An audit of published South African diagnostic reference level data

Evaluation of patients' radiation doses and establishment of institutional diagnostic reference levels in nuclear medicine in Oman

This study aimed to develop diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography/Computed Tomography (SPECT/CT) and Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) imaging for the most frequent SPECT/CT and PET/CT examinations performed at our institution. A total of 1134 adult patients, who have undergone SPECT/CT and PET/CT scanning over a period of 4 years (2018-2021), were included. The scans consisted of 401 PET/CT and 733 SPECT/CT scans. The CT dosimetry data [CT-dose-index (CTDIvol), dose-length-product (DLP)] and administered activities were collected. The DRLs were calculated for CTDIvol, DLP and administrated activity. The estimated DRLs are given as [median CTDIvol (mGy):median DLP (mGy.cm):median administrated activity (MBq)]: whole body PET/CT: 1.88:175:259; brain PET/CT: 12.9:300:239; cardiac PET/CT: 1.34:32:368; bone SPECT/CT: 2.68:116:763; MPI SPECT/CT (stress-rest): 1.49:52:751-721; parathyroid SPECT/CT: 3.1:126:779; thyroid uptake SPECT: 3.52:147:195; thyroid post-ablation SPECT/CT: 3.85:160:NA. The derived DRLs have allowed careful monitoring of doses delivered to patients and could act as a trigger to investigate doses that systematically exceeds the derived DRLs.

Estimation of diagnostic reference levels for pediatric head computed tomography in Yaoundé

The diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are determined from dosimetry studies to compare and manage patient doses in medical imaging procedures. The aim of this work was to establish the first DRLs for pediatric patients during the most common computed tomography (CT) procedures in Yaoundé, Cameroon during routine head CT examinations to know how to improve our clinical practice tomorrow. The sample was classified per age group: ≤ 1-, 1-5-, 5-10- and 10-15-y-old. The retrospective study was used. The proposed DRLs were defined as 75th percentile of the median values of the distributions. In terms of Volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP), the DRLs obtained for the ages groups were: 28.6 mGy and 545.8 mGy.cm, 32.6 mGy and 735 mGy.cm, 37.1 mGy and 761.6 mGy.cm and 44.2 mGy and 1081.2 mGy.cm, respectively. DRLs in Yaoundé for DLP were higher than those of comparison literatures. The Yaoundé CTDIvol was higher than the comparison literatures except for the IAEA (2015) values for the three older age groups. The DRLs reported in Yaoundé were compared to Morocco 2020, Switzerland 2018, IAEA 2015 and Iran 2020 values. The estimation of this first DRL for pediatric head CT scan in Yaoundé must be a starting point to spread this investigation towards other examinations and imaging modalities across the country. Therefore, optimization of the CT scan procedures and orderly updates of local DRLs are necessary to improve radioprotection.

Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for CT colonography at a tertiary hospital

Background

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are an important metric in identifying abnormally high radiation doses in diagnostic examinations. National DRLs for CT colonography do not currently exist in South Africa, but there are efforts to collect data for a national DRL project.

Objectives

This study investigated radiation doses for CT colonography in adult patients at a large tertiary hospital in South Africa with the aim of setting local DRLs.

Method

Patient data from two CT scanners (Philips Ingenuity and Siemens Somatom go.Top) in the period March 2020 - March 2023 were obtained from the hospital's picture archiving and communication system (PACS) (n = 115). Analysis involved determining the median computed tomography dose index-volume (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) values. The findings were compared with DRLs established internationally.

Results

Ingenuity median CTDIvol was 20 mGy and DLP was 2169 mGy*cm; Somatom median CTDIvol was 6 mGy and DLP was 557 mGy*cm. Ingenuity exceeded the United Kingdom's (UK) recommended DRLs by 82% and 214%, respectively. Somatom median CTDIvol and DLP were 45% and 19% lower than UK NDRLs.

Conclusion

Somatom's tin filter and other dose reduction features provided significant dose reduction. These data were used to set DRLs for CT colonography at the hospital; CTDIvol: 6 mGy and DLP: 557 mGy*cm.

Contribution

In addition to informing radiation protection practices at the level of the institution, the established local DRLs contribute towards implementing regional and national DRLs.

Size based dependence of patient dose metrics, and image quality metrics for clinical indicator-based imaging protocols in abdominal CT procedures

INTRODUCTION

Diagnostic reference level (DRL) values for computed tomography (CT) based on clinical indication are warranted since imaging protocols are indication-dependent. This study proposes clinical DRL values using the CT dose metrics and five patient size-related parameters while considering image quality.

METHODS

The volumetric CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP) and five size-related parameters of size-specific dose estimates (SSDE), namely the anterior-posterior (AP) dimension, lateral (LAT) dimension, sum dimension, effective diameter, and the body mass index (BMI), were used to calculate DRL values for CT chest-abdomen-pelvis (CAP) and abdomen-pelvis (AbP) protocols. DRL values of the clinical indications for cancer, urinary system stones and other pathologies were assessed based on the BMI classifications using the median and 75th percentile. An image subtraction algorithm was used to assess the image quality metrics (IQM) of the CT images.

RESULTS

The 75th percentile for SSDEAP dimension for CAP cancer was 19.7, 14.9 and 12.7 mGy at Hospitals A, C and E, respectively. The median DLP for other AbP pathologies was 556.3, 1452.0 and 1960.7 mGy.cm for normal weight, overweight and obese patients, respectively, at Hospital A. The image quality varied among BMI classifications for different clinically indicated examinations. Although the dose increased with BMI, the image quality index was consistent because automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) was used.

CONCLUSION

DRL values are influenced by patient size-related parameters and the clinical indication protocols, while the image quality index is independent of the BMI.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Size-related clinical DRL values and image quality index can be used to monitor and optimise dose and image quality. Acquisition parameters and image quality indexes should be investigated and adjusted when unusually high DRL values are noted.

An audit of patient radiation doses in interventional radiology at a South African hospital

Background

Interventional radiology (IR) is becoming more relevant in patient care and is associated with increased patient radiation exposure and radiation-induced adverse effects. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are crucial for radiation control. There is a paucity of published DRLs for IR in South Africa and sub-Saharan Africa.

Objectives

This study aimed to determine local DRLs for fluoroscopically-guided IR procedures and compare the achieved DRLs with published local and international DRLs.

Method

Retrospective, descriptive, single-centre study. Kerma air product (KAP), reference point air kerma (K_a,r) and fluoroscopy time (FT) were collected for patients (12 years and older) who underwent IR procedures at a university hospital from 01 January 2019 to 31 December 2019. The 75th percentile of the distribution of each dose parameter (KAP, K_a,r and FT) per procedure was calculated and taken as the local diagnostic reference levels (LDRL). The established LDRLs were compared to published DRLs.

Results

A total of 564 cases were evaluated. The 13 most frequent procedures (with 15 or more cases) represented 86.1% (487/564). Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage was the most common procedure (n = 146, 25.9%). Diagnostic cerebral angiogram DRLs exceeded the published DRL data ranges for all parameters (DRL 209.3), and interventional cerebral angiogram exceeded published ranges (DRL 275). Uterine artery embolisation (UAE) exceeded these ranges for KAP and K_a,r. (KAP-954.9 Gy/cm², K_a,r-2640.8 mGy).

Conclusion

The LDRLs for diagnostic cerebral angiogram, interventional cerebral angiogram and UAE exceeded published international DRL ranges. These procedures require radiation optimisation as recommended by the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP).

Contribution

In addition to informing radiation protection practices at the level of the institution, the established LDRLs contribute towards Regional and National DRLs.