1
|
Gao Y, Kyun Park Y, Jia X. Human-like intelligent automatic treatment planning of head and neck cancer radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:115049. [PMID: 38744304 PMCID: PMC11148880 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4b90] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Automatic treatment planning of radiation therapy (RT) is desired to ensure plan quality, improve planning efficiency, and reduce human errors. We have proposed an Intelligent Automatic Treatment Planning framework with a virtual treatment planner (VTP), an artificial intelligence robot built using deep reinforcement learning, autonomously operating a treatment planning system (TPS). This study extends our previous successes in relatively simple prostate cancer RT planning to head-and-neck (H&N) cancer, a more challenging context even for human planners due to multiple prescription levels, proximity of targets to critical organs, and tight dosimetric constraints.Approach.We integrated VTP with a real clinical TPS to establish a fully automated planning workflow guided by VTP. This integration allowed direct model training and evaluation using the clinical TPS. We designed the VTP network structure to approach the decision-making process in RT planning in a hierarchical manner that mirrors human planners. The VTP network was trained via theQ-learning framework. To assess the effectiveness of VTP, we conducted a prospective evaluation in the 2023 Planning Challenge organized by the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists (AAMD). We extended our evaluation to include 20 clinical H&N cancer patients, comparing the plans generated by VTP against their clinical plans.Main results.In the prospective evaluation for the AAMD Planning Challenge, VTP achieved a plan score of 139.08 in the initial phase evaluating plan quality, and 15 min of planning time with the first place ranking in the adaptive phase competing for planning efficiency while meeting all plan quality requirements. For clinical cases, VTP-generated plans achieved an average VTP score of125.33±11.12, which outperformed the corresponding clinical plans with an average score of117.76±13.56.Significance.We successfully integrated VTP with the clinical TPS to achieve a fully automated treatment planning workflow. The compelling performance of VTP demonstrated its potential in automating H&N cancer RT planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yin Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Yang Kyun Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Xun Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Giannitto C, Carnicelli G, Lusi S, Ammirabile A, Casiraghi E, De Virgilio A, Esposito AA, Farina D, Ferreli F, Franzese C, Frigerio GM, Lo Casto A, Malvezzi L, Lorini L, Othman AE, Preda L, Scorsetti M, Bossi P, Mercante G, Spriano G, Balzarini L, Francone M. The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Head and Neck Cancers: A Multidisciplinary Survey. J Pers Med 2024; 14:341. [PMID: 38672968 PMCID: PMC11050769 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14040341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) approaches have been introduced in various disciplines but remain rather unused in head and neck (H&N) cancers. This survey aimed to infer the current applications of and attitudes toward AI in the multidisciplinary care of H&N cancers. From November 2020 to June 2022, a web-based questionnaire examining the relationship between AI usage and professionals' demographics and attitudes was delivered to different professionals involved in H&N cancers through social media and mailing lists. A total of 139 professionals completed the questionnaire. Only 49.7% of the respondents reported having experience with AI. The most frequent AI users were radiologists (66.2%). Significant predictors of AI use were primary specialty (V = 0.455; p < 0.001), academic qualification and age. AI's potential was seen in the improvement of diagnostic accuracy (72%), surgical planning (64.7%), treatment selection (57.6%), risk assessment (50.4%) and the prediction of complications (45.3%). Among participants, 42.7% had significant concerns over AI use, with the most frequent being the 'loss of control' (27.6%) and 'diagnostic errors' (57.0%). This survey reveals limited engagement with AI in multidisciplinary H&N cancer care, highlighting the need for broader implementation and further studies to explore its acceptance and benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caterina Giannitto
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgia Carnicelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Lusi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Angela Ammirabile
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Elena Casiraghi
- Department of Computer Science “Giovanni degli Antoni”, University of Milan, Via Celoria 18, 20133 Milan, Italy;
- Environmental Genomics and Systems Biology Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 717 Potter Street, Berkeley, CA 94710, USA
| | - Armando De Virgilio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Davide Farina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health, University of Brescia ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy;
| | - Fabio Ferreli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ciro Franzese
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Gian Marco Frigerio
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Antonio Lo Casto
- Department of Biomedicine, Neuroscience and Advanced Diagnostics (BIND), University Hospital of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Luca Malvezzi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luigi Lorini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Medical Oncology and Hematology Unit IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Ahmed E. Othman
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany;
| | - Lorenzo Preda
- Radiology Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Bossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Mercante
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Spriano
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Otorhinolaryngology Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Balzarini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Francone
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, 20072 Milan, Italy (G.M.F.); (L.L.); (P.B.)
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Via Manzoni 56, 20089 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shao Y, Guo J, Wang J, Huang Y, Gan W, Zhang X, Wu G, Sun D, Gu Y, Gu Q, Yue NJ, Yang G, Xie G, Xu Z. Novel in-house knowledge-based automated planning system for lung cancer treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2023:10.1007/s00066-023-02126-1. [PMID: 37603050 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02126-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The goal of this study was to propose a knowledge-based planning system which could automatically design plans for lung cancer patients treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS From May 2018 to June 2020, 612 IMRT treatment plans of lung cancer patients were retrospectively selected to construct a planning database. Knowledge-based planning (KBP) architecture named αDiar was proposed in this study. It consisted of two parts separated by a firewall. One was the in-hospital workstation, and the other was the search engine in the cloud. Based on our previous study, A‑Net in the in-hospital workstation was used to generate predicted virtual dose images. A search engine including a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) was constructed to derive the feature vectors of dose images. By comparing the similarity of the features between virtual dose images and the clinical dose images in the database, the most similar feature was found. The optimization parameters (OPs) of the treatment plan corresponding to the most similar feature were assigned to the new plan, and the design of a new treatment plan was automatically completed. After αDiar was developed, we performed two studies. The first retrospective study was conducted to validate whether this architecture was qualified for clinical practice and involved 96 patients. The second comparative study was performed to investigate whether αDiar could assist dosimetrists in improving the quality of planning for the patients. Two dosimetrists were involved and designed plans for only one trial with and without αDiar; 26 patients were involved in this study. RESULTS The first study showed that about 54% (52/96) of the automatically generated plans would achieve the dosimetric constraints of the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) and about 93% (89/96) of the automatically generated plans would achieve the dosimetric constraints of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). The second study showed that the quality of treatment planning designed by junior dosimetrists was improved with the help of αDiar. CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that αDiar was an effective tool to improve planning quality. Over half of the patients' plans could be designed automatically. For the remaining patients, although the automatically designed plans did not fully meet the clinical requirements, their quality was also better than that of manual plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Shao
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jindong Guo
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiyong Wang
- Shanghai Pulse Medical Technology Inc., Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Huang
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Wutian Gan
- School of Physics and Technology, University of Wuhan, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoying Zhang
- School of Information Science and Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Ge Wu
- Ping An Healthcare Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China
| | - Dong Sun
- School of Biomedical Engineering, Health Science Center, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, China
| | - Yu Gu
- School of Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Qingtao Gu
- School of Medicine and Biological Information Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
| | - Ning Jeff Yue
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | - Guanli Yang
- Radiotherapy Department, Shandong Second Provincial General Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
| | - Guotong Xie
- Ping An Healthcare Technology Co. Ltd., Shanghai, China.
- Ping An Health Cloud Company Limited, Shanghai, China.
- Ping An International Smart City Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhiyong Xu
- Shanghai Chest Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kallis K, Moore LC, Cortes KG, Brown D, Mayadev J, Moore KL, Meyers SM. Automated treatment planning framework for brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D dose predictions. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/acc37c. [PMID: 36898161 PMCID: PMC10101723 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc37c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To lay the foundation for automated knowledge-based brachytherapy treatment planning using 3D dose estimations, we describe an optimization framework to convert brachytherapy dose distributions directly into dwell times (DTs).Approach. A dose rate kernelḋ(r,θ,φ)was produced by exporting 3D dose for one dwell position from the treatment planning system and normalizing by DT. By translating and rotating this kernel to each dwell position, scaling by DT and summing over all dwell positions, dose was computed (Dcalc). We used a Python-coded COBYLA optimizer to iteratively determine the DTs that minimize the mean squared error betweenDcalcand reference doseDref, computed using voxels withDref80%-120% of prescription. As validation of the optimization, we showed that the optimizer replicates clinical plans whenDref= clinical dose in 40 patients treated with tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) or tandem-and-ring (T&R) and 0-3 needles. Then we demonstrated automated planning in 10 T&O usingDref= dose predicted from a convolutional neural network developed in past work. Validation and automated plans were compared to clinical plans using mean absolute differences (MAD=1N∑n=1Nabsxn-xn') over all voxels (xn= Dose,N= #voxels) and DTs (xn= DT,N= #dwell positions), mean differences (MD) in organD2ccand high-risk CTV D90 over all patients (where positive indicates higher clinical dose), and mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for 100% isodose contours.Main results. Validation plans agreed well with clinical plans (MADdose= 1.1%, MADDT= 4 s or 0.8% of total plan time,D2ccMD = -0.2% to 0.2% and D90 MD = -0.6%, DSC = 0.99). For automated plans, MADdose= 6.5% and MADDT= 10.3 s (2.1%). The slightly higher clinical metrics in automated plans (D2ccMD = -3.8% to 1.3% and D90 MD = -5.1%) were due to higher neural network dose predictions. The overall shape of the automated dose distributions were similar to clinical doses (DSC = 0.91).Significance. Automated planning with 3D dose predictions could provide significant time savings and standardize treatment planning across practitioners, regardless of experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Lance C Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Katherina G Cortes
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Derek Brown
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anetai Y, Takegawa H, Koike Y, Nakamura S, Tanigawa N. Effective optimization strategy for large optimization volume object, remaining volume at risk (RVR): α-value selection and usage from generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) curve deviation perspective. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36745933 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acb989] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Objective.A large optimization volume for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), such as the remaining volume at risk (RVR), is traditionally unsuitable for dose-volume constraint control and requires planner-specific empirical considerations owing to the patient-specific shape. To enable less empirical optimization, the generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) optimization is effective; however, the utilization of parametera-values remains elusive. Our study clarifies thea-value characteristics for optimization and to enable effectivea-value use.Approach.The gEUD can be obtained as a function of itsa-value, which is the weighted generalized mean; its curve has a continuous, differentiable, and sigmoid shape, deforming in its optimization state with retained curve characteristics. Using differential geometry, the gEUD curve changes in optimization is considered a geodesic deviation intervened by the forces between deforming and retaining the curve. The curvature and gradient of the curve are radically related to optimization. The vertex point (a=ak) was set and thea-value roles were classified into the following three parts of the curve with respect to thea-value: (i) high gradient and middle curvature, (ii) middle gradient and high curvature, and (iii) low gradient and low curvature. Then, a strategy for multiplea-values was then identified using RVR optimization.Main results.Eleven head and neck patients who underwent static seven-field IMRT were used to verify thea-value characteristics and curvature effect for optimization. The lowera-value (i) (a= 1-3) optimization was effective for the whole dose-volume range; in contrast, the effect of highera-value (iii) (a= 12-20) optimization addressed strongly the high-dose range of the dose volume. The middlea-value (ii) (arounda=ak) showed intermediate but effective high-to-low dose reduction. Thesea-value characteristics were observed as superimpositions in the optimization. Thus, multiple gEUD-based optimization was significantly superior to the exponential constraints normally applied to the RVR that surrounds the PTV, normal tissue objective (NTO), resulting in up to 25.9% and 8.1% improvement in dose-volume indices D2% and V10Gy, respectively.Significance.This study revealed an appropriatea-value for gEUD optimization, leading to favorable dose-volume optimization for the RVR region using fixed multiplea-value conditions, despite the very large and patient-specific shape of the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuke Anetai
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Shin-machi 2-5-1, Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1010, Japan
| | - Hideki Takegawa
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Shin-machi 2-5-1, Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1010, Japan
| | - Yuhei Koike
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Shin-machi 2-5-1, Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1010, Japan
| | - Satoaki Nakamura
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Shin-machi 2-5-1, Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1010, Japan
| | - Noboru Tanigawa
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Shin-machi 2-5-1, Hirakata-shi, Osaka 573-1010, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Osuala R, Kushibar K, Garrucho L, Linardos A, Szafranowska Z, Klein S, Glocker B, Diaz O, Lekadir K. Data synthesis and adversarial networks: A review and meta-analysis in cancer imaging. Med Image Anal 2023; 84:102704. [PMID: 36473414 DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2022.102704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2021] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Despite technological and medical advances, the detection, interpretation, and treatment of cancer based on imaging data continue to pose significant challenges. These include inter-observer variability, class imbalance, dataset shifts, inter- and intra-tumour heterogeneity, malignancy determination, and treatment effect uncertainty. Given the recent advancements in image synthesis, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and adversarial training, we assess the potential of these technologies to address a number of key challenges of cancer imaging. We categorise these challenges into (a) data scarcity and imbalance, (b) data access and privacy, (c) data annotation and segmentation, (d) cancer detection and diagnosis, and (e) tumour profiling, treatment planning and monitoring. Based on our analysis of 164 publications that apply adversarial training techniques in the context of cancer imaging, we highlight multiple underexplored solutions with research potential. We further contribute the Synthesis Study Trustworthiness Test (SynTRUST), a meta-analysis framework for assessing the validation rigour of medical image synthesis studies. SynTRUST is based on 26 concrete measures of thoroughness, reproducibility, usefulness, scalability, and tenability. Based on SynTRUST, we analyse 16 of the most promising cancer imaging challenge solutions and observe a high validation rigour in general, but also several desirable improvements. With this work, we strive to bridge the gap between the needs of the clinical cancer imaging community and the current and prospective research on data synthesis and adversarial networks in the artificial intelligence community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Osuala
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Kaisar Kushibar
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lidia Garrucho
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Akis Linardos
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Zuzanna Szafranowska
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefan Klein
- Biomedical Imaging Group Rotterdam, Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ben Glocker
- Biomedical Image Analysis Group, Department of Computing, Imperial College London, UK
| | - Oliver Diaz
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| | - Karim Lekadir
- Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Lab (BCN-AIM), Facultat de Matemàtiques i Informàtica, Universitat de Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Babier A, Mahmood R, Zhang B, Alves VGL, Barragán-Montero AM, Beaudry J, Cardenas CE, Chang Y, Chen Z, Chun J, Diaz K, Eraso HD, Faustmann E, Gaj S, Gay S, Gronberg M, Guo B, He J, Heilemann G, Hira S, Huang Y, Ji F, Jiang D, Giraldo JCJ, Lee H, Lian J, Liu S, Liu KC, Marrugo J, Miki K, Nakamura K, Netherton T, Nguyen D, Nourzadeh H, Osman AFI, Peng Z, Muñoz JDQ, Ramsl C, Rhee DJ, Rodriguez JD, Shan H, Siebers JV, Soomro MH, Sun K, Hoyos AU, Valderrama C, Verbeek R, Wang E, Willems S, Wu Q, Xu X, Yang S, Yuan L, Zhu S, Zimmermann L, Moore KL, Purdie TG, McNiven AL, Chan TCY. OpenKBP-Opt: an international and reproducible evaluation of 76 knowledge-based planning pipelines. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac8044. [PMID: 36093921 PMCID: PMC10696540 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac8044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Objective.To establish an open framework for developing plan optimization models for knowledge-based planning (KBP).Approach.Our framework includes radiotherapy treatment data (i.e. reference plans) for 100 patients with head-and-neck cancer who were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. That data also includes high-quality dose predictions from 19 KBP models that were developed by different research groups using out-of-sample data during the OpenKBP Grand Challenge. The dose predictions were input to four fluence-based dose mimicking models to form 76 unique KBP pipelines that generated 7600 plans (76 pipelines × 100 patients). The predictions and KBP-generated plans were compared to the reference plans via: the dose score, which is the average mean absolute voxel-by-voxel difference in dose; the deviation in dose-volume histogram (DVH) points; and the frequency of clinical planning criteria satisfaction. We also performed a theoretical investigation to justify our dose mimicking models.Main results.The range in rank order correlation of the dose score between predictions and their KBP pipelines was 0.50-0.62, which indicates that the quality of the predictions was generally positively correlated with the quality of the plans. Additionally, compared to the input predictions, the KBP-generated plans performed significantly better (P< 0.05; one-sided Wilcoxon test) on 18 of 23 DVH points. Similarly, each optimization model generated plans that satisfied a higher percentage of criteria than the reference plans, which satisfied 3.5% more criteria than the set of all dose predictions. Lastly, our theoretical investigation demonstrated that the dose mimicking models generated plans that are also optimal for an inverse planning model.Significance.This was the largest international effort to date for evaluating the combination of KBP prediction and optimization models. We found that the best performing models significantly outperformed the reference dose and dose predictions. In the interest of reproducibility, our data and code is freely available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Babier
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rafid Mahmood
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Binghao Zhang
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Victor G L Alves
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | | | - Joel Beaudry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Carlos E Cardenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Yankui Chang
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zijie Chen
- Shenying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jaehee Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kelly Diaz
- Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Harold David Eraso
- Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Erik Faustmann
- Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sibaji Gaj
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Skylar Gay
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Mary Gronberg
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Bingqi Guo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Junjun He
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Gerd Heilemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Sanchit Hira
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America
| | - Yuliang Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fuxin Ji
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Dashan Jiang
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Hoyeon Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Jun Lian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Shuolin Liu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Keng-Chi Liu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Taiwan AI Labs, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - José Marrugo
- Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Kentaro Miki
- Department Of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kunio Nakamura
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States of America
| | - Tucker Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Dan Nguyen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation (MAIA) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States of America
| | - Hamidreza Nourzadeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America
| | | | - Zhao Peng
- Department of Engineering and Applied Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | | | - Christian Ramsl
- Atominstitut, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dong Joo Rhee
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | | | - Hongming Shan
- Institute of Science and Technology for Brain-inspired Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jeffrey V Siebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Mumtaz H Soomro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America
| | - Kay Sun
- Studio Vodels, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Andrés Usuga Hoyos
- Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Carlos Valderrama
- Department of Physics, National University of Colombia, Medellín, Colombia
| | - Rob Verbeek
- Department Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland
| | - Enpei Wang
- Shenying Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Siri Willems
- Department of Electrical Engineering, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Qi Wu
- Department of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Anhui University, Hefei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xuanang Xu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, United States of America
| | - Sen Yang
- Tencent AI Lab, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China
| | - Lulin Yuan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA, United States of America
| | - Simeng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, United States of America
| | - Lukas Zimmermann
- Faculty of Health, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Competence Center for Preclinical Imaging and Biomedical Engineering, University of Applied Sciences Wiener Neustadt, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Thomas G Purdie
- Radiation Medicine Program, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Techna Institute for the Advancement of Technology for Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea L McNiven
- Radiation Medicine Program, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Timothy C Y Chan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Vector Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Techna Institute for the Advancement of Technology for Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Osman AFI, Tamam NM. Attention-aware 3D U-Net convolutional neural network for knowledge-based planning 3D dose distribution prediction of head-and-neck cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13630. [PMID: 35533234 PMCID: PMC9278691 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Deep learning-based knowledge-based planning (KBP) methods have been introduced for radiotherapy dose distribution prediction to reduce the planning time and maintain consistent high-quality plans. This paper presents a novel KBP model using an attention-gating mechanism and a three-dimensional (3D) U-Net for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) 3D dose distribution prediction in head-and-neck cancer. METHODS A total of 340 head-and-neck cancer plans, representing the OpenKBP-2020 AAPM Grand Challenge data set, were used in this study. All patients were treated with the IMRT technique and a dose prescription of 70 Gy. The data set was randomly divided into 64%/16%/20% as training/validation/testing cohorts. An attention-gated 3D U-Net architecture model was developed to predict full 3D dose distribution. The developed model was trained using the mean-squared error loss function, Adam optimization algorithm, a learning rate of 0.001, 120 epochs, and batch size of 4. In addition, a baseline U-Net model was also similarly trained for comparison. The model performance was evaluated on the testing data set by comparing the generated dose distributions against the ground-truth dose distributions using dose statistics and clinical dosimetric indices. Its performance was also compared to the baseline model and the reported results of other deep learning-based dose prediction models. RESULTS The proposed attention-gated 3D U-Net model showed high capability in accurately predicting 3D dose distributions that closely replicated the ground-truth dose distributions of 68 plans in the test set. The average value of the mean absolute dose error was 2.972 ± 1.220 Gy (vs. 2.920 ± 1.476 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the brainstem, 4.243 ± 1.791 Gy (vs. 4.530 ± 2.295 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the left parotid, 4.622 ± 1.975 Gy (vs. 4.223 ± 1.816 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the right parotid, 3.346 ± 1.198 Gy (vs. 2.958 ± 0.888 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the spinal cord, 6.582 ± 3.748 Gy (vs. 5.114 ± 2.098 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the esophagus, 4.756 ± 1.560 Gy (vs. 4.992 ± 2.030 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the mandible, 4.501 ± 1.784 Gy (vs. 4.925 ± 2.347 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the larynx, 2.494 ± 0.953 Gy (vs. 2.648 ± 1.247 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the PTV_70, and 2.432 ± 2.272 Gy (vs. 2.811 ± 2.896 Gy for a baseline U-Net) in the body contour. The average difference in predicting the D99 value for the targets (PTV_70, PTV_63, and PTV_56) was 2.50 ± 1.77 Gy. For the organs at risk, the average difference in predicting the D m a x ${D_{max}}$ (brainstem, spinal cord, and mandible) and D m e a n ${D_{mean}}$ (left parotid, right parotid, esophagus, and larynx) values was 1.43 ± 1.01 and 2.44 ± 1.73 Gy, respectively. The average value of the homogeneity index was 7.99 ± 1.45 for the predicted plans versus 5.74 ± 2.95 for the ground-truth plans, whereas the average value of the conformity index was 0.63 ± 0.17 for the predicted plans versus 0.89 ± 0.19 for the ground-truth plans. The proposed model needs less than 5 s to predict a full 3D dose distribution of 64 × 64 × 64 voxels for a new patient that is sufficient for real-time applications. CONCLUSIONS The attention-gated 3D U-Net model demonstrated a capability in predicting accurate 3D dose distributions for head-and-neck IMRT plans with consistent quality. The prediction performance of the proposed model was overall superior to a baseline standard U-Net model, and it was also competitive to the performance of the best state-of-the-art dose prediction method reported in the literature. The proposed model could be used to obtain dose distributions for decision-making before planning, quality assurance of planning, and guiding-automated planning for improved plan consistency, quality, and planning efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nissren M Tamam
- Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Maass K, Aravkin A, Kim M. A hyperparameter-tuning approach to automated inverse planning. Med Phys 2022; 49:3405-3415. [PMID: 35218033 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In current practice, radiotherapy inverse planning often requires treatment planners to modify multiple parameters in the treatment planning system's objective function to produce clinically acceptable plans. Due to the manual steps in this process, plan quality can vary depending on the planning time available and the planner's skills. PURPOSE This study investigates the feasibility of two hyperparameter-tuning methods for automated inverse planning. Because this framework does not train a model on previously-optimized plans, it can be readily adapted to practice pattern changes, and the resulting plan quality is not limited by that of a training cohort. METHODS We retrospectively selected 10 patients who received lung stereotactic body radiation therapy using manually-generated clinical plans. We implemented random sampling and Bayesian optimization to automatically tune objective function parameters using linear-quadratic utility functions based on 11 clinical goals. Normalizing all plans to deliver a minimum dose of 48 Gy to 95% of the planning target volume, we compared plan quality for the automatically-generated plans to the manually-generated plans. We also investigated the impact of iteration count on the automatically-generated plans, comparing planning time and plan utility for randomized and Bayesian plans with and without stopping criteria. RESULTS Without stopping criteria, the median planning time was 1.9 and 2.3 hours for randomized and Bayesian plans, respectively. The organ-at-risk doses in the randomized and Bayesian plans had a median percent difference (MPD) of 48.7% and 60.4% below clinical dose limits and an MPD of 2.8% and 3.3% below clinical plan doses. With stopping criteria, the utility decreased by an MPD of 5.3% and 3.9% for randomized and Bayesian plans, but the median planning time was reduced to 0.5 and 0.7 hours, and the organ-at-risk doses still had an MPD of 42.9% and 49.7% below clinical dose limits and an MPD of 0.3% and 1.8% below clinical plan doses. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that hyperparameter-tuning approaches to automated inverse planning can reduce the treatment planner's active planning time with plan quality that is similar to or better than manually-generated plans. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Maass
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - A Aravkin
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| | - M Kim
- University of Washington, Seattle WA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kneepkens E, Bakx N, van der Sangen M, Theuws J, van der Toorn PP, Rijkaart D, van der Leer J, van Nunen T, Hagelaar E, Bluemink H, Hurkmans C. Clinical evaluation of two AI models for automated breast cancer plan generation. Radiat Oncol 2022; 17:25. [PMID: 35123517 PMCID: PMC8817521 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-01993-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Artificial intelligence (AI) shows great potential to streamline the treatment planning process. However, its clinical adoption is slow due to the limited number of clinical evaluation studies and because often, the translation of the predicted dose distribution to a deliverable plan is lacking. This study evaluates two different, deliverable AI plans in terms of their clinical acceptability based on quantitative parameters and qualitative evaluation by four radiation oncologists. Methods For 20 left-sided node-negative breast cancer patients, treated with a prescribed dose of 40.05 Gy, using tangential beam intensity modulated radiotherapy, two model-based treatment plans were evaluated against the corresponding manual plan. The two models used were an in-house developed U-net model and a vendor-developed contextual atlas regression forest model (cARF). Radiation oncologists evaluated the clinical acceptability of each blinded plan and ranked plans according to preference. Furthermore, a comparison with the manual plan was made based on dose volume histogram parameters, clinical evaluation criteria and preparation time. Results The U-net model resulted in a higher average and maximum dose to the PTV (median difference 0.37 Gy and 0.47 Gy respectively) and a slightly higher mean heart dose (MHD) (0.01 Gy). The cARF model led to higher average and maximum doses to the PTV (0.30 and 0.39 Gy respectively) and a slightly higher MHD (0.02 Gy) and mean lung dose (MLD, 0.04 Gy). The maximum MHD/MLD difference was ≤ 0.5 Gy for both AI plans. Regardless of these dose differences, 90–95% of the AI plans were considered clinically acceptable versus 90% of the manual plans. Preferences varied between the radiation oncologists. Plan preparation time was comparable between the U-net model and the manual plan (287 s vs 253 s) while the cARF model took longer (471 s). When only considering user interaction, plan generation time was 121 s for the cARF model and 137 s for the U-net model. Conclusions Two AI models were used to generate deliverable plans for breast cancer patients, in a time-efficient manner, requiring minimal user interaction. Although the AI plans resulted in slightly higher doses overall, radiation oncologists considered 90–95% of the AI plans clinically acceptable. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13014-022-01993-9.
Collapse
|
11
|
Singh P, Tripathi S, Gupta S. A unified approach for optimal dose delivery and trajectory optimization for the treatment of prostate cancer. Biomed Signal Process Control 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bspc.2021.102884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
12
|
Babier A, Zhang B, Mahmood R, Moore KL, Purdie TG, McNiven AL, Chan TCY. OpenKBP: The open-access knowledge-based planning grand challenge and dataset. Med Phys 2021; 48:5549-5561. [PMID: 34156719 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2020] [Revised: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To advance fair and consistent comparisons of dose prediction methods for knowledge-based planning (KBP) in radiation therapy research. METHODS We hosted OpenKBP, a 2020 AAPM Grand Challenge, and challenged participants to develop the best method for predicting the dose of contoured computed tomography (CT) images. The models were evaluated according to two separate scores: (a) dose score, which evaluates the full three-dimensional (3D) dose distributions, and (b) dose-volume histogram (DVH) score, which evaluates a set DVH metrics. We used these scores to quantify the quality of the models based on their out-of-sample predictions. To develop and test their models, participants were given the data of 340 patients who were treated for head-and-neck cancer with radiation therapy. The data were partitioned into training ( n = 200 ), validation ( n = 40 ), and testing ( n = 100 ) datasets. All participants performed training and validation with the corresponding datasets during the first (validation) phase of the Challenge. In the second (testing) phase, the participants used their model on the testing data to quantify the out-of-sample performance, which was hidden from participants and used to determine the final competition ranking. Participants also responded to a survey to summarize their models. RESULTS The Challenge attracted 195 participants from 28 countries, and 73 of those participants formed 44 teams in the validation phase, which received a total of 1750 submissions. The testing phase garnered submissions from 28 of those teams, which represents 28 unique prediction methods. On average, over the course of the validation phase, participants improved the dose and DVH scores of their models by a factor of 2.7 and 5.7, respectively. In the testing phase one model achieved the best dose score (2.429) and DVH score (1.478), which were both significantly better than the dose score (2.564) and the DVH score (1.529) that was achieved by the runner-up models. Lastly, many of the top performing teams reported that they used generalizable techniques (e.g., ensembles) to achieve higher performance than their competition. CONCLUSION OpenKBP is the first competition for knowledge-based planning research. The Challenge helped launch the first platform that enables researchers to compare KBP prediction methods fairly and consistently using a large open-source dataset and standardized metrics. OpenKBP has also democratized KBP research by making it accessible to everyone, which should help accelerate the progress of KBP research. The OpenKBP datasets are available publicly to help benchmark future KBP research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Babier
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Binghao Zhang
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Rafid Mahmood
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G8, Canada
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences Drive, La Jolla, CA, 92104, USA
| | - Thomas G Purdie
- Radiation Medicine Program, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University of Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5T 2M9, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 148 - 150 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3S2, Canada
| | - Andrea L McNiven
- Radiation Medicine Program, UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, 610 University of Avenue, Toronto, ON, M5T 2M9, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 148 - 150 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3S2, Canada
| | - Timothy C Y Chan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, ON, M5S 3G8, Canada.,Techna Institute for the Advancement of Technology for Health, 124 - 100 College Street Toronto, ON, M5G 1P5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Deep learning dose prediction for IMRT of esophageal cancer: The effect of data quality and quantity on model performance. Phys Med 2021; 83:52-63. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.02.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
|
14
|
Using fuzzy logics to determine optimal oversampling factor for voxelizing 3D surfaces in radiation therapy. Soft comput 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s00500-020-05126-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
15
|
Ma L, Chen M, Gu X, Lu W. Deep learning-based inverse mapping for fluence map prediction. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:10.1088/1361-6560/abc12c. [PMID: 33053515 PMCID: PMC8044255 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abc12c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We developed a fluence map prediction method that directly generates fluence maps for a given desired dose distribution without optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) planning. The prediction consists of two steps. First, projections of the desired dose are calculated and then inversely mapped to fluence maps in the phantom geometry by a deep neural network. Second, a plan scaling technique is applied to scale fluence maps from phantom to patient geometry. We evaluated the performance of the proposed fluence map prediction method for 102 head and neck (H&N) and 14 prostate cancer VMAT plans by comparing the patient doses calculated from the predicted fluence maps with the given desired dose distributions. The mean dose differences were 1.42% ± 0.37%, 1.53% ± 0.44% and 1.25% ± 0.44% for the planning target volume (PTV), the region from the PTV boundary to the 50% isodose line, and the region from the 50% to the 20% isodose line, respectively. The gamma passing rate was 98.06% ± 2.64% with the 3 mm/3% criterion. The prediction time for a single VMAT plan was less than one second. In conclusion, we developed an inverse mapping-based method that predicts fluence maps for desired dose distributions with high accuracy. Our method is effectively an optimization-free inverse planning approach, which was orders of magnitude faster than fluence map optimization. Combining the proposed method with leaf sequencing has the potential to dramatically speed up VMAT treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lin Ma
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Mingli Chen
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Xuejun Gu
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| | - Weiguo Lu
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 2280 Inwood Rd, Dallas, TX 75390, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lan Y, Li F, Li Z, Yue B, Zhang Y. Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning system considering postmodulation factors. COMPLEX INTELL SYST 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s40747-020-00207-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
AbstractThe model and algorithm of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) are updated increasingly quickly, but the hardware upgrade of primary hospitals often lags behind. The new generation of intelligent precise radiotherapy platforms provides users with intelligent medical consortium services using big data, artificial intelligence and industrial Internet of Things technology. This technology can ensure that under the real-time guidance of a professional medical consortium, primary hospitals can realize rapid large-scale reverse planning design and can more accurately consider many factors of postprocessing. Although large-scale healthcare systems, such as volumetric-modulated arc therapy and other accurate radiotherapy technologies, have developed rapidly, the development of step-and-shoot-mode IMRT technology is still very important for developing countries. For software, in addition to the conformity of the dose distribution, the modulation speed, convenience and stability of the later dose delivery should also be considered in inverse planning. Therefore, this paper analyzes the main problems in conventional IMRT inverse planning, including the smoothing of the fluence map, the selection of the gantry angle and the dose leakage of tongue–groove effects. To address these issues, a novel Intelligent IoT-based large-scale inverse planning strategy with the key factors of the postmodulation is developed, and a detailed flow chart is also provided. The scheme consists of two steps. The first step is to obtain a relatively optimal combination of gantry angles by considering the dose distribution requirements and constraints and the modulation requirements and constraints. The second step is to optimize the intensity map, to smooth the map based on prior knowledge according to the determined angles, and to obtain the final modulation scheme according to the relevant objectives and constraints of the map decomposition (leaf sequencing). In an experiment, we calculate and validate the clinical head and neck case. Because of the special gantry angle selection, the angle combination is optimized from the initial equivalent distribution to adapt to the target area and protect the nontarget area. The value of the objective function varies greatly after the optimization, especially in the target area, and the target value decreases by approximately 10%. On this basis, we smooth the fluence map by a partial differential equation with prior knowledge and a minimization of the total number of monitor units. It is also shown from the objective function value that the target value is essentially unchanged for the target area, while for the nontarget area, the value decreases by 16%, which is very impressive.
Collapse
|
17
|
Babier A, Mahmood R, McNiven AL, Diamant A, Chan TC. The importance of evaluating the complete automated knowledge-based planning pipeline. Phys Med 2020; 72:73-79. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2020.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
18
|
Knowledge‐based automated planning with three‐dimensional generative adversarial networks. Med Phys 2019; 47:297-306. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
|
19
|
Kroshko A, Morin O, Archambault L. Stochastic frontier analysis as knowledge-based model to improve sparing of organs-at-risk for VMAT-treated prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:085007. [PMID: 30818294 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab0b4d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Stochastic frontier analysis (SFA) is used as a novel knowledge-based technique in order to develop a predictive model of dosimetric features from significant geometric parameters describing a patient morphology. 406 patients treated with VMAT for prostate cancer were analyzed retrospectively. Cases were divided into three prescription-based groups. Seven geometric parameters are extracted to characterize the relationship between the organs-at-risk (bladder and rectum) with the planning volume (PTV). In total, 37 dosimetric parameters are tested for these two OARs. SFA allows the determination of the minimum achievable dose to the OAR based on the geometric parameters. Stochastic frontiers are determined with a maximum likelihood estimation technique. The SFA model was tested using validation cohort (30 patients with prescribed dose between 60 and 70 Gy) where 77% (23 out of 30) of the predicted DVHs present a 5% or less dose deterioration for the bladder and rectum with the planned DVH. SFA can be used in EBRT planning as a predictive model based on anatomical features of previously treated plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelika Kroshko
- Département de Radio-Oncologie et Centre de Recherche sur le Cancer de l'université Laval, Pavillon l'Hôtel-Dieu de Québec, Québec, Québec, G1R 2J6, Canada. Département de Physique, de Génie Physique et d'Optique, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, G1K 7P4, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Crowson MG, Ranisau J, Eskander A, Babier A, Xu B, Kahmke RR, Chen JM, Chan TCY. A contemporary review of machine learning in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Laryngoscope 2019; 130:45-51. [PMID: 30706465 DOI: 10.1002/lary.27850] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2018] [Accepted: 01/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
One of the key challenges with big data is leveraging the complex network of information to yield useful clinical insights. The confluence of massive amounts of health data and a desire to make inferences and insights on these data has produced a substantial amount of interest in machine-learning analytic methods. There has been a drastic increase in the otolaryngology literature volume describing novel applications of machine learning within the past 5 years. In this timely contemporary review, we provide an overview of popular machine-learning techniques, and review recent machine-learning applications in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery including neurotology, head and neck oncology, laryngology, and rhinology. Investigators have realized significant success in validated models with model sensitivities and specificities approaching 100%. Challenges remain in the implementation of machine-learning algorithms. This may be in part the unfamiliarity of these techniques to clinician leaders on the front lines of patient care. Spreading awareness and confidence in machine learning will follow with further validation and proof-of-value analyses that demonstrate model performance superiority over established methods. We are poised to see a greater influx of machine-learning applications to clinical problems in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery, and it is prudent for providers to understand the potential benefits and limitations of these technologies. Laryngoscope, 130:45-51, 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Crowson
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jonathan Ranisau
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antoine Eskander
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Aaron Babier
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bin Xu
- Department of Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Russel R Kahmke
- Division of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Joseph M Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Timothy C Y Chan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kearney V, Chan JW, Valdes G, Solberg TD, Yom SS. The application of artificial intelligence in the IMRT planning process for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol 2018; 87:111-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.10.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Revised: 10/18/2018] [Accepted: 10/20/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
22
|
Goli A, Boutilier JJ, Craig T, Sharpe MB, Chan TCY. A small number of objective function weight vectors is sufficient for automated treatment planning in prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:195004. [PMID: 29998853 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad2f0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Current practice for treatment planning optimization can be both inefficient and time consuming. In this paper, we propose an automated planning methodology that aims to combine both explorative and prescriptive approaches for improving the efficiency and the quality of the treatment planning process. Given a treatment plan, our explorative approach explores trade-offs between different objectives and finds an acceptable region for objective function weights via inverse optimization. Intuitively, the shape and size of these regions describe how 'sensitive' a patient is to perturbations in objective function weights. We then develop an integer programming-based prescriptive approach that exploits the information encoded by these regions to find a set of five representative objective function weight vectors such that for each patient there exists at least one representative weight vector that can produce a high quality treatment plan. Using 315 patients from Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, we show that the produced treatment plans are comparable and, for [Formula: see text] of cases, improve upon the inversely optimized plans that are generated from the historical clinical treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Goli
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Toronto, 5 King's College Road, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 3G8, Canada. The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, 5807 S Woodlawn Ave, Chicago, IL 60637, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Cevik M, Shirvani Ghomi P, Aleman D, Lee Y, Berdyshev A, Nordstrom H, Riad S, Sahgal A, Ruschin M. Modeling and comparison of alternative approaches for sector duration optimization in a dedicated radiosurgery system. Phys Med Biol 2018; 63:155009. [PMID: 29972141 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aad105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an effective technique to treat brain metastasis for which several inverse planning methods may be appropriate. We compare three different optimization models for segment duration optimization in SRS using Leksell Gamma Knife® IconTM (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden). We investigate (1) a linear programming approach, (2) a piecewise quadratic penalty approach, and (3) an unconstrained convex moment-based penalty approach. We examine the performances of these approaches using anonymized data from 14 previously treated cases. In addition, we investigate the important modeling question of selecting weights for the objective functions where we use a simulated annealing algorithm to determine these weights for each model. The inverse plans obtained via optimization models are compared against each other and against the clinical plans. The three inverse planning models can all yield optimal treatment plans in a reasonable amount of time and the treatment plans obtained by these models meet or exceed clinical guidelines while displaying high conformity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Cevik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Babier A, Boutilier JJ, McNiven AL, Chan TC. Knowledge‐based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer. Med Phys 2018; 45:2875-2883. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.12930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2017] [Revised: 03/12/2018] [Accepted: 04/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Babier
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto 5 King's College Road Toronto M5S 3G8 ONCanada
| | - Justin J. Boutilier
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto 5 King's College Road Toronto M5S 3G8 ONCanada
| | - Andrea L. McNiven
- Radiation Medicine Program UHN Princess Margaret Cancer Centre 610 University of Avenue Toronto M5T 2M9 ONCanada
- Department of Radiation Oncology University of Toronto 148 ‐ 150 College Street Toronto M5S 3S2 ONCanada
| | - Timothy C.Y. Chan
- Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Toronto 5 King's College Road Toronto M5S 3G8 ONCanada
- Techna Institute for the Advancement of Technology for Health 124 ‐ 100 College Street Toronto M5G 1L5 ONCanada
| |
Collapse
|