The influence of a novel transmission detector on 6 MV x-ray beam characteristics

Feasibility study of a scintillation sheet-based detector for fluence monitoring during external photon beam radiotherapy

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the properties of a scintillation sheet-based dosimetry system for beam monitoring with high spatial resolution, including the effects of this system on the treatment beam. The dosimetric characteristics and feasibility of this system for clinical use were also evaluated.

METHODS

The effects of the dosimetry system on the beam were evaluated by measuring the percentage depth doses, dose profiles, and transmission factors. Fifteen treatment plans were created, and the influence of the dosimetry system on these clinical treatment plans was evaluated. The performance of the system was assessed by determining signal linearity, dose rate dependence, and reproducibility. The feasibility of the system for clinical use was evaluated by comparing intensity distributions with reference intensity distributions verified by quality assurance.

RESULTS

The spatial resolution of the dosimetry system was found to be 0.43 mm/pixel when projected to the isocenter plane. The dosimetry system attenuated the intensity of 6 MV beams by about 1.1%, without affecting the percentage depth doses and dose profiles. The response of the dosimetry system was linear, independent of the dose rate used in the clinic, and reproducible. Comparison of intensity distributions of evaluation treatment fields with reference intensity distributions showed that the 1%/1 mm average gamma passing rate was 99.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

The dosimetry system did not significantly alter the beam characteristics, indicating that the system could be implemented by using only a transmission factor. The dosimetry system is clinically suitable for monitoring treatment beam delivery with higher spatial resolution than other transmission detectors.

An investigation of the IQM signal variation and error detection sensitivity for patient specific pre-treatment QA

PURPOSE

To evaluate the Integral Quality Monitor (IQM) as a clinical dosimetry device for detecting photon beam delivery errors in clinically relevant conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The IQM's ability to detect delivery errors introduced into clinical VMAT plans for two different treatment sites was assessed. This included measuring 103 nasopharynx VMAT plans and 78 lung SBRT VMAT plans with introduced errors in gantry angle (1-5°) and in MLC-defined field size and field shift (1-5 mm). The IQM sensitivity was compared to ArcCheck detector performance. Signal dependence on field position for on-axis and asymmetrically offset square field sizes from 1 × 1 cm² to 30 × 30 cm² was also investigated.

RESULTS

The IQM detected almost all introduced clinically-significant MLC field size errors, but not some small gantry angle errors or most MLC field shift errors. The IQM sensitivity was comparable to the ArcCheck for lung SBRT, but worse for the nasopharynx plans. Differences between IQM calculated/predicted and measured signals were within ± 2% for all on-axis square fields, but up to 60% for the smallest asymmetrically offset fields at large offsets.

CONCLUSION

The IQM performance was consistent and reproducible. It showed highest sensitivity to the field size errors for these plans, but did not detect some clinically-significant introduced gantry angle errors or most MLC field shift errors. The IQM calculation model is still being developed, which should improve small offset-field performance. Care is required in IQM use for plan verification or online monitoring, especially for small fields that are off-axis in the detector gradient direction.

Out-of-field scattering from the Integral Quality Monitor® in megavolt photon beams

PURPOSE

To investigate out-of-field scattered doses from the Integral Quality Monitor (IQM) transmission detector in megavoltage photon beams.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We measured out-of-field point doses for 20 × 20 cm² 6-15 MV photon beams using 10 × 2 cm² Gafchromic EBT3 film strips placed across the surfaces of 5-cm thick water-equivalent RW3 slabs. The films were placed at 10 cm intervals from the central axis (CAX) of each beam, up to 1.0 m away on opposite sides of the CAX. The measurements were conducted at 80 cm and 100 cm source-to-surface distances (SSD) without the IQM, and were repeated with the IQM in the paths of the beams. Measurements were also performed at 90 cm SSD for 20 × 20 and 30 × 30 cm² 15 MV fields. Surface dose profiles were then constructed from the measurements for each beam setup with and without the IQM to examine the differences in scattered dose off-axis. The dose profile for each beam setup was normalised to dose maximum measured on the CAX.

RESULTS

Overall, surface dose profiles acquired with the IQM in the paths of the beams were higher than the corresponding profiles without the IQM. The out-of-field dose increased with increase in photon energy, field size, and shorter SSDs, and decreased with off-axis distance. At 80 cm SSD for the 20 × 20 cm² field, the IQM-induced surface dose ranged from -0.6% ÷ 1.9%, -0.3% ÷ 3.0%, and 0.3% ÷ 6.8% for 6, 10, and 15 MV beams, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The higher surface dose profiles measured with the IQM attached to the linac compared to the profiles without the IQM indicates that the device is acting as an additional source of scattered radiation.

Effect of an integral quality monitor on 4-, 6-, 10-MV, and 6-MV flattening filter-free photon beams

Purpose

To investigate the effect of an integral quality monitor (IQM; iRT Systems GmbH, Koblenz, Germany) on 4, 6, 10, and 6‐MV flattening filter‐free (FFF) photon beams.

Methods

We assessed surface dose, PDD_20,10, TPR_20,10, PDD curves, inline and crossline profiles, transmission factor, and output factor with and without the IQM. PDD, transmission factor, and output factor were measured for square fields of 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 cm and profiles were performed for square fields of 3, 5, 10, 20, and 30 cm at 5‐, 10‐, and 30‐cm depth.

Results

The differences in surface dose of all energies for square fields of 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 cm were within 3.7% whereas for a square field of 30 cm, they were 4.6%, 6.8%, 6.7%, and 8.7% for 4‐MV, 6‐MV, 6‐MV‐FFF, and 10‐MV, respectively. Differences in PDD_20,10, TPR_20,10, PDD, profiles, and output factors were within ±1%. Local and global gamma values (2%/2 mm) were below 1 for PDD beyond d_max and inline/crossline profiles in the central beam region, respectively. The gamma passing rates (10% threshold) for PDD curves and profiles were above 95% at 2%/2 mm. The transmission factors for 4‐MV, 6‐MV, 6‐MV‐FFF, and 10‐MV for field sizes from 3 × 3 to 30 × 30 cm² were 0.926–0.933, 0.937–0.941, 0.937–0.939, and 0.949–0.953, respectively.

Conclusions

The influence of the IQM on the beam quality (in particular 4‐MV X‐ray has not verified before) was tested and introduced a slight beam perturbation at the surface and build‐up region and the edge of the crossline/inline profiles. To use IQM in pre‐ and intra‐treatment quality assurance, a tray factor should be put into treatment planning systems for the dose calculation for the 4‐, 6‐, 10‐, and 6‐MV flattening filter‐free photon beams to compensate the beam attenuation of the IQM detector.

Estimating dose delivery accuracy in stereotactic body radiation therapy: A review of in-vivo measurement methods

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been recognized as a standard treatment option for many anatomical sites. Sophisticated radiation therapy techniques have been developed for carrying out these treatments and new quality assurance (QA) programs are therefore required to guarantee high geometrical and dosimetric accuracy. This paper focuses on recent advances on in-vivo measurements methods (IVM) for SBRT treatment. More specifically, all of the online QA methods for estimating the effective dose delivered to patients were compared. Determining the optimal IVM for performing SBRT treatments would reduce the risk of errors that could jeopardize treatment outcome. A total of 89 papers were included. The papers were subdivided into the following topics: point dosimeters (PD), transmission detectors (TD), log file analysis (LFA), electronic portal imaging device dosimetry (EPID), dose accumulation methods (DAM). The detectability capability of the main IVM detectors/devices were evaluated. All of the systems have some limitations: PD has no spatial data, EPID has limited sensitivity towards set-up errors and intra-fraction motion in some anatomical sites, TD is insensitive towards patient related errors, LFA is not an independent measure, DAMs are not always based on measures. In order to minimize errors in SBRT dose delivery, we recommend using synergic combinations of two or more of the systems described in our review: on-line tumor position and patient information should be combined with MLC position and linac output detection accuracy. In this way the effects of SBRT dose delivery errors will be reduced.

External beam patient dose verification based on the integral quality monitor (IQM®) output signals

BACKGROUND

The Integral Quality Monitor (IQM^®) can essentially measure the integral fluence through a segment and provide real-time information about the accuracy of radiation delivery based on comparisons of measured segment signals and pre-calculated reference values. However, the present IQM chamber cannot calculate the dose in the patient.

AIM

This study aims to make use of IQM field output signals to calculate the number of monitor units (MUs) delivered through an arbitrary treatment field in order to convert Monte Carlo (MC)-generated dose distributions in a patient model into absolute dose.

METHODS

XiO and Monaco treatment planning systems (TPSs) were used to define treatment beam portals for cervix and esophagus conformal radiotherapy as well as prostate intensity-modulated radiotherapy for the translation of patient and beam setup information from DICOM to DOSXYZnrc. The planned beams were simulated in a patient model built from actual patient CT images and each simulated integral field/segment was weighted with its MUs before summation to get the total dose in the plan. The segment beam weights (MUs) were calculated as the ratio of the open-field IQM measured signal and the calculated signal per MU extracted from chamber sensitivity maps. These are the actual MUs delivered not just MUs set. The beam weighting method was evaluated by comparing weighted MC doses with original planned doses using profile and isodose comparisons, dose difference maps, γ analysis and dose-volume histogram (DVH) data.

RESULTS

γ pass rates of up to 98% were found, except for the esophagus plan where the γ pass rate was below 45%. DVH comparisons showed good agreement for most organs, with the largest differences observed in low-density lung. However, these discrepancies can result from differences in dose calculation algorithms or differences in MUs used for dose weighting planned by the TPS and MUs calculated using IQM field output signals. To test this, a 4-field box DOSXYZnrc MC simulation weighted with planned (XiO) MUs was compared with the same simulation weighted with IQM-based MUs. Dose differences of up to 5% were found on the isocentre slice. For XiO versus MC, up to 7% dose differences were found, indicating additional error due to limitations of XiO's superposition algorithm. Dose differences between MC Monaco and MC EGSnrc were less than 3%.

CONCLUSIONS

The most valuable comparison was MC versus MC as it eliminated algorithm discrepancies and evaluated dose differences precisely according to beam weighting. For XiO TPS, care must be taken as dose differences may also arise due to limitations in XiO's planning software, not merely due to differences in MUs. Overall, the IQM was successfully used to compute beam dose weights to accurately reconstruct the patient dose using unweighted MC beams. Our technique can be used for pre-treatment QA provided each segment output is known and an accurate linac source model is available.

Impact of a monolithic silicon detector operating in transmission mode on clinical photon beams

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect on surface dose, as a function of different field sizes and distances from the solid water phantom to transmission detector (D_sd), of using the monolithic silicon detector MP512T in transmission mode.

METHODS

The influence of operating the MP512T in transmission mode on the surface dose of a phantom for SSD 100cm was evaluated by using a Markus IC. The MP512T was fixed to an adjustable stand holder and was positioned at different D_sd, ranging from 0.3 to 24 cm. For each D_sd, measurements were carried out for irradiation field sizes of 5 × 5cm², 8 × 8 cm² and 10 × 10 cm². Measurements were obtained under two different operational setups, (i) with the MP512T face-up and (ii) with the MP512T face-down. In addition, the transmission factors for the MP512T and the printed circuit board were only evaluated using a Farmer IC.

RESULTS

For all D_sd and all field sizes, the MP512T led to the surface dose increasing by less than 25% when in the beam. For D_sd >18 cm the surface dose increase is less than 5%, and negligible for field size 5 × 5 cm². The difference in the surface dose perturbation for the MP512T operating face up or operating face down is negligible (<2%) for all field sizes. The transmission factor of the MP512T ranged from 1.020 to 0.9950 for all measured D_sd and field sizes.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that positioning the MP512T in air between the Linac head and the phantom produced negligible perturbation of the surface dose for D_sd >18 cm, and was completely transparent for 6 MV photon beams.

Diode-based transmission detector for IMRT delivery monitoring: a validation study

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the potential of a new transmission detector for real‐time quality assurance of dynamic‐MLC‐based radiotherapy. The accuracy of detecting dose variation and static/dynamic MLC position deviations was measured, as well as the impact of the device on the radiation field (surface dose, transmission). Measured dose variations agreed with the known variations within 0.3%. The measurement of static and dynamic MLC position deviations matched the known deviations with high accuracy (0.7–1.2 mm). The absorption of the device was minimal (∼ 1%). The increased surface dose was small (1%–9%) but, when added to existing collimator scatter effects could become significant at large field sizes (≥30×30 cm2). Overall the accuracy and speed of the device show good potential for real‐time quality assurance.

PACS number(s): 87.55.Qr

Beam perturbation characteristics of a 2D transmission silicon diode array, Magic Plate

The main objective of this study is to demonstrate the performance characteristics of the Magic Plate (MP) system when operated upstream of the patient in transmission mode (MPTM). The MPTM is an essential component of a real‐time QA system designed for operation during radiotherapy treatment. Of particular interest is a quantitative study into the influence of the MP on the radiation beam quality at several field sizes and linear accelerator potential differences. The impact is measured through beam perturbation effects such as changes in the skin dose and/or percentage depth dose (PDD) (both in and out of field). The MP was placed in the block tray of a Varian linac head operated at 6, 10 and 18 MV beam energy. To optimize the MPTM operational setup, two conditions were investigated and each setup was compared to the case where no MP is positioned in place (i.e., open field): (i) MPTM alone and (ii) MPTM with a thin passive contamination electron filter. The in‐field and out‐of‐field surface doses of a solid water phantom were investigated for both setups using a Markus plane parallel (Model N23343) and Attix parallel‐plate, MRI model 449 ionization chambers. In addition, the effect on the 2D dose distribution measured by the Delta⁴ QA system was also investigated. The transmission factor for both of these MPTM setups in the central axis was also investigated using a Farmer ionization chamber (Model 2571A) and an Attix ionization chamber. Measurements were performed for different irradiation field sizes of 5×5 cm2 and 10×10 cm2. The change in the surface dose relative to dmax was measured to be less than 0.5% for the 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV energy beams. Transmission factors measured for both set ups (i & ii above) with 6 MV, 10 MV, and 18 MV at a depth of dmax and a depth of 10 cm were all within 1.6% of open field. The impact of both the bare MPTM and the MPTM with 1 mm buildup on 3D dose distribution in comparison to the open field investigated using the Delta⁴ system and both the MPTM versions passed standard clinical gamma analysis criteria. Two MPTM operational setups were studied and presented in this article. The results indicate that both versions may be suitable for the new real‐time megavoltage photon treatment delivery QA system under development. However, the bare MPTM appears to be slightly better suited of the two MP versions, as it minimally perturbs the radiation field and does not lead to any significant increase in skin dose to the patient.

PACS number(s): 87.50.up, 87.53.Bn, 87.55.N, 87.55.Qr, 87.56.Fc.

A new transmission methodology for quality assurance in radiotherapy based on radiochromic film measurements

Despite individual quality assurance (QA) being recommended for complex techniques in radiotherapy (RT) treatment, the possibility of errors in dose delivery during therapeutic application has been verified. Therefore, it is fundamentally important to conduct in vivo QA during treatment. This work presents an in vivo transmission quality control methodology, using radiochromic film (RCF) coupled to the linear accelerator (linac) accessory holder. This QA methodology compares the dose distribution measured by the film in the linac accessory holder with the dose distribution expected by the treatment planning software. The calculated dose distribution is obtained in the coronal and central plane of a phantom with the same dimensions of the acrylic support used for positioning the film but in a source-to-detector distance (SDD) of 100 cm, as a result of transferring the IMRT plan in question with all the fields positioned with the gantry vertically, that is, perpendicular to the phantom. To validate this procedure, first of all a Monte Carlo simulation using PENELOPE code was done to evaluate the differences between the dose distributions measured by the film in a SDD of 56.8 cm and 100 cm. After that, several simple dose distribution tests were evaluated using the proposed methodology, and finally a study using IMRT treatments was done. In the Monte Carlo simulation, the mean percentage of points approved in the gamma function comparing the dose distribution acquired in the two SDDs were 99.92% ± 0.14%. In the simple dose distribution tests, the mean percentage of points approved in the gamma function were 99.85% ± 0.26% and the mean percentage differences in the normalization point doses were -1.41%. The transmission methodology was approved in 24 of 25 IMRT test irradiations. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the proposed methodology using RCFs can be applied for in vivo QA in RT treatments.

Characterization of a new transmission detector for patient individualized online plan verification and its influence on 6MV X-ray beam characteristics

PURPOSE

Online verification and 3D dose reconstruction on daily patient anatomy have the potential to improve treatment delivery, accuracy and safety. One possible implementation is to recalculate dose based on online fluence measurements with a transmission detector (TD) attached to the linac. This study provides a detailed analysis of the influence of a new TD on treatment beam characteristics.

METHODS

The influence of the new TD on surface dose was evaluated by measurements with an Advanced Markus Chamber (Adv-MC) in the build-up region. Based on Monte Carlo simulations, correction factors were determined to scale down the over-response of the Adv-MC close to the surface. To analyze the effects beyond dmax percentage depth dose (PDD), lateral profiles and transmission measurements were performed. All measurements were carried out for various field sizes and different SSDs. Additionally, 5 IMRT-plans (head & neck, prostate, thorax) and 2 manually created test cases (3×3cm(2) fields with different dose levels, sweeping gap) were measured to investigate the influence of the TD on clinical treatment plans. To investigate the performance of the TD, dose linearity as well as dose rate dependency measurements were performed.

RESULTS

With the TD inside the beam an increase in surface dose was observed depending on SSD and field size (maximum of +11%, SSD = 80cm, field size = 30×30cm(2)). Beyond dmax the influence of the TD on PDDs was below 1%. The measurements showed that the transmission factor depends slightly on the field size (0.893-0.921 for 5×5cm(2) to 30×30cm(2)). However, the evaluation of clinical IMRT-plans measured with and without the TD showed good agreement after using a single transmission factor (γ(2%/2mm) > 97%, δ±3% >95%). Furthermore, the response of TD was found to be linear and dose rate independent (maximum difference <0.5% compared to reference measurements).

CONCLUSIONS

When placed in the path of the beam, the TD introduced a slight, clinically acceptable increase of the skin dose even for larger field sizes and smaller SSDs and the influence of the detector on the dose beyond dmax as well as on clinical IMRT-plans was negligible. Since there was no dose rate dependency and the response was linear, the device is therefore suitable for clinical use. Only its absorption has to be compensated during treatment planning, either by the use of a single transmission factor or by including the TD in the incident beam model.

[Comparison of dose accuracy between 2D array detectors for pre-treatment IMRT QA]

The dosimetric properties between various 2D array detectors were compared and were evaluated with regard to the accuracy in absolute dose and dose distributions for clinical treatment fields. We used to check the dose accuracy: 2D array detectors; MapCHECK (Sun Nuclear), EPID (Varian Medical Systems), EPID-based dosimetry (EPIDose, Sun Nuclear), COMPASS (IBA) and conventional system; EDR2 film (Eastman Kodak), Exradin A-14SL ion chamber (0.016 cc, Standard Imaging). First, we compared the dose linearity, dose rate dependence, and output factor between the 2D array detectors. Next, the accuracy of the absolute dose and dose distributions were evaluated for clinical fields. All detector responses for the dose linear were in agreement within 1%, and the dose rate dependence and output factor agreed within a standard deviation of ±1.2%, except for EPID. This is because EPID is fluence distributions. In all the 2D array detectors, the point dose agreed within 5% with treatment planning system (TPS). Pass rates of each detector for TPS were more than 97% in the gamma analysis (3 mm/3%). EPIDose was in a good agreement with TPS. All 2D array detectors used in this study showed almost the same accuracy for clinical fields. EPIDose has better resolution than other 2D array detectors and thus this is expected for dose distributions with a small field.

Investigation of the spatial resolution of an online dose verification device

PURPOSE

The aim of this work is to characterize a new online dose verification device, COMPASS transmission detector array (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany). The array is composed of 1600 cylindrical ionization chambers of 3.8 mm diameter, separated by 6.5 mm center-to-center spacing, in a 40 × 40 arrangement.

METHODS

The line spread function (LSF) of a single ion chamber in the detector was measured with a narrow slit collimator for a 6 MV photon beam. The 0.25 × 10 mm(2) slit was formed by two machined lead blocks. The LSF was obtained by laterally translating the detector in 0.25 mm steps underneath the slit over a range of 24 mm and taking a measurement at each step. This measurement was validated with Monte Carlo simulation using BEAMnrc and DOSXYZnrc. The presampling modulation transfer function (MTF), the Fourier transform of the line spread function, was determined and compared to calculated (Monte Carlo and analytical) MTFs. Two head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) fields were measured using the device and were used to validate the LSF measurement. These fields were simulated with the BEAMnrc Monte Carlo model, and the Monte Carlo generated incident fluence was convolved with the 2D detector response function (derived from the measured LSF) to obtain calculated dose. The measured and calculated dose distributions were then quantitatively compared using χ-comparison criteria of 3% dose difference and 3 mm distance-to-agreement for in-field points (defined as those above the 10% maximum dose threshold).

RESULTS

The full width at half-maximum (FWHM) of the measured detector response for a single chamber is 4.3 mm, which is comparable to the chamber diameter of 3.8 mm. The pre-sampling MTF was calculated, and the resolution of one chamber was estimated as 0.25 lp∕mm from the first zero crossing. For both examined IMRT fields, the χ-comparison between measured and calculated data show good agreement with 95.1% and 96.3% of in-field points below χ of 1.0 for fields 1 and 2, respectively (with an average χ of 0.29 for IMRT field 1 and 0.24 for IMRT field 2).

CONCLUSIONS

The LSF for a new novel online detector has been measured at 6 MV using a narrow slit technique, and this measurement has been validated by Monte Carlo simulation. The detector response function derived from line spread function has been applied to recover measured IMRT fields. The results have shown that the device measures IMRT fields accurately within acceptable tolerance.

Reconstruction of high-resolution 3D dose from matrix measurements: error detection capability of the COMPASS correction kernel method

The COMPASS system (IBA Dosimetry) is a quality assurance (QA) tool which reconstructs 3D doses inside a phantom or a patient CT. The dose is predicted according to the RT plan with a correction derived from 2D measurements of a matrix detector. This correction method is necessary since a direct reconstruction of the fluence with a high resolution is not possible because of the limited resolution of the matrix used, but it comes with a blurring of the dose which creates inaccuracies in the dose reconstruction. This paper describes the method and verifies its capability to detect errors in the positioning of a MLC with 10 mm leaf width in a phantom geometry. Dose reconstruction was performed for MLC position errors of various sizes at various locations for both rectangular and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) fields and compared to a reference dose. It was found that the accuracy with which an error in MLC position is detected depends on the location of the error relative to the detectors in the matrix. The reconstructed dose in an individual rectangular field for leaf positioning errors up to 5 mm was correct within 5% in 50% of the locations. At the remaining locations, the reconstruction of leaf position errors larger than 3 mm can show inaccuracies, even though these errors were detectable in the dose reconstruction. Errors larger than 9 mm created inaccuracies up to 17% in a small area close to the penumbra. The QA capability of the system was tested through gamma evaluation. Our results indicate that the mean gamma provided by the system is slightly increased and that the number of points above gamma 1 ensures error detection for QA purposes. Overall, the correction kernel method used by the COMPASS system is adequate to perform QA of IMRT treatment plans with a regular MLC, despite local inaccuracies in the dose reconstruction.

A Monte Carlo investigation of contaminant electrons due to a novel in vivo transmission detector

A novel transmission detector (IBA Dosimetry, Germany) developed as an IMRT quality assurance tool, intended for in vivo patient dose measurements, is studied here. The goal of this investigation is to use Monte Carlo techniques to characterize treatment beam parameters in the presence of the detector and to compare to those of a plastic block tray (a frequently used clinical device). Particular attention is paid to the impact of the detector on electron contamination model parameters of two commercial dose calculation algorithms. The linac head together with the COMPASS transmission detector (TRD) was modeled using BEAMnrc code. To understand the effect of the TRD on treatment beams, the contaminant electron fluence, energy spectra, and angular distributions at different SSDs were analyzed for open and non-open (i.e. TRD and block tray) fields. Contaminant electrons in the BEAMnrc simulations were separated according to where they were created. Calculation of surface dose and the evaluation of contributions from contaminant electrons were performed using the DOSXYZnrc user code. The effect of the TRD on contaminant electrons model parameters in Eclipse AAA and Pinnacle(3) dose calculation algorithms was investigated. Comparisons of the fluence of contaminant electrons produced in the non-open fields versus open field show that electrons created in the non-open fields increase at shorter SSD, but most of the electrons at shorter SSD are of low energy with large angular spread. These electrons are out-scattered or absorbed in air and contribute less to surface dose at larger SSD. Calculated surface doses with the block tray are higher than those with the TRD. Contribution of contaminant electrons to dose in the buildup region increases with increasing field size. The additional contribution of electrons to surface dose increases with field size for TRD and block tray. The introduction of the TRD results in a 12% and 15% increase in the Gaussian widths used in the contaminant electron source model of the Eclipse AAA dose algorithm. The off-axis coefficient in the Pinnacle(3) dose calculation algorithm decreases in the presence of TRD compared to without the device. The electron model parameters were modified to reflect the increase in electron contamination with the TRD, a necessary step for accurate beam modeling when using the device.

Enhanced accuracy of the permanent surveillance of IMRT deliveries by iterative deconvolution of DAVID chamber signal profiles

In vivo dosimetry systems, capable of permanently monitoring IMRT treatment deliveries throughout all fractions, are increasingly used in clinical practice. The first of these solutions is the DAVID system, a translucent multiwire ionization chamber placed in the accessory holder of the treatment head below the MLC. Each wire is exactly adjusted along the midline of its associated leaf pair, thereby generating a signal correlated with the aperture of this leaf pair. However, there is some blurring of the profile of the wire signals across the beam due to the lateral transport of scattered secondary electrons in the air gap of the DAVID chamber. This paper deals with a numerical correction by which this effect is eliminated. The true photon fluence profile is calculated from the measured signal profile by an iterative deconvolution algorithm, based upon the convolution kernel formed by the lateral wire signal profile when only one leaf pair is opened. Lateral fluence profiles are thereby obtained with increased resolution, and errors in MLC positioning are revealed with enhanced sensitivity. The needed computational time of less than 1 s has made it feasible to implement the deconvolution algorithm into the daily routine for the accurate surveillance of IMRT deliveries.

Clinical performance of a transmission detector array for the permanent supervision of IMRT deliveries

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Clinical evaluation of a novel dosimetric accessory serving the permanent supervision of MLC function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The DAVID system (PTW-Freiburg, Germany) is a transparent, multi-wire transmission ionization chamber, placed in the accessory holder of the treatment head. Since each of the 37 individual wires is positioned exactly below the associated leaf pair of the MLC, its signal records the opening of this leaf pair during patient treatment.

RESULTS

The DAVID system closes a gap in the quality assurance program, permitting the permanent in-vivo verification of IMRT plans. During dosimetric plan verification with the 2D-ARRAY (PTW-Freiburg, Germany), reference values of the 37 DAVID signals are collected, with which the DAVID readings recorded during daily patient treatment are compared. This comparison is visually displayed in the control room, and warning and alarm levels of any discrepancies can be defined. The properties of the DAVID system as a transmission device, its sensitivity to beam delivery and leaflet errors as well as its stability have been analyzed for clinically relevant examples. In a recent version, the DAVID system has been equipped with 80 wires.

CONCLUSIONS

The DAVID system permits the on-line detection of clinically relevant MLC discrepancies in IMRT deliveries.