Planning evaluation of radiotherapy for complex lung cancer cases using helical tomotherapy

Improvement of conformal arc plans by using deformable margin delineation method for stereotactic lung radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an established treatment technique in the management of medically inoperable early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Different techniques such as volumetric modulated arc (VMAT) and three-dimensional conformal arc (DCA) can be used in SBRT. Previously, it has been shown that VMAT is superior to DCA technique in terms of plan evaluation parameters. However, DCA technique has several advantages such as ease of use and considerable shortening of the treatment time. DCA technique usually results in worse conformity which is not possible to ameliorate by inverse optimization. In this study, we aimed to analyze whether a simple method - deformable margin delineation (DMD) - improves the quality of the DCA technique, reaching similar results to VMAT in terms of plan evaluation parameters.

METHODS

Twenty stage I-II (T1-2, N0, M0) NSCLC patients were included in this retrospective dosimetric study. Noncoplanar VMAT and conventional DCA plans were generated using 6 MV and 10 MV with flattening filter free (FFF) photon energies. The DCA plan with 6FFF was calculated and 95% of the PTV was covered by the prescription isodose line. Hot dose regions (receiving dose over 100% of prescription dose) outside PTV and cold dose regions (receiving dose under 100% of prescription dose) inside PTV were identified. A new PTV (PTV-DMD) was delineated by deforming PTV margin with respect to hot and cold spot regions obtained from conventional DCA plans. Dynamic multileaf collimators (MLC) were set to PTV-DMD beam eye view (BEV) positions and the new DCA plans (DCA-DMD) with 6FFF were generated. Three-dimensional (3D) dose calculations were computed for PTV-DMD volume. However, the prescription isodose was specified and normalized to cover 95% volume of original PTV. Several conformity indices and lung doses were compared for different treatment techniques.

RESULTS

DCA-DMD method significantly achieved a superior conformity index (CI), conformity number (CIPaddick ), gradient index (R50% ), isodose at 2 cm (D2 cm ) and external index (CΔ) with respect to VMAT and conventional DCA plans (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). CI ranged between 1.00-1.07 (Mean: 1.02); 1.00-1.18 (Mean: 1.06); 1.01-1.23 (Mean 1.08); 1.03-1.29 (Mean: 1.15); 1.04-1.29 (Mean: 1.18) for DCA-DMD-6FFF, VMAT-6FFF, VMAT-10FFF DCA-6FFF and DCA-10FFF respectively. DCA-DMD-6FFF technique resulted significantly better CI compared to others (P = 0.002; < 0.001; < 0.001; < 0.001). R50% ranged between 3.22-4.74 (Mean: 3.99); 3.24-5.92 (Mean: 4.15) for DCA-DMD-6FFF, VMAT-6FFF, respectively. DCA-DMD-6FFF technique resulted lower intermediate dose spillage compared to VMAT-6FFF, though the difference was statistically insignificant (P = 0.32). D2 cm ranged between 35.7% and 67.0% (Mean: 53.2%); 42.1%-79.2% (Mean: 57.8%) for DCA-DMD-6FFF, VMAT-6FFF respectively. DCA-DMD-6FFF have significantly better and sharp falloff gradient 2 cm away from PTV compared to VMAT-6FFF (P = 0.009). CΔ ranged between 0.052 and 0.140 (Mean: 0.085); 0,056-0,311 (Mean: 0.120) for DCA-DMD, VMAT-6FFF, respectively. DCA-DMD-6FFF have significantly improved CΔ (P = 0.002). VMAT- V20 Gy , V2.5 Gy and mean lung dose (MLD) indices are calculated to be 4.03%, 23.83%, 3.42 Gy and 4.19%, 27.88%,3.72 Gy, for DCA-DMD-6FFF and DCA techniques, respectively. DCA-DMD-6FFF achieved superior lung sparing compared to DCA technique. DCA-DMD-6FFF method reduced MUs 44% and 33% with respect to VMAT-6FFF and 10FFF, respectively, without sacrificing dose conformity (P < 0.001; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results demonstrated that DCA plan evaluation parameters can be ameliorated by using the DMD method. This new method improves DCA plan quality and reaches similar results with VMAT in terms of dosimetric parameters. We believe that DCA-DMD is a simple and effective technique for SBRT and can be preferred due to shorter treatment and planning time.

Dosimetric comparison of the helical tomotherapy, volumetric-modulated arc therapy and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for stage IIB-IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

The study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters to target dose coverage and the critical structures in the treatment planning of helical tomotherapy (TOMO), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for NSCLC delivering conventionally fractionated radiotherapy. Thirty patients with pathologically confirmed NSCLC were included. Three radiation treatment plans were designed for each patient. All patients received the uniform prescription dose of 60 Gy to the planning target volume. The conformity index (CI), heterogeneity index (HI), and parameters of critical structures were calculated. A significantly superior mean CI was observed in VMAT than in TOMO or IMRT (P = 0.013, 0.001). Mean HI was also better using VAMT or IMRT than TOMO (P = 0.002, 0.003). Mean lung V₂₀ and V₃₀ were significantly reduced by TOMO compared to IMRT (P = 0.019, 0.029). The heart was spared by IMRT compared to TOMO in terms of mean heart dose, V₅, V₁₀, and V₂₀ (P < 0.05). In larger tumor, VMAT provided the optimal dose distribution and sparing to heart. Compared to TOMO and IMRT, VMAT achieved better target dose distribution and similar sparing of critical structures. VMAT seemed to be the optimal technique for NSCLC.

Treating lung cancer with dynamic conformal arc therapy: a dosimetric study

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer patients are often in poor physical condition, and a shorter treatment time would reduce their discomfort. Dynamic conformal arc therapy (DCAT) offers a shorter treatment time than conventional 3D conformal radiotherapy (3D CRT) and is usually available even in departments without inverse planning possibilities. We examined its suitability as a treatment modality for lung cancer patients.

METHODS

On a cohort of 35 lung cancer patients, relevant dosimetric parameters were compared in respective DCAT and 3D CRT treatment plans. Radiochromic film dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom was used to compare both DCAT and 3D CRT dose distributions against their planned counterparts.

RESULTS

In comparison with their 3D CRT counterparts, DCAT plans equal or exceed the agreement between the calculated dose and the dose measured using film dosimetry. In dosimetric comparison, DCAT performed significantly better than 3D CRT in dose conformity to PTV and the number of monitor units used per plan, and significantly worse in dose homogeneity, mean lung dose and lung volume exposed to 5 Gy or more (V5Gy). No significant difference was found in the V20Gy value to lung, dose to 1 cm³ of spinal cord, and the mean dose to oesophagus. Improvements in V20Gy and V5Gy were found to be negatively correlated. DCAT plans differ from 3D CRT by exhibiting a moderate negative correlation between target volume sphericity and dose homogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

With respect to the agreement between the planned and the irradiated dose distribution, DCAT appears at least as reliable as 3D CRT. In specific conditions concerning the patient anatomy and treatment prescription, DCAT may yield more favourable dosimetric parameters. On average, however, conventional 3D CRT usually obtains better dosimetric parameters. We can thus only recommend DCAT as a complementary technique to the conventional 3D CRT.

The radiation techniques of tomotherapy & intensity-modulated radiation therapy applied to lung cancer

Radiotherapy (RT) plays an important role in the management of lung cancer. Development of radiation techniques is a possible way to improve the effect of RT by reducing toxicities through better sparing the surrounding normal tissues. This article will review the application of two forms of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), fixed-field IMRT and helical tomotherapy (HT) in lung cancer, including dosimetric and clinical studies. The advantages and potential disadvantages of these two techniques are also discussed.

Clinical outcome of helical tomotherapy for inoperable non- small cell lung cancer: the Kyung Hee University Medical Center experience

BACKGROUND

Published studies on clinical outcome of helical tomotherapy for lung cancer are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes and treatment-related toxicity in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with helical tomotherapy in Korea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty- seven patients with NSCLC were included in this retrospective study. Radiotherapy was performed using helical tomotherapy with a daily dose of 2.1-3 Gy delivered at 5 fractions per week resulting in a total dose of 62.5-69.3 Gy. We assessed radiation-related lung and esophageal toxicity, and analyzed overall survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and prognostic factors for overall survival.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 28.9 months (range, 10.1-69.4). The median overall survival time was 28.9 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 96.2%, 92.0%, and 60.0%. The median locoregional recurrence-free survival time was 24.3 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rates were 85.2%, 64.5%, and 50.3%. The median distant metastasis-free survival time was 26.7 months, and 1-, 2-, and 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 92.3%, 83.9%, and 65.3%, respectively. Gross tumor volume was the most significant prognostic factor for overall survival. No grade 4 or more toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical tomotherapy in patients with inoperable NSCLC resulted in high survival rates with an acceptable level of toxicity, suggesting it is an effective treatment option in patients with medically inoperable NSCLC.

Predictive factors for radiation pneumonitis in lung cancer treated with helical tomotherapy

Purpose

Predictive factors for radiation pneumonitis (RP) after helical tomotherapy (HT) may differ from those after linac-based radiotherapy. In this study, we identified predictive factors for RP in patients with lung cancer treated with HT.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical, treatment-related and dosimetric factors from 31 patients with lung cancer treated with HT. RP was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 and grade ≥2 RP was defined as a RP event. We used Kaplan-Meier methods to compute the actuarial incidence of RP. For univariate and multivariate analysis, the log-rank test and the Cox proportional regression hazard model were used. We generated receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curves to define the cutoff values for significant parameters.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 6.6 months (range, 1.6 to 38.5 months). The 2-, 4-, and 6-month actuarial RP event rates were 13.2%, 58.5%, and 67.0%, respectively. There was no grade 4 or more RP. Ipsilateral V5, V10, V15, and contralateral V5 were related with RP event on univariate analysis. By multivariate analysis, ipsilateral V10 was factor most strongly associated with RP event. On the ROC curve, the cutoff values of ipsilateral V5, V10, V15, and contralateral V5 were 67.5%, 58.5%, 50.0%, and 55.5%, respectively.

Conclusion

In our study, ipsilateral V5, V10, V15, and contralateral V5 were significant predictive factors for RP after HT.

Tomotherapy: implications on daily workload and scheduling patients based on three years' institutional experience

Helical tomotherapy (HT) was introduced at the Greater Poland Cancer Centre (GPCC) in April 2009. Retrospective analysis included data from the treatments performed for the first 656 patients treated with HT between May 2009 and May 2012 at the GPCC. In order to evaluate the implications on daily workload and scheduling of patients, stepwise regression and time analysis for each component of the overall treatment time, such as positioning, imaging, registration, and irradiation were performed. A detailed analysis included: (1) learning curves and optimized time needed for positioning and registration; (2) relation between irradiation time and parameters used for plan creation; and (3) average time of daily imaging. The irradiation component has the highest influence on the overall treatment time (R = 0.911). The lowest influence was observed for the imaging (R = 0.670). The learning curve for positioning was 7 months while the reduction of the average daily time needed for registration was observed even after two years. The irradiation time strongly depends on the planning parameters. Changing the pitch from 0.215 to 0.287 for pelvic cancer cases decreased the average daily beam-on time per patient by about 2 minutes. Similar changes for head and neck reduced this time by 1.3 minutes. The limitation in the usage of 1 cm field width only for complex cases, lower than 10 cm in the cranio-caudal direction, reduced the beam-on time per patient by 2 minutes. The average overall treatment time decreased from 21.5 minutes per patient in the first year of the HT usage to 13.8 minutes per patient in current practice. Our current practice shows that for a group of patients including mainly those with pelvis and head and neck cancers, the HT treatment takes approximately 15 minutes per patient allowing 40 patients to be treated within 10 hours.

Superiority of conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy over helical tomotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A comparative plan analysis

PURPOSE

To compare helical tomotherapy (HT) and conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) using a variety of dosimetric and radiobiologic indexes in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 20 patients with LA-NSCLC were enrolled. IMRT plans with 4-6 coplanar beams and HT plans were generated for each patient. Dose distributions and dosimetric indexes for the tumors and critical structures were computed for both plans and compared.

RESULTS

Both modalities created highly conformal plans. They did not differ in the volumes of lung exposed to > 20 Gy of radiation. The average mean lung dose, volume receiving ≥ 30 Gy, and volume receiving ≥ 10 Gy in HT planning were 18.3 Gy, 18.5%, and 57.1%, respectively, compared to 19.4 Gy, 25.4%, and 48.9%, respectively, with IMRT (p = 0.004, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001). The differences between HT and IMRT in lung volume receiving ≥ 10-20 Gy increased significantly as the planning target volume (PTV) increased. For 6 patients who had PTV greater than 700 cm(3), IMRT was superior to HT for 5 patients in terms of lung volume receiving ≥ 5-20 Gy. The integral dose to the entire thorax in HT plans was significantly higher than in IMRT plans.

CONCLUSION

HT gave significantly better control of mean lung dose and volume receiving ≥ 30-40 Gy, whereas IMRT provided better control of the lung volume receiving ≥ 5-15 Gy and the integral dose to entire thorax. In most patients with PTV greater than 700 cm(3), IMRT was superior to HT in terms of lung volume receiving ≥ 5-20 Gy. It is therefore advised that caution should be exercised when planning LA-NSCLC using HT.

Magnetic resonance imaging for adaptive cobalt tomotherapy: A proposal

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides excellent soft tissue contrast for oncology applications. We propose to combine a MRI scanner with a helical tomotherapy (HT) system to enable daily target imaging for improved conformal radiation dose delivery to a patient. HT uses an intensity-modulated fan-beam that revolves around a patient, while the patient slowly advances through the plane of rotation, yielding a helical beam trajectory. Since the use of a linear accelerator to produce radiation may be incompatible with the pulsed radiofrequency and the high and pulsed magnetic fields required for MRI, it is proposed that a radioactive Cobalt-60 ((60)Co) source be used instead to provide the radiation. An open low field (0.25 T) MRI system is proposed where the tomotherapy ring gantry is located between two sets of Helmholtz coils that can generate a sufficiently homogenous main magnetic field.It is shown that the two major challenges with the design, namely acceptable radiation dose rate (and therefore treatment duration) and moving parts in strong magnetic field, can be addressed. The high dose rate desired for helical tomotherapy delivery can be achieved using two radiation sources of 220TBq (6000Ci) each on a ring gantry with a source to axis-of-rotation distance of 75 cm. In addition to this, a dual row multi-leaf collimator (MLC) system with 15 mm leaf width at isocentre and relatively large fan beam widths between 15 and 30 mm per row shall be employed. In this configuration, the unit would be well-suited for most pelvic radiotherapy applications where the soft tissue contrast of MRI will be particularly beneficial. Non-magnetic MRI compatible materials must be used for the rotating gantry. Tungsten, which is non-magnetic, can be used for primary collimation of the fan-beam as well as for the MLC, which allows intensity modulated radiation delivery. We propose to employ a low magnetic Cobalt compound, sycoporite (CoS) for the Cobalt source material itself.Rotational delivery is less susceptible to problems related to the use of a low energy megavoltage photon source while the helical delivery reduces the negative impact of the relatively large penumbra inherent in the use of Cobalt sources for radiotherapy. On the other hand, the use of a (60)Co source ensures constant dose rate with gantry rotation and makes dose calculation in a magnetic field as easy as the range of secondary electrons is limited.The MR-integrated Cobalt tomotherapy unit, dubbed 'MiCoTo,' uses two independent physical principles for image acquisition and treatment delivery. It would offer excellent target definition and will allow following target motion during treatment using fast imaging techniques thus providing the best possible input for adaptive radiotherapy. As an additional bonus, quality assurance of the radiation delivery can be performed in situ using radiation sensitive gels imaged by MRI.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy might increase pneumonitis risk relative to three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in patients receiving combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy: a modeling study of dose dumping

PURPOSE

To model the possible interaction between cytotoxic chemotherapy and the radiation dose distribution with respect to the risk of radiation pneumonitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 18 non-small-cell lung cancer patients previously treated with helical tomotherapy at the University of Wisconsin were selected for the present modeling study. Three treatment plans were considered: the delivered tomotherapy plans; a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plan; and a fixed-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plan. The IMRT and 3D-CRT plans were generated specifically for the present study. The plans were optimized without adjusting for the chemotherapy effect. The effect of chemotherapy was modeled as an independent cell killing process by considering a uniform chemotherapy equivalent radiation dose added to all voxels of the organ at risk. The risk of radiation pneumonitis was estimated for all plans using the Lyman and the critical volume models.

RESULTS

For radiotherapy alone, the critical volume model predicts that the two IMRT plans are associated with a lower risk of radiation pneumonitis than the 3D-CRT plan. However, when the chemotherapy equivalent radiation dose exceeds a certain threshold, the radiation pneumonitis risk after IMRT is greater than after 3D-CRT. This threshold dose is in the range estimated from clinical chemoradiotherapy data sets.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytotoxic chemotherapy might affect the relative merit of competing radiotherapy plans. More work is needed to improve our understanding of the interaction between chemotherapy and the radiation dose distribution in clinical settings.

Comparison of the helical tomotherapy against the multileaf collimator-based intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3D conformal radiation modalities in lung cancer radiotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare three-dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy and the two different forms of IMRT in lung cancer radiotherapy.

METHODS

Cases of four lung cancer patients were investigated by developing a 3D conformal treatment plan, a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and an HT plan for each case. With the use of the complication-free tumour control probability (P(+)) index and the uniform dose concept as the common prescription point of the plans, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures.

RESULTS

The applied plan evaluation method shows the MLC-based IMRT and the HT treatment plans are almost equivalent over the clinically useful dose prescription range; however, the 3D conformal plan inferior. At the optimal dose levels, the 3D conformal treatment plans give an average P(+) of 48.1% for a effective uniform dose to the internal target volume (ITV) of 62.4 Gy, whereas the corresponding MLC-based IMRT treatment plans are more effective by an average ΔP(+) of 27.0% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 16.3 Gy. Similarly, the HT treatment plans are more effective than the 3D-conformal plans by an average ΔP(+) of 23.8% for a Δ effective uniform dose of 11.6 Gy.

CONCLUSION

A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumours and normal tissues. The use of P - effective uniform dose diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.

Feasibility of helical tomotherapy in stereotactic body radiation therapy for centrally located early stage non‒small-cell lung cancer or lung metastases

PURPOSE

To investigate the ability of helical tomotherapy (HT) to spare critical organs immediately adjacent to the tumor target in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for centrally located lung lesions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

HT SBRT plans for 10 patients with centrally located lesions or lesions immediately adjacent to a critical structure were generated. A total of 70 Gy in 10 fractions was prescribed to the planning target volume (PTV) to satisfy a target volume coverage of ≥95% PTV receiving 70 Gy and an established set of dose constraints for the organs at risk (OARs). Quality assurance (QA) of the HT plans was performed with both ion chamber and film measurements.

RESULTS

The PTV coverage criteria was met with 95% of the PTV receiving 70.68 ± 0.33 Gy for all cases even though the OARs immediately adjacent to the PTV ranged from 0.38 to 0.85 cm away. The mean lung dose (MLD), and V(20) were 7.15 ± 1.44 Gy, and 11.93 ± 3.24 % for the total lung, respectively. The dose parameters of MLD, V(5), V(10), and V(20) for the contralateral lung were significantly lower than those for the ipsilateral lung (p < 0.05). An average dose fall off from the PTV periphery to the edge of the immediately adjacent OAR was 47.6% over an average distance of 4.87 mm. Comparison of calculated and measured doses with the ion chamber showed an average of 1.85% point dose error, whereas an average mean gamma and the area with a gamma larger than 1 of 0.20 and 0.94% were observed, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HT allows the sparing of critical structures immediately adjacent to the tumor target, thus making SBRT for these centrally located lesions feasible.

Feasibility study of multi-pass respiratory-gated helical tomotherapy of a moving target via binary MLC closure

Gated radiotherapy of lung lesions is particularly complex for helical tomotherapy, due to the simultaneous motions of its three subsystems (gantry, couch and collimator). We propose a new way to implement gating for helical tomotherapy, namely multi-pass respiratory gating. In this method, gating is achieved by delivering only the beam projections that occur within a respiratory gating window, while blocking the rest of the beam projections by fully closing all collimator leaves. Due to the continuous couch motion, the planned beam projections must be delivered over multiple passes of radiation deliveries. After each pass, the patient couch is reset to its starting position, and the treatment recommences at a different phase of tumour motion to 'fill in' the previously blocked beam projections. The gating process may be repeated until the plan dose is delivered (full gating), or halted after a certain number of passes, with the entire remaining dose delivered in a final pass without gating (partial gating). The feasibility of the full gating approach was first tested for sinusoidal target motion, through experimental measurements with film and computer simulation. The optimal gating parameters for full and partial gating methods were then determined for various fractionation schemes through computer simulation, using a patient respiratory waveform. For sinusoidal motion, the PTV dose deviations of -29 to 5% observed without gating were reduced to range from -1 to 3% for a single fraction, with a 4 pass full gating. For a patient waveform, partial gating required fewer passes than full gating for all fractionation schemes. For a single fraction, the maximum allowed residual motion was only 4 mm, requiring large numbers of passes for both full (12) and partial (7 + 1) gating methods. The number of required passes decreased significantly for 3 and 30 fractions, allowing residual motion up to 7 mm. Overall, the multi-pass gating technique was shown to be a promising way to reduce the impact of lung tumour motion during helical tomotherapy.

Helical tomotherapy with concurrent capecitabine for the treatment of inoperable pancreatic cancer

Background

Helical tomotherapy, an advanced intensity-modulated radiation therapy with integrated CT imaging, permits highly conformal irradiation with sparing of normal tissue. Capecitabine, a pro-drug of 5-FU that induces thymidine phosphorylase can achieve higher levels of intracellular 5-FU when administered concurrently with radiation. We evaluated the feasibility as well as the clinical outcome of concurrent administration of capecitabine with tomotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Methods

Nineteen patients with advanced pancreatic cancer including primarily unresectable disease and recurrence after curative surgery were included in the study. Two planning target volumes (PTV) were entered: PTV1 is gross tumor volume; and PTV2, the volume of the draining lymph nodes. The total doses to target 1 and target 2 were 55 and 50 Gy, respectively. Capecitabine at 1600 mg/m²/day was administered on each day of irradiation.

Results

Twenty six measurable lesions were evaluated. Overall in-field response rate was 42.3%; partial responses were achieved in 53.3% of the pancreatic masses, 28.6% of distant metastatic lesions and 25.0% of regional lymph nodes. The median duration of follow-up after tomotherapy was 6.5 months. None of the lesions showed in-field progression. Treatment was well tolerated with only minor toxicities such as grade 1 nausea (one patient), grade 1 hand-foot syndrome (one patient) and grade 1/2 fatigue (three patients).

Conclusions

Helical tomotherapy with concurrent capecitabine is a feasible option without significant toxicities in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. We achieved excellent conformal distribution of radiation doses and minimal treatment-related toxicities with promising target volume responses.

Toxicity report of a phase 1/2 dose-escalation study in patients with inoperable, locally advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer with helical tomotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

The objective of the current study was to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of radiation dose escalation with concurrent chemotherapy using helical tomotherapy (HT) in patients with inoperable, locally advanced, stage III nonsmall cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) (grading determined according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer 6th edition grading system).

METHODS

This phase 1/2 study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of radiotherapy in patients with LANSCLC administered concurrently with docetaxel and cisplatin. Radiotherapy was delivered using HT. A dose per fraction escalation was applied starting at 2 grays (Gy), with an increase of 6% per dose cohort (DC). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute radiation morbidity score was used to monitor pulmonary, esophageal, and cardiac toxicity.

RESULTS

Dose escalation was performed in 34 patients over 5 DCs to a dose per fraction of 2.48 Gy. No differences were observed in acute toxicity between the different DCs. However, a significant increase in late lung toxicity in DC IV, which received a fraction size of 2.36 Gy, necessitated a halt in further dose escalation with the MTD defined as 2.24 Gy per fraction. The overall incidence of acute grade > or =3 esophageal and pulmonary toxicity was 24% and 3%, respectively (grading determined according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group-European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer toxicity scoring system). The overall incidence of late lung toxicity was 21%, but the incidence was an acceptable 13% in DCs I, II, and III. The local response rate was 61% on computed tomography images.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of HT to 67.2 Gy with concurrent cisplatin/docetaxel was feasible and resulted in acceptable toxicity. A full phase 2 study has been initiated to establish the true local response rate at the MTD of 2.24 Gy per fraction.

New developments in arc radiation therapy: a review

Arc therapies have gained widespread clinical interest in radiation oncology over the past decade. Arc therapies have several potential advantages over standard techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy, with implications for patients, administrators, and oncologists. This review focuses on the rationale for arc therapy, descriptions of the modern arc techniques that are currently clinically available, and highlights some distinguishing features of arc therapies, such as dose distributions, treatment times, and imaging capabilities. Arc therapies are exciting examples of progress in radiotherapy through technological innovation, aimed at ultimately improving the therapeutic ratio for patients receiving radiation.

Radiosurgery in the treatment of spinal metastases: tumor control, survival, and quality of life after helical tomotherapy

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness and limitations of spinal radiosurgery using a helical TomoTherapy system for the treatment of spinal metastases are reviewed in this article.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery for spinal metastases between July 2004 and December 2007. Radiographic follow-up consisted of magnetic resonance imaging to assess tumor growth control as well as pre- and posttreatment x-rays, which were used to measure changes in segmental angulation and deformity. Clinical performance was assessed using the Karnofsky Performance Scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and visual analog scale.

RESULTS

Forty patients were treated for 110 metastatic tumors (range, 1-6 tumors per patient). The mean age at the time of radiosurgical treatment was 67 years (age range, 35-81 years). Twenty-three patients (57.5%) had undergone previous surgical resection. Pain was the most common presenting symptom, seen in 32 patients (80%). The mean Oswestry Disability Index score at presentation was 43 (range, 20-90), and the mean visual analog scale score was 6.2 (range, 0-10). The mean radiosurgical dose to the tumor was 17.3 Gy (range, 10-24 Gy). At a mean follow-up duration of 12.7 months (range, 4-32 months), decreased or stable tumor volume was seen in 90 (82%) of the tumors treated. There was improvement in pain in 34 patients (85%). The mean postradiosurgical Oswestry Disability Index score was 25 (range, 10-90), whereas the postradiosurgical visual analog scale score was 3.2 (range, 0-9). Progression of kyphosis was the most common radiographic sequela, experienced by 73% of patients alive at 12 months, with a mean change in angulation of 7.3 +/- 4.5 degrees.

CONCLUSION

Radiosurgery is effective as either primary or adjunctive treatment of metastatic tumors of the spine.

Toxicity and outcome results of a class solution with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in inoperable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer using helical tomotherapy

PURPOSE

To prospectively assess the feasibility, toxicity, and local control of a class solution protocol of moderately hypofractionated tomotherapy in Stage III, inoperable, locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eligible patients were treated according to a uniform class solution (70.5 Gy in 30 fractions) with fixed constraints and priorities using helical tomotherapy. Toxicity monitoring was performed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria and the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria and Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0. Pulmonary function tests were performed at the start and repeated at 3 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Our class solution resulted in a deliverable plan in all 40 consecutive patients. Acute Grade 3 lung toxicity was seen in 10% of patients. Two patients died during acute follow-up with pulmonary toxicity. Correlations were found between changes in pulmonary function test results and mean lung dose or the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (V(20)). The correlation was strongest for lung diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide. A V(20) of >27% and >32% were predictive for Grades 2 and 3 acute lung toxicity respectively (p < 0.05). Late Grade 3 toxicity was exclusively pulmonary, with an incidence of 16%. Overall Grade 3 lung toxicity correlated with a mean lung dose of >18 Gy and a median lung dose of >5 Gy (p < 0.05). Median survival was 17 months, and the 1-year and 2-year local progression-free survivals were 66% and 50%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The current class solution using moderately hypofractionated helical tomotherapy in patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer is feasible. Toxicity was acceptable and in line with other reports on intensity-modulated radiotherapy. The local progression-free survival was encouraging considering the unselected population.

Comparison of the helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT radiation modalities in treating brain and cranio-spinal tumors

The investigation of the clinical efficacy and effectiveness of Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) using Multileaf Collimators (MLC) and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) has been an issue of increasing interest over the past few years. In order to assess the suitability of a treatment plan, dosimetric criteria such as dose-volume histograms (DVH), maximum, minimum, mean, and standard deviation of the dose distribution are typically used. Nevertheless, the radiobiological parameters of the different tumors and normal tissues are often not taken into account. The use of the biologically effective uniform dose (D=) together with the complication-free tumor control probability (P(+)) were applied to evaluate the two radiation modalities. Two different clinical cases of brain and cranio-spinal axis cancers have been investigated by developing a linac MLC-based step-and-shoot IMRT plan and a Helical Tomotherapy plan. The treatment plans of the MLC-based IMRT were developed on the Philips treatment planning station using the Pinnacle 7.6 software release while the dedicated Tomotherapy treatment planning station was used for the HT plan. With the use of the P(+) index and the D(=) concept as the common prescription point, the different treatment plans were compared based on radiobiological measures. The tissue response probabilities were plotted against D(=) for a range of prescription doses. The applied plan evaluation method shows that in the brain cancer, the HT treatment gives slightly better results than the MLC-based IMRT in terms of optimum expected clinical outcome (P(+) of 66.1% and 63.5% for a D(=) to the PTV of 63.0 Gy and 62.0 Gy, respectively). In the cranio-spinal axis cancer, the HT plan is significantly better compared to the MLC-based IMRT plan over the clinically useful dose prescription range (P(+) of 84.1% and 28.3% for a D(=) to the PTV of 50.6 Gy and 44.0 Gy, respectively). If a higher than 5% risk for complications could be allowed, the complication-free tumor control could be increased by almost 30% compared to the initial dose prescription. In comparison to MLC based-IMRT, HT can better encompass the often large PTV while minimizing the volume of the OARs receiving high dose. A radiobiological treatment plan evaluation can provide a closer association of the delivered treatment with the clinical outcome by taking into account the dose-response relations of the irradiated tumors and normal tissues. The use of P - (D=) diagrams can complement the traditional tools of evaluation such as DVHs, in order to compare and effectively evaluate different treatment plans.

Reirradiation of multiple brain metastases with helical tomotherapy. A multifocal simultaneous integrated boost for eight or more lesions

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

: Recurrent brain metastases or new brain lesions after whole-brain radiotherapy represent a therapeutic challenge. While several treatment methods for single or few lesions have been described, options for multiple lesions are limited. This case report is intended to show an approach of whole-brain reirradiation with a simultaneous multifocal integrated boost using helical tomotherapy. Technique, feasibility, and acute side effects are presented.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

: Two patients with multiple relapsed brain metastases (eight and eleven lesions) were reirradiated after previous whole-brain radiotherapy (total dose of 40 Gy 18 months before). Whole-brain reirradiation was performed using helical tomotherapy with a total dose of 15 Gy (single dose 1.5 Gy) and a multifocal simultaneous integrated boost with a total dose of 30 Gy (single dose 3 Gy) to the brain lesions. The boost planning target volume was delineated around the lesions visible on MRI plus a 2-mm margin. Follow-up of these patients was 6 and 12 months.

RESULTS

: Radiation plans with excellent conformity and homogeneity were obtained. High dose exposure to normal brain tissue was kept minimal. Mean radiation time was 13 min. The only acute side effect observed was a mild headache over 2 days at the end of treatment. So far, no further side effects and no signs of recurrence have been observed.

CONCLUSION

: Helical tomotherapy offers new treatment options for the reirradiation of multiple brain metastases. The number of cases treated with the described protocol is very limited but it is considered a promising option for patients that have responded well to the initial radiotherapy and are in a good performance status.

Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery

Helical tomotherapy delivers intensity modulated radiation therapy using a binary multileaf collimator (MLC) to modulate a fan beam of radiation. This delivery occurs while the linac gantry and treatment couch are both in constant motion, so the beam describes, from a patient/phantom perspective, a spiral or helix of dose. The planning system models this continuous delivery as a large number (51) of discrete gantry positions per rotation, and given the small jaw/fan width setting typically used (1 or 2.5 cm) and the number of overlapping rotations used to cover the target (pitch often <0.5), the treatment planning system (TPS) potentially employs a very large number of static beam directions and leaf opening configurations to model the modulated fields. All dose calculations performed by the system employ a convolution/superposition model. In this work the authors perform a full Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculation of tomotherapy deliveries to phantom computed tomography (CT) data sets to verify the TPS calculations. All MC calculations are performed with the EGSnrc-based MC simulation codes, BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. Simulations are performed by taking the sinogram (leaf opening versus time) of the treatment plan and decomposing it into 51 different projections per rotation, as does the TPS, each of which is segmented further into multiple MLC opening configurations, each with different weights that correspond to leaf opening times. Then the projection is simulated by the summing of all of the opening configurations, and the overall rotational treatment is simulated by the summing of all of the projection simulations. Commissioning of the source model was verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the percent depth dose and beam profiles shapes for various jaw settings. The accuracy of the MLC leaf width and tongue and groove spacing were verified by comparing measured and simulated values for the MLC leakage and a picket fence pattern. The validated source and MLC configuration were then used to simulate a complex modulated delivery from fixed gantry angle. Further, a preliminary rotational treatment plan to a delivery quality assurance phantom (the "cheese" phantom) CT data set was simulated. Simulations were compared with measured results taken with an A1SL ionization chamber or EDR2 film measurements in a water tank or in a solid water phantom, respectively. The source and MLC MC simulations agree with the film measurements, with an acceptable number of pixels passing the 2%/1 mm gamma criterion. 99.8% of voxels of the MC calculation in the planning target volume (PTV) of the preliminary plan passed the 2%/2 mm gamma value test. 87.0% and 66.2% of the voxels in two organs at risk (OARs) passed the 2%/2 mm tests. For a 3%/3 mm criterion, the PTV and OARs show 100%, 93.2%, and 86.6% agreement, respectively. All voxels passed the gamma value test with a criterion of 5%/3 mm. The Tomo-Therapy TPS showed comparable results.

Treatment planning comparison between conformal radiotherapy and helical tomotherapy in the case of locally advanced-stage NSCLC

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the impact of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) upon the dose distribution when compared to our routinely delivered 3D conformal radiotherapy (CRT) in the case of patients affected by stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirteen stage III inoperable NSCLC patients were scheduled to receive 61.2-70.2Gy, 1.8Gy/fraction. Two treatment techniques (HT and CRT) were considered, and in the case of CRT the dose calculation was performed using both the pencil beam (PB) and Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm (AAA) available on the Varian Eclipse planning system. Dose volume constraints for PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed for the HT inverse planning with the highest priority upon PTV coverage and spinal cord sparing. The three plans were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP). A statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric Wilcoxon matched pairs tests.

RESULTS

In CRT the use of a less accurate algorithm (PB) decreased the monitor unit number by 2.4%. HT significantly improved dose homogeneity within PTV compared with CRT_AAA. For lung parenchyma V20-V40 were lower with HT, corresponding to a decrease of 7% in the risk of radiation pneumonitis. The volume of the heart and esophagus irradiated to >45-60Gy were reduced using HT plans. For eight PTs with an esophagus-PTV overlap >5%, HT significantly reduced both late and acute esophageal complication probability.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings obtained in stage III NSCLC patients underline that HT guarantees an important sparing of lungs and esophagus, thus HT has the potential to improve therapeutic ratio, when compared with CRT, by means of dose escalation and/or combined treatment strategy. In CRT of locally advanced lung cancers, the use of a more advanced algorithm would give significantly better modeling of target dose and coverage.

Comparison of fixed-beam IMRT, helical tomotherapy, and IMPT for selected cases

A growing number of advanced intensity modulated treatment techniques is becoming available. In this study, the specific strengths and weaknesses of four techniques, static and dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC), conventional linac-based IMRT, helical tomotherapy (HT), and spot-scanning proton therapy (IMPT) are investigated in the framework of biological, EUD-based dose optimization. All techniques were implemented in the same in-house dose optimization tool. Monte Carlo dose computation was used in all cases. All dose-limiting, normal tissue objectives were treated as hard constraints so as to facilitate comparability. Five patient cases were selected to offer each technique a chance to show its strengths: a deep-seated prostate case (for 15 MV linac-based IMRT), a pediatric case (for IMPT), an extensive head-and-neck case (for HT), a lung tumor (for HT), and an optical neurinoma (for noncoplanar linac-based IMRT with a miniMLC). The plans were compared by dose statistics and equivalent uniform dose metrics. All techniques delivered results that were comparable with respect to target coverage and the most dose-limiting normal tissues. Static MLC IMRT struggled to achieve sufficient target coverage at the same level of dose homogeneity in the lung case. IMPT gained the greatest advantage when lung sparing was important, but did not significantly reduce the risk of nearby organs. Tomotherapy and dynamic MLC IMRT showed mostly the same performance. Despite the apparent conceptual differences, all four techniques fare equally well for standard patient cases. The absence of relevant differences is in part due to biological optimization, which offers more freedom to shape the dose than do, e.g., dose volume histogram constraints. Each technique excels for certain classes of highly complex cases, and hence the various modalities should be viewed as complementary, rather than competing.

Dose-volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Helical tomotherapy (HT) and intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) are two arc-based approaches to the delivery of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Through plan comparisons we have investigated the potential of IMAT, both with constant (conventional or IMAT-C) and variable (non-conventional or IMAT-NC, a theoretical exercise) dose-rate, to serve as an alternative to helical tomotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six patients with prostate tumours treated by HT with a moderately hypo-fractionated protocol, involving a simultaneous integrated boost, were re-planned as IMAT treatments. A method for IMAT inverse-planning using a commercial module for static IMRT combined with a multi-leaf collimator (MLC) arc-sequencing was developed. IMAT plans were compared to HT plans in terms of dose statistics and radiobiological indices.

RESULTS

Concerning the planning target volume (PTV), the mean doses for all PTVs were similar for HT and IMAT-C plans with minimum dose, target coverage, equivalent uniform dose (EUD) and tumour control probability (TCP) values being generally higher for HT; maximum dose and degree of heterogeneity were instead higher for IMAT-C. In relation to organs at risk, mean doses and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) values were similar between the two modalities, except for the penile bulb where IMAT was significantly better. Re-normalizing all plans to the same rectal toxicity (NTCP=5%), the HT modality yielded higher TCP than IMAT-C but there was no significant difference between HT and IMAT-NC. The integral dose with HT was higher than that for IMAT.

CONCLUSIONS

with regards to the plan analysis, the HT is superior to IMAT-C in terms of target coverage and dose homogeneity within the PTV. Introducing dose-rate variation during arc-rotation, not deliverable with current linac technology, the simulations result in comparable plan indices between (IMAT-NC) and HT.

Sparing the parotid glands and surgically transferred submandibular gland with helical tomotherapy in post-operative radiation of head and neck cancer: a planning study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of sparing the parotid glands and surgically transferred submandibular gland (SMG) by intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in post-operative cases of head and neck cancer (HNC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten patients (larynx-2, base of tongue-4, tonsil-3, and unknown primary-1; pathologic stages III-IV) who underwent SMG transfers on the side of N0 neck along with definitive surgery were selected for this study. IMRT planning was done retrospectively using helical tomotherapy approach. Planning objective was to deliver 60 Gy to PTV1 and 54 Gy to PTV2 while maintaining the mean dose to the total parotid volume (TPV) and SMG less than 26 Gy.

RESULTS

The mean dose (+/-SD) to the TPV and SMG were 25+/-0.6 Gy and 23+/-1.9 Gy, respectively. The D(95) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 59.9+/-0.1 Gy and 54.9+/-0.3 Gy, respectively, satisfying our planning goal for PTV coverage. The D(99) for PTV1 and PTV2 were 58.2+/-0.7 Gy and 49.5+/-2.2 Gy, respectively, showing that sparing the salivary glands did not result in underdosing of the PTVs.

CONCLUSIONS

By combining the gland transfer and IMRT, the mean dose to TPV and transferred SMG could be reduced to less than 26 Gy in post-operative patients of HNC.

Evaluating target coverage and normal tissue sparing in the adjuvant radiotherapy of malignant pleural mesothelioma: helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT

PURPOSE

To evaluate the potential of helical tomotherapy in the adjuvant treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma and compare target homogeneity, conformity and normal tissue dose with step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ten patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and permetrexed followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP) were treated in our department with 54 Gy to the hemithorax delivered by step-and-shoot IMRT. A planning comparison was performed by creating radiation plans for helical tomotherapy. The different plans were compared by analysing target homogeneity using the homogeneity indices HI(max) and HI(min) and target conformity by using the conformity index CI(95). To assess target coverage and normal tissue sparing TV(90), TV(95) and mean and maximum doses were compared.

RESULTS

Both modalities achieved excellent dose distributions while sparing organs at risk. Target coverage and homogeneity could be increased significantly with helical tomotherapy compared with step-and-shoot IMRT. Mean dose to the contralateral lung could be lowered beyond 5 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our planning study showed that helical tomotherapy is an excellent option for the adjuvant intensity-modulated radiotherapy of MPM. It is capable of improving target coverage and homogeneity.

A Prospective Evaluation of Helical Tomotherapy

PURPOSE

To report results from two clinical trials evaluating helical tomotherapy (HT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients were enrolled in one of two prospective trials of HT (one for palliative and one for radical treatment). Both an HT plan and a companion three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) plan were generated. Pretreatment megavoltage computed tomography was used for daily image guidance.

RESULTS

From September 2004 to January 2006, a total of 61 sites in 60 patients were treated. In all but one case, a clinically acceptable tomotherapy plan for treatment was generated. Helical tomotherapy plans were subjectively equivalent or superior to 3D-CRT in 95% of plans. Helical tomotherapy was deemed equivalent or superior in two thirds of dose-volume point comparisons. In cases of inferiority, differences were either clinically insignificant and/or reflected deliberate tradeoffs to optimize the HT plan. Overall imaging and treatment time (median) was 27 min (range, 16-91 min). According to a patient questionnaire, 78% of patients were satisfied to very satisfied with the treatment process.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical tomotherapy demonstrated clear advantages over conventional 3D-CRT in this diverse patient group. The prospective trials were helpful in deploying this technology in a busy clinical setting.

Dose as a function of lung volume and planned treatment volume in helical tomotherapy intensity-modulated radiation therapy-based stereotactic body radiation therapy for small lung tumors

PURPOSE

To evaluate the limitations of Hi-Art Helical Tomotherapy (Middleton, WI) stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for lung lesions, and to provide an initial report on patients treated with this method. Stereotactic body radiotherapy was shown to be an effective, well-tolerated treatment for early-stage, non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0236 protocol is currently evaluating three-dimensional conformal SBRT that delivers 60 Gy in three fractions.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Inverse treatment planning for hypothetical lung gross tumor volumes (GTV) and planned treatment volume (PTV) expansions were performed. We tested the hypothesis that the maximum acceptable dose (MAD) to be delivered to the lesion by SBRT could be predicted by PTV and lung volume. Dose constraints on normal tissue were as designated by the RTOG protocol. Inverse planning was performed to find the maximum tolerated SBRT dose up to 60 Gy.

RESULTS

Regression analysis of the data obtained indicated a linear relationship between MAD, PTV, and lung volume. This generated two equations which may be useful predictive tools. Seven patients with Stage I and II NSCLC treated at the University of Virginia with this method tolerated the treatment extremely well, and suffered no greater than grade I toxicity, with no evidence of disease recurrence in follow-up from 2-20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Helical tomotherapy SBRT for lung lesions is well-tolerated. In addition, the likely MAD for patients considered for this type of treatment can be predicted by PTV and lung volume.

Segmentation and leaf sequencing for intensity modulated arc therapy

A common method in generating intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans consists of a three step process: an optimized fluence intensity map (IM) for each beam is generated via inverse planning, this IM is then segmented into discrete levels, and finally, the segmented map is translated into a set of MLC apertures via a leaf sequencing algorithm. To date, limited work has been done on this approach as it pertains to intensity modulated arc therapy (IMAT), specifically in regards to the latter two steps. There are two determining factors that separate IMAT segmentation and leaf sequencing from their IMRT equivalents: (1) the intrinsic 3D nature of the intensity maps (standard 2D maps plus the angular component), and (2) that the dynamic multileaf collimator (MLC) constraints be met using a minimum number of arcs. In this work, we illustrate a technique to create an IMAT plan that replicates Tomotherapy deliveries by applying IMAT specific segmentation and leaf-sequencing algorithms to Tomotherapy output sinograms. We propose and compare two alternative segmentation techniques, a clustering method, and a bottom-up segmentation method (BUS). We also introduce a novel IMAT leaf-sequencing algorithm that explicitly takes leaf movement constraints into consideration. These algorithms were tested with 51 angular projections of the output leaf-open sinograms generated on the Hi-ART II treatment planning system (Tomotherapy Inc.). We present two geometric phantoms and 2 clinical scenarios as sample test cases. In each case 12 IMAT plans were created, ranging from 2 to 7 intensity levels. Half were generated using the BUS segmentation and half with the clustering method. We report on the number of arcs produced as well as differences between Tomotherapy output sinograms and segmented IMAT intensity maps. For each case one plan for each segmentation method is chosen for full Monte Carlo dose calculation (NumeriX LLC) and dose volume histograms (DVH) are calculated. In all cases, the BUS method outperformed the clustering, method. We recommend using the BUS algorithm and discuss potential improvements to the clustering algorithms.

A model for predicting lung cancer response to therapy

PURPOSE

Volumetric computed tomography (CT) images acquired by image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) systems can be used to measure tumor response over the course of treatment. Predictive adaptive therapy is a novel treatment technique that uses volumetric IGRT data to actively predict the future tumor response to therapy during the first few weeks of IGRT treatment. The goal of this study was to develop and test a model for predicting lung tumor response during IGRT treatment using serial megavoltage CT (MVCT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Tumor responses were measured for 20 lung cancer lesions in 17 patients that were imaged and treated with helical tomotherapy with doses ranging from 2.0 to 2.5 Gy per fraction. Five patients were treated with concurrent chemotherapy, and 1 patient was treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Tumor response to treatment was retrospectively measured by contouring 480 serial MVCT images acquired before treatment. A nonparametric, memory-based locally weight regression (LWR) model was developed for predicting tumor response using the retrospective tumor response data. This model predicts future tumor volumes and the associated confidence intervals based on limited observations during the first 2 weeks of treatment. The predictive accuracy of the model was tested using a leave-one-out cross-validation technique with the measured tumor responses.

RESULTS

The predictive algorithm was used to compare predicted verse-measured tumor volume response for all 20 lesions. The average error for the predictions of the final tumor volume was 12%, with the true volumes always bounded by the 95% confidence interval. The greatest model uncertainty occurred near the middle of the course of treatment, in which the tumor response relationships were more complex, the model has less information, and the predictors were more varied. The optimal days for measuring the tumor response on the MVCT images were on elapsed Days 1, 2, 5, 9, 11, 12, 17, and 18 during treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The LWR model accurately predicted final tumor volume for all 20 lung cancer lesions. These predictions were made using only 8 days' worth of observations from early in the treatment. Because the predictions are accurate with quantified uncertainty, they could eventually be used to optimize treatment.

Tomotherapy and other innovative IMRT delivery systems

Fixed-field treatments, delivered using conventional clinical linear accelerators fitted with multileaf collimators, have rapidly become the standard form of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Several innovative nonstandard alternatives also exist, for which delivery and treatment planning systems are now commercially available. Three of these nonstandard IMRT approaches are reviewed here: tomotherapy, robotic linear accelerators (CyberKnife, Accuray Inc., Sunnyvale, CA), and standard linear accelerators modulated by jaws alone or by their jaws acting together with a tertiary beam-masking device. Rationales for the nonstandard IMRT approaches are discussed, and elements of their delivery system designs are briefly described. Differences between fixed-field IMRT dose distributions and the distributions that can be delivered by using the nonstandard technologies are outlined. Because conventional linear accelerators are finely honed machines, innovative design enhancement of one aspect of system performance often limits another facet of machine capability. Consequently the various delivery systems may prove optimal for different types of treatment, with specific machine designs excelling for disease sites with specific target volume and normal structure topologies. However it is likely that the delivery systems will be distinguished not just by the optimality of the dose distributions they deliver, but also by factors such as the efficiency of their treatment process, the integration of their onboard imaging systems into that process, and their ability to measure and minimize or compensate for target movement, including the effects of respiratory motion.

Tomotherapy as a tool in image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): current clinical experience and outcomes

Modern radiotherapy is characterised by a better target definition through medical imaging accompanied by significantly improved radiation delivery methods, most notably Intensity-Modulate Radiation Therapy (IMRT). However, the treatment can only be as accurate as the positioning of patients for their daily radiotherapy fraction. It is in this context that a number of imaging modalities - ranging from ultrasound to on-board kilovoltage imaging and computed tomography (CT) - have found their way into the treatment room where they verify accurate patient positioning prior to or even during delivery of radiation. Helical tomotherapy (HT) combines IMRT delivery with in-built image guidance using megavoltage CT scanning. This paper discusses the initial experience of different centres with IGRT using HT illustrated by a number of clinical examples from the installation in London in Ontario, Canada, one of the world’s first HT sites. We found that HT allows the delivery of highly conformal radiation dose distributions combined with adequate daily image acquisition. An important feature of this unit is its seamless integration, which also includes a customised inverse treatment planning system and a quality assurance module for individual patients.

A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion

Helical tomotherapy (HT) can potentially be used for lung cancer treatment including stereotactic radiosurgery because of its advanced image guidance and its ability to deliver highly conformal dose distributions. However, previous theoretical and simulation studies reported that the effect of respiratory motion on statically planned tomotherapy treatments may cause substantial differences between the calculated and actual delivered radiation isodose distribution, particularly when the treatment is hypofractionated. In order to determine the dosimetric effects of motion upon actual HT treatment delivery, phantom film dosimetry measurements were performed under static and moving conditions using a clinical HT treatment unit. The motion phantom system was constructed using a programmable motor, a base, a moving platform and a life size lung heterogeneity phantom with wood inserts representing lung tissue with a 3.0 cm diameter spherical tumour density equivalent insert. In order to determine the effects of different motion and tomotherapy delivery parameters, treatment plans were created using jaw sizes of 1.04 cm and 2.47 cm, with incremental gantry rotation periods between the minimum allowed (10 s) and the maximum allowed (60 s). The couch speed varied from 0.009 cm s(-1) to 0.049 cm s(-1), and delivered to a phantom under static and dynamic conditions with peak-to-peak motion amplitudes of 1.2 cm and 2 cm and periods of 3 and 5 s to simulate human respiratory motion of lung tumours. A cylindrical clinical target volume (CTV) was contoured to tightly enclose the tumour insert. 2.0 Gy was prescribed to 95% of the CTV. Two-dimensional dose was measured by a Kodak EDR2 film. Dynamic phantom doses were then quantitatively compared to static phantom doses in terms of axial dose profiles, cumulative dose volume histograms (DVH), percentage of CTV receiving the prescription dose and the minimum dose received by 95% of the CTV. The larger motion amplitude resulted in more under-dosing at the ends of the CTV in the axis of motion, and this effect was greater for the smaller jaw size plans. Due to the size of the penumbra, the 2.47 cm jaw plans provide adequate coverage for smaller amplitudes of motion, +/-0.6 cm in our experiment, without adding any additional margin in the axis of motion to the treatment volume. The periodic heterogeneous patterns described by previous studies were not observed from the single fraction of the phantom measurement. Besides the jaw sizes, CTV dose coverage is not significantly dependent on machine and phantom motion periods. The lack of adverse synchronization patterns from both results validate that HT is a safe technique for treating moving target and hypofractionation.

A comparison of prostate IMRT and helical tomotherapy class solutions

The purpose of this study was to assess a variety of potential IMRT class solutions as compared to a helical tomotherapy (HT) class solution for localized prostate cancer. Target and critical structures were contoured on 10 prostate cancer patient CT datasets. HT treatment plans were compared to four different IMRT approaches by paired t-tests. HT prostate planning generally provided treatment plans with excellent target homogeneity and favorable critical structure sparing when compared to conventional IMRT.

History of tomotherapy

Tomotherapy is the delivery of intensity modulated radiation therapy using rotational delivery of a fan beam in the manner of a CT scanner. In helical tomotherapy the couch and gantry are in continuous motion akin to a helical CT scanner. Helical tomotherapy is inherently capable of acquiring CT images of the patient in treatment position and using this information for image guidance. This review documents technological advancements of the field concentrating on the conceptual beginnings through to its first clinical implementation. The history of helical tomotherapy is also a story of technology migration from academic research to a university-industrial partnership, and finally to commercialization and widespread clinical use.

Verification dosimetry during treatment for helical tomotherapy using radiographic film

Helical tomotherapy (HT) is a novel radiotherapy treatment modality that allows the delivery of intensity modulated radiation in a rotational fashion. Due to the complexity of the treatment approach, it is desirable to have a simple tool for treatment delivery verification. Radiographic film placed under the patient is exposed to dose from most of the possible beam projections and therefore constitutes a useful in vivo dosimetry record of the whole treatment. Measurements were performed during the initial clinical implementation of HT at the London Regional Cancer Centre on all patients during the first treatment fraction. It was possible to predict the optical density of the film using a dose calculation on a phantom of similar size to the patient. The comparison of expected and delivered dose allows the verification of dose delivery patterns which was found to be particularly useful in the case of treatment interruptions. The absolute dose measured with film differed in general by less than 10% from the expected one despite the fact that no build-up was used on the film. The agreement improved with proximity of the primary target to the location of the film on the treatment couch. Due to the rotational delivery mode, radiographic film was shown to be a useful, cheap and convenient method to verify dose delivery in helical tomotherapy.

Significant improvement in normal tissue sparing and target coverage for head and neck cancer by means of helical tomotherapy

PURPOSE

In order to explore the potential of helical Tomotherapy in the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNC), a planning study comparing our routinely delivered IMRT technique (dynamic MLC Varian 600CD Linac, inversely optimised by the Helios/Eclipse system) against two different Tomotherapy planning approaches was performed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the first Tomotherapy plan (TOMO-a), we merely applied the same constraints used for the IMRT-Linac technique; in the second one (TOMO-b), we tried to stress the sparing of parotids and mandible while keeping PTV coverage and spinal cord Dmax similar to their values in the TOMO-a plan. Five patients with locally advanced oropharinx (n=3), hypopharinx (n=1) and larynx (n=1) cancer were considered. For each patient, CTV1 including neck nodes and the tumour was defined and was expanded with a margin of 0.5 cm (PTV1); then, CTV2 including high risk nodes and CTV3 including only T were defined and the corresponding PTV2/PTV3 were defined by a 0.5 cm expansion. IMRT and Tomotherapy planning were optimised to deliver 54 Gy in 30 fractions on PTV1 and 16.2 Gy in 9 fractions on PTV3; in the case a PTV2 was defined, 15 Gy were concomitantly delivered while delivering 16.2 Gy on PTV3. Separated plans for the two phases (Phase 1: first 30 fractions; Phase 2: last 9 fractions) were compared in terms of dose-volume histograms (DVH) and dose statistics on PTVs and OARs.

RESULTS

When considering Phase 1, Tomotherapy improved the homogeneity of the dose distribution within PTV1 while delivering the same prescribed dose (assessed to be the median dose to PTV): the fraction of PTV1 receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose (V95%) increased from 90% (IMRT) to 96-97% for Tomotherapy plans. Dmax within PTV1 decreased from 60.3 Gy (IMRT) to 57.4 Gy (TOMO-a) and 58.7 Gy (TOMO-b). Spinal cord Dmax decreased from 31.6 Gy (IMRT) to 26.5 Gy (TOMO-a) and 24.6 Gy (TOMO-b). No attempts to further reduce spinal cord Dmax were done. Mean dose to the parotids decreased from 26.1 Gy (IMRT) to 25.1 Gy (TOMO-a) and 20.8 Gy (TOMO-b). Mandible was significantly better spared with Tomotherapy: mean dose decreased from 34.9 Gy (IMRT) to 34.0 Gy (TOMO-a) and 30.7 Gy (TOMO-b). When considering phase 2, the average gains (TOMO-b vs IMRT) were more modest and depended on the location of PTV2/PTV3.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary findings obtained in a sequential approach for HNC suggest that Tomotherapy has the potential to significantly improve the therapeutic ratio with respect to a conventional IMRT delivery method.

Targeted Total Marrow Irradiation Using Three-Dimensional Image-Guided Tomographic Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy: An Alternative to Standard Total Body Irradiation

Total body irradiation (TBI) is an important part of bone marrow transplantation conditioning regimens. In TBI, dose escalation is difficult, because of associated normal organ toxicities. A method to deliver a more targeted dose of TBI preferentially to sites of greatest tumor burden is needed to reduce the dose to normal organs, reduce toxicities, and permit dose escalation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, through a dosimetric analysis, the potential advantages and feasibility of selectively delivering targeted myeloablative doses of radiation to bone and marrow using a recently developed image-guided tomographic intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery system (helical tomotherapy). Whole-body computed tomography datasets from 3 patients, age 5, 20, and 53 years, were used for treatment planning studies to evaluate 2 targeted TBI strategies: total marrow irradiation (TMI), in which the target region was defined as the skeletal bone, and total marrow and lymphoid irradiation (TMLI), in which the target regions were defined as bone, major lymph node chains, liver, spleen, and sanctuary sites, such as brain. Organ doses and dose distributions were compared with those in conventional TBI. A 1.7- to 7.5-fold reduction in median organ doses was observed with TMI and TMLI compared with conventional TBI. With this more targeted approach, a dose-volume histogram analysis predicted the potential to escalate the dose to bone (and containing marrow) up to 20 Gy, while maintaining doses to normal organs at lower levels than in conventional TBI to 12 Gy. Results were similar for the adult and pediatric patients, indicating that this form of targeted TBI will be applicable to most patients regardless of frame size. TMI to 10 Gy was delivered as part of a tandem transplant regimen to the 53-year-old patient with multiple myeloma. Clinical results confirmed the treatment planning predictions. After TMI, the patient experienced the expected blood count nadir, followed by successful engraftment. Grade 2 nausea and grade 1 emesis occurred only briefly on day 2 of TMI. Skin erythema, oral mucositis, esophagitis, and enteritis were not observed. This report demonstrates the feasibility and potential dosimetric advantages of selectively delivering myeloablative doses of radiation to bone and marrow using an image-guided tomographic intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery system. Organ doses are substantially lower than those associated with standard TBI and predict the potential to significantly reduce associated toxicities and allow for dose escalation. The results also suggest that this form of targeted TBI may have potential advantages over other forms of targeted TBI, such as radioimmunotherapy or bone-seeking radionuclide therapy. Ongoing clinical trials will define the maximum TMI and TMLI doses achievable and define the potential advantages and limitations of this new approach for patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Comparative planning evaluation of intensity-modulatedradiotherapy techniques for complex lung cancer cases

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Lung cancer treatment can be one of the most challenging fields in radiotherapy. The aim of the present study was to compare different modalities of radiation delivery based on a balanced scoring scheme for target coverage and normal tissue avoidance.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment plans were developed for 15 patients with stage III inoperable non-small cell lung cancer using 3D conformal technique and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Elective nodal irradiation was included for all cases to create the most challenging scenarios with large target volumes. A 2 cm margin was used around the gross tumour volume (GTV) to generate PTV2 and 1cm margin around elective nodes for PTV1 resulting in PTV1 volumes larger than 1000 cm(3) in 13 of the 15 patients. 3D conformal and IMRT plans were generated on a commercial treatment planning system (TheraPlan Plus, Nucletron) with various combinations of beam energies and gantry angles. A 'dose quality factor' (DQF) was introduced to correlate the plan quality with patient specific parameters.

RESULTS

A good correlation was found between the quality of the plans and the overlap between PTV1 and lungs. The patient feature factor (PFF), which is a product of several pertinent characteristics, was introduced to facilitate the choice of a particular technique for a particular patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This approach may allow the evaluation of different treatment options prior to actual planning, subject to validation in larger prospective data sets.

Serial megavoltage CT imaging during external beam radiotherapy for non–small-cell lung cancer: Observations on tumor regression during treatment

PURPOSE

The ability to obtain soft-tissue imaging in the treatment room, such as with megavoltage CT imaging, enables the observation of tumor regression during a course of external beam radiation therapy. In this current study, we report on the most extensive study looking at the rate of regression of non-small-cell lung cancers during a course of external beam radiotherapy by analyzing serial megavoltage CT images obtained on 10 patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The analysis is performed on 10 patients treated with the Helical Tomotherapy Hi*Art device. All 10 patients had non-small-cell lung cancer. A total of 274 megavoltage CT sets were obtained on the 10 patients (average, 27 scans per patient; range, 9-35). All patients had at least a scan at beginning and at the end of treatment. The frequency of scanning was determined by the treating physician. The treatment was subsequently delivered with the Tomotherapy Hi*Art system. The gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were later contoured on each megavoltage CT scan, and tumor volumes were calculated. Although some patients were treated to draining nodal areas in addition to the primary tumor, only the primary GTVs were tracked. Response to treatment was quantified by the relative decrease in tumor volume over time, i.e., elapsed days from the first day of therapy. The individual GTVs ranged from 5.9 to 737.2 cc in volume at the start of treatment. In 6 of the 10 patients, dose recalculations were also performed to document potential variations in delivered doses within the tumors. The megavoltage CT scans were used, and the planned treatment was recalculated on the daily images. The hypothesis was that dose deposited in the target would increase throughout the course of radiotherapy because of tumor shrinkage and subsequent decreasing attenuation. Specifically, the dose received by 95% of the GTV (D95) was monitored over time for each of the 6 patients treated at M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Orlando.

RESULTS

Regression of all 10 lung tumors could be observed on the serial megavoltage CT scans. The decrease in volume was observed at a relatively constant rate throughout the treatments, with no obvious initial or final plateaus. For all 10 tumors, the average decrease in volume was 1.2% per day. However, individual tumor regression rates were observed with a range of 0.6% to 2.3% per day. The lowest rate of shrinkage was observed for the smallest lesion, and the highest rate was observed in the largest lesion. Of the 6 cases in which dose recalculations were performed, 5 demonstrated a small but noticeable gradual increase in deposited doses within the tumor, with the D95 increases ranging from 0.02% to 0.1% per day.

CONCLUSION

With the advent of in-room soft-tissue imaging techniques such as megavoltage CT imaging with a helical tomotherapy unit, daily documentation of the status of a grossly visible targeted tumor becomes possible. The current study demonstrated that tumor regression can be documented for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with helical tomotherapy. Clinical correlations between the observations made during the course of treatment and ultimate outcomes, e.g. local control, should be investigated.

Investigation of dose homogeneity for loose helical tomotherapy delivery in the context of breath-hold radiation therapy

Loose helical delivery is a potential solution to account for respiration-driven tumour motion in helical tomotherapy (HT). In this approach, a treatment is divided into a set of interlaced 'loose' helices commencing at different gantry angles. Each loose helix covers the entire target length in one gantry rotation during a single breath-hold. The dosimetric characteristics of loose helical delivery were investigated by delivering a 6 MV photon beam in a HT-like manner. Multiple scenarios of conventional 'tight' HT and loose helical deliveries were modelled in treatment planning software, and carried out experimentally with Kodak EDR2 film. The advantage of loose helical delivery lies in its ability to produce a more homogeneous dose distribution by eliminating the 'thread' effect-an inherent characteristic of HT, which results in dose modulations away from the axis of gantry rotation. However, loose helical delivery was also subjected to undesirable dose modulations in the direction of couch motion (termed 'beating' effect), when the ratio between the number of beam projections per gantry rotation (n) and pitch factor (p) was a non-integer. The magnitude of dose modulations decreased with an increasing n/p ratio. The results suggest that for the current HT unit (n = 51), dose modulations could be kept under 5% by selecting a pitch factor smaller than 7. A pitch factor of this magnitude should be able to treat a target up to 30 cm in length. Loose helical delivery should increase the total session time only by a factor of 2, while the planning time should stay the same since the total number of beam projections remains unchanged. Considering its dosimetric advantage and clinical practicality, loose helical delivery is a promising solution for the future HT treatments of respiration-driven targets.