1
|
Yeap PL, Wong YM, Lee KH, Koh CWY, Lew KS, Chua CGA, Wibawa A, Master Z, Lee JCL, Park SY, Tan HQ. A treatment-site-specific evaluation of commercial synthetic computed tomography solutions for proton therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100639. [PMID: 39297079 PMCID: PMC11407964 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 08/25/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 09/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Despite the superior dose conformity of proton therapy, the dose distribution is sensitive to daily anatomical changes, which can affect treatment accuracy. This study evaluated the dose recalculation accuracy of two synthetic computed tomography (sCT) generation algorithms in a commercial treatment planning system. Materials and methods The evaluation was conducted for head-and-neck, thorax-and-abdomen, and pelvis sites treated with proton therapy. Thirty patients with two cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans each were selected. The sCT images were generated from CBCT scans using two algorithms, Corrected CBCT (corrCBCT) and Virtual CT (vCT). Dose recalculations were performed based on these images for comparison with "ground truth" deformed CTs. Results The choice of algorithm influenced dose recalculation accuracy, particularly in high dose regions. For head-and-neck cases, the corrCBCT method showed closer agreement with the "ground truth", while for thorax-and-abdomen and pelvis cases, the vCT algorithm yielded better results (mean percentage dose discrepancy of 0.6 %, 1.3 % and 0.5 % for the three sites, respectively, in the high dose region). Head-and-neck and pelvis cases exhibited excellent agreement in high dose regions (2 %/2 mm gamma passing rate >98 %), while thorax-and-abdomen cases exhibited the largest differences, suggesting caution in sCT algorithm usage for this site. Significant systematic differences were observed in the clinical target volume and organ-at-risk doses in head-and-neck and pelvis cases, highlighting the importance of using the correct algorithm. Conclusions This study provided treatment site-specific recommendations for sCT algorithm selection in proton therapy. The findings offered insights for proton beam centers implementing adaptive radiotherapy workflows.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ping Lin Yeap
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yun Ming Wong
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Kang Hao Lee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - Kah Seng Lew
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Clifford Ghee Ann Chua
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Andrew Wibawa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zubin Master
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - James Cheow Lei Lee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
| | - Sung Yong Park
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Hong Qi Tan
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Physics and Applied Physics, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore
- Oncology Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jang J, Lee K, Kim TK. Unsupervised Contour Tracking of Live Cells by Mechanical and Cycle Consistency Losses. PROCEEDINGS. IEEE COMPUTER SOCIETY CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER VISION AND PATTERN RECOGNITION 2023; 2023:227-236. [PMID: 38250674 PMCID: PMC10798679 DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Analyzing the dynamic changes of cellular morphology is important for understanding the various functions and characteristics of live cells, including stem cells and metastatic cancer cells. To this end, we need to track all points on the highly deformable cellular contour in every frame of live cell video. Local shapes and textures on the contour are not evident, and their motions are complex, often with expansion and contraction of local contour features. The prior arts for optical flow or deep point set tracking are unsuited due to the fluidity of cells, and previous deep contour tracking does not consider point correspondence. We propose the first deep learning-based tracking of cellular (or more generally viscoelastic materials) contours with point correspondence by fusing dense representation between two contours with cross attention. Since it is impractical to manually label dense tracking points on the contour, unsupervised learning comprised of the mechanical and cyclical consistency losses is proposed to train our contour tracker. The mechanical loss forcing the points to move perpendicular to the contour effectively helps out. For quantitative evaluation, we labeled sparse tracking points along the contour of live cells from two live cell datasets taken with phase contrast and confocal fluorescence microscopes. Our contour tracker quantitatively outperforms compared methods and produces qualitatively more favorable results. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/JunbongJang/contour-tracking/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kwonmoo Lee
- Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berger T, Noble DJ, Shelley LE, McMullan T, Bates A, Thomas S, Carruthers LJ, Beckett G, Duffton A, Paterson C, Jena R, McLaren DB, Burnet NG, Nailon WH. Predicting radiotherapy-induced xerostomia in head and neck cancer patients using day-to-day kinetics of radiomics features. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 24:95-101. [PMID: 36386445 PMCID: PMC9647222 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 10/31/2022] [Accepted: 10/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose The images acquired during radiotherapy for image-guidance purposes could be used to monitor patient-specific response to irradiation and improve treatment personalisation. We investigated whether the kinetics of radiomics features from daily mega-voltage CT image-guidance scans (MVCT) improve prediction of moderate-to-severe xerostomia compared to dose/volume parameters in radiotherapy of head-and-neck cancer (HNC). Materials and Methods All included HNC patients (N = 117) received 30 or more fractions of radiotherapy with daily MVCTs. Radiomics features were calculated on the contra-lateral parotid glands of daily MVCTs. Their variations over time after each complete week of treatment were used to predict moderate-to-severe xerostomia (CTCAEv4.03 grade ≥ 2) at 6, 12 and 24 months post-radiotherapy. After dimensionality reduction, backward/forward selection was used to generate combinations of predictors.Three types of logistic regression model were generated for each follow-up time: 1) a pre-treatment reference model using dose/volume parameters, 2) a combination of dose/volume and radiomics-based predictors, and 3) radiomics-based predictors. The models were internally validated by cross-validation and bootstrapping and their performance evaluated using Area Under the Curve (AUC) on separate training and testing sets. Results Moderate-to-severe xerostomia was reported by 46 %, 33 % and 26 % of the patients at 6, 12 and 24 months respectively. The selected models using radiomics-based features extracted at or before mid-treatment outperformed the dose-based models with an AUCtrain/AUCtest of 0.70/0.69, 0.76/0.74, 0.86/0.86 at 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusion Our results suggest that radiomics features calculated on MVCTs from the first half of the radiotherapy course improve prediction of moderate-to-severe xerostomia in HNC patients compared to a dose-based pre-treatment model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Berger
- Department of Oncology Physics, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - David J. Noble
- The University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Leila E.A. Shelley
- Department of Oncology Physics, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Thomas McMullan
- Department of Oncology Physics, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Amy Bates
- The University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Simon Thomas
- Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Linda J. Carruthers
- Department of Oncology Physics, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - George Beckett
- Edinburgh Parallel Computing Centre, Bayes Centre, 47 Potterrow, Edinburgh EH8 9BT, UK
| | - Aileen Duffton
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - Claire Paterson
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, UK
| | - Raj Jena
- The University of Cambridge, Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Duncan B. McLaren
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
| | - Neil G. Burnet
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - William H. Nailon
- Department of Oncology Physics, Edinburgh Cancer Centre, Western General Hospital, Crewe Road South, Edinburgh EH4 2XU, UK
- School of Engineering, the University of Edinburgh, the King’s Buildings, Mayfield Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dossun C, Niederst C, Noel G, Meyer P. Evaluation of DIR algorithm performance in real patients for radiotherapy treatments: A systematic review of operator-dependent strategies. Phys Med 2022; 101:137-157. [PMID: 36007403 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The performance of deformable medical image registration (DIR) algorithms has become a major concern. METHODS We aimed to obtain updated information on DIR algorithm performance quantification through a literature review of articles published between 2010 and 2022. We focused only on studies using operator-based methods to treat real patients. The PubMed, Google Scholar and Embase databases were searched following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS One hundred and seven articles were identified. The mean number of patients and registrations per publication was 20 and 63, respectively. We found 23 different geometric metrics appearing at least twice, and the dosimetric impact of DIR was quantified in 32 articles. Forty-eight different at-risk organs were described, and target volumes were studied in 43 publications. Prostate, head-and-neck and thoracic locations represented more than ¾ of the studied locations. We summarized the type of DIR and the images used, and other key elements. Intra/interobserver variability, threshold values and the correlation between metrics were also discussed. CONCLUSIONS This literature review covers the past decade and should facilitate the implementation of DIR algorithms in clinical practice by providing practical and pertinent information to quantify their performance on real patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dossun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - C Niederst
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - G Noel
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France
| | - P Meyer
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut de Cancerologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS), Strasbourg, France; ICUBE, CNRS UMR 7357, Team IMAGES, Strasbourg, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rutin induces endoplasmic reticulum stress-associated apoptosis in human triple-negative breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells – In vitro and in silico docking studies. ARAB J CHEM 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2022.104021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
6
|
Shelley LEA, Sutcliffe MPF, Harrison K, Scaife JE, Parker MA, Romanchikova M, Thomas SJ, Jena R, Burnet NG. Autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage image guidance scans. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019; 5:025006. [PMID: 31057946 PMCID: PMC6466640 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaf1db] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Autosegmentation of image guidance (IG) scans is crucial for streamlining and optimising delivered dose calculation in radiotherapy. By accounting for interfraction motion, daily delivered dose can be accumulated and incorporated into automated systems for adaptive radiotherapy. Autosegmentation of IG scans is challenging due to poorer image quality than typical planning kilovoltage computed tomography (kVCT) systems, and the resulting reduction of soft tissue contrast in regions such as the pelvis makes organ boundaries less distinguishable. Current autosegmentation solutions generally involve propagation of planning contours to the IG scan by deformable image registration (DIR). Here, we present a novel approach for primary autosegmentation of the rectum on megavoltage IG scans acquired during prostate radiotherapy, based on the Chan-Vese algorithm. Pre-processing steps such as Hounsfield unit/intensity scaling, identifying search regions, dealing with air, and handling the prostate, are detailed. Post-processing features include identification of implausible contours (nominally those affected by muscle or air), 3D self-checking, smoothing, and interpolation. In cases where the algorithm struggles, the best estimate on a given slice may revert to the propagated kVCT rectal contour. Algorithm parameters were optimised systematically for a training cohort of 26 scans, and tested on a validation cohort of 30 scans, from 10 patients. Manual intervention was not required. Comparing Chan-Vese autocontours with contours manually segmented by an experienced clinical oncologist achieved a mean Dice Similarity Coefficient of 0.78 (SE < 0.011). This was comparable with DIR methods for kVCT and CBCT published in the literature. The autosegmentation system was developed within the VoxTox Research Programme for accumulation of delivered dose to the rectum in prostate radiotherapy, but may have applicability to further anatomical sites and imaging modalities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L E A Shelley
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M P F Sutcliffe
- University of Cambridge, Department of Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - K Harrison
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - J E Scaife
- Gloucestershire Oncology Centre, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, United Kingdom
| | - M A Parker
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Cambridge, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - M Romanchikova
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, United Kingdom
| | - S J Thomas
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - R Jena
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Oncology Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - N G Burnet
- Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Noble DJ, Yeap PL, Seah SYK, Harrison K, Shelley LEA, Romanchikova M, Bates AM, Zheng Y, Barnett GC, Benson RJ, Jefferies SJ, Thomas SJ, Jena R, Burnet NG. Anatomical change during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer, and its effect on delivered dose to the spinal cord. Radiother Oncol 2018; 130:32-38. [PMID: 30049455 PMCID: PMC6358720 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 07/07/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
A cohort of 133 head & neck cancer patients treated with TomoTherapy was examined. Differences between planned and delivered maximum spinal cord dose were small. Substantial weight loss and anatomical change during treatment was observed. No link between weight loss or anatomical change, and dose differences was seen.
Background and purpose The impact of weight loss and anatomical change during head and neck (H&N) radiotherapy on spinal cord dosimetry is poorly understood, limiting evidence-based adaptive management strategies. Materials and methods 133 H&N patients treated with daily mega-voltage CT image-guidance (MVCT-IG) on TomoTherapy, were selected. Elastix software was used to deform planning scan SC contours to MVCT-IG scans, and accumulate dose. Planned (DP) and delivered (DA) spinal cord D2% (SCD2%) were compared. Univariate relationships between neck irradiation strategy (unilateral vs bilateral), T-stage, N-stage, weight loss, and changes in lateral separation (LND) and CT slice surface area (SSA) at C1 and the superior thyroid notch (TN), and ΔSCD2% [(DA – DP) D2%] were examined. Results The mean value for (DA – DP) D2% was −0.07 Gy (95%CI −0.28 to 0.14, range −5.7 Gy to 3.8 Gy), and the mean absolute difference between DP and DA (independent of difference direction) was 0.9 Gy (95%CI 0.76–1.04 Gy). Neck treatment strategy (p = 0.39) and T-stage (p = 0.56) did not affect ΔSCD2%. Borderline significance (p = 0.09) was seen for higher N-stage (N2-3) and higher ΔSCD2%. Mean reductions in anatomical metrics were substantial: weight loss 6.8 kg; C1LND 12.9 mm; C1SSA 12.1 cm2; TNLND 5.3 mm; TNSSA 11.2 cm2, but no relationship between weight loss or anatomical change and ΔSCD2% was observed (all r2 < 0.1). Conclusions Differences between delivered and planned spinal cord D2% are small in patients treated with daily IG. Even patients experiencing substantial weight loss or anatomical change during treatment do not require adaptive replanning for spinal cord safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J Noble
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - Ping-Lin Yeap
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Shannon Y K Seah
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Karl Harrison
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, UK
| | - Leila E A Shelley
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Engineering, University of Cambridge, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marina Romanchikova
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Amy M Bates
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Cambridge Clinical Trials Unit, Box 401, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK
| | - Yaolin Zheng
- University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, UK; Department of Medicine, Cheltenham General Hospital, UK
| | - Gillian C Barnett
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Richard J Benson
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Sarah J Jefferies
- Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Simon J Thomas
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Department of Medical Physics and Clinical Engineering, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Raj Jena
- Cancer Research UK VoxTox Research Group, University of Cambridge Department of Oncology, Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Addenbrooke's Hospital, UK; Oncology Centre, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Neil G Burnet
- University of Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|