Monte Carlo simulation of radiation transport and dose deposition from locally released gold nanoparticles labeled with111In,177Lu or90Y incorporated into tissue implantable depots

Radiation nanomedicines for cancer treatment: a scientific journey and view of the landscape

BACKGROUND

Radiation nanomedicines are nanoparticles labeled with radionuclides that emit α- or β-particles or Auger electrons for cancer treatment. We describe here our 15 years scientific journey studying locally-administered radiation nanomedicines for cancer treatment. We further present a view of the radiation nanomedicine landscape by reviewing research reported by other groups.

MAIN BODY

Gold nanoparticles were studied initially for radiosensitization of breast cancer to X-radiation therapy. These nanoparticles were labeled with 111In to assess their biodistribution after intratumoural vs. intravenous injection. Intravenous injection was limited by high liver and spleen uptake and low tumour uptake, while intratumoural injection provided high tumour uptake but low normal tissue uptake. Further, [111In]In-labeled gold nanoparticles modified with trastuzumab and injected iintratumourally exhibited strong tumour growth inhibition in mice with subcutaneous HER2-positive human breast cancer xenografts. In subsequent studies, strong tumour growth inhibition in mice was achieved without normal tissue toxicity in mice with human breast cancer xenografts injected intratumourally with gold nanoparticles labeled with β-particle emitting 177Lu and modified with panitumumab or trastuzumab to specifically bind EGFR or HER2, respectively. A nanoparticle depot (nanodepot) was designed to incorporate and deliver radiolabeled gold nanoparticles to tumours using brachytherapy needle insertion techniques. Treatment of mice with s.c. 4T1 murine mammary carcinoma tumours with a nanodepot incorporating [90Y]Y-labeled gold nanoparticles inserted into one tumour arrested tumour growth and caused an abscopal growth-inhibitory effect on a distant second tumour. Convection-enhanced delivery of [177Lu]Lu-AuNPs to orthotopic human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumours in mice arrested tumour growth without normal tissue toxicity. Other groups have explored radiation nanomedicines for cancer treatment in preclinical animal tumour xenograft models using gold nanoparticles, liposomes, block copolymer micelles, dendrimers, carbon nanotubes, cellulose nanocrystals or iron oxide nanoparticles. These nanoparticles were labeled with radionuclides emitting Auger electrons (111In, 99mTc, 125I, 103Pd, 193mPt, 195mPt), β-particles (177Lu, 186Re, 188Re, 90Y, 198Au, 131I) or α-particles (225Ac, 213Bi, 212Pb, 211At, 223Ra). These studies employed intravenous or intratumoural injection or convection enhanced delivery. Local administration of these radiation nanomedicines was most effective and minimized normal tissue toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation nanomedicines have shown great promise for treating cancer in preclinical studies. Local intratumoural administration avoids sequestration by the liver and spleen and is most effective for treating tumours, while minimizing normal tissue toxicity.

Treatment of Orthotopic U251 Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Tumors in NRG Mice by Convection-Enhanced Delivery of Gold Nanoparticles Labeled with the β-Particle-Emitting Radionuclide, 177Lu

In this study, we investigated convection-enhanced delivery (CED) of 23 ± 3 nm gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) labeled with the β-particle-emitting radionuclide ¹⁷⁷Lu (¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs) for treatment of orthotopic U251-Luc human glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors in NRG mice. The cytotoxicity in vitro of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs (0.0-2.0 MBq, 4 × 10¹¹ AuNPs) on U251-Luc cells was also studied by a clonogenic survival assay, and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) caused by β-particle emissions of ¹⁷⁷Lu were measured by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy for γH2AX. NRG mice with U251-Luc tumors in the right cerebral hemisphere of the brain were treated by CED of 1.1 ± 0.2 MBq of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs (4 × 10¹¹ AuNPs). Control mice received unlabeled AuNPs or normal saline. Tumor retention of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs was assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) imaging and biodistribution studies. Radiation doses were estimated for the tumor, brain, and other organs. The effectiveness for treating GBM tumors was determined by bioluminescence imaging (BLI) and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and by Kaplan-Meier median survival. Normal tissue toxicity was assessed by monitoring body weight and hematology and blood biochemistry analyses at 14 d post-treatment. ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs (2.0 MBq, 4 × 10¹¹ AuNPs) decreased the clonogenic survival of U251-Luc cells to 0.005 ± 0.002 and increased DNA DSBs by 14.3-fold compared to cells treated with unlabeled AuNPs or normal saline. A high proportion of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs was retained in the U251-Luc tumor in NRG mice up to 21 d with minimal re-distribution to the brain or other organs. The radiation dose in the tumor was high (599 Gy). The dose in the normal right cerebral hemisphere of the brain excluding the tumor was 93-fold lower (6.4 Gy), and 2000-3000-fold lower doses were calculated for the contralateral left cerebral hemisphere (0.3 Gy) or cerebellum (0.2 Gy). The doses in peripheral organs were <0.1 Gy. BLI revealed almost complete tumor growth arrest in mice treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs, while tumors grew rapidly in control mice. MRI at 28 d post-treatment and histological staining showed no visible tumor in mice treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs but large GBM tumors in control mice. All control mice reached a humane endpoint requiring sacrifice within 39 d (normal saline) or 45 d post-treatment (unlabeled AuNPs), while 5/8 mice treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs survived up to 150 d. No normal tissue toxicity was observed in mice treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs. We conclude that CED of ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs was highly effective for treating U251-Luc human GBM tumors in the brain in NRG mice at amounts that were non-toxic to normal tissues. These ¹⁷⁷Lu-AuNPs administered by CED hold promise for treating patients with GBM to prevent recurrence and improve long-term outcome.

90Y-Labeled Gold Nanoparticle Depot (NPD) Combined with Anti-PD-L1 Antibodies Strongly Inhibits the Growth of 4T1 Tumors in Immunocompetent Mice and Induces an Abscopal Effect on a Distant Non-Irradiated Tumor

The effectiveness and normal tissue toxicity of a novel nanoparticle depot (NPD) brachytherapy seed incorporating gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) labeled with β-particle emitting, ⁹⁰Y (termed a "radiation nanomedicine"), were studied for the treatment of 4T1 triple-negative murine mammary carcinoma tumors in Balb/c mice and for inducing an abscopal effect on a distant non-irradiated tumor alone or combined with anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint antibodies. Balb/c mice with two subcutaneous 4T1 tumors─a primary tumor and a distant secondary tumor were implanted intratumorally (i.t.) in the primary tumor with NPD incorporating 3.5 MBq of ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs (1 × 10¹⁴ AuNPs) or unlabeled AuNPs, alone or combined with systemically administered anti-PD-L1 antibodies (200 μg i.p. three times/week for 2 weeks) or received anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone or no treatment. The primary tumor was strongly growth-inhibited over 14 d by NPD incorporating ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs but only very modestly inhibited by NPD incorporating unlabeled AuNPs. Anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone were ineffective, and combining anti-PD-L1 antibodies with NPD incorporating ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs did not further inhibit the growth of the primary tumor. Secondary tumor growth was inhibited by treatment of the primary tumor with NPD incorporating ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs, and growth inhibition was enhanced by anti-PD-L1 antibodies. Treatment of the primary tumor with NPD incorporating unlabeled AuNPs or anti-PD-L1 antibodies alone had no effect on secondary tumor growth. Biodistribution studies showed high uptake of ⁹⁰Y in the primary tumor [516-810% implanted dose/g (%ID/g)] but very low uptake in the secondary tumor (0.033-0.16% ID/g) and in normal tissues (<0.5% ID/g) except for kidneys (5-8% ID/g). Very high radiation absorbed doses were estimated for the primary tumor (472 Gy) but very low doses in the secondary tumor (0.13 Gy). There was highdose-heterogeneity in the primary tumor with doses as high as 9964 Gy in close proximity to the NPD, decreasing rapidly with distance from the NPD. Normal organ doses were low (<1 Gy) except for kidneys (4 Gy). No normal tissue toxicity was observed, but white blood cell counts (WBC) decreased in tumor-bearing mice treated with NPD incorporating ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs. Decreased WBC counts were interpreted as tumor response and not toxicity since these were higher than that in healthy non-tumor-bearing mice, and there was a direct association between WBC counts and 4T1 tumor burden. We conclude that implantation of NPD incorporating ⁹⁰Y-AuNPs into a primary 4T1 tumor in Balb/c mice strongly inhibited tumor growth and combined with anti-PD-L1 antibodies induced an abscopal effect on a distant secondary tumor. This radiation nanomedicine is promising for the local treatment of triple-negative breast cancer tumors in patients, and these therapeutic effects may extend to non-irradiated lesions, especially when combined with checkpoint immunotherapy.

Gold nanoparticles meet medical radionuclides

Thanks to their unique optical and physicochemical properties, gold nanoparticles have gained increased interest as radiosensitizing, photothermal therapy and optical imaging agents to enhance the effectiveness of cancer detection and therapy. Furthermore, their ability to carry multiple medically relevant radionuclides broadens their use to nuclear medicine SPECT and PET imaging as well as targeted radionuclide therapy. In this review, we discuss the radiolabeling process of gold nanoparticles and their use in (multimodal) nuclear medicine imaging to better understand their specific distribution, uptake and retention in different in vivo cancer models. In addition, radiolabeled gold nanoparticles enable image-guided therapy is reviewed as well as the enhancement of targeted radionuclide therapy and nanobrachytherapy through an increased dose deposition and radiosensitization, as demonstrated by multiple Monte Carlo studies and experimental in vitro and in vivo studies.

Radiolabeled Gold Nanoparticles for Imaging and Therapy of Cancer

In the Last decades, nanotechnology has provided novel and alternative methodologies and tools in the field of medical oncology, in order to tackle the issues regarding the control and treatment of cancer in modern society. In particular, the use of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in radiopharmaceutical development has provided various nanometric platforms for the delivery of medically relevant radioisotopes for SPECT/PET diagnosis and/or radionuclide therapy. In this review, we intend to provide insight on the methodologies used to obtain and characterize radiolabeled AuNPs while reporting relevant examples of AuNPs developed during the last decade for applications in nuclear imaging and/or radionuclide therapy, and highlighting the most significant preclinical studies and results.

Dual-Receptor-Targeted (DRT) Radiation Nanomedicine Labeled with 177Lu Is More Potent for Killing Human Breast Cancer Cells That Coexpress HER2 and EGFR Than Single-Receptor-Targeted (SRT) Radiation Nanomedicines

Resistance to HER2-targeted therapies in breast cancer (BC) is associated in some cases with an increased expression of epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR). We describe a dual-receptor-targeted (DRT) radiation nanomedicine for local intratumoral (i.t.) treatment of BC composed of 15 nm sized gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) modified with trastuzumab (TmAb) to target HER2 and panitumumab (PmAb) to target EGFR. The AuNPs were modified with poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG_3k) linked to 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid (DOTA) chelators to complex the β-particle emitter, ¹⁷⁷Lu. Our aim was to compare the properties of these DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu with single-receptor-targeted (SRT)-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or nontargeted (NT)-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu using human BC cells that expressed HER2, EGFR, or both receptors. To construct these radiation nanomedicines, PEG_5K was linked to TmAb or PmAb, while PEG_3k was linked to DOTA. These polymers were conjugated to AuNP via two Au-thiol bonds using a terminal lipoic acid (LA) group on the polymers. NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were constructed without modification with TmAb or PmAb. MDA-MB-231-H2N, MDA-MB-468, and BT-474 human BC cells were designated as HER2^mod/EGFR^mod, EGFR^high/HER2^neg, and HER2^high/EGFR^low, respectively, based on the expression of these receptors. Specific binding to HER2 and/or EGFR was assessed by incubating BC cells with DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu, or NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu in the absence or presence of an excess of TmAb or PmAb or both competitors. Binding and internalization of AuNP by BC cells were assessed by dark-field microscopy. Cell fractionation studies were conducted to quantify AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu bound and internalized. The cytotoxicity of DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu was determined in clonogenic survival (CS) assays after an exposure of 5 × 10⁵ BC cells to 3 MBq (1.4 × 10¹² AuNP) for 16 h and then seeding and culturing the cells for 7-15 days. CS was compared to exposure to TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. The absorbed doses to the nucleus in these CS assays were estimated. DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were specifically bound by BC cells that expressed HER2 or EGFR or both receptors. In contrast, SRT-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were bound and internalized only by BC cells that expressed HER2 or EGFR, respectively. NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu exhibited very low binding to BC cells. DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu and SRT-TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were internalized by BC cells in accordance with the receptor expression. Importantly, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent in vitro than PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu for killing MDA-MB-231-H2N cells that coexpress HER2 and EGFR (CS = 18.8 ± 1.0 vs 51.5 ± 10.4%; P = 0.006). Furthermore, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent for killing BT-474 cells with high HER2 but low EGFR expression than TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 8.9 ± 3.3 vs 20.7 ± 2.4%; P = 0.007) or PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 63.9 ± 1.7%; P < 0.0001). Even for MDA-MB-468 cells that overexpress EGFR but have negligible HER2, DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more potent for cell killing than PmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (CS = 3.2 ± 3.0 vs 7.5 ± 1.8%; P = 0.001) or TmAb-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu (63.2 ± 3.2%; P = 0.0002). All targeted forms of AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu were more cytotoxic to BC cells than those of NT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. High absorbed doses (36-119 Gy) were deposited in the nucleus of BC cells by DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu. We conclude that a DRT radiation nanomedicine is more potent for killing BC cells that coexpress HER2 and EGFR than SRT radiation nanomedicines. These results are promising for further evaluation of these DRT-AuNP-¹⁷⁷Lu in vivo for the local radiation treatment of human BC tumors that coexpress HER2 and EGFR in mice following i.t. injection, especially tumors that are resistant to HER2-targeted therapies.

Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review

Background

Auger electrons (AEs) are very low energy electrons that are emitted by radionuclides that decay by electron capture (e.g. ¹¹¹In, ⁶⁷Ga, ^99mTc, ^195mPt, ¹²⁵I and ¹²³I). This energy is deposited over nanometre-micrometre distances, resulting in high linear energy transfer (LET) that is potent for causing lethal damage in cancer cells. Thus, AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have great potential for treatment of cancer. In this review, we describe the radiobiological properties of AEs, their radiation dosimetry, radiolabelling methods, and preclinical and clinical studies that have been performed to investigate AEs for cancer treatment.

Results

AEs are most lethal to cancer cells when emitted near the cell nucleus and especially when incorporated into DNA (e.g. ¹²⁵I-IUdR). AEs cause DNA damage both directly and indirectly via water radiolysis. AEs can also kill targeted cancer cells by damaging the cell membrane, and kill non-targeted cells through a cross-dose or bystander effect. The radiation dosimetry of AEs considers both organ doses and cellular doses. The Medical Internal Radiation Dose (MIRD) schema may be applied. Radiolabelling methods for complexing AE-emitters to biomolecules (antibodies and peptides) and nanoparticles include radioiodination (¹²⁵I and ¹²³I) or radiometal chelation (¹¹¹In, ⁶⁷Ga, ^99mTc). Cancer cells exposed in vitro to AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents exhibit decreased clonogenic survival correlated at least in part with unrepaired DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) detected by immunofluorescence for γH2AX, and chromosomal aberrations. Preclinical studies of AE-emitting radiotherapeutic agents have shown strong tumour growth inhibition in vivo in tumour xenograft mouse models. Minimal normal tissue toxicity was found due to the restricted toxicity of AEs mostly on tumour cells targeted by the radiotherapeutic agents. Clinical studies of AEs for cancer treatment have been limited but some encouraging results were obtained in early studies using ¹¹¹In-DTPA-octreotide and ¹²⁵I-IUdR, in which tumour remissions were achieved in several patients at administered amounts that caused low normal tissue toxicity, as well as promising improvements in the survival of glioblastoma patients with ¹²⁵I-mAb 425, with minimal normal tissue toxicity.

Conclusions

Proof-of-principle for AE radiotherapy of cancer has been shown preclinically, and clinically in a limited number of studies. The recent introduction of many biologically-targeted therapies for cancer creates new opportunities to design novel AE-emitting agents for cancer treatment. Pierre Auger did not conceive of the application of AEs for targeted cancer treatment, but this is a tremendously exciting future that we and many other scientists in this field envision.

Gold Nanoparticles in Radiotherapy and Recent Progress in Nanobrachytherapy

Over the last few decades, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) have emerged as "radiosensitizers" in oncology. Radiosensitizers are additives that can enhance the effects of radiation on biological tissues treated with radiotherapy. The interaction of photons with GNPs leads to the emission of low-energy and short-range secondary electrons, which in turn increase the dose deposited in tissues. In this context, GNPs are the subject of intensive theoretical and experimental studies aiming at optimizing the parameters leading to greater dose enhancement and highest therapeutic effect. This review describes the main mechanisms occurring between photons and GNPs that lead to dose enhancement. The outcome of theoretical simulations of the interactions between GNPs and photons is presented. Finally, the findings of the most recent in vivo studies about interactions between GNPs and photon sources (e.g., external beams, brachytherapy sources, and molecules labeled with radioisotopes) are described. The advantages and challenges inherent to each of these approaches are discussed. Future directions, providing new guidelines for the successful translation of GNPs into clinical applications, are also highlighted.

Modeling of Scattering Cross Section for Mineral Aerosol with a Gaussian Beam

Based on the generalized Lorenz Mie theory (GLMT), the scattering cross section of mineral aerosol within the Gaussian beam is investigated, and an appropriate modeling of the scattering cross sections for the real mineral aerosols including the feldspar, quartz, and red clay is proposed. In this modeling, the spheroid shape is applied to represent the real nonspherical mineral aerosol, and these nonspherical particles are randomly distributed within the Gaussian beam region. Meanwhile, the Monte Carlo statistical estimate method is used to determine the distributed positions of these random nonspherical particles. Moreover, a method for the nonspherical particles is proposed to represent the scattering cross section of the real mineral aerosols. In addition, the T matrix method is also used to calculate the scattering cross sections of the spheroid particles in order to compare the scattering properties between the plane wave and the Gaussian wave. Simulation results indicate that fairly reasonable results of the scattering cross sections for the mineral aerosols can be obtained with this proposed method, and it can provide a reliable and efficient approach to reproduce the scattering cross sections of the real randomly distributed mineral aerosols illuminated by the Gaussian beam.