Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in geriatric patients: usefulness of screening in a chronic-care setting

Association Between Hand Hygiene Compliance and Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Prevalence in a French Rehabilitation Hospital

We simultaneously investigated the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and compliance with hand hygiene in the clinical wards of a French rehabilitation hospital. We found that the rate of hand hygiene compliance observed at the patient's bedside was a strong predictor of MRSA prevalence.

Universal Screening and Decolonization for Control of MRSA in Nursing Homes: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Study

OBJECTIVE

The risk of carrying methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is higher among nursing home (NH) residents than in the general population. However, control strategies are not clearly defined in this setting. In this study, we compared the impact of standard precautions either alone (control) or combined with screening of residents and decolonization of carriers (intervention) to control MRSA in NHs.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial

SETTING

NHs of the state of Vaud, Switzerland

PARTICIPANTS

Of 157 total NHs in Vaud, 104 (67%) participated in the study.

INTERVENTION

Standard precautions were enforced in all participating NHs, and residents underwent MRSA screening at baseline and 12 months thereafter. All carriers identified in intervention NHs, either at study entry or among newly admitted residents, underwent topical decolonization combined with environmental disinfection, except in cases of MRSA infection, MRSA bacteriuria, or deep skin ulcers.

RESULTS

NHs were randomly allocated to a control group (51 NHs, 2,412 residents) or an intervention group (53 NHs, 2,338 residents). Characteristics of NHs and residents were similar in both groups. The mean screening rates were 86% (range, 27%–100%) in control NHs and 87% (20%–100%) in intervention NHs. Prevalence of MRSA carriage averaged 8.9% in both control NHs (range, 0%–43%) and intervention NHs (range, 0%–38%) at baseline, and this rate significantly declined to 6.6% in control NHs and to 5.8% in intervention NHs after 12 months. However, the decline did not differ between groups (P=.66).

CONCLUSION

Universal screening followed by decolonization of carriers did not significantly reduce the prevalence of the MRSA carriage rate at 1 year compared with standard precautions.

Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2015;00(0): 1–8

Usefulness of Weekly Methicillin-ResistantStaphylococcus aureusScreening

We evaluated the usefulness of adding weekly methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) screening to our established admission screening and clinical sampling in 4 acute care units of a university hospital. Our results suggest that weekly MRSA screening allows the detection of 56.1% of all cases of hospital-acquired MRSA carriage. These cases would have remained undetected had admission screening and clinical sampling been the only types of surveillance in place.

mec-A-mediated Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus in a Referral Hospital, Tehran, Iran

Background:

The emerge of rapid and accurate detection of Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been highlighted.

Objectives:

The current study evaluated the prevalence of mec-A gene in biological specimens of various medical wards, in order to determine any possible relationship.

Patients and Methods:

Using traditional culture methods, 250 isolates were detected. The prevalence of mec-A mediated resistance was evaluated by PCR method.

Results:

Among 98 isolates (39.2%) with resistant inhibition zones, 92 isolates carried mec-A gene and were considered as MRSA. Significantly higher rate of MRSA was observed in the specimens from emergency department and intensive care unit (P value < 0.001). Although, the prevalence of MRSA was higher in patients with history of previous hospital admission within the past three months (P = 0.006), but only one case with the same history was hospitalized in the emergency ward that was among the wards with the highest rate of MRSA.

Conclusions:

The study findings show that, although there is higher rate of MRSA infection in patients with history of hospitalization, but even in cases without any history of medical admission, more detailed questions emphasizing on receiving any recent health care should be asked in a referral hospital, in order to determine the true community-acquired MRSA.

A double-blind, randomized, controlled trial of topical polysporin triple compound versus topical mupirocin for the eradication of colonization with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a complex continuing care population

BACKGROUND

Intranasal mupirocin or Polysporin Triple (PT) ointment (polymyxin B, bacitracin, gramicidin), in combination with chlorhexidine body washes, have been used for eradicating methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), but no comparative studies have been done.

METHODS

A double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy of mupirocin versus PT ointment in combination with chlorhexidine body washes in eradicating MRSA carriage was conducted. Asymptomatic MRSA carriers, medically stable and at least 18 years of age who were patients on medical wards, received twice daily application of either mupirocin or PT ointment to the anterior nares plus once daily 2% chlorhexidine body washes for seven days. Follow-up swabs from multiple sites using broth enrichment were conducted at 48 h, and one, two, four, eight and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

Of 103 patients eligible for analysis (54 mupirocin; 49 PT), no significant differences between the two groups with respect to baseline demographics, risk factors for MRSA or MRSA colonization sites were noted. At 48 h, 35 of 54 (65%) patients in the mupirocin group versus 15 of 49 (31%) in the PT group (P=0.001) were found to be MRSA negative at all sites. Significant differences were observed at one and two weeks but were not maintained at other intervals. In those with complete microbiological follow-up, MRSA eradication at all sites occurred in 12 of 39 (30.8%) mupirocin- and one of 36 (2.8%) PT-treated patients (P=0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both agents demonstrated poor efficacy and PT was significantly less efficacious than mupirocin at 12 weeks in eradicating MRSA from all sites.

Healthcare-associated pneumonia: diagnostic criteria and distinction from community-acquired pneumonia

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, pneumonia developing in patients who receive healthcare services in the outpatient environment has been classified as community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). However, recent investigations suggest that this type of infection, known as healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP), is distinct from CAP in terms of its epidemiology, etiology, and risk for infection with multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens.

METHODS

A Medline literature review of available clinical studies using the term HCAP was conducted to determine outcomes compared to CAP and effective empiric treatment strategies.

RESULTS

Analysis of multi-institutional clinical data showed that mortality in hospitalized patients with HCAP is greater than that in CAP, and patients with HCAP received inappropriate initial empiric antibiotic treatment more frequently than CAP patients. The bacterial pathogens associated with HCAP also differed from CAP with potentially MDR Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria being more common in HCAP.

CONCLUSIONS

All patients hospitalized with suspected HCAP should be evaluated for their underlying risk of infection with MDR pathogens. Because HCAP is similar to hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP), both clinically and etiologically, it should be treated as HAP until culture data become available.

Clinical significance of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureuscolonization in residents in community long-term-care facilities in Spain

Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA) is highly prevalent in Spanish hospitals and community long-term-care facilities (LTCFs). This longitudinal study was performed in community LTCFs to determine whether MRSA colonization is associated with MRSA infections and overall mortality. Nasal and decubitus ulcer cultures were performed every 6 months for an 18-month period on 178 MRSA-colonized residents (86 490 patient-days) and 196 non-MRSA carriers (97 470 patient-days). Fourteen residents developed MRSA infections and 10 of these were skin and soft tissue infections. Two patients with respiratory infections required hospitalization. The incidence rate of MRSA infection was 0·12/1000 patient-days in MRSA carriers and 0·05/1000 patient-days in non-carriers (P=0·46). No difference in MRSA infection rate was found according to the duration of MRSA colonization (P=0·69). The mortality rate was 20·8% in colonized residents and 16·8% in non-carriers; four residents with MRSA infection died. Overall mortality was statistically similar in both cohorts. Our results suggest that despite a high prevalence of MRSA colonization in LTCFs, MRSA infections are neither frequent nor severe while colonized residents remain at the facility. The epidemiological impact of an MRSA reservoir is more relevant than the clinical impact of this colonization for an individual resident and supports current recommendations to control MRSA spread in community LTCFs.

[Prevalence and risk factors of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization among residents living in long-term care facilities in southern Spain]

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has become the most important problem related to multiresistant microorganisms in the health care system. Long-term-care facilities (LTCFs) are one of the main reservoirs of this microorganism. The objective of our study was to determine the prevalence and factors associated with MRSA colonization among subjects living in LTCFs in southern Spain.

METHODS

During the period from 1st April 2009 to 30th June 2010, all subjects living in 17 LTCFs of our area were included in a cross-sectional study. Patients were screened by using nasal swabs and these were cultured in a chromogenic media. Suspected S. aureus colonies were identified by the latex agglutination test. Testing for antimicrobial identification and susceptibility was performed by an automated system. A logistic regression model was built, in which to be colonized by MRSA was the dependent variable, and covariates were entered if a difference with P<.2 was detected in the bivariate analysis. Residents were classified as MRSA carriers, methicillin-susceptible S. aureus carriers and non-carriers.

RESULTS

Seven hundreds and forty-four subjects were included. There were 481 (65%) females. The median (Q1-Q3) age was 81 (74-86) years. Seventy-nine (10.6%) and 67 (9%) were colonized by MRSA and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus, respectively. Significant risk factors for MRSA carriers were recent antibiotic use, previous hospital admission in the last three months, a high comorbidity measured by Charlson index and a history of colonization by MRSA.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of MRSA colonization in the LTCFs of our area is similar to that described in others European countries. In our institutions, subjects with recent antibiotic use, a high comorbidity, a history of MRSA colonization and a hospital admission in the last three months are more susceptible to be colonized by MRSA.

[Detection of nasal colonization methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing real-time genic amplification assay vs selective chromogenic media]

In contrast to "classical" genic amplification, real-time genic amplification can be performed in every laboratory without the need of sophisticated isolation procedures. Moreover, real-time genic amplification allows an early detection of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization, 2 hours compared to 1 or 2 days for culture.

OBJECTIVE

In order to assess the feasibility on Smartcycler of the IDI-MRSA real-time genic amplification assay in comparison with chromogenic media.

METHODS

A prospective study has been initiated in July 2004: nasal swabs were taken from patients entering the ICU, vascular surgery, diabetology and geriatry wards. During a 4 months period, 682 specimens have been obtained from 508 patients.

RESULTS

Sixty-four (9.3%) patients were positive by genic amplification and selective agar culture (CHROMagar MRSA, MRSASelect and/or ORSAB), 19 (2.9%) were positive by genic amplification only (3 of these patients were under antibiotic treatment); 572 specimens remained negative by both methods. The sensitivity and specificity of this assay were 100% and 96% respectively with a positive predictive value of 70% and negative predictive value of 100%. Initially 82 nasal specimens were unresolved (12%). 38 were resolved following a freeze-thaw cycle. Thus, 44 (6.4%) were unresolved specimens. Comparison between CHROMagar MRSA and MRSASelect showed a good correlation for the detection at 24 hours (5.5% and 5.6% respectively). These two chromogenic media allowed a much better detection of MRSA than ORSAB medium within 24H.

CONCLUSION

The results obtained by the early real-time genic amplification for the detection of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus are promising. Despite 6.4% amplification failure, we consider that IDI-MRSA real-time genic amplification assay represents a significant breakthrough in the detection of colonization.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in elderly care facilities

Among multidrug-resistant bacteria, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is of immediate concern, given its potential for pathogenicity and widespread presence in geriatric hospitals. Epidemiological surveys indicate that rates of MRSA cross-transmission are increasing in elderly care facilities. MRSA carriage is far more frequent than MRSA-positive clinical specimens in this setting, and the consequences of these epidemics in terms of morbidity, remain limited within these facilities. However, given that patients are continually transferred between long-term and acute-care facilities, it is reasonable to consider these units together with all other care units and to measure the effect of MRSA on a regional healthcare network, rather than on the scale of a given ward or hospital. With regard to the worldwide increase in morbidity associated with MRSA, the emergence of a community-based disease linked to these strains and the emergence of glycopeptide-resistant strains, the application of a voluntary strategy including screening, isolation and eventually, topical decolonization in elderly care facilities, appears to be an urgent matter of priority, even if this strategy will be expensive.

High prevalence of carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus at hospital admission in elderly patients: implications for infection control strategies

BACKGROUND

Despite contact isolation precautions for patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), MRSA infections are increasing in many countries.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of a potential unrecognized reservoir of MRSA carried by patients in acute care wards, we determined the prevalence of MRSA at hospital admission, with special emphasis on screening-specimen yields.

SETTING

A 1100-bed teaching hospital in Paris, France.

METHODS

Nasal screening cultures were performed at admission to a tertiary-care teaching hospital for patients older than 75 years.

RESULTS

MRSA was isolated from 63 (7.9%) of 797 patients. On the multivariate analysis, variables significantly associated with MRSA carriage were presence of chronic skin lesions (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 5.10; 95% confidence interval [CI95], 2.52-10.33); transfer from a nursing home, rehabilitation unit, or long-term-care unit (AOR, 4.52; CI95, 2.23-9.18); and poor chronic health status (AOR, 1.80; CI95, 1.02-3.18). Without admission screening, 84.1% of MRSA carriers would have been missed at hospital admission and 76.2% during their hospital stay. Furthermore, 81.1% of days at risk for MRSA dissemination would have been spent without contact isolation precautions had admission screening not been performed.

CONCLUSIONS

MRSA carriage at hospital admission is far more prevalent than MRSA-positive clinical specimens. This may contribute to failure of contact isolation programs. Screening cultures at admission help to identify the reservoir of unknown MRSA patients.

[Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities: what is the best strategy?]

BACKGROUND

The risk associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been decreasing for several years in intensive care departments, but is now increasing in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities (R-CCF). The aim of this study was to use published data and our own experience to discuss the roles of screening for MRSA carriers, the type of isolation to be implemented and the efficiency of chemical decontamination.

DISCUSSION

Screening identifies over 90% of patients colonized with MRSA upon admission to R-CCF versus only 50% for intensive care units. Only totally dependent patients acquire MRSA. Thus, strict geographical isolation, as opposed to "social reinsertion", is clearly of no value. However, this should not lead to the abandoning of isolation, which remains essential during the administration of care. The use of chemicals to decolonize the nose and healthy skin appeared to be of some value and the application of this procedure could make technical isolation unnecessary in a non-negligible proportion of cases.

SUMMARY

Given the increase in morbidity associated with MRSA observed in numerous hospitals, the emergence of a community-acquired disease associated with these strains and the evolution of glycopeptide-resistant strains, the voluntary application of a strategy combining screening, technical isolation and chemical decolonization in R-CCF appears to be an urgent matter of priority.

Control of Enterobacteriaceae producing extended-spectrum beta-lactamase in intensive care units: rectal screening may not be needed in non-epidemic situations

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the usefulness of screening cultures in the control of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae in intensive care units (ICUs).

DESIGN

A 4-year retrospective study.

SETTING

Two adult ICUs of a university-affiliated public hospital in France.

RESULTS

A total of 7,777 specimens were analyzed and 28 (0.97%) of 2,883 screened patients had a positive result on a screening test, among the 3,678 admitted patients. Thirteen of these 28 patients were only carriers; 4 were carriers and then were colonized or infected 2, 2, 3, and 8 days later, respectively; and 11 were colonized or infected before a screening test was positive. Cluster analysis showed that the occurrence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae cross-transmission within both ICUs was limited to 9 cases. Thus, most cases (19 of 28) were probably imported. Surveillance cultures failed to detect 9 of the 19 cases.

CONCLUSION

The low prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae carriers on admission (0.45%) and the relative ineffectiveness of our screening test to detect imported cases suggest that systematic detection of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in ICU patients is not cost-effective and that the use of clinical cultures may be sufficient to control ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in non-epidemic situations.

Choix d’une stratégie de dépistage du Staphylococcus aureus résistant à la méticilline à l’admission en service de soins de suite et de réadaptation

OBJECTIVE

To identify a strategy of MRSA screening (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) on admission to geriatric rehabilitation units, which would lead to acceptable efficacy and cost compared with a reference maximaliste strategy combining all six sampling sites. Method MRSA screening was conducted prospectively for 3 months in all the patients admitted to a geriatric follow-up and rehabilitation unit, using samples from the nostrils, armpits, urine scars cutaneous ulcers and sores. Six strategies were defined combing different sampling sites. Their efficacy and cost were compared with those of a maximaliste strategy combining the 6 sampling sites.

RESULTS

Combined screening of all six sites was the most effective but also the most expensive strategy. The least expensive strategy used only samples from ulcers and sores, but its efficacy was of only 45%. The strategy with the lowest loss of efficacy compared to the reference strategy combined the sampling of ulcers and sores and sampling from the nostrils: it was efficient in 91% and its cost was 2.5 fold lower than the cost of the reference strategy.

DISCUSSION

A preliminary, short term study established an MRSA screening strategy adapted to the specificities of a geriatric rehabilitation unit and its recruitment. The ability to define the optimal strategy for MRSA screening in a geriatric rehabilitation and follow-up unit may be an important factor in controlling the diffusion of MRSA.

Surveillance régionale de l'évolution de Staphylococcus aureus résistant à la méticilline (SARM) : quels résultats pour quels enseignements ?

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe the evolution of MRSA within hospitals located in Franche-Comté from 1999 to 2003 and to establish the MRSA risk according to the type of hospitalization.

METHODS

Surveillance of multidrug resistant bacteria was carried out according to the French national guidelines for the prevention of nosocomial infections.

RESULTS

The global incidence of MRSA colonized/infected patients (screened by clinical samples) per 1000 patient-days had decreased from 0.73 in 1999 to 0.58 in 2003 (P < 0.004). However, analyzing the results according to each type of hospitalization revealed great heterogeneity. In 2003, the increase of MRSA incidence in short-term public hospitalization was indeed alarming whereas MRSA risk had regularly decreased in the other hospitalization types (rehabilitation and long-term care-facilities) since 1999. The number of potentially serious colonizations/infections caused by MRSA (bacteremia, deep infections, and pulmonary infections) accounted for 12.8% of all colonizations/infections.

CONCLUSION

MRSA, in spite of improved prevention in our region, remains responsible for numerous infections.

Epidemiological relatedness of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from a tertiary hospital and a geriatric institution in Spain

From January 2000 to June 2002, 24 Staphylococcus aureus isolates were recovered from decubitus ulcers of patients in a geriatric institution, of which 17 (70.8%) were methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Antibiotic resistance and DNA macrorestriction (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis; PFGE) patterns of the MRSA isolates were compared with a collection of 161 MRSA isolates from patients admitted to the institution's reference hospital. PFGE revealed the presence of five clonal types (found also in hospitalised patients) among the 17 MRSA isolates. The findings suggest nosocomial acquisition of the MRSA strains by five patients, with subsequent dissemination of the strains within the institution. The high rate of MRSA highlights the need for epidemiological analysis to control the dissemination of MRSA in long-term care facilities.

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities: what is the best strategy?

Background

The risk associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) has been decreasing for several years in intensive care departments, but is now increasing in rehabilitation and chronic-care-facilities (R-CCF). The aim of this study was to use published data and our own experience to discuss the roles of screening for MRSA carriers, the type of isolation to be implemented and the efficiency of chemical decolonization.

Discussion

Screening identifies over 90% of patients colonised with MRSA upon admission to R-CCF versus only 50% for intensive care units. Only totally dependent patients acquire MRSA. Thus, strict geographical isolation, as opposed to "social reinsertion", is clearly of no value. However, this should not lead to the abandoning of isolation, which remains essential during the administration of care. The use of chemicals to decolonize the nose and healthy skin appeared to be of some value and the application of this procedure could make technical isolation unnecessary in a non-negligible proportion of cases.

Summary

Given the increase in morbidity associated with MRSA observed in numerous hospitals, the emergence of a community-acquired disease associated with these strains and the evolution of glycopeptide-resistant strains, the voluntary application of a strategy combining screening, technical isolation and chemical decolonization in R-CCF appears to be an urgent matter of priority.

Modelling the usefulness of a dedicated cohort facility to prevent the dissemination of MRSA

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine whether or not a surgical dedicated cohort facility, mainly dedicated to the care of orthopaedic patients, can control the risk of infection caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). We tested this hypothesis on the orthopaedic surgery ward of a university-affiliated public hospital with 1228 beds by determining whether there was a significant correlation between the colonization pressure exerted by MRSA and the number of cases of acquired MRSA. This was then used as a tool to predict the number of patients contaminated with MRSA in hospitals with and without dedicated cohort facilities. We found that the relative risk of MRSA acquisition increased with the colonization pressure exerted by MRSA imported cases. This statistical model enabled us to predict that the risk of MRSA acquisition would increase by 160% per year in the absence of a dedicated cohort facility. We conclude that these units are useful to control the spread of MRSA in hospitals.