1
|
Roberts J, Moggre A, Meyer J, Marsh S. Simulation-guided development of an optical calorimeter for high dose rate dosimetry. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:143-151. [PMID: 37938519 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01349-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
Optical Calorimetry (OC) is based on interferometry and provides a direct measurement of spatially resolved absorbed dose to water by measuring refractive index changes induced by radiation. The purpose of this work was to optimize and characterize in software an OC system tailored for ultra-high dose rate applications and to build and test a prototype in a clinical environment. A radiation dosimeter using the principles of OC was designed in optical modelling software. Traditional image quality instruments, fencepost and contrast phantoms, were utilized both in software and experimentally in a lab environment to investigate noise reduction techniques and to test the spatial and dose resolution of the system. Absolute dose uncertainty was assessed by measurements in a clinical 6 MV Flattening Filter Free (FFF) photon beam with dose rates in the range 0.2-6 Gy/s achieved via changing the distance from the source. Design improvements included: equalizing the pathlengths of the interferometer, isolating the system from external vibrations and controlling the system's internal temperature as well as application of mathematical noise reduction techniques. Simulations showed that these improvements should increase the spatial resolution from 22 to 35 lp/mm and achieve a minimum detectable dose of 0.2 Gy, which was confirmed experimentally. In the FFF beam, the absolute dose uncertainty was dose rate dependent and decreased from 2.5 ± 0.8 to 2.5 ± 0.2 Gy for dose rates of 0.2 and 6 Gy/s, respectively. A radiation dosimeter utilizing the principles of OC was developed and constructed. Optical modelling software and image quality phantoms allowed for iterative testing and refinement. The refined OC system proved capable of measuring absorbed dose to water in a linac generated photon beam. Reduced uncertainty at higher dose rates indicates the potential for OC as a dosimetry system for high dose rate techniques such as microbeam and ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson Roberts
- School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand.
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Te Whatu Ora - Waitaha, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand.
| | - Alicia Moggre
- Medical Physics and Bioengineering, Te Whatu Ora - Waitaha, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
| | - Juergen Meyer
- School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Steven Marsh
- School of Physical and Chemical Sciences, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holm KM, Jäkel O, Krauss A. Direct determination of k
Q
for Farmer-type ionization chambers in a clinical scanned carbon-ion beam using water calorimetry. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4fa0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Within two studies, k
Q
factors for two Farmer-type ionization chambers have been experimentally determined by means of water calorimetry in the entrance channel (EC) of a monoenergetic carbon-ion beam (Osinga-Blättermann et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol.
62 2033–54) and for a passively modulated spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) (Holm et al 2021 Phys. Med. Biol.
66 145012). Both studies were performed at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT) using the PTB portable water calorimeter but applying different initial beam energies of 429 MeV u−1 for the EC and 278 MeV u−1 for the SOBP as well as different scanning patterns of the irradiated field. Comparing their results revealed differences between the experimental k
Q
factors of up to 1.9% between the EC and the SOBP. To further investigate this unexpected difference, we performed additional k
Q
determinations for the EC of an 278 MeV u−1 monoenergetic carbon-ion beam and reevaluated the original data of Osinga-Blättermann et al (2017 Phys. Med. Biol.
62 2033–54). This new experimental data indicated no difference between the k
Q
factors for the EC and the SOBP and the reevaluation led to a substantial reduction of the originally published k
Q
factors for the EC of the 429 MeV u−1 beam (Osinga-Blättermann et al 2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 2033–54). Finally, no significant difference between the data for the EC and the data for the SOBP can be found within the standard measurement uncertainty of experimental k
Q
factors of 0.8%. The results presented here are intended to correct and replace the k
Q
data published by Osinga-Blättermann et al (2017 Phys. Med. Biol. 62 2033–54) and in Osinga-Blättermann and Krauss (2018 Phys. Med. Biol.
64 015009).
Collapse
|
3
|
Holm KM, Jäkel O, Krauss A. Water calorimetry-based kQfactors for Farmer-type ionization chambers in the SOBP of a carbon-ion beam. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34153952 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac0d0d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
The dosimetry of carbon-ion beams based on calibrated ionization chambers (ICs) still shows a significantly higher uncertainty compared to high-energy photon beams, a fact influenced mainly by the uncertainty of the correction factor for the beam qualitykQ. Due to a lack of experimental data,kQfactors in carbon-ion beams used today are based on theoretical calculations whose standard uncertainty is three times higher than that of photon beams. To reduce their uncertainty, in this work,kQfactors for two ICs were determined experimentally by means of water calorimetry for the spread-out Bragg peak of a carbon-ion beam, these factors are presented here for the first time. To this end, the absorbed dose to water in the12C-SOBP is measured using the water calorimeter developed at Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, allowing a direct calibration of the ICs used (PTW 30013 and IBA FC65G) and thereby an experimental determination of the chamber-specifickQfactors. Based on a detailed characterization of the irradiation field, correction factors for several effects that influence calorimetric and ionometric measurements were determined. Their contribution to an overall uncertainty budget of the finalkQfactors was determined, leading to a standard uncertainty forkQof 0.69%, which means a reduction by a factor of three compared to the theoretically calculated values. The experimentally determined values were expressed in accordance with TRS-398 and DIN 6801-1 and compared to the values given there. A maximum deviation of 2.3% was found between the experiment and the literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim Marina Holm
- Department of Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), University Hospital Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Achim Krauss
- Department of Dosimetry for Radiation Therapy and Diagnostic Radiology, Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Holm KM, Weber U, Simeonov Y, Krauss A, Jäkel O, Greilich S. 2D range modulator for high-precision water calorimetry in scanned carbon-ion beams. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:215003. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aba6d5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
5
|
Renaud J, Palmans H, Sarfehnia A, Seuntjens J. Absorbed dose calorimetry. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:05TR02. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab4f29] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
6
|
Giordanengo S, Palmans H. Dose detectors, sensors, and their applications. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1051-e1072. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Giordanengo
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Section of Torino Via Giuria 1 10125 Torino Italy
| | - Hugo Palmans
- National Physical Laboratory Medical Radiation Science Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex TW11 0LW UK
- EBG MedAustron GmbH Marie‐Curiestraße 5 A‐2700 Wiener Neustadt Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Osinga-Blättermann JM, Brons S, Greilich S, Jäkel O, Krauss A. Direct determination of k Q for Farmer-type ionization chambers in a clinical scanned carbon ion beam using water calorimetry. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:2033-2054. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5bac] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Durante M, Paganetti H. Nuclear physics in particle therapy: a review. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. PHYSICAL SOCIETY (GREAT BRITAIN) 2016; 79:096702. [PMID: 27540827 DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Charged particle therapy has been largely driven and influenced by nuclear physics. The increase in energy deposition density along the ion path in the body allows reducing the dose to normal tissues during radiotherapy compared to photons. Clinical results of particle therapy support the physical rationale for this treatment, but the method remains controversial because of the high cost and of the lack of comparative clinical trials proving the benefit compared to x-rays. Research in applied nuclear physics, including nuclear interactions, dosimetry, image guidance, range verification, novel accelerators and beam delivery technologies, can significantly improve the clinical outcome in particle therapy. Measurements of fragmentation cross-sections, including those for the production of positron-emitting fragments, and attenuation curves are needed for tuning Monte Carlo codes, whose use in clinical environments is rapidly increasing thanks to fast calculation methods. Existing cross sections and codes are indeed not very accurate in the energy and target regions of interest for particle therapy. These measurements are especially urgent for new ions to be used in therapy, such as helium. Furthermore, nuclear physics hardware developments are frequently finding applications in ion therapy due to similar requirements concerning sensors and real-time data processing. In this review we will briefly describe the physics bases, and concentrate on the open issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Povo (TN), Italy. Department of Physics, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Renaud J, Rossomme S, Sarfehnia A, Vynckier S, Palmans H, Kacperek A, Seuntjens J. Development and application of a water calorimeter for the absolute dosimetry of short-range particle beams. Phys Med Biol 2016; 61:6602-6619. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/18/6602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
10
|
Palmans H, Al-Sulaiti L, Andreo P, Shipley D, Lühr A, Bassler N, Martinkovič J, Dobrovodský J, Rossomme S, Thomas RAS, Kacperek A. Fluence correction factors for graphite calorimetry in a low-energy clinical proton beam: I. Analytical and Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:3481-99. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/10/3481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
11
|
Krauss A, Büermann L, Kramer HM, Selbach HJ. Calorimetric determination of the absorbed dose to water for medium-energy x-rays with generating voltages from 70 to 280 kV. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:6245-68. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/19/6245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Abstract
Recently, ion beam radiotherapy (including protons as well as heavier ions) gained considerable interest. Although ion beam radiotherapy requires dose prescription in terms of iso-effective dose (referring to an iso-effective photon dose), absorbed dose is still required as an operative quantity to control beam delivery, to characterize the beam dosimetrically and to verify dose delivery. This paper reviews current methods and standards to determine absorbed dose to water in ion beam radiotherapy, including (i) the detectors used to measure absorbed dose, (ii) dosimetry under reference conditions and (iii) dosimetry under non-reference conditions. Due to the LET dependence of the response of films and solid-state detectors, dosimetric measurements are mostly based on ion chambers. While a primary standard for ion beam radiotherapy still remains to be established, ion chamber dosimetry under reference conditions is based on similar protocols as for photons and electrons although the involved uncertainty is larger than for photon beams. For non-reference conditions, dose measurements in tissue-equivalent materials may also be necessary. Regarding the atomic numbers of the composites of tissue-equivalent phantoms, special requirements have to be fulfilled for ion beams. Methods for calibrating the beam monitor depend on whether passive or active beam delivery techniques are used. QA measurements are comparable to conventional radiotherapy; however, dose verification is usually single field rather than treatment plan based. Dose verification for active beam delivery techniques requires the use of multi-channel dosimetry systems to check the compliance of measured and calculated dose for a representative sample of measurement points. Although methods for ion beam dosimetry have been established, there is still room for developments. This includes improvement of the dosimetric accuracy as well as development of more efficient measurement techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sarfehnia A, Clasie B, Chung E, Lu HM, Flanz J, Cascio E, Engelsman M, Paganetti H, Seuntjens J. Direct absorbed dose to water determination based on water calorimetry in scanning proton beam delivery. Med Phys 2010; 37:3541-50. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3427317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|