Pseudo-outbreak of Klebsiella oxytoca spontaneous bacterial peritonitis attributed to contamination of multidose vials of culture medium supplement

Higher accuracy of genotypic identification compared to phenotyping in the diagnosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcus infection in orthopedic surgery

PURPOSE

To determine whether Repetitive Extragenic Palindromic PCR (rep-PCR) genotyping can improve the diagnosis of coagulase-negative staphylococcal (CoNS) orthopaedic infections in comparison to phenotyping.

METHODS

Prospective study comparing the results of phenotypic/genotypic (rep-PCR) testing in patients with suspected CoNS infection. Each strain was analysed using both methods. Strains identified as identical in ≥2 samples were considered as pathogenic.

RESULTS

255 CoNS strains from 52 surgical episodes were included. Infection was diagnosed by phenotyping in 38(73%) cases and by genotyping in 40(77%). The Kappa index was 0.59. Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV) and Negative Predictive Value (NPV) for phenotyping (vs. rep-PCR) were: 88%, 75%, 92%, and 64%. 5/14(36%) of cases not considered as true infections by phenotyping were diagnosed as infections with genotyping. In a subgroup of 203 strains from 41 surgical procedures with orthopaedic implants, the kappa index was 0.68. Sensitivity, Specificity, PPV, and NPV for phenotyping were: 93%, 73%, 90% and 80%. Again, 2/10 episodes in which CoNS were considered non-infective by phenotyping were diagnosed as infected by genotyping.

CONCLUSIONS

Rep-PCR genotyping can identify identical CoNS strains that differ in their phenotype and should be used as a complementary technique. One-third of infected cases may be misdiagnosed without genotypic analysis.

How to: molecular investigation of a hospital outbreak

BACKGROUND

Studying hospital outbreaks by using molecular tools, i.e. synthesizing the molecular epidemiology data to its appropriate clinical-epidemiologic context, is crucial in order to identify infection source, infer transmission dynamics, appropriately allocate prevention resources and implement control measures. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of pathogens has become the reference standard, as it is becoming more accessible and affordable. Consequently, sequencing of the full pathogen genome via WGS and major progress in fit-for-purpose genomic data analysis tools and interpretation is revolutionizing the field of outbreak investigations in hospitals. Metagenomics is an additional evolving field that might become commonly used in the future for outbreak investigations. Nevertheless, practitioners are frequently limited in terms of WGS or metagenomics, especially for local outbreak analyses, as a result of costs or logistical considerations, reduced or lack of locally available resources and/or expertise. As a result, traditional approaches, including pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, repetitive-element palindromic PCR and multilocus sequence typing, along with other typing methods, are still widely used.

AIMS

To provide practitioners with evidenced-based action plans for usage of the various typing techniques in order to investigate the molecular epidemiology of nosocomial outbreaks, of clinically significant pathogens in acute-care hospitals.

SOURCES

PubMed search with relevant keywords along with personal collection of relevant publications.

CONTENT

Representative case scenarios and critical review of the relevant scientific literature.

IMPLICATIONS

The review provides practical action plans to manage molecular epidemiologic investigations of outbreaks caused by clinically significant nosocomial pathogens, while prioritizing the use and timely integration of the various methodologies.

Pseudo-outbreak of Brevundimonas diminuta Attributed to Contamination of Culture Medium Supplement

We report an epidemiological investigation of a cluster of Brevundimonas diminuta isolates cultured from sterile sites. Inoculation of supplement medium yielded growth of B. diminuta. Molecular typing indicated likely contamination of the lot. No B. diminuta was further isolated after replacement of the supplement with a new lot number. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:598-601.