The A, B, BI, and Cs of Clostridium difficile

A systematic evaluation of methods to optimize culture-based recovery of Clostridium difficile from stool specimens

With the increasing prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection among hospitalized patients, a clear understanding of C. difficile epidemiology is needed to evaluate current prevention policies, and to create new and effective policies. To determine the epidemiology of C. difficile, the most sensitive methods for detection of C. difficile are required. The purpose of this study was to systematically assess multiple methods to determine the most sensitive method to recover C. difficile from stool and rectal swabs. Stool samples from healthy asymptomatic individuals that were collected and confirmed to be culture negative for C. difficile were spiked with known concentrations of C. difficile ranging from 10(4) CFU of C. difficile per ml of stool to 10 CFU per ml. Two sets of experiments (A and B) were performed and each involved multiple combinations of untreated and treated stool/rectal swab specimens and selective and non-selective broth and agar. Overall, recovery of C. difficile was increased with the use of an initial broth enrichment followed by plating to solid medium. The most sensitive method of C. difficile detection for both stools and swab specimens was heat shock prior to inoculation of cycloserine-cefoxitin mannitol broth with taurocholate lysozyme cysteine (CCMB, Anaerobe Systems, Morgan Hill, CA) followed by isolation from pre-reduced TSA II with 5% sheep blood (BAP, BBL BD and Co., Sparks, MD). Identifying the most sensitive method of recovery will allow for further study of asymptomatic C. difficile carriers and their role in the epidemiology of C. difficile.

Epidemiological model for Clostridium difficile transmission in healthcare settings

OBJECTIVE

Recent outbreaks of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) have been difficult to control, and data indicate that the importance of different sources of transmission may have changed. Our objectives were to evaluate the contributions of asymptomatic and symptomatic C. difficile carriers to new colonizations and to determine the most important epidemiological factors influencing C. difficile transmission.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS

Retrospective cohort study of all patients admitted to medical wards at a large tertiary care hospital in the United States in the calendar year 2008.

METHODS

Data from six medical wards and published literature were used to develop a compartmental model of C. difficile transmission. Patients could be in one of five transition states in the model: resistant to colonization (R), susceptible to colonization (S), asymptomatically colonized without protection against CDI (C(-)), asymptomatically colonized with protection against CDI (C(+)), and diseased (ie, with CDI; D).

RESULTS

The contributions of C(-), C(+), and D patients to new colonizations were similar. The simulated basic reproduction number ranged from 0.55 to 1.99, with a median of 1.04. These values suggest that transmission within the ward alone from patients with CDI cannot sustain new C. difficile colonizations and therefore that the admission of colonized patients plays an important role in sustaining transmission in the ward. The epidemiological parameters that ranked as the most influential were the proportion of admitted C(-) patients and the transmission coefficient for asymptomatic carriers.

CONCLUSION

Our study underscores the need to further evaluate the role of asymptomatically colonized patients in C. difficile transmission in healthcare settings.

Multicenter study of Clostridium difficile infection rates from 2000 to 2006

OBJECTIVE

To compare incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) during a 6-year period among 5 geographically diverse academic medical centers across the United States by use of recommended standardized surveillance definitions of CDI that incorporate recent information on healthcare facility (HCF) exposure.

METHODS

Data on C. difficile toxin assay results and dates of hospital admission and discharge were collected from electronic databases. Chart review was performed for patients with a positive C. difficile toxin assay result who were identified within 48 hours after hospital admission to determine whether they had any HCF exposure during the 90 days prior to their hospital admission. CDI cases, defined as any inpatient with a stool toxin assay positive for C. difficile, were categorized into 5 surveillance definitions based on recent HCF exposure. Annual CDI rates were calculated and evaluated by use of the chi(2) test for trend and the chi(2) summary test.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were significant increases in the overall incidence rates of HCF-onset, HCF-associated CDI (from 7.0 to 8.5 cases per 10,000 patient-days; P < .001); community-onset, HCF-associated CDI attributed to a study hospital (from 1.1 to 1.3 cases per 10,000 patient-days; P = .003); and community-onset, HCF-associated CDI not attributed to a study hospital (from 0.8 to 1.5 cases per 1,000 admissions overall; P < .001). For each surveillance definition of CDI, there were significant differences in the total incidence rate between HCFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The increasing incidence rates of CDI over time and across healthcare institutions and the correlation of CDI incidence in different surveillance categories suggest that CDI may be a regional problem and not isolated to a single HCF within a community.

Prevention of healthcare‐associated Clostridium difficile infection: what works?

Prevention of Clostridium difficile infection has become extremely important because of increases in its incidence and severity. Unfortunately, efforts at C. difficile infection prevention are hampered by lack of data to support optimal prevention methods, especially for endemic C. difficile infection. Studies are needed to define the optimal prevention practices and to investigate novel prevention methods.

The ecology and pathobiology of Clostridium difficile infections: an interdisciplinary challenge

Clostridium difficile is a well recognized pathogen of humans and animals. Although C. difficile was first identified over 70 years ago, much remains unknown in regards to the primary source of human acquisition and its pathobiology. These deficits in our knowledge have been intensified by dramatic increases in both the frequency and severity of disease in humans over the last decade. The changes in C. difficile epidemiology might be due to the emergence of a hypervirulent stain of C. difficile, ageing of the population, altered risk of developing infection with newer medications, and/or increased exposure to C. difficile outside of hospitals. In recent years, there have been numerous reports documenting C. difficile contamination of various foods, and reports of similarities between strains that infect animals and strains that infect humans as well. The purposes of this review are to highlight the many challenges to diagnosing, treating, and preventing C. difficile infection in humans, and to stress that collaboration between human and veterinary researchers is needed to control this pathogen.