1
|
Lebel-Cormier MA, Boilard T, Bernier M, Beaulieu L. Multi-point calorimeter using distributed fiber Bragg gratings for small field dosimetry in radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:3758-3765. [PMID: 38295013 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Revised: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The interest of using fiber Bragg gratings (FBGs) dosimeters in radiotherapy (RT) lies in their (i) microliter detection volume, (ii) customizable spatial resolution, (iii) multi-point dose measurement, (iv) real-time data acquisition and (v) insensitivity to Cherenkov light. These characteristics could prove very useful for characterizing dose distributions of small and nonstandard fields with high spatial resolution. PURPOSE We developed a multi-point FBGs dosimeter customized for small field RT dosimetry with a spatial resolution of ∼ $\sim$ 1 mm. METHODS The 3 cm-long multi-point dosimeter is made by embedding a 80μ m $\umu{\rm {m}}$ silica fiber containing an array of thirty (30) co-located ∼ $\sim$ 1 mm-long fs-written FBGs inside a plastic cylinder with an UV curing optical adhesive. With its higher thermal expansion coefficient, the plastic cylinder increases the sensitivity of the dosimeter by stretching the fiber containing the FBGs when the temperature rises slightly due to radiation energy deposition. Irradiations (2000 MU at 600 MU/min) were performed with a Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. RESULTS The dose profile of a 2 × $ \times$ 2 cm2 $^{2}$ 6 MV beam was measured with a mean relative difference of 1.8% (excluding the penumbra region). The measured output factors for a 6 MV beam are in general agreement with the expected values within the experimental uncertainty (except for the 2 × $\,\times $ 2 cm2 $^{2}$ field). The detector response to different energy of photon and electron beams is within 5% of the mean response (0.068 ± 0.002 $0.068\pm 0.002$ pm/Gy). The calorimeter's post-irradiation thermal decay is in agreement with the theory. CONCLUSIONS An energy-independent small field calorimeter that allows dose profile and output factor measurements for RT using FBGs was developed, which, to our knowledge, has never been done before. This type of detector could prove really useful for small field dosimetry, but also potentially for MRI-LINAC since FBGs are insensitive to magnetic fields and for FLASH since FBGs have been used to measure doses up to 100 kGy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Anne Lebel-Cormier
- Centre Intégré de cancérologie and Axe Oncologie du CRCHU de Québec - Université Laval, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Tommy Boilard
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Centre d'optique, photonique et lasers, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Martin Bernier
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Centre d'optique, photonique et lasers, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Luc Beaulieu
- Centre Intégré de cancérologie and Axe Oncologie du CRCHU de Québec - Université Laval, CHU de Québec - Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche sur le cancer, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
- Département de physique, de génie physique et d'optique, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhou S, Rao W, Chen Q, Tan Y, Smith W, Sun B, Zhou J, Chang CW, Lin L, Darafsheh A, Zhao T, Zhang T. A multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) device for proton pencil beam scan quality assurance. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac8593. [PMID: 35905730 PMCID: PMC11000494 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective. Proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) treatment fields needs to be verified before treatment deliveries to ensure patient safety. In current practice, treatment beam quality assurance (QA) is measured at a few selected depths using film or a 2D detector array, which is insensitive and time-consuming. A QA device that can measure all key dosimetric characteristics of treatment beams spot-by-spot within a single beam delivery is highly desired.Approach. We developed a multi-layer strip ionization chamber (MLSIC) prototype device that comprises of two layers of strip ionization chambers (IC) plates for spot position measurement and 64 layers of plate IC for beam energy measurement. The 768-channel strip ion chamber signals are integrated and sampled at a speed of 3.125 kHz. It has a 25.6 cm × 25.6 cm maximum measurement field size and 2 mm spatial resolution for spot position measurement. The depth resolution and maximum depth were 2.91 mm and 18.6 cm for 1.6 mm thick IC plate, respectively. The relative weight of each spot was determined from total charge by all IC detector channels.Main results. The MLSIC is able to measure ionization currents spot-by-spot. The depth dose measurement has a good agreement with the ground truth measured using a water tank and commercial one-dimensional (1D) multi-layer plate chamber. It can verify the spot position, energy, and relative weight of clinical PBS beams and compared with the treatment plans.Significance. The MLSIC is a highly efficient QA device that can measure the key dosimetric characteristics of proton treatment beams spot-by-spot with a single beam delivery. It may improve the quality and efficiency of clinical proton treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Wei Rao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Qinghao Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Yuewen Tan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Winter Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Baozhou Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Jun Zhou
- Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, GA 30308, United States of America
| | - Chih-Wei Chang
- Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, GA 30308, United States of America
| | - Liyong Lin
- Emory Proton Therapy Center, Atlanta, GA 30308, United States of America
| | - Arash Darafsheh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Tianyu Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| | - Tiezhi Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Physics Division, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63108, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Debrot E, Mundy D, Guatelli S, Petasecca M, Perevertaylo V, Beltran C, Rosenfeld AB. The dose magnifying glass quality assurance system for daily proton therapy range verification. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33761472 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf1b9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 03/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Proton therapy has a distinct dosimetric advantage over conventional photon therapy due to its Bragg peak profile. This allows greater accuracy in dose delivery and dose conformation to the target, however it requires greater precision in setup, delivery and for quality assurance (QA) procedures. The AAPM TG 224 report recommends daily range and spot position checks with tolerance on the order of a millimetre. Daily QA systems must therefore be efficient for daily use and be capable of sub-millimetre precision however few suitable commercial systems are available. In this work, a compact, real-time daily QA system is optimised and characterised for proton range verification using an ad-hoc Geant4 simulation. The system is comprised of a monolithic silicon diode array detector embedded in a perspex phantom. The detector is orientated at an angular offset to the incident proton beam to allow range in perspex to be determined for flat proton fields. The accuracy of the system for proton range in perspex measurements was experimentally evaluated over the full range of clinical proton energies. The meanR100,R90andR80ranges measured with the system were accurate within ±0.6 mm of simulated ranges in a perspex phantom for all energies assessed. This system allows real-time read-out of individual detector channels also making it appropriate for temporal beam delivery diagnostics and for spot position monitoring along one axis. The system presented provides a suitable, economical and efficient alternative for daily QA in proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Debrot
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,ACRF Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - D Mundy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - S Guatelli
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | - M Petasecca
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| | | | - C Beltran
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - A B Rosenfeld
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vai A, Mirandola A, Magro G, Maestri D, Mastella E, Mairani A, Molinelli S, Russo S, Togno M, Civita SL, Ciocca M. Characterization of a MLIC Detector for QA in Scanned Proton and Carbon Ion Beams. Int J Part Ther 2020; 6:50-59. [PMID: 31998821 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-19-00064.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2019] [Accepted: 10/10/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Beam energy validation is a fundamental aspect of the routine quality assurance (QA) protocol of a particle therapy facility. A multilayer ionization chamber (MLIC) detector provides the optimal tradeoff between achieving accuracy in particle range determination and saving operational time in measurements and analysis procedures. We propose the characterization of a commercial MLIC as a suitable QA tool for a clinical environment with proton and carbon-ion scanning beams. Materials and Methods Commercial MLIC Giraffe (IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany) was primarily evaluated in terms of short-term and long-term stability, linearity with dose, and dose-rate independence. Accuracy was tested by analyzing range of integrated depth-dose curves for a set of representative energies against reference acquisitions in water for proton and carbon ion beams; in addition, 2 modulated proton spread-out Bragg peaks were also measured. Possible methods to increase the native spatial resolution of the detector were also investigated. Results Measurements showed a high repeatability: mean relative standard deviation was within 0.5% for all channels and both particle types. The long-term stability of the gain calibration showed discrepancies less than 1% at different times. The detector response was linear with dose (R 2 > 0.99) and independent on the dose rate. Measurements of integrated depth-dose curve ranges revealed a mean deviation from reference measurements in water of 0.1 ± 0.3 mm for protons with a maximum difference of 0.4 mm and 0.2 ± 0.6 mm with maximum difference of 0.85 mm for carbon ion beams. For the 2 modulated proton spread-out Bragg peaks, measured differences in distal dose falloff were ≤0.5 mm against calculated values. Conclusions The detector is stable, linearly responding with dose, precise, and easy to handle for QA beam energy checks of proton and carbon ion beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Vai
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Davide Maestri
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| | - Michele Togno
- R&D Department, IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany
| | | | - Mario Ciocca
- Fondazione CNAO (Italian National Center for Oncological Hadronterapy), Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kato T, Arai K, Sagara T, Kato R, Yamazaki Y, Oyama S. Patient-specific quality assurance for proton depth dose distribution using a multi-layer ionization chamber in a single-ring wobbling method. Radiol Phys Technol 2019; 12:305-311. [PMID: 31273670 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-019-00524-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2019] [Revised: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
The use of a multi-layer ionization chamber, Zebra, in patient-specific quality assurance (QA) for proton depth dose distributions in a single-ring wobbling method is investigated. The depth dose distributions measured using Zebra are compared with those calculated using the treatment planning system (TPS), XiO-M, and measured using an ionization chamber with a motorized water phantom system. Because the TPS only provides point doses, the average doses are calculated using in-house software. The detector size-corrected depth dose distributions are obtained by determining the average of the dose distributions from the TPS over a cylindrical region similar to the size of the Zebra detectors. The calculated depth dose distributions from the cases with a simple compensator shape are in good agreement with those obtained from the TPS without performing volume averaging; however, a 15% difference was shown when compared with those from the cases with a complex compensator shape. Then, the measurements are compared with the detector size-corrected depth dose distributions, showing an improved agreement within 3% for the highly steep dose gradient regions. Although there are some field size limitations, the Zebra system is a useful device for the fast measurement of patient-specific QA for depth dose distributions in wobbled proton beams. However, careful consideration is required for complex dose distribution fields, because the measurements obtained using Zebra cannot be directly compared to the depth dose distributions from the TPS owing to the finite detector size of the Zebra chamber.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Kato
- Preparing Section for New Faculty of Medical Science, Fukushima Medical University, 1 Hikariga-oka, Fukushima City, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan. .,Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan.
| | - Kazuhiro Arai
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Tatsuhiko Sagara
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Ryohei Kato
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Yuhei Yamazaki
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| | - Sho Oyama
- Department of Radiation Physics and Technology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, Koriyama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giordanengo S, Palmans H. Dose detectors, sensors, and their applications. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1051-e1072. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/21/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Simona Giordanengo
- Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Section of Torino Via Giuria 1 10125 Torino Italy
| | - Hugo Palmans
- National Physical Laboratory Medical Radiation Science Hampton Road Teddington Middlesex TW11 0LW UK
- EBG MedAustron GmbH Marie‐Curiestraße 5 A‐2700 Wiener Neustadt Austria
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mirandola A, Magro G, Lavagno M, Mairani A, Molinelli S, Russo S, Mastella E, Vai A, Maestri D, La Rosa V, Ciocca M. Characterization of a multilayer ionization chamber prototype for fast verification of relative depth ionization curves and spread-out-Bragg-peaks in light ion beam therapy. Med Phys 2018. [PMID: 29537642 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To dosimetrically characterize a multilayer ionization chamber (MLIC) prototype for quality assurance (QA) of pristine integral ionization curves (ICs) and spread-out-Bragg-peaks (SOBPs) for scanning light ion beams. METHODS QUBE (De.Tec.Tor., Torino, Italy) is a modular detector designed for QA in particle therapy (PT). Its main module is a MLIC detector, able to evaluate particle beam relative depth ionization distributions at different beam energies and modulations. The charge collecting electrodes are made of aluminum, for a nominal water equivalent thickness (WET) of ~75 mm. The detector prototype was calibrated by acquiring the signals in the initial plateau region of a pristine BP and in terms of WET. Successively, it was characterized in terms of repeatability response, linearity, short-term stability and dose rate dependence. Beam-induced measurements of activation in terms of ambient dose equivalent rate were also performed. To increase the detector coarse native spatial resolution (~2.3 mm), several consecutive acquisitions with a set of certified 0.175-mm-thick PMMA sheets (Goodfellow, Cambridge Limited, UK), placed in front of the QUBE mylar entrance window, were performed. The ICs/SOBPs were achieved as the result of the sum of the set of measurements, made up of a one-by-one PMMA layer acquisition. The newly obtained detector spatial resolution allowed the experimental measurements to be properly comparable against the reference curves acquired in water with the PTW Peakfinder. Furthermore, QUBE detector was modeled in the FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) code following the technical design details and ICs/SOBPs were calculated. RESULTS Measurements showed a high repeatability: mean relative standard deviation within ±0.5% for all channels and both particle types. Moreover, the detector response was linear with dose (R2 > 0.998) and independent on the dose rate. The mean deviation over the channel-by-channel readout respect to the reference beam flux (100%) was equal to 0.7% (1.9%) for the 50% (20%) beam flux level. The short-term stability of the gain calibration was very satisfying for both particle types: the channel mean relative standard deviation was within ±1% for all the acquisitions performed at different times. The ICs obtained with the MLIC QUBE at improved resolution satisfactorily matched both the MC simulations and the reference curves acquired with Peakfinder. Deviations from the reference values in terms of BP position, peak width and distal fall-off were submillimetric for both particle types in the whole investigated energy range. For modulated SOBPs, a submillimetric deviation was found when comparing both experimental MLIC QUBE data against the reference values and MC calculations. The relative dose deviations for the experimental MLIC QUBE acquisitions, with respect to Peakfinder data, ranged from ~1% to ~3.5%. Maximum value of 14.1 μSv/h was measured in contact with QUBE entrance window soon after a long irradiation with carbon ions. CONCLUSION MLIC QUBE appears to be a promising detector for accurately measuring pristine ICs and SOBPs. A simple procedure to improve the intrinsic spatial resolution of the detector is proposed. Being the detector very accurate, precise, fast responding, and easy to handle, it is therefore well suited for daily checks in PT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfredo Mirandola
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Magro
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy.,Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, 20100, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Mairani
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy.,Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, 69121, Germany
| | - Silvia Molinelli
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Stefania Russo
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Edoardo Mastella
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Alessandro Vai
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| | - Davide Maestri
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy.,Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, 20100, Italy
| | | | - Mario Ciocca
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Pavia, 27100, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Giordanengo S, Manganaro L, Vignati A. Review of technologies and procedures of clinical dosimetry for scanned ion beam radiotherapy. Phys Med 2017; 43:79-99. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 09/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
|
9
|
Tajiri S, Tashiro M, Mizukami T, Tsukishima C, Torikoshi M, Kanai T. Margin estimation and disturbances of irradiation field in layer-stacking carbon-ion beams for respiratory moving targets. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2017; 58:840-848. [PMID: 28339740 PMCID: PMC5710598 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrx001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2016] [Revised: 05/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/10/2017] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Carbon-ion therapy by layer-stacking irradiation for static targets has been practised in clinical treatments. In order to apply this technique to a moving target, disturbances of carbon-ion dose distributions due to respiratory motion have been studied based on the measurement using a respiratory motion phantom, and the margin estimation given by the square root of the summation Internal margin2+Setup margin2 has been assessed. We assessed the volume in which the variation in the ratio of the dose for a target moving due to respiration relative to the dose for a static target was within 5%. The margins were insufficient for use with layer-stacking irradiation of a moving target, and an additional margin was required. The lateral movement of a target converts to the range variation, as the thickness of the range compensator changes with the movement of the target. Although the additional margin changes according to the shape of the ridge filter, dose uniformity of 5% can be achieved for a spherical target 93 mm in diameter when the upward range variation is limited to 5 mm and the additional margin of 2.5 mm is applied in case of our ridge filter. Dose uniformity in a clinical target largely depends on the shape of the mini-peak as well as on the bolus shape. We have shown the relationship between range variation and dose uniformity. In actual therapy, the upper limit of target movement should be considered by assessing the bolus shape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinya Tajiri
- Department of Heavy Ion Beam Medical Physics and Biology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, 1-1-2, Wadasaki-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe 652-8555, Japan
| | - Mutsumi Tashiro
- Research Program for Heavy Ion Therapy, Gunma University Initiative for Advanced Research, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Mizukami
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, 1-1-2, Wadasaki-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe 652-8555, Japan
| | - Chihiro Tsukishima
- Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, 1-1-2, Wadasaki-cho, Hyogo-ku, Kobe 652-8555, Japan
| | - Masami Torikoshi
- Department of Heavy Ion Beam Medical Physics and Biology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Kanai
- Department of Heavy Ion Beam Medical Physics and Biology, Gunma University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma 371-8511, Japan
- Gunma University Heavy Ion Medical Center, 3-39-22 Showa-Machi, Maebashi, Gunma, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Actis O, Meer D, König S, Weber DC, Mayor A. A comprehensive and efficient daily quality assurance for PBS proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:1661-1675. [PMID: 28166055 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa5131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
There are several general recommendations for quality assurance (QA) measures, which have to be performed at proton therapy centres. However, almost each centre uses a different therapy system. In particular, there is no standard procedure for centres employing pencil beam scanning and each centre applies a specific QA program. Gantry 2 is an operating therapy system which was developed at PSI and relies on the most advanced technological innovations. We developed a comprehensive daily QA program in order to verify the main beam characteristics to assure the functionality of the therapy delivery system and the patient safety system. The daily QA program entails new hardware and software solutions for a highly efficient clinical operation. In this paper, we describe a dosimetric phantom used for verifying the most critical beam parameters and the software architecture developed for a fully automated QA procedure. The connection between our QA software and the database allows us to store the data collected on a daily basis and use it for trend analysis over longer periods of time. All the data presented here have been collected during a time span of over two years, since the beginning of the Gantry 2 clinical operation in 2013. Our procedure operates in a stable way and delivers the expected beam quality. The daily QA program takes only 20 min. At the same time, the comprehensive approach allows us to avoid most of the weekly and monthly QA checks and increases the clinical beam availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- O Actis
- Centre for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, 5232 Villigen PSI, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Durante M, Paganetti H. Nuclear physics in particle therapy: a review. REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS. PHYSICAL SOCIETY (GREAT BRITAIN) 2016; 79:096702. [PMID: 27540827 DOI: 10.1088/0034-4885/79/9/096702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Charged particle therapy has been largely driven and influenced by nuclear physics. The increase in energy deposition density along the ion path in the body allows reducing the dose to normal tissues during radiotherapy compared to photons. Clinical results of particle therapy support the physical rationale for this treatment, but the method remains controversial because of the high cost and of the lack of comparative clinical trials proving the benefit compared to x-rays. Research in applied nuclear physics, including nuclear interactions, dosimetry, image guidance, range verification, novel accelerators and beam delivery technologies, can significantly improve the clinical outcome in particle therapy. Measurements of fragmentation cross-sections, including those for the production of positron-emitting fragments, and attenuation curves are needed for tuning Monte Carlo codes, whose use in clinical environments is rapidly increasing thanks to fast calculation methods. Existing cross sections and codes are indeed not very accurate in the energy and target regions of interest for particle therapy. These measurements are especially urgent for new ions to be used in therapy, such as helium. Furthermore, nuclear physics hardware developments are frequently finding applications in ion therapy due to similar requirements concerning sensors and real-time data processing. In this review we will briefly describe the physics bases, and concentrate on the open issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Durante
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), University of Trento, Via Sommarive 14, 38123 Povo (TN), Italy. Department of Physics, University Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Takayanagi T, Nihongi H, Nishiuchi H, Tadokoro M, Ito Y, Nakashima C, Fujitaka S, Umezawa M, Matsuda K, Sakae T, Terunuma T. Dual ring multilayer ionization chamber and theory-based correction technique for scanning proton therapy. Med Phys 2016; 43:4150. [PMID: 27370135 DOI: 10.1118/1.4953633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To develop a multilayer ionization chamber (MLIC) and a correction technique that suppresses differences between the MLIC and water phantom measurements in order to achieve fast and accurate depth dose measurements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy. METHODS The authors distinguish between a calibration procedure and an additional correction: 1-the calibration for variations in the air gap thickness and the electrometer gains is addressed without involving measurements in water; 2-the correction is addressed to suppress the difference between depth dose profiles in water and in the MLIC materials due to the nuclear interaction cross sections by a semiempirical model tuned by using measurements in water. In the correction technique, raw MLIC data are obtained for each energy layer and integrated after multiplying them by the correction factor because the correction factor depends on incident energy. The MLIC described here has been designed especially for pencil beam scanning proton therapy. This MLIC is called a dual ring multilayer ionization chamber (DRMLIC). The shape of the electrodes allows the DRMLIC to measure both the percentage depth dose (PDD) and integrated depth dose (IDD) because ionization electrons are collected from inner and outer air gaps independently. RESULTS IDDs for which the beam energies were 71.6, 120.6, 159, 180.6, and 221.4 MeV were measured and compared with water phantom results. Furthermore, the measured PDDs along the central axis of the proton field with a nominal field size of 10 × 10 cm(2) were compared. The spread out Bragg peak was 20 cm for fields with a range of 30.6 and 3 cm for fields with a range of 6.9 cm. The IDDs measured with the DRMLIC using the correction technique were consistent with those that of the water phantom; except for the beam energy of 71.6 MeV, all of the points satisfied the 1% dose/1 mm distance to agreement criterion of the gamma index. The 71.6 MeV depth dose profile showed slight differences in the shallow region, but 94.5% of the points satisfied the 1%/1 mm criterion. The 90% ranges, defined at the 90% dose position in distal fall off, were in good agreement with those in the water phantom, and the range differences from the water phantom were less than ±0.3 mm. The PDDs measured with the DRMLIC were also consistent with those that of the water phantom; 97% of the points passed the 1%/1 mm criterion. CONCLUSIONS It was demonstrated that the new correction technique suppresses the difference between the depth dose profiles obtained with the MLIC and those obtained from a water phantom, and a DRMLIC enabling fast measurements of both IDD and PDD was developed. The IDDs and PDDs measured with the DRMLIC and using the correction technique were in good agreement with those that of the water phantom, and it was concluded that the correction technique and DRMLIC are useful for depth dose profile measurements in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Yuki Ito
- Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Works, Hitachi 317-8511, Japan
| | | | | | - Masumi Umezawa
- Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Research Laboratory, Hitachi 319-1221, Japan
| | - Koji Matsuda
- Hitachi Ltd., Hitachi Works, Hitachi 317-8511, Japan
| | - Takeji Sakae
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Terunuma
- Proton Medical Research Center, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba 305-8576, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bäumer C, Koska B, Lambert J, Timmermann B, Mertens T, Takoukam Talla P. Evaluation of detectors for acquisition of pristine depth-dose curves in pencil beam scanning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015; 16:151–163. [PMID: 26699567 PMCID: PMC5691023 DOI: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i6.5577] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2015] [Revised: 05/12/2015] [Accepted: 06/02/2015] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Acquisition of quasi‐monoenergetic ("pristine") depth‐dose curves is an essential task in the frame of commissioning and quality assurance of a proton therapy treatment head. For pencil beam scanning delivery modes this is often accomplished by measuring the integral ionization in a plane perpendicular to the axis of an unscanned beam. We focus on the evaluation of three integral detectors: two of them are plane‐parallel ionization chambers with an effective radius of 4.1 cm and 6.0 cm, respectively, mounted in a scanning water phantom. The third integral detector is a 6.0 cm radius multilayer ionization chamber. The experimental results are compared with the corresponding measurements under broad field conditions, which are performed with a small radius plane‐parallel chamber and a small radius multilayer ionization chamber. We study how a measured depth‐dose curve of a pristine proton field depends on the detection device, by evaluating the shape of the depth‐dose curve, the relative charge collection efficiency, and intercomparing measured ranges. Our results show that increasing the radius of an integral chamber from 4.1 cm to 6.0 cm increases the collection efficiency by 0%–3.5% depending on beam energy and depth. Ranges can be determined by the large electrode multilayer ionization chamber with a typical uncertainty of 0.4 mm on a routine basis. The large electrode multilayer ionization chamber exhibits a small distortion in the Bragg Peak region. This prohibits its use for acquisition of base data, but is tolerable for quality assurance. The good range accuracy and the peak distortion are characteristics of the multilayer ionization chamber design, as shown by the direct comparison with the small electrode counterpart. PACS number: 87.55.Qr
Collapse
|
14
|
Dhanesar S, Sahoo N, Kerr M, Taylor MB, Summers P, Zhu XR, Poenisch F, Gillin M. Quality assurance of proton beams using a multilayer ionization chamber system. Med Phys 2013; 40:092102. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4817481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
|
15
|
Abstract
Protons are an interesting modality for radiotherapy because of their well defined range and favourable depth dose characteristics. On the other hand, these same characteristics lead to added uncertainties in their delivery. This is particularly the case at the distal end of proton dose distributions, where the dose gradient can be extremely steep. In practice however, this gradient is rarely used to spare critical normal tissues due to such worries about its exact position in the patient. Reasons for this uncertainty are inaccuracies and non-uniqueness of the calibration from CT Hounsfield units to proton stopping powers, imaging artefacts (e.g. due to metal implants) and anatomical changes of the patient during treatment. In order to improve the precision of proton therapy therefore, it would be extremely desirable to verify proton range in vivo, either prior to, during, or after therapy. In this review, we describe and compare state-of-the art in vivo proton range verification methods currently being proposed, developed or clinically implemented.
Collapse
|
16
|
Kanematsu N, Koba Y, Ogata R. Evaluation of plastic materials for range shifting, range compensation, and solid-phantom dosimetry in carbon-ion radiotherapy. Med Phys 2013; 40:041724. [DOI: 10.1118/1.4795338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
|
17
|
Liamsuwan T, Uehara S, Emfietzoglou D, Nikjoo H. Physical and biophysical properties of proton tracks of energies 1 keV to 300 MeV in water. Int J Radiat Biol 2011; 87:141-60. [DOI: 10.3109/09553002.2010.518204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
18
|
Abstract
Recently, ion beam radiotherapy (including protons as well as heavier ions) gained considerable interest. Although ion beam radiotherapy requires dose prescription in terms of iso-effective dose (referring to an iso-effective photon dose), absorbed dose is still required as an operative quantity to control beam delivery, to characterize the beam dosimetrically and to verify dose delivery. This paper reviews current methods and standards to determine absorbed dose to water in ion beam radiotherapy, including (i) the detectors used to measure absorbed dose, (ii) dosimetry under reference conditions and (iii) dosimetry under non-reference conditions. Due to the LET dependence of the response of films and solid-state detectors, dosimetric measurements are mostly based on ion chambers. While a primary standard for ion beam radiotherapy still remains to be established, ion chamber dosimetry under reference conditions is based on similar protocols as for photons and electrons although the involved uncertainty is larger than for photon beams. For non-reference conditions, dose measurements in tissue-equivalent materials may also be necessary. Regarding the atomic numbers of the composites of tissue-equivalent phantoms, special requirements have to be fulfilled for ion beams. Methods for calibrating the beam monitor depend on whether passive or active beam delivery techniques are used. QA measurements are comparable to conventional radiotherapy; however, dose verification is usually single field rather than treatment plan based. Dose verification for active beam delivery techniques requires the use of multi-channel dosimetry systems to check the compliance of measured and calculated dose for a representative sample of measurement points. Although methods for ion beam dosimetry have been established, there is still room for developments. This includes improvement of the dosimetric accuracy as well as development of more efficient measurement techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology (E040), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|