Comparison of dose distributions around the pulsed-dose-rate Fletcher–Williamson and the low-dose-rate Fletcher–Suit–Delclos ovoids: a Monte Carlo study

Direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator for cervical cancer treatment: Choosing the optimal shielding material

PURPOSE

To investigate the dose modulation capability of a novel MRI-compatible direction modulated brachytherapy (DMBT) tandem applicator design with various high-density shielding materials for brachytherapy treatment of cervical cancer. The shield materials that have been evaluated are tantalum (Ta), pure tungsten (W), gold (Au), rhenium (Re), osmium (Os), platinum (Pt), iridium (Ir), and W' tungsten alloy (95%W, 3.5%Ni, 1.5%Cu).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The recently proposed six-channel DMBT tandem is composed of nonmagnetic tungsten alloy (W') rod with diameter of 5.4 mm and coated with 0.3-mm thick bio-safe plastic sheath. The tandem shielding material can, however, be individually replaced with various other shields to create directional radiation. Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) code was used to calculate the three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions in a water phantom for an HDR 192 Ir (mHDR-v2) source inside each DMBT tandem with various shields and a plastic conventional tandem (Con.T). Then, the 3D dose distributions were imported into an in-house-coded inverse planning optimization algorithm to obtain optimal plans for 12 clinical cases chosen at random from the international RetroEMBRACE dataset involving conventional tandem and ring (Con.T&R) applicators. All plans generated by the DMBT tandem and ring (DMBT&R) with the tungsten alloy [DMBT(W')&R] were compared with the corresponding Con.T&R plans, to generate benchmark results. These benchmark results were then considered as reference plans for other shields performances. Plans were normalized to receive the same high-risk clinical target volume (CTVHR ) D90 . The D100 , D10 , and V100 for CTVHR , and D2cm3 for organs at risk (OARs) of bladder, sigmoid, and rectum were calculated and compared.

RESULTS

Transmission factor (TF), that is, the dose in the backside of the DMBT shield over that in the front opening, at a 5 cm distance, were 36.6%, 34.8%, 31.9%, 28.9%, 27.9%, 26.2%, 26.2%, and 25.5%, for Ta, W', W, Re, Au, Os, Pt, and Ir shields, respectively. On average, the CTVHR values for D100 , V100 , D10 were not significantly different across all DMBT&R shields and the Con.T&R plans (P > 0.219). For the D2cm3 , the benchmark results showed significant reductions (P < 0.03), that is, on average, -8.3% for bladder, -10.7% for rectum, and -10.1% for sigmoid, compared to the Con.T&R plans. However, the various shields showed little improvement from the tungsten alloy (W'), where on average, rectum (bladder) [sigmoid] D2cm3 were reduced by -1.32% (-0.85%) [-1.01%], -1.25% (-0.78%) [-0.91%], -1.22% (-0.75%) [-0.86%], -0.94% (-0.60%) [-0.70%], -0.84% (-0.51%) [-0.59%], and -0.38% (-0.24%) [-0.23%] for Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shields, relative to the benchmark W' DMBT plans, respectively. These corresponding values for Ta increased by +0.28% (+0.08%) [+0.25%], respectively.

CONCLUSION

The Ir, Pt, Os, Au, Re, and W shielding materials, respectively, in descending order, lead to better OAR sparing than the DMBT(W')&R plans. However, the amount of improvement is limited and clinically insignificant. This finding suggests that the initial W' shield remains a suitable choice given the proven MR compatibility, for use in MR-guided adaptive brachytherapy of cervical cancer.

The use of tetrahedral mesh geometries in Monte Carlo simulation of applicator based brachytherapy dose distributions

Accounting for brachytherapy applicator attenuation is part of the recommendations from the recent report of AAPM Task Group 186. To do so, model based dose calculation algorithms require accurate modelling of the applicator geometry. This can be non-trivial in the case of irregularly shaped applicators such as the Fletcher Williamson gynaecological applicator or balloon applicators with possibly irregular shapes employed in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) performed using electronic brachytherapy sources (EBS). While many of these applicators can be modelled using constructive solid geometry (CSG), the latter may be difficult and time-consuming. Alternatively, these complex geometries can be modelled using tessellated geometries such as tetrahedral meshes (mesh geometries (MG)). Recent versions of Monte Carlo (MC) codes Geant4 and MCNP6 allow for the use of MG. The goal of this work was to model a series of applicators relevant to brachytherapy using MG. Applicators designed for (192)Ir sources and 50 kV EBS were studied; a shielded vaginal applicator, a shielded Fletcher Williamson applicator and an APBI balloon applicator. All applicators were modelled in Geant4 and MCNP6 using MG and CSG for dose calculations. CSG derived dose distributions were considered as reference and used to validate MG models by comparing dose distribution ratios. In general agreement within 1% for the dose calculations was observed for all applicators between MG and CSG and between codes when considering volumes inside the 25% isodose surface. When compared to CSG, MG required longer computation times by a factor of at least 2 for MC simulations using the same code. MCNP6 calculation times were more than ten times shorter than Geant4 in some cases. In conclusion we presented methods allowing for high fidelity modelling with results equivalent to CSG. To the best of our knowledge MG offers the most accurate representation of an irregular APBI balloon applicator.

Pilot study of a computed tomography-compatible shielded intracavitary brachytherapy applicator for treatment of cervical cancer

PURPOSE

The traditional Fletcher-Williamson tandem and ovoid brachytherapy applicators for treatment of cervical cancer have ovoid shields that reduce the dose to the bladder and rectum. However, these shields produce artifact on computed tomography (CT) that prevents acquisition of high-quality images. To address this limitation, we designed and tested a novel CT-compatible applicator with movable shields, called MDA(3).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifteen patients with stage IB1-IIB cervical cancer requiring definitive radiation therapy were enrolled in a prospective pilot study to evaluate image quality with the MDA(3). Image quality was assessed by comparing an initial scan obtained with the shields shifted to minimize shield artifact to a second scan obtained with the shields in treatment position. The 2 scans were then compared by a radiation oncologist blinded to the image source. In addition, image quality was assessed by analysis of Hounsfield values in the normal tissues.

RESULTS

The MDA(3) was successfully employed for intracavitary brachytherapy in 15 patients. CT images obtained with the shields shifted were superior to CT images obtained with the shields in treatment position in every case as evaluated by the radiation oncologist (P < .0001). The presence of the shields in the treatment position significantly increased the mean Hounsfield values within the bladder (P = .002) and rectum (P = .001) due to high-density image artifact.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel applicator provides a clinically feasible solution to overcome the limitation of lack of ovoid shields on currently available CT-compatible applicators.

Dose perturbation due to the polysulfone cap surrounding a Fletcher-Williamson colpostat

We conducted a Monte Carlo evaluation of the dosimetric impact of the polysulfone cap used with the Fletcher‐Williamson (FW) colpostat for I192r high‐dose rate and pulsed‐dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy. Polysulfone caps with diameters of 30 mm, 25 mm, 20 mm, and 16 mm (mini‐ovoid) were simulated, and the absorbed dose rate in surrounding water was calculated and compared to the dose rate calculated for a bare I192r source in water. The dose perturbation depended on the cap diameter, distance away from the cap surface, and angular position around the cap. The largest dose rate reductions were found to be where the cap is thickest, in the general direction of the tumor bed. The range of perturbation mainly from the polysulfone cap over all depths and cap diameters was +2.8% (dose enhancement) to −6.8% (dose reduction); this perturbation is separate from the well‐documented attenuation of the rectal and bladder tungsten shields of the colpostat. Based on the impact of the polysulfone cape, the FW colpostat cap's material composition should be modified to reduce this dosimetric effect, or brachytherapy treatment planning dose algorithms should be improved to account for this perturbation.

PACS numbers: 87.10.Rt 87.53.‐j 87.53.Bn 87.53.Jw