Tolerance to missing data using a likelihood ratio based classifier for computer-aided classification of breast cancer

Automated breast mass detection in 3D reconstructed tomosynthesis volumes: a featureless approach

The purpose of this study was to propose and implement a computer aided detection (CADe) tool for breast tomosynthesis. This task was accomplished in two stages-a highly sensitive mass detector followed by a false positive (FP) reduction stage. Breast tomosynthesis data from 100 human subject cases were used, of which 25 subjects had one or more mass lesions and the rest were normal. For stage 1, filter parameters were optimized via a grid search. The CADe identified suspicious locations were reconstructed to yield 3D CADe volumes of interest. The first stage yielded a maximum sensitivity of 93% with 7.7 FPs/breast volume. Unlike traditional CADe algorithms in which the second stage FP reduction is done via feature extraction and analysis, instead information theory principles were used with mutual information as a similarity metric. Three schemes were proposed, all using leave-one-case-out cross validation sampling. The three schemes, A, B, and C, differed in the composition of their knowledge base of regions of interest (ROIs). Scheme A's knowledge base was comprised of all the mass and FP ROIs generated by the first stage of the algorithm. Scheme B had a knowledge base that contained information from mass ROIs and randomly extracted normal ROIs. Scheme C had information from three sources of information-masses, FPs, and normal ROIs. Also, performance was assessed as a function of the composition of the knowledge base in terms of the number of FP or normal ROIs needed by the system to reach optimal performance. The results indicated that the knowledge base needed no more than 20 times as many FPs and 30 times as many normal ROIs as masses to attain maximal performance. The best overall system performance was 85% sensitivity with 2.4 FPs per breast volume for scheme A, 3.6 FPs per breast volume for scheme B, and 3 FPs per breast volume for scheme C.

Optimized approach to decision fusion of heterogeneous data for breast cancer diagnosis

As more diagnostic testing options become available to physicians, it becomes more difficult to combine various types of medical information together in order to optimize the overall diagnosis. To improve diagnostic performance, here we introduce an approach to optimize a decision-fusion technique to combine heterogeneous information, such as from different modalities, feature categories, or institutions. For classifier comparison we used two performance metrics: The receiving operator characteristic (ROC) area under the curve [area under the ROC curve (AUC)] and the normalized partial area under the curve (pAUC). This study used four classifiers: Linear discriminant analysis (LDA), artificial neural network (ANN), and two variants of our decision-fusion technique, AUC-optimized (DF-A) and pAUC-optimized (DF-P) decision fusion. We applied each of these classifiers with 100-fold cross-validation to two heterogeneous breast cancer data sets: One of mass lesion features and a much more challenging one of microcalcification lesion features. For the calcification data set, DF-A outperformed the other classifiers in terms of AUC (p < 0.02) and achieved AUC=0.85 +/- 0.01. The DF-P surpassed the other classifiers in terms of pAUC (p < 0.01) and reached pAUC=0.38 +/- 0.02. For the mass data set, DF-A outperformed both the ANN and the LDA (p < 0.04) and achieved AUC=0.94 +/- 0.01. Although for this data set there were no statistically significant differences among the classifiers' pAUC values (pAUC=0.57 +/- 0.07 to 0.67 +/- 0.05, p > 0.10), the DF-P did significantly improve specificity versus the LDA at both 98% and 100% sensitivity (p < 0.04). In conclusion, decision fusion directly optimized clinically significant performance measures, such as AUC and pAUC, and sometimes outperformed two well-known machine-learning techniques when applied to two different breast cancer data sets.

Computer aid for decision to biopsy breast masses on mammography: validation on new cases

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to validate the performance of a previously developed computer aid for breast mass classification for mammography on a new, independent database of cases not used for algorithm development.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A computer aid (classifier) based on the likelihood ratio (LRb) was previously developed on a database of 670 mass cases. The 670 cases (245 malignant) from one medical institution were described using 16 features from the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System lexicon and patient history findings. A separate database of 151 (43 malignant) validation cases were collected that were previously unseen by the classifier. These new validation cases were evaluated by the classifier without retraining. Performance evaluation methods included Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC), round-robin, and leave-one-out bootstrap sampling.

RESULTS

The performance of the classifier on the training data yielded an average ROC area of 0.90 +/- 0.02 and partial ROC area (0.90AUC) of 0.60 +/- 0.06. The exact nonparametric performance on the validation set of 151 cases yielded a ROC area of 0.88 and 0.90AUC of 0.57. Using a 100% sensitivity cutoff threshold established on the training data (100% negative predictive value), the classifier correctly identified 100% of the malignant masses in the validation test set, while potentially obviating 26% of the biopsies performed on benign masses.

CONCLUSION

The LRb classifier performed consistently on new data that was not used for classifier development. The LRb classifier shows promise as a potential aid in reducing the number of biopsies performed on benign masses.