1
|
Paschal HM(P, Kabat CN, Martin T, Saenz D, Myers P, Rasmussen K, Stathakis S, Bonnen M, Papanikolaou N, Kirby N. Dosimetric characterization of a new surface-conforming electron MLC prototype. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14173. [PMID: 37858985 PMCID: PMC10860448 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose is to reduce normal tissue radiation toxicity for electron therapy through the creation of a surface-conforming electron multileaf collimator (SCEM). The SCEM combines the benefits of skin collimation, electron conformal radiotherapy, and modulated electron radiotherapy. An early concept for the SCEM was constructed. It consists of leaves that protrude towards the patient, allowing the leaves to conform closely to irregular patient surfaces. The leaves are made of acrylic to decrease bremsstrahlung, thereby decreasing the out-of-field dose. Water tank scans were performed with the SCEM in place for various field sizes for all available electron energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV) with a 0.5 cm air gap to the water surface at 100 cm source-to-surface distance (SSD). These measurements were compared with Cerrobend cutouts with the field size-matched at 100 and 110 cm SSD. Output factor measurements were taken in solid water for each energy at dmax for both the cerrobend cutouts and SCEM at 100 cm SSD. Percent depth dose (PDD) curves for the SCEM shifted shallower for all energies and field sizes. The SCEM also produced a higher surface dose relative to Cerrobend cutouts, with the maximum being a 9.8% increase for the 3 cm × 9 cm field at 9 MeV. When compared to the Cerrobend cutouts at 110 cm SSD, the SCEM showed a significant decrease in the penumbra, particularly for lower energies (i.e., 6 and 9 MeV). The SCEM also showed reduced out-of-field dose and lower bremsstrahlung production than the Cerrobend cutouts. The SCEM provides significant improvement in the penumbra and out-of-field dose by allowing collimation close to the skin surface compared to Cerrobend cutouts. However, the added scatter from the SCEM increases shallow PDD values. Future work will focus on reducing this scatter while maintaining the penumbra and out-of-field benefits the SCEM has over conventional collimation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly M. (Parenica) Paschal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Christopher N. Kabat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Thomas Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Daniel Saenz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Pamela Myers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Karl Rasmussen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Sotirios Stathakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Mark Bonnen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Nikos Papanikolaou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| | - Neil Kirby
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of MedicineThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioSan AntonioTexasUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guyer G, Mueller S, Mackeprang PH, Frei D, Volken W, Aebersold DM, Loessl K, Manser P, Fix MK. Delivery time reduction for mixed photon-electron radiotherapy by using photon MLC collimated electron arcs. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:215009. [PMID: 37816376 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad021a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 10/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Electron arcs in mixed-beam radiotherapy (Arc-MBRT) consisting of intensity-modulated electron arcs with dynamic gantry rotation potentially reduce the delivery time compared to mixed-beam radiotherapy containing electron beams with static gantry angle (Static-MBRT). This study aims to develop and investigate a treatment planning process (TPP) for photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) based Arc-MBRT.Approach. An existing TPP for Static-MBRT plans is extended to integrate electron arcs with a dynamic gantry rotation and intensity modulation using a sliding window technique. The TPP consists of a manual setup of electron arcs, and either static photon beams or photon arcs, shortening of the source-to-surface distance for the electron arcs, initial intensity modulation optimization, selection of a user-defined number of electron beam energies based on dose contribution to the target volume and finally, simultaneous photon and electron intensity modulation optimization followed by full Monte Carlo dose calculation. Arc-MBRT plans, Static-MBRT plans, and photon-only plans were created and compared for four breast cases. Dosimetric validation of two Arc-MBRT plans was performed using film measurements.Main results. The generated Arc-MBRT plans are dosimetrically similar to the Static-MBRT plans while outperforming the photon-only plans. The mean heart dose is reduced by 32% on average in the MBRT plans compared to the photon-only plans. The estimated delivery times of the Arc-MBRT plans are similar to the photon-only plans but less than half the time of the Static-MBRT plans. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree with a gamma passing rate of over 98% (3% global, 2 mm) for both delivered Arc-MBRT plans.Significance. A TPP for Arc-MBRT is successfully developed and Arc-MBRT plans showed the potential to improve the dosimetric plan quality similar as Static-MBRT while maintaining short delivery times of photon-only treatments. This further facilitates integration of pMLC-based MBRT into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Paul-Henry Mackeprang
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Werner Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kristina Loessl
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Heng VJ, Serban M, Renaud MA, Freeman C, Seuntjens J. Robust mixed electron-photon radiation therapy planning for soft tissue sarcoma. Med Phys 2023; 50:6502-6513. [PMID: 37681990 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 08/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mixed electron-photon beam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an emerging technique in which external electron and photon beams are simultaneously optimized into a single treatment plan. MBRT exploits the steep dose falloff and high surface dose of electrons while maintaining target conformity by leveraging the sharp penumbra of photons. PURPOSE This study investigates the dosimetric benefits of MBRT for soft tissue sarcoma (STS) patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective cohort of 22 STS of the lower extremity treated with conventional photon-based Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) were replanned with MBRT. Both VMAT and MBRT treatments were planned on the Varian TrueBeam linac using the Millenium multi-leaf collimator. No electron applicator, cutout or additional collimating devices were used for electron beams of MBRT plans. MBRT plans were optimized to use a combination of 6 MV photons and five electron energies (6, 9, 12, 16, 20 MeV) by a robust column generation algorithm. Electron beams in this study were planned at standard 100 cm source-axis distance (SAD). The dose to the clinical target volume (CTV), bone, normal tissue strip and other organs-at-risk (OARs) were compared using a Wilcoxon signed-rank test. RESULTS As part of the original VMAT treatment, tissue-equivalent bolus was required in 10 of the 22 patients. MBRT plans did not require bolus by virtue of the higher electron entrance dose. CTV coverage by the prescription dose was found to be clinically equivalent between plans of either modality:V 50Gy $V_{\text{50Gy}}$ (MBRT) = 97.9 ± 0.2% versusV 50Gy $V_{\text{50Gy}}$ (VMAT) = 98.1 ± 0.6% (p=0.34). Evaluating the absolute paired difference between doses to OARs in MBRT and VMAT plans, we observed lowerV 20Gy $V_{\text{20Gy}}$ to normal tissue in MBRT plans by 14.9 ± 3.2% (p < 10 - 6 $p<10^{-6}$ ). Similarly,V 50Gy $V_{\text{50Gy}}$ to bone was found to be decreased by 8.2 ± 4.0% (p < 10 - 3 $p<10^{-3}$ ) of the bone volume. CONCLUSION For STS with subcutaneous involvement, MBRT offers statistically significant sparing of OARs without sacrificing target coverage when compared to VMAT. MBRT plans are deliverable on conventional linacs without the use of electron applicators, shortened source-to-surface distance (SSD) or bolus. This study shows that MBRT is a logistically feasible technique with clear dosimetric benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veng Jean Heng
- Department of Physics and Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Monica Serban
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | | | - Jan Seuntjens
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
- Gerald Bronfman Department of Oncology, Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fix MK, Frei D, Mueller S, Guyer G, Loebner HA, Volken W, Manser P. Auto-commissioning of a Monte Carlo electron beam model with application to photon MLC shaped electron fields. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36716491 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
Objective.Presently electron beam treatments are delivered using dedicated applicators. An alternative is the usage of the already installed photon multileaf collimator (pMLC) enabling efficient electron treatments. Currently, the commissioning of beam models is a manual and time-consuming process. In this work an auto-commissioning procedure for the Monte Carlo (MC) beam model part representing the beam above the pMLC is developed for TrueBeam systems with electron energies from 6 to 22 MeV.Approach.The analytical part of the electron beam model includes a main source representing the primary beam and a jaw source representing the head scatter contribution each consisting of an electron and a photon component, while MC radiation transport is performed for the pMLC. The auto-commissioning of this analytical part relies on information pre-determined from MC simulations, in-air dose profiles and absolute dose measurements in water for different field sizes and source to surface distances (SSDs). For validation calculated and measured dose distributions in water were compared for different field sizes, SSDs and beam energies for eight TrueBeam systems. Furthermore, a sternum case in an anthropomorphic phantom was considered and calculated and measured dose distributions were compared at different SSDs.Main results.Instead of the manual commissioning taking up to several days of calculation time and several hours of user time, the auto-commissioning is carried out in a few minutes. Measured and calculated dose distributions agree generally within 3% of maximum dose or 2 mm. The gamma passing rates for the sternum case ranged from 96% to 99% (3% (global)/2 mm criteria, 10% threshold).Significance.The auto-commissioning procedure was successfully implemented and applied to eight TrueBeam systems. The newly developed user-friendly auto-commissioning procedure allows an efficient commissioning of an MC electron beam model and eases the usage of advanced electron radiotherapy utilizing the pMLC for beam shaping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - G Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - H A Loebner
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ma P, Tian Y, Li M, Niu C, Song Y, Dai J. Delivery of intensity-modulated electron therapy by mechanical scanning: An algorithm study. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1063577. [PMID: 36505866 PMCID: PMC9730234 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1063577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose In principle, intensity-modulated electron therapy (IMET) can be delivered through mechanical scanning, with a robotic arm mounting a linac. Materials and methods Here is a scanning algorithm to identify the back-and-forth, top-to-bottom (zigzag) pattern scan sequence. The algorithm includes generating beam positions with a uniform resolution according to the applicator size; adopting discrete energies to achieve the depth of 90% dose by compositing energies; selecting energy by locating the target's distal edge; and employing the energy-by-energy scan strategy for step-and-shoot discrete scanning. After a zigzag scan sequence is obtained, the delivery order of the scan spots is optimized by fast simulated annealing (FSA) to minimize the path length. For algorithm evaluation, scan sequences were generated using the computed tomography data of 10 patients with pancreatic cancer undergoing intraoperative radiotherapy, and the results were compared between the zigzag path and an optimized path. A simple calculation of the treatment delivery time, which comprises the irradiation time, the total robotic arm moving time, the time for energy switch, and the time to stop and restart the beam, was also made. Results In these clinical cases, FSA optimization shortened the path lengths by 12%-43%. Assuming the prescribed dose was 15 Gy, machine dose rate was 15 Gy/s, energy switch time was 2 s, stop and restart beam time was 20 ms, and robotic arm move speed was 50 mm/s, the average delivery time was 124±38 s. The largest reduction in path length yielded an approximately 10% reduction in the delivery time, which can be further reduced by increasing the machine dose rate and the robotic arm speed, decreasing the time for energy switch, and/or developing more efficient algorithms. Conclusion Mechanically scanning IMET is potentially feasible and worthy of further exploration.
Collapse
|
6
|
Heath E, Mueller S, Guyer G, Duetschler A, Elicin O, Aebersold D, Fix MK, Manser P. Implementation and experimental validation of a robust hybrid direct aperture optimization approach for mixed-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:7299-7312. [PMID: 34585756 PMCID: PMC9292851 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2021] [Revised: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose The objectives of the work presented in this paper were to (1) implement a robust‐optimization method for deliverable mixed‐beam radiotherapy (MBRT) plans within a previously developed MBRT planning framework; (2) perform an experimental validation of the delivery of robust‐optimized MBRT plans; and (3) compare PTV‐based and robust‐optimized MBRT plans in terms of target dose robustness and organs at risk (OAR) sparing for clinical head and neck and brain patient cases. Methods A robust‐optimization method, which accounts for translational setup errors, was implemented within a previously developed treatment planning framework for MBRT. The framework uses a hybrid direct aperture optimization method combining column generation and simulated annealing. A robust plan was developed and then delivered to an anthropomorphic head phantom using the Developer Mode of a TrueBeam linac. Planar dose distributions were measured and compared to the planned dose. Robust‐optimized and PTV‐based plans were developed for three clinical patient cases consisting of two head and neck cases and one brain case. The plans were compared in terms of the robustness to 5 mm shifts of the target volume dose as well as in terms of OAR sparing. Results Using a gamma criterion of 3%/2 mm and a dose threshold of 10%, the agreement between film measurements and dose calculations was better than 97.7% for the total plan and better than 95.5% for the electron component of the plan. For the two head and neck patient cases, the average clinical target volume (CTV) dose homogeneity index (V95%–V107%) over all the considered setup error scenarios was on average 19% lower for the PTV‐based plans and it had a larger standard deviation. The robust‐optimized plans achieved, on average, a 20% reduction in the OAR doses compared to the PTV‐based plans. For the brain patient case, the CTV dose homogeneity index was similar for the two plans, while the OAR doses were 22% lower, on average, for the robust‐optimized plan. No clear trend in terms of electron contributions was found across the three patient cases, although robust‐optimized plans tended toward higher electron beam energies. Conclusions A framework for robust optimization of deliverable MBRT plans has been developed and validated. PTV‐based MBRT were found to not be robust to setup errors, while the dose delivered by the robust‐optimized plans were clinically acceptable for all considered error scenarios and had better OAR sparing. This study shows that the robust optimization is a promising alternative to conventional PTV margins for MBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Heath
- Carleton Laboratory for Radiotherapy Physics, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Silvan Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gian Guyer
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alisha Duetschler
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Olgun Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Peter Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heng VJ, Serban M, Seuntjens J, Renaud MA. Ion chamber and film-based quality assurance of mixed electron-photon radiation therapy. Med Phys 2021; 48:5382-5395. [PMID: 34224144 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In previous work, we demonstrated that mixed electron-photon radiation therapy (MBRT) produces treatment plans with improved normal tissue sparing and similar target coverage, when compared to photon-only plans. The purpose of this work was to validate the MBRT delivery process on a Varian TrueBeam accelerator and laying the groundwork for a patient-specific quality assurance (QA) protocol based on ion chamber point measurements and 2D film measurements. METHODS MC beam models used to calculate the MBRT dose distributions of each modality (photons/electrons) were validated with a single-angle beam MBRT treatment plan delivered on a slab of Solid Water phantom with a film positioned at a depth of 2 cm. The measured film absorbed dose was compared to the calculated dose. To validate clinical deliveries, a polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) cylinder was machined and holes were made to fit an ionization chamber. A complex MBRT plan involving a photon arc and three electron delivery angles was created with the aim of reproducing a clinically realistic dose distribution in typical soft tissue sarcoma tumours of the extremities. The treatment plan was delivered on the PMMA cylinder. Point measurements were taken with an Exradin A1SL chamber at two nominal depths: 1.4 cm and 2.1 cm. The plan was also delivered on a second identical phantom with an insert at 2 cm depth, where a film was placed. An existing EGSnrc user-code, SPRRZnrc, was modified to calculate the stopping power ratios between any materials in the same voxelized geometry used for dose calculation purposes. This modified code, called SPRXYZnrc, was used to calculate a correction factor, k MBRT , accounting for the differences in electron fluence spectrum at the measurement point compared to that at reference conditions. The uncertainty associated with neglecting potential ionization chamber fluence perturbation correction factors using this approach was estimated. RESULTS The film measurement from the Solid Water phantom treatment plan was in good agreement with the simulated dose distribution, with a gamma pass rate of 96.1% for a 3%/2 mm criteria. For the PMMA phantom delivery, for the same gamma criteria, the pass rate was 97.3%. The ion chamber measurements of the total delivered dose agreed with the MC-simulated dose within 2.1%. The beam quality correction factors amounted to, at most, a 4% correction on the ion chamber measurement. However, individual contribution of low electron energies proved difficult to precisely measure due to their steep dose gradients, with disagreements of up to 28% ± 15% at 2.1 cm depth (6 MeV). Ion chamber measurement procedure of electron beams was achieved in less than 5 min, and the entire validation process including phantom setup was performed in less than 30 min. CONCLUSION The agreement between measured and simulated MBRT doses indicates that the dose distributions obtained from the MBRT treatment planning algorithm are realistically achievable. The SPRXYZnrc MC code allowed for convenient calculations of k MBRT simultaneously with the dose distributions, laying the groundwork for patient-specific QA protocol practical for clinical use. Further investigation is needed to establish the accuracy of our ionization chamber correction factors k MBRT calculations at low electron energies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veng Jean Heng
- Department of Physics and Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Monica Serban
- Department of Medical Physics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jan Seuntjens
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University and Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marc-André Renaud
- Department of Mathematics and Industrial Engineering, Polytechnique Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ma C, Parsons D, Chen M, Jiang S, Hou Q, Gu X, Lu W. Electron modulated arc therapy (EMAT) using photon MLC for postmastectomy chest wall treatment I: Monte Carlo-based dosimetric characterizations. Phys Med 2019; 67:1-8. [PMID: 31606657 PMCID: PMC6925626 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.10.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2019] [Revised: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the dosimetric properties of electron arc beams delivered by photon-beam multi-leaf collimators (pMLC) in electron modulated arc therapy (EMAT) for postmastectomy chest wall treatments. METHODS Using the Monte Carlo method, we simulated a 2100EX Varian linear accelerator and verified the beam models in a water tank. Dosimetric characterizations were performed on cylindrical water phantoms of elliptical bases with various field sizes, arc ranges and source-to-surface distances (SSDs) for 6, 9 and 12 MeV beam energy. RESULTS The arc beam has a higher bremsstrahlung dose than the static beam at the isocenter due to crossfire, but choosing a field size greater than 5 cm effectively reduces the bremsstrahlung dose. The depths of the 90% maximum dose located at 1.7, 2.8 and 4.1 cm for 6, 9 and 12 MeV, respectively, are similar to those of the static beams and independent of the field size and arc range. CONCLUSION Based on the study, we recommend using the 5 cm field width for electron arc beams considering both bremsstrahlung dose at the isocenter and the arc profile penumbra. To ensure sufficient PTV edge coverage, we recommend a field length extension of at least 4 cm from PTV's edge for all beam energies and an arc extension of around 7°, 5°, and 5° for beam energies 6, 9, and 12 MeV, respectively. These dosimetric characterizations are the basis of pMLC-delivered EMAT treatment planning for postmastectomy chest wall patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoqiong Ma
- Key Lab for Radiation Physics and Technology of Education Ministry of China, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - David Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Mingli Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Steve Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Qing Hou
- Key Lab for Radiation Physics and Technology of Education Ministry of China, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610064, China
| | - Xuejun Gu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75235, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Mueller S, Manser P, Volken W, Frei D, Kueng R, Herrmann E, Elicin O, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK. Part 2: Dynamic mixed beam radiotherapy (DYMBER): Photon dynamic trajectories combined with modulated electron beams. Med Phys 2018; 45:4213-4226. [PMID: 29992574 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to develop a treatment technique for dynamic mixed beam radiotherapy (DYMBER) utilizing increased degrees of freedom (DoF) of a conventional treatment unit including different particle types (photons and electrons), intensity and energy modulation and dynamic gantry, table, and collimator rotations. METHODS A treatment planning process has been developed to create DYMBER plans combining photon dynamic trajectories (DTs) and step and shoot electron apertures collimated with the photon multileaf collimator (pMLC). A gantry-table path is determined for the photon DTs with minimized overlap of the organs at risk (OARs) with the target. In addition, an associated dynamic collimator rotation is established with minimized area between the pMLC leaves and the target contour. pMLC sequences of photon DTs and electron pMLC apertures are then simultaneously optimized using direct aperture optimization (DAO). Subsequently, the final dose distribution of the electron pMLC apertures is calculated using the Swiss Monte Carlo Plan (SMCP). The pMLC sequences of the photon DTs are then re-optimized with a finer control point resolution and with the final electron dose distribution taken into account. Afterwards, the final photon dose distribution is calculated also using the SMCP and summed together with the one of the electrons. This process is applied for a brain and two head and neck cases. The resulting DYMBER dose distributions are compared to those of dynamic trajectory radiotherapy (DTRT) plans consisting only of photon DTs and clinically applied VMAT plans. Furthermore, the deliverability of the DYMBER plans is verified in terms of dosimetric accuracy, delivery time and collision avoidance. For this purpose, The DYMBER plans are delivered to Gafchromic EBT3 films placed in an anthropomorphic head phantom on a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. RESULTS For each case, the dose homogeneity in the target is similar or better for DYMBER compared to DTRT and VMAT. Averaged over all three cases, the mean dose to the parallel OARs is 16% and 28% lower, D2% to the serial OARs is 17% and 37% lower and V10% to normal tissue is 12% and 4% lower for the DYMBER plans compared to the DTRT and VMAT plans, respectively. The DYMBER plans are delivered without collision and with a 4-5 min longer delivery time than the VMAT plans. The absolute dose measurements are compared to calculation by gamma analysis using 2% (global)/2 mm criteria with passing rates of at least 99%. CONCLUSIONS A treatment technique for DYMBER has been successfully developed and verified for its deliverability. The dosimetric superiority of DYMBER over DTRT and VMAT indicates utilizing increased DoF to be the key to improve brain and head and neck radiation treatments in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Mueller
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - P Manser
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - W Volken
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D Frei
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - R Kueng
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - E Herrmann
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - O Elicin
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - D M Aebersold
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - M F M Stampanoni
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zürich and PSI, CH-5232, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - M K Fix
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, CH-3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Joosten A, Müller S, Henzen D, Volken W, Frei D, Aebersold DM, Manser P, Fix MK. A dosimetric evaluation of different levels of energy and intensity modulation for inversely planned multi-field MERT. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2018. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aabe40] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
11
|
Mueller S, Fix MK, Joosten A, Henzen D, Frei D, Volken W, Kueng R, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Manser P. Simultaneous optimization of photons and electrons for mixed beam radiotherapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 62:5840-5860. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa70c5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
|
12
|
Eldib A, Jin L, Martin J, Fan J, Li J, Chibani O, Veltchev I, Price R, Galloway T, Ma CMC. Investigating the dosimetric benefits of modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) for partial scalp patients. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2017. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aa70ab] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
13
|
Sung W, Park JI, Kim JI, Carlson J, Ye SJ, Park JM. Monte Carlo simulation for scanning technique with scattering foil free electron beam: A proof of concept study. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0177380. [PMID: 28493940 PMCID: PMC5426680 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0177380] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 04/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
This study investigated the potential of a newly proposed scattering foil free (SFF) electron beam scanning technique for the treatment of skin cancer on the irregular patient surfaces using Monte Carlo (MC) simulation. After benchmarking of the MC simulations, we removed the scattering foil to generate SFF electron beams. Cylindrical and spherical phantoms with 1 cm boluses were generated and the target volume was defined from the surface to 5 mm depth. The SFF scanning technique with 6 MeV electrons was simulated using those phantoms. For comparison, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans were also generated with two full arcs and 6 MV photon beams. When the scanning resolution resulted in a larger separation between beams than the field size, the plan qualities were worsened. In the cylindrical phantom with a radius of 10 cm, the conformity indices, homogeneity indices and body mean doses of the SFF plans (scanning resolution = 1°) vs. VMAT plans were 1.04 vs. 1.54, 1.10 vs. 1.12 and 5 Gy vs. 14 Gy, respectively. Those of the spherical phantom were 1.04 vs. 1.83, 1.08 vs. 1.09 and 7 Gy vs. 26 Gy, respectively. The proposed SFF plans showed superior dose distributions compared to the VMAT plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wonmo Sung
- Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong In Park
- Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-in Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Joel Carlson
- Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Joon Ye
- Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Min Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Institute for Smart System, Robotics Research Laboratory for Extreme Environments, Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Suwon, Republic of Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Park JI, Ha SW, Kim JI, Lee H, Lee J, Kim IH, Ye SJ. Design and evaluation of electron beam energy degraders for breast boost irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:112. [PMID: 27580698 PMCID: PMC5007734 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0686-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background For breast cancer patients who require electron boost energies between 6 and 9 MeV, an energy degraders (ED) in the 9 MeV beamline was specially designed and manufactured to increase the skin dose of 6 MeV and to reduce the penetration depth of 9 MeV beams. Methods We used Monte Carlo (MC) techniques as a guide in the design of ED for use with linear accelerators. In order to satisfy percent depth dose (PDD) characteristics and dose profile uniformity in water, the shape and thickness of Lucite® ED in the 9 MeV beamline was iteratively optimized and then manufactured. The ED geometry consists of a truncated cone attached on top of a plane plate, with total central thickness of 1.0 cm. The ED was placed on the lower most scraper of the electron applicator. The PDDs, profiles, and output factors were measured in water to validate the MC-based design. Results Skin doses with the EDs increased by 8–9 %, compared to those of the 9 MeV beam. The outputs with the EDs were 0.882 and 0.972 for 10 × 10 and 15 × 15 cm2 cones, respectively, as compared to that of a conventional 9 MeV beam for a 10 × 10 cm2 cone. The X-ray contamination remained less than 1.5 %. In-vivo measurements were also performed for three breast boost patients and showed close agreement with expected values. Conclusions The optimally designed ED in the 9 MeV beamline provides breast conserving patients with a new energy option of 7 MeV for boost of the shallow tumor bed. It would be an alternative to bolus and thus eliminate inconvenience and concern about the daily variation of bolus setup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jong In Park
- Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, 151-742, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.,Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung Whan Ha
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-In Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, Korea
| | - Hyunseok Lee
- Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, 151-742, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaegi Lee
- Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, 151-742, Korea.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Il Han Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.,Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Joon Ye
- Department of Transdisciplinary Studies, Program in Biomedical Radiation Sciences, Seoul National University Graduate School of Convergence Science and Technology, Seoul, 151-742, Korea. .,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Seoul National University Medical Research Center, Seoul, Korea. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. .,Interdisciplinary Program in Radiation Applied Life Science, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. .,Advanced Institutes of Convergence Technology, Seoul National University, Suwon, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lloyd SAM, Gagne IM, Bazalova-Carter M, Zavgorodni S. Validation of Varian TrueBeam electron phase-spaces for Monte Carlo simulation of MLC-shaped fields. Med Phys 2016; 43:2894-2903. [PMID: 27277038 DOI: 10.1118/1.4949000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This work evaluates Varian's electron phase-space sources for Monte Carlo simulation of the TrueBeam for modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) and combined, modulated photon and electron radiation therapy (MPERT) where fields are shaped by the photon multileaf collimator (MLC) and delivered at 70 cm SSD. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations performed with EGSnrc-based BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc and penelope-based PRIMO are compared against diode measurements for 5 × 5, 10 × 10, and 20 × 20 cm(2) MLC-shaped fields delivered with 6, 12, and 20 MeV electrons at 70 cm SSD (jaws set to 40 × 40 cm(2)). Depth dose curves and profiles are examined. In addition, EGSnrc-based simulations of relative output as a function of MLC-field size and jaw-position are compared against ion chamber measurements for MLC-shaped fields between 3 × 3 and 25 × 25 cm(2) and jaw positions that range from the MLC-field size to 40 × 40 cm(2). RESULTS Percent depth dose curves generated by BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc and PRIMO agree with measurement within 2%, 2 mm except for PRIMO's 12 MeV, 20 × 20 cm(2) field where 90% of dose points agree within 2%, 2 mm. Without the distance to agreement, differences between measurement and simulation are as large as 7.3%. Characterization of simulated dose parameters such as FWHM, penumbra width and depths of 90%, 80%, 50%, and 20% dose agree within 2 mm of measurement for all fields except for the FWHM of the 6 MeV, 20 × 20 cm(2) field which falls within 2 mm distance to agreement. Differences between simulation and measurement exist in the profile shoulders and penumbra tails, in particular for 10 × 10 and 20 × 20 cm(2) fields of 20 MeV electrons, where both sets of simulated data fall short of measurement by as much as 3.5%. BEAMnrc/DOSXYZnrc simulated outputs agree with measurement within 2.3% except for 6 MeV MLC-shaped fields. Discrepancies here are as great as 5.5%. CONCLUSIONS TrueBeam electron phase-spaces available from Varian have been implemented in two distinct Monte Carlo simulation packages to produce dose distributions and outputs that largely reflect measurement. Differences exist in the profile shoulders and penumbra tails for the 20 MeV phase-space off-axis and in the outputs for the 6 MeV phase-space.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha A M Lloyd
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8P 3P6 5C2, Canada
| | - Isabelle M Gagne
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, British Columbia V8R 6V5, Canada and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6 5C2, Canada
| | - Magdalena Bazalova-Carter
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6 5C2, Canada
| | - Sergei Zavgorodni
- Department of Medical Physics, BC Cancer Agency-Vancouver Island Centre, Victoria, British Columbia V8R 6V5, Canada and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia V8W 3P6 5C2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yoganathan SA, Das KJM, Raj DG, Kumar S. Dosimetric verification of gated delivery of electron beams using a 2D ion chamber array. J Med Phys 2015; 40:68-73. [PMID: 26170552 PMCID: PMC4478647 DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.158671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2015] [Revised: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetric characteristics; such as beam output, symmetry and flatness between gated and non-gated electron beams. Dosimetric verification of gated delivery was carried for all electron beams available on Varian CL 2100CD medical linear accelerator. Measurements were conducted for three dose rates (100 MU/min, 300 MU/min and 600 MU/min) and two respiratory motions (breathing period of 4s and 8s). Real-time position management (RPM) system was used for the gated deliveries. Flatness and symmetry values were measured using Imatrixx 2D ion chamber array device and the beam output was measured using plane parallel ion chamber. These detector systems were placed over QUASAR motion platform which was programmed to simulate the respiratory motion of target. The dosimetric characteristics of gated deliveries were compared with non-gated deliveries. The flatness and symmetry of all the evaluated electron energies did not differ by more than 0.7 % with respect to corresponding non-gated deliveries. The beam output variation of gated electron beam was less than 0.6 % for all electron energies except for 16 MeV (1.4 %). Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that Varian CL2100 CD is well suitable for gated delivery of non-dynamic electron beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S A Yoganathan
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - K J Maria Das
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - D Gowtham Raj
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Shaleen Kumar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Henzen D, Manser P, Frei D, Volken W, Neuenschwander H, Born EJ, Joosten A, Lössl K, Aebersold DM, Chatelain C, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK. Beamlet based direct aperture optimization for MERT using a photon MLC. Med Phys 2014; 41:121711. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4901638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
|
18
|
Connell T, Alexander A, Papaconstadopoulos P, Serban M, Devic S, Seuntjens J. Delivery validation of an automated modulated electron radiotherapy plan. Med Phys 2014; 41:061715. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4876297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
19
|
Henzen D, Manser P, Frei D, Volken W, Neuenschwander H, Born EJ, Lössl K, Aebersold DM, Stampanoni MFM, Fix MK. Forward treatment planning for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) employing Monte Carlo methods. Med Phys 2014; 41:031712. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4866227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
20
|
Jin L, Eldib A, Li J, Emam I, Fan J, Wang L, Ma CM. Measurement and Monte Carlo simulation for energy- and intensity-modulated electron radiotherapy delivered by a computer-controlled electron multileaf collimator. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2014; 15:4506. [PMID: 24423848 PMCID: PMC5711222 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v15i1.4506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2013] [Revised: 09/25/2013] [Accepted: 09/15/2013] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The dosimetric advantage of modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) has been explored by many investigators and is considered to be an advanced radiation therapy technique in the utilization of electrons. A computer‐controlled electron multileaf collimator (MLC) prototype, newly designed to be added onto a Varian linac to deliver MERT, was investigated both experimentally and by Monte Carlo simulations. Four different electron energies, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV, were employed for this investigation. To ensure that this device was capable of delivering the electron beams properly, measurements were performed to examine the electron MLC (eMLC) leaf leakage and to determine the appropriate jaw positioning for an eMLC‐shaped field in order to eliminate a secondary radiation peak that could otherwise appear outside of an intended radiation field in the case of inappropriate jaw positioning due to insufficient radiation blockage from the jaws. Phase space data were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and recorded at the plane just above the jaws for each of the energies (6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV). As an input source, phase space data were used in MC dose calculations for various sizes of the eMLC shaped field (10×10 cm2, 3.4×3.4 cm2, and 2×2 cm2) with respect to a water phantom at source‐to‐surface distance (SSD)=94cm, while the jaws, eMLC leaves, and some accessories associated with the eMLC assembly as well were modeled as modifiers in the calculations. The calculated results were then compared with measurements from a water scanning system. The results showed that jaw settings with 5 mm margins beyond the field shaped by the eMLC were appropriate to eliminate the secondary radiation peak while not widening the beam penumbra; the eMLC leaf leakage measurements ranged from 0.3% to 1.8% for different energies based on in‐phantom measurements, which should be quite acceptable for MERT. Comparisons between MC dose calculations and measurements showed agreement within 1%/1mm based on percentage depth doses (PDDs) and off‐axis dose profiles for a range of field sizes for each of the electron energies. Our current work has demonstrated that the eMLC and other relevant components in the linac were correctly modeled and simulated via our in‐house MC codes, and the eMLC is capable of accurately delivering electron beams for various eMLC‐shaped field sizes with appropriate jaw settings. In the next stage, patient‐specific verification with a full MERT plan should be performed. PACS number: 87.55.ne
Collapse
|
21
|
Eldib A, Jin L, Li J, Ma CMC. Feasibility of replacing patient specific cutouts with a computer-controlled electron multileaf collimator. Phys Med Biol 2013; 58:5653-72. [PMID: 23892910 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/16/5653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
A motorized electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) was developed as an add-on device to the Varian linac for delivery of advanced electron beam therapy. It has previously been shown that electron beams collimated by an eMLC have very similar penumbra to those collimated by applicators and cutouts. Thus, manufacturing patient specific cutouts would no longer be necessary, resulting in the reduction of time taken in the cutout fabrication process. Moreover, cutout construction involves handling of toxic materials and exposure to toxic fumes that are usually generated during the process, while the eMLC will be a pollution-free device. However, undulation of the isodose lines is expected due to the finite size of the eMLC. Hence, the provided planned target volume (PTV) shape will not exactly follow the beam's-eye-view of the PTV, but instead will make a stepped approximation to the PTV shape. This may be a problem when the field edge is close to a critical structure. Therefore, in this study the capability of the eMLC to achieve the same clinical outcome as an applicator/cutout combination was investigated based on real patient computed tomographies (CTs). An in-house Monte Carlo based treatment planning system was used for dose calculation using ten patient CTs. For each patient, two plans were generated; one with electron beams collimated using the applicator/cutout combination; and the other plan with beams collimated by the eMLC. Treatment plan quality was compared for each patient based on dose distribution and dose-volume histogram. In order to determine the optimal position of the leaves, the impact of the different leaf positioning strategies was investigated. All plans with both eMLC and cutouts were generated such that 100% of the target volume receives at least 90% of the prescribed dose. Then the percentage difference in dose between both delivery techniques was calculated for all the cases. The difference in the dose received by 10% of the volume of the target was showing a mean percentage difference of 1.57%± 1.65, while the difference in the dose received by 99% of the volume was showing a mean percentage difference of 1.08%± 0.78. The mean percentage volume of Lung receiving a percentage dose equal to or greater than 20% of the prescribed dose was found to be 8.55%± 7.3 and 8.67%± 7 for the eMLC and applicator/cutout combination delivery methods respectively. Results have shown that target coverage and critical structure sparing can be effectively achieved by electron beams collimated with the eMLC. Positioning the eMLC leaves in such a way to avoids shielding any part of the projected treatment volume is most conservative and would be the recommended method to define the actual leaf position for the eMLC defined field. More optimal leaf positions can be achieved in shaping the same treatment field through the interplay of different leaf positioning strategies. We concluded that the eMLC represents an effective time saving and pollution-free device that can completely replace patient specific cutouts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Eldib
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Chatelain C, Vetterli D, Henzen D, Favre P, Morf D, Scheib S, Fix MK, Manser P. Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon EPID for verification of modulated electron radiotherapy. Med Phys 2013; 40:061710. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4805113] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|
23
|
Papaconstadopoulos P, Seuntjens J. A source model for modulated electron radiation therapy using dynamic jaw movements. Med Phys 2013; 40:051707. [PMID: 23635255 DOI: 10.1118/1.4800492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The development of fast and accurate source models (SMs) might be of crucial importance for the future clinical implementation of modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT). In this study, a SM is presented for reconstructing phase-space information of modulated electron beams using a few-leaf electron collimator (FLEC) and the photon jaws. METHODS During a FLEC-based delivery, two collimation devices (jaws and FLEC) modulate the electron beam characteristics dynamically. The SM separates the beam into a primary and a scattered component. The primary component is derived by a fast Monte Carlo (MC) transport calculation in air using the EGSnrc/BEAMnrc code. The scattered beam is modeled analytically. The accelerator was decomposed into its individual leaf components and the scattered beam was characterized at various levels of the accelerator. Scattered particles are assigned an energy and position by sampling pre-calculated probability distributions. The direction is estimated by geometrical arguments. Particles were assumed to emerge from tunable virtual sources on the side of each collimator leaf. A leaf-hit algorithm was developed to dynamically reject particles that are incident on any collimating leaf. Electron transport in air between the two collimation levels was calculated based on a MC-modified version of the Fermi-Eyges scattering theory. Correlations between direction and position were observed and taken into account at the final collimation level. RESULTS To validate the model, reconstructed phase-space data were compared with the full accelerator MC phase-space data. The model accurately reproduced the beam characteristics and preserved important correlations. Depth and profile dose distributions in water were derived for square, rectangular, and off-axis field sizes and for a range of clinical energies. Discrepancies in the dose distributions and dose output were within 3% in all cases. CONCLUSIONS Fast and accurate SMs open the possibility for fast treatment planning in MERT, based on an inverse optimization MC treatment planning scheme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavlos Papaconstadopoulos
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, 1650 Cedar Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3G 1A4, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alexander A, Soisson E, Renaud MA, Seuntjens J. Direct aperture optimization for FLEC-based MERT and its application in mixed beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2012; 39:4820-31. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4736423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
25
|
Rosca F. A hybrid electron and photon IMRT planning technique that lowers normal tissue integral patient dose using standard hardware. Med Phys 2012; 39:2964-71. [PMID: 22755681 DOI: 10.1118/1.4709606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Florin Rosca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Connell T, Alexander A, Evans M, Seuntjens J. An experimental feasibility study on the use of scattering foil free beams for modulated electron radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:3259-72. [PMID: 22572043 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/11/3259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The potential benefit of using scattering foil free beams for delivery of modulated electron radiotherapy is investigated in this work. Removal of the scattering foil from the beamline showed a measured bremsstrahlung tail dose reduction just beyond R(p) by a factor of 12.2, 6.9, 7.4, 7.4 and 8.3 for 6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV beams respectively for 2 × 2 cm(2) fields defined on-axis when compared to the clinical beamline. Monte Carlo simulations were matched to measured data through careful tuning of source parameters and the modification of certain accelerator components beyond the manufacturer's specifications. An accelerator model based on the clinical beamline and one with the scattering foil removed were imported into a Monte Carlo-based treatment planning system (McGill Monte Carlo Treatment Planning). A treatment planning study was conducted on a test phantom consisting of a PTV and two distal organs at risk (OAR) by comparing a plan using the clinical beamline to a plan using a scattering foil free beamline. A DVH comparison revealed that for quasi-identical target coverage, the volume of each OAR receiving a given dose was reduced, thus reducing the dose deposited in healthy tissue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Connell
- Medical Physics Unit, McGill University, Montreal General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Palma BA, Sánchez AU, Salguero FJ, Arráns R, Sánchez CM, Zurita AW, Hermida MIR, Leal A. Combined modulated electron and photon beams planned by a Monte-Carlo-based optimization procedure for accelerated partial breast irradiation. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:1191-202. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/5/1191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
28
|
Alexander A, DeBlois F, Seuntjens J. Toward automatic field selection and planning using Monte Carlo-based direct aperture optimization in modulated electron radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:4563-76. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/16/s10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
29
|
Eldib AAR, ElGohary MI, Fan J, Jin L, Li J, Ma C, Elsherbini NA. Dosimetric characteristics of an electron multileaf collimator for modulated electron radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2010; 11:2913. [PMID: 20592689 PMCID: PMC5719949 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v11i2.2913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2008] [Revised: 11/11/2009] [Accepted: 12/31/2009] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Modulated electron radiation therapy (MERT) has been proven as an effective way to deliver conformal dose distributions to shallow tumors while sparing distal critical structures and surrounding normal tissues. It had been shown that a dedicated electron multileaf collimator (eMLC) is necessary to reach the full potential of MERT. In this study, a manually-driven eMLC for MERT was investigated. Percentage depth dose (PDD) curves and profiles at different depths in a water tank were measured using ionization chamber and were also simulated using the Monte Carlo method. Comparisons have been performed between PDD curves and profiles collimated using the eMLC and conventional electron applicators with similar size of opening. Monte Carlo simulations were performed for all electron energies available (6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 20 MeV) on a Varian 21EX accelerator. Monte Carlo simulation results were compared with measurements which showed good agreement (< 2%/1mm). The simulated dose distributions resulting from multiple static electron fields collimated by the eMLC agreed well with measurements. Further studies were carried out to investigate the properties of abutting electron beams using the eMLC, as it is an essential issue that needs to be addressed for optimizing the MERT outcome. A series of empirical formulas for abutting beams of different energies have been developed for obtaining the optimum gap sizes, which can highly improve the target dose uniformity.
Collapse
|
30
|
Salguero FJ, Arráns R, Palma BA, Leal A. Intensity- and energy-modulated electron radiotherapy by means of an xMLC for head and neck shallow tumors. Phys Med Biol 2010; 55:1413-27. [PMID: 20150682 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/5/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of delivering intensity- and energy-modulated electron radiation treatment (MERT) by a photon multileaf collimator (xMLC) and to evaluate the improvements obtained in shallow head and neck (HN) tumors. Four HN patient cases covering different clinical situations were planned by MERT, which used an in-house treatment planning system that utilized Monte Carlo dose calculation. The cases included one oronasal, two parotid and one middle ear tumors. The resulting dose-volume histograms were compared with those obtained from conventional photon and electron treatment techniques in our clinic, which included IMRT, electron beam and mixed beams, most of them using fixed-thickness bolus. Experimental verification was performed with plane-parallel ionization chambers for absolute dose verification, and a PTW ionization chamber array and radiochromic film for relative dosimetry. A MC-based treatment planning system for target with compromised volumes in depth and laterally has been validated. A quality assurance protocol for individual MERT plans was launched. Relative MC dose distributions showed a high agreement with film measurements and absolute ion chamber dose measurements performed at a reference point agreed with MC calculations within 2% in all cases. Clinically acceptable PTV coverage and organ-at-risk sparing were achieved by using the proposed MERT approach. MERT treatment plans, based on delivery of intensity-modulated electron beam using the xMLC, for superficial head and neck tumors, demonstrated comparable or improved PTV dose homogeneity with significantly lower dose to normal tissues. The clinical implementation of this technique will be able to offer a viable alternative for the treatment of shallow head and neck tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Javier Salguero
- Departamento de Fisiología Médica y Biofísica, Universidad de Sevilla, and Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Salguero FJ, Palma B, Arrans R, Rosello J, Leal A. Modulated electron radiotherapy treatment planning using a photon multileaf collimator for post-mastectomized chest walls. Radiother Oncol 2009; 93:625-32. [PMID: 19758721 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2009.08.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2009] [Revised: 08/13/2009] [Accepted: 08/13/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE To evaluate the feasibility of using a photon MLC (xMLC) for modulated electron radiotherapy treatment (MERT) as an alternative to conventional post-mastectomy chest wall (CW) irradiation. A Monte Carlo (MC) based planning system was developed to overcome the inaccuracy of the 'pencil beam' algorithm. MC techniques are known to accurately calculate the dose distributions of electron beams, allowing the explicit simulation of electron interactions within the MLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS Four real clinical CW cases were planned using MERT which were compared with the conventional electron treatments based on blocks and by a straightforward approach using the MLC, and not the blocks (as an intermediate step to MERT) to shape the same segments with SSD between 60 and 70 cm depending on PTV size. MC calculations were verified with an array of ionization chambers and radiochromic films in a solid water phantom. RESULTS Tests based on gamma analysis between MC dose distributions and radiochromic film measurements showed an excellent agreement. Differences in the absolute dose measured with a plane-parallel chamber at a reference point were below 3% for all cases. MERT solution showed a better PTV coverage and a significant reduction of the doses to the organs at risk (OARs). CONCLUSION MERT can effectively improve the current electron treatments by obtaining a better PTV coverage and sparing healthy tissues. More directly, block-shaped treatments could be replaced by MLC-shaped non-modulated segments providing similar results.
Collapse
|
32
|
Engel K, Gauer T. A dose optimization method for electron radiotherapy using randomized aperture beams. Phys Med Biol 2009; 54:5253-70. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/17/012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
33
|
Monte Carlo simulations of electron beams collimated with a dual electron multileaf collimator: a feasibility study. Radiol Phys Technol 2009; 2:210-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s12194-009-0068-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2008] [Revised: 06/16/2009] [Accepted: 06/16/2009] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
34
|
Vatanen T, Traneus E, Lahtinen T. Comparison of conventional inserts and an add-on electron MLC for chest wall irradiation of left-sided breast cancer. Acta Oncol 2009; 48:446-51. [PMID: 18932098 DOI: 10.1080/02841860802477907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Collimation of irregularly shaped clinical electron beams is currently based on electron inserts made of low melting point alloys. The present investigation compares a conventional electron applicator with insert and add-on eMLC-based dose distributions in the postoperative chest wall irradiation of left-sided breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Voxel Monte Carlo++ (VMC++) calculated dose distributions related to electron fields were compared with 10 left-sided breast cancer patients after radical mastectomy. The prescription dose was 50 Gy at a build-up maximum. The same dose was prescribed for the ipsilateral axillary, parasternal and supraclavicular lymph nodes that were treated with photons and calculated with a pencil beam algorithm. The insert beams were shaped with 1.5 cm thick Wood's metal electron inserts in an electron applicator of a Varian 2100 C/D linac. Doses for the eMLC-shaped beams were calculated for an eMLC prototype with 2 cm thick and 5 mm wide steel leaves. The same collimator-to-surface distance (CSD) of 5.8 cm was used for both collimators. RESULTS The mean PTV dose was slightly higher for the eMLC plans (50.7 vs 49.5 Gy, p<0.001, respectively). The maximum doses assessed by D5% for the eMLC and insert were 60.9 and 59.1 Gy (p<0.001). The difference was due to the slightly higher doses near the field edges for the eMLC. The left lung V20 volumes were 34.5% and 34.0% (p<0.001). There was only a marginal difference in heart doses. DISCUSSION Despite a slight increase of maximum dose in PTV the add-on electron MLC for chest wall irradiation results in practically no differences in dose distributions compared with the present insert-based collimation.
Collapse
|
35
|
Klein EE, Mamalui-Hunter M, Low DA. Delivery of modulated electron beams with conventional photon multi-leaf collimators. Phys Med Biol 2008; 54:327-39. [PMID: 19098355 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/2/010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Electron beam radiotherapy is an accepted method to treat shallow tumors. However, modulation of electrons to customize dose distributions has not readily been achieved. Studies of bolus and tertiary collimation systems have been met with limitations. We pursue the use of photon multi-leaf collimators (MLC) for modulated electron radiotherapy (MERT) to achieve customized distributions for potential clinical use. As commercial planning systems do not support the use of MLC with electrons, planning was conducted using Monte Carlo calculations. Segmented and dynamic modulated delivery of multiple electron segments was configured, calculated and delivered for validation. Delivery of electrons with segmented or dynamic leaf motion was conducted. A phantom possessing an idealized stepped target was planned and optimized with subsequent validation by measurements. Finally, clinical treatment plans were conducted for post-mastectomy and cutaneous lymphoma of the scalp using forward optimization techniques. Comparison of calculations and measurements was successful with agreement of +/-2%/2 mm for the energies, segment sizes, depths tested for delivered segments for the dynamic and segmented delivery. Clinical treatment plans performed provided optimal dose coverage of the target while sparing distal organs at risk. Execution of plans using an anthropomorphic phantom to ensure safe and efficient delivery was conducted. Our study validates that MERT is not only possible using the photon MLC, but the efficient and safe delivery inherent with the dynamic delivery provides an ideal technique for shallow tumor treatment.
Collapse
|
36
|
Jin L, Ma CM, Fan J, Eldib A, Price RA, Chen L, Wang L, Chi Z, Xu Q, Sherif M, Li JS. Dosimetric verification of modulated electron radiotherapy delivered using a photon multileaf collimator for intact breasts. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:6009-25. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/21/008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
37
|
Gauer T, Sokoll J, Cremers F, Harmansa R, Luzzara M, Schmidt R. Characterization of an add-on multileaf collimator for electron beam therapy. Phys Med Biol 2008; 53:1071-85. [PMID: 18263959 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/53/4/017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
An add-on multileaf collimator for electrons (eMLC) has been developed that provides computer-controlled beam collimation and isocentric dose delivery. The design parameters result from the design study by Gauer et al (2006 Phys. Med. Biol. 51 5987-6003) and were configured such that a compact and light-weight eMLC with motorized leaves can be industrially manufactured and stably mounted on a conventional linear accelerator. In the present study, the efficiency of an initial computer-controlled prototype was examined according to the design goals and the performance of energy- and intensity-modulated treatment techniques. This study concentrates on the attachment and gantry stability as well as the dosimetric characteristics of central-axis and off-axis dose, field size dependence, collimator scatter, field abutment, radiation leakage and the setting of the accelerator jaws. To provide isocentric irradiation, the eMLC can be placed either 16 or 28 cm above the isocentre through interchangeable holders. The mechanical implementation of this feature results in a maximum field displacement of less than 0.6 mm at 90 degrees and 270 degrees gantry angles. Compared to a 10 x 10 cm applicator at 6-14 MeV, the beam penumbra of the eMLC at a 16 cm collimator-to-isocentre distance is 0.8-0.4 cm greater and the depth-dose curves show a larger build-up effect. Due to the loss in energy dependence of the therapeutic range and the much lower dose output at small beam sizes, a minimum beam size of 3 x 3 cm is necessary to avoid suboptimal dose delivery. Dose output and beam symmetry are not affected by collimator scatter when the central axis is blocked. As a consequence of the broader beam penumbra, uniform dose distributions were measured in the junction region of adjacent beams at perpendicular and oblique beam incidence. However, adjacent beams with a high difference in a beam energy of 6 to 14 MeV generate cold and hot spots of approximately 15% in the abutting region. In order to improve uniformity, the energy of adjacent beams must be limited to 6 to 10 MeV and 10 to 14 MeV respectively. At the maximum available beam energy of 14 MeV, radiation leakage results mainly from the intraleaf leakage of approximately 2.5% relative dose which could be effectively eliminated at off-axis distances remote from the field edge by adjusting the jaw field size to the respective opening of the eMLC. Additionally, the interleaf and leaf-end leakage could be reduced by using a tongue-and-groove leaf shape and adjoining the leaf-ends off-axis respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Gauer
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radio-Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|