• Reference Citation Analysis
  • v
  • v
  • Find an Article
Find an Article PDF (4616373)   Today's Articles (111)   Subscriber (49394)
For: Klein R, Aichinger H, Dierker J, Jansen JT, Joite-Barfuss S, Säbel M, Schulz-Wendtland R, Zoetelief J. Determination of average glandular dose with modern mammography units for two large groups of patients. Phys Med Biol 1997;42:651-71. [PMID: 9127443 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/42/4/004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Number Cited by Other Article(s)
1
Asadollahzadeh N, Razavi S, Zare MH. A survey on mean glandular dose in mammography examination and the factors affecting it in Shahid Sadoughi Hospital, Yazd, Iran. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2024;200:809-821. [PMID: 38811346 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncae121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 02/12/2024] [Accepted: 05/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
2
Marshall NW, Bosmans H. Performance evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis systems: physical methods and experimental data. Phys Med Biol 2022;67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac9a35] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
3
Evaluation of Breast Galactography Using Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Clinical Exploratory Study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021;11:diagnostics11112060. [PMID: 34829407 PMCID: PMC8622426 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11112060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]  Open
4
Aşlar E, Şahiner E, Polymeris GS, Meriç N. Feasibility of determining Entrance Surface Dose (ESD) and mean glandular dose (MGD) using OSL signal from BeO dosimeters in mammography. Radiat Phys Chem Oxf Engl 1993 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
5
Shinohara S, Araki F, Maeda M, Okamoto R, Nakamura M, Higashida Y. Indices for the evaluation of glandular dose heterogeneity in full-field digital mammography. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020;40:1429-1443. [PMID: 33120368 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/abc604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
6
Lee C, Han M, Baek J. Human observer performance on in-plane digital breast tomosynthesis images: Effects of reconstruction filters and data acquisition angles on signal detection. PLoS One 2020;15:e0229915. [PMID: 32163472 PMCID: PMC7067468 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0229915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]  Open
7
Chijoke WO, Adeniji-Sofoluwe AT, Jibiri NN. Evaluation of mean glandular dose and assessment of the risk of radiation induced carcinogenesis in women following screening mammography in a low resource setting. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH AND APPLIED SCIENCES 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jrras.2017.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
8
McLean D, Ryan L, Robertson L. Analysis of patient breast dose from a mammographic biopsy unit. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2019;42:193-199. [PMID: 30707352 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-019-00729-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/21/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
9
Depuydt J, Viaene T, Blondeel P, Roche N, Van den Broecke R, Thierens H, Vral A. DNA double strand breaks induced by low dose mammography X-rays in breast tissue: A pilot study. Oncol Lett 2018;16:3394-3400. [PMID: 30127940 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.9024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2017] [Accepted: 04/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]  Open
10
Acho SN, Boonzaier WPE, Nel IF. EXPOSURE PARAMETERS OF MAMMOGRAMS WITH AND WITHOUT MASS LESIONS FROM A SOUTH AFRICAN BREAST CARE CENTRE. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2017;177:348-355. [PMID: 28444247 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncx053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 04/04/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
11
Heggie JCP, Barnes P, Cartwright L, Diffey J, Tse J, Herley J, McLean ID, Thomson FJ, Grewal RK, Collins LT. Position paper: recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program V4.0. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2017;40:491-543. [PMID: 28914430 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-017-0583-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
12
Castillo-García M, Chevalier M, Garayoa J, Rodriguez-Ruiz A, García-Pinto D, Valverde J. Automated Breast Density Computation in Digital Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Influence on Mean Glandular Dose and BIRADS Density Categorization. Acad Radiol 2017;24:802-810. [PMID: 28214227 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2017.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2016] [Revised: 12/16/2016] [Accepted: 01/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
13
Geeraert N, Klausz R, Muller S, Bloch I, Bosmans H. Evaluation of exposure in mammography: limitations of average glandular dose and proposal of a new quantity. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2015;165:342-345. [PMID: 25897143 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncv069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
14
Kelaranta A, Toroi P, Timonen M, Komssi S, Kortesniemi M. Conformance of mean glandular dose from phantom and patient data in mammography. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2015;164:342-353. [PMID: 25114321 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncu261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2014] [Accepted: 07/18/2014] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
15
Leon SM, Brateman LF, Wagner LK. Characterization of scatter in digital mammography from use of Monte Carlo simulations and comparison to physical measurements. Med Phys 2014;41:111914. [PMID: 25370647 DOI: 10.1118/1.4894808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
16
Mittone A, Bravin A, Coan P. Radiation dose in breast CT imaging with monochromatic x-rays: simulation study of the influence of energy, composition and thickness. Phys Med Biol 2014;59:2199-217. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/9/2199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
17
Vedantham S, Shi L, Karellas A, O'Connell AM, Conover DL. Personalized estimates of radiation dose from dedicated breast CT in a diagnostic population and comparison with diagnostic mammography. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:7921-36. [PMID: 24165162 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/22/7921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
18
Borg M, Badr I, Royle GJ. Mammography equipment performance, image quality and mean glandular dose in Malta. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2013;156:168-183. [PMID: 23525916 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nct051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
19
Depuydt J, Baert A, Vandersickel V, Thierens H, Vral A. Relative biological effectiveness of mammography X-rays at the level of DNA and chromosomes in lymphocytes. Int J Radiat Biol 2013;89:532-8. [PMID: 23484479 DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2013.782447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
20
Myronakis ME, Zvelebil M, Darambara DG. Normalized mean glandular dose computation from mammography using GATE: a validation study. Phys Med Biol 2013;58:2247-65. [PMID: 23475310 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/7/2247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
21
O'Leary D, Rainford L. A comparison of mean glandular dose diagnostic reference levels within the all-digital Irish National Breast Screening Programme and the Irish Symptomatic Breast Services. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2013;153:300-308. [PMID: 22740646 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncs112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
22
Chen B, Wang Y, Sun X, Guo W, Zhao M, Cui G, Hu L, Li P, Ren Y, Feng J, Yu J. Analysis of patient dose in full field digital mammography. Eur J Radiol 2012;81:868-72. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.02.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2011] [Accepted: 02/10/2011] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
23
Thierry-Chef I, Simon SL, Weinstock RM, Kwon D, Linet MS. Reconstruction of absorbed doses to fibroglandular tissue of the breast of women undergoing mammography (1960 to the present). Radiat Res 2012;177:92-108. [PMID: 21988547 PMCID: PMC3876279 DOI: 10.1667/rr2241.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
24
Samei E, Saunders RS. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced breast tomosynthesis: optimization of beam quality for dose and image quality. Phys Med Biol 2011;56:6359-78. [PMID: 21908902 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/56/19/013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
25
Dong SL, Chu TC, Lin YC, Lan GY, Yeh YH, Chen S, Chuanga KS. Determination of equivalent breast phantoms for different age groups of Taiwanese women: an experimental approach. Med Phys 2011;38:4094-100. [PMID: 21859009 DOI: 10.1118/1.3591989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
26
Development of an Adjustable Model Breast for Mammographic Dosimetry Assessment in Taiwanese Women. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:W476-81. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.09.3700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
27
Dong SL, Su JL, Yeh YH, Chu TC, Lin YC, Chuang KS. Development of an imaging-planning program for screen/film and computed radiography mammography for breasts with short chest wall to nipple distance. Br J Radiol 2011;84:350-7. [PMID: 21123310 PMCID: PMC3473466 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/97507379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2009] [Revised: 04/09/2010] [Accepted: 04/29/2010] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
28
Maekawa M. Average glandular dose on the basis of quality control. Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi 2010;66:404-408. [PMID: 20625229 DOI: 10.6009/jjrt.66.404] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2023]
29
Dooley WC, Vargas HI, Fenn AJ, Tomaselli MB, Harness JK. Focused microwave thermotherapy for preoperative treatment of invasive breast cancer: a review of clinical studies. Ann Surg Oncol 2010;17:1076-93. [PMID: 20033319 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-009-0872-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2009] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
30
Bliznakova K, Kolitsi Z, Speller RD, Horrocks JA, Tromba G, Pallikarakis N. Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry. Med Phys 2010;37:1893-903. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3371693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
31
Yaffe MJ, Boone JM, Packard N, Alonzo-Proulx O, Huang SY, Peressotti CL, Al-Mayah A, Brock K. The myth of the 50-50 breast. Med Phys 2010;36:5437-43. [PMID: 20095256 DOI: 10.1118/1.3250863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 191] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
32
Saunders RS, Samei E, Lo JY, Baker JA. Can Compression Be Reduced for Breast Tomosynthesis? Monte Carlo Study on Mass and Microcalcification Conspicuity in Tomosynthesis. Radiology 2009;251:673-82. [PMID: 19474373 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2521081278] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
33
Leonard BE, Leonard VF. Mammogram and diagnostic X-rays--evidence of protective Bystander, Adaptive Response (AR) radio-protection and AR retention at high dose levels. Int J Radiat Biol 2009;84:885-99. [PMID: 19016137 DOI: 10.1080/09553000802460115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
34
Saunders RS, Samei E. The effect of breast compression on mass conspicuity in digital mammography. Med Phys 2008;35:4464-73. [PMID: 18975694 DOI: 10.1118/1.2977600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
35
Bor D, Tukel S, Olgar T, Toklu T, Aydin E, Akyol O. Investigation of mean glandular dose versus compressed breast thickness relationship for mammography. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2008;129:160-164. [PMID: 18420560 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncn140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
36
McLean ID, Heggie JCP, Herley J, Thomson FJ, Grewal RK. Interim recommendations for a digital mammography quality assurance program. AUSTRALASIAN PHYSICAL & ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE 2007;30:65-100. [PMID: 17682397 DOI: 10.1007/bf03178412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
37
Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. A comparative study of thoracic radiation doses from 64-slice cardiac CT. Br J Radiol 2007;80:537-44. [PMID: 17704315 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/34603706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
38
Smathers RL, Boone JM, Lee LJ, Berns EA, Miller RA, Wright AM. Radiation Dose Reduction for Augmentation Mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:1414-21. [PMID: 17449790 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.06.0998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
39
Koutalonis M, Delis H, Spyrou G, Costaridou L, Tzanakos G, Panayiotakis G. Monte Carlo generated conversion factors for the estimation of average glandular dose in contact and magnification mammography. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:5539-48. [PMID: 17047268 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/21/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
40
Gennaro G, di Maggio C. Dose comparison between screen/film and full-field digital mammography. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2559-66. [PMID: 16733678 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0314-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2006] [Revised: 04/05/2006] [Accepted: 04/24/2006] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
41
Zoetelief J, Veldkamp WJH, Thijssen MAO, Jansen JTM. Glandularity and mean glandular dose determined for individual women at four regional breast cancer screening units in the Netherlands. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:1807-17. [PMID: 16552106 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/7/012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
42
Ng KH, Jamal N, DeWerd L. Global quality control perspective for the physical and technical aspects of screen-film mammography--image quality and radiation dose. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2006;121:445-51. [PMID: 16709704 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncl051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
43
Jansen JTM, Veldkamp WJH, Thijssen MAO, van Woudenberg S, Zoetelief J. Method for determination of the mean fraction of glandular tissue in individual female breasts using mammography. Phys Med Biol 2005;50:5953-67. [PMID: 16333166 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/24/013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
44
Delis H, Spyrou G, Panayiotakis G, Tzanakos G. DOSIS: a Monte Carlo simulation program for dose related studies in mammography. Eur J Radiol 2005;54:371-6. [PMID: 15899338 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2004.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2004] [Revised: 07/27/2004] [Accepted: 07/29/2004] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
45
Assiamah M, Nam TL, Keddy RJ. Comparison of mammography radiation dose values obtained from direct incident air kerma measurements with values from measured X-ray spectral data. Appl Radiat Isot 2005;62:551-60. [PMID: 15701409 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2004.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2004] [Accepted: 09/16/2004] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
46
Smans K, Bosmans H, Xiao M, Carton AK, Marchal G. Towards a proposition of a diagnostic (dose) reference level for mammographic acquisitions in breast screening measurements in Belgium. RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY 2005;117:321-6. [PMID: 16464839 DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nci760] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
47
Chevalier M, Morán P, Ten JI, Fernández Soto JM, Cepeda T, Vañó E. Patient dose in digital mammography. Med Phys 2004;31:2471-9. [PMID: 15487727 DOI: 10.1118/1.1784591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]  Open
48
Warren-Forward HM, Duggan L. Towardsin vivoTLD dosimetry in mammography. Br J Radiol 2004;77:426-32. [PMID: 15121707 DOI: 10.1259/bjr/91138314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]  Open
49
Jamal N, Ng KH, McLean D, Looi LM, Moosa F. Mammographic breast glandularity in Malaysian women: data derived from radiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:713-7. [PMID: 14975974 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.182.3.1820713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
50
Pani S, Longo R, Dreossi D, Montanari F, Olivo A, Arfelli F, Bergamaschi A, Poropat P, Rigon L, Zanconati F, Dalla Palma L, Castelli E. Breast tomography with synchrotron radiation: preliminary results. Phys Med Biol 2004;49:1739-54. [PMID: 15152928 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/49/9/011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
PrevPage 1 of 2 12Next
© 2004-2024 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA