1
|
Mohd Amin AT, Mokri SS, Ahmad R, Rahni AAA. Evaluation of Data Driven Respiratory Signal Extraction Methods from Cone-Beam CT using MR-based Digital Phantoms. 2021 IEEE NUCLEAR SCIENCE SYMPOSIUM AND MEDICAL IMAGING CONFERENCE (NSS/MIC) 2021. [DOI: 10.1109/nss/mic44867.2021.9875497] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - R. Ahmad
- Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia,Malaysia
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tsai P, Yan G, Liu C, Hung Y, Kahler DL, Park J, Potter N, Li JG, Lu B. Tumor phase recognition using cone‐beam computed tomography projections and external surrogate information. Med Phys 2020; 47:5077-5089. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.14298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Revised: 05/10/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pingfang Tsai
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Guanghua Yan
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Chihray Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Ying‐Chao Hung
- Department of Statistics National Chengchi University Taipei11604 Taiwan
| | - Darren L. Kahler
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Ji‐Yeon Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Nick Potter
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Jonathan G. Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| | - Bo Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology College of Medicine University of Florida Gainesville Fl32610‐0385 USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Vergalasova I, Cai J. A modern review of the uncertainties in volumetric imaging of respiratory-induced target motion in lung radiotherapy. Med Phys 2020; 47:e988-e1008. [PMID: 32506452 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2019] [Revised: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy has become a critical component for the treatment of all stages and types of lung cancer, often times being the primary gateway to a cure. However, given that radiation can cause harmful side effects depending on how much surrounding healthy tissue is exposed, treatment of the lung can be particularly challenging due to the presence of moving targets. Careful implementation of every step in the radiotherapy process is absolutely integral for attaining optimal clinical outcomes. With the advent and now widespread use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), where extremely large doses are delivered, accurate, and precise dose targeting is especially vital to achieve an optimal risk to benefit ratio. This has largely become possible due to the rapid development of image-guided technology. Although imaging is critical to the success of radiotherapy, it can often be plagued with uncertainties due to respiratory-induced target motion. There has and continues to be an immense research effort aimed at acknowledging and addressing these uncertainties to further our abilities to more precisely target radiation treatment. Thus, the goal of this article is to provide a detailed review of the prevailing uncertainties that remain to be investigated across the different imaging modalities, as well as to highlight the more modern solutions to imaging motion and their role in addressing the current challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irina Vergalasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohd Amin AT, Mokri SS, Ahmad R, Abd Rahni AA. Comparison of data-driven respiratory signal extraction methods from cone-beam CT (CBCT). JOURNAL OF PHYSICS: CONFERENCE SERIES 2020; 1497:012004. [DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1497/1/012004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Abstract
In Cone-Beam CT (CBCT) imaging, respiratory motion needs to be considered to mitigate motion artifacts thus increasing the accuracy of reconstructed images. Data driven methods can be used to extract respiratory signal directly from projection data without requiring any additional equipment or surrogate devices. Digital phantoms provide an adequate option to evaluate developing methods prior to clinical implementation. In this study, four data driven methods are used to extract respiratory signal from simulated projections. An in-house 4D MRI-based CBCT digital phantom is used, where actual respiratory signal is available as ground truth. In comparing all four data driven methods, the respiratory signal extracted using the Local Principal Component Analysis (LPCA) method is found to be robust and yielded the highest correlation coefficient of 0.8644 compared to the ground truth.
Collapse
|
5
|
Harris W, Zhang Y, Yin FF, Ren L. Estimating 4D-CBCT from prior information and extremely limited angle projections using structural PCA and weighted free-form deformation for lung radiotherapy. Med Phys 2017; 44:1089-1104. [PMID: 28079267 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2016] [Revised: 11/18/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility of using structural-based principal component analysis (PCA) motion-modeling and weighted free-form deformation to estimate on-board 4D-CBCT using prior information and extremely limited angle projections for potential 4D target verification of lung radiotherapy. METHODS A technique for lung 4D-CBCT reconstruction has been previously developed using a deformation field map (DFM)-based strategy. In the previous method, each phase of the 4D-CBCT was generated by deforming a prior CT volume. The DFM was solved by a motion model extracted by a global PCA and free-form deformation (GMM-FD) technique, using a data fidelity constraint and deformation energy minimization. In this study, a new structural PCA method was developed to build a structural motion model (SMM) by accounting for potential relative motion pattern changes between different anatomical structures from simulation to treatment. The motion model extracted from planning 4DCT was divided into two structures: tumor and body excluding tumor, and the parameters of both structures were optimized together. Weighted free-form deformation (WFD) was employed afterwards to introduce flexibility in adjusting the weightings of different structures in the data fidelity constraint based on clinical interests. XCAT (computerized patient model) simulation with a 30 mm diameter lesion was simulated with various anatomical and respiratory changes from planning 4D-CT to on-board volume to evaluate the method. The estimation accuracy was evaluated by the volume percent difference (VPD)/center-of-mass-shift (COMS) between lesions in the estimated and "ground-truth" on-board 4D-CBCT. Different on-board projection acquisition scenarios and projection noise levels were simulated to investigate their effects on the estimation accuracy. The method was also evaluated against three lung patients. RESULTS The SMM-WFD method achieved substantially better accuracy than the GMM-FD method for CBCT estimation using extremely small scan angles or projections. Using orthogonal 15° scanning angles, the VPD/COMS were 3.47 ± 2.94% and 0.23 ± 0.22 mm for SMM-WFD and 25.23 ± 19.01% and 2.58 ± 2.54 mm for GMM-FD among all eight XCAT scenarios. Compared to GMM-FD, SMM-WFD was more robust against reduction of the scanning angles down to orthogonal 10° with VPD/COMS of 6.21 ± 5.61% and 0.39 ± 0.49 mm, and more robust against reduction of projection numbers down to only 8 projections in total for both orthogonal-view 30° and orthogonal-view 15° scan angles. SMM-WFD method was also more robust than the GMM-FD method against increasing levels of noise in the projection images. Additionally, the SMM-WFD technique provided better tumor estimation for all three lung patients compared to the GMM-FD technique. CONCLUSION Compared to the GMM-FD technique, the SMM-WFD technique can substantially improve the 4D-CBCT estimation accuracy using extremely small scan angles and low number of projections to provide fast low dose 4D target verification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy Harris
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - You Zhang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Lei Ren
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27705, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Dang J, Yin FF, You T, Dai C, Chen D, Wang J. Simultaneous 4D-CBCT reconstruction with sliding motion constraint. Med Phys 2017; 43:5453. [PMID: 27782722 DOI: 10.1118/1.4959998] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Current approaches using deformable vector field (DVF) for motion-compensated 4D-cone beam CT (CBCT) reconstruction typically utilize an isotropically smoothed DVF between different respiration phases. Such isotropically smoothed DVF does not work well if sliding motion exists between neighboring organs. This study investigated an anisotropic motion modeling scheme by extracting organ boundary local motions (e.g., sliding) and incorporated them into 4D-CBCT reconstruction to optimize the motion modeling and reconstruction methods. METHODS Initially, a modified simultaneous algebraic reconstruction technique (mSART) was applied to reconstruct high quality reference phase CBCT using all phase projections. The initial DVFs were precalculated and subsequently updated to achieve the optimized solution. During the DVF update, sliding motion estimation was performed by matching the measured projections to the forward projection of the deformed reference phase CBCT. In this process, each moving organ boundary was first segmented. The normal vectors of the boundary DVF were then extracted and incorporated for further DVF optimization. The regularization term in the objective function adaptively regularizes the DVF by (1) isotopically smoothing the DVF within each organ; (2) smoothing the DVF at boundary along the normal direction; and (3) leaving the tangent direction of boundary DVF unsmoothed (i.e., allowing for sliding motion). A nonlinear conjugate gradient optimizer was used. The algorithm was validated on a digital cubic tube phantom with sliding motion, nonuniform rotational B-spline based cardiac-torso (NCAT) phantom, and two anonymized patient data. The relative reconstruction error (RE), the motion trajectory's root mean square error (RMSE) together with its maximum error (MaxE), and the Dice coefficient of the lung boundary were calculated to evaluate the algorithm performance. RESULTS For the cubic tube and NCAT phantom tests, the REs are 10.2% and 7.4% with sliding motion compensation, compared to 13.4% and 8.9% without sliding modeling. The motion trajectory's RMSE and MaxE for NCAT phantom tests are 0.5 and 0.8 mm with sliding motion constraint compared to 3.5 and 7.3 mm without sliding motion modeling. The Dice coefficients for both NCAT phantom and the patients show a consistent trend that sliding motion constraint achieves better similarity for segmented lung boundary compared with the ground truth or patient reference. CONCLUSIONS A sliding motion-compensated 4D-CBCT reconstruction and the motion modeling scheme was developed. Both phantom and patient study demonstrated the improved accuracy and motion modeling accuracy in reconstructed 4D-CBCT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Dang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27705 and Department of Medical Physics, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan 215316, China
| | - Tao You
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China
| | - Chunhua Dai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China
| | - Deyu Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang 212000, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75390
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang Y, Yin FF, Pan T, Vergalasova I, Ren L. Preliminary clinical evaluation of a 4D-CBCT estimation technique using prior information and limited-angle projections. Radiother Oncol 2015; 115:22-9. [PMID: 25818396 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2014] [Revised: 02/20/2015] [Accepted: 02/24/2015] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A technique has been previously reported to estimate high-quality 4D-CBCT using prior information and limited-angle projections. This study is to investigate its clinical feasibility through both phantom and patient studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The new technique used to estimate 4D-CBCT is called MMFD-NCC. It is based on the previously reported motion modeling and free-form deformation (MMFD) method, with the introduction of normalized-cross-correlation (NCC) as a new similarity metric. The clinical feasibility of this technique was evaluated by assessing the accuracy of estimated anatomical structures in comparison to those in the 'ground-truth' reference 4D-CBCTs, using data obtained from a physical phantom and three lung cancer patients. Both volume percentage error (VPE) and center-of-mass error (COME) of the estimated tumor volume were used as the evaluation metrics. RESULTS The average VPE/COME of the tumor in the prior image was 257.1%/10.1 mm for the phantom study and 55.6%/3.8 mm for the patient study. Using only orthogonal-view 30° projections, the MMFD-NCC has reduced the corresponding values to 7.7%/1.2 mm and 9.6%/1.1 mm, respectively. CONCLUSION The MMFD-NCC technique is able to estimate 4D-CBCT images with geometrical accuracy of the tumor within 10% VPE and 2 mm COME, which can be used to improve the localization accuracy of radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Zhang
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA.
| | - Fang-Fang Yin
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Tinsu Pan
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Irina Vergalasova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| | - Lei Ren
- Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University, Durham, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Martin R, Rubinstein A, Ahmad M, Court L, Pan T. Evaluation of intrinsic respiratory signal determination methods for 4D CBCT adapted for mice. Med Phys 2015; 42:154-64. [PMID: 25563256 DOI: 10.1118/1.4903264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE 4D CT imaging in mice is important in a variety of areas including studies of lung function and tumor motion. A necessary step in 4D imaging is obtaining a respiratory signal, which can be done through an external system or intrinsically through the projection images. A number of methods have been developed that can successfully determine the respiratory signal from cone-beam projection images of humans, however only a few have been utilized in a preclinical setting and most of these rely on step-and-shoot style imaging. The purpose of this work is to assess and make adaptions of several successful methods developed for humans for an image-guided preclinical radiation therapy system. METHODS Respiratory signals were determined from the projection images of free-breathing mice scanned on the X-RAD system using four methods: the so-called Amsterdam shroud method, a method based on the phase of the Fourier transform, a pixel intensity method, and a center of mass method. The Amsterdam shroud method was modified so the sharp inspiration peaks associated with anesthetized mouse breathing could be detected. Respiratory signals were used to sort projections into phase bins and 4D images were reconstructed. Error and standard deviation in the assignment of phase bins for the four methods compared to a manual method considered to be ground truth were calculated for a range of region of interest (ROI) sizes. Qualitative comparisons were additionally made between the 4D images obtained using each of the methods and the manual method. RESULTS 4D images were successfully created for all mice with each of the respiratory signal extraction methods. Only minimal qualitative differences were noted between each of the methods and the manual method. The average error (and standard deviation) in phase bin assignment was 0.24 ± 0.08 (0.49 ± 0.11) phase bins for the Fourier transform method, 0.09 ± 0.03 (0.31 ± 0.08) phase bins for the modified Amsterdam shroud method, 0.09 ± 0.02 (0.33 ± 0.07) phase bins for the intensity method, and 0.37 ± 0.10 (0.57 ± 0.08) phase bins for the center of mass method. Little dependence on ROI size was noted for the modified Amsterdam shroud and intensity methods while the Fourier transform and center of mass methods showed a noticeable dependence on the ROI size. CONCLUSIONS The modified Amsterdam shroud, Fourier transform, and intensity respiratory signal methods are sufficiently accurate to be used for 4D imaging on the X-RAD system and show improvement over the existing center of mass method. The intensity and modified Amsterdam shroud methods are recommended due to their high accuracy and low dependence on ROI size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Martin
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 and The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Ashley Rubinstein
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030 and Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Moiz Ahmad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305
| | - Laurence Court
- The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030 and Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030
| | - Tinsu Pan
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 and The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas 77030
| |
Collapse
|