Gentamicin-susceptible or gentamicin-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a case-case study

Large mobile genetic elements carrying resistance genes that do not confer a fitness burden in healthcare-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Healthcare-associated (HA) meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clone CC22 SCCmecIV (EMRSA-15) has recently overtaken CC30/ST36 SCCmecII (EMRSA-16) as the dominant clone in UK hospitals. CC22 SCCmecIV shows greater fitness than CC30 SCCmecII, although both are successful global pathogens. The aim of this study was to test whether mobile genetic elements (MGEs), specifically SCCmec and large plasmids encoding resistance genes, are a burden and contribute to this fitness difference. Thirty-nine clinical isolates of MRSA and meticillin-sensitive S. aureus from lineages CC30 and CC22 with a variety of antibiotic resistance genes were grown in the absence of antibiotics. A range of relative fitness measures were used to compare clinical isolates with and without SCCmecII and SCCmecIV. The same fitness measures were used to compare eight isolates with and without naturally occurring large antibiotic resistance plasmids carrying gentamicin resistance (determined by microarray) and an isolate with an introduced plasmid. Growth rate, competitive ability during co-culture and survival after desiccation were then compared. Carriage of SCCmecII contributed to the reduced fitness of CC30 MRSA. However, we found no evidence of a fitness cost due to carriage of SCCmecIV in CC22, or large antibiotic resistance plasmids in CC30 or multiple resistances in both lineages. In conclusion, many large MGEs are not a fitness burden. Surprisingly, lineage background was the most important determinant of fitness. Our results suggest CC22 SCCmecIV will remain a successful healthcare-associated clone, and resistance to meticillin and gentamicin is likely to be maintained even in the absence of antibiotic pressure.

Molecular and epidemiological evaluation of strain replacement in patients previously harboring gentamicin-resistant MRSA

Gentamicin-susceptible methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (GS-MRSA) clones have gradually replaced gentamicin-resistant MRSA (GR-MRSA) clones in many European countries. We studied molecular and epidemiological aspects of MRSA strain replacement in individual patients. All patients from whom at least 2 MRSA strains showing different gentamicin susceptibility patterns were isolated between 1996 and 2008 were retrospectively identified. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and clonality between isolates were determined using molecular methods. Risk factors for individual GR-MRSA SCCmec I (prevalent clone) strain replacement with GS-MRSA non-SCCmec I types were studied in a nested case-crossover study (n = 55 patients). MRSA strain replacement was observed in 127 patients, 85 (67%) of whom were initially colonized with GR-MRSA replaced subsequently by GS-MRSA. Most GS-MRSA replacement strains (50; 59%) possessed SCCmec IV. All MRSA isolate pairs from the same patient that consisted of different gentamicin susceptibility and SCCmec types were also genotypically different. Exposure to domiciliary nursing assistance (odds ratio [OR], 8.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 53.7) and high Charlson scores (OR, 7.1; 95% CI, 1.1 to 46.8) were associated with individual strain replacement. In individual patients, exogenous acquisition of a different MRSA strain was responsible for strain replacement in most cases. Domiciliary nursing assistance could be a target for specific control measures to prevent transmission of GS-MRSA in our setting.