1
|
Yang J, Liu X, Zhang H, Dai Z, He P, Ma Y, Shen G, Chen W, Li Q. Nanodosimetric quantity-weighted dose optimization for carbon-ion treatment planning. Phys Eng Sci Med 2024; 47:703-715. [PMID: 38416372 DOI: 10.1007/s13246-024-01399-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
Dose verification of treatment plans is an essential step in radiotherapy workflows. In this work, we propose a novel method of treatment planning based on nanodosimetric quantity-weighted dose (NQWD), which could realize biological representation using pure physical quantities for biological-oriented carbon ion-beam treatment plans and their direct verification. The relationship between nanodosimetric quantities and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) was studied with the linear least-squares method for carbon-ion radiation fields. Next, under the framework of the matRad treatment planning platform, NQWD was optimized using the existing RBE-weighted dose (RWD) optimization algorithm. The schemes of NQWD-based treatment planning were compared with the RWD treatment plans in term of the microdosimetric kinetic model (MKM). The results showed that the nanodosimetric quantity F3 - 10 had a good correlation with the radiobiological effect reflected by the relationship between RBE and F3 - 10. Moreover, the NQWD-based treatment plans reproduced the RWD plans generally. Therefore, F3 - 10 could be adopted as a radiation quality descriptor for carbon-ion treatment planning. The novel method proposed herein not only might be helpful for rapid physical verification of biological-oriented ion-beam treatment plans with the development of experimental nanodosimetry, but also makes the direct comparison of ion-beam treatment plans in different institutions possible. Thus, our proposed method might be potentially developed to be a new strategy for carbon-ion treatment planning and improve patient safety for carbon-ion radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingfen Yang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Xinguo Liu
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongying Dai
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Pengbo He
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanyuan Ma
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Guosheng Shen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Weiqiang Chen
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China
| | - Qiang Li
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 730000, Lanzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Heavy Ion Radiation Biology and Medicine of Chinese Academy of Science, 730000, Lanzhou, China.
- Key Laboratory of Basic Research on Heavy Ion Radiation Application in Medicine, Gansu Province, 730000, Lanzhou, China.
- University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 100049, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Faddegon B, Blakely EA, Burigo L, Censor Y, Dokic I, Kondo ND, Ortiz R, Méndez JR, Rucinski A, Schubert K, Wahl N, Schulte R. Ionization detail parameters and cluster dose: a mathematical model for selection of nanodosimetric quantities for use in treatment planning in charged particle radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/acea16. [PMID: 37489619 PMCID: PMC10565507 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acea16] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To propose a mathematical model for applying ionization detail (ID), the detailed spatial distribution of ionization along a particle track, to proton and ion beam radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP).Approach. Our model provides for selection of preferred ID parameters (Ip) for RTP, that associate closest to biological effects. Cluster dose is proposed to bridge the large gap between nanoscopicIpand macroscopic RTP. Selection ofIpis demonstrated using published cell survival measurements for protons through argon, comparing results for nineteenIp:Nk,k= 2, 3, …, 10, the number of ionizations in clusters ofkor more per particle, andFk,k= 1, 2, …, 10, the number of clusters ofkor more per particle. We then describe application of the model to ID-based RTP and propose a path to clinical translation.Main results. The preferredIpwereN4andF5for aerobic cells,N5andF7for hypoxic cells. Significant differences were found in cell survival for beams having the same LET or the preferredNk. Conversely, there was no significant difference forF5for aerobic cells andF7for hypoxic cells, regardless of ion beam atomic number or energy. Further, cells irradiated with the same cluster dose for theseIphad the same cell survival. Based on these preliminary results and other compelling results in nanodosimetry, it is reasonable to assert thatIpexist that are more closely associated with biological effects than current LET-based approaches and microdosimetric RBE-based models used in particle RTP. However, more biological variables such as cell line and cycle phase, as well as ion beam pulse structure and rate still need investigation.Significance. Our model provides a practical means to select preferredIpfrom radiobiological data, and to convertIpto the macroscopic cluster dose for particle RTP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce Faddegon
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143 United States of America
| | - Eleanor A. Blakely
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11175 Campus St, Loma Linda,CA92350, United States of America
| | - Lucas Burigo
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Yair Censor
- Department of Mathematics, University of Haifa, 199 Aba Khoushy Ave. Mount Carmel, Haifa, 3498838, Israel
| | - Ivana Dokic
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Translational Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Core-Center Heidelberg, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Molecular and Translational Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg Faculty of Medicine (MFHD) and Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute of Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Naoki Domínguez Kondo
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143 United States of America
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143 United States of America
| | - José Ramos Méndez
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143 United States of America
| | - Antoni Rucinski
- Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Radzikowskiego 152, 31-342 Kraków, Poland
| | - Keith Schubert
- Baylor University, 1311 S 5th St, Waco, TX 76706, United States of America
| | - Niklas Wahl
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Reinhard Schulte
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, 11085 Campus St, Loma Linda, CA92350, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rucinski A, Biernacka A, Schulte R. Applications of nanodosimetry in particle therapy planning and beyond. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34731854 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac35f1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
This topical review summarizes underlying concepts of nanodosimetry. It describes the development and current status of nanodosimetric detector technology. It also gives an overview of Monte Carlo track structure simulations that can provide nanodosimetric parameters for treatment planning of proton and ion therapy. Classical and modern radiobiological assays that can be used to demonstrate the relationship between the frequency and complexity of DNA lesion clusters and nanodosimetric parameters are reviewed. At the end of the review, existing approaches of treatment planning based on relative biological effectiveness (RBE) models or dose-averaged linear energy transfer are contrasted with an RBE-independent approach based on nandosimetric parameters. Beyond treatment planning, nanodosimetry is also expected to have applications and give new insights into radiation protection dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anna Biernacka
- University of Gdansk, Intercollegiate Faculty of Biotechnology of University of Gdańsk and Medical University of Gdansk, 80-307 Gdansk, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pietrzak M, Mietelska M, Bancer A, Rucinski A, Brzozowska B. Geant4-DNA modeling of nanodosimetric quantities in the Jet Counter for alpha particles. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34706345 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac33eb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this work was to validate the calculation accuracy of nanodosimetric quantities in Geant4-DNA track structure simulation code. We implemented the Jet Counter (JC) nanodosimeter geometry in the simulation platform and quantified the impact of the Geant4-DNA physics models and JC detector performance on the ionization cluster size distributions (ICSD). ICSD parameters characterize the quality of radiation field and are supposed to be correlated to the complexity of the initial DNA damage in nanoscale and eventually the response of biological systems to radiation. We compared Monte Carlo simulations of ICSD in JC geometry performed using Geant4-DNA and PTra codes with experimental data collected for alpha particles at 3.8 MeV. We investigated the impact of simulation and experimental settings, i.e., three Geant4-DNA physics models, three sizes of a nanometer sensitive volume, gas to water density scaling procedure, JC ion extraction efficiency and the presence of passive components of the detector on the ICSD and their parameters. We found that ICSD in JC geometry obtained from Geant4-DNA simulations in water correspond well to ICSD measurements in nitrogen gas for all investigated settings, while the best agreement is for Geant4-DNA physics option 4. This work also discusses the accuracy and robustness of ICSD parameters in the context of the application of track structure simulation methods for treatment planning in particle therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Monika Mietelska
- National Centre for Nuclear Research, Świerk, Poland.,Biomedical Physics Division, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | | | | | - Beata Brzozowska
- Biomedical Physics Division, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Vasi F, Schneider U. First measurements of ionization cluster-size distributions with a compact nanodosimeter. Med Phys 2021; 48:2566-2571. [PMID: 33506490 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A nanodosimeter is a type of detector which measures single ionizations in a small gaseous volume in order to obtain ionization cluster size probability distributions for characterization of radiation types. Working nanodosimeter detectors are usually bulky machines which require a lot of space. In this work, the authors present a compact ceramic nanodosimeter detector and report on first measurements of cluster size distributions of 5 MeV alpha particles. METHODS Single ionization measurements are achieved by applying a weak electric field to collect positive ions in a hole in a ceramic plate. Inside the ceramic plate, due to a strong electric field, the ions are accelerated and produce impact-ionizations. The resulting electron avalanche is detected in a read-out electrode. A Bayesian unfolding algorithm is then applied to the experimentally obtained cluster size distributions to reconstruct the true cluster size distributions. RESULTS Experimentally obtained cluster size distributions by the compact nanodosimeter detector are presented. The reconstructed cluster size distributions agreed well with Monte Carlo simulated cluster size distributions for small volumes (diameter = 2.5 nm). For larger volumes, discrepancies between the reconstructed cluster size distributions and cluster size distributions from Monte Carlo simulations were observed. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, ionization cluster size probability distributions could be obtained by a small and compact nanodosimeter detector. This signifies the achievement of a critical step toward the wide application of nanodosimetric characterization of radiation types including in clinical environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiano Vasi
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Schneider
- Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|