Mutation induction and neoplastic transformation in human and human-hamster hybrid cells: dependence on photon energy and modulation in the low-dose range

An empirical method for deriving RBE values associated with electrons, photons and radionuclides

There is substantial evidence to justify using relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values of >1 for low-energy electrons and photons. But, in the field of radiation protection, radiation associated with low linear energy transfer has been assigned a radiation weighting factor wR of 1. This value may be suitable for radiation protection but, for risk considerations, it is important to evaluate the potential elevated biological effectiveness of radiation to improve the quality of risk estimates. RBE values between 2 and 3 for tritium are implied by several experimental measurements. Additionally, elevated RBE values have been found for other similar low-energy radiation sources. In this work, RBE values are derived for electrons based upon the fractional deposition of absorbed dose of energies less than a few kiloelectron volts. Using this empirical method, RBE values were also derived for monoenergetic photons and 1070 radionuclides from ICRP Publication 107 for which photons and electrons are the primary emissions.

p53 Ser15 phosphorylation and histone modifications contribute to IR-induced miR-34a transcription in mammary epithelial cells

Previous studies have demonstrated that miR-34a is a direct transcriptional target of tumor suppressor p53 and plays a crucial role in p53-mediated biological processes, such as cell cycle arrest, apoptosis and senescence. However, the role of p53 phosphorylation at Ser15 and histone modifications in ionizing radiation (IR)-induced miR-34a transcription in human mammary epithelial cells remains unknown. The present study showed that IR triggers miR-34a induction in rat mammary gland tissue and human mammary epithelial cells in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Gene copy number and CpG methylation exhibit no effect on IR-inducible miR-34a expression, while the levels of phosphorylated p53 at Ser15 are markedly elevated in human mammary epithelial cells 96 h post-IR, which correlates with IR-inducible miR-34a transcription and the p38 MAPK pathway. Conversely, suppression of p38 MAPK with SB239063 inhibits IR-induced p53 phosphorylation at Ser15 and miR-34a expression in a dose-dependent manner. Our study found that wild-type p53 is enriched at miR-34a promoter, and luciferase activity of miR-34a promoter reporter is attenuated by either mutant p53 (Ser15Ala) or mutant miR-34a promoter. Furthermore, IR also triggers phosphorylation, tri-methylation and acetylation of histone H3 and acetylation of histone H4, which correlates with IR-inducible miR-34a transcription, while SAHA potentiates IR-inducible miR-34a expression. Moreover, acetyl-histone H3 is significantly enriched at miR-34a promoter in IR-exposed HMEC cells. Yet, we show that there is no correlation between IR-inducible miR-34a expression and IR-induced rapid and transient G 2/M arrest. In sum, our novel data for the first time demonstrate that IR-induced p53 Ser15 phosphorylation via p38 MAPK is essential for its functional regulation of IR-inducible miR-34a transcription in human mammary epithelial cells, and that histone modifications may also play a key role in IR-inducible miR-34a expression.

DNA double-strand breaks as potential indicators for the biological effects of ionising radiation exposure from cardiac CT and conventional coronary angiography: a randomised, controlled study

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively compare induced DNA double-strand breaks by cardiac computed tomography (CT) and conventional coronary angiography (CCA).

METHODS

56 patients with suspected coronary artery disease were randomised to undergo either CCA or cardiac CT. DNA double-strand breaks were assessed in fluorescence microscopy of blood lymphocytes as indicators of the biological effects of radiation exposure. Radiation doses were estimated using dose-length product (DLP) and dose-area product (DAP) with conversion factors for CT and CCA, respectively.

RESULTS

On average there were 0.12 ± 0.06 induced double-strand breaks per lymphocyte for CT and 0.29 ± 0.18 for diagnostic CCA (P < 0.001). This relative biological effect of ionising radiation from CCA was 1.9 times higher (P < 0.001) than the effective dose estimated by conversion factors would have suggested. The correlation between the biological effects and the estimated radiation doses was excellent for CT (r = 0.951, P < 0.001) and moderate to good for CCA (r = 0.862, P < 0.001). One day after radiation, a complete repair of double-strand breaks to background levels was found in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Conversion factors may underestimate the relative biological effects of ionising radiation from CCA. DNA double-strand break assessment may provide a strategy for individualised assessments of radiation.

KEY POINTS

• Radiation dose causes concern for both conventional coronary angiography and cardiac CT. • Estimations of the biological effects of ionising radiation may become feasible. • Fewer DNA double-strand breaks are induced by cardiac CT than CCA. • Conversion factors may underestimate the relative effects of ionising radiation from CCA.

Mammography-oncogenecity at low doses

Controversy exists regarding the biological effectiveness of low energy x-rays used for mammography breast screening. Recent radiobiology studies have provided compelling evidence that these low energy x-rays may be 4.42 +/- 2.02 times more effective in causing mutational damage than higher energy x-rays. These data include a study involving in vitro irradiation of a human cell line using a mammography x-ray source and a high energy source which matches the spectrum of radiation observed in survivors from the Hiroshima atomic bomb. Current radiation risk estimates rely heavily on data from the atomic bomb survivors, and a direct comparison between the diagnostic energies used in the UK breast screening programme and those used for risk estimates can now be made. Evidence highlighting the increase in relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of mammography x-rays to a range of x-ray energies implies that the risks of radiation-induced breast cancers for mammography x-rays are potentially underestimated by a factor of four. A pooled analysis of three measurements gives a maximal RBE (for malignant transformation of human cells in vitro) of 4.02 +/- 0.72 for 29 kVp (peak accelerating voltage) x-rays compared to high energy electrons and higher energy x-rays. For the majority of women in the UK NHS breast screening programme, it is shown that the benefit safely exceeds the risk of possible cancer induction even when this higher biological effectiveness factor is applied. The risk/benefit analysis, however, implies the need for caution for women screened under the age of 50, and particularly for those with a family history (and therefore a likely genetic susceptibility) of breast cancer. In vitro radiobiological data are generally acquired at high doses, and there are different extrapolation mechanisms to the low doses seen clinically. Recent low dose in vitro data have indicated a potential suppressive effect at very low dose rates and doses. Whilst mammography is a low dose exposure, it is not a low dose rate examination, and protraction of dose should not be confused with fractionation. Although there is potential for a suppressive effect at low doses, recent epidemiological data, and several international radiation risk assessments, continue to promote the linear no-threshold (LNT) model. Finally, recent studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is more sensitive than mammography in detecting invasive breast cancer in women with a genetic sensitivity. Since an increase in the risk associated with mammographic screening would blur the justification of exposure for this high risk subgroup, the use of other (non-ionising) screening modalities is preferable.

DNA Double-Strand Break Misrejoining after Exposure of Primary Human Fibroblasts to CKCharacteristic X Rays, 29 kVp X Rays and60Co γ Rays

The efficiency of ionizing photon radiation for inducing mutations, chromosome aberrations, neoplastic cell transformation, and cell killing depends on the photon energy. We investigated the induction and rejoining of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) as possible contributors for the varying efficiencies of different photon energies. A specialized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis assay based on Southern hybridization of single Mbp genomic restriction fragments was employed to assess DSB induction and rejoining by quantifying the restriction fragment band. Unrejoined and misrejoined DSBs were determined in dose fractionation protocols using doses per fraction of 2.2 and 4.4 Gy for CK characteristic X rays, 4 and 8 Gy for 29 kVp X rays, and 5, 10 and 20 Gy for 60Co gamma rays. DSB induction by CK characteristic X rays was about twofold higher than for 60Co gamma rays, whereas 29 kVp X rays showed only marginally elevated levels of induced DSBs compared with 60Co gamma rays (a factor of 1.15). Compared with these modest variations in DSB induction, the variations in the levels of unrejoined and misrejoined DSBs were more significant. Our results suggest that differences in the fidelity of DSB rejoining together with the different efficiencies for induction of DSBs can explain the varying biological effectiveness of different photon energies.

The neoplastic transformation potential of mammography X rays and atomic bomb spectrum radiation

Considerable controversy currently exists regarding the biological effectiveness of 29 kVp X rays which are used for mammography screening. This issue must be resolved to enable proper evaluation of radiation risks from breast screening. Here a definitive assessment of the biological effectiveness of 29 kVp X rays compared to the quality of radiation to which the atomic bomb survivors were exposed is presented for the first time. The standard radiation sources used were (a) an atomic bomb simulation spectrum and (b) 2.2 MeV electrons from a strontium-90/yttrium-90 (90Sr/90Y) radioactive source. The biological end point used was neoplastic transformation in vitro in CGL1 (HeLa x human fibroblast hybrid) cells. No significant difference was observed for the biological effectiveness of the two high-energy sources for neoplastic transformation. A limiting relative biological effectiveness (RBE(M)) of 4.42 +/- 2.02 was observed for neoplastic transformation by 29 kVp X rays compared to these two sources. This compares with values of 4.67 +/- 3.93 calculated from previously published data and 3.58 +/- 1.77 when the reference radiation was 200 and 220 kVp X rays. This suggests that the risks associated with mammography screening may be approximately five times higher than previously assumed and that the risk-benefit relationship of mammography exposures may need to be re-examined.

The Maximum Low-Dose RBE of 17.4 and 40 keV Monochromatic X Rays for the Induction of Dicentric Chromosomes in Human Peripheral Lymphocytes

Schmid et al. recently reported on the maximum low-dose RBE for mammography X rays (29 kV) for the induction of dicentrics in human lymphocytes. To obtain additional information on the RBE for this radiation quality, experiments with monochromatized synchrotron radiation were performed. Monochromatic 17.4 keV X rays were chosen for comparison with the diagnostic mammography X-ray spectrum to evaluate the spectral influence, while monochromatic 40 keV X rays represent a higher-energy reference radiation, within the experiment. The induction of dicentric chromosomes in human lymphocytes from one blood donor irradiated in vitro with 17.4 keV and 40 keV monochromatic X rays resulted in alpha coefficients of (3.44 +/- 0.87) x 10(-2) Gy(-1) and (2.37 +/- 0.93) x 10(-2) Gy(-1), respectively. These biological effects are only about half of the alpha coefficients reported earlier for exposure of blood from the same donor with the broad energy spectra of 29 kV X rays (mean energy of 17.4 keV) and 60 kV X rays (mean energy of 48 keV). A similar behavior is evident in terms of RBEM. Relative to weakly filtered 220 kV X rays, the RBEM for 17.4 and 40 keV monochromatic X rays is 0.86 +/- 0.23 and 0.59 +/- 0.24, respectively, which is in contrast to the RBEM of 1.64 +/- 0.27 for 29 kV X rays and 1.10 +/- 0.19 for 60 kV X rays. It is evident that the monochromatic radiations are less effective in inducing dicentric chromosomes than broad-spectrum X rays with the corresponding mean energy value. Therefore, it can be assumed that, for these X-ray qualities with broad energy spectra, a large fraction of the effects should be attributed predominantly to photons with energies well below the mean energy.