Detailed exploration of the endothelium: parameterization of flow-mediated dilation through principal component analysis

Noninvasive assessment of endothelial function in clinical practice

In the fight against cardiovascular diseases, preventive strategies are becoming the focus of attention. One of these strategies proposes to identify individuals who are at a high risk of developing cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction could improve patient risk stratification and the implementation of preventive strategies. In this review we focus on noninvasive techniques that have recently become available to assess endothelial function: flow-mediated vasodilation as measured by ultrasound of the brachial artery, pulse wave analysis, and finger plethysmography during postischemic hyperemia. We describe the basic principles, the main protocols to perform these techniques, and their clinical value based on the scientific evidence.

Association of endothelial function and vascular data with LDL-c and HDL-c in a homogeneous population of middle-aged, healthy military men: Evidence for a critical role of optimal lipid levels

BACKGROUND

Modifying lipids levels underpins atherosclerosis prevention. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) could advise which patients to treat and to what extent. Little is known about the influence of near-normal lipid levels on the endothelium and the mechanisms related to different lipid fractions. We studied associations between FMD and lipids, focusing on normal lipid levels.

METHODS

An age-homogeneous sample of 171 healthy, untreated military men (mean age 35.5+/-1.1 years) was studied: serum lipid determination and brachial artery ultrasound with a forearm ischemia cuff and automated measurement were performed. NCEP-ATP III groups were used.

RESULTS

Significantly smaller vessel diameters were found among individuals with high HDL-c (4.10 mm vs. 4.24 mm), optimal LDL-c (4.00 mm vs. 4.22 mm), and normal triglycerides (<150 mg/dl) (4.15 mm vs. 4.31 mm). Basal diameter correlated significantly with HDL-c and triglycerides. There were significant differences in FMD between low HDL-c compared to the rest (4.13% vs. 5.07%) and between optimal and near-optimal LDL-c compared to the rest (5.28% vs. 4.56%). HDL-c and LDL-c correlated with FMD. The inverse relation of high LDL-c and FMD is partially due to a decreased stimulus. Besides, stimulus heterogeneity may mask HDL-c link with FMD.

CONCLUSION

Those subjects naturally (not pharmacologically) in the healthy tail-end of the lipid distributions have the best endothelial function and smaller vessels. Functional vascular remodeling might precede anatomical remodeling and, in early stages, vessel size should be considered a risk indicator rather than an atherosclerotic sign. Furthermore, controlling the stimulus seems necessary for detecting the relationship between HDL-c and FMD, and should be performed regularly.