New Definitions Will Help, but Cultures are Critical for Resolving Unanswered Questions AboutClostridium difficile

Combination of culture, antigen and toxin detection, and cytotoxin neutralization assay for optimal Clostridium difficile diagnostic testing

BACKGROUND

There has been a growing interest in developing an appropriate laboratory diagnostic algorithm for Clostridium difficile, mainly as a result of increases in both the number and severity of cases of C difficile infection in the past decade. A C difficile diagnostic algorithm is necessary because diagnostic kits, mostly for the detection of toxins A and B or glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) antigen, are not sufficient as stand-alone assays for optimal diagnosis of C difficile infection. In addition, conventional reference methods for C difficile detection (eg, toxigenic culture and cytotoxin neutralization [CTN] assays) are not routinely practiced in diagnostic laboratory settings.

OBJECTIVE

To review the four-step algorithm used at Diagnostic Services of Manitoba sites for the laboratory diagnosis of toxigenic C difficile.

RESULT

One year of retrospective C difficile data using the proposed algorithm was reported. Of 5695 stool samples tested, 9.1% (n=517) had toxigenic C difficile. Sixty per cent (310 of 517) of toxigenic C difficile stools were detected following the first two steps of the algorithm. CTN confirmation of GDH-positive, toxin A- and B-negative assays resulted in detection of an additional 37.7% (198 of 517) of toxigenic C difficile. Culture of the third specimen, from patients who had two previous negative specimens, detected an additional 2.32% (12 of 517) of toxigenic C difficile samples.

DISCUSSION

Using GDH antigen as the screening and toxin A and B as confirmatory test for C difficile, 85% of specimens were reported negative or positive within 4 h. Without CTN confirmation for GDH antigen and toxin A and B discordant results, 37% (195 of 517) of toxigenic C difficile stools would have been missed. Following the algorithm, culture was needed for only 2.72% of all specimens submitted for C difficile testing.

CONCLUSION

The overview of the data illustrated the significance of each stage of this four-step C difficile algorithm and emphasized the value of using CTN assay and culture as parts of an algorithm that ensures accurate diagnosis of toxigenic C difficile.

Impact of different empirical antibiotic treatment regimens for community-acquired pneumonia on the emergence of Clostridium difficile

BACKGROUND

Treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) with newer fluoroquinolones may contribute to selection for Clostridium difficile. We studied the prevalence of C. difficile carriage and C. difficile infection (CDI) on admission, and nosocomial acquisition rates in patients hospitalized for CAP and compared different empirical treatment strategies.

METHODS

In a prospective study among patients admitted for antibiotic treatment of CAP, consecutive stool and skin samples were collected and cultured for C. difficile. Cultured isolates were typed by PCR ribotyping and characterized for toxinogenicity.

RESULTS

In total, 20 of 107 (18.7%) patients included carried C. difficile. Various ribotypes were found and 14 (70%) isolates were toxinogenic. On admission, prevalence of C. difficile carriage was 9.4% (n=9), of which 22% also carried C. difficile on the skin and one patient had mild CDI with persistent positive cultures. The overall nosocomial acquisition rate of C. difficile carriage was 11.2%. No nosocomially acquired CDI occurred. Acquisition rates of C. difficile were 11.9% (5/45) in moxifloxacin-, 11.1% (5/47) in β-lactam- and 9.0% (1/14) in β-lactam plus macrolide- or fluoroquinolone-treated patients (P=0.84). Risk factors for C. difficile carriage were intravenous antibiotic treatment >7 days [odds ratio (OR) 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30 to 11.79] and hospitalization during the past 3 months (OR 4.08; 95% CI 1.40 to 11.90).

CONCLUSIONS

In a non-outbreak setting with a low endemic rate, the prevalence of C. difficile carriage in patients admitted because of CAP is high and nosocomial acquisition rates for C. difficile colonization are 11%. Fluoroquinolones were not associated with increased acquisition rates for C. difficile as compared with other empirical regimens for CAP.

Evaluation of a chromogenic culture medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile within 24 hours

Rapid and effective methods for the isolation of Clostridium difficile from stool samples are desirable to obtain isolates for typing or to facilitate accurate diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea. We report on the evaluation of a prototype chromogenic medium (ID C. difficile prototype [IDCd]) for isolation of C. difficile. The chromogenic medium was compared using (i) 368 untreated stool samples that were also inoculated onto CLO medium, (ii) 339 stool samples that were subjected to alcohol shock and also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars, and (iii) standardized suspensions of 10 C. difficile ribotypes (untreated and alcohol treated) that were also inoculated onto five distinct selective agars. Two hundred thirty-six isolates of C. difficile were recovered from 368 untreated stool samples, and all but 1 of these strains (99.6%) were recovered on IDCd within 24 h, whereas 74.6% of isolates were recovered on CLO medium after 48 h. Of 339 alcohol-treated stool samples cultured onto IDCd and five other selective agars, C. difficile was recovered from 218 samples using a combination of all media. The use of IDCd allowed recovery of 96.3% of isolates within 24 h, whereas 51 to 83% of isolates were recovered within 24 h using the five other media. Finally, when they were challenged with pure cultures, all 10 ribotypes of C. difficile generated higher colony counts on IDCd irrespective of alcohol pretreatment or duration of incubation. We conclude that IDCd is an effective medium for isolation of C. difficile from stool samples within 24 h.

Clostridium difficile infection: a critical overview

Clostridium difficile is a gram-positive, spore-forming, toxin-producing anaerobic bacillus identified as the causal agent of a variety of manifestations typically isolated to the colon, but in its severe form, it can lead to sepsis and death. C. difficile infection due to a toxin gene variant strain (BI/NAP1) has been identified at the center of outbreaks and has resulted in increased mortality. Many questions remain as to how this strain appeared so quickly and has harmed or killed so many patients. We present a review of C. difficile infection, discussing its clinical presentation, diagnosis, management, and prevention.

Identification of a pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) and the effect of repeated testing, sensitivity, and specificity on perceived prevalence of CDI

OBJECTIVE

To describe a pseudo-outbreak of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) caused by a faulty toxin assay lot and to determine the effect of sensitivity, specificity, and repeated testing for C. difficile on perceived CDI burden, positive predictive value, and false-positive results.

DESIGN

Outbreak investigation and criterion standard.

PATIENTS

Patients hospitalized at a tertiary care hospital who had at least 1 toxin assay for detection of C. difficile performed during the period from July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2006.

METHODS

The run control chart method and the chi(2) test were used to compare CDI rates and the proportion of positive test results before, during, and after the pseudo-outbreak. The effect of repeated testing was evaluated by using 3 hypothetical models with a sample of 10,000 patients and various assay sensitivity and specificity estimates.

RESULTS

In November of 2005, the CDI rate at the hospital increased from 1.5 to 2.6 cases per 1,000 patient-days (P < .01), and the proportion of positive test results increased from 13.6% to 22.1% (P < .01). An investigation revealed a pseudo-outbreak caused by a faulty toxin assay lot. A decrease of only 1.2% in the specificity of the toxin assay would result in a 32% increase in perceived incidence of CDI at this institution. When calculated by use of the manufacturer's stated specificity and sensitivity and this institution's testing practices, the positive predictive value of the test decreased from 80.6% to 4.1% for patients who received 3 tests.

CONCLUSION

Specificity is as important as sensitivity when testing for CDI. False-positive CDI cases can drain hospital resources and adversely affect patients. Repeated testing for C. difficile should be performed with caution.

Necessary but not sufficient: a comparison of surveillance definitions of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea

In this article, we describe our comparison of the Cleveland Clinic surveillance definition of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea and the definition mandated by the Ohio Department of Health. We found the definitions to be concordant only 71% of the time; the Ohio Department of Health definition identified 278 of the 391 cases identified by the Cleveland Clinic definition. Surveillance definitions mandated by the Ohio Department of Health overrepresented the number of cases attributable to nosocomial transmission at our institution.

Auranofin disrupts selenium metabolism in Clostridium difficile by forming a stable Au-Se adduct

Clostridium difficile is a nosocomial pathogen whose incidence and importance are on the rise. Previous work in our laboratory characterized the central role of selenoenzyme-dependent Stickland reactions in C. difficile metabolism. In this work we have identified, using mass spectrometry, a stable complex formed upon reaction of auranofin (a gold-containing drug) with selenide in vitro. X-ray absorption spectroscopy supports the structure that we proposed on the basis of mass-spectrometric data. Auranofin potently inhibits the growth of C. difficile but does not similarly affect other clostridia that do not utilize selenoproteins to obtain energy. Moreover, auranofin inhibits the incorporation of radioisotope selenium ((75)Se) in selenoproteins in both Escherichia coli, the prokaryotic model for selenoprotein synthesis, and C. difficile without impacting total protein synthesis. Auranofin blocks the uptake of selenium and results in the accumulation of the auranofin-selenide adduct in the culture medium. Addition of selenium in the form of selenite or L-selenocysteine to the growth medium significantly reduces the inhibitory action of auranofin on the growth of C. difficile. On the basis of these results, we propose that formation of this complex and the subsequent deficiency in available selenium for selenoprotein synthesis is the mechanism by which auranofin inhibits C. difficile growth. This study demonstrates that targeting selenium metabolism provides a new avenue for antimicrobial development against C. difficile and other selenium-dependent pathogens.

Effective and reduced-cost modified selective medium for isolation of Clostridium difficile

Both for epidemiologic studies and for diagnostic testing, there is a need for effective, economical, and readily available selective media for the culture of Clostridium difficile. We have developed a reduced-cost substitute for cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose agar (CCFA), which is an effective but expensive selective medium for C. difficile. The modified medium, called C. difficile brucella agar (CDBA), includes an enriched brucella base as a substitute for proteose peptone no. 2, and the concentration of sodium taurocholate has been reduced from 0.1% to 0.05%. To compare the sensitivities and selectivities of CDBA and CCFA, cultures for C. difficile were performed using stool samples from patients with C. difficile-associated disease. CDBA was as sensitive as CCFA for the recovery of C. difficile, with a similar frequency of breakthrough growth of stool microflora (25% versus 31%, respectively). A liquid formulation of the modified medium, termed C. difficile brucella broth (CDBB), stimulated rapid germination and outgrowth of C. difficile spores, at a rate comparable to that in cycloserine-cefoxitin-fructose broth. Our results suggest that CDBA and CDBB are sensitive, selective, and reduced-cost media for the recovery of C. difficile from stool samples.

Clinical recognition and diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection

Prompt and precise diagnosis is an important aspect of effective management of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI). CDI causes 15%-25% of all cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhea, the severity of which ranges from mild diarrhea to fulminant pseudomembranous colitis. Several factors, especially advanced age and hospitalization, should be considered in the diagnosis of CDI. In particular, nosocomial diarrhea arising >72 hours after admission among patients receiving antibiotics is highly likely to have resulted from CDI. Testing of stool for the presence of C. difficile toxin confirms the diagnosis of CDI. However, performance of an enzyme immunoassay is the usual method by which CDI is confirmed, but this test appears to be relatively insensitive, compared with the cell cytotoxicity assay and stool culture for toxigenic C. difficile on selective medium. Endoscopy and computed tomography are less sensitive than stool toxin assays but may be useful when immediate results are important or other confounding conditions rank high in the differential diagnosis. Often overlooked aspects of this diagnosis are high white blood cell counts (which are sometimes in the leukemoid range) and hypoalbuminemia.

Antimicrobial-associated risk factors for Clostridium difficile infection

Antimicrobial therapy plays a central role in the pathogenesis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), presumably through disruption of indigenous intestinal microflora, thereby allowing C. difficile to grow and produce toxin. Investigations involving animal models and studies performed in vitro suggest that inhibitory activity against C. difficile and differences in the propensity to stimulate toxin production may also influence the likelihood that particular drugs may cause CDI. Although nearly all antimicrobial classes have been associated with CDI, clindamycin, third-generation cephalosporins, and penicillins have traditionally been considered to harbor the greatest risk. Recent studies have also implicated fluoroquinolones as high-risk agents, a finding that is most likely to be related in part to increasing fluoroquinolone resistance among epidemic strains (i.e., restriction-endonuclease analysis group BI/North American PFGE type 1 strains) and some nonepidemic strains of C. difficile. Restrictions in the use of clindamycin and third-generation cephalosporins have been associated with reductions in CDI. Because use of any antimicrobial has the potential to induce the onset of CDI and disease caused by other health care-associated pathogens, antimicrobial stewardship programs that promote judicious use of antimicrobials are encouraged in concert with environmental and infection control-related efforts.

Update on the changing epidemiology of Clostridium difficile-associated disease

In the past, Clostridium difficile-associated disease (CDAD) was thought of mainly as a nosocomial disease associated with the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, but its epidemiology seems to be changing. Since 2002, outbreaks of severe CDAD associated with increased mortality and reduced effectiveness of treatment with metronidazole have focused attention on this challenging pathogen. A fluoroquinolone-resistant strain of C. difficile (BI/NAP1/027) has been predominantly associated with these outbreaks. Changes in the epidemiology of CDAD include the emergence of new at-risk populations and the increased incidence of the disease. Infection control programs and more effective treatments offer hope that future outbreaks of CDAD can be controlled.

Fluoroquinolone use and risk factors for Clostridium difficile-associated disease within a Veterans Administration health care system

BACKGROUND

Prompted by the changing profile of Clostridium difficile infection and the impact of formulary policies in hospitals, we performed this study when an increase in the incidence of C. difficile-associated disease was noted at our health care center (Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington).

METHODS

A retrospective, matched case-control study of patients presenting to the Veterans Administration Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington during 2004 was performed. Conditional logistic analysis determined risk factors for case patients, defined as individuals with diarrhea and test results (i.e., culture or toxin assay results) positive for C. difficile, and control subjects, defined as individuals with diarrhea and test results negative for C. difficile.

RESULTS

C. difficile-associated disease incidence was 29.2 cases per 10,000 inpatient-days. The increase in the incidence of C. difficile-associated diarrhea that paralleled increased gatifloxacin use was not attributable to use of the antimicrobial but was a reflection of seasonal variation in the rate of C. difficile-associated disease. Multivariate analysis controlling for the time at which the assay was performed, the age of the patient, ward, and source of acquisition (community-acquired vs. nosocomial disease) found 6 significant risk factors for C. difficile-associated diarrhea: receipt of clindamycin (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 29.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.58-249.4), receipt of penicillin (aOR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.2-13.9), having a lower intestinal condition (aOR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.3-6.1), total number of antibiotics received (aOR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1-1.7), number of prior hospital admissions (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.6), and number of comorbid conditions (aOR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.1-1.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The increase in the number of cases of C. difficile-associated disease was not attributable to a formulary change of fluoroquinolones; instead, the incidence was within expected seasonal variations for C. difficile-associated disease. Recognition of community-acquired cases and the use of culture may help to identify additional cases of C. difficile-associated disease. Early diagnosis and treatment of C. difficile cases may shorten the duration of hospital stays and reduce the number of outbreaks and readmissions, mortality, and other consequences of C. difficile infection.