Comparison of PENELOPE Monte Carlo dose calculations with Fricke dosimeter and ionization chamber measurements in heterogeneous phantoms (18 MeV electron and 12 MV photon beams)

Out-of-Field Dose Calculation by a Commercial Treatment Planning System and Comparison by Monte Carlo Simulation for Varian TrueBeam®

PURPOSE

The calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems (TPSs) drops drastically when the points outside the field edges are considered. The real accuracy of a TPS and linear accelerator (linac) combination for regions outside the field edge is a subject which demands more study. In this study, the accuracy of out-of-field dose calculated by a TPS, used with a TrueBeam® (TB) linac, is quantified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

For dose calculation, Eclipse™ version 13.7 commissioned for TB machine was used. For comparison, Monte Carlo (MC) methods, as well as the measurements, were used. The VirtuaLinac, a Geant 4-based MC program which is offered as a cloud solution, is used for the generation of input phase-space (PS) files. This PS file was imported into PRIMO (PENELOPE based MC program) for the simulation of out-of-field dose.

RESULTS

In this study, the accuracy of the out-of-field dose calculated by a TPS for a TB linac was estimated. As per the results in comparison with MC simulations, the TPS underestimated the dose by around 45% on an average for the off-axis-distance range considered in this study. As the off-axis distance increased, the underestimation of the dose also increased.

CONCLUSION

In this work, it was observed that the TPS underestimates doses beyond the edges of treatment fields for a clinical treatment executed on a TB machine. This indicates that the out-of-field dose from TPSs should only be used with a clear understanding of the inaccuracy of dose calculations beyond the edge of the field.

Dosimetry parameters of the IRH10 192Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source

The dosimetry parameters of the IRH10 (192)Ir high dose rate brachytherapy source were obtained from the dose calculation formalism recommended in the AAPM Task Group No. 43 report using the Monte Carlo code PENELOPE. The absorbed doses to water and air originating from the photons of the IRH10 (192)Ir brachytherapy source were calculated by the collision kerma approximation. The dose rate constant was evaluated to be (1.110 +/- 0.011) cGy/h U(-1). The dose rate per unit air kerma strength around the (192)Ir IRH10 brachytherapy source and the anisotropy function were given in tables and figures.

Simulação computacional de um feixe de fótons de 6 MV em diferentes meios heterogêneos utilizando o código PENELOPE

OBJETIVO: Utilizar o código PENELOPE e desenvolver geometrias onde estão presentes heterogeneidades para simular o comportamento do feixe de fótons nessas condições. MATERIAIS E MÉTODOS: Foram feitas simulações do comportamento da radiação ionizante para o caso homogêneo, apenas água, e para os casos heterogêneos, com diferentes materiais. Consideraram-se geometrias cúbicas para os fantomas e geometrias em forma de paralelepípedos para as heterogeneidades com a seguinte composição: tecido simulador de osso e pulmão, seguindo recomendações da International Commission on Radiological Protection, e titânio, alumínio e prata. Definiram-se, como parâmetros de entrada: a energia e o tipo de partícula da fonte, 6 MV de fótons; a distância fonte-superfície de 100 cm; e o campo de radiação de 10x 10 cm². RESULTADOS: Obtiveram-se curvas de percentual de dose em profundidade para todos os casos. Observou-se que em materiais com densidade eletrônica alta, como a prata, a dose absorvida é maior em relação à dose absorvida no fantoma homogêneo, enquanto no tecido simulador de pulmão a dose é menor. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados obtidos demonstram a importância de se considerar heterogeneidades nos algoritmos dos sistemas de planejamento usados no cálculo da distribuição de dose nos pacientes, evitando-se sub ou superdosagem dos tecidos próximos às heterogeneidades.

Evaluation of PENFAST--a fast Monte Carlo code for dose calculations in photon and electron radiotherapy treatment planning

The aim of the present study is to demonstrate the potential of accelerated dose calculations, using the fast Monte Carlo (MC) code referred to as PENFAST, rather than the conventional MC code PENELOPE, without losing accuracy in the computed dose. For this purpose, experimental measurements of dose distributions in homogeneous and inhomogeneous phantoms were compared with simulated results using both PENELOPE and PENFAST. The simulations and experiments were performed using a Saturne 43 linac operated at 12 MV (photons), and at 18 MeV (electrons). Pre-calculated phase space files (PSFs) were used as input data to both the PENELOPE and PENFAST dose simulations. Since depth-dose and dose profile comparisons between simulations and measurements in water were found to be in good agreement (within +/-1% to 1 mm), the PSF calculation is considered to have been validated. In addition, measured dose distributions were compared to simulated results in a set of clinically relevant, inhomogeneous phantoms, consisting of lung and bone heterogeneities in a water tank. In general, the PENFAST results agree to within a 1% to 1 mm difference with those produced by PENELOPE, and to within a 2% to 2 mm difference with measured values. Our study thus provides a pre-clinical validation of the PENFAST code. It also demonstrates that PENFAST provides accurate results for both photon and electron beams, equivalent to those obtained with PENELOPE. CPU time comparisons between both MC codes show that PENFAST is generally about 9-21 times faster than PENELOPE.