100. In 91.8% of our cases, donors and recipients were both CMV seropositive, and 13.7% of the patients were positive for HBV surface antigen. The incidences of CMV infection and disease were 45.3% and 6.8%, respectively. Grade II-IV acute graft-versus-host disease and anti-thymocyte globulin-containing conditioning regimen were associated with an increased risk of CMV infection in a multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 3.02, 95% CI 1.68-5.42, p < 0.001 and hazard ratio 5.29, 95% CI 2.57-10.8, p < 0.001). No survival disadvantage was found in patients who developed CMV infection (p = 0.699) and CMV disease (p = 0.093). No clinically significant HBV reactivation was found, and the underlying HBV infection in donors or recipients before allo-HSCT did not increase the risk of CMV infection and CMV disease and did not influence survival after allo-HSCT.

Blood stream infection (BSI) and acute GVHD after hematopoietic SCT (HSCT) are associated

BSI and acute GVHD (aGVHD) are serious complications of HSCT. We hypothesized that the two events were not independent of one another. We studied (1) associations between BSI and aGVHD; (2) the impact of BSI and/or aGVHD on death within 100 days after HSCT, employing a retrospective cohort analysis. Risk factor analysis was performed using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Of 211 subjects undergoing allogeneic HSCT from 1/00–12/05 (58% of whom underwent reduced intensity transplantation), 82 (39%) developed BSI. In 49 patients (23%), grades (gr) 2–4 aGVHD occurred. Early BSI was independently associated with an increased occurrence of subsequent aGVHD gr 2–4. Cytomegalovirus seropositivity was independently associated with decreased occurrence of aGVHD. Acute GVHD gr 2–4 independently predicted subsequent first BSI. Both BSI and aGVHD gr 2–4 were significant independent predictors of death within 100 days after HSCT. There is a strong, independent association between BSI and aGVHD. Potential explanations include the elaboration of cytokines during BSI favoring the development of aGVHD and/or the immunosuppressive treatment of aGVHD favoring the development of BSI. Future studies should be directed at mechanistic investigations of this association.

Impact of donor CMV status on viral infection and reconstitution of multifunction CMV-specific T cells in CMV-positive transplant recipients

Reconstitution of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific CD8(+) T cells is essential to the control of CMV infection in CMV-positive recipients (R(+)) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT). Six-color flow cytometry was used to assess the functional profile of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells in 62 of 178 R(+) HCT recipients followed virologically for CMV reactivation. R(+) recipients receiving grafts from CMV-negative donors (D(-); D(-)/R(+)) reconstituted fewer multifunctional CD8(+) T cells expressing tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), macrophage inflammatory protein-1beta (MIP-1beta), and CD107 in addition to interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), compared with D(+)/R(+) recipients. Unlike monofunctional CD8(+) T cells secreting IFN-gamma, which were abundantly generated during CMV reactivation in D(-)/R(+) recipients, the relative lack of multifunctional CD8(+) T cells persisted until at least 1 year post-HCT. D(-)/R(+) recipients were more likely to require recurrent and prolonged use of antivirals. These findings were robust to statistical adjustment for pretransplant factors, as well as for posttransplant factors including graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and its treatment by steroids. These analyses suggest that D(+)/R(+) transplants, on average, generate higher levels of multifunctional CMV-specific T cells and require less antiviral therapy compared with D(-)/R(+) HCT recipients. These results highlight the benefit of D(+) donors in improving outcomes of R(+) HCT recipients by reducing the duration and recurrent need of antiviral treatment, aided by increased levels of multifunctional CMV-specific T cells.

How we treat cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic cell transplant recipients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) continues to cause major complications after hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Over the past decade, most centers have adopted preemptive antiviral treatment or prophylaxis strategies to prevent CMV disease. Both strategies are effective but also have shortcomings with presently available drugs. Here, we review aspects of CMV treatment and prevention in HCT recipients, including currently used drugs and diagnostics, ways to optimize preemptive therapy strategies with quantitative polymerase chain reaction assays, the use of prophylaxis, management of CMV disease caused by wild-type or drug-resistant strains, and future strategies.

Patterns of cytomegalovirus reactivation are associated with distinct evolutive profiles of immune reconstitution after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

T cell-mediated immunity is essential for the control of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections in patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Our aims were to identify patterns of CMV-specific immune responses associated with multiple or prolonged reactivations. We analyzed findings in 116 recipients during the course of infection or reactivation and latency. CD8(+) T cell responses were determined weekly, using HLA class I tetramers together with extended phenotypic analyses. Our results confirmed that recipients of allo-HSCT from unrelated donors were more susceptible to multiple reactivations and that the donor's CMV serological status influenced the occurrence of prolonged reactivations. We found that a lack of CMV-specific T cells after the first episode of reactivation was associated with multiple subsequent reactivations. In patients with uncontrolled reactivations, CMV-specific T cells of the late differentiation phenotype CD45RA(+)CD27(-)CD28(-) did not develop. Longitudinal evaluation of CD27 and CD45RA expression within the tetramer-positive subset could help identify patients in whom a protective immune response is developing. Evaluation of CMV-specific immune responses during the first episode of reactivation, together with extended phenotypes, could thus improve immune monitoring, especially in recipients at risk of uncontrolled viral reactivation.

Management of CMV, HHV-6, HHV-7 and Kaposi-sarcoma herpesvirus (HHV-8) infections in patients with hematological malignancies and after SCT

These recommendations were prepared by the European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia following a predefined methodology. Literature searches were made to identify studies pertinent to management of CMV, HHV-6, -7 and -8 infections. For CMV, 76 studies were reviewed: 72 published and 4 presented as abstracts. Twenty-nine of these studies were prospective randomized trials. For the other herpesviruses, HHV-6, -7 and -8, no randomized controlled trial has been performed, although data from some studies with other primary endpoints have been used to assess the management of HHV-6 infection. Works presented only as abstracts were used to a very limited extent. The quality of evidence and level of recommendation were graded according to the Center for Disease Control (CDC) criteria.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: viral status

Viral infections have been important complications in the transplant procedure from the early days of stem-cell transplantation, causing significant morbidity and mortality. It is important for the management of patients to assess the risk for viral infections that might develop after the stem-cell transplantation. This can be exemplified by cytomegalovirus (CMV) and other herpesviruses, but risk assessment is also important for other viral infections. The aim of this review is to describe current knowledge regarding recipient and donor serological status for viral infections.

Predictors for persistent cytomegalovirus reactivation after T-cell-depleted allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) reactivation occurs in up to 60% of CMV-seropositive recipients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The incidence of CMV disease among T-cell-depleted HSCT patients has been reported from 5-15%. The incidence of reactivation refractory to antivirals in this population is not well studied.

METHODS

In this retrospective study we characterized the outcome of CMV reactivation in a cohort of 255 adult and pediatric patients who underwent T-cell-depleted HSCT at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center from September 1999 through August 2004. CMV infection was monitored by the pp65 antigenemia assay (CMV Ag). Persistent reactivation was defined as antigenemia positivity >21 days on antiviral therapy.

RESULTS

Of 118 CMV-seropositive recipients, 69 (58.4%) had reactivated CMV. Twenty of 69 (29%) developed persistent reactivation at first episode of reactivation, and 7 (10%) in subsequent episode. All patients with persistent reactivation received >/=2 antivirals and CMV hyperimmune globulin; 45% received combination antiviral therapy. The median duration of persistent reactivation was 98 days, range 31-256 days. In multivariate analysis, maximum CMV Ag >25 cells/slide was associated with persistent reactivation (odds ratio 16.2%, 95% confidence interval 4-64, P<0.0001). CMV disease occurred in 6/27 (22%) patients with persistent reactivation. Patients with persistent reactivation had lower CD4(+) and CD8(+) lymphocyte counts compared with those with non-persistent reactivation at day +90 post HSCT (P=0.01 and 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent reactivation occurred in 39% of T-cell-depleted HSCT despite treatment with currently available antivirals. Maximum CMV Ag >25 cells/slide was associated with persistent CMV reactivation. More effective treatment modalities are needed for this high-risk population to reduce CMV-associated morbidity and mortality.

Allogeneic marrow stem-cell transplantation from human leukocyte antigen-identical siblings versus human leukocyte antigen-allelic-matched unrelated donors (10/10) in patients with standard-risk hematologic malignancy: a prospective study from the French Society of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cell Therapy

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of donor type (human leukocyte antigen [HLA] -identical sibling donor versus HLA-A-, HLA-B-, HLA-Cw-, HLA-DRB1-, and HLA-DQB1-identical unrelated donors, or so-called 10/10) on the outcome of patients who underwent allogeneic stem-cell transplantation (alloSCT), adjusting for other prognostic factors, in patients with standard-risk hematologic malignancy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between March 2000 and January 2003, we prospectively investigated the outcome of 236 consecutive patients with standard-risk malignancy from 12 French centers. Fifty-five patients underwent alloSCT from an unrelated HLA-identical donor at the allelic level, whereas 181 patients received an alloSCT from an HLA-identical sibling. Diagnoses included acute leukemia (n = 175), chronic myeloid leukemia (n = 43), and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS; n = 18). All patients received unmodified marrow graft following myeloablative conditioning with cyclophosphamide and total-body irradiation. Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis consisted of cyclosporine and short-course methotrexate in all patients.

RESULTS

In multivariable analysis, overall survival and transplantation-related mortality were adversely influenced by recipient cytomegalovirus (CMV) -positive serology, age of donor older than 37 years, and the occurrence of acute grade > or = II GVHD. Event-free survival rates were lower for patients with recipient CMV-positive serology. Acute grades II to IV GVHD rates were higher for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). No factor was found to influence either relapse or acute grades III to IV GVHD. The effect of donor type was nonsignificant for all criteria.

CONCLUSION

In patients with standard-risk malignancy, transplantation from unrelated HLA-allellically matched donors led to outcomes similar to those from HLA-identical sibling donors.

Hemolytic uremic syndrome after bone marrow transplantation: clinical characteristics and outcome in children

Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is an uncommon but potentially life-threatening complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We retrospectively studied the medical records of 293 children who underwent allogeneic bone marrow transplantation at St. Jude Children's Research Hospital between 1992 and 1999 to describe the clinical course of and to identify risk factors for transplant-associated HUS. Conditioning regimens included cyclophosphamide, cytarabine, and total body irradiation for patients with hematologic malignancies (n = 244); patients with nonmalignant diseases (n = 49) received disease-specific regimens. Grafts from unrelated or mismatched related donors were depleted of T lymphocytes, whereas matched sibling grafts were unmanipulated. All patients received cyclosporine as prophylaxis for graft-versus-host disease. Recipients of grafts from matched siblings also received pentoxifylline or short-course methotrexate. HUS developed in 28 (9.6%) patients at a median of 171 days after transplantation. We identified older donor age (P = .029), use of antithymocyte globulin in the conditioning regimen (P = .008), and recipient CMV seronegativity (P = .011) as being associated with an increased risk of HUS. With a multiple regression analysis, the use of antithymocyte globulin (beta = .86; P = .04) and recipient cytomegalovirus seronegativity (beta = .93; P = .035) remained significant risk factors for the development of HUS.

Biology and management of relapsed acute myeloid leukaemia

Disease relapse remains the major cause of treatment failure in adults with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). This reflects both the failure of current salvage regimens and the absence of effective strategies to secure long-term disease-free survival in those patients who achieve a second remission. Recent progress in understanding the pathogenesis of relapsed disease has enabled the identification of a variety of dysregulated molecular pathways and these now provide a rational basis for the design of novel targeted therapies. At the same time, advances in allogeneic stem-cell transplantation have permitted the extension of the curative potential of allografting to patients in whom it was previously contraindicated. As a result, a range of novel drug and transplant therapies has become available in patients with relapsed AML, and it is realistic to anticipate that a co-ordinated assessment of their clinical and biological impact will provide the basis for the design of future, more effective treatments in relapsed disease.

Recomendaciones GESITRA-SEIMC y RESITRA sobre prevención y tratamiento de la infección por citomegalovirus en pacientes trasplantados

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains an important complication of transplantation. The last decade has been characterized by improvements to management that has reduced its morbidity and mortality. The advance has been particularly important in the diagnosis and prevention. Several techniques have been developed that allow the increasingly rapid and sensitive diagnosis. The different preventive strategies include use of appropriate blood products, immune globulin, and antiviral agents either as prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy. The development of effective oral drugs as valganciclovir also represents a new advance. It is necessary to summarize these advances to facilitate the development of local policies reflecting recent changes. The Group of Study of Infections in Transplantation (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) has therefore produced actual recommendations in the management of CMV infection after transplantation.

Active Epstein-Barr virus infection after allogeneic stem cell transplantation: re-infection or reactivation?

Recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) often show active Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection, which may progress to EBV-associated lymphoproliferative disorders. It is not known whether these EBV infections are true reactivations of the endogenous EBV strain or re-infections with an exogenous EBV strain. Fifty-three recipients of matched related or matched unrelated donor grafts were studied. EBV monitoring was based on a realtime TaqMan EBV DNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay in plasma. In 17 patients, EBV DNA PCR monitoring was performed in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) as well. Mouth washings (MWs) were collected pre-transplant from all patients and family donors. Both pre-transplant EBV DNA from MWs and post-transplant EBV DNA from plasma or PBMCs were successfully obtained in 6 patients. A nested PCR targeting the EBV latent membrane protein-1 C-terminus gene was used to determine sequence variations enabling EBV strain typing. In 3 of 6 patients, the post-transplant EBV sequence pattern differed from the pre-transplant pattern, indicating a re-infection post-transplant with an exogenous strain instead of a reactivation of the original endogenous EBV strain. In the other 3 patients, the endogenous strain was identified. Active EBV infection resulting from re-infection was more severe compared with active EBV infection because of reactivation. In conclusion, active EBV infections after allogeneic SCT frequently result from re-infection with an exogenous EBV strain instead of a true reactivation of the endogenous strain and are potentially more severe.

Dose Study of Thymoglobulin During Conditioning for Unrelated Donor Allogeneic Stem-Cell Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Steroid-related bone loss is a recognized complication after renal transplantation. In a prospective, randomized, multicenter study we compared the influence of a steroid-free immunosuppressive regimen with a regimen with limited steroid exposure on the changes in bone mass after renal transplantation.

METHODS

A total of 364 recipients of a renal transplant were randomized to receive either daclizumab (1 mg/kg on days 0 and 10 after transplantation; steroid-free group n=186) or prednisone (0.3 mg/kg per day tapered to 0 mg at week 16 after transplantation; steroids group n=178). All patients received tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and, during the first 3 days, 100 mg prednisolone intravenously. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) were evaluated in 135 and 126 patients in the steroid-free and steroids group, respectively.

RESULTS

The mean (+/- SD) BMD of the lumbar spine decreased slightly in both groups during the first 3 months after transplantation (steroid-free -1.3 +/- 4.0% [P<0.01]; steroids -2.3 +/-4.2% [P<0.01]). In the following months, lumbar BMD recovered in both groups (P<0.01), resulting in a lumbar BMD at 12 months after transplantation comparable with the baseline value. No difference between the groups was found at 3 months (steroid-free versus steroids +1.0%; 95% confidence interval -0.0%-+2.0%, P=0.060) and at 12 months after transplantation (steroid-free versus steroids +0.9%; 95% confidence interval -0.8%-+2.6%, NS).

CONCLUSION

The use of a moderate dose of steroids during 4 months after transplantation has no important influence on bone mass during the first year after renal transplantation. On average, both regimens prevented accelerated bone loss.

Recent advances in the prevention of CMV infection and disease after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains an important pathogen in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients in the current era of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy, despite the almost complete elimination of CMV disease during the first 3 months after transplantation. Pretransplant CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for poor post-transplant outcome, especially in highly immunodeficient patients (e.g. recipients of ex vivo or in vivo T-cell depletion). Prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations, and indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV (e.g. invasive bacterial and fungal infections) appear to contribute to the poor outcome. The risk of developing antiviral resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (e.g. after transplantation from a haploidentical donor) the incidence may be as high as 8%. Transfusion-transmitted CMV infection can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1-2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy is effective in preventing transfusion-related CMV disease. The development of new drugs and immunologic strategies (adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T-cells and donor/recipient vaccination strategies) are important goals for the elimination of the negative impact of CMV in the HCT setting.

Cytomegalovirus infection after bone marrow transplantation in children

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a well-known cause of disease occurring after bone marrow transplantation (BMT). The manifestations of CMV range from asymptomatic infection, defined as active CMV replication in the blood in the absence of clinical manifestations or organ failure abnormalities, to CMV disease, characterized by CMV infection with clinical symptoms or organ function abnormalities. Diagnostic procedures to assess the viral load have improved greatly with the increased use of antigenemia, CMV DNA, and immediate early-messenger RNA. Many conditions concur in determining the risk of developing CMV reactivation or disease after bone marrow transplant with serologic status of donor and recipient, type of bone marrow transplant, presence of graft-versus-host disease being the most studied. However, time and quality of immune reconstitution seems to be the pivotal factors. Pneumonia and gastrointestinal involvement are the most frequently documented clinical pictures with late-onset CMV reactivation or disease representing a new challenge. CMV prophylaxis or pre-emptive therapy adopted during the last few years in allogeneic BMT recipients has changed the natural history of the disease, reducing the risk of CMV disease, CMV-associated death, transplant-related mortality, and has prolonged the period at risk. Specific studies on children are lacking, however, the clinical pictures and features seems to be similar both in children and adults.

The impact of cytomegalovirus serostatus of donor and recipient before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the era of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy

In the current era of effective prophylactic and preemptive therapy, cytomegalovirus (CMV) is now a rare cause of early mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). However, the ultimate goal of completely eliminating the impact of CMV on survival remains elusive. Although the direct effects of CMV (ie, CMV pneumonia) have been largely eliminated, several recent cohort studies show that CMV-seropositive transplant recipients and seronegative recipients of a positive graft appear to have a persistent mortality disadvantage when compared with seronegative recipients with a seronegative donor. Recipients of T-cell–depleted allografts and/or transplants from unrelated or HLA-mismatched donors seem to be predominantly affected. Reasons likely include both incomplete prevention of direct and indirect or immunomodulatory effects of CMV as well as consequences of drug toxicities. The effect of donor CMV serostatus on outcome remains controversial. Large multicenter cohort studies are needed to better define the subgroups of seropositive patients that may benefit from intensified prevention strategies and to define the impact of CMV donor serostatus in the era of high-resolution HLA matching. Prevention strategies may require targeting both the direct and indirect effects of CMV infection by immunologic or antiviral drug strategies.

Antithymocyteglobulin as prophylaxis of graft failure and graft-versus-host disease in recipients of partially T-cell-depleted grafts from matched unrelated donors: a dose-finding study

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we set out to evaluate the effect of three different antithymocyteglobulin (ATG) doses on graft failure and incidence of graft-vs-host disease (GVHD) among recipients of partially T-cell-depleted (TCD) grafts from matched unrelated donors (MUDs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 74 consecutively treated MUD recipients were analyzed. Fifty-two, 13, and 9 MUD patients were treated with ATG in a total dose of 8 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg (given from days -8 until -4), respectively.

RESULTS

Granulocyte and platelet engraftment were not different between the groups, while graft failure was observed in two patients only (receiving 8 mg/kg and 4 mg/kg ATG, respectively). The cumulative incidence of severe (grade III-IV) acute GVHD and extensive chronic GVHD was 4%, 0%, 44% and 11%, 8%, 44% in groups receiving ATG in a dose of 8 mg/kg, 6 mg/kg, and 4 mg/kg, respectively (severe acute GVHD: p<0.001; extensive chronic GVHD: p=0.05).

CONCLUSION

Based on these findings, we recommend when ATG is used in the setting of stem cell transplantation with (partially) TCD grafts from MUDs, to give a total dose of 6 to 8 mg/kg. A further decrease in dosage resulted in a highly significant increased incidence of severe acute and extensive chronic GVHD.

Prevention of cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants

The main risk factors for cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in recipients of allogeneic stem cell transplants (SCT) are recipient CMV seropositivity and acute graft-versus-host disease. Currently, two antiviral strategies, prophylactic or preemptive antiviral treatment, are used for prevention of CMV disease. Preemptive treatment is most favorable when short-term (14-day) treatment is applied. Several methods are available for monitoring of CMV reactivation. PCR-based CMV DNA detection assays are the most sensitive methods; however, the clinical benefit of this high sensitivity is unclear. Even more, there is lack of clarity whether PCR tests can better be performed with plasma, whole blood, or peripheral blood leukocyte samples. Recovery of a CMV-specific CD8(+) cytotoxic-T-lymphocyte (CTL) response is necessary for preventing CMV reactivation and disease. Reconstitution of absolute CMV-specific CTL counts to values above 10 x 10(6) to 20 x 10(6) CTLs/liter is associated with protection from CMV disease. In the near future, preemptive therapy might be withheld in patients with CMV reactivation who are shown to have adequate CMV-specific cytotoxic T-cell levels. Antiviral therapy with (val)acyclovir has been studied only as prophylactic treatment for prevention of CMV infection. High-dose oral valacyclovir is more effective than acyclovir when used in addition to preemptive treatment of CMV reactivation with ganciclovir or foscarnet. Three antiviral drugs have been tested for preemptive therapy of CMV reactivation and/or treatment of CMV disease. Although intravenous ganciclovir is considered the drug of choice, foscarnet has similar efficacy and less toxicity, especially hematologic toxicity. Cidofovir has not been tested extensively, but so far the results are disappointing. Oral valganciclovir for preemptive treatment of SCT recipients is currently being studied. In addition to antiviral therapy, adoptive immunotherapy with CMV-specific cytotoxic T cells as prophylactic or preemptive therapy is a very elegant strategy; however, generation of these cells is expensive and time-consuming, and therefore the therapy is not available at every transplantation center. Magnetic selection of CMV-specific CD8(+) T cells from peripheral blood by using HLA class I-peptide tetramers may be very promising, making this strategy more accessible.

Cytomegalovirus in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: current status, known challenges, and future strategies

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is a major cause of morbidity and mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Significant progress has been made in the prevention of CMV disease over the past decade, but prevention of late CMV disease continues to be a challenge in selected high-risk populations. The pretransplantation CMV serostatus of the donor and/or recipient remains an important risk factor for posttransplantation outcome despite the use of antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy; CMV-seropositive recipients of T cell-depleted grafts in particular continue to have a survival disadvantage compared with seronegative recipients with seronegative donors. The risk of developing antiviral drug resistance remains low in most patients; however, in a setting of intense immunosuppression (eg, after transplantation from a haploidentical donor), the incidence may be as high as 8%. Primary CMV infection via blood transfusion can be reduced by the provision of seronegative or leukocyte-depleted blood products; however, a small risk of 1% to 2% of CMV disease remains. Surveillance and preemptive therapy are effective in preventing the sequelae of transfusion-related CMV infection. Indirect immunomodulatory effects of CMV are increasingly recognized in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. Strategies currently being investigated include long-term suppression of CMV with valganciclovir for the prevention of late CMV infection and disease, adoptive transfer of CMV-specific T cells, and donor and recipient vaccination strategies.

Effect of antithymocyte globulin on quantitative immune recovery and graft-versus-host disease after partially T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation: a comparison between recipients of matched related and matched unrelated donor grafts

The effect of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) on quantitative immune recovery and graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after partially T-cell-depleted bone marrow transplantation was analyzed in 59 and 32 recipients of grafts from matched related donors and matched unrelated donors (MUDs), respectively. The conditioning regimen was similar in all patients, except for ATG which was given only to MUD recipients. Thirteen MUD patients were treated with high-dose (20 mg/kg) ATG and 19 with low-dose (8 mg/kg) ATG. During the posttransplant period, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-cell numbers and the incidence of acute and chronic GVHD were significantly lower in MUD recipients compared with matched related donor recipients. MUD recipients treated with high-dose ATG showed the worst T-cell and subsets recovery. These data indicate that ATG, often used as part of conditioning regimens in recipients of T-cell-depleted grafts from MUDs, contributes to the severe and prolonged T-cell deficiency that is typical of these patients. On the other hand, it effectively reduces the incidence and severity of GVHD.

Influence of antithymocyte globulin dose on outcome in cytomegalovirus-seropositive recipients of partially T cell-depleted stem cell grafts from matched-unrelated donors

The adverse impact of positive-recipient Cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus on the outcome of matched-unrelated donor (MUD) grafts has been stressed. We evaluated whether CMV-seropositive MUD recipients transplanted after 1999 still showed inferior outcome compared with CMV-seronegative recipients. Two important changes in transplantation procedure were introduced in 1999: (1) reduction of antithymocyte globulin dose, (2) introduction of sequence-based typing of HLA-DRB1. Thirty-six patients received partial T cell-depleted grafts before 1999, and 44 after 1999. CMV-seropositive patients transplanted before 1999 showed a highly significant inferior outcome compared with seronegative recipients. In contrast, no difference in outcome was observed between the two groups of patients transplanted after 1999.