1
|
Lebbink F, Stocchiero S, Fossati P, Engwall E, Georg D, Stock M, Knäusl B. Parameter based 4D dose calculations for proton therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 27:100473. [PMID: 37520640 PMCID: PMC10374597 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100473] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Retrospective log file-based analysis provides the actual dose delivered based on the patient's breathing and the daily beam-delivery dynamics. To predict the motion sensitivity of the treatment plan on a patient-specific basis before treatment start a prospective tool is required. Such a parameter-based tool has been investigated with the aim to be used in clinical routine. Materials and Methods 4D dose calculations (4DDC) were performed for seven cancer patients with small breathing motion treated with scanned pulsed proton beams. Validation of the parameter-based 4DDC (p-4DDC) method was performed with an anthropomorphic phantom and patient data employing measurements and a log file-based 4DDC tool. The dose volume histogram parameters (Dx%) were investigated for the target and the organs at risk, compared to static and the file-based approach. Results The difference between the measured and the p-4DDC dose was within the deviation of the measurements. The maximum deviation was 0.4Gy. For the planning target volume D98% varied up to 15% compared to the static scenario, while the results from the log file and p-4DDC agreed within 2%. For the liver patients, D33%liver deviated up to 35% compared to static and 10% comparing the two 4DDC tools, while for the pancreas patients the D1%stomach varied up to 45% and 11%, respectively. Conclusion The results showed that p-4DDC could be used prospectively. The next step will be the clinical implementation of the p-4DDC tool, which can support a decision to either adapt the treatment plan or apply motion mitigation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franciska Lebbink
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Silvia Stocchiero
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | | | - Dietmar Georg
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Barbara Knäusl
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Radiation Oncology, Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Knäusl B, Lebbink F, Fossati P, Engwall E, Georg D, Stock M. Patient Breathing Motion and Delivery Specifics Influencing the Robustness of a Proton Pancreas Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092550. [PMID: 37174016 PMCID: PMC10177445 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Motion compensation strategies in particle therapy depend on the anatomy, motion amplitude and underlying beam delivery technology. This retrospective study on pancreas patients with small moving tumours analysed existing treatment concepts and serves as a basis for future treatment strategies for patients with larger motion amplitudes as well as the transition towards carbon ion treatments. The dose distributions of 17 hypofractionated proton treatment plans were analysed using 4D dose tracking (4DDT). The recalculation of clinical treatment plans employing robust optimisation for mitigating different organ fillings was performed on phased-based 4D computed tomography (4DCT) data considering the accelerator (pulsed scanned pencil beams delivered by a synchrotron) and the breathing-time structure. The analysis confirmed the robustness of the included treatment plans concerning the interplay of beam and organ motion. The median deterioration of D50% (ΔD50%) for the clinical target volume (CTV) and the planning target volume (PTV) was below 2%, while the only outlier was observed for ΔD98% with -35.1%. The average gamma pass rate over all treatment plans (2%/ 2 mm) was 88.8% ± 8.3, while treatment plans for motion amplitudes larger than 1 mm performed worse. For organs at risk (OARs), the median ΔD2% was below 3%, but for single patients, essential changes, e.g., up to 160% for the stomach were observed. The hypofractionated proton treatment for pancreas patients based on robust treatment plan optimisation and 2 to 4 horizontal and vertical beams showed to be robust against intra-fractional movements up to 3.7 mm. It could be demonstrated that the patient's orientation did not influence the motion sensitivity. The identified outliers showed the need for continuous 4DDT calculations in clinical practice to identify patient cases with more significant deviations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Knäusl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Franciska Lebbink
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | - Piero Fossati
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| | | | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Markus Stock
- MedAustron Ion Therapy Centre, Medical Physics, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
- Division Medical Physics, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, 2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhang Y, Trnkova P, Toshito T, Heijmen B, Richter C, Aznar M, Albertini F, Bolsi A, Daartz J, Bertholet J, Knopf A. A survey of practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2023; 26:100439. [PMID: 37124167 PMCID: PMC10133874 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Organ motion compromises accurate particle therapy delivery. This study reports on the practice patterns for real-time intrafractional motion-management in particle therapy to evaluate current clinical practice and wishes and barriers to implementation. Materials and methods An institutional questionnaire was distributed to particle therapy centres worldwide (7/2020-6/2021) asking which type(s) of real-time respiratory motion management (RRMM) methods were used, for which treatment sites, and what were the wishes and barriers to implementation. This was followed by a three-round DELPHI consensus analysis (10/2022) to define recommendations on required actions and future vision. With 70 responses from 17 countries, response rate was 100% for Europe (23/23 centres), 96% for Japan (22/23) and 53% for USA (20/38). Results Of the 68 clinically operational centres, 85% used RRMM, with 41% using both rescanning and active methods. Sixty-four percent used active-RRMM for at least one treatment site, mostly with gating guided by an external marker. Forty-eight percent of active-RRMM users wished to expand or change their RRMM technique. The main barriers were technical limitations and limited resources. From the DELPHI analysis, optimisation of rescanning parameters, improvement of motion models, and pre-treatment 4D evaluation were unanimously considered clinically important future focus. 4D dose calculation was identified as the top requirement for future commercial treatment planning software. Conclusion A majority of particle therapy centres have implemented RRMM. Still, further development and clinical integration were desired by most centres. Joint industry, clinical and research efforts are needed to translate innovation into efficient workflows for broad-scale implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Petra Trnkova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Toshiyuki Toshito
- Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Ben Heijmen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Center (Erasmus MC), Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian Richter
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Marianne Aznar
- Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alexandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Juliane Daartz
- F. Burr Proton Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Jenny Bertholet
- Division of Medical Radiation Physics and Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antje Knopf
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
- Institute for Medical Engineering and Medical Informatics, School of Life Science FHNW, Muttenz, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schneider S, Stefanowicz S, Jentsch C, Lohaus F, Thiele J, Haak D, Valentini C, Platzek I, G. C. Troost E, Hoffmann AL. Reduction of intrafraction pancreas motion using an abdominal corset compatible with proton therapy and MRI. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 38:111-116. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
5
|
Bäumer C, Frakulli R, Kohl J, Nagaraja S, Steinmeier T, Worawongsakul R, Timmermann B. Adaptive Proton Therapy of Pediatric Head and Neck Cases Using MRI-Based Synthetic CTs: Initial Experience of the Prospective KiAPT Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14112616. [PMID: 35681594 PMCID: PMC9179385 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14112616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Interfractional anatomical changes might affect the outcome of proton therapy (PT). We aimed to prospectively evaluate the role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) based adaptive PT for children with tumors of the head and neck and base of skull. METHODS MRI verification images were acquired at half of the treatment course. A synthetic computed tomography (CT) image was created using this MRI and a deformable image registration (DIR) to the reference MRI. The methodology was verified with in-silico phantoms and validated using a clinical case with a shrinking cystic hygroma on the basis of dosimetric quantities of contoured structures. The dose distributions on the verification X-ray CT and on the synthetic CT were compared with a gamma-index test using global 2 mm/2% criteria. RESULTS Regarding the clinical validation case, the gamma-index pass rate was 98.3%. Eleven patients were included in the clinical study. The most common diagnosis was rhabdomyosarcoma (73%). Craniofacial tumor site was predominant in 64% of patients, followed by base of skull (18%). For one individual case the synthetic CT showed an increase in the median D2 and Dmax dose on the spinal cord from 20.5 GyRBE to 24.8 GyRBE and 14.7 GyRBE to 25.1 GyRBE, respectively. Otherwise, doses received by OARs remained relatively stable. Similarly, the target volume coverage seen by D95% and V95% remained unchanged. CONCLUSIONS The method of transferring anatomical changes from MRIs to a synthetic CTs was successfully implemented and validated with simple, commonly available tools. In the frame of our early results on a small cohort, no clinical relevant deterioration for neither PTV coverage nor an increased dose burden to OARs occurred. However, the study will be continued to identify a pediatric patient cohort, which benefits from adaptive treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics, Technische Universität Dortmund, 44227 Dortmund, Germany
- Correspondence:
| | - Rezarta Frakulli
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Jessica Kohl
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Sindhu Nagaraja
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Steinmeier
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Rasin Worawongsakul
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Radiology, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Nakhon 73170, Thailand
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany; (R.F.); (J.K.); (S.N.); (T.S.); (R.W.); (B.T.)
- University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Particle Therapy, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
The dose accumulation and the impact of deformable image registration on dose reporting parameters in a moving patient undergoing proton radiotherapy. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56:248-258. [PMID: 35575586 PMCID: PMC9122289 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2022-0016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Potential changes in patient anatomy during proton radiotherapy may lead to a deviation of the delivered dose. A dose estimate can be computed through a deformable image registration (DIR) driven dose accumulation. The present study evaluates the accumulated dose uncertainties in a patient subject to an inadvertent breathing associated motion. MATERIALS AND METHODS A virtual lung tumour was inserted into a pair of single participant landmark annotated computed tomography images depicting opposite breathing phases, with the deep inspiration breath-hold the planning reference and the exhale the off-reference geometry. A novel Monte Carlo N-Particle, Version 6 (MCNP6) dose engine was developed, validated and used in treatment plan optimization. Three DIR methods were compared and used to transfer the exhale simulated dose to the reference geometry. Dose conformity and homogeneity measures from International Committee on Radioactivity Units and Measurements (ICRU) reports 78 and 83 were evaluated on simulated dose distributions registered with different DIR algorithms. RESULTS The MCNP6 dose engine handled patient-like geometries in reasonable dose calculation times. All registration methods were able to align image associated landmarks to distances, comparable to voxel sizes. A moderate deterioration of ICRU measures was encountered in comparing doses in on and off-reference anatomy. There were statistically significant DIR driven differences in ICRU measures, particularly a 10% difference in the relative D98% for planning tumour volume and in the 3 mm/3% gamma passing rate. CONCLUSIONS T he dose accumulation over two anatomies resulted in a DIR driven uncertainty, important in reporting the associated ICRU measures for quality assurance.
Collapse
|
7
|
Li H, Dong L, Bert C, Chang J, Flampouri S, Jee KW, Lin L, Moyers M, Mori S, Rottmann J, Tryggestad E, Vedam S. Report of AAPM Task Group 290: Respiratory motion management for particle therapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:e50-e81. [PMID: 35066871 PMCID: PMC9306777 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Revised: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Dose uncertainty induced by respiratory motion remains a major concern for treating thoracic and abdominal lesions using particle beams. This Task Group report reviews the impact of tumor motion and dosimetric considerations in particle radiotherapy, current motion‐management techniques, and limitations for different particle‐beam delivery modes (i.e., passive scattering, uniform scanning, and pencil‐beam scanning). Furthermore, the report provides guidance and risk analysis for quality assurance of the motion‐management procedures to ensure consistency and accuracy, and discusses future development and emerging motion‐management strategies. This report supplements previously published AAPM report TG76, and considers aspects of motion management that are crucial to the accurate and safe delivery of particle‐beam therapy. To that end, this report produces general recommendations for commissioning and facility‐specific dosimetric characterization, motion assessment, treatment planning, active and passive motion‐management techniques, image guidance and related decision‐making, monitoring throughout therapy, and recommendations for vendors. Key among these recommendations are that: (1) facilities should perform thorough planning studies (using retrospective data) and develop standard operating procedures that address all aspects of therapy for any treatment site involving respiratory motion; (2) a risk‐based methodology should be adopted for quality management and ongoing process improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Christoph Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Joe Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kyung-Wook Jee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Liyong Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Michael Moyers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Shinichiro Mori
- Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan
| | - Joerg Rottmann
- Center for Proton Therapy, Proton Therapy Singapore, Proton Therapy Pte Ltd, Singapore
| | - Erik Tryggestad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Sastry Vedam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland, Baltimore, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Chen Y, Gong G, Wang Y, Liu C, Su Y, Wang L, Yang B, Yin Y. Comparative Evaluation of 4-Dimensional Computed Tomography and 4-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Delineate the Target of Primary Liver Cancer. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2021; 20:15330338211045499. [PMID: 34617855 PMCID: PMC8504652 DOI: 10.1177/15330338211045499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the feasibility of 4-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) in establishing the target of primary liver cancer in comparison with 4-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT). Methods and Materials: A total of 23 patients with primary liver cancer who received radiotherapy were selected, and 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulations were conducted to obtain 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI simulation images. The 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI data were sorted into 10 and 8 respiratory phase bins, respectively. The liver and gross tumor volumes (GTVs) were delineated in all images using programmed clinical workflows under tumor delineation guidelines. The internal organs at risk volumes (IRVs) and internal target volumes (ITVs) were the unions of all the phase livers and GTVs, respectively. Then, the artifacts, liver volume, GTV, and motion range in 4DCT and T2w-4DMRI were compared. Results: The mean GTV volume based on 4DMRI was 136.42 ± 231.27 cm3, which was 25.04 cm3 (15.5%) less than that of 4DCT (161.46 ± 280.29 cm3). The average volume of ITV determined by 4DMRI was 166.12 ± 270.43 cm3, which was 22.44 cm3 (11.9%) less than that determined by 4DCT (188.56 ± 307.57 cm3). Liver volume and IRV in 4DMRI increased by 4.0% and 6.6%, respectively, compared with 4DCT. The difference in tumor motion by T2w-4DMRI based on the centroid was greater than that of 4DCT in the L/R, A/P, and S/I directions, and the average displacement differences were 2.6, 2.8, and 6.9 mm, respectively. The severe artifacts in 4DCT were 47.8% (11/23) greater than in 4DMRI 17.4% (4/23). Conclusions: Compared with 4DCT, T2-weighted and navigator-triggered 4DMRI produces fewer artifacts and larger motion differences in hepatic intrafraction tumors, which is a feasible technique for primary liver cancer treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yukai Chen
- East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Guanzhong Gong
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yinxing Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Chenlu Liu
- School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of South China, Hengyang, China
| | - Ya Su
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Lizhen Wang
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| | - Bo Yang
- East China University of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Yong Yin
- Shandong Cancer Hospital and Institute, Shandong First Medical University and Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Jinan, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bouchart C, Navez J, Closset J, Hendlisz A, Van Gestel D, Moretti L, Van Laethem JL. Novel strategies using modern radiotherapy to improve pancreatic cancer outcomes: toward a new standard? Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920936093. [PMID: 32684987 PMCID: PMC7343368 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920936093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) remains one of the most aggressive solid tumours with an estimated 5-year overall survival rate of 7% for all stages combined. In this highly resistant disease that is located in the vicinity of many radiosensitive organs, the role of radiotherapy (RT) and indications for its use in this setting have been debated for a long time and are still under investigation. Although a survival benefit has yet to be clearly demonstrated for RT, it is the only technique, other than surgery, that has been demonstrated to lead to local control improvement. The adjuvant approach is now strongly challenged by neoadjuvant treatments that could spare patients with rapidly progressive systemic disease from unnecessary surgery and may increase free margin (R0) resection rates for those eligible for surgery. Recently developed dose-escalated RT treatments, designed either to maintain full-dose chemotherapy or to deliver a high biologically effective dose, particularly to areas of contact between the tumour and blood vessels, such as hypofractionated ablative RT (HFA-RT) or stereotactic body RT (SBRT), are progressively changing the treatment landscape. These modern strategies are currently being tested in prospective clinical trials with encouraging preliminary results, paving the way for more effective treatment combinations using novel targeted therapies. This review summarizes the current literature regarding the use of RT for the treatment of primary PDAC, describes the limitations of conventional RT, and discusses the emerging role of dose-escalated RT and heavy-particle RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christelle Bouchart
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Boulevard de Waterloo, 121, Brussels, 1000, Belgium
| | - Julie Navez
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean Closset
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Dirk Van Gestel
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luigi Moretti
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Luc Van Laethem
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Digestive Oncology, Erasme University Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hoffmann A, Oborn B, Moteabbed M, Yan S, Bortfeld T, Knopf A, Fuchs H, Georg D, Seco J, Spadea MF, Jäkel O, Kurz C, Parodi K. MR-guided proton therapy: a review and a preview. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:129. [PMID: 32471500 PMCID: PMC7260752 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01571-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The targeting accuracy of proton therapy (PT) for moving soft-tissue tumours is expected to greatly improve by real-time magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. The integration of MRI and PT at the treatment isocenter would offer the opportunity of combining the unparalleled soft-tissue contrast and real-time imaging capabilities of MRI with the most conformal dose distribution and best dose steering capability provided by modern PT. However, hybrid systems for MR-integrated PT (MRiPT) have not been realized so far due to a number of hitherto open technological challenges. In recent years, various research groups have started addressing these challenges and exploring the technical feasibility and clinical potential of MRiPT. The aim of this contribution is to review the different aspects of MRiPT, to report on the status quo and to identify important future research topics. Methods Four aspects currently under study and their future directions are discussed: modelling and experimental investigations of electromagnetic interactions between the MRI and PT systems, integration of MRiPT workflows in clinical facilities, proton dose calculation algorithms in magnetic fields, and MRI-only based proton treatment planning approaches. Conclusions Although MRiPT is still in its infancy, significant progress on all four aspects has been made, showing promising results that justify further efforts for research and development to be undertaken. First non-clinical research solutions have recently been realized and are being thoroughly characterized. The prospect that first prototype MRiPT systems for clinical use will likely exist within the next 5 to 10 years seems realistic, but requires significant work to be performed by collaborative efforts of research groups and industrial partners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aswin Hoffmann
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bradley Oborn
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia.,Illawarra Cancer Care Centre, Wollongong Hospital, Wollongong, Australia
| | - Maryam Moteabbed
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Susu Yan
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Division of Radiation Biophysics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Antje Knopf
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Herman Fuchs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH, Vienna, Austria.,Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dietmar Georg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna/AKH, Vienna, Austria.,Christian Doppler Laboratory for Medical Radiation Research for Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joao Seco
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Maria Francesca Spadea
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum DKFZ and Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center at the University Medical Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christopher Kurz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Garching, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Volz L, Kelleter L, Brons S, Burigo L, Graeff C, Niebuhr NI, Radogna R, Scheloske S, Schömers C, Jolly S, Seco J. Experimental exploration of a mixed helium/carbon beam for online treatment monitoring in carbon ion beam therapy. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 65:055002. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab6e52] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
12
|
Li G, Liu Y, Nie X. Respiratory-Correlated (RC) vs. Time-Resolved (TR) Four-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (4DMRI) for Radiotherapy of Thoracic and Abdominal Cancer. Front Oncol 2019; 9:1024. [PMID: 31681573 PMCID: PMC6798178 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2019.01024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2019] [Accepted: 09/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent technological and clinical advancements of both respiratory-correlated (RC) and time-resolved (TR) four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) techniques are reviewed in light of tumor/organ motion simulation, monitoring, and assessment in radiotherapy. For radiotherapy of thoracic and abdominal cancer, respiratory-induced tumor motion, and motion variation due to breathing irregularities are the major uncertainties in treatment. RC-4DMRI is developed to assess tumor motion for treatment planning, whereas TR-4DMRI is developed to assess both motion and motion variation for treatment planning, delivery and assessment. RC-4DMRI is reconstructed to provide one-breathing-cycle motion, similar to 4D computed tomography (4DCT), the current clinical standard, but with higher soft-tissue contrast, no ionizing radiation, and less binning artifacts due to the use of an internal respiratory surrogate. Recent studies have shown that its spatial resolution has reached or exceeded that of 4DCT and scanning time becomes clinically acceptable. TR-4DMRI is recently developed with an adequate spatiotemporal resolution to assess tumor motion and motion variations for treatment simulation, delivery and assessment. The super-resolution approach is most promising since it can image any organ/body motion, whereas RC-4D MRI are limited to resolve only respiration-induced motion and some TR-4DMRI approaches may more or less depend on RC-4DMRI. TR-4DMRI provides multi-breath motion data that are useful not only in MR-guided radiotherapy but also for building a patient-specific motion model to guide radiotherapy treatment using an non-MR-equipped linear accelerator. Based on 4DMRI motion data, motion-corrected dynamic contrast imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging have also been reported, aiming to facilitate tumor delineation for more accurate radiotherapy targeting. Both RC- and TR-4DMRI have been evaluated for potential clinical applications, such as delineation of tumor volumes, where sufficiently high spatial resolution and large field-of-view are required. The 4DMRI techniques are promising to play a role in motion assessment in radiotherapy treatment planning, delivery, assessment, and adaptation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guang Li
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Dolde K, Schneider S, Stefanowicz S, Alimusaj M, Flügel B, Saito N, Troost EGC, Pfaffenberger A, Hoffmann AL. Comparison of pancreatic respiratory motion management with three abdominal corsets for particle radiation therapy: Case study. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2019; 20:111-119. [PMID: 31120639 PMCID: PMC6560237 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.12613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Abdominal organ motion seriously compromises the targeting accuracy for particle therapy in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma. This study compares three different abdominal corsets regarding their ability to reduce pancreatic motion and their potential usability in particle therapy. Materials and methods A patient‐individualized polyurethane (PU), a semi‐individualized polyethylene (PE), and a patient‐individualized three‐dimensional‐scan based polyethylene (3D‐PE) corset were manufactured for one healthy volunteer. Time‐resolved volumetric four‐dimensional‐magnetic resonance imaging (4D‐MRI) and single‐slice two‐dimensional (2D) cine‐MRI scans were acquired on two consecutive days to compare free‐breathing motion patterns with and without corsets. The corset material properties, such as thickness variance, material homogeneity in Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography (CT) scans, and manufacturing features were compared. The water equivalent ratio (WER) of corset material samples was measured using a multi‐layer ionization chamber for proton energies of 150 and 200 MeV. Results All corsets reduced the pancreatic motion on average by 9.6 mm in inferior–superior and by 3.2 mm in anterior‐posterior direction. With corset, the breathing frequency was approximately doubled and the day‐to‐day motion variations were reduced. The WER measurements showed an average value of 0.993 and 0.956 for the PE and 3DPE corset, respectively, and of 0.298 for the PU corset. The PE and 3DPE corsets showed a constant thickness of 2.8 ± 0.2 and 3.8 ± 0.2 mm, respectively and a homogeneous material composition with a standard deviation (SD) of 31 and 32 HU, respectively. The PU corset showed a variable thickness of 4.2 − 25.6 mm and a heterogeneous structure with air inclusions with an SD of 113 HU. Conclusion Abdominal corsets may be effective devices to reduce pancreatic motion. For particle therapy, PE‐based corsets are preferred over PU‐based corset due to their material homogeneity and constant thickness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Dolde
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sergej Schneider
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sarah Stefanowicz
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Merkur Alimusaj
- Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beate Flügel
- Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nami Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, and Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden Germany
| | - Asja Pfaffenberger
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Aswin L Hoffmann
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dolde K, Naumann P, Dávid C, Kachelriess M, Lomax AJ, Weber DC, Saito N, Burigo LN, Pfaffenberger A, Zhang Y. Comparing the effectiveness and efficiency of various gating approaches for PBS proton therapy of pancreatic cancer using 4D-MRI datasets. Phys Med Biol 2019; 64:085011. [PMID: 30893660 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab1175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Abdominal organ motion may lead to considerable uncertainties in pencil-beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy of pancreatic cancer. Beam gating, where irradiation only occurs in certain breathing phases in which the gating conditions are fulfilled, may be an option to reduce the interplay effect between tumor motion and the scanning beam. This study aims to, first, determine suitable gating windows with respect to effectiveness (low interplay effect) and efficiency (high duty cycles). Second, it investigates whether beam gating allows for a better mitigation of the interplay effect along the treatment course than free-breathing irradiations. Based on synthetic 4D-CTs, generated by warping 3D-CTs with vector fields extracted from time-resolved magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) for 8 pancreatic cancer patients, 4D dose calculations (4DDC) were performed to analyze the duty cycle and homogeneity index HI = d5/d95 for four different gating scenarios. These were based on either fixed threshold values of CTV (clinical target volume) mean or maximum motion amplitudes (5 mm), relative CTV motion amplitudes (30%) or CTV overlap criteria (95%), respectively. 4DDC for 28-fractions treatment courses were performed with fixed and variable initial breathing phases to investigate the fractionation-induced mitigation of the interplay effect. Gating criteria, based on patient-specific relative 30% CTV motion amplitudes, showed the significantly best HI values with sufficient duty cycles, in contrast to inferior results by either fixed gating thresholds or overlap criteria. For gated treatments with 28 fractions, less fractionation-induced mitigation of the interplay effect was observed for gating criteria with gating windows ⩾30%, compared to free-breathing treatments. The gating effectiveness for multiple fractions was improved by allowing a variable initial breathing phase. Gating with relative amplitude thresholds are effective for proton therapy of pancreatic cancer. By combining beam gating with variable initial breathing phases, a pronounced mitigation of the interplay effect by fractionation can be achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Dolde
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany. Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Dolde K, Zhang Y, Chaudhri N, Dávid C, Kachelrieß M, Lomax AJ, Naumann P, Saito N, Weber DC, Pfaffenberger A. 4DMRI-based investigation on the interplay effect for pencil beam scanning proton therapy of pancreatic cancer patients. Radiat Oncol 2019; 14:30. [PMID: 30732657 PMCID: PMC6367829 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-019-1231-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 01/24/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Time-resolved volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (4DMRI) offers the potential to analyze 3D motion with high soft-tissue contrast without additional imaging dose. We use 4DMRI to investigate the interplay effect for pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy of pancreatic cancer and to quantify the dependency of residual interplay effects on the number of treatment fractions. METHODS Based on repeated 4DMRI datasets for nine pancreatic cancer patients, synthetic 4DCTs were generated by warping static 3DCTs with 4DMRI deformation vector fields. 4D dose calculations for scanned proton therapy were performed to quantify the interplay effect by CTV coverage (v95) and dose homogeneity (d5/d95) for incrementally up to 28 fractions. The interplay effect was further correlated to CTV motion characteristics. For quality assurance, volume and mass conservation were evaluated by Jacobian determinants and volume-density comparisons. RESULTS For the underlying patient cohort with CTV motion amplitudes < 15 mm, we observed significant correlations between CTV motion amplitudes and both the length of breathing cycles and the interplay effect. For individual fractions, tumor underdosage down to v95 = 70% was observed with pronounced dose heterogeneity (d5/d95 = 1.3). For full × 28 fractionated treatments, we observed a mitigation of the interplay effect with increasing fraction numbers. On average, after seven fractions, a CTV coverage with 95-107% of the prescribed dose was reached with sufficient dose homogeneity. For organs at risk, no significant differences were found between the static and accumulated dose plans for 28 fractions. CONCLUSION Intrafractional organ motion exhibits a large interplay effect for PBS proton therapy of pancreatic cancer. The interplay effect correlates with CTV motion, but can be mitigated efficiently by fractionation, mainly due to different breathing starting phases in fractionated treatments. For hypofractionated treatments, a further restriction of motion may be required. Repeated 4DMRI measurements are a viable tool for pre- and post-treatment evaluations of the interplay effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Dolde
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ye Zhang
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Naved Chaudhri
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christian Dávid
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marc Kachelrieß
- X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Antony John Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
- Department of Physics, ETH Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Naumann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nami Saito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Damien Charles Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), 5232 Villigen-PSI, Switzerland
| | - Asja Pfaffenberger
- Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiooncology (HIRO), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dolde K, Dávid C, Echner G, Floca R, Hentschke C, Maier F, Niebuhr N, Ohmstedt K, Saito N, Alimusaj M, Fluegel B, Naumann P, Dreher C, Freitag M, Pfaffenberger A. 4DMRI-based analysis of inter— and intrafractional pancreas motion and deformation with different immobilization devices. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2019. [DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/aaf9ae] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
17
|
Stefanowicz S, Stützer K, Zschaeck S, Jakobi A, Troost EGC. Comparison of different treatment planning approaches for intensity-modulated proton therapy with simultaneous integrated boost for pancreatic cancer. Radiat Oncol 2018; 13:228. [PMID: 30466468 PMCID: PMC6249773 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-018-1165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Neoadjuvant radio(chemo)therapy of non-metastasized, borderline resectable or unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer is complex and prone to cause side-effects, e.g., in gastrointestinal organs. Intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) enables a high conformity to the targets while simultaneously sparing the normal tissue such that dose-escalation strategies come within reach. In this in silico feasibility study, we compared four IMPT planning strategies including robust multi-field optimization (rMFO) and a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) for dose-escalation in pancreatic cancer patients. METHODS For six pancreatic cancer patients referred for adjuvant or primary radiochemotherapy, four rMFO-IMPT-SIB treatment plans each, consisting of two or three (non-)coplanar beam arrangements, were optimized. Dose values for both targets, i.e., the elective clinical target volume [CTV, prescribed dose Dpres = 51Gy(RBE)] and the boost target [Dpres = 66Gy(RBE)], for the organs at risk as well as target conformity and homogeneity indexes, derived from the dose volume histograms, were statistically compared. RESULTS All treatment plans of each strategy fulfilled the prescribed doses to the targets (Dpres(GTV,CTV) = 100%, D95%,(GTV,CTV) ≥ 95%, D2%,(GTV,CTV) ≤ 107%). No significant differences for the conformity index were found (p > 0.05), however, treatment plans with a three non-coplanar beam strategy were most homogenous to both targets (p < 0.045). The median value of all dosimetric results of the large and small bowel as well as for the liver and the spinal cord met the dose constraints with all beam arrangements. Irrespective of the planning strategies, the dose constraint for the duodenum and stomach were not met. Using the three-beam arrangements, the dose to the left kidney could be significant decreased when compared to a two-beam strategy (p < 0.045). CONCLUSION Based on our findings we recommend a three-beam configuration with at least one non-coplanar beam for dose-escalated SIB with rMFO-IMPT in advanced pancreatic cancer patients achieving a homogeneous dose distribution in the target while simultaneously minimizing the dose to the organs at risk. Further treatment planning studies on aspects of breathing and organ motion need to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stefanowicz
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristin Stützer
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Jakobi
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. .,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany. .,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|