Risk factors for MRSA colonization in dermatologic patients in Germany

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriage requires well-defined risk factors (RFs). Except for "chronic wounds", RFs are mostly specified in national recommendations. To avoid ineffective and expensive screening, we divided the entity "wounds" into different categories and calculated further RFs in dermatologic patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After a surveillance period with general MRSA screening, we correlated MRSA results with wound categories and dermatologically relevant diagnoses. We analyzed the screening efficacy by adding potential new RFs.

RESULTS

Ulcers (pressure, arterial, combined pressure/arterial ulcers, ulcers otherwise unclassified), type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM), and atopic dermatitis (AD) were significantly associated with MRSA carriage. Tumors (subgroup basal and squamous cell carcinoma) were also significantly associated with MRSA carriage but had a protective odds ratio. Differentiation of wound types did not provide added benefit. In all MRSA-positive patients with chronic wounds, other RKI-listed RFs or type 2 DM were found. Screening sensitivity was increased combining classic RFs (except wounds) with type 2 DM and AD.

CONCLUSIONS

In dermatologic patients, AD and type 2 DM were identified as new RFs. Distinct wound types were also found to be significant RFs, but differentiated screening offers no benefit. When screening patients according to national recommendations, excluding wounds but including type 2 DM and AD, there is no loss of sensitivity.

[Microbial stress of skin and wounds in clinical aspects and practice. Between search and destroy and monitor and relax]

The antibiotic treatment of microbial pathogens of the skin and wounds could so far not fulfil the expectations of an effective and permanent elimination of pathogens so that local treatment with antiseptic agents as a flanking measure to wound cleansing and debridement has become increasingly more established. Because an antiseptic treatment does not actually represent a treatment of infections, the current antimicrobial treatment strategy for infections in skin and wound areas consists of combined antibiotic and flanking antiseptic administration following debridement. However, the combined therapy is not always successful. There is an urgent need for new forms of therapy particularly to combat multiresistant pathogens in biofilms in infections of chronic and other complicated wounds.

Triple swabbing allows sensitive MRSA detection in dermatologic patients of a university tertiary care hospital

BACKGROUND

To optimize preventive measures to control MRSA, we investigated retrospectively the suitability of a multiple site screening model and the optimal sampling technique to detect MRSA in a university-based phlebology and skin cancer center in Germany.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

During 4.5 years samples of 3 712 inpatients in a dermatologic department were analyzed for MRSA by conventional microbiologic cultures and in parallel by PCR. Samples were taken from nares, wounds and skin lesions.

RESULTS

MRSA was detected in 60 inpatients (1.6%). 268 of 7 269 (3.7%) samples at admission and during hospital stay were found positive ñ 96 (35.8%) of these were swabs of nares, 59 (22.0%) surveillance swabs, 53 (19.8%) wound swabs and 42 (15.7%) from other dermatologic lesions. Twenty-five of 60 patients (41.7%) were found positive only in the nares, 10 (16.7%) patients only in wounds and 4 (6.7%) patients only in lesions. 166 (61.9%) of all positive culture samples became positive 24 hours after cultivation, 86 (32.1%) after 48 hours, and 16 (6.0%) after 72 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Highest sensitivity to detect MRSA can be reached by combining three swabs: nares, wounds and skin lesions (ìtriple-testî). Culture of screening specimens for 72 hours is recommended.