1
|
An C, Zhang W, Dai Z, Li J, Yang X, Wang J, Nie Y. Optimizing focused very-high-energy electron beams for radiation therapy based on Monte Carlo simulation. Sci Rep 2024; 14:27495. [PMID: 39528582 PMCID: PMC11554818 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-79187-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Accepted: 11/06/2024] [Indexed: 11/16/2024] Open
Abstract
A TOPAS-based optimization program has been developed to precisely concentrate the dose of focused very-high-energy electron (VHEE) beams on deep-seated targets. This is accomplished by optimizing the magnetic gradients, positions, and number of quadrupole magnets within TOPAS. Using only three quadrupole magnets, the program focuses 250 MeV VHEE beams to achieve a maximum dose position deeper than 17 cm, while maintaining entrance and exit doses within 25% and limiting the lateral dimensions to ≤ 1 cm at the maximum dose location. The linear relationship between the magnetic gradient of the last quadrupole magnet and the maximum dose position enables dose location adjustments through gradient variation. Multiple positions were validated in TOPAS with errors within 1%. The spread-out electron peak (SOEP) is achieved by combining two VHEE beams with different maximum dose positions using the differential evolution method, covering a target depth of 12-17 cm and attaining a dose flatness better than 99%. This pioneering program imposes constraints on entrance dose, exit dose, maximum dose position, and the lateral dimensions of dose deposition at the maximum dose position within phantom. This program may be a promising tool in the applications of focused VHEE in highly conformal treatment plans based on TOPAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaofan An
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China
| | - Zeyi Dai
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jia Li
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China
| | - Xiong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430060, Hubei Province, China
| | - Jike Wang
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China
| | - Yuancun Nie
- The Institute for Advanced Studies, Wuhan University, Wuhan, 430072, Hubei Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Orobeti S, Sima LE, Porosnicu I, Diplasu C, Giubega G, Cojocaru G, Ungureanu R, Dobrea C, Serbanescu M, Mihalcea A, Stancu E, Staicu CE, Jipa F, Bran A, Axente E, Sandel S, Zamfirescu M, Tiseanu I, Sima F. First in vitro cell co-culture experiments using laser-induced high-energy electron FLASH irradiation for the development of anti-cancer therapeutic strategies. Sci Rep 2024; 14:14866. [PMID: 38937505 PMCID: PMC11211417 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-65137-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/17/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation delivery at ultrahigh dose rates (UHDRs) has potential for use as a new anticancer therapeutic strategy. The FLASH effect induced by UHDR irradiation has been shown to maintain antitumour efficacy with a reduction in normal tissue toxicity; however, the FLASH effect has been difficult to demonstrate in vitro. The objective to demonstrate the FLASH effect in vitro is challenging, aiming to reveal a differential response between cancer and normal cells to further identify cell molecular mechanisms. New high-intensity petawatt laser-driven accelerators can deliver very high-energy electrons (VHEEs) at dose rates as high as 1013 Gy/s in very short pulses (10-13 s). Here, we present the first in vitro experiments carried out on cancer cells and normal non-transformed cells concurrently exposed to laser-plasma accelerated (LPA) electrons. Specifically, melanoma cancer cells and normal melanocyte co-cultures grown on chamber slides were simultaneously irradiated with LPA electrons. A non-uniform dose distribution on the cell cultures was revealed by Gafchromic films placed behind the chamber slide supporting the cells. In parallel experiments, cell co-cultures were exposed to pulsed X-ray irradiation, which served as positive controls for radiation-induced nuclear DNA double-strand breaks. By measuring the impact on discrete areas of the cell monolayers, the greatest proportion of the damaged DNA-containing nuclei was attained by the LPA electrons at a cumulative dose one order of magnitude lower than the dose obtained by pulsed X-ray irradiation. Interestingly, in certain discrete areas, we observed that LPA electron exposure had a different effect on the DNA damage in healthy normal human epidermal melanocyte (NHEM) cells than in A375 melanoma cells; here, the normal cells were less affected by the LPA exposure than cancer cells. This result is the first in vitro demonstration of a differential response of tumour and normal cells exposed to FLASH irradiation and may contribute to the development of new cell culture strategies to explore fundamental understanding of FLASH-induced cell effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefana Orobeti
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry of the Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Livia Elena Sima
- Department of Molecular Cell Biology, Institute of Biochemistry of the Romanian Academy, 296 Splaiul Independentei, 060031, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioana Porosnicu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Constantin Diplasu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Georgiana Giubega
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Gabriel Cojocaru
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Razvan Ungureanu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Cosmin Dobrea
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Mihai Serbanescu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Alexandru Mihalcea
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Elena Stancu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Cristina Elena Staicu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Florin Jipa
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Alexandra Bran
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Emanuel Axente
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Simion Sandel
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Marian Zamfirescu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Ion Tiseanu
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania
| | - Felix Sima
- National Institute for Laser, Plasma and Radiation Physics (INFLPR), 409 Atomistilor Street, RO-077125, Magurele, Romania.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Desorgher L, Veres I, Bratel A, Landström E, Engwall E, Herrera FG, Ozsahin EM, Bourhis J, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Very high-energy electron therapy as light-particle alternative to transmission proton FLASH therapy - An evaluation of dosimetric performances. Radiother Oncol 2024; 194:110177. [PMID: 38378075 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Clinical translation of FLASH-radiotherapy (RT) to deep-seated tumours is still a technological challenge. One proposed solution consists of using ultra-high dose rate transmission proton (TP) beams of about 200-250 MeV to irradiate the tumour with the flat entrance of the proton depth-dose profile. This work evaluates the dosimetric performance of very high-energy electron (VHEE)-based RT (50-250 MeV) as a potential alternative to TP-based RT for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect. METHODS Basic physics characteristics of VHEE and TP beams were compared utilizing Monte Carlo simulations in water. A VHEE-enabled research treatment planning system was used to evaluate the plan quality achievable with VHEE beams of different energies, compared to 250 MeV TP beams for a glioblastoma, an oesophagus, and a prostate cancer case. RESULTS Like TP, VHEE above 100 MeV can treat targets with roughly flat (within ± 20 %) depth-dose distributions. The achievable dosimetric target conformity and adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) sparing is consequently driven for both modalities by their lateral beam penumbrae. Electron beams of 400[500] MeV match the penumbra of 200[250] MeV TP beams and penumbra is increased for lower electron energies. For the investigated patient cases, VHEE plans with energies of 150 MeV and above achieved a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of 250 MeV TP plans. For the glioblastoma and the oesophagus case, although having a decreased conformity, even 100 MeV VHEE plans provided a similar target coverage and OAR sparing compared to TP. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based FLASH-RT using sufficiently high beam energies may provide a lighter-particle alternative to TP-based FLASH-RT with comparable dosimetric plan quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Izabella Veres
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | - Fernanda G Herrera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Clements N, Esplen N, Bateman J, Robertson C, Dosanjh M, Korysko P, Farabolini W, Corsini R, Bazalova-Carter M. Mini-GRID radiotherapy on the CLEAR very-high-energy electron beamline: collimator optimization, film dosimetry, and Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:055003. [PMID: 38295408 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad247d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Spatially-fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) delivered with a very-high-energy electron (VHEE) beam and a mini-GRID collimator was investigated to achieve synergistic normal tissue-sparing through spatial fractionation and the FLASH effect.Approach.A tungsten mini-GRID collimator for delivering VHEE SFRT was optimized using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. Peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs), depths of convergence (DoCs, PVDR ≤ 1.1), and peak and valley doses in a water phantom from a simulated 150 MeV VHEE source were evaluated. Collimator thickness, hole width, and septal width were varied to determine an optimal value for each parameter that maximized PVDR and DoC. The optimized collimator (20 mm thick rectangular prism with a 15 mm × 15 mm face with a 7 × 7 array of 0.5 mm holes separated by 1.1 mm septa) was 3D-printed and used for VHEE irradiations with the CERN linear electron accelerator for research beam. Open beam and mini-GRID irradiations were performed at 140, 175, and 200 MeV and dose was recorded with radiochromic films in a water tank. PVDR, central-axis (CAX) and valley dose rates and DoCs were evaluated.Main results.Films demonstrated peak and valley dose rates on the order of 100 s of MGy/s, which could promote FLASH-sparing effects. Across the three energies, PVDRs of 2-4 at 13 mm depth and DoCs between 39 and 47 mm were achieved. Open beam and mini-GRID MC simulations were run to replicate the film results at 200 MeV. For the mini-GRID irradiations, the film CAX dose was on average 15% higher, the film valley dose was 28% higher, and the film PVDR was 15% lower than calculated by MC.Significance.Ultimately, the PVDRs and DoCs were determined to be too low for a significant potential for SFRT tissue-sparing effects to be present, particularly at depth. Further beam delivery optimization and investigations of new means of spatial fractionation are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Clements
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Nolan Esplen
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC, Canada
| | - Joseph Bateman
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | - Manjit Dosanjh
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Pierre Korysko
- Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- CERN, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Traneus E, Vallet V, Desorgher L, Ozsahin EM, Bochud F, Bourhis J, Moeckli R. 3D-conformal very-high energy electron therapy as candidate modality for FLASH-RT: A treatment planning study for glioblastoma and lung cancer. Med Phys 2023; 50:5745-5756. [PMID: 37427669 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pre-clinical ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) electron irradiations on time scales of 100 ms have demonstrated a remarkable sparing of brain and lung tissues while retaining tumor efficacy when compared to conventional dose rate irradiations. While clinically-used gantries and intensity modulation techniques are too slow to match such time scales, novel very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) radiotherapy (RT) devices using 3D-conformed broad VHEE beams are designed to deliver UHDR treatments that fulfill these timing requirements. PURPOSE To assess the dosimetric plan quality obtained using VHEE-based 3D-conformal RT (3D-CRT) for treatments of glioblastoma and lung cancer patients and compare the resulting treatment plans to those delivered by standard-of-care intensity modulated photon RT (IMRT) techniques. METHODS Seven glioblastoma patients and seven lung cancer patients were planned with VHEE-based 3D-CRT using 3 to 16 coplanar beams with equidistant angular spacing and energies of 100 and 200 MeV using a forward planning approach. Dose distributions, dose-volume histograms, coverage (V95% ) and homogeneity (HI98% ) for the planning target volume (PTV), as well as near-maximum doses (D2% ) and mean doses (Dmean ) for organs-at-risk (OAR) were evaluated and compared to clinical IMRT plans. RESULTS Mean differences of V95% and HI98% of all VHEE plans were within 2% or better of the IMRT reference plans. Glioblastoma plan dose metrics obtained with VHEE configurations of 200 MeV and 3-16 beams were either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the clinical IMRT reference plans. All OAR plan dose metrics evaluated for VHEE plans created using 5 beams of 100 MeV were either not significantly different or within 3% on average, except for Dmean for the body, Dmean for the brain, D2% for the brain stem, and D2% for the chiasm, which were significantly increased by 1, 2, 6, and 8 Gy, respectively (however below clinical constraints). Similarly, the dose metrics for lung cancer patients were also either not significantly different or were significantly improved compared to the reference plans for VHEE configurations with 200 MeV and 5 to 16 beams with the exception of D2% and Dmean to the spinal canal (however below clinical constraints). For the lung cancer cases, the VHEE configurations using 100 MeV or only 3 beams resulted in significantly worse dose metrics for some OAR. Differences in dose metrics were, however, strongly patient-specific and similar for some patient cases. CONCLUSIONS VHEE-based 3D-CRT may deliver conformal treatments to simple, mostly convex target shapes in the brain and the thorax with a limited number of critical adjacent OAR using a limited number of beams (as low as 3 to 7). Using such treatment techniques, a dosimetric plan quality comparable to that of standard-of-care IMRT can be achieved. Hence, from a treatment planning perspective, 3D-conformal UHDR VHEE treatments delivered on time scales of 100 ms represent a promising candidate technique for the clinical transfer of the FLASH effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean-François Germond
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Veronique Vallet
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Laurent Desorgher
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Esat Mahmut Ozsahin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jean Bourhis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rahman M, Trigilio A, Franciosini G, Moeckli R, Zhang R, Böhlen TT. FLASH radiotherapy treatment planning and models for electron beams. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:210-221. [PMID: 35964763 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The FLASH effect designates normal tissue sparing at ultra-high dose rate (UHDR, >40 Gy/s) compared to conventional dose rate (∼0.1 Gy/s) irradiation while maintaining tumour control and has the potential to improve the therapeutic ratio of radiotherapy (RT). UHDR high-energy electron (HEE, 4-20 MeV) beams are currently a mainstay for investigating the clinical potential of FLASH RT for superficial tumours. In the future very-high energy electron (VHEE, 50-250 MeV) UHDR beams may be used to treat deep-seated tumours. UHDR HEE treatment planning focused at its initial stage on accurate dosimetric modelling of converted and dedicated UHDR electron RT devices for the clinical transfer of FLASH RT. VHEE treatment planning demonstrated promising dosimetric performance compared to clinical photon RT techniques in silico and was used to evaluate and optimise the design of novel VHEE RT devices. Multiple metrics and models have been proposed for a quantitative description of the FLASH effect in treatment planning, but an improved experimental characterization and understanding of the FLASH effect is needed to allow for an accurate and validated modelling of the effect in treatment planning. The importance of treatment planning for electron FLASH RT will augment as the field moves forward to treat more complex clinical indications and target sites. In this review, TPS developments in HEE and VHEE are presented considering beam models, characteristics, and future FLASH applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahbubur Rahman
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA
| | - Antonio Trigilio
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Gaia Franciosini
- Physics Department, "La Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy; INFN National Institute of Nuclear Physics, Rome Section, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland.
| | - Rongxiao Zhang
- Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA; Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| | - Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Farr J, Grilj V, Malka V, Sudharsan S, Schippers M. Ultra‐High dose rate radiation production and delivery systems intended for FLASH. Med Phys 2022; 49:4875-4911. [PMID: 35403262 PMCID: PMC9544515 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15659] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2022] [Accepted: 03/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Higher dose rates, a trend for radiotherapy machines, can be beneficial in shortening treatment times for radiosurgery and mitigating the effects of motion. Recently, even higher doses (e.g., 100 times greater) have become targeted because of their potential to generate the FLASH effect (FE). We refer to these physical dose rates as ultra‐high (UHDR). The complete relationship between UHDR and the FE is unknown. But UHDR systems are needed to explore the relationship further and to deliver clinical UHDR treatments, where indicated. Despite the challenging set of unknowns, the authors seek to make reasonable assumptions to probe how existing and developing technology can address the UHDR conditions needed to provide beam generation capable of producing the FE in preclinical and clinical applications. As a preface, this paper discusses the known and unknown relationships between UHDR and the FE. Based on these, different accelerator and ionizing radiation types are then discussed regarding the relevant UHDR needs. The details of UHDR beam production are discussed for existing and potential future systems such as linacs, cyclotrons, synchrotrons, synchrocyclotrons, and laser accelerators. In addition, various UHDR delivery mechanisms are discussed, along with required developments in beam diagnostics and dose control systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Farr
- Applications of Detectors and Accelerators to Medicine Meyrin 1217 Switzerland
| | - Veljko Grilj
- Lausanne University Hospital Lausanne 1011 Switzerland
| | - Victor Malka
- Weizmann Institute of Science Rehovot 7610001 Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ronga MG, Cavallone M, Patriarca A, Leite AM, Loap P, Favaudon V, Créhange G, De Marzi L. Back to the Future: Very High-Energy Electrons (VHEEs) and Their Potential Application in Radiation Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4942. [PMID: 34638424 PMCID: PMC8507836 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of innovative approaches that would reduce the sensitivity of healthy tissues to irradiation while maintaining the efficacy of the treatment on the tumor is of crucial importance for the progress of the efficacy of radiotherapy. Recent methodological developments and innovations, such as scanned beams, ultra-high dose rates, and very high-energy electrons, which may be simultaneously available on new accelerators, would allow for possible radiobiological advantages of very short pulses of ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) therapy for radiation therapy to be considered. In particular, very high-energy electron (VHEE) radiotherapy, in the energy range of 100 to 250 MeV, first proposed in the 2000s, would be particularly interesting both from a ballistic and biological point of view for the establishment of this new type of irradiation technique. In this review, we examine and summarize the current knowledge on VHEE radiotherapy and provide a synthesis of the studies that have been published on various experimental and simulation works. We will also consider the potential for VHEE therapy to be translated into clinical contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Grazia Ronga
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
- Thales AVS Microwave & Imaging Sub-Systems, 78141 Vélizy-Villacoublay, France
| | - Marco Cavallone
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
| | - Amelia Maia Leite
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
- INSERM LITO U1288, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Pierre Loap
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
| | - Vincent Favaudon
- INSERM U 1021-CNRS UMR 3347, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, 91898 Orsay, France;
| | - Gilles Créhange
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d’Orsay, Department of Radiation Oncology, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, 91898 Orsay, France; (M.G.R.); (M.C.); (A.P.); (A.M.L.); (P.L.); (G.C.)
- INSERM LITO U1288, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, 91898 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Böhlen TT, Germond JF, Traneus E, Bourhis J, Vozenin MC, Bailat C, Bochud F, Moeckli R. Characteristics of very high-energy electron beams for the irradiation of deep-seated targets. Med Phys 2021; 48:3958-3967. [PMID: 33884618 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Revised: 03/07/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Driven by advances in accelerator technology and the potential of exploiting the FLASH effect for the treatment of deep-seated targets (>5 cm), there is an active interest in the construction of devices to deliver very high-energy electron (VHEE) beams for radiation therapy. The application of novel VHEE devices, however, requires an assessment of the tradeoffs between the different beam parameter choices including beam energies, beam divergences, and maximal field sizes. This study systematically examines the dosimetric beam properties of VHEE beams, determining their clinical usefulness while marking their limits of applications for different beam configurations. METHODS We performed Monte Carlo simulations of the dose distributions of electron beams for different energies (25-250 MeV), source-to-surface distances (SSD) (50 cm, 100 cm, parallel), and field sizes (2 cm2 × 2 cm2 to 15 cm2 × 15 cm2 ) in water using a research version of the RayStation treatment planning system (RaySearch Labs 9A IONPG). The beam was simulated using a monoenergetic point source and perfect collimation. Central axis percentage depth dose (PDD) and transverse dose profiles at multiple depths were evaluated and compared to those of MV photon beams. Profile characteristics including therapeutic range (TR) at 90%, proximal fall-off (PFO) at 90%, lateral penumbra (LP) at 90%-10%, and field width (FW) at 90% were obtained. RESULTS Very high-energy electrons beams with SSD 100 cm and parallel beams (infinite SSD) exhibit a linear to near-linear increase of TR as a function of energy in the simulated energy range and reach values well beyond the typical depths of lesions encountered in clinics (<20 cm). Their TR show a marked field size dependence only for field sizes <10 cm2 × 10 cm2 . For VHEE beams with SSD 50 cm, TR are largely reduced (4-8 cm). For beam energies >150 MeV with large SSD (>100 cm), for many configurations, there is no substantial difference in PDD when adding an opposed beam. This may potentially reduce the number of VHEE beams needed for treatment by a factor of two compared to a treatment using lower energies and lower SSD. In order to cover deep-seated targets homogeneously, VHEE devices with a parallel beam must provide a maximum field size up to several centimeters larger than the tumor size. For the investigated diverging beams, there is not such a significant field width reduction with depth for larger fields as it is compensated by divergence. Penumbrae of VHEE beams are smaller than those of clinical MV photon beams for lower depths (<5 cm) but increase quickly for larger depths. There is only a relatively small dependence of penumbra on the SSD of the beam. CONCLUSIONS The findings presented in this study assess the performance of VHEE beams and offer a first estimate of treatment indications and tradeoffs for a given design of a VHEE device. SSD >100 cm results in clinically more favorable PDD. Beam energies of 100 MeV and above are needed to cover common tumors (5-15 cm in-depth) conformally. Higher energies provide an additional benefit specifically for small and deep-seated lesions due to their reduced lateral penumbrae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Till Tobias Böhlen
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Jean Bourhis
- Radiation-oncology department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Radiation-oncology department, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Claude Bailat
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - François Bochud
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphaël Moeckli
- Institute of Radiation Physics, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schüller A, Heinrich S, Fouillade C, Subiel A, De Marzi L, Romano F, Peier P, Trachsel M, Fleta C, Kranzer R, Caresana M, Salvador S, Busold S, Schönfeld A, McEwen M, Gomez F, Solc J, Bailat C, Linhart V, Jakubek J, Pawelke J, Borghesi M, Kapsch RP, Knyziak A, Boso A, Olsovcova V, Kottler C, Poppinga D, Ambrozova I, Schmitzer CS, Rossomme S, Vozenin MC. The European Joint Research Project UHDpulse – Metrology for advanced radiotherapy using particle beams with ultra-high pulse dose rates. Phys Med 2020; 80:134-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.09.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Revised: 08/17/2020] [Accepted: 09/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
|
11
|
Labate L, Palla D, Panetta D, Avella F, Baffigi F, Brandi F, Di Martino F, Fulgentini L, Giulietti A, Köster P, Terzani D, Tomassini P, Traino C, Gizzi LA. Toward an effective use of laser-driven very high energy electrons for radiotherapy: Feasibility assessment of multi-field and intensity modulation irradiation schemes. Sci Rep 2020; 10:17307. [PMID: 33057078 PMCID: PMC7560873 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-74256-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy with very high energy electrons has been investigated for a couple of decades as an effective approach to improve dose distribution compared to conventional photon-based radiotherapy, with the recent intriguing potential of high dose-rate irradiation. Its practical application to treatment has been hindered by the lack of hospital-scale accelerators. High-gradient laser-plasma accelerators (LPA) have been proposed as a possible platform, but no experiments so far have explored the feasibility of a clinical use of this concept. We show the results of an experimental study aimed at assessing dose deposition for deep seated tumours using advanced irradiation schemes with an existing LPA source. Measurements show control of localized dose deposition and modulation, suitable to target a volume at depths in the range from 5 to 10 cm with mm resolution. The dose delivered to the target was up to 1.6 Gy, delivered with few hundreds of shots, limited by secondary components of the LPA accelerator. Measurements suggest that therapeutic doses within localized volumes can already be obtained with existing LPA technology, calling for dedicated pre-clinical studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Labate
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Daniele Palla
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Daniele Panetta
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federico Avella
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Federica Baffigi
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fernando Brandi
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Fabio Di Martino
- Unità Operativa di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienza Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fulgentini
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Antonio Giulietti
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Petra Köster
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Davide Terzani
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
- Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBL, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Paolo Tomassini
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudio Traino
- Unità Operativa di Fisica Sanitaria, Azienza Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Leonida A Gizzi
- Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto Nazionale di Ottica, Pisa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Focused very high-energy electron beams as a novel radiotherapy modality for producing high-dose volumetric elements. Sci Rep 2019; 9:10837. [PMID: 31346184 PMCID: PMC6658670 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-46630-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2018] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The increased inertia of very high-energy electrons (VHEEs) due to relativistic effects reduces scattering and enables irradiation of deep-seated tumours. However, entrance and exit doses are high for collimated or diverging beams. Here, we perform a study based on Monte Carlo simulations of focused VHEE beams in a water phantom, showing that dose can be concentrated into a small, well-defined volumetric element, which can be shaped or scanned to treat deep-seated tumours. The dose to surrounding tissue is distributed over a larger volume, which reduces peak surface and exit doses for a single beam by more than one order of magnitude compared with a collimated beam.
Collapse
|
13
|
Schüler E, Wang L, Loo BW, Maxim PG. Conical beam geometry intensity-modulated radiation therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 64:125014. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab246f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
|
14
|
Dosimetric evaluation of a novel electron–photon mixed beam, produced by a medical linear accelerator. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2018. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396917000711] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
AbstractAimThis study deals with the characteristics of simultaneous photon and electron beams in homogenous and inhomogeneous phantoms by experimental and Monte Carlo dosimetry, for therapeutic purposes. Materials and methods: Both 16 and 20 MeV high-energy electron beams were used as the original beam to strike perforated lead sheets to produce the mixed beam. The dosimetry results were achieved by measurement in an ion chamber in a water phantom and film dosimetry in a Perspex nasal phantom, and then compared with those calculated through a simulation approach. To evaluate two-dimensional dose distribution in the inhomogeneous medium, the dose–area histogram was obtained.ResultsThe highest percentage of photon contribution in mixed beam was found to be 36% for 2-mm thickness of lead layer with holes diameter of 0·2 cm for a 20 MeV primary electron energy. For small fields, the percentage depth dose parameters variations were found to be similar to pure electron beam within ±2%. The most feasible flatness in beam profile was 11% for pure electron and 7% for the mixed beam. Penumbra changes as function of depth was about ten times better than in pure electron field.ConclusionsThe results present some dosimetric advantages that can make this study a platform for the production of simultaneous mixed beams in future linear accelerators (LINACs), which through redesign of the LINAC head, which could lead to setup error reduction and a decrease of intra-fractional tumour cells repair.
Collapse
|
15
|
Subiel A, Moskvin V, Welsh GH, Cipiccia S, Reboredo D, DesRosiers C, Jaroszynski DA. Challenges of dosimetry of ultra-short pulsed very high energy electron beams. Phys Med 2017; 42:327-331. [PMID: 28506453 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2016] [Revised: 04/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/30/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Very high energy electrons (VHEE) in the range from 100 to 250MeV have the potential of becoming an alternative modality in radiotherapy because of their improved dosimetric properties compared with 6-20MV photons generated by clinical linear accelerators (LINACs). VHEE beams have characteristics unlike any other beams currently used for radiotherapy: femtosecond to picosecond duration electron bunches, which leads to very high dose per pulse, and energies that exceed that currently used in clinical applications. Dosimetry with conventional online detectors, such as ionization chambers or diodes, is a challenge due to non-negligible ion recombination effects taking place in the sensitive volumes of these detectors. FLUKA and Geant4 Monte Carlo (MC) codes have been employed to study the temporal and spectral evolution of ultrashort VHEE beams in a water phantom. These results are complemented by ion recombination measurements employing an IBA CC04 ionization chamber for a 165MeV VHEE beam. For comparison, ion recombination has also been measured using the same chamber with a conventional 20MeV electron beam. This work demonstrates that the IBA CC04 ionization chamber exhibits significant ion recombination and is therefore not suitable for dosimetry of ultrashort pulsed VHEE beams applying conventional correction factors. Further study is required to investigate the applicability of ion chambers in VHEE dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Subiel
- National Physical Laboratory, Medical Radiation Science, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK.
| | - Vadim Moskvin
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105, USA
| | - Gregor H Welsh
- Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK
| | - Silvia Cipiccia
- Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK; Diamond Light Source, Harwell Science and Innovation Campus, Fermi Avenue, Didcot OX11 0DE, UK
| | - David Reboredo
- Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK
| | - Colleen DesRosiers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA
| | - Dino A Jaroszynski
- Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Schüler E, Eriksson K, Hynning E, Hancock SL, Hiniker SM, Bazalova‐Carter M, Wong T, Le Q, Loo BW, Maxim PG. Very high‐energy electron (
VHEE
) beams in radiation therapy; Treatment plan comparison between
VHEE
,
VMAT
, and
PPBS. Med Phys 2017; 44:2544-2555. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2016] [Revised: 03/15/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Emil Schüler
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | | | | | - Steven L. Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Susan M. Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | | | - Tony Wong
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance Proton Therapy Center Seattle WA USA
| | - Quynh‐Thu Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Billy W. Loo
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| | - Peter G. Maxim
- Department of Radiation Oncology Stanford School of Medicine Stanford University Stanford CA USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Palma B, Bazalova-Carter M, Hårdemark B, Hynning E, Qu B, Loo BW, Maxim PG. Assessment of the quality of very high-energy electron radiotherapy planning. Radiother Oncol 2016; 119:154-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2016.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
18
|
Subiel A, Moskvin V, Welsh GH, Cipiccia S, Reboredo D, Evans P, Partridge M, DesRosiers C, Anania MP, Cianchi A, Mostacci A, Chiadroni E, Di Giovenale D, Villa F, Pompili R, Ferrario M, Belleveglia M, Di Pirro G, Gatti G, Vaccarezza C, Seitz B, Isaac RC, Brunetti E, Wiggins SM, Ersfeld B, Islam MR, Mendonca MS, Sorensen A, Boyd M, Jaroszynski DA. Dosimetry of very high energy electrons (VHEE) for radiotherapy applications: using radiochromic film measurements and Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2014; 59:5811-29. [PMID: 25207591 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/19/5811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Very high energy electrons (VHEE) in the range from 100-250 MeV have the potential of becoming an alternative modality in radiotherapy because of their improved dosimetry properties compared with MV photons from contemporary medical linear accelerators. Due to the need for accurate dosimetry of small field size VHEE beams we have performed dose measurements using EBT2 Gafchromic® film. Calibration of the film has been carried out for beams of two different energy ranges: 20 MeV and 165 MeV from conventional radio frequency linear accelerators. In addition, EBT2 film has been used for dose measurements with 135 MeV electron beams produced by a laser-plasma wakefield accelerator. The dose response measurements and percentage depth dose profiles have been compared with calculations carried out using the general-purpose FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport code. The impact of induced radioactivity on film response for VHEEs has been evaluated using the MC simulations. A neutron yield of the order of 10(-5) neutrons cm(-2) per incident electron has been estimated and induced activity due to radionuclide production is found to have a negligible effect on total dose deposition and film response. Neutron and proton contribution to the equivalent doses are negligible for VHEE. The study demonstrates that EBT2 Gafchromic film is a reliable dosimeter that can be used for dosimetry of VHEE. The results indicate an energy-independent response of the dosimeter for 20 MeV and 165 MeV electron beams and has been found to be suitable for dosimetry of VHEE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Subiel
- Department of Physics, Scottish Universities Physics Alliance, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0NG, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Lundh O, Rechatin C, Faure J, Ben-Ismaïl A, Lim J, De Wagter C, De Neve W, Malka V. Comparison of measured with calculated dose distribution from a 120-MeV electron beam from a laser-plasma accelerator. Med Phys 2012; 39:3501-8. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4719962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
20
|
Fuchs T, Szymanowski H, Oelfke U, Glinec Y, Rechatin C, Faure J, Malka V. Treatment planning for laser-accelerated very-high energy electrons. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54:3315-28. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
21
|
Malka V, Fuchs T, Oelfke U, Szymanowski H, Faure J, Glinec Y, Rechatin C. TU-D-BRA-03: Laser-Accelerated Electrons for Radiation Therapy. Med Phys 2007. [DOI: 10.1118/1.2761400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
22
|
Glinec Y, Faure J, Malka V, Fuchs T, Szymanowski H, Oelfke U. Radiotherapy with laser-plasma accelerators: Monte Carlo simulation of dose deposited by an experimental quasimonoenergetic electron beam. Med Phys 2006; 33:155-62. [PMID: 16485422 DOI: 10.1118/1.2140115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
The most recent experimental results obtained with laser-plasma accelerators are applied to radio-therapy simulations. The narrow electron beam, produced during the interaction of the laser with the gas jet, has a high charge (0.5 nC) and is quasimonoenergetic (170 +/- 20 MeV). The dose deposition is calculated in a water phantom placed at different distances from the diverging electron source. We show that, using magnetic fields to refocus the electron beam inside the water phantom, the transverse penumbra is improved. This electron beam is well suited for delivering a high dose peaked on the propagation axis, a sharp and narrow tranverse penumbra combined with a deep penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Glinec
- Laboratoire d'Optique Appliquée-ENSTA, UMR 7639, CNRS, Ecole Polytechnique, 91761 Palaiseau, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Olofsson L, Mu X, Nill S, Oelfke U, Zackrisson B, Karlsson M. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with electrons using algorithm based energy/range selection methods. Radiother Oncol 2004; 73:223-31. [PMID: 15542170 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2004.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2004] [Revised: 07/09/2004] [Accepted: 08/09/2004] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE In recent years photon intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has gained attention due to its ability to improve conformity of dose distributions. A potential advantage of electron-IMRT is that the dose fall off in the depth dose curve makes it possible to modulate the dose distribution in the direction of the beam by selecting different electron energies. This paper examines the use of a computer based energy selection in combination with the IMRT technique to optimise the electron dose distribution. MATERIALS AND METHODS One centimetre square electron beamlets ranging from 2.5 to 50 MeV were pre-calculated in water using Monte Carlo methods. A modified IMRT optimisation tool was then used to find an optimum mix of electron energies and intensities. The main principles used are illustrated in some simple geometries and tested on two clinical cases of post-operated ca. mam. RESULTS It is clearly illustrated that the energy optimisation procedure lowers the dose to lung and heart and makes the dose in the target more homogeneous. Increasing the energy at steep gradients compensates for lack of target coverage at beam edges and steep gradients. Comparison with a clinically acceptable four segment plan indicates the advantage of the used electron IMRT technique. CONCLUSIONS Using an intensity optimised mix of computer selected electron energies has the potential to improve electron treatments for mastectomy patients with good target coverage and reduced dose to normal tissue such as lung and heart.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennart Olofsson
- Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics, Umeå University, SE-901 87 Umeå, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Yang Y, Xing L. Inverse treatment planning with adaptively evolving voxel-dependent penalty scheme. Med Phys 2004; 31:2839-44. [PMID: 15543792 DOI: 10.1118/1.1799311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
In current inverse planning algorithms it is common to treat all voxels within a target or sensitive structure equally and use structure specific prescriptions and weighting factors as system parameters. In reality, the voxels within a structure are not identical in complying with their dosimetric goals and there exists strong intrastructural competition. Inverse planning objective function should not only balance the competing objectives of different structures but also that of the individual voxels in various structures. In this work we propose to model the intrastructural tradeoff through the modulation of voxel-dependent importance factors and deal with the challenging problem of how to obtain a sensible set of importance factors with a manageable amount of computing. Instead of letting the values of voxel-dependent importance to vary freely during the search process, an adaptive algorithm, in which the importance factors were tied to the local radiation doses through a heuristically constructed relation, was developed. It is shown that the approach is quite general and the EUD-based optimization is a special case of the proposed framework. The new planning tool was applied to study a hypothetical phantom case and a prostate case. Comparison of the results with that obtained using conventional inverse planning technique with structure specific importance factors indicated that the dose distributions from the conventional inverse planning are at best suboptimal and can be significantly improved with the help of the proposed nonuniform penalty scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305-5847, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Bortfeld T. Very high energy electromagnetically-scanned electron beams are an attractive alternative to photon IMRT. Med Phys 2004; 31:1946-8. [PMID: 15305444 DOI: 10.1118/1.1760769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Bortfeld
- Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Yeboah C, Sandison GA. Optimized treatment planning for prostate cancer comparing IMPT, VHEET and 15 MV IMXT. Phys Med Biol 2002; 47:2247-61. [PMID: 12164585 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/13/305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The merits of intensity-modulated very-high energy electron therapy (VHEET) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) in relation to intensity-modulated x-ray therapy (IMXT) with respect to the treatment of the prostate have been quantified. Optimized dose distributions were designed for 5-11 beams of 250 MeV VHEET and 15 MV IMXT as well as 1-9 beam ports of IMPT. In the case of the comparison between 250 MeV VHEET and 15 MV IMXT, it was found that the quality of target coverage achievable with VHEET was comparable to or sometimes better than that provided by IMXT. However, VHEET provided an improvement over IMXT in the dose sparing of the sensitive structures and normal tissues. Compared to IMXT, VHEET decreased the mean rectal dose and bladder dose by up to 10% of the prescribed target dose, while reducing by up to 12% of the prescribed target dose the integral dose to normal tissues. In quantifying the merits of IMPT relative to IMXT, it was found that using intensity-modulated proton beams for inverse planning instead of intensity-modulated photon beams improved target dose homogeneity by up to 1.3% of the prescribed target dose, while reducing the mean rectal dose, bladder dose, and normal tissue integral dose by up to 27%, 30% and 28% of the prescribed target dose respectively. The comparison of optimized planning for IMPT and VHEET showed that the quality of target coverage achievable with IMPT is comparable to or better (by up to 1.3% of the prescribed target dose) than that provided by VHEET. Compared to VHEET, IMPT delivered a mean rectal dose and a bladder dose that was lower by up to 17% and 23% of prescribed target dose respectively, and also reduced the integral dose to normal tissues by up to 17% of the prescribed target dose. These results indicate that of the three modalities the greatest dose escalation will be possible with IMPT, then VHEET, and then IMXT. It follows that IMPT will result in the highest probability of complication-free tumour control, while IMXT will provide the lowest probability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Yeboah
- Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|