1
|
Henjum H, Dahle TJ, Mairani A, Pilskog S, Stokkevåg C, Boer CG, Redalen KR, Minn H, Malinen E, Ytre‐Hauge KS. Combined RBE and OER optimization in proton therapy with FLUKA based on EF5-PET. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14014. [PMID: 37161820 PMCID: PMC10476997 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Tumor hypoxia is associated with poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic regions are more radioresistant than well-oxygenated regions, as quantified by the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In optimization of proton therapy, including OER in addition to the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) could therefore be used to adapt to patient-specific radioresistance governed by intrinsic radiosensitivity and hypoxia. METHODS A combined RBE and OER weighted dose (ROWD) calculation method was implemented in a FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) based treatment planning tool. The method is based on the linear quadratic model, with α and β parameters as a function of the OER, and therefore a function of the linear energy transfer (LET) and partial oxygen pressure (pO2 ). Proton therapy plans for two head and neck cancer (HNC) patients were optimized with pO2 estimated from [18 F]-EF5 positron emission tomography (PET) images. For the ROWD calculations, an RBE of 1.1 (RBE1.1,OER ) and two variable RBE models, Rørvik (ROR) and McNamara (MCN), were used, alongside a reference plan without incorporation of OER (RBE1.1 ). RESULTS For the HNC patients, treatment plans in line with the prescription dose and with acceptable target ROWD could be generated with the established tool. The physical dose was the main factor modulated in the ROWD. The impact of incorporating OER during optimization of HNC patients was demonstrated by the substantial difference found between ROWD and physical dose in the hypoxic tumor region. The largest physical dose differences between the ROWD optimized plans and the reference plan was 12.2 Gy. CONCLUSION The FLUKA MC based tool was able to optimize proton treatment plans taking the tumor pO2 distribution from hypoxia PET images into account. Independent of RBE-model, both elevated LET and physical dose were found in the hypoxic regions, which shows the potential to increase the tumor control compared to a conventional optimization approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
| | - Tordis Johnsen Dahle
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation)PaviaItaly
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Sara Pilskog
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | - Camilla Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and TechnologyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
- Department of Oncology and Medical PhysicsHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
| | | | - Kathrine Røe Redalen
- Department of PhysicsNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
| | - Heikki Minn
- Department of Oncology and RadiotherapyTurku University HospitalTurkuFinland
- Turku PET CentreUniversity of TurkuTurkuFinland
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of PhysicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
- Department of Medical PhysicsOslo University HospitalOsloNorway
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Inaniwa T, Kanematsu N. Event-by-event approach to the oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model for hypofractionated multi-ion therapy. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2023:rrad049. [PMID: 37421442 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrad049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
An oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic (OSMK) model was previously developed to estimate the survival fraction of cells exposed to charged-particle beams with wide dose and linear energy transfer (LET) ranges under various oxygen conditions. In the model, hypoxia-induced radioresistance was formulated based on the dose-averaged radiation quality. This approximation may cause inaccuracy in the estimation of the biological effectiveness of the radiation with wide variation in energy deposited to a sensitive volume per event, such as spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) beams. The purpose of this study was to apply an alternative approach so as to consider the energy depositions on an event-by-event basis. The production probability of radiation-induced lesions per energy was formulated with oxygen partial pressure to account for the hypoxia-induced radioresistance. The reduction in the oxygen enhancement ratio for high-LET radiations was modeled by reducing the sensitive-volume size and increasing the saturation energy in microdosimetry. The modified OSMK model was tested against the reported survival data of three cell lines exposed to six species of ions with wide dose and LET ranges under aerobic and hypoxic conditions. The model reasonably reproduced the reported cell survival data. To evaluate the event-by-event approach, survival distributions of Chinese hamster ovary cells exposed to SOBP beams were estimated using the original and modified OSMK models. The differences in the estimated survival distributions between the models were marginal even under extreme hypoxia. The event-by-event approach improved the theoretical validity of the OSMK model. However, the original OSMK model can still provide an accurate estimation of the biological effectiveness of therapeutic radiations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kanematsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakano H, Shiinoki T, Tanabe S, Nakano T, Takizawa T, Utsunomiya S, Sakai M, Tanabe S, Ohta A, Kaidu M, Nishio T, Ishikawa H. Multicomponent mathematical model for tumor volume calculation with setup error using single-isocenter stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases. Phys Eng Sci Med 2023; 46:945-953. [PMID: 36940064 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-023-01241-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
We evaluated the tumor residual volumes considering six degrees-of-freedom (6DoF) patient setup errors in stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) with multicomponent mathematical model using single-isocenter irradiation for brain metastases. Simulated spherical gross tumor volumes (GTVs) with 1.0 (GTV 1), 2.0 (GTV 2), and 3.0 (GTV 3)-cm diameters were used. The distance between the GTV center and isocenter (d) was set at 0-10 cm. The GTV was simultaneously translated within 0-1.0 mm (T) and rotated within 0°-1.0° (R) in the three axis directions using affine transformation. We optimized the tumor growth model parameters using measurements of non-small cell lung cancer cell lines' (A549 and NCI-H460) growth. We calculated the GTV residual volume at the irradiation's end using the physical dose to the GTV when the GTV size, d, and 6DoF setup error varied. The d-values that satisfy tolerance values (10%, 35%, and 50%) of the GTV residual volume rate based on the pre-irradiation GTV volume were determined. The larger the tolerance value set for both cell lines, the longer the distance to satisfy the tolerance value. In GTV residual volume evaluations based on the multicomponent mathematical model on SRT with single-isocenter irradiation, the smaller the GTV size and the larger the distance and 6DoF setup error, the shorter the distance that satisfies the tolerance value might need to be.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hisashi Nakano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan. .,Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita-Shi, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Takehiro Shiinoki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yamaguchi University, Minamikogushi 1-1-1 Ube, Yamaguchi, Japan
| | - Satoshi Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Toshimichi Nakano
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takeshi Takizawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata Neurosurgical Hospital, 3057 Yamada, Nishi-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Satoru Utsunomiya
- Department of Radiological Technology, Niigata University Graduate School of Health Sciences, 2-746 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Madoka Sakai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Shunpei Tanabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Atsushi Ohta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Motoki Kaidu
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| | - Teiji Nishio
- Department of Medical Physics and Engineering, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita-Shi, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-Dori, Chuo-Ku, Niigata-Shi, Niigata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Parisi A, Beltran CJ, Furutani KM. The Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model of clonogenic survival: formalism and first benchmark against in vitro and in silico data. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac7375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Objective. To develop a new model (Mayo Clinic Florida microdosimetric kinetic model, MCF MKM) capable of accurately describing the in vitro clonogenic survival at low and high linear energy transfer (LET) using single-event microdosimetric spectra in a single target. Methodology. The MCF MKM is based on the ‘post-processing average’ implementation of the non-Poisson microdosimetric kinetic model and includes a novel expression to compute the particle-specific quadratic-dependence of the cell survival with respect to dose (β of the linear-quadratic model). A new methodology to a priori calculate the mean radius of the MCF MKM subnuclear domains is also introduced. Lineal energy spectra were simulated with the Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System (PHITS) for 1H, 4He, 12C, 20Ne, 40Ar, 56Fe, and 132Xe ions and used in combination with the MCF MKM to calculate the ion-specific LET-dependence of the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) for Chinese hamster lung fibroblasts (V79 cell line) and human salivary gland tumor cells (HSG cell line). The results were compared with in vitro data from the Particle Irradiation Data Ensemble (PIDE) and in silico results of different models. The possibility of performing experiment-specific predictions to explain the scatter in the in vitro RBE data was also investigated. Finally, a sensitivity analysis on the model parameters is also included. Main results. The RBE values predicted with the MCF MKM were found to be in good agreement with the in vitro data for all tested conditions. Though all MCF MKM model parameters were determined a priori, the accuracy of the MCF MKM was found to be comparable or superior to that of other models. The model parameters determined a priori were in good agreement with the ones obtained by fitting all available in vitro data. Significance. The MCF MKM will be considered for implementation in cancer radiotherapy treatment planning with accelerated ions.
Collapse
|
5
|
Mairani A, Mein S, Blakely E, Debus J, Durante M, Ferrari A, Fuchs H, Georg D, Grosshans DR, Guan F, Haberer T, Harrabi S, Horst F, Inaniwa T, Karger CP, Mohan R, Paganetti H, Parodi K, Sala P, Schuy C, Tessonnier T, Titt U, Weber U. Roadmap: helium ion therapy. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67. [PMID: 35395649 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac65d3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Helium ion beam therapy for the treatment of cancer was one of several developed and studied particle treatments in the 1950s, leading to clinical trials beginning in 1975 at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. The trial shutdown was followed by decades of research and clinical silence on the topic while proton and carbon ion therapy made debuts at research facilities and academic hospitals worldwide. The lack of progression in understanding the principle facets of helium ion beam therapy in terms of physics, biological and clinical findings persists today, mainly attributable to its highly limited availability. Despite this major setback, there is an increasing focus on evaluating and establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams, with both therapy and imaging initiatives to supplement the clinical palette of radiotherapy in the treatment of aggressive disease and sensitive clinical cases. Moreover, due its intermediate physical and radio-biological properties between proton and carbon ion beams, helium ions may provide a streamlined economic steppingstone towards an era of widespread use of different particle species in light and heavy ion therapy. With respect to the clinical proton beams, helium ions exhibit superior physical properties such as reduced lateral scattering and range straggling with higher relative biological effectiveness (RBE) and dose-weighted linear energy transfer (LETd) ranging from ∼4 keVμm-1to ∼40 keVμm-1. In the frame of heavy ion therapy using carbon, oxygen or neon ions, where LETdincreases beyond 100 keVμm-1, helium ions exhibit similar physical attributes such as a sharp lateral penumbra, however, with reduced radio-biological uncertainties and without potentially spoiling dose distributions due to excess fragmentation of heavier ion beams, particularly for higher penetration depths. This roadmap presents an overview of the current state-of-the-art and future directions of helium ion therapy: understanding physics and improving modeling, understanding biology and improving modeling, imaging techniques using helium ions and refining and establishing clinical approaches and aims from learned experience with protons. These topics are organized and presented into three main sections, outlining current and future tasks in establishing clinical and research programs using helium ion beams-A. Physics B. Biological and C. Clinical Perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mairani
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stewart Mein
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eleanor Blakely
- Biological Systems and Engineering Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, United States of America
| | - Jürgen Debus
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany.,Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Alfredo Ferrari
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hermann Fuchs
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria.,MedAustron Ion Therapy Center, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - David R Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Fada Guan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America.,Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510, United States of America
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Felix Horst
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Medical Physics Laboratory, Division of Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, 1-7 Yamadaoka, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Radhe Mohan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, United States of America.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Katia Parodi
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Paola Sala
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department of Experimental Physics-Medical Physics, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Schuy
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Uwe Titt
- The University of Texas MD Anderson cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Ulrich Weber
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Taghipour H, Taherparvar P. Development of modified microdosimetric kinetic model for relative biological effectiveness in proton therapy. RADIATION AND ENVIRONMENTAL BIOPHYSICS 2022; 61:375-390. [PMID: 35699753 DOI: 10.1007/s00411-022-00977-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 05/22/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
To predict the biological effects of ionising radiation, the quantity of biological dose is introduced instead of the physical absorbed dose. In proton therapy, a constant relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 is usually applied clinically as recommended by the International Commission of Radiation Units and Measurements. This study presents a new model, based on the modified microdosimetric kinetic model (MMKM), for calculating variable RBE values based on experimental data on the induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) within cells. The MMKM was proposed based on experimental data for the yield of DSBs in mammalian cells, which allows modification of the yield of primary lesions in the MKM. In this approach, a unique function named f(LET), which describes the relation between RBE and linear energy transfer (LET), was considered for charged particles. In the presented model (DMMKM), the MMKM approach was developed further by considering different f(LET)s for different relevant ions involved in energy deposition events in proton therapy. Although experimental data represent the dependence of the yield of primary lesions on the ion species, the DSB yield (assumed as the main primary lesion) is assumed independent of the ion species in the MMKM. In the DMMKM, by considering the yield of primary lesions as a function of the ion species, the α and β values are in better agreement with the experimental data as compared to those of the MKM and MMKM approaches. The biological dose in the DMMKM is predicted to be lower than that in the MMKM. Further, in the proposed model, the variation of the β parameter is higher than the constant value assumed in the MKM, at the distal end of the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). Moreover, the level of cell death estimated by the MMKM at the SOBP region is higher than that obtained based on the DMMKM. It is concluded that considering modified f(LET)s in the model developed here is more consistent with experimental results than when MMKM and MKM approaches are considered. The DMMKM examines the biological effects with full detail and will, therefore, be effective in improving proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hossein Taghipour
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Namjoo Avenue, P.O. Box 41635-1914, Rasht, 4193833697, Guilan, Iran
| | - Payvand Taherparvar
- Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Guilan, Namjoo Avenue, P.O. Box 41635-1914, Rasht, 4193833697, Guilan, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Inaniwa T, Kanematsu N, Shinoto M, Koto M, Yamada S. Adaptation of stochastic microdosimetric kinetic model to hypoxia for hypo-fractionated multi-ion therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34560678 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac29cc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
For hypo-fractionated multi-ion therapy (HFMIT), the stochastic microdosimetric kinetic (SMK) model had been developed to estimate the biological effectiveness of radiation beams with wide linear energy transfer (LET) and dose ranges. The HFMIT will be applied to radioresistant tumors with oxygen-deficient regions. The response of cells to radiation is strongly dependent on the oxygen condition in addition to radiation type, LET and absorbed dose. This study presents an adaptation of the SMK model to account for oxygen-pressure dependent cell responses, and develops the oxygen-effect-incorporated stochastic microdosimetric kinetic (OSMK) model. In the model, following assumptions were made: the numbers of radiation-induced sublethal lesions (double-strand breaks) are reduced due to lack of oxygen, and the numbers of oxygen-mediated lesions are reduced for radiation with high LET. The model parameters were determined by fitting survival data under aerobic and anoxic conditions for human salivary gland tumor cells and V79 cells exposed to helium-, carbon-, and neon-ion beams over the LET range of 18.5-654.0 keVμm-1. The OSMK model provided good agreement with the experimental survival data of the cells with determination coefficients >0.9. In terms of oxygen enhancement ratio, the OSMK model reproduced the experimental data behavior, including slight dependence on particle type at the same LET. The OSMK model was then implemented into the in-house treatment planning software for the HFMIT to validate its applicability in clinical practice. A treatment plan with helium- and neon-ion beams was made for a pancreatic cancer case assuming an oxygen-deficient region within the tumor. The biological optimization based on the OSMK model preferentially placed the neon-ion beam to the hypoxic region, while it placed both helium- and neon-ion beams to the surrounding normoxic region. The OSMK model offered the accuracy and usability required for hypoxia-based biological optimization in HFMIT treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taku Inaniwa
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Kanematsu
- Department of Accelerator and Medical Physics, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Makoto Shinoto
- QST Hospital, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Masashi Koto
- QST Hospital, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- QST Hospital, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan.,Department of Charged Particle Therapy Research, Institute for Quantum Medical Science, QST, 4-9-1 Anagawa, Inage-ku, Chiba 263-8555, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Mein S, Tessonnier T, Kopp B, Harrabi S, Abdollahi A, Debus J, Haberer T, Mairani A. Spot-Scanning Hadron Arc (SHArc) Therapy: A Study With Light and Heavy Ions. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100661. [PMID: 33817410 PMCID: PMC8010580 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2020] [Revised: 12/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the clinical potential of spot-scanning hadron arc (SHArc) therapy with a heavy-ion gantry. METHODS AND MATERIALS A series of in silico studies was conducted via treatment plan optimization in FRoG and the RayStation TPS to compare SHArc therapy against reference plans using conventional techniques with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configurations for 3 clinical particle beams (protons [p], helium [4He], and carbon [12C] ions). Tests were performed on water-equivalent cylindrical phantoms for simple targets and clinical-like scenarios with an organ-at-risk in proximity of the target. Effective dose and dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETD) distributions for SHArc were evaluated against conventional planning techniques applying the modified microdosimetric kinetic model for considering bio-effect with (α/β)x = 2 Gy. A model for hypoxia-induced tumor radio-resistance was developed for particle therapy with dependence on oxygen concentration and particle species/energy (Zeff/β)2 to investigate the impact on effective dose. RESULTS SHArc plans exhibited similar target coverage with unique treatment attributes and distributions compared with conventional planning, with carbon ions demonstrating the greatest potential for tumor control and normal tissue sparing among the arc techniques. All SHArc plans exhibited a low-dose bath outside the target volume with a reduced maximum dose in normal tissues compared with single, parallel-opposed, and 3-field configuration plans. Moreover, favorable LETD distributions were made possible using the SHArc approach, with maximum LETD in the r = 5 mm tumor core (~8 keVμm-1, ~30 keVμm-1, and ~150 keVμm-1 for p, 4He, and 12C ions, respectively) and reductions of high-LET regions in normal tissues and organs-at-risk compared with static treatment beam delivery. CONCLUSION SHArc therapy offers potential treatment benefits such as increased normal tissue sparing. Without explicit consideration of oxygen concentration during treatment planning and optimization, SHArc-C may mitigate tumor hypoxia-induced loss of efficacy. Findings justify further development of robust SHArc treatment planning toward potential clinical translation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stewart Mein
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Tessonnier
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Benedikt Kopp
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Semi Harrabi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jürgen Debus
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- Faculty of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
- National Centre of Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Medical Physics, Pavia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ebner DK, Frank SJ, Inaniwa T, Yamada S, Shirai T. The Emerging Potential of Multi-Ion Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:624786. [PMID: 33692957 PMCID: PMC7937868 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.624786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Research into high linear energy transfer (LET) radiotherapy now spans over half a century, beginning with helium and deuteron treatment in 1952 and today ranging from fast neutrons to carbon-ions. Owing to pioneering work initially in the United States and thereafter in Germany and Japan, increasing focus is on the carbon-ion beam: 12 centers are in operation, with five under construction and three in planning. While the carbon-ion beam has demonstrated unique and promising suitability in laboratory and clinical trials toward the hypofractionated treatment of hypoxic and/or radioresistant cancer, substantial developmental potential remains. Perhaps most notable is the ability to paint LET in a tumor, theoretically better focusing damage delivery within the most resistant areas. However, the technique may be limited in practice by the physical properties of the beams themselves. A heavy-ion synchrotron may provide irradiation with multiple heavy-ions: carbon, helium, and oxygen are prime candidates. Each ion varies in LET distribution, and so a methodology combining the use of multiple ions into a uniform LET distribution within a tumor may allow for even greater treatment potential in radioresistant cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel K Ebner
- National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS), National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Steven J Frank
- Division of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Taku Inaniwa
- National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS), National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Shigeru Yamada
- National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS), National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Shirai
- National Institute of Radiological Science (NIRS), National Institutes of Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST), Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Dahle TJ, Rusten E, Stokkevåg CH, Silvoniemi A, Mairani A, Fjæra LF, Rørvik E, Henjum H, Wright P, Boer CG, Forsback S, Minn H, Malinen E, Ytre-Hauge KS. The FLUKA Monte Carlo code coupled with an OER model for biologically weighted dose calculations in proton therapy of hypoxic tumors. Phys Med 2020; 76:166-172. [PMID: 32683269 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2019] [Revised: 05/25/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increased radioresistance of hypoxic cells compared to well-oxygenated cells is quantified by the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In this study we created a FLUKA Monte Carlo based tool for inclusion of both OER and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in biologically weighted dose (ROWD) calculations in proton therapy and applied this to explore the impact of hypoxia. METHODS The RBE-weighted dose was adapted for hypoxia by making RBE model parameters dependent on the OER, in addition to the linear energy transfer (LET). The OER depends on the partial oxygen pressure (pO2) and LET. To demonstrate model performance, calculations were done with spread-out Bragg peaks (SOBP) in water phantoms with pO2 ranging from strongly hypoxic to normoxic (0.01-30 mmHg) and with a head and neck cancer proton plan optimized with an RBE of 1.1 and pO2 estimated voxel-by-voxel using [18F]-EF5 PET. An RBE of 1.1 and the Rørvik RBE model were used for the ROWD calculations. RESULTS The SOBP in water had decreasing ROWD with decreasing pO2. In the plans accounting for oxygenation, the median target doses were approximately a factor 1.1 lower than the corresponding plans which did not consider the OER. Hypoxia adapted target ROWDs were considerably more heterogeneous than the RBE1.1-weighted doses. CONCLUSION We realized a Monte Carlo based tool for calculating the ROWD. Read-in of patient pO2 and estimation of ROWD with flexibility in choice of RBE model was achieved, giving a tool that may be useful in future clinical applications of hypoxia-guided particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tordis Johnsen Dahle
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway.
| | - Espen Rusten
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Camilla Hanquist Stokkevåg
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Antti Silvoniemi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica (CNAO Foundation), Str. Campeggi, 53, 27100 Pavia, Italy; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lars Fredrik Fjæra
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Eivind Rørvik
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Allégaten 55, 5007 Bergen, Norway
| | - Pauliina Wright
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Department of Medical Physics, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Camilla Grindeland Boer
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Lies vei 65, 5021 Bergen, Norway
| | - Sarita Forsback
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Heikki Minn
- Turku PET Centre, University of Turku, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland; Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, P.O. Box 52, 20521 Turku, Finland
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Physics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1048 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway; Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4953 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matsuya Y, Sato T, Nakamura R, Naijo S, Date H. A theoretical cell-killing model to evaluate oxygen enhancement ratios at DNA damage and cell survival endpoints in radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:095006. [PMID: 32135526 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab7d14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Radio-resistance induced under low oxygen pressure plays an important role in malignant progression in fractionated radiotherapy. For the general approach to predict cell killing under hypoxia, cell-killing models (e.g. the Linear-Quadratic model) have to be fitted to in vitro experimental survival data for both normoxia and hypoxia to obtain the oxygen enhancement ratio (OER). In such a case, model parameters for every oxygen condition needs to be considered by model-fitting approaches. This is inefficient for fractionated irradiation planning. Here, we present an efficient model for fractionated radiotherapy the integrated microdosimetric-kinetic model including cell-cycle distribution and the OER at DNA double-strand break endpoint (OERDSB). The cell survival curves described by this model can reproduce the in vitro experimental survival data for both acute and chronic low oxygen concentrations. The OERDSB used for calculating cell survival agrees well with experimental DSB ratio of normoxia to hypoxia. The important parameters of the model are oxygen pressure and cell-cycle distribution, which enables us to predict cell survival probabilities under chronic hypoxia and chronic anoxia. This work provides biological effective dose (BED) under various oxygen conditions including its uncertainty, which can contribute to creating fractionated regimens for multi-fractionated radiotherapy. If the oxygen concentration in a tumor can be quantified by medical imaging, the present model will make it possible to estimate the cell-killing and BED under hypoxia in more realistic intravital situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matsuya
- Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Research Group for Radiation Transport Analysis, 2-4 Shirakata, Tokai, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan. Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Kita-12 Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaiddo 060-0812, Japan
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Margis S, Magouni M, Kyriakou I, Georgakilas AG, Incerti S, Emfietzoglou D. Microdosimetric calculations of the direct DNA damage induced by low energy electrons using the Geant4-DNA Monte Carlo code. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:045007. [PMID: 31935692 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab6b47] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
To calculate the yield of direct DNA damage induced by low energy electrons using Monte Carlo generated microdosimetric spectra at the nanometer scale and examine the influence of various simulation inputs. The potential of classical microdosimetry to offer a viable and simpler alternative to more elaborate mechanistic approaches for practical applications is discussed. Track-structure simulations with the Geant4-DNA low-energy extension of the Geant4 Monte Carlo toolkit were used for calculating lineal energy spectra in spherical volumes with dimensions relevant to double-strand-break (DSB) induction. The microdosimetric spectra were then used to calculate the yield of simple and clustered DSB based on literature values of the threshold energy of DNA damage. The influence of the different implementations of the dielectric function of liquid water available in Geant4-DNA (Option 2 and Option 4 constructors), as well as the effect of particle tracking cutoff energy and target size are examined. Frequency- and dose-mean lineal energies in liquid-water spheres of 2, 2.3, 2.6, and 3.4 nm diameter, as well as, number of simple and clustered DSB/Gy/cell are presented for electrons over the 100 eV to 100 keV energy range. Results are presented for both the 'default' (Option 2) and 'Ioannina' (Option 4) physics models of Geant4-DNA applying several commonly used tracking cutoff energies (10, 20, 50, 100 eV). Overall, the choice of the physics model and target diameter has a moderate effect (up to ~10%-30%) on the DSB yield whereas the effect of the tracking cutoff energy may be significant (>100%). Importantly, the yield of both simple and clustered DSB was found to vary significantly (by a factor of 2 or more) with electron energy over the examined range. The yields of electron-induced simple and clustered DSB exhibit a strong energy dependence over the 100 eV-100 keV range with implications to radiation quality issues. It is shown that a classical microdosimetry approach for the calculation of DNA damage based on lineal energy spectra in nanometer-size targets predicts comparable results to computationally intensive mechanistic approaches which use detailed atomistic DNA geometries, thus, offering a relatively simple and robust alternative for some practical applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanos Margis
- Medical Physics Laboratory, University of Ioannina Medical School, 45110 Ioannina, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Fossati P, Matsufuji N, Kamada T, Karger CP. Radiobiological issues in prospective carbon ion therapy trials. Med Phys 2018; 45:e1096-e1110. [PMID: 30421806 DOI: 10.1002/mp.12506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2016] [Revised: 05/29/2017] [Accepted: 07/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is developing toward a versatile tool in radiotherapy; however, the increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ions in tumors and normal tissues with respect to photon irradiation has to be considered by mathematical models in treatment planning. As a consequence, dose prescription and definition of dose constraints are performed in terms of RBE weighted rather than absorbed dose. The RBE is a complex quantity, which depends on physical variables, such as dose and beam quality as well as on normal tissue- or tumor-specific factors. At present, three RBE models are employed in CIRT: (a) the mixed-beam model, (b) the Microdosimetric Kinetic Model (MKM), and (c) the local effect model. While the LEM is used in Europe, the other two models are employed in Japan, and unfortunately, the concepts of how the nominal RBE-weighted dose is determined and prescribed differ significantly between the European and Japanese centers complicating the comparison, transfer, and reproduction of clinical results. This has severe impact on the way treatments should be prescribed, recorded, and reported. This contribution reviews the concept of the clinical application of the different RBE models and the ongoing clinical CIRT trials in Japan and Europe. Limitations of the RBE models and the resulting radiobiological issues in clinical CIRT trials are discussed in the context of current clinical evidence and future challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Fossati
- Fondazione CNAO (Centro Nazionale di Adroterapia Oncologica), Pavia, Italy.,European Institute of Oncology, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Tadashi Kamada
- National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Christian P Karger
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dahle TJ, Magro G, Ytre-Hauge KS, Stokkevåg CH, Choi K, Mairani A. Sensitivity study of the microdosimetric kinetic model parameters for carbon ion radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:225016. [PMID: 30418940 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae8b4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
In carbon ion therapy treatment planning, the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is accounted for by optimization of the RBE-weighted dose (biological dose). The RBE calculation methods currently applied clinically in carbon ion therapy are derived from the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM) in Japan and the local effect model (LEM) in Europe. The input parameters of these models are based on fit to experimental data subjected to uncertainties. We therefore performed a sensitivity study of the MKM input parameters, i.e. the domain radius (r d ), the nucleus radius (R n ) and the parameters of the linear quadratic (LQ) model (α x and β). The study was performed with the FLUKA Monte Carlo code, using spread out Bragg peak (SOBP) scenarios in water and a biological dose distribution in a clinical patient case. Comparisons were done between biological doses estimated applying the MKM with parameters based on HSG cells, and with HSG parameters varied separately by ±{5, 25, 50}%. Comparisons were also done between parameter sets from different cell lines (HSG, V79, CHO and T1), as well as versions of the LEM. Of the parameters, r d had the largest impact on the biological dose distribution, especially on the absolute dose values. Increasing this parameter by 25% decreased the biological dose level at the center of a 3 Gy(RBE) SOBP by 14%. Variations in R n only influenced the biological dose distribution towards the particle range, and variations in α x resulted in minor changes in the biological dose, with an increasing impact towards the particle range. β had the overall smallest influence on the SOBPs, but the impact could become more pronounced if alternative (LET dependent) implementations are used. The resulting percentage change in the SOBPs was generally less than the percentage change in the parameters. The patient case showed similar effects as with the SOBPs in water, and parameter variations had similar impact on the biological dose when using the clinical MKM and the general MKM. The clinical LEM calculated the highest biological doses to both tumor and surrounding healthy tissues, with a median target dose (D 50%) of 40.5 Gy(RBE), while the MKM with HSG and V79 parameters resulted in a D 50% of 34.2 and 36.9 Gy(RBE), respectively. In all, the observed change in biological dose distribution due to parameter variations demonstrates the importance of accurate input parameters when applying the MKM in treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Dahle
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, NO-5020 Bergen, Norway
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Matsuya Y, McMahon SJ, Tsutsumi K, Sasaki K, Okuyama G, Yoshii Y, Mori R, Oikawa J, Prise KM, Date H. Investigation of dose-rate effects and cell-cycle distribution under protracted exposure to ionizing radiation for various dose-rates. Sci Rep 2018; 8:8287. [PMID: 29844494 PMCID: PMC5974424 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26556-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
During exposure to ionizing radiation, sub-lethal damage repair (SLDR) competes with DNA damage induction in cultured cells. By virtue of SLDR, cell survival increases with decrease of dose-rate, so-called dose-rate effects (DREs). Here, we focused on a wide dose-rate range and investigated the change of cell-cycle distribution during X-ray protracted exposure and dose-response curves via hybrid analysis with a combination of in vitro experiments and mathematical modelling. In the course of flow-cytometric cell-cycle analysis and clonogenic assays, we found the following responses in CHO-K1 cells: (1) The fraction of cells in S phase gradually increases during 6 h exposure at 3.0 Gy/h, which leads to radio-resistance. (2) Slight cell accumulation in S and G2/M phases is observed after exposure at 6.0 Gy/h for more than 10 hours. This suggests that an increase of SLDR rate for cells in S phase during irradiation may be a reproducible factor to describe changes in the dose-response curve at dose-rates of 3.0 and 6.0 Gy/h. By re-evaluating cell survival for various dose-rates of 0.186-60.0 Gy/h considering experimental-based DNA content and SLDR, it is suggested that the change of S phase fraction during irradiation modulates the dose-response curve and is possibly responsible for some inverse DREs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matsuya
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Kaori Tsutsumi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Kohei Sasaki
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan
| | - Go Okuyama
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan
| | - Yuji Yoshii
- Biological Research, Education and Instrumentation Center, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Mori
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Joma Oikawa
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Kevin M Prise
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Hiroyuki Date
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Matsuya Y, McMahon SJ, Tsutsumi K, Sasaki K, Okuyama G, Yoshii Y, Mori R, Oikawa J, Prise KM, Date H. Investigation of dose-rate effects and cell-cycle distribution under protracted exposure to ionizing radiation for various dose-rates. Sci Rep 2018. [PMID: 29844494 DOI: 10.1038/s41598a018-26556a5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023] Open
Abstract
During exposure to ionizing radiation, sub-lethal damage repair (SLDR) competes with DNA damage induction in cultured cells. By virtue of SLDR, cell survival increases with decrease of dose-rate, so-called dose-rate effects (DREs). Here, we focused on a wide dose-rate range and investigated the change of cell-cycle distribution during X-ray protracted exposure and dose-response curves via hybrid analysis with a combination of in vitro experiments and mathematical modelling. In the course of flow-cytometric cell-cycle analysis and clonogenic assays, we found the following responses in CHO-K1 cells: (1) The fraction of cells in S phase gradually increases during 6 h exposure at 3.0 Gy/h, which leads to radio-resistance. (2) Slight cell accumulation in S and G2/M phases is observed after exposure at 6.0 Gy/h for more than 10 hours. This suggests that an increase of SLDR rate for cells in S phase during irradiation may be a reproducible factor to describe changes in the dose-response curve at dose-rates of 3.0 and 6.0 Gy/h. By re-evaluating cell survival for various dose-rates of 0.186-60.0 Gy/h considering experimental-based DNA content and SLDR, it is suggested that the change of S phase fraction during irradiation modulates the dose-response curve and is possibly responsible for some inverse DREs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Matsuya
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Kaori Tsutsumi
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Kohei Sasaki
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan
| | - Go Okuyama
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University of Science, Sapporo, 006-8585, Japan
| | - Yuji Yoshii
- Biological Research, Education and Instrumentation Center, Sapporo Medical University, Sapporo, 060-8556, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Mori
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Joma Oikawa
- Graduate School of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan
| | - Kevin M Prise
- Centre for Cancer Research & Cell Biology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, BT9 7AE, UK
| | - Hiroyuki Date
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, 060-0812, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Manganaro L, Russo G, Bourhaleb F, Fausti F, Giordanengo S, Monaco V, Sacchi R, Vignati A, Cirio R, Attili A. 'Survival': a simulation toolkit introducing a modular approach for radiobiological evaluations in ion beam therapy. Phys Med Biol 2018. [PMID: 29537391 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aab697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
One major rationale for the application of heavy ion beams in tumour therapy is their increased relative biological effectiveness (RBE). The complex dependencies of the RBE on dose, biological endpoint, position in the field etc require the use of biophysical models in treatment planning and clinical analysis. This study aims to introduce a new software, named 'Survival', to facilitate the radiobiological computations needed in ion therapy. The simulation toolkit was written in C++ and it was developed with a modular architecture in order to easily incorporate different radiobiological models. The following models were successfully implemented: the local effect model (LEM, version I, II and III) and variants of the microdosimetric-kinetic model (MKM). Different numerical evaluation approaches were also implemented: Monte Carlo (MC) numerical methods and a set of faster analytical approximations. Among the possible applications, the toolkit was used to reproduce the RBE versus LET for different ions (proton, He, C, O, Ne) and different cell lines (CHO, HSG). Intercomparison between different models (LEM and MKM) and computational approaches (MC and fast approximations) were performed. The developed software could represent an important tool for the evaluation of the biological effectiveness of charged particles in ion beam therapy, in particular when coupled with treatment simulations. Its modular architecture facilitates benchmarking and inter-comparison between different models and evaluation approaches. The code is open source (GPL2 license) and available at https://github.com/batuff/Survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Manganaro
- Physics Department, Università degli studi di Torino (UniTO), Torino, Italy. Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare (INFN) Sezione di Torino, Torino, Italy. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
A summary of the key aspects of radiobiological modelling is provided, based on the theoretical and practical concepts of the linear quadratic model, which gradually replaced other numerical approaches. The closely related biological effective dose concept is useful in many clinical applications. Biological effective dose formulations in conventional photon-based radiotherapy continue to be developed, and can be extended to the now increasingly used proton and ion-beam therapy, to very low or high dose ranges, the dose rate effect, hypoxia and repopulation. Such established and new research developments will be of interest to clinicians, physicists and biologists to better understand the processes underlying radiotherapy and assist their collaborative efforts to make radiotherapy safer and more effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B Jones
- Department of Oncology, CRUK-MRC Oxford Centre, Gray Laboratory, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - R G Dale
- Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Strigari L, Torriani F, Manganaro L, Inaniwa T, Dalmasso F, Cirio R, Attili A. Tumour control in ion beam radiotherapy with different ions in the presence of hypoxia: an oxygen enhancement ratio model based on the microdosimetric kinetic model. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:065012. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa89ae] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
20
|
Klein C, Dokic I, Mairani A, Mein S, Brons S, Häring P, Haberer T, Jäkel O, Zimmermann A, Zenke F, Blaukat A, Debus J, Abdollahi A. Overcoming hypoxia-induced tumor radioresistance in non-small cell lung cancer by targeting DNA-dependent protein kinase in combination with carbon ion irradiation. Radiat Oncol 2017; 12:208. [PMID: 29287602 PMCID: PMC5747947 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-017-0939-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Hypoxia-induced radioresistance constitutes a major obstacle for a curative treatment of cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate effects of photon and carbon ion irradiation in combination with inhibitors of DNA-Damage Response (DDR) on tumor cell radiosensitivity under hypoxic conditions. Methods Human non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) models, A549 and H1437, were irradiated with dose series of photon and carbon ions under hypoxia (1% O2) vs. normoxic conditions (21% O2). Clonogenic survival was studied after dual combinations of radiotherapy with inhibitors of DNA-dependent Protein Kinase (DNAPKi, M3814) and ATM serine/threonine kinase (ATMi). Results The OER at 30% survival for photon irradiation of A549 cells was 1.4. The maximal oxygen effect measured as survival ratio was 2.34 at 8 Gy photon irradiation of A549 cells. In contrast, no significant oxygen effect was found after carbon ion irradiation. Accordingly, the relative effect of 6 Gy carbon ions was determined as 3.8 under normoxia and. 4.11 under hypoxia. ATM and DNA-PK inhibitors dose dependently sensitized tumor cells for both radiation qualities. For 100 nM DNAPKi the survival ratio at 4 Gy more than doubled from 1.59 under normoxia to 3.3 under hypoxia revealing a strong radiosensitizing effect under hypoxic conditions. In contrast, this ratio only moderately increased after photon irradiation and ATMi under hypoxia. The most effective treatment was combined carbon ion irradiation and DNA damage repair inhibition. Conclusions Carbon ions efficiently eradicate hypoxic tumor cells. Both, ATMi and DNAPKi elicit radiosensitizing effects. DNAPKi preferentially sensitizes hypoxic cells to radiotherapy. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13014-017-0939-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Klein
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andrea Mairani
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Stewart Mein
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Medical Physics in Radiation Therapy, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Haberer
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Jürgen Debus
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Amir Abdollahi
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Heidelberg, Germany. .,Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen Y, Li J, Li C, Qiu R, Wu Z. A modified microdosimetric kinetic model for relative biological effectiveness calculation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017; 63:015008. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa9a68] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
22
|
Inaniwa T, Kanematsu N, Noda K, Kamada T. Treatment planning of intensity modulated composite particle therapy with dose and linear energy transfer optimization. Phys Med Biol 2017; 62:5180-5197. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa68d7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
|