1
|
Feasibility study of conformal forward planned simultaneous integrated boost technique comparable to IMRT and VMAT in pelvic irradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. POLISH JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND ENGINEERING 2019. [DOI: 10.2478/pjmpe-2019-0015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim: To check the feasibility of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) using a forward planned field in field (FIF) conformal technique for the treatment of carcinoma of the cervix IIIB and compare it dosimetrically with other advanced inverse planning techniques.
Methods: In our study 33 patients of carcinoma of the cervix IIIB were planned for SIB using conformal FIF technique and they were compared with retrospectively planned IMRT and VMAT techniques. SIB using conformal FIF was planned by two different methods.
Results: The results of our study indicate that forward planned Conformal SIB techniques are comparable with inverse planned techniques dosimetrically, in terms of conformity Index, Homogeneity Index, Maximum dose, etc. The ability of FIF SIB plans to produce dose contrast in differential dose accumulation was compared and analyzed and the results were encouraging. To treat an advanced/bulky disease like Carcinoma of the Cervix IIIB in centers with large patient load, utilizing advanced techniques such as IMRT and VMAT is both technically and practically difficult. Despite VMAT’s shorter delivery time, the procedures involved are time-consuming.
Conclusion: Hence forward planned SIB techniques may be used to achieve similar dosimetric effects of IMRT and VMAT techniques without much compromise in plan quality and patient throughput for treating bulky carcinoma of the cervix IIIB cases. However, the clinical results need to be carefully compared and evaluated and reported.
Collapse
|
2
|
Cilla S, Deodato F, Ianiro A, Macchia G, Picardi V, Buwenge M, Cammelli S, Zamagni A, Valentini V, Morganti AG. Partially ablative radiotherapy (PAR) for large mass tumors using simultaneous integrated boost: A dose-escalation feasibility study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:35-43. [PMID: 30220111 PMCID: PMC6236838 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to assess the feasibility to plan and deliver highly heterogeneous doses to symptomatic large tumors using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) during a short course palliative accelerated radiotherapy. Methods A patient with a large symptomatic chordoma infiltrating the right gluteal region was selected. A modified SIB treatment was implemented to irradiate the central volume of the tumor (boost target volume, BTV) up to 10 Gy/fraction in a dose escalation trial while maintaining the remaining tumor volume (planning target volume, PTV) and the surrounding healthy tissues within 5 Gy/fraction in twice daily fractions for two consecutive days. Four SIB plans were generated in the dual‐arc modality; a basal dose of 20 Gy was prescribed to the PTV, while the BTV was boosted up to 40 Gy. For comparison purposes, plans obtained with a sequential boost (SEQ plans) were also generated. All plans were optimized to deliver at least 95% of the prescription dose to the targets. Dose contrast index (DCI), conformity index (CI), integral dose (ID), and the irradiated body volumes at 5, 10, and 20 Gy were evaluated. Results At equal targets coverage, SIB plans provided major improvement in DCI, CI, and ID with respect to SEQ plans. When BTV dose escalated up to 200% of PTV prescription, DCI resulted in 66% for SIB plans and 37% for SEQ plans; the ID increase was only 11% for SIB plans (vs 27% for SEQ plans) and the increase in healthy tissues receiving more than 5, 10, and 20 Gy was less than 2%. Pretreatment dose verification reported a γ‐value passing rate greater than 95% with 3%(global)‐2 mm. Conclusion A modified SIB technique is dosimetrically feasible for large tumors, where doses higher than the tolerance dose of healthy tissues are necessary to increase the therapeutic gain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Anna Ianiro
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvia Cammelli
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di Ricerca e Cura Giovanni Paolo II - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Department, Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Department, DIMES Università di Bologna - Ospedale S.Orsola Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li MH, Huang SF, Chang CC, Lin JC, Tsai JT. Variations in dosimetric distribution and plan complexity with collimator angles in hypofractionated volumetric arc radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2018; 19:93-102. [PMID: 29322625 PMCID: PMC5849828 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/05/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Hypofractionated radiotherapy can reduce treatment durations and produce effects identical to those of conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for treating prostate cancer. Volumetric arc radiotherapy (VMAT) can decrease the treatment machine monitor units (MUs). Previous studies have shown that VMAT with multileaf collimator (MLC) rotation exhibits better target dose distribution. Thus, VMAT with MLC rotation warrants further investigation. Methods and materials Ten patients with prostate cancer were included in this study. The prostate gland and seminal vesicle received 68.75 and 55 Gy, respectively, in 25 fractions. A dual‐arc VMAT plan with a collimator angle of 0° was generated and the same constraints were used to reoptimize VMAT plans with different collimator angles. The conformity index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), gradient index (GI), normalized dose contrast (NDC), MU, and modulation complexity score (MCSV) of the target were analyzed. The dose–volume histogram of the adjacent organs was analyzed. A Wilcoxon signed‐rank test was used to compare different collimator angles. Results Optimum values of CI, HI, and MCSV were obtained with a collimator angle of 45°. The optimum values of GI, and NDC were observed with a collimator angle of 0°. In the rectum, the highest values of maximum dose and volume receiving 60 Gy (V60 Gy) were obtained with a collimator angle of 0°, and the lowest value of mean dose (Dmean) was obtained with a collimator angle of 45°. In the bladder, high values of Dmean were obtained with collimator angles of 75° and 90°. In the rectum and bladder, the values of V60 Gy obtained with the other tested angles were not significantly higher than those obtained with an angle of 0°. Conclusion This study found that MLC rotation affects VMAT plan complexity and dosimetric distribution. A collimator angle of 45° exhibited the optimal values of CI, HI, and MCSv among all the tested collimator angles. Late side effects of the rectum and bladder are associated with high‐dose volumes by previous studies. MLC rotation did not have statistically significantly higher values of V60 Gy in the rectum and bladder than did the 0° angle. We thought a collimator angle of 45° was an optimal angle for the prostate VMAT treatment plan. The findings can serve as a guide for collimator angle selection in prostate hypofractionated VMAT planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming-Hsien Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Sheng-Fang Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Chih-Chieh Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Jang-Chun Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| | - Jo-Ting Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Farzin M, Molls M, Astner S, Rondak IC, Oechsner M. Simultaneous integrated vs. sequential boost in VMAT radiotherapy of high-grade gliomas. Strahlenther Onkol 2015; 191:945-52. [PMID: 26340939 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-015-0888-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 08/07/2015] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 20 patients with high-grade gliomas, we compared two methods of planning for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT): simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) vs. sequential boost (SEB). The investigation focused on the analysis of dose distributions in the target volumes and the organs at risk (OARs). METHOD After contouring the target volumes [planning target volumes (PTVs) and boost volumes (BVs)] and OARs, SIB planning and SEB planning were performed. The SEB method consisted of two plans: in the first plan the PTV received 50 Gy in 25 fractions with a 2-Gy dose per fraction. In the second plan the BV received 10 Gy in 5 fractions with a dose per fraction of 2 Gy. The doses of both plans were summed up to show the total doses delivered. In the SIB method the PTV received 54 Gy in 30 fractions with a dose per fraction of 1.8 Gy, while the BV received 60 Gy in the same fraction number but with a dose per fraction of 2 Gy. RESULTS All of the OARs showed higher doses (Dmax and Dmean) in the SEB method when compared with the SIB technique. The differences between the two methods were statistically significant in almost all of the OARs. Analysing the total doses of the target volumes we found dose distributions with similar homogeneities and comparable total doses. CONCLUSION Our analysis shows that the SIB method offers advantages over the SEB method in terms of sparing OARs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mostafa Farzin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. .,Brain and Spinal Cord Injury Research Center, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.
| | - Michael Molls
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Sabrina Astner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Ina-Christine Rondak
- Institut für Medizinische Statistik und Epidemiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Strasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang W, Reznik R, Fraass BA, Nissen N, Hendifar A, Wachsman A, Sandler H, Tuli R. Dosimetric evaluation of simultaneous integrated boost during stereotactic body radiation therapy for pancreatic cancer. Med Dosim 2015; 40:47-52. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2014] [Revised: 06/27/2014] [Accepted: 09/19/2014] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
6
|
Cilla S, Deodato F, Digesù C, Macchia G, Picardi V, Ferro M, Sallustio G, De Spirito M, Piermattei A, Morganti AG. Assessing the feasibility of volumetric-modulated arc therapy using simultaneous integrated boost (SIB-VMAT): An analysis for complex head-neck, high-risk prostate and rectal cancer cases. Med Dosim 2013; 39:108-16. [PMID: 24342167 DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2013] [Revised: 10/02/2013] [Accepted: 11/11/2013] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) allowed the simultaneous delivery of different doses to different target volumes within a single fraction, an approach called simultaneous integrated boost (SIB). As consequence, the fraction dose to the boost volume can be increased while keeping low doses to the elective volumes, and the number of fractions and overall treatment time will be reduced, translating into better radiobiological effectiveness. In recent years, volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been shown to provide similar plan quality with respect to fixed-field IMRT but with large reduction in treatment time and monitor units (MUs) number. However, the feasibility of VMAT when used with SIB strategy has few investigations to date. We explored the potential of VMAT in a SIB strategy for complex cancer sites. A total of 15 patients were selected, including 5 head-and-neck, 5 high-risk prostate, and 5 rectal cancer cases. Both a double-arc VMAT and a 7-field IMRT plan were generated for each case using Oncentra MasterPlan treatment planning system for an Elekta Precise linac. Dosimetric indexes for targets and organs at risk (OARs) were compared based on dose-volume histograms. Conformity index, homogeneity index, and dose-contrast index were used for target analyses. The equivalent uniform doses and the normal tissue complication probabilities were calculated for main OARs. MUs number and treatment time were analyzed to score treatment efficiency. Pretreatment dosimetry was performed using 2-dimensional (2D)-array dosimeter. SIB-VMAT plans showed a high level of fluence modulation needed for SIB treatments, high conformal dose distribution, similar target coverage, and a tendency to improve OARs sparing compared with the benchmark SIB-IMRT plans. The median treatment times reduced from 13 to 20 minutes to approximately 5 minutes for all cases with SIB-VMAT, with a MUs reduction up to 22.5%. The 2D-array ion-chambers' measurements reported an agreement of more than 95% for a criterion of 3% to 3mm. SIB-VMAT was able to combine the advantages of conventional SIB-IMRT with its highly conformal dose distribution and OARs sparing and the advantages of 3D-conformal radiotherapy with its fast delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Cinzia Digesù
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Picardi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Marica Ferro
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Giuseppina Sallustio
- Radiology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Marco De Spirito
- Physics Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Angelo Piermattei
- Physics Institute, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Fondazione di ricerca e cura "Giovanni Paolo II," Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Haas OCL, Skworcow P, Paluszczyszyn D, Sahih A, Ruta M, Mills JA. Couch-based motion compensation: modelling, simulation and real-time experiments. Phys Med Biol 2012; 57:5787-807. [DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/57/18/5787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|