Biologically-equivalent dose and long-term survival time in radiation treatments

AAPM Task Group Report 267: A joint AAPM GEC-ESTRO report on biophysical models and tools for the planning and evaluation of brachytherapy

Brachytherapy utilizes a multitude of radioactive sources and treatment techniques that often exhibit widely different spatial and temporal dose delivery patterns. Biophysical models, capable of modeling the key interacting effects of dose delivery patterns with the underlying cellular processes of the irradiated tissues, can be a potentially useful tool for elucidating the radiobiological effects of complex brachytherapy dose delivery patterns and for comparing their relative clinical effectiveness. While the biophysical models have been used largely in research settings by experts, it has also been used increasingly by clinical medical physicists over the last two decades. A good understanding of the potentials and limitations of the biophysical models and their intended use is critically important in the widespread use of these models. To facilitate meaningful and consistent use of biophysical models in brachytherapy, Task Group 267 (TG-267) was formed jointly with the American Association of Physics in Medicine (AAPM) and The Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology (GEC-ESTRO) to review the existing biophysical models, model parameters, and their use in selected brachytherapy modalities and to develop practice guidelines for clinical medical physicists regarding the selection, use, and interpretation of biophysical models. The report provides an overview of the clinical background and the rationale for the development of biophysical models in radiation oncology and, particularly, in brachytherapy; a summary of the results of literature review of the existing biophysical models that have been used in brachytherapy; a focused discussion of the applications of relevant biophysical models for five selected brachytherapy modalities; and the task group recommendations on the use, reporting, and implementation of biophysical models for brachytherapy treatment planning and evaluation. The report concludes with discussions on the challenges and opportunities in using biophysical models for brachytherapy and with an outlook for future developments.

Local ablative stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The oligometastases is considered an intermediate state of the disease between localized and wide spread metastases. Local ablative therapy to oligometastatic prostate cancer is gaining significant traction and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an emerging treatment modality for this patient population. In this review, we report our literature review of SBRT to prostate oligometastases. Current evidence on the role of SBRT in oligometastatic prostate cancer reported in the last 10 years was summarized. Criteria for inclusion included studies with prostate cancer only as the primary site.

RECENT FINDINGS

The unique properties of the oligometastatic prostate cancer appear to carry a better prognosis than wide spread metastatic disease, especially if these metastases are amenable to local ablative therapies. Our literature review revealed that local ablative therapy, using SBRT to prostate oligometastases, is associated with significant 2-years local control and acceptable toxicity profile.

SUMMARY

SBRT to oligometastatic prostate cancer patients is feasible and carries an acceptable toxicity profile. The randomized phase II and III trials, currently underway, should clearly define the real benefit of this approach on progression-free and overall survival outcomes.

Coupling I-125 permanent implant prostate brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations with radiobiological models

PURPOSE

To investigate the coupling of radiobiological models with patient-specific Monte Carlo (MC) dose calculations for permanent implant prostate brachytherapy (PIPB). To compare radiobiological indices evaluated with different radiobiological models using MC and simulated AAPM TG-43 dose calculations.

METHODS

Three-dimensional dose distributions previously computed using MC techniques with two types of patient models, TG43sim (AAPM TG-43 water-based conditions) and MCDmm (realistic tissues and interseed effects), for 613 PIPB patients are coupled with biological dose and tumour control probability (TCP) models. Two approaches and their extensions are considered to evaluate biological doses, biologically effective dose (BED) and isoeffective dose (IED), as well as two methods to evaluate TCP. Three novel extensions of equivalent uniform biologically effective dose (EUBED) are suggested which consider the spatial distribution of doses within the target volume. Adopted radiobiological model parameter values (α, β, etc) are those suggested by AAPM TG-137, and sensitivity to parameter choice is discussed.

RESULTS

MCDmm dose calculations can reveal low doses in the prostate target volume, due to tissue heterogeneities or inter-seed effects; considering these low doses in EUBED calculations can lower TCP estimates by up to 70%, with largest differences in patients with calcifications. There are large variations in biological doses and TCPs evaluated over the 613 patient cohort for each radiobiological model considered, reflecting the spectrum of physical doses calculated for these patients with either MCDmm or TG43sim. Depending on the model details, BED, IED and EUBED are, on average, 6.0-9.8%, 7.4-9.2% and 1.8-15% higher, respectively, with TG43sim than MCDmm. TCP estimates computed using MCDmm dose distributions are much lower than expected based on past treatment outcome studies, suggesting a need to re-assess model parameters when evaluating radiobiological indices coupled with heterogeneous tissue model-based dose calculations.

CONCLUSIONS

Cohort average differences in biological dose and TCP estimates between radiobiological models are generally larger than differences for any one radiobiological model evaluated with TG43sim or MCDmm dose calculations. However, heterogeneous tissue dose calculations, like MCDmm, can identify clinically-relevant low dose volumes, e.g., in patients with calcifications, which would otherwise be missed with TG-43. In addition to affecting physical dose distributions, these low dose volumes can largely impact radiobiological dose and TCP estimates, which further motivates the clinical implementation of model-based dose calculations for PIPB.

Optimal schedules of fractionated radiation therapy by way of the greedy principle: biologically-based adaptive boosting

We revisit a long-standing problem of optimization of fractionated radiotherapy and solve it in considerable generality under the following three assumptions only: (1) repopulation of clonogenic cancer cells between radiation exposures follows linear birth-and-death Markov process; (2) clonogenic cancer cells do not interact with each other; and (3) the dose response function s(D) is decreasing and logarithmically concave. Optimal schedules of fractionated radiation identified in this work can be described by the following 'greedy' principle: give the maximum possible dose as soon as possible. This means that upper bounds on the total dose and the dose per fraction reflecting limitations on the damage to normal tissue, along with a lower bound on the time between successive fractions of radiation, determine the optimal radiation schedules completely. Results of this work lead to a new paradigm of dose delivery which we term optimal biologically-based adaptive boosting (OBBAB). It amounts to (a) subdividing the target into regions that are homogeneous with respect to the maximum total dose and maximum dose per fraction allowed by the anatomy and biological properties of the normal tissue within (or adjacent to) the region in question and (b) treating each region with an individual optimal schedule determined by these constraints. The fact that different regions may be treated to different total dose and dose per fraction mean that the number of fractions may also vary between regions. Numerical evidence suggests that OBBAB produces significantly larger tumor control probability than the corresponding conventional treatments.

On the probability of cure for heavy-ion radiotherapy

The probability of a cure in radiation therapy (RT)-viewed as the probability of eventual extinction of all cancer cells-is unobservable, and the only way to compute it is through modeling the dynamics of cancer cell population during and post-treatment. The conundrum at the heart of biophysical models aimed at such prospective calculations is the absence of information on the initial size of the subpopulation of clonogenic cancer cells (also called stem-like cancer cells), that largely determines the outcome of RT, both in an individual and population settings. Other relevant parameters (e.g. potential doubling time, cell loss factor and survival probability as a function of dose) are, at least in principle, amenable to empirical determination. In this article we demonstrate that, for heavy-ion RT, microdosimetric considerations (justifiably ignored in conventional RT) combined with an expression for the clone extinction probability obtained from a mechanistic model of radiation cell survival lead to useful upper bounds on the size of the pre-treatment population of clonogenic cancer cells as well as upper and lower bounds on the cure probability. The main practical impact of these limiting values is the ability to make predictions about the probability of a cure for a given population of patients treated to newer, still unexplored treatment modalities from the empirically determined probability of a cure for the same or similar population resulting from conventional low linear energy transfer (typically photon/electron) RT. We also propose that the current trend to deliver a lower total dose in a smaller number of fractions with larger-than-conventional doses per fraction has physical limits that must be understood before embarking on a particular treatment schedule.

Inclusion of radiobiological factors in prostate brachytherapy treatment planning

Purpose: Comparison of prostate seed implant treatment plans is currently based on evaluation of dose-volume histograms and doses to the tumour and normal structures. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumour repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the radiobiological response is used to obtain a more inclusive and clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation tool.

Materials and Methods: Ten patients were evaluated. For each patient, six different treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Plans with iodine-125 used a prescription dose of 145 Gy while plans with palladium-103 used 115 Gy. The biologically effective dose was used together with the tumour control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities of urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue to evaluate the effectiveness of each treatment plan. Results from the radiobiological evaluation were compared to standard dose quantifiers.

Results: The use of response probabilities is seen to provide a simpler means of treatment evaluation compared to standard dose quantifiers. This allows for different treatment plans to be quickly compared. Additionally, the use of radiobiologically-based plan evaluation allows for optimisation of seed type and initial seed strengths to find the ideal balance of TCP and NTCP.

Conclusion: The goal of this work was to incorporate the biological response to obtain a more complete and clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation tool. This resulted in a simpler means of plan evaluation that may be used to compare and optimise prostate seed implant treatment plans.

Radiobiological comparison of single and dual-isotope prostate seed implants

Purpose: Several isotopes are available for low dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Currently most implants use a single isotope. However, the use of dual-isotope implants may yield an advantageous combination of characteristics such as half-life and relative biological effectiveness. However, the use of dual-isotope implants complicates treatment planning and quality assurance. Do the benefits of dual-isotope implants outweigh the added difficulty? The goal of this work was to use a linear-quadratic model to compare single and dual-isotope implants.

Materials & Methods: Ten patients were evaluated. For each patient, six treatment plans were created with single or dual-isotope combinations of 125I, 103Pd and 131Cs. For each plan the prostate, urethra, rectum and bladder were contoured by a physician. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and normal tissue complication probabilities for each plan. Each plan was evaluated using favorable, intermediate and unfavorable radiobiological parameters. The results of the radiobiological analysis were used to compare the single and dual-isotope treatment plans.

Results: Iodine-125 only implants were seen to be most affected by changes in tumor parameters. Significant differences in organ response probabilities were seen at common dose levels. However, after adjusting the initial seed strength the differences between isotope combinations were minimal.

Conclusions: The objective of this work was to perform a radiobiologically based comparison of single and dual-isotope prostate seed implant plans. For all isotope combinations, the plans were improved by varying the initial seed strength. For the optimized treatment plans, no substantial differences in predicted treatment outcomes were seen among the different isotope combinations.

Modelling the correlation between EGFr expression and tumour cell radiosensitivity, and combined treatments of radiation and monoclonal antibody EGFr inhibitors

Purpose

To estimate the effects of heterogeneity on tumour cell sensitivity to radiotherapy combined with radiosensitizing agents attributable to differences in expression levels of Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFr).

Materials and methods

Differences in radiosensitivity are not limited to cells of different cancer histotypes but also occur within the same cancer, or appear during radiotherapy if radiosensitizing drugs are combined with ionizing radiation. A modified biologically effective dose (MBED), has been introduced to account for changes in radiosensitivity parameters (α and α/β) rather than changes in dose/fraction or total dose as normally done with standard biologically effective dose (BED). The MBED approach was applied to cases of EGFr over-expression and cases where EGFr inhibitors were combined with radiation. Representative examples in clinical practice were considered.

Results

Assuming membrane EGFr over-expression corresponds to reduced radiosensitivity (α_H = 0.15 Gy^-1 and α_H/β_H = 7.5 Gy) relative to normal radiosensitivity (α = 0.2 Gy^-1 and α/β = 10 Gy), an increased dose per fraction of 2.42 Gy was obtained through the application of MBED, which is equivalent to the effect of a reference schedule with 30 fractions of 2 Gy. An equivalent hypo-fractionated regime with a dose per fraction of 2.80 Gy is obtained if 25 fractions are set. Dose fractionations modulated according to drug pharmacokinetics are estimated for combined treatments with biological drugs. Soft and strong modulated equivalent hypo-fractionations result from subtraction of 5 or 10 fractions, respectively.

Conclusions

During this computational study, a new radiobiological tool has been introduced. The MBED allows the required dose per fraction to be estimated when tumour radiosensitivity is reduced because EGFr is over-expressed. If radiotherapy treatment is combined with EGFr inhibitors, MBED suggests new treatment strategies, with schedules modulated according to drug pharmacokinetics.

Calculating prescription doses for new sources by biologically effective dose matching

PURPOSE

In current clinical practice, single isotopes, such as (125)I or (103)Pd, are used as single sources in prostate seed implants. A mixture of two radionuclides in the seeds has been proposed for prostate cancer treatment. This study investigates a method for determining the prescription dose for these new seeds using the biological effective dose (BED).

METHODS

Ten prostate cancer cases previously treated using single radionuclide seeds were selected for this study. The BED distribution for these cases was calculated. Plans using other radionuclides were then calculated based on this BED distribution. Prescription values could then be obtained for the calculated plans. The method was verified by calculating the prescription dose for (103)Pd and (125)I and comparing to clinical values. The method was then applied to a hybrid seed that consisted of a mixture of (125)I and (103)Pd radionuclides, which deliver equal dose to 1cm from the source in water (50/50D@1 cm). A prescription BED value was also calculated.

RESULTS

A prescription BED of 110 Gy was found to correlate to a prescription dose of 145, 120, and 137 Gy for (125)I, (103)Pd, and 50/50D@1 cm hybrid seeds, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The method introduced in this article allows one to calculate the prescription dose for new and novel sources in brachytherapy. The method was verified by calculating a prescription dose for (125)I and (103)Pd radionuclides that coincides with values used clinically.

Evaluation of the effect of prostate volume change on tumor control probability in LDR brachytherapy

Purpose

This study evaluates low dose-rate brachytherapy (LDR) prostate plans to determine the biological effect of dose degradation due to prostate volume changes.

Material and methods

In this study, 39 patients were evaluated. Pre-implant prostate volume was determined using ultrasound. These images were used with the treatment planning system (Nucletron Spot Pro 3.1^®) to create treatment plans using ¹⁰³Pd seeds. Following the implant, patients were imaged using CT for post-implant dosimetry. From the pre and post-implant DVHs, the biologically equivalent dose and the tumor control probability (TCP) were determined using the biologically effective uniform dose. The model used RBE = 1.75 and α/β = 2 Gy.

Results

The prostate volume changed between pre and post implant image sets ranged from –8% to 110%. TCP and the mean dose were reduced up to 21% and 56%, respectively. TCP is observed to decrease as the mean dose decreases to the prostate. The post-implant tumor dose was generally observed to decrease, compared to the planned dose. A critical uniform dose of 130 Gy was established. Below this dose, TCP begins to fall-off. It was also determined that patients with a small prostates were more likely to suffer TCP decrease.

Conclusions

The biological effect of post operative prostate growth due to operative trauma in LDR was evaluated using the concept. The post-implant dose was lower than the planned dose due to an increase of prostate volume post-implant. A critical uniform dose of 130 Gy was determined, below which TCP begun to decline.

The impact of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control after permanent interstitial brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancers

Previous studies have shown that procedure-induced prostate edema during permanent interstitial brachytherapy (PIB) can cause significant variations in the dose delivered to the prostate gland. Because the clinical impact of edema-induced dose variations strongly depends on the magnitude of the edema, the temporal pattern of its resolution and its interplay with the decay of radioactivity and the underlying biological processes of tumor cells (such as tumor potential doubling time), we investigated the impact of edema-induced dose variations on the tumor cell survival and tumor control probability after PIB with the (131)Cs, (125)I and (103)Pd sources used in current clinical practice. The exponential edema resolution model reported by Waterman et al (1998 Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 41 1069-77) was used to characterize the edema evolutions previously observed during clinical PIB for prostate cancer. The concept of biologically effective dose, taking into account tumor cell proliferation and sublethal damage repair during dose delivery, was used to characterize the effects of prostate edema on cell survival and tumor control probability. Our calculation indicated that prostate edema, if not appropriately taken into account, can increase the cell survival and decrease the probability of local control of PIB. The magnitude of an edema-induced increase in cell survival increased with increasing edema severity, decreasing half-life of radioactive decay and decreasing photon energy emitted by the source. At the doses currently prescribed for PIB and for prostate cancer cells characterized by nominal radiobiology parameters recommended by AAPM TG-137, PIB using (125)I sources was less affected by edema than PIB using (131)Cs or (103)Pd sources due to the long radioactive decay half-life of (125)I. The effect of edema on PIB using (131)Cs or (103)Pd was similar. The effect of edema on (103)Pd PIB was slightly greater, even though the decay half-life of (103)Pd (17 days) is longer than that of (131)Cs (9.7 days), because the advantage of the longer (103)Pd decay half-life was negated by the lower effective energy of the photons it emits (∼21 keV compared to ∼30.4 keV for (131)Cs). In addition, the impact of edema could be reduced or enhanced by differences in the tumor characteristics (e.g. potential tumor doubling time or the α/β ratio), and the effect of these factors varied for the different radioactive sources. There is a clear need to consider the effects of prostate edema during the planning and evaluation of permanent interstitial brachytherapy treatments for prostate cancer.

Radiobiologically based treatment plan evaluation for prostate seed implants

Purpose

Accurate prostate low dose-rate brachytherapy treatment plan evaluation is important for future care decisions. Presently, an evaluation is based on dosimetric quantifiers for the tumor and organs at risk. However, these do not account for effects of varying dose-rate, tumor repopulation and other biological effects. In this work, incorporation of the biological response is used to obtain more clinically relevant treatment plan evaluation.

Material and methods

Eleven patients were evaluated. Each patient received a 145 Gy implant. Iodine-125 seeds were used and the treatment plans were created on the Prowess system. Based on CT images the post-implant plan was created. In the post-plan, the tumor, urethra, bladder and rectum were contoured. The biologically effective dose was used to determine the tumor control probability and the normal tissue complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue.

Results

The average tumor control probability and complication probabilities for the urethra, bladder, rectum and surrounding tissue were 99%, 29%, 0%, 12% and 6%, respectively. These measures provide a simpler means for evaluation and since they include radiobiological factors, they provide more reliable estimation of the treatment outcome. 

Conclusions

The goal of this work was to create more clinically relevant prostate seed-implant evaluation by incorporating radiobiological measures. This resulted in a simpler descriptor of treatment plan quality and was consistent with patient outcomes.

Tumor control probability in radiation treatment

Patients undergoing radiation therapy (and their physicians alike) are concerned with the probability of cure (long-term recurrence-free survival, meaning the absence of a detectable or symptomatic tumor). This is not what current practice categorizes as "tumor control (TC);" instead, TC is taken to mean the extinction of clonogenic tumor cells at the end of treatment, a sufficient but not necessary condition for cure. In this review, we argue that TC thus defined has significant deficiencies. Most importantly, (1) it is an unobservable event and (2) elimination of all malignant clonogenic cells is, in some cases, unnecessary. In effect, within the existing biomedical paradigm, centered on the evolution of clonogenic malignant cells, full information about the long-term treatment outcome is contained in the distribution Pm(T) of the number of malignant cells m that remain clonogenic at the end of treatment and the birth and death rates of surviving tumor cells after treatment. Accordingly, plausible definitions of tumor control are invariably traceable to Pm(T). Many primary cancers, such as breast and prostate cancer, are not lethal per se; they kill through metastases. Therefore, an object of tumor control in such cases should be the prevention of metastatic spread of the disease. Our claim, accordingly, is that improvements in radiation therapy outcomes require a twofold approach: (a) Establish a link between survival time, where the events of interest are local recurrence or distant (metastatic) failure (cancer-free survival) or death (cancer-specific survival), and the distribution Pm(T) and (b) link Pm(T) to treatment planning (modality, total dose, and schedule of radiation) and tumor-specific parameters (initial number of clonogens, birth and spontaneous death rates during the treatment period, and parameters of the dose-response function). The biomedical, mathematical, and practical aspects of implementing this program are discussed.

Three-dimensional radiobiological dosimetry (3D-RD) with 124I PET for 131I therapy of thyroid cancer

Radioiodine therapy of thyroid cancer was the first and remains among the most successful radiopharmaceutical (RPT) treatments of cancer although its clinical use is based on imprecise dosimetry. The positron emitting radioiodine, (124)I, in combination with positron emission tomography (PET)/CT has made it possible to measure the spatial distribution of radioiodine in tumors and normal organs at high resolution and sensitivity. The CT component of PET/CT has made it simpler to match the activity distribution to the corresponding anatomy. These developments have facilitated patient-specific dosimetry (PSD), utilizing software packages such as three-dimensional radiobiological dosimetry (3D-RD), which can account for individual patient differences in pharmacokinetics and anatomy. We highlight specific examples of such calculations and discuss the potential impact of (124)I PET/CT on thyroid cancer therapy.

A treatment planning method for sequentially combining radiopharmaceutical therapy and external radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Effective cancer treatment generally requires combination therapy. The combination of external beam therapy (XRT) with radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) requires accurate three-dimensional dose calculations to avoid toxicity and evaluate efficacy. We have developed and tested a treatment planning method, using the patient-specific three-dimensional dosimetry package 3D-RD, for sequentially combined RPT/XRT therapy designed to limit toxicity to organs at risk.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The biologic effective dose (BED) was used to translate voxelized RPT absorbed dose (D(RPT)) values into a normalized total dose (or equivalent 2-Gy-fraction XRT absorbed dose), NTD(RPT) map. The BED was calculated numerically using an algorithmic approach, which enabled a more accurate calculation of BED and NTD(RPT). A treatment plan from the combined Samarium-153 and external beam was designed that would deliver a tumoricidal dose while delivering no more than 50 Gy of NTD(sum) to the spinal cord of a patient with a paraspinal tumor.

RESULTS

The average voxel NTD(RPT) to tumor from RPT was 22.6 Gy (range, 1-85 Gy); the maximum spinal cord voxel NTD(RPT) from RPT was 6.8 Gy. The combined therapy NTD(sum) to tumor was 71.5 Gy (range, 40-135 Gy) for a maximum voxel spinal cord NTD(sum) equal to the maximum tolerated dose of 50 Gy.

CONCLUSIONS

A method that enables real-time treatment planning of combined RPT-XRT has been developed. By implementing a more generalized conversion between the dose values from the two modalities and an activity-based treatment of partial volume effects, the reliability of combination therapy treatment planning has been expanded.

A radiobiological investigation on dose and dose rate for permanent implant brachytherapy of breast using 125I or 103Pd sources

PURPOSE

The present report addresses the question of what could be the appropriate dose and dose rate for 125I and 103PD permanent seed implants for breast cancer as monotherapy for early stage breast cancer. This is addressed by employing a radiobiological methodology, which is based on the linear quadratic model, to identify a biologically effective dose (BED) to the prescription point of the brachytherapy implant, which would produce equivalent cell killing (or same cell survival) when compared to a specified external radiotherapy scheme.

METHODS

In the present analysis, the tumor and normal tissue BED ratios of brachytherapy and external radiotherapy are examined for different combinations of tumor proliferation constant (K), alpha/beta ratios, initial dose rate (R0), and reference external radiotherapy scheme (50 or 60 Gy in 2 Gy per fraction). The results of the radiobiological analysis are compared against other reports and clinical protocols in order to examine possible opportunities of improvement.

RESULTS

The analysis indicates that physical doses of approximately 100-110 Gy delivered with an initial dose rate of around 0.05 Gyh(-1) and 78-80 Gy delivered at 0.135 Gyh(-1) for 125I and 103Pd permanent implants, respectively, are equivalent to 50 Gy external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in 2 Gy per fraction. Similarly, for physical doses of approximately 115-127 Gy delivered with an initia dose rate of around 0.059 Gyh(-1) and 92 Gy delivered at 0.157 Gyh(-1) for 125I and 103Pd, respectively, are equivalent to 60 Gy EBRT in 2 Gy per fraction. It is shown that the initial dose rate required to produce isoeffective tumor response with 50 or 60 Gy EBRT in 2 Gy per fraction increases as the repopulation factor K increases, even though repopulation is also considered in EBRT. Also, the initial dose rate increases as the value of the alpha/beta ratio decreases. The impact of the different alpha/beta ratios on the ratio of the tumor BEDs is significantly large for both the 125I and 103Pd implants with the deviation between the alpha/beta = 10.0 Gy ratios and those using the 4.0 and 3.5 Gy values ranging between 18% and 22% in most of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

For the cases of 125I and 103Pd, the equivalent physical doses to 50 Gy EBRT in 2 Gy per fraction are associated with an overdosage of the involved normal tissue in the range of 4%-16% and an underdosage by 10%-15% for a BED for normal tissue, using an alpha/beta value of 3.0 Gy (BEDNT,3 Gy) of 100 Gy. These values are lower by 10%-20% than the published value of 124 Gy for 125I and by about 13% when compared to the published isoeffective dose of 90 Gy for 103Pd. Similarly, the equivalent physical doses to 60 Gy EBRT in 2 Gy per fraction are associated with an overdosage of the involved normal tissue by 10%-20% and an underdosage by 4%-10% for BEDNT,3 Gy of 110 Gy.

AAPM recommendations on dose prescription and reporting methods for permanent interstitial brachytherapy for prostate cancer: report of Task Group 137

During the past decade, permanent radioactive source implantation of the prostate has become the standard of care for selected prostate cancer patients, and the techniques for implantation have evolved in many different forms. Although most implants use 125I or 103Pd sources, clinical use of 131Cs sources has also recently been introduced. These sources produce different dose distributions and irradiate the tumors at different dose rates. Ultrasound was used originally to guide the planning and implantation of sources in the tumor. More recently, CT and/or MR are used routinely in many clinics for dose evaluation and planning. Several investigators reported that the tumor volumes and target volumes delineated from ultrasound, CT, and MR can vary substantially because of the inherent differences in these imaging modalities. It has also been reported that these volumes depend critically on the time of imaging after the implant. Many clinics, in particular those using intraoperative implantation, perform imaging only on the day of the implant. Because the effects of edema caused by surgical trauma can vary from one patient to another and resolve at different rates, the timing of imaging for dosimetry evaluation can have a profound effect on the dose reported (to have been delivered), i.e., for the same implant (same dose delivered), CT at different timing can yield different doses reported. Also, many different loading patterns and margins around the tumor volumes have been used, and these may lead to variations in the dose delivered. In this report, the current literature on these issues is reviewed, and the impact of these issues on the radiobiological response is estimated. The radiobiological models for the biological equivalent dose (BED) are reviewed. Starting with the BED model for acute single doses, the models for fractionated doses, continuous low-dose-rate irradiation, and both homogeneous and inhomogeneous dose distributions, as well as tumor cure probability models, are reviewed. Based on these developments in literature, the AAPM recommends guidelines for dose prescription from a physics perspective for routine patient treatment, clinical trials, and for treatment planning software developers. The authors continue to follow the current recommendations on using D90 and V100 as the primary quantitles, with more specific guidelines on the use of the imaging modalities and the timing of the imaging. The AAPM recommends that the postimplant evaluation should be performed at the optimum time for specific radionuclides. In addition, they encourage the use of a radiobiological model with a specific set of parameters to facilitate relative comparisons of treatment plans reported by different institutions using different loading patterns or radionuclides.

Dosimetric guidance on using brachytherapy (low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate) to offset a flawed permanent prostate implant

PURPOSE

To provide practical dosimetric advice on mending suboptimal permanent implants using low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy. The problem is to make the combination of the two radiation treatments (the initial, flawed one and the compensatory boost) clinically isoeffective with the planned dose.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The device of isoeffective dose is the appropriate tool for this purpose as it accounts for the physical (temporal distribution of dose) and biologic (radiosensitivity, repair kinetics, proliferation rate) treatment settings.

RESULTS

I give, as a function of separation time from the initial, flawed treatment, and stratified by risk group representative values for the additional dose (low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate) needed to make the combined treatment isoeffective with a prescription of 144Gy of permanently implanted (125)I seeds.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the isoeffective dose concept, within the constraints stated in the text, is rigorously valid, its practical implementation depends importantly on the relevant radiobiologic parameters, and in this respect the reader is urged to use his own critical judgment.

Three-dimensional imaging-based radiobiological dosimetry

Targeted radionuclide therapy holds promise as a new treatment for cancer. Advances in imaging are making it possible for researchers to evaluate the spatial distribution of radioactivity in tumors and normal organs over time. Matched anatomical imaging, such as combined single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography, has also made it possible to obtain tissue density information in conjunction with the radioactivity distribution. Coupled with sophisticated iterative reconstruction algorithms, these advances have made it possible to perform highly patient-specific dosimetry that also incorporates radiobiological modeling. Such sophisticated dosimetry techniques are still in the research investigation phase. Given the attendant logistical and financial costs, a demonstrated improvement in patient care will be a prerequisite for the adoption of such highly-patient specific internal dosimetry methods.