Optimization of volumetric breast density estimation in digital mammograms

Deep-learning-based projection-domain breast thickness estimation for shape-prior iterative image reconstruction in digital breast tomosynthesis

BACKGROUND

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a technique that can overcome the shortcomings of conventional X-ray mammography and can be effective for the early screening of breast cancer. The compression of the breast is essential during the DBT imaging. However, since the periphery of the breast cannot be compressed to a constant value, nonuniformity of thickness and in-plane shape variation happen. These cause inconvenience in diagnosis, scatter correction, and breast density estimation.

PURPOSE

In this study, we propose a deep-learning-based methodology for projection-domain breast thickness estimation and demonstrate a shape-prior iterative DBT image reconstruction.

METHODS

We prepared the Euclidean distance map, the thickness map, and the thickness corrected image of the simulated breast projections for thickness and shape estimation. Each pixel of the Euclidean distance map denotes a distance to the closest skin-line. The thickness map is defined as a conceptual projection of ideal breast support that differentiates the inner and outer regions of the breast phantom. The thickness projection map thus represents the x-ray path lengths of a homogeneous breast phantom. We generated the thickness corrected image by dividing the projection image by the thickness map in a pixel-wise manner. We developed a convolutional neural network for thickness estimation and correction. The network utilizes a projection image and a Euclidean distance image together as a dual input. An estimated breast thickness map is then used for constructing the breast shape mask by use of the discrete algebraic reconstruction technique (DART).

RESULTS

The proposed network effectively corrected the breast thickness in various simulation situations. Low normalized root-mean-squared error (NRMSE; 1.976%) and high structural similarity (SSIM; 99.997%) indicated a good agreement between the network-generated thickness corrected image and the ground-truth image. Compared to the existing methods and simple single-input network, the proposed method showed outperformance in breast thickness estimation and accordingly in breast shape recovery for various numerical phantoms without provoking any significant artifact. We have demonstrated that the uniformity of voxel value has improved by the inclusion of a shape-prior for the iterative DBT reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

We presented a novel deep-learning-based breast thickness correction and a shape reconstruction method. This approach to estimating the true thickness map and the shape of the breast undergoing compression can benefit various fields such as improvement of diagnostic breast images, scatter correction, material decomposition, and breast density estimation. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Algorithms and methods for computerized analysis of mammography images in breast cancer risk assessment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The computerized analysis of mammograms for the development of quantitative biomarkers is a growing field with applications in breast cancer risk assessment. Computerized image analysis offers the possibility of using different methods and algorithms to extract additional information from screening and diagnosis images to aid in the assessment of breast cancer risk. In this work, we review the algorithms and methods for the automated, computerized analysis of mammography images for the task mentioned, and discuss the main challenges that the development and improvement of these methods face today.

METHODS

We review the recent progress in two main branches of mammography-based risk assessment: parenchymal analysis and breast density estimation, including performance indicators of most of the studies considered. Parenchymal analysis methods are divided into feature-based methods and deep learning-based methods; breast density methods are grouped into area-based, volume-based, and breast categorization methods. Additionally, we identify the challenges that these study fields currently face.

RESULTS

Parenchymal analysis using deep learning algorithms are on the rise, with some studies showing high-performance indicators, such as an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of up to 90. Methods for risk assessment using breast density report a wider variety of performance indicators; however, we can also identify that the approaches using deep learning methods yield high performance in each of the subdivisions considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Both breast density estimation and parenchymal analysis are promising tools for the task of breast cancer risk assessment; deep learning methods have shown performance comparable or superior to the other considered methods. All methods considered face challenges such as the lack of objective comparison between them and the lack of access to datasets from different populations.

A Technical Review of Convolutional Neural Network-Based Mammographic Breast Cancer Diagnosis

This study reviews the technique of convolutional neural network (CNN) applied in a specific field of mammographic breast cancer diagnosis (MBCD). It aims to provide several clues on how to use CNN for related tasks. MBCD is a long-standing problem, and massive computer-aided diagnosis models have been proposed. The models of CNN-based MBCD can be broadly categorized into three groups. One is to design shallow or to modify existing models to decrease the time cost as well as the number of instances for training; another is to make the best use of a pretrained CNN by transfer learning and fine-tuning; the third is to take advantage of CNN models for feature extraction, and the differentiation of malignant lesions from benign ones is fulfilled by using machine learning classifiers. This study enrolls peer-reviewed journal publications and presents technical details and pros and cons of each model. Furthermore, the findings, challenges and limitations are summarized and some clues on the future work are also given. Conclusively, CNN-based MBCD is at its early stage, and there is still a long way ahead in achieving the ultimate goal of using deep learning tools to facilitate clinical practice. This review benefits scientific researchers, industrial engineers, and those who are devoted to intelligent cancer diagnosis.

Comparison of subjective and fully automated methods for measuring mammographic density

Background Breast radiologists of the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program subjectively classified mammographic density using a three-point scale between 1996 and 2012 and changed into the fourth edition of the BI-RADS classification since 2013. In 2015, an automated volumetric breast density assessment software was installed at two screening units. Purpose To compare volumetric breast density measurements from the automated method with two subjective methods: the three-point scale and the BI-RADS density classification. Material and Methods Information on subjective and automated density assessment was obtained from screening examinations of 3635 women recalled for further assessment due to positive screening mammography between 2007 and 2015. The score of the three-point scale (I = fatty; II = medium dense; III = dense) was available for 2310 women. The BI-RADS density score was provided for 1325 women. Mean volumetric breast density was estimated for each category of the subjective classifications. The automated software assigned volumetric breast density to four categories. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was assessed using weighted kappa (k_w). Results Mean volumetric breast density was 4.5%, 7.5%, and 13.4% for categories I, II, and III of the three-point scale, respectively, and 4.4%, 7.5%, 9.9%, and 13.9% for the BI-RADS density categories, respectively ( P for trend < 0.001 for both subjective classifications). The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was k_w = 0.5 (95% CI = 0.47-0.53; P < 0.001). Conclusion Mean values of volumetric breast density increased with increasing density category of the subjective classifications. The agreement between BI-RADS and volumetric breast density categories was moderate.

Breast density: why all the fuss?

The term "breast density" or mammographic density (MD) denotes those components of breast parenchyma visualised at mammography that are denser than adipose tissue. MD is composed of a mixture of epithelial and stromal components, notably collagen, in variable proportions. MD is most commonly assessed in clinical practice with the time-honoured method of visual estimation of area-based percent density (PMD) on a mammogram, with categorisation into quartiles. The computerised semi-automated thresholding method, Cumulus, also yielding area-based percent density, is widely used for research purposes; however, the advent of fully automated volumetric methods developed as a consequence of the widespread use of digital mammography (DM) and yielding both absolute and percent dense volumes, has resulted in an explosion of interest in MD recently. Broadly, the importance of MD is twofold: firstly, the presence of marked MD significantly reduces mammographic sensitivity for breast cancer, even with state-of-the-art DM. Recognition of this led to the formation of a powerful lobby group ('Are You Dense') in the US, as a consequence of which 32 states have legislated for mandatory disclosure of MD to women undergoing mammography. Secondly, it is now widely accepted that MD is in itself a risk factor for breast cancer, with a four-to sixfold increased relative risk in women with PMD in the highest quintile compared to those with PMD in the lowest quintile. Consequently, major research efforts are underway to assess whether use of MD could provide a major step forward towards risk-adapted, personalised breast cancer prevention, imaging, and treatment.