CD4 cell response to 3 doses of subcutaneous interleukin 2: meta-analysis of 3 Vanguard studies

HIV cure strategies: which ones are appropriate for Africa?

Although combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) has reduced mortality and improved lifespan for people living with HIV, it does not provide a cure. Patients must be on ART for the rest of their lives and contend with side effects, unsustainable costs, and the development of drug resistance. A cure for HIV is, therefore, warranted to avoid the limitations of the current therapy and restore full health. However, this cure is difficult to find due to the persistence of latently infected HIV cellular reservoirs during suppressive ART. Approaches to HIV cure being investigated include boosting the host immune system, genetic approaches to disable co-receptors and the viral genome, purging cells harboring latent HIV with latency-reversing latency agents (LRAs) (shock and kill), intensifying ART as a cure, preventing replication of latent proviruses (block and lock) and boosting T cell turnover to reduce HIV-1 reservoirs (rinse and replace). Since most people living with HIV are in Africa, methods being developed for a cure must be amenable to clinical trials and deployment on the continent. This review discusses the current approaches to HIV cure and comments on their appropriateness for Africa.

The CD4 lymphocyte count and risk of clinical progression

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The CD4 lymphocyte count was identified as a key predictor of risk of AIDS defining diseases almost 20 years ago, early in the HIV epidemic. Several issues concerning its use to predict AIDS have arisen since. These include the difference between short and long-term prediction, the use of CD4 percentage compared with absolute counts, the impact of antiretroviral therapy on the predictive value of the CD4 count, the role relative to other markers such as viral load, the derivation of scores to predict AIDS diseases, the use of CD4 count as a surrogate endpoint, the role of the CD4 count nadir compared with the current value and the differential ability to predict different AIDS diseases.

RECENT FINDINGS

All the above issues have been clarified further and this process has continued through 2004 and 2005. These developments are briefly described in this review.

SUMMARY

The CD4 count remains the strongest short-term predictor of risk of AIDS so far identified in both treated and untreated patients and should continue to be a mainstay of monitoring for both untreated and treated patients.

Immunotherapeutic restoration in HIV-infected individuals

While the development of combined active antiretroviral therapy (cART) has dramatically improved life expectancies and quality of life in HIV-infected individuals, long-term clinical problems, such as metabolic complications, remain important constraints of life-long cART. Complete immune restoration using only cART is normally unattainable even in cases of sufficient plasma viral suppression. The need for immunologic adjuncts that complement cART remains, because while cART alone may result in the complete recovery of peripheral net CD4+ T lymphocytes, it may not affect the reservoir of HIV-infected cells. Here, we review current immunotherapies for HIV infection, with a particular emphasis on recent advances in cytokine therapies, therapeutic immunization, monoclonal antibodies, immune-modulating drugs, nanotechnology-based approaches and radioimmunotherapy.

Role of interleukin-2 in patients with HIV infection

Control of viral replication to below the level of quantification using combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) [cART] has led to a dramatic fall in mortality and morbidity from AIDS. However, despite the success of cART, it has become apparent that many patients do not achieve normalized CD4+ T-cell counts despite virological suppression to below the level of quantification (<50 copies/mL). Increasing data from cohort studies and limited data from clinical trials, such as the SMART study, have shown that higher CD4+ T-cell counts are associated with reductions in morbidity and mortality from both AIDS and serious non-AIDS (SNA) conditions, including cardiovascular disease. Enhancement of immune restoration over and above that achievable with ART alone, using a number of strategies including cytokine therapy, has been of interest for many years. The most studied cytokine in this setting is recombinant interleukin (IL)-2 (rIL-2). The purpose of this review is to describe the current status of rIL-2 as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of HIV-1 infection. The review focuses on the rationale underpinning the exploration of rIL-2 in HIV infection, summarizing the phase II and III findings of rIL-2 as an adjunctive therapy to ART and the phase II studies of rIL-2 as an antiretroviral-sparing agent. The phase II studies demonstrated the potential utility of continuous intravenous IL-2 and subsequently intermittent dosing with subcutaneous rIL-2 as a cytokine that could expand the CD4+ T-cell pool in HIV-1-infected patients without any significant detrimental effect on HIV viral load and with an acceptable adverse-effect profile. These data were utilized in designing the phase II studies of rIL-2 as an ART-sparing agent and, more importantly, the large phase III clinical endpoint studies of rIL-2 in HIV-1-infected adults, ESPRIT and SILCAAT. In the latter, subcutaneous rIL-2 was given intermittently (5 days of twice-daily dosing at 4.5-7.5 million international units per dose every 8 weeks) to HIV-1-infected adults receiving cART using an induction/maintenance strategy. Both studies explored the clinical benefit of intermittent subcutaneous rIL-2 with cART versus cART in HIV-infected adults with CD4+ T-cell counts > or = 300 cells/microL (ESPRIT study) and 50-299 cells/microL (SILCAAT study). Both studies showed that receipt of rIL-2 conferred no clinical benefit despite a significantly higher CD4+ T-cell count in the rIL-2 arms of both studies. Moreover, there was an excess of grade 4 clinical events in ESPRIT rIL-2 recipients. The results of the phase III clinical endpoint studies showed that rIL-2 has no place as a therapeutic agent in the treatment of HIV infection.

IL-2 therapy: potential impact of the CD4 cell count at initiation on clinical efficacy--results from the ANRS CO4 cohort

OBJECTIVES

We investigated why, despite its beneficial effect on the CD4 cell count, IL-2 therapy had no clinical benefit as shown in the ESPRIT and SILCAAT trials. We focused on subgroups of patients defined according to CD4 cell counts at baseline and over time to assess the threshold above which IL-2 therapy was no longer beneficial in a large cohort of HIV-1 infected patients.

METHODS

Within the French Hospital Database on HIV, a total of 953 IL-2-treated patients were compared with 27 750 IL-2-untreated patients, matched for the date of enrolment, sex, age, and the baseline CD4 cell count and plasma HIV-1 RNA level. The risk of clinical progression, defined as the occurrence of a new AIDS-defining event or death, was studied with multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Poisson regression models.

RESULTS

We found no clinical benefit in patients starting IL-2 with CD4 count ≥200 cells/mm(3) [hazard ratio (HR) =1.13; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.81-1.57], while a benefit was observed in patients with CD4 count <200 cells/mm(3) (HR=0.64; 95% CI, 0.48-0.86). The observed benefit was due to the risk reduction in the 100-350/mm(3) stratum of updated CD4 cell counts (relative rate=0.30; 95% CI, 0.09-1.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher CD4 cell counts at enrolment and shorter follow-up with low to intermediate CD4 cell counts may explain why IL-2 therapy had no observed clinical benefit in the SILCAAT study. Our findings suggest that the benefit of IL-2 is restricted to a narrow range of CD4 cell counts, arguing against the use of IL-2 in HIV infection to reduce the risk of clinical events.

Changes in the levels of some acute-phase proteins in human immunodeficiency virus-1 infected patients, following interleukin-2 treatment

Intermittent interleukin (IL)-2 administration to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 infected patients is well documented and generally used, but there is limited information about the changes of acute-phase protein (APP) levels in response to this treatment. Fifteen patients undergoing highly active anti-retroviral therapy (HAART) treatment, with undetectable viral load, but low CD4+ cell count (<300/microl), have been treated with 3.6 M IU Proleukine administered twice daily by subcutaneous injection over 5 days. C-reactive protein (CRP), D-dimer, C3, C9, C1-inh and alpha-2HS glycoprotein levels were measured immediately before IL-2 administration, as well as on day 5 and 2-3 weeks thereafter. After IL-2 administration, both mean D-dimer and CRP levels increased significantly (P<0.001), but returned (P<0.001) to baseline within the subsequent 2-3 weeks. Alpha-2HS glycoprotein decreased immediately after IL-2 administration. No significant differences were detected in the levels of C3, C9 and C1-inh. A significant, positive correlation (r=0.5178, P=0.0008) was ascertained between the changes of CRP level, measured immediately before as well as 5 days after IL-2 administration, and changes in CD4 T cell counts measured 2-3 weeks before and after treatment, respectively. IL-2 administration induces rapid elevation of two major APPs (CRP, D-dimer). The positive correlation observed between the changes of CRP levels and CD4+ cell counts after IL-2 administration may indicate that the abrupt, but transitory overproduction of CRP might contribute to the CD4+ cell count-increasing effect of the drug and/ or may be associated with serious side effects.

Effects of intermittent IL-2 alone or with peri-cycle antiretroviral therapy in early HIV infection: the STALWART study

Background

The Study of Aldesleukin with and without antiretroviral therapy (STALWART) evaluated whether intermittent interleukin-2 (IL-2) alone or with antiretroviral therapy (ART) around IL-2 cycles increased CD4⁺ counts compared to no therapy.

Methodology

Participants not on continuous ART with ≥300 CD4⁺ cells/mm³ were randomized to: no treatment; IL-2 for 5 consecutive days every 8 weeks for 3 cycles; or the same IL-2 regimen with 10 days of ART administered around each IL-2 cycle. CD4⁺ counts, HIV RNA, and HIV progression events were collected monthly.

Principal Findings

A total of 267 participants were randomized. At week 32, the mean CD4⁺ count was 134 cells greater in the IL-2 alone group (p<0.001), and 133 cells greater in the IL-2 plus ART group (p<0.001) compared to the no therapy group. Twelve participants in the IL-2 groups compared to 1 participant in the group assigned to no therapy experienced an opportunistic event or died (HR 5.84, CI: 0.59 to 43.57; p = 0.009).

Conclusions

IL-2 alone or with peri-cycle HAART increases CD4⁺ counts but was associated with a greater number of opportunistic events or deaths compared to no therapy. These results call into question the immunoprotective significance of IL-2-induced CD4⁺ cells.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00110812

Interleukin-2 therapy in patients with HIV infection

BACKGROUND

Used in combination with antiretroviral therapy, subcutaneous recombinant interleukin-2 raises CD4+ cell counts more than does antiretroviral therapy alone. The clinical implication of these increases is not known.

METHODS

We conducted two trials: the Subcutaneous Recombinant, Human Interleukin-2 in HIV-Infected Patients with Low CD4+ Counts under Active Antiretroviral Therapy (SILCAAT) study and the Evaluation of Subcutaneous Proleukin in a Randomized International Trial (ESPRIT). In each, patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) who had CD4+ cell counts of either 50 to 299 per cubic millimeter (SILCAAT) or 300 or more per cubic millimeter (ESPRIT) were randomly assigned to receive interleukin-2 plus antiretroviral therapy or antiretroviral therapy alone. The interleukin-2 regimen consisted of cycles of 5 consecutive days each, administered at 8-week intervals. The SILCAAT study involved six cycles and a dose of 4.5 million IU of interleukin-2 twice daily; ESPRIT involved three cycles and a dose of 7.5 million IU twice daily. Additional cycles were recommended to maintain the CD4+ cell count above predefined target levels. The primary end point of both studies was opportunistic disease or death from any cause.

RESULTS

In the SILCAAT study, 1695 patients (849 receiving interleukin-2 plus antiretroviral therapy and 846 receiving antiretroviral therapy alone) who had a median CD4+ cell count of 202 cells per cubic millimeter were enrolled; in ESPRIT, 4111 patients (2071 receiving interleukin-2 plus antiretroviral therapy and 2040 receiving antiretroviral therapy alone) who had a median CD4+ cell count of 457 cells per cubic millimeter were enrolled. Over a median follow-up period of 7 to 8 years, the CD4+ cell count was higher in the interleukin-2 group than in the group receiving antiretroviral therapy alone--by 53 and 159 cells per cubic millimeter, on average, in the SILCAAT study and ESPRIT, respectively. Hazard ratios for opportunistic disease or death from any cause with interleukin-2 plus antiretroviral therapy (vs. antiretroviral therapy alone) were 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70 to 1.18; P=0.47) in the SILCAAT study and 0.94 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.16; P=0.55) in ESPRIT. The hazard ratios for death from any cause and for grade 4 clinical events were 1.06 (P=0.73) and 1.10 (P=0.35), respectively, in the SILCAAT study and 0.90 (P=0.42) and 1.23 (P=0.003), respectively, in ESPRIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a substantial and sustained increase in the CD4+ cell count, as compared with antiretroviral therapy alone, interleukin-2 plus antiretroviral therapy yielded no clinical benefit in either study. (ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00004978 [ESPRIT] and NCT00013611 [SILCAAT study].)

Interleukin-2 cycling causes transient increases in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and D-dimer that are not associated with plasma HIV-RNA levels

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of interleukin (IL)-2 treatment on inflammatory and thrombotic biomarkers in chronically HIV-infected adults receiving antiretroviral therapy.

METHODS

Cryopreserved plasma was evaluated retrospectively for C-reactive protein (CRP) and D-dimer at baseline, end of an IL-2 cycle, and long-term follow up from two randomized, controlled trials: 57 IL-2-naive adults receiving either three to six cycles of IL-2 as well as antiretroviral therapy (nucleoside analogues) or antiretroviral therapy alone for 12 months, and 40 IL-2-experienced adults on highly active antiretroviral therapy who either interrupted or continued therapy for 6 months after a baseline IL-2 cycle. High-sensitivity CRP (hsCRP) was measured by immunonephelometry (detection limit 0.175 mg/l) and D-dimer by latex agglutination (detection limit 0.20 mg/l). Median within-group differences and pre and post-IL-2 changes between groups were assessed via nonparametric Wilcoxon signed-rank and Mann-Whitney U-tests. Spearman's rank test was used to assess correlations between changes in hsCRP, D-dimer, and HIV-RNA viral load.

RESULTS

Significant increases in hsCRP (study 1: 138.6 mg/l; study 2: 58.9 mg/l) and D-dimer (study 1: 3.1 mg/l; study 2: 0.4 mg/l, all P < 0.0001) occurred by the end of the initial IL-2 cycle, returning to baseline by the end of study. No correlations were seen between changes in hsCRP or D-dimer and HIV-RNA, CD4 T-cell count, or proliferation (Ki67 expression). No thrombotic or cardiovascular serious adverse events occurred during these study periods.

CONCLUSION

IL-2 dosing caused transient increases in plasma hsCRP and D-dimer levels, regardless of HIV-RNA viral load, suggesting the possibility of increased risk for thrombotic events.

Benefits and burdens of participation in a longitudinal clinical trial

SYSTEMATIC DATA ON THE IMPACT THAT longitudinal clinical trials have on patient participants are needed to ensure that all the risks and potential benefits of participating in clinical research are properly evaluated and disclosed. Recognizing the lack of systematic data on this topic, we surveyed 582 individuals from Argentina, Brazil, and Thailand who were participating in the ESPRIT study, a Phase III randomized trial of interleukin-2 in HIV disease. Respondents were asked about the benefits and burdens of participating in ESPRIT using a self-administered survey. We found that 91% of respondents in the IL-2 treatment arm and 79% in the no IL-2 control arm reported medical benefits from their participation. In addition, 68% in the IL-2 treatment arm and 60% of the no IL-2 controls reported non-medical benefits. Thirteen percent of the IL-2 respondents and 5% of the non-IL2 respondents reported problems with their jobs due to study participation. Given that respondents, including those in the control arm, reported medical and non-medical benefits and burdens from their research participation, investigators and review committees should be aware of and respond to the potential for research participants to experience benefits and burdens that are unrelated to the intervention being tested.

Immunotherapies in HIV-1 infection

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to describe the current status of immunotherapies for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. This review is timely, as the results of the phase III clinical trials of recombinant interleukin-2 (rIL-2) as adjuncts to combination antiretroviral therapy are about to be released.

RECENT FINDINGS

For many years, the use of rIL-2 in HIV-infected individuals has been explored. Although the results of the clinical endpoint studies of rIL-2 are awaited, there are now further data for rIL-2 as a stand-alone therapy for the treatment of HIV. Maraviroc, a recently approved anti-HIV agent, is a small molecule antagonist of human chemokine receptor-5. The recent observation that maraviroc-treated patients achieved higher CD4 and CD8 T-cell counts compared with comparator regimens (without a chemokine receptor-5 antagonist) for equivalent viral load reductions has fueled interest in using these host-directed therapies to enhance immune restoration.

SUMMARY

This review summarizes the most recent clinical data for rIL-2 and reviews other immunotherapies in earlier development including cytokines rIL-7, rIL-15, rIL-21, new therapeutic vaccination approaches including infusion of overlapping HIV peptides and dendritic cell immunotherapy and novel agents including luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues and vitamin D3-binding protein macrophage activating factor.

Inferiority of IL-2 alone versus IL-2 with HAART in maintaining CD4 T cell counts during HAART interruption: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether interleukin (IL)-2 in patients with chronic HIV infection can maintain CD4 T cell counts during 6 months of HAART interruption.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label phase II noninferiority trial comparing IL-2 with HAART interruption or continuous HAART.

METHODS

Forty-one IL-2-experienced (three or more prior cycles) HIV-1-infected adults with CD4 cell count at least 500 cells/microl were randomized in the ratio 2: 1 to interrupted (I = 27) or continuous (C = 14) HAART for 6 months following an initial IL-2 cycle. Subsequent IL-2 cycles were triggered by CD4 T cell counts less than 90% of baseline. Immune, metabolic, and quality of life indices were compared (Mann-Whitney and Fisher's exact tests), defining noninferiority as a percentage difference (C- I) in treatment success (CD4 T cells > or =90% of baseline at 6 months) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) lower limit greater than -20%.

RESULTS

Demographic and immune parameters were similar between the groups at baseline. Median CD4 T cell count, HIV viral load, and treatment success differed significantly at 6 months (I: 866 cells/microl, 39,389 copies/ml, 48.1%; C: 1246 cells/microl, <50 copies/ml, 92.3%; P < or = 0.001). Group I was inferior to C (% difference = -44.2%; 95% CI: -64.2%, -11.2%; P = 0.013). Minor statistically significant differences in HgbA1c and energy level occurred at 6 months (I > C). Following HAART interruption, single cases of acute retroviral syndrome, secondary syphilis, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Kaposi's sarcoma recurrence were observed.

CONCLUSION

IL-2 alone was inferior to IL-2 with HAART in maintaining baseline CD4 T cell counts. HAART interruption had a small impact on metabolic parameters and quality of life.

Long-term clinical and surrogate marker effects of subcutaneous intermittent interleukin-2 without antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected patients

OBJECTIVES

Subcutaneous administration of interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been shown to increase CD4 counts in HIV-infected patients. It remains unclear whether this effect is associated with a clinical benefit.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a long-term follow-up in the cohort of the UK-Vanguard study in which three groups of 12 antiretroviral-naive subjects with CD4 cell counts >350 cells/mm(3) received no treatment or IL-2 at either 4.5 or 7.5 MIU twice daily in 5 day cycles, respectively.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 376 weeks. IL-2 therapy was associated with a higher area under the curve of CD4 cell count change from baseline at week 48 but not thereafter. HIV-RNA levels were unaffected. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was initiated after a mean of 172, 175 and 152 weeks in the control group, low-dose and high-dose IL-2 treatment group, respectively, a statistically non-significant difference. There was a tendency to start HAART soon after discontinuation of IL-2 therapy which may have been triggered by the steep decay of CD4 counts. There were two serious adverse events in the control group, seven in the low-dose IL-2 group and eight in the high-dose IL-2 group. No pattern of disease was detected, making an association with IL-2 therapy unlikely.

CONCLUSIONS

We could detect neither a benefit of IL-2 therapy after week 48 nor delayed initiation of HAART. This is currently the longest follow-up data comparing IL-2 therapy with no therapy in antiretroviral-naive HIV-infected patients and does not show a persistent benefit of the intervention.

Predictors of CD4 count change over 8 months of follow up in HIV-1-infected patients with a CD4 count>or=300 cells/microL who were assigned to 7.5 MIU interleukin-2

BACKGROUND

ESPRIT is a randomized trial comparing the clinical impact of interleukin (IL)-2 plus antiretrovirals vs antiretrovirals alone. Identification of factors that influence the relationship between IL-2 and CD4 count recovery will enable better personalization of treatment with IL-2 in HIV-1-positive individuals. The IL-2 induction phase consists of three dosing cycles over 6-8 months (7.5 MIU twice a day, for 5 days every 8 weeks).

METHODS

We included patients initiating IL-2 at the 7.5 MIU dose with an 8-month CD4 count, measured at least 30 days after their last cycle. We identified baseline predictors of CD4 count changes over 8 months using linear regression.

RESULTS

Of 2090 patients assigned IL-2, 1673 (80%) were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range) baseline CD4 count was 461 (370, 587) cells/microL with a median increase of 233 (90, 411) cells/microL at month 8. After adjustments, significant predictors of CD4 count change included CD4 nadir (29.8 cells/microL greater increase per 100 cells/microL higher; P<0.0001), last CD4 count before baseline (mean 36.0 cells/microL greater increase per 100 cells/microL higher; P<0.0001), time from antiretroviral start to baseline (8.3 cells/microL smaller increase per year longer; P=0.001), age (11.7 cells/microL smaller increase per 5 years older; P=0.005) and race (79.7 cells/microL greater increase for black patients vs white patients; P=0.003). A linear relationship existed between total IL-2 dose in the first cycle and CD4 count change (73.1 cells/microL greater increase per 15 MIU higher; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Prior nadir and current CD4 counts, age and IL-2 dose are major determinants of CD4 increases induced by with intermittent administration of IL-2 in HIV-1-positive individuals on antiretrovirals. The clinical function of these induced CD4 cells is under study.

[Cytokine therapies in HIV infection]

The theoretical objectives of cytokine therapies in HIV infection are to impact T cell homeostasis and/or to improve immune functions or the mobilization of the HIV reservoir. Among cytokines, IL-2 and IL-7 are promising agents under clinical evaluation. Intermittent administration of IL-2 is by far the furthest studied strategy in HIV infection. This cytokine increases CD4 T lymphocytes in HIV-infected individuals. Recent clinical data showed that this effect is sustained over years. IL-2 therapy induces a peripheral expansion of T cells as a consequence of prolonged survival of T cells and decreased immune activation. These effects suggest that a cytokine therapy may interfere with critical factors of HIV disease. Recent data provide arguments that IL-2 therapy improves immune functions in HIV-infected patients. Whether these effects may be translated into clinical benefits is under evaluation in ongoing phase III studies. The potential interest of IL-7 in the treatment of HIV-infection is based on its crucial role on T cell homeostasis both in thymic output and peripheral T proliferation and survival. Although no data in human are still available, recent studies provide arguments to assess this cytokine in HIV infection. Phase I studies are ongoing or planned.

Early gamma interferon and interleukin-2 responses to vaccination predict the late resting memory in malaria-naïve and malaria-exposed individuals

Two different cell populations respond to potent T-cell-inducing vaccinations. The induction and loss of effector cells can be seen using an ex vivo enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay, but the more durable resting memory response is demonstrable by a cultured ELISPOT assay. The relationship of the early effector response to durable resting memory is incompletely understood. Effector phenotype is usually identified by gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) production, but interleukin-2 (IL-2) has been specifically linked to the differentiation of memory cells. Here, IFN-gamma- and IL-2-secreting effector cells were identified by an ex vivo ELISPOT assay 1 week after vaccination and compared with the resting memory responses detected by a cultured ELISPOT assay 3 months later. The different kinetics and induction of IL-2 by different vaccines and natural exposure are described. Furthermore, both early IFN-gamma and IL-2 production independently predicted subsequent memory responses at 3 months in malaria-naïve volunteers, but only IFN-gamma predicted memory in malaria-exposed volunteers. However, dual ELISPOT assays were also performed on malaria-exposed volunteers to identify cells producing both cytokines simultaneously. This demonstrated that double-cytokine-producing cells were highly predictive of memory. This assay may be useful in predicting vaccinations most likely to generate stable, long-term memory responses.

A pilot study evaluating time to CD4 T-cell count <350 cells/mm(3) after treatment interruption following antiretroviral therapy +/- interleukin 2: results of ACTG A5102

BACKGROUND

Although an intermittent antiviral treatment (ART) strategy may limit long-term toxicity and cost, there is concern about the risk for virologic failure, selection of drug resistance mutations, and disease progression. By boosting CD4 T-cell counts, interleukin 2 (IL-2) could safely prolong the duration of treatment interruption (TI) in a CD4-driven strategy.

METHODS

The AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG) study A5102 evaluated 3 cycles of IL-2 before TI, on clinical and immunologic outcomes, using a CD4 T-cell count of <350 cells/mm as the threshold for restarting ART. Forty-seven HIV-infected subjects on potent ART with CD4 T-cell counts of > or =500 cells/mm or more and HIV RNA levels of less than 200 copies/mL were randomized to arm A (ART + three 5-day cycles of IL-2 at 4.5 million U, Sc, BID every 8 weeks, n = 23) or arm B (ART alone, n = 24) for 18 weeks (step 1). At the end of step 1, subjects with a CD4 T-cell count of > or =500 cells/mm or more stopped ART until a CD4 count of <350 cells/mm (step 2). CD4 T-cell count, time to return of viremia, and the emergence of drug resistance mutations after TI were compared between study arms.

RESULTS

IL-2 recipients maintained higher CD4 counts during TI for 48 weeks with a waning of the CD4 effect by 72 weeks. A sustained CD4 T-cell count of more than 350 cells/mm and more durable TI were associated with a higher nadir CD4 T-cell count before ART and higher naive CD4 T-cell count at entry. After TI, a higher viral set point and drug resistance mutations at virologic rebound were associated with a shorter time to CD4 T-cell count of less than 350 cell/mm. There were no differences in the magnitude of virologic rebound (at week 8 of step 2, median log10 HIV RNA level was 4.23 for arm A and 4.21 for arm B) or the steady-state HIV-1 RNA level after week 8.

CONCLUSIONS

IL-2 before TI did not prolong time to CD4 of less than 350 cells/mm. A TI strategy utilizing a CD4 T-cell threshold of less than 350 cells/mm for restarting ART appears generally safe with most subjects in both arms remaining off ART for more than 1 year. Implications of our results for TI strategies include the potential advantage of starting ART at higher CD4 T-cell levels while avoiding any drug resistance and evaluating immunomodulators or drugs to reduce T-cell activation and HIV-1 RNA rebound during the TI.

Immunomodulants for the treatment of HIV infection: the search goes on

The natural history of HIV infection has been greatly modified by the introduction of powerful antiretroviral agents that act on multiple steps of HIV replication. Thus, antiretroviral therapy (ART) has prolonged the life of HIV-infected individuals, significantly impacting on the progression to AIDS. It was assumed that ART-induced suppression of HIV would have resulted in a degree of immune recovery sufficient enough to allow immune control over HIV replication independently of the use of drugs. Unfortunately, interruption of therapy, even after long periods of full suppression of viral replication, is almost inevitably associated with a prompt rebound of HIV viraemia. The outcome of this observation is that ART has to be considered as a lifelong therapy, with the associated resulting problems of the emergence of multi-drug resistant viral strains, toxic effects, costs and compliance. The use of immunomodulants in association with ART could achieve the goal of boosting the immune response to a threshold, permitting the immune response to indefinitely suppress HIV replication.