Resistance to dual nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors in children infected with HIV clade A/E

High Rate Multiple Drug Resistances in HIV-Infected Patients Failing Nonnucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Regimens in Thailand, Where Subtype A/E is Predominant

The prevalence of drug resistance was determined among 64 HIV-infected Thai patients who were failed while receiving nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)–based regimens. Eighty-nine percent of patients had 1 or more NNRTI mutation resistances. Almost all patients had resistance to at least 1 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI), and 42% had multiple-NRTI resistance.

Country of birth does not influence long-term clinical, virologic, and immunological outcome of HIV-infected children living in the Netherlands: a cohort study comparing children born in the Netherlands with children born in Sub-Saharan Africa

BACKGROUND

Immigrant HIV-infected adults in industrialized countries show a poorer clinical and virologic outcome compared with native patients. We aimed to investigate potential differences in clinical, immunological, and virologic outcome in Dutch HIV-infected children born in the Netherlands (NL) versus born in Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) in a national cohort analysis.

METHODS

We included all HIV-infected children registered between 1996 and 2013. Descriptive statistics, mixed-effects models, and Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate differences between groups.

RESULTS

In total, 319 HIV-infected children were registered. The majority of these children were born in SSA (n = 148, 47%) or NL (n = 113, 36%) and most were black (n = 158, 61%). Children born in NL were diagnosed at a median age of 1.2 years and initiated combination antiretroviral therapy (cART) at a median age of 2.6 years, compared with 3.7 and 5.3 years, respectively, for children born in SSA (HIV diagnosis: P < 0.001; cART initiation: P < 0.001). Despite a lower initial CD4 T-cell Z-score in children born in SSA, their immunological reconstitution was similar to children from NL. Virologic suppression was achieved in the majority of all cART-treated children (NL: 96%, SSA: 94%). There was no difference in the occurrence or timing of virologic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Most immigrant HIV-infected children living in NL were born in SSA. Children born in SSA were diagnosed and initiated cART at an older age than children born in NL. Despite initial differences in CD4 T-cell counts and HIV viral load, the long-term immunological and virologic response to cART was similar in both groups.

Drug resistance in the HIV-1-infected paediatric population worldwide: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Drug resistance monitoring of the paediatric HIV-1-infected population is required to optimize treatment success and preserve future treatment options.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the current knowledge of HIV drug resistance (HIVDR) in naive and pretreated HIV-1-infected paediatric populations across diverse settings and sampling time periods.

METHODS

PubMed database screened until May 2013. We selected publications including data on transmitted (TDR) and acquired drug resistance mutation (DRM) rates and/or pol sequences for HIVDR testing in paediatric patients. We recorded the children's country, age, study period, number of children with pol sequences, presence or absence of antiretroviral treatment (ART) at sampling time, viral region sequenced, HIVDR rate to the three main drug classes (single, double or triple), the considered resistance mutation list and performed assay, specimen type, HIV-1 variants and subtyping methodology when available.

RESULTS

Forty-one selected studies showed HIVDR data from 2538 paediatric HIV-1-infected patients (558 naive and 1980 pretreated) from 30 countries in Africa (11), Asia (6), America (10) and Europe (3). Both TDR and DRM prevalence were reported in 9 studies, only TDR in 6 and only DRM in 26. HIVDR prevalence varied across countries and periods. Most studies used in-house resistance assays using plasma or infected cells. HIV-1 non-B variants were prevalent in 18 paediatric cohorts of the 24 countries with reported subtypes. Only five countries (Uganda, Spain, the UK, Brazil and Thailand) presented resistance data in ≥200 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic and periodic studies among infected children are crucial to design a more suitable first- or second-line therapy.

Synthesis and anti-HIV properties of new carbamate prodrugs of AZT

A series of new 5'-O-carbamate prodrugs of AZT have been prepared. The stability in biological media, anti-HIV properties and pharmacokinetic parameters in dogs were evaluated. The compounds display moderate anti-HIV activity in cell culture. After oral administration of carbamate IV in dogs, both intact prodrug IV and released AZT were discovered in dog blood. Pharmacokinetic parameters of the compound IV were estimated. Half-life (T(1/2)) of AZT released after oral administration of IV in dogs was close to that after administration of AZT itself, and time to the maximum concentration (T(max)) of AZT released from IV was two and three times longer compared with that of AZT and H-phosphonate AZT, respectively. Acute toxicity was more than five times less if compared with AZT. As a result, we consider this series of carbamate derivatives of AZT as perspective for development of anti-HIV agents.

Etravirine and rilpivirine resistance in HIV-1 subtype CRF01_AE-infected adults failing non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-based regimens

BACKGROUND

We studied prevalence of etravirine (ETR) and rilpivirine (RPV) resistance in HIV-1 subtype CRF01_AE infection with first-line non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) failure.

METHODS

A total of 225 adults failing two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) plus 1 NNRTI in Thailand with HIV RNA>1,000 copies/ml were included. Genotypic resistance results and HIV-1 subtype were interpreted by Stanford DR database. ETR resistance was calculated by the new Monogram weighted score (Monogram WS; ≥ 4 indicating high-level ETR resistance) and by DUET weighted score (DUET WS; 2.5-3.5 and ≥ 4 resulted in intermediate and reduce ETR response, respectively). RPV resistance interpretation was based on previous reports.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) age was 38 (34-42) years, 41% were female and CDC A:B:C were 22%:21%:57%. HIV subtypes were 96% CRF01_AE and 4% B. Antiretrovirals at failure were lamivudine (100%), stavudine (93%), nevirapine (90%) and efavirenz (10%) with a median (IQR) duration of 3.4 (1.8-4.5) years. Median (IQR) CD4(+) T-cell count and HIV RNA were 194 (121-280) cells/mm³ and 4.1 (3.6-4.6) log₁₀ copies/ml, respectively. The common NNRTI mutations were Y181C (41%), G190A (22%) and K103N (19%). The proportion of patients with Monogram WS score ≥ 4 was 61.3%. By DUET WS, 49.8% and 7.5% of patients were scored 2.5-3.5 and ≥4, respectively. Only HIV RNA ≥ 4 log₁₀ copies/ml at failure was associated with both Monogram WS ≥ 4 (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.3-3.9; P=0.003) and DUET WS ≥ 2.5 (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.3; P=0.02). The RVP resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) detected were K101P (1.8%), Y181I (2.7%) and Y181V (3.6%). All patients with RPV mutation had ETR resistance. No E138R/E138K mutations were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Approximately 60% of patients had high-level ETR resistance. The role of ETR in second-line therapy is limited in late NNRTI failure settings. RVP RAMs were uncommon, but cross-resistance between ETR and RVP was high.

Differences in resistance mutations among HIV-1 non-subtype B infections: a systematic review of evidence (1996-2008)

Ninety percent of HIV-1-infected people worldwide harbour non-subtype B variants of HIV-1. Yet knowledge of resistance mutations in non-B HIV-1 and their clinical relevance is limited. Although a few reviews, editorials and perspectives have been published alluding to this lack of data among non-B subtypes, no systematic review has been performed to date.With this in mind, we conducted a systematic review (1996-2008) of all published studies performed on the basis of non-subtype B HIV-1 infections treated with antiretroviral drugs that reported genotype resistance tests. Using an established search string, 50 studies were deemed relevant for this review.These studies reported genotyping data from non-B HIV-1 infections that had been treated with either reverse transcriptase inhibitors or protease inhibitors. While most major resistance mutations in subtype B were also found in non-B subtypes, a few novel mutations in non-B subtypes were recognized. The main differences are reflected in the discoveries that: (i) the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor resistance mutation, V106M, has been seen in subtype C and CRF01_AE, but not in subtype B, (ii) the protease inhibitor mutations L89I/V have been reported in C, F and G subtypes, but not in B, (iii) a nelfinavir selected non-D30N containing pathway predominated in CRF01_AE and CRF02_AG, while the emergence of D30N is favoured in subtypes B and D, (iv) studies on thymidine analog-treated subtype C infections from South Africa, Botswana and Malawi have reported a higher frequency of the K65R resistance mutation than that typically seen with subtype B.Additionally, some substitutions that seem to impact non-B viruses differentially are: reverse transcriptase mutations G196E, A98G/S, and V75M; and protease mutations M89I/V and I93L.Polymorphisms that were common in non-B subtypes and that may contribute to resistance tended to persist or become more frequent after drug exposure. Some, but not all, are recognized as minor resistance mutations in B subtypes. These observed differences in resistance pathways may impact cross-resistance and the selection of second-line regimens with protease inhibitors. Attention to newer drug combinations, as well as baseline genotyping of non-B isolates, in well-designed longitudinal studies with long duration of follow up are needed.

Safety and efficacy of a double-boosted protease inhibitor combination, saquinavir and lopinavir/ ritonavir, in pretreated children at 96 weeks

Background

This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy, safety and use of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of a double-boosted protease inhibitor (PI) combination, saquinavir (SQV) and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in Thai HIV type-1 (HIV-1)-infected children who had failed on reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

Methods

In total, 50 children from two sites in Thailand were treated with standard dosing of SQV and LPV/r. CD4+ T-cell count and percentage, viral load (VL; HIV-1 RNA), minimum plasma drug concentrations (Cmin) and drug safety laboratory evaluations were monitored. Virological failure was defined as having two consecutive VL measures >400 copies/ml after week 12. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

Results

Baseline data were a median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 7.1–11.2), VL 4.8 log10 copies/ ml (IQR 4.5–5.1) and CD4+ T-cell percentage 7% (IQR 3.0– 9.5). CDC classifications were N=4%, A=14%, B=68% and C=14% of participants. Median CD4+ T-cell percentage and CD4+ T-cell count increase were 14% (IQR 7–19) and 558 cells/mm3 (IQR 308–782), respectively (both P<0.001). Overall, 37 (74%) children achieved VL<50 copies/ml with significant differences between sites (90% versus 63%). Over 96 weeks, 10 patients had virological failure. Total cholesterol and high-density lipoprotein increased significantly over time, whereas the triglycerides and low-density lipoprotein did not. Approximately 50% of participants reported no change in body shape, and 33%, 43% and 39% reported fatter arms, face and abdomen, respectively. LPV and SQV Cmin were high and stable over time.

Conclusions

Double-boosted SQV+LPV/r was an effective and safe alternative for a second-line regimen in children. Hypercholesterolaemia needs close follow-up. On the basis of the TDM results, PI dose reduction in this population should be considered.

Double boosted protease inhibitors, saquinavir, and lopinavir/ritonavir, in nucleoside pretreated children at 48 weeks

OBJECTIVES

To assess the 48-week efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and resistance of double boosted protease inhibitors (PI), saquinavir (SQV), and lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r), in children who have failed nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors /non-nucleoside reverse transcription inhibitors-based regimens.

METHODS

Fifty children at 2 sites in Thailand were treated with standard dosing of SQV and LPV/r. CD4, HIV-RNA viral load (VL), plasma drug concentrations and safety laboratory evaluations were monitored. Virologic failure was defined as having 2 consecutive VL >400 copies/mL after week 12 of therapy. Intention to treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Baseline data were a median age of 9.3 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.1-11.2), Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) classification N:A:B:C 4%:14%:68%:14%, VL 4.8 log10 (IQR: 4.5-5.1), CD4 7% (IQR: 3-9.5). At 48 weeks, 3 had died of bacterial infection but no cases had progressed CDC classification. Median CD4% rise was 9 (IQR: 5-16) and median HIV RNA reduction was -2.8 log10 (IQR: -3.2 to -1.4), both P < 0.001. Thirty-nine (78%) and 32 (64%) children had VL <400 and <50 with significant differences between the 2 sites. Five children (10%) had VL failure as a result of poor adherence to the drug regimen but no one had major PI mutations. Median serum cholesterol and triglyceride increased significantly (+35 mg/dL, +37 mg/dL, respectively, both P < 0.001). Mean minimum plasma concentrations (Cmin) of LPV and SQV were 4.6 and 1.24 mg/L, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Double boosted SQV/LPV/r resulted in significant CD4 rise and VL decline at 48 weeks. Hyperlipidemia was common. Cmin of both PIs exceeded therapeutic concentrations. Poor adherence caused failure in 10%. No major PI mutations were found.

Impact of HIV-1 pol diversity on drug resistance and its clinical implications

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

HIV knowledge is based on subtype B, common in resource-rich settings, whereas globally non-B subtypes predominate. Inter-subtype pol diversity encompasses multiple genotypic differences among HIV variants, the consequence of which is unknown. This review summarizes publications from the past year relevant to the impact of HIV diversity on drug resistance evolution and its potential clinical implications.

RECENT FINDINGS

The benefit of antiretroviral therapy in non-B infected patients is ongoing, though subtype heterogeneity in rates of disease progression is observed. Pol inter-subtype diversity is high, and known subtype B drug resistance mutations occur in non-B subtypes. New mutations and subtype-specific mutation rates are identified, however, unexplained drug susceptibilities are seen, and additional insight is offered on structural pathogenic mechanisms of resistance in non-B subtypes. These differences may affect genotypic interpretation and our ability to apply drug resistance to patient care.

SUMMARY

Current evidence suggests good treatment response and comparable drug resistance evolution in HIV-1 B and non-B infected patients, with increasingly emerging differences. Impact of inter-subtype diversity on drug susceptibility and on evolution of drug resistance should continue to be a major research focus to increase our understanding and ability to improve global patient care.

Absence of Resistance Mutations in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients Treated with Ritonavir-Boosted Saquinavir

Background

There are few data on the selection of resistance by ritonavir-boosted saquinavir (SQV/r), particularly in antiretroviral (ARV)-naive patients.

Objective

To assess the incidence of virological failure and evolution of resistance in ARV-naive individuals receiving SQV/r in the induction phase of the Staccato trial.

Methods

ARV-naive subjects ( n=272) received SQV/r 1,600/100 mg once daily with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for at least 24 weeks. Patients were defined as having virological failure (VF) when there were two consecutive HIV-1 RNA measurements >500 copies/ml after week 12. Viral genotypes (reverse transcriptase [RT] and protease [PRO]) were determined at baseline in all patients and as close as possible to the time of initial failure in patients experiencing VF.

Results

VF was observed in 9/272 patients receiving SQV/r 1,600/100 mg once daily with two NRTIs (3.3%) and occurred 19–48 weeks after treatment initiation. Eight of these patients were evaluable at failure. No major PRO mutations were detected, but 2/8 displayed single new minor PRO substitutions (M36I, L10I) at VF that were known or suspected not to have been present at baseline; both these substitutions exist as natural polymorphisms. A third patient displayed a single new RT mutation (M184I).

Conclusions

SQV/r plus two NRTIs (1,600/100 mg once daily) is an effective initial treatment option for ARV-naive patients, resulting in a low rate of viral rebound (3.3%). Furthermore, no major protease mutations were detected following VF, suggesting that future treatment options are preserved.