1
|
Giang A, Edwards MR, Fletcher SM, Gardner-Frolick R, Gryba R, Mathias JD, Venier-Cambron C, Anderies JM, Berglund E, Carley S, Erickson JS, Grubert E, Hadjimichael A, Hill J, Mayfield E, Nock D, Pikok KK, Saari RK, Samudio Lezcano M, Siddiqi A, Skerker JB, Tessum CW. Equity and modeling in sustainability science: Examples and opportunities throughout the process. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2024; 121:e2215688121. [PMID: 38498705 PMCID: PMC10990085 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2215688121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Equity is core to sustainability, but current interventions to enhance sustainability often fall short in adequately addressing this linkage. Models are important tools for informing action, and their development and use present opportunities to center equity in process and outcomes. This Perspective highlights progress in integrating equity into systems modeling in sustainability science, as well as key challenges, tensions, and future directions. We present a conceptual framework for equity in systems modeling, focused on its distributional, procedural, and recognitional dimensions. We discuss examples of how modelers engage with these different dimensions throughout the modeling process and from across a range of modeling approaches and topics, including water resources, energy systems, air quality, and conservation. Synthesizing across these examples, we identify significant advances in enhancing procedural and recognitional equity by reframing models as tools to explore pluralism in worldviews and knowledge systems; enabling models to better represent distributional inequity through new computational techniques and data sources; investigating the dynamics that can drive inequities by linking different modeling approaches; and developing more nuanced metrics for assessing equity outcomes. We also identify important future directions, such as an increased focus on using models to identify pathways to transform underlying conditions that lead to inequities and move toward desired futures. By looking at examples across the diverse fields within sustainability science, we argue that there are valuable opportunities for mutual learning on how to use models more effectively as tools to support sustainable and equitable futures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amanda Giang
- Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Morgan R. Edwards
- La Follette School of Public Affairs, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706
- Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Sarah M. Fletcher
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
- Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
| | - Rivkah Gardner-Frolick
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Rowenna Gryba
- Department of Statistics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
- Department of Geography, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
- Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BCV6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Jean-Denis Mathias
- Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, UR LISC, Centre de Clermont-Ferrand, AubièreF-63178, France
| | - Camille Venier-Cambron
- Department of Environmental Geography, Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - John M. Anderies
- School of Sustainability, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ85287
| | - Emily Berglund
- Department of Civil Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC27695
| | - Sanya Carley
- Kleinman Center for Energy Policy, Stuart Weitzman School of Design, Department of City Planning, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA19104
| | - Jacob Shimkus Erickson
- Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706
- Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI53706
| | - Emily Grubert
- Keough School of Global Affairs, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN46556
| | - Antonia Hadjimichael
- Department of Geosciences, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802
- Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, College of Earth and Mineral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA16802
| | - Jason Hill
- Department of Bioproducts and Biosystems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN55455
| | - Erin Mayfield
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH03755
| | - Destenie Nock
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA15213
| | - Kimberly Kivvaq Pikok
- International Arctic Research Center, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, AK99775
| | - Rebecca K. Saari
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ONN2L 3G1, Canada
| | - Mateo Samudio Lezcano
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA15213
| | - Afreen Siddiqi
- Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA02139
| | - Jennifer B. Skerker
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA94305
| | - Christopher W. Tessum
- Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL61801
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Velocci B. The history of sex research: Is "sex" a useful category? Cell 2024; 187:1343-1346. [PMID: 38490176 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/01/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
The history of sex research demonstrates an ongoing coexistence of multiple, conflicting meanings of sex. This history raises questions for scientists about the deployment of a research variable that lacks precision. Cross-disciplinary collaboration between scientists and science and technology studies (STS) scholars offers a way to find solutions to this problem.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beans Velocci
- Department of History and Sociology of Science, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McLaughlin JF, Brock KM, Gates I, Pethkar A, Piattoni M, Rossi A, Lipshutz SE. Multivariate Models of Animal Sex: Breaking Binaries Leads to a Better Understanding of Ecology and Evolution. Integr Comp Biol 2023; 63:891-906. [PMID: 37156506 PMCID: PMC10563656 DOI: 10.1093/icb/icad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023] Open
Abstract
"Sex" is often used to describe a suite of phenotypic and genotypic traits of an organism related to reproduction. However, these traits-gamete type, chromosomal inheritance, physiology, morphology, behavior, etc.-are not necessarily coupled, and the rhetorical collapse of variation into a single term elides much of the complexity inherent in sexual phenotypes. We argue that consideration of "sex" as a constructed category operating at multiple biological levels opens up new avenues for inquiry in our study of biological variation. We apply this framework to three case studies that illustrate the diversity of sex variation, from decoupling sexual phenotypes to the evolutionary and ecological consequences of intrasexual polymorphisms. We argue that instead of assuming binary sex in these systems, some may be better categorized as multivariate and nonbinary. Finally, we conduct a meta-analysis of terms used to describe diversity in sexual phenotypes in the scientific literature to highlight how a multivariate model of sex can clarify, rather than cloud, studies of sexual diversity within and across species. We argue that such an expanded framework of "sex" better equips us to understand evolutionary processes, and that as biologists, it is incumbent upon us to push back against misunderstandings of the biology of sexual phenotypes that enact harm on marginalized communities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F McLaughlin
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Kinsey M Brock
- Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, College of Natural Resources, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
- Department of Biology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA
| | - Isabella Gates
- Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
| | - Anisha Pethkar
- Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
| | - Marcus Piattoni
- Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
| | - Alexis Rossi
- Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
| | - Sara E Lipshutz
- Department of Biology, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL 60660, USA
- Department of Biology, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Smith EA, Smith JE, Codding BF. Toward an evolutionary ecology of (in)equality. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2023; 378:20220287. [PMID: 37381851 PMCID: PMC10291428 DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2022.0287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023] Open
Abstract
Inequality is increasingly recognized as a major problem in contemporary society. The causes and consequences of inequality in wealth and power have long been central concerns in the social sciences, whereas comparable research in biology has focused on dominance and reproductive skew. This theme issue builds on these existing research traditions, exploring ways they might enrich each other, with evolutionary ecology as a possibly unifying framework. Contributors investigate ways in which inequality is resisted or avoided and developed or imposed in societies of past and contemporary humans, as well as a variety of social mammals. Particular attention is paid to systematic, socially driven inequality in wealth (defined broadly) and the effects this has on differential power, health, survival and reproduction. Analyses include field studies, simulations, archaeological and ethnographic case studies, and analytical models. The results reveal similarities and divergences between human and non-human patterns in wealth, power and social dynamics. We draw on these insights to present a unifying conceptual framework for analysing the evolutionary ecology of (in)equality, with the hope of both understanding the past and improving our collective future. This article is part of the theme issue 'Evolutionary ecology of inequality'.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Alden Smith
- Department of Anthropology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jennifer E Smith
- Department of Biology, University of Wisconsin Eau Claire, 105 Garfield Avenue, Eau Claire, WI 54702, USA
| | - Brian F Codding
- Department of Anthropology and Archaeological Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
McLaughlin JF, Aguilar C, Bernstein JM, Navia-Gine WG, Cueto-Aparicio LE, Alarcon AC, Alarcon BD, Collier R, Takyar A, Vong SJ, López-Chong OG, Driver R, Loaiza JR, De León LF, Saltonstall K, Lipshutz SE, Arcila D, Brock KM, Miller MJ. Comparative phylogeography reveals widespread cryptic diversity driven by ecology in Panamanian birds. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023. [PMID: 36993716 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.26.525769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Widespread species often harbor unrecognized genetic diversity, and investigating the factors associated with such cryptic variation can help us better understand the forces driving diversification. Here, we identify potential cryptic species based on a comprehensive dataset of COI mitochondrial DNA barcodes from 2,333 individual Panamanian birds across 429 species, representing 391 (59%) of the 659 resident landbird species of the country, as well as opportunistically sampled waterbirds. We complement this dataset with additional publicly available mitochondrial loci, such as ND2 and cytochrome b, obtained from whole mitochondrial genomes from 20 taxa. Using barcode identification numbers (BINs), we find putative cryptic species in 19% of landbird species, highlighting hidden diversity in the relatively well-described avifauna of Panama. Whereas some of these mitochondrial divergence events corresponded with recognized geographic features that likely isolated populations, such as the Cordillera Central highlands, the majority (74%) of lowland splits were between eastern and western populations. The timing of these splits are not temporally coincident across taxa, suggesting that historical events, such as the formation of the Isthmus of Panama and Pleistocene climatic cycles, were not the primary drivers of cryptic diversification. Rather, we observed that forest species, understory species, insectivores, and strongly territorial species-all traits associated with lower dispersal ability-were all more likely to have multiple BINs in Panama, suggesting strong ecological associations with cryptic divergence. Additionally, hand-wing index, a proxy for dispersal capability, was significantly lower in species with multiple BINs, indicating that dispersal ability plays an important role in generating diversity in Neotropical birds. Together, these results underscore the need for evolutionary studies of tropical bird communities to consider ecological factors along with geographic explanations, and that even in areas with well-known avifauna, avian diversity may be substantially underestimated. LAY SUMMARY - What factors are common among bird species with cryptic diversity in Panama? What role do geography, ecology, phylogeographic history, and other factors play in generating bird diversity?- 19% of widely-sampled bird species form two or more distinct DNA barcode clades, suggesting widespread unrecognized diversity.- Traits associated with reduced dispersal ability, such as use of forest understory, high territoriality, low hand-wing index, and insectivory, were more common in taxa with cryptic diversity. Filogeografía comparada revela amplia diversidad críptica causada por la ecología en las aves de Panamá. RESUMEN Especies extendidas frecuentemente tiene diversidad genética no reconocida, y investigando los factores asociados con esta variación críptica puede ayudarnos a entender las fuerzas que impulsan la diversificación. Aquí, identificamos especies crípticas potenciales basadas en un conjunto de datos de códigos de barras de ADN mitocondrial de 2,333 individuos de aves de Panama en 429 especies, representando 391 (59%) de las 659 especies de aves terrestres residentes del país, además de algunas aves acuáticas muestreada de manera oportunista. Adicionalmente, complementamos estos datos con secuencias mitocondriales disponibles públicamente de otros loci, tal como ND2 o citocroma b, obtenidos de los genomas mitocondriales completos de 20 taxones. Utilizando los números de identificación de código de barras (en ingles: BINs), un sistema taxonómico numérico que proporcina una estimación imparcial de la diversidad potencial a nivel de especie, encontramos especies crípticas putativas en 19% de las especies de aves terrestres, lo que destaca la diversidad oculta en la avifauna bien descrita de Panamá. Aunque algunos de estos eventos de divergencia conciden con características geográficas que probablemente aislaron las poblaciones, la mayoría (74%) de la divergencia en las tierras bajas se encuentra entre las poblaciones orientales y occidentales. El tiempo de esta divergencia no coincidió entre los taxones, sugiriendo que eventos históricos tales como la formación del Istmo de Panamá y los ciclos climáticos del pleistoceno, no fueron los principales impulsores de la especiación. En cambio, observamos asociaciones fuertes entre las características ecológicas y la divergencia mitocondriale: las especies del bosque, sotobosque, con una dieta insectívora, y con territorialidad fuerte mostraton múltiple BINs probables. Adicionalmente, el índice mano-ala, que está asociado a la capacidad de dispersión, fue significativamente menor en las especies con BINs multiples, sugiriendo que la capacidad de dispersión tiene un rol importamente en la generación de la diversidad de las aves neotropicales. Estos resultos demonstran la necesidad de que estudios evolutivos de las comunidades de aves tropicales consideren los factores ecológicos en conjunto con las explicaciones geográficos. Palabras clave: biodiversidad tropical, biogeografía, códigos de barras, dispersión, especies crípticas.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
We organized this special issue to highlight new work and review recent advances at the cutting edge of 'wild quantitative genomics'. In this editorial, we will present some history of wild quantitative genetic and genomic studies, before discussing the main themes in the papers published in this special issue and highlighting the future outlook of this dynamic field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan E Johnston
- Institute of Ecology and Evolution, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3FL, UK
| | - Nancy Chen
- Department of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, 14627, NY, USA
| | - Emily B Josephs
- Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Smiley KO, Lipshutz SE, Kimmitt AA, DeVries MS, Cain KE, George EM, Covino KM. Beyond a biased binary: A perspective on the misconceptions, challenges, and implications of studying females in avian behavioral endocrinology. Front Physiol 2022; 13:970603. [PMID: 36213250 PMCID: PMC9532843 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.970603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
For decades, avian endocrinology has been informed by male perspectives and male-focused research, leaving significant gaps in our understanding of female birds. Male birds have been favored as research subjects because their reproductive behaviors are considered more conspicuous and their reproductive physiology is presumably less complex than female birds. However, female birds should not be ignored, as female reproductive behavior and physiology are essential for the propagation of all avian species. Endocrine research in female birds has made much progress in the last 20 years, but a substantial disparity in knowledge between male and female endocrinology persists. In this perspective piece, we provide examples of why ornithology has neglected female endocrinology, and we propose considerations for field and laboratory techniques to facilitate future studies. We highlight recent advances that showcase the importance of female avian endocrinology, and we challenge historic applications of an oversimplified, male-biased lens. We further provide examples of species for which avian behavior differs from the stereotypically described behaviors of male and female birds, warning investigators of the pitfalls in approaching endocrinology with a binary bias. We hope this piece will inspire investigators to engage in more comprehensive studies with female birds, to close the knowledge gap between the sexes, and to look beyond the binary when drawing conclusions about what is ‘male’ versus ‘female’ biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina O. Smiley
- Centre for Neuroendocrinology and Department of Anatomy, School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Center for Neuroendocrine Studies and Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, University of Massachusetts-Amherst, Amherst, MA, United States
- *Correspondence: Kristina O. Smiley,
| | - Sara E. Lipshutz
- Biology Department, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Abigail A. Kimmitt
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States
| | - M. Susan DeVries
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Whitewater, Whitewater, WI, United States
| | - Kristal E. Cain
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Elizabeth M. George
- Biology Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
| | - Kristen. M. Covino
- Biology Department, Loyola Marymount University, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|