Significance of the impact of motion compensation on the variability of PET image features

Comparison of the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated PET/CT based radiomics features with ungated PET/CT in lung lesions

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the variability and diagnostic efficacy of respiratory-gated (RG) PET/CT based radiomics features compared to ungated (UG) PET/CT in the differentiation of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and benign lesions.

METHODS

117 patients with suspected lung lesions from March 2020 to May 2021 and consent to undergo UG PET/CT and chest RG PET/CT (including phase-based quiescent period gating, pQPG and phase-matched 4D PET/CT, 4DRG) were prospectively included. 377 radiomics features were extracted from PET images of each scan. Paired t test was used to compare UG and RG features for inter-scan variability analysis. We developed three radiomics models with UG and RG features (i.e. UGModel, pQPGModel and 4DRGModel). ROC curves were used to compare diagnostic efficiencies, and the model-level comparison of diagnostic value was performed by five-fold cross-validation. A P value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 111 patients (average age ± standard deviation was 59.1 ± 11.6 y, range, 29 - 88 y, and 63 were males) with 209 lung lesions were analyzed for features variability and the subgroup of 126 non-metastasis lesions in 91 patients without treatment before PET/CT were included for diagnosis analysis. 101/377 (26.8 %) 4DRG features and 82/377 (21.8 %) pQPG features showed significant difference compared to UG features (both P<0.05). 61/377 (16.2 %) and 59/377 (15.6 %) of them showed significantly better discriminant ability (ΔAUC% (i.e. (AUCRG - AUCUG) / AUCUG×100 %) > 0 and P<0.05) in malignant recognition, respectively. For the model-level comparison, 4DRGModel achieved the highest diagnostic efficacy (sen 73.2 %, spe 87.3 %) compared with UGModel (sen 57.7 %, spe 76.4 %) and pQPGModel (sen 63.4 %, spe 81.8 %).

CONCLUSION

RG PET/CT performs better in the quantitative assessment of metabolic heterogeneity for lung lesions and the subsequent diagnosis in patients with NSCLC compared with UG PET/CT.

Development and evaluation of two open-source nnU-Net models for automatic segmentation of lung tumors on PET and CT images with and without respiratory motion compensation

OBJECTIVES

In lung cancer, one of the main limitations for the optimal integration of the biological and anatomical information derived from Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) is the time and expertise required for the evaluation of the different respiratory phases. In this study, we present two open-source models able to automatically segment lung tumors on PET and CT, with and without motion compensation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study involved time-bin gated (4D) and non-gated (3D) PET/CT images from two prospective lung cancer cohorts (Trials 108237 and 108472) and one retrospective. For model construction, the ground truth (GT) was defined by consensus of two experts, and the nnU-Net with 5-fold cross-validation was applied to 560 4D-images for PET and 100 3D-images for CT. The test sets included 270 4D- images and 19 3D-images for PET and 80 4D-images and 27 3D-images for CT, recruited at 10 different centres.

RESULTS

In the performance evaluation with the multicentre test sets, the Dice Similarity Coefficients (DSC) obtained for our PET model were DSC(4D-PET) = 0.74 ± 0.06, improving 19% relative to the DSC between experts and DSC(3D-PET) = 0.82 ± 0.11. The performance for CT was DSC(4D-CT) = 0.61 ± 0.28 and DSC(3D-CT) = 0.63 ± 0.34, improving 4% and 15% relative to DSC between experts.

CONCLUSIONS

Performance evaluation demonstrated that the automatic segmentation models have the potential to achieve accuracy comparable to manual segmentation and thus hold promise for clinical application. The resulting models can be freely downloaded and employed to support the integration of 3D- or 4D- PET/CT and to facilitate the evaluation of its impact on lung cancer clinical practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

We provide two open-source nnU-Net models for the automatic segmentation of lung tumors on PET/CT to facilitate the optimal integration of biological and anatomical information in clinical practice. The models have superior performance compared to the variability observed in manual segmentations by the different experts for images with and without motion compensation, allowing to take advantage in the clinical practice of the more accurate and robust 4D-quantification.

KEY POINTS

Lung tumor segmentation on PET/CT imaging is limited by respiratory motion and manual delineation is time consuming and suffer from inter- and intra-variability. Our segmentation models had superior performance compared to the manual segmentations by different experts. Automating PET image segmentation allows for easier clinical implementation of biological information.

Free automatic software for quality assurance of computed tomography calibration, edges and radiomics metrics reproducibility

PURPOSE

To develop a QA procedure, easy to use, reproducible and based on open-source code, to automatically evaluate the stability of different metrics extracted from CT images: Hounsfield Unit (HU) calibration, edge characterization metrics (contrast and drop range) and radiomic features.

METHODS

The QA protocol was based on electron density phantom imaging. Home-made open-source Python code was developed for the automatic computation of the metrics and their reproducibility analysis. The impact on reproducibility was evaluated for different radiation therapy protocols, and phantom positions within the field of view and systems, in terms of variability (Shapiro-Wilk test for 15 repeated measurements carried out over three days) and comparability (Bland-Altman analysis and Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test or Kendall Rank Correlation Coefficient).

RESULTS

Regarding intrinsic variability, most metrics followed a normal distribution (88% of HU, 63% of edge parameters and 82% of radiomic features). Regarding comparability, HU and contrast were comparable in all conditions, and drop range only in the same CT scanner and phantom position. The percentages of comparable radiomic features independent of protocol, position and system were 59%, 78% and 54%, respectively. The non-significantly differences in HU calibration curves obtained for two different institutions (7%) translated in comparable Gamma Index G (1 mm, 1%, >99%).

CONCLUSIONS

An automated software to assess the reproducibility of different CT metrics was successfully created and validated. A QA routine proposal is suggested.

Fusion-based tensor radiomics using reproducible features: Application to survival prediction in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

Numerous features are commonly generated in radiomics applications as applied to medical imaging, and identification of robust radiomics features (RFs) can be an important step to derivation of reliable, reproducible solutions. In this work, we utilize a tensor radiomics (TR) framework, where numerous fusions are explored, to generate different flavours of RFs, and we aimed to identify RFs that are robust to fusion techniques in head and neck cancer. Overall, we aimed to predict progression-free survival (PFS) using Hybrid Machine Learning Systems (HMLS) and reproducible RFs.

METHODS

The study was performed on 408 patients with head and neck cancer from The Cancer Imaging Archive. After image preprocessing, 15 fusion techniques were employed to combine Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and Computed Tomography (CT) images. Subsequently, 215 RFs were extracted through a standardized radiomics software, with 17 'flavours' generated using PET-only, CT-only, and 15 fused PET&CT images. The variability of RFs across flavours was studied using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Furthermore, the features were categorized into seven reliability groups, 106 reproducible RFs with ICC>0.75 were selected, highly correlated flavours were removed, Principal Component Analysis was used to convert 17 flavours to 1 attribute, the polynomial function was utilized to increase RFs, and Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to select the relevant attributes. Finally, 3 classifiers including Random Forest (RFC), Logistic regression (LR), and Multi-layer perceptron were applied to the preselected relevant attributes to predict binary PFS. In 5-fold cross-validation, 80% of 4 divisions were utilized to train the model, and the remaining 20% was utilized to evaluate the model. Further, the remaining fold was used for external nested testing.

RESULTS

Reliability analysis indicated that most morphological features belong to the high-reliability category. By contrast, local intensity and statistical features extracted from images belong to the low-reliability category. In the tensor framework, the highest 5-fold cross-validation accuracy of 76.7%±3.3% with an external nested testing of 70.6%±6.7% resulted from the reproducible TR+polynomial function+ANOVA+LR algorithm while the accuracy of 70.0%±4.2% with the external nested testing of 67.7%±4.9% was achieved through the PCA fusion+RFC (non-tensor paradigm).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that using reproducible RFs as utilized within a tensor fusion radiomics framework, linked with ANOVA and LR, added value to prediction of progression-free survival outcome in head and neck cancer patients.

Impact of motion correction on [18F]-MK6240 tau PET imaging

Objective. Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of tau deposition using [18F]-MK6240 often involves long acquisitions in older subjects, many of whom exhibit dementia symptoms. The resulting unavoidable head motion can greatly degrade image quality. Motion increases the variability of PET quantitation for longitudinal studies across subjects, resulting in larger sample sizes in clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment.Approach. After using an ultra-short frame-by-frame motion detection method based on the list-mode data, we applied an event-by-event list-mode reconstruction to generate the motion-corrected images from 139 scans acquired in 65 subjects. This approach was initially validated in two phantoms experiments against optical tracking data. We developed a motion metric based on the average voxel displacement in the brain to quantify the level of motion in each scan and consequently evaluate the effect of motion correction on images from studies with substantial motion. We estimated the rate of tau accumulation in longitudinal studies (51 subjects) by calculating the difference in the ratio of standard uptake values in key brain regions for AD. We compared the regions' standard deviations across subjects from motion and non-motion-corrected images.Main results. Individually, 14% of the scans exhibited notable motion quantified by the proposed motion metric, affecting 48% of the longitudinal datasets with three time points and 25% of all subjects. Motion correction decreased the blurring in images from scans with notable motion and improved the accuracy in quantitative measures. Motion correction reduced the standard deviation of the rate of tau accumulation by -49%, -24%, -18%, and -16% in the entorhinal, inferior temporal, precuneus, and amygdala regions, respectively.Significance. The list-mode-based motion correction method is capable of correcting both fast and slow motion during brain PET scans. It leads to improved brain PET quantitation, which is crucial for imaging AD.

Impact of image quality on radiomics applications

Radiomics features extracted from medical images have been widely reported to be useful in the patient specific outcome modeling for variety of assessment and prediction purposes. Successful application of radiomics features as imaging biomarkers, however, is dependent on the robustness of the approach to the variation in each step of the modeling workflow. Variation in the input image quality is one of the main sources that impacts the reproducibility of radiomics analysis when a model is applied to broader range of medical imaging data. The quality of medical image is generally affected by both the scanner related factors such as image acquisition/reconstruction settings and the patient related factors such as patient motion. This article aimed to review the published literatures in this field that reported the impact of various imaging factors on the radiomics features through the change in image quality. The literatures were categorized by different imaging modalities and also tabulated based on the imaging parameters and the class of radiomics features included in the study. Strategies for image quality standardization were discussed based on the relevant literatures and recommendations for reducing the impact of image quality variation on the radiomics in multi-institutional clinical trial were summarized at the end of this article.

[18F]FDG-PET/CT radiomics and artificial intelligence in lung cancer: Technical aspects and potential clinical applications

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Molecular imaging using [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography and/or Computed Tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT) plays an essential role in the diagnosis, evaluation of response to treatment, and prediction of outcomes. The images are evaluated using qualitative and conventional quantitative indices. However, there is far more information embedded in the images, which can be extracted by sophisticated algorithms. Recently, the concept of uncovering and analyzing the invisible data extracted from medical images, called radiomics, is gaining more attention. Currently, [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT radiomics is growingly evaluated in lung cancer to discover if it enhances the diagnostic performance or implication of [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT in the management of lung cancer. In this review, we provide a short overview of the technical aspects, as they are discussed in different articles of this special issue. We mainly focus on the diagnostic performance of the [¹⁸F]FDG-PET/CT-based radiomics and the role of artificial intelligence in non-small cell lung cancer, impacting the early detection, staging, prediction of tumor subtypes, biomarkers, and patient's outcomes.

A systematic review and quality of reporting checklist for repeatability and reproducibility of radiomic features

•

Main factors impacting feature stability: Image acquisition, reconstruction, tumor segmentation, and interpolation.

•

Textural features are less robust than morphological or statistical features.

•

A checklist is provided including items that should be reported in a radiomic study.

Purpose

Although quantitative image biomarkers (radiomics) show promising value for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment assessment, these biomarkers still lack reproducibility. In this systematic review, we aimed to assess the progress in radiomics reproducibility and repeatability in the recent years.

Methods and materials

Four hundred fifty-one abstracts were retrieved according to the original PubMed search pattern with the publication dates ranging from 2017/05/01 to 2020/12/01. Each abstract including the keywords was independently screened by four observers. Forty-two full-text articles were selected for further analysis. Patient population data, radiomic feature classes, feature extraction software, image preprocessing, and reproducibility results were extracted from each article. To support the community with a standardized reporting strategy, we propose a specific reporting checklist to evaluate the feasibility to reproduce each study.

Results

Many studies continue to under-report essential reproducibility information: all but one clinical and all but two phantom studies missed to report at least one important item reporting image acquisition. The studies included in this review indicate that all radiomic features are sensitive to image acquisition, reconstruction, tumor segmentation, and interpolation. However, the amount of sensitivity is feature dependent, for instance, textural features were, in general, less robust than statistical features.

Conclusions

Radiomics repeatability, reproducibility, and reporting quality can substantially be improved regarding feature extraction software and settings, image preprocessing and acquisition, cutoff values for stable feature selection. Our proposed radiomics reporting checklist can serve to simplify and improve the reporting and, eventually, guarantee the possibility to fully replicate and validate radiomic studies.

18F-FMISO-PET Hypoxia Monitoring for Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients: Radiomics Analyses Predict the Outcome of Chemo-Radiotherapy

Tumor hypoxia is associated with radiation resistance and can be longitudinally monitored by 18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO)-PET/CT. Our study aimed at evaluating radiomics dynamics of 18F-FMISO-hypoxia imaging during chemo-radiotherapy (CRT) as predictors for treatment outcome in head-and-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients. We prospectively recruited 35 HNSCC patients undergoing definitive CRT and longitudinal 18F-FMISO-PET/CT scans at weeks 0, 2 and 5 (W0/W2/W5). Patients were classified based on peritherapeutic variations of the hypoxic sub-volume (HSV) size (increasing/stable/decreasing) and location (geographically-static/geographically-dynamic) by a new objective classification parameter (CP) accounting for spatial overlap. Additionally, 130 radiomic features (RF) were extracted from HSV at W0, and their variations during CRT were quantified by relative deviations (∆RF). Prediction of treatment outcome was considered statistically relevant after being corrected for multiple testing and confirmed for the two 18F-FMISO-PET/CT time-points and for a validation cohort. HSV decreased in 64% of patients at W2 and in 80% at W5. CP distinguished earlier disease progression (geographically-dynamic) from later disease progression (geographically-static) in both time-points and cohorts. The texture feature low grey-level zone emphasis predicted local recurrence with AUCW2 = 0.82 and AUCW5 = 0.81 in initial cohort (N = 25) and AUCW2 = 0.79 and AUCW5 = 0.80 in validation cohort. Radiomics analysis of 18F-FMISO-derived hypoxia dynamics was able to predict outcome of HNSCC patients after CRT.

Experimental phantom evaluation to identify robust positron emission tomography (PET) radiomic features

Background

Radiomics analysis usually involves, especially in multicenter and large hospital studies, different imaging protocols for acquisition, reconstruction, and processing of data. Differences in protocols can lead to differences in the quantification of the biomarker distribution, leading to radiomic feature variability. The aim of our study was to identify those radiomic features robust to the different degrading factors in positron emission tomography (PET) studies. We proposed the use of the standardized measurements of the European Association Research Ltd. (EARL) accreditation to retrospectively identify the radiomic features having low variability to the different systems and reconstruction protocols. In addition, we presented a reproducible procedure to identify PET radiomic features robust to PET/CT imaging metal artifacts. In 27 heterogeneous homemade phantoms for which ground truth was accurately defined by CT segmentation, we evaluated the segmentation accuracy and radiomic feature reliability given by the contrast-oriented algorithm (COA) and the 40% threshold PET segmentation. In the comparison of two data sets, robustness was defined by Wilcoxon rank tests, bias was quantified by Bland–Altman (BA) plot analysis, and strong correlations were identified by Spearman correlation test (r > 0.8 and p satisfied multiple test Bonferroni correction).

Results

Forty-eight radiomic features were robust to system, 22 to resolution, 102 to metal artifacts, and 42 to different PET segmentation tools. Overall, only 4 radiomic features were simultaneously robust to all degrading factors. Although both segmentation approaches significantly underestimated the volume with respect to the ground truth, with relative deviations of −62 ± 36% for COA and −50 ± 44% for 40%, radiomic features derived from the ground truth were strongly correlated and/or robust to 98 radiomic features derived from COA and to 102 from 40%.

Conclusion

In multicenter studies, we recommend the analysis of EARL accreditation measurements in order to retrospectively identify the robust PET radiomic features. Furthermore, 4 radiomic features (area under the curve of the cumulative SUV volume histogram, skewness, kurtosis, and gray-level variance derived from GLRLM after application of an equal probability quantization algorithm on the voxels within lesion) were robust to all degrading factors. In addition, the feasibility of 40% and COA segmentations for their use in radiomics analysis has been demonstrated.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40658-021-00390-7.

FET-PET radiomics in recurrent glioblastoma: prognostic value for outcome after re-irradiation?

Purpose

The value of O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (FET)-positron emission tomography (PET)-radiomics in the outcome assessment of patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM) has not been evaluated until now. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a prognostic model based on FET-PET radiomics features (RF) is feasible and can identify rGBM patients that would most benefit from re-irradiation.

Methods

We prospectively recruited rGBM patients who underwent FET-PET before re-irradiation (GLIAA-Pilot trial, DRKS00000633). Tumor volume was delineated using a semi-automatic method with a threshold of 1.8 times the standardized-uptake-value of the background. 135 FET-RF (histogram parameters, shape and texture features) were extracted. The analysis involved the characterization of tumor and non-tumor tissue with FET-RF and the evaluation of the prognostic value of FET-RF for time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS) and recurrence location (RL).

Results

Thirty-two rGBM patients constituted our cohort. FET-RF discriminated significantly between tumor and non-tumor. The texture feature Small-Zone-Low-Gray-Level-Emphasis (SZLGE) showed the best performance for the prediction of TTP (p = 0.001, satisfying Bonferroni-multiple-test significance level). Additionally, two radiomics signatures could predict TTP (TTP-radiomics-signature, p = 0.001) and OS (OS-radiomics-signature, p = 0.038). SZLGE and the TTP-radiomics-signature additionally predicted RL. Specifically, high values for TTP-radiomics-signature and for SZLGE indicated not only earlier progression, but also a RL within the initial FET-PET active volume.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that FET-PET radiomics could contribute to the prognostic assessment and selection of rGBM-patients benefiting from re-irradiation.

Trial registration DRKS00000633. Registered on 8th of December in 2010.

https://www.drks.de/drks_web/navigate.do?navigationId=trial.HTML&TRIAL_ID=DRKS00000633.

FDG-PET Radiomics for Response Monitoring in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Radiation Therapy

Simple Summary

In this study, we strive to identify clinically relevant image feature (IF) changes during chemoradiation in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to be able to predict tumor responses in an early stage of treatment. All patients underwent static (3D) and respiratory-gated 4D PET/CT scans before treatment and a 3D scan during or after treatment. Our proposed method rejects IF changes due to intrinsic variability such as noise, resolution and movement through breathing. The IF variability observed across 4D PET is employed as a patient individualized normalization factor to emphasize statistically relevant IF changes during treatment.

Abstract

The aim of this study is to identify clinically relevant image feature (IF) changes during chemoradiation and evaluate their efficacy in predicting treatment response. Patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were enrolled in two prospective trials (STRIPE, PET-Plan). We evaluated 48 patients who underwent static (3D) and retrospectively-respiratory-gated 4D PET/CT scans before treatment and a 3D scan during or after treatment. Our proposed method rejects IF changes due to intrinsic variability. The IF variability observed across 4D PET is employed as a patient individualized normalization factor to emphasize statistically relevant IF changes during treatment. Predictions of overall survival (OS), local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) were evaluated. From 135 IFs, only 17 satisfied the required criteria of being normally distributed across 4D PET and robust between 3D and 4D images. Changes during treatment in the area-under-the-curve of the cumulative standard-uptake-value histogram (δ_AUCCSH) within primary tumor discriminated (AUC = 0.87, Specificity = 0.78) patients with and without LR. The resulted prognostic model was validated with a different segmentation method (AUC = 0.83) and in a different patient cohort (AUC = 0.63). The quantification of tumor FDG heterogeneity by δ_AUCCSH during chemoradiation correlated with the incidence of local recurrence and might be recommended for monitoring treatment response in patients with NSCLC.

Body motion detection and correction in cardiac PET: Phantom and human studies

PURPOSE

Patient body motion during a cardiac positron emission tomography (PET) scan can severely degrade image quality. We propose and evaluate a novel method to detect, estimate, and correct body motion in cardiac PET.

METHODS

Our method consists of three key components: motion detection, motion estimation, and motion-compensated image reconstruction. For motion detection, we first divide PET list-mode data into 1-s bins and compute the center of mass (COM) of the coincidences' distribution in each bin. We then compute the covariance matrix within a 25-s sliding window over the COM signals inside the window. The sum of the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix is used to separate the list-mode data into "static" (i.e., body motion free) and "moving" (i.e. contaminated by body motion) frames. Each moving frame is further divided into a number of evenly spaced sub-frames (referred to as "sub-moving" frames), in which motion is assumed to be negligible. For motion estimation, we first reconstruct the data in each static and sub-moving frame using a rapid back-projection technique. We then select the longest static frame as the reference frame and estimate elastic motion transformations to the reference frame from all other static and sub-moving frames using nonrigid registration. For motion-compensated image reconstruction, we reconstruct all the list-mode data into a single image volume in the reference frame by incorporating the estimated motion transformations in the PET system matrix. We evaluated the performance of our approach in both phantom and human studies.

RESULTS

Visually, the motion-corrected (MC) PET images obtained using the proposed method have better quality and fewer motion artifacts than the images reconstructed without motion correction (NMC). Quantitative analysis indicates that MC yields higher myocardium to blood pool concentration ratios. MC also yields sharper myocardium than NMC.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed body motion correction method improves image quality of cardiac PET.

Radiomics in nuclear medicine: robustness, reproducibility, standardization, and how to avoid data analysis traps and replication crisis

Radiomics in nuclear medicine is rapidly expanding. Reproducibility of radiomics studies in multicentre settings is an important criterion for clinical translation. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to investigate reproducibility of radiomics biomarkers in PET imaging and to obtain quantitative information regarding their sensitivity to variations in various imaging and radiomics-related factors as well as their inherent sensitivity. Additionally, we identify and describe data analysis pitfalls that affect the reproducibility and generalizability of radiomics studies. After a systematic literature search, 42 studies were included in the qualitative synthesis, and data from 21 were used for the quantitative meta-analysis. Data concerning measurement agreement and reliability were collected for 21 of 38 different factors associated with image acquisition, reconstruction, segmentation and radiomics-specific processing steps. Variations in voxel size, segmentation and several reconstruction parameters strongly affected reproducibility, but the level of evidence remained weak. Based on the meta-analysis, we also assessed inherent sensitivity to variations of 110 PET image biomarkers. SUV_mean and SUV_max were found to be reliable, whereas image biomarkers based on the neighbourhood grey tone difference matrix and most biomarkers based on the size zone matrix were found to be highly sensitive to variations, and should be used with care in multicentre settings. Lastly, we identify 11 data analysis pitfalls. These pitfalls concern model validation and information leakage during model development, but also relate to reporting and the software used for data analysis. Avoiding such pitfalls is essential for minimizing bias in the results and to enable reproduction and validation of radiomics studies.

Radiomic features from PSMA PET for non-invasive intraprostatic tumor discrimination and characterization in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer - a comparison study with histology reference

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of radiomic features (RF) derived from PSMA PET for intraprostatic tumor discrimination and non-invasive characterization of Gleason score (GS) and pelvic lymph node status. Patients and methods: Patients with prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent [⁶⁸Ga]-PSMA-11 PET/CT followed by radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection were prospectively enrolled (n=20). Coregistered histopathological gross tumor volume (GTV-Histo) in the prostate served as reference. 133 RF were derived from GTV-Histo and from manually created segmentations of the intraprostatic tumor volume (GTV-Exp). Spearman´s correlation coefficients (ρ) were assessed between RF derived from the different GTVs. We additionally analyzed the differences in RF values for PCa and non-PCa tissues. Furthermore, areas under receiver-operating characteristics curves (AUC) were calculated and uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the RF based discrimination of GS 7 and ≥8 disease and of patients with nodal spread (pN1) and non-nodal spread (pN0) in surgical specimen. The results found in the latter analyses were validated by a retrospective cohort of 40 patients. Results: Most RF from GTV-Exp showed strong correlations with RF from GTV-Histo (86% with ρ>0.7). 81% and 76% of RF from GTV-Exp and GTV-Histo significantly discriminated between PCa and non-PCa tissue. The texture feature QSZHGE discriminated between GS 7 and ≥8 considering GTV-Histo (AUC=0.93) and GTV-Exp (prospective cohort: AUC=0.91 / validation cohort: AUC=0.84). QSZHGE also discriminated between pN1 and pN0 disease considering GTV-Histo (AUC=0.85) and GTV-Exp (prospective cohort: AUC=0.87 / validation cohort: AUC=0.85). In uni- and multivariate analyses including patients of both cohorts QSZHGE was a statistically significant (p<0.01) predictor for PCa patients with GS ≥8 tumors and pN1 status. Conclusion: RF derived from PSMA PET discriminated between PCa and non-PCa tissue within the prostate. Additionally, the texture feature QSZHGE discriminated between GS 7 and GS ≥8 tumors and between patients with pN1 and pN0 disease. Our results support the role of RF in PSMA PET as a new tool for non-invasive PCa discrimination and characterization of its biological properties.

The Applications of Radiomics in Precision Diagnosis and Treatment of Oncology: Opportunities and Challenges

Medical imaging can assess the tumor and its environment in their entirety, which makes it suitable for monitoring the temporal and spatial characteristics of the tumor. Progress in computational methods, especially in artificial intelligence for medical image process and analysis, has converted these images into quantitative and minable data associated with clinical events in oncology management. This concept was first described as radiomics in 2012. Since then, computer scientists, radiologists, and oncologists have gravitated towards this new tool and exploited advanced methodologies to mine the information behind medical images. On the basis of a great quantity of radiographic images and novel computational technologies, researchers developed and validated radiomic models that may improve the accuracy of diagnoses and therapy response assessments. Here, we review the recent methodological developments in radiomics, including data acquisition, tumor segmentation, feature extraction, and modelling, as well as the rapidly developing deep learning technology. Moreover, we outline the main applications of radiomics in diagnosis, treatment planning and evaluations in the field of oncology with the aim of developing quantitative and personalized medicine. Finally, we discuss the challenges in the field of radiomics and the scope and clinical applicability of these methods.

Radiomics in Nuclear Medicine Applied to Radiation Therapy: Methods, Pitfalls, and Challenges

Radiomics is a recent area of research in precision medicine and is based on the extraction of a large variety of features from medical images. In the field of radiation oncology, comprehensive image analysis is crucial to personalization of treatments. A better characterization of local heterogeneity and the shape of the tumor, depicting individual cancer aggressiveness, could guide dose planning and suggest volumes in which a higher dose is needed for better tumor control. In addition, noninvasive imaging features that could predict treatment outcome from baseline scans could help the radiation oncologist to determine the best treatment strategies and to stratify patients as at low risk or high risk of recurrence. Nuclear medicine molecular imaging reflects information regarding biological processes in the tumor thanks to a wide range of radiotracers. Many studies involving ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography suggest an added value of radiomics compared with the use of conventional PET metrics such as standardized uptake value for both tumor diagnosis and prediction of recurrence or treatment outcome. However, these promising results should not hide technical difficulties that still currently prevent the approach from being widely studied or clinically used. These difficulties mostly pertain to the variability of the imaging features as a function of the acquisition device and protocol, the robustness of the models with respect to that variability, and the interpretation of the radiomic models. Addressing the impact of the variability in acquisition and reconstruction protocols is needed, as is harmonizing the radiomic feature calculation methods, to ensure the reproducibility of studies in a multicenter context and their implementation in a clinical workflow. In this review, we explain the potential impact of positron emission tomography radiomics for radiation therapy and underline the various aspects that need to be carefully addressed to make the most of this promising approach.