1
|
Validation and comparison of radiograph-based organ dose reconstruction approaches for Wilms’ tumor radiation treatment plans. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:101015. [PMID: 36060631 PMCID: PMC9429523 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
|
2
|
Gupta AC, Owens CA, Shrestha S, Lee C, Smith SA, Weathers RE, Netherton T, Balter PA, Kry SF, Followill DS, Griffin KT, Long JP, Armstrong GT, Howell RM. Body region-specific 3D age-scaling functions for scaling whole-body computed tomography anatomy for pediatric late effects studies. Biomed Phys Eng Express 2022; 8:10.1088/2057-1976/ac3f4e. [PMID: 34874300 PMCID: PMC9547666 DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac3f4e] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Purpose.Radiation epidemiology studies of childhood cancer survivors treated in the pre-computed tomography (CT) era reconstruct the patients' treatment fields on computational phantoms. For such studies, the phantoms are commonly scaled to age at the time of radiotherapy treatment because age is the generally available anthropometric parameter. Several reference size phantoms are used in such studies, but reference size phantoms are only available at discrete ages (e.g.: newborn, 1, 5, 10, 15, and Adult). When such phantoms are used for RT dose reconstructions, the nearest discrete-aged phantom is selected to represent a survivor of a specific age. In this work, we (1) conducted a feasibility study to scale reference size phantoms at discrete ages to various other ages, and (2) evaluated the dosimetric impact of using exact age-scaled phantoms as opposed to nearest age-matched phantoms at discrete ages.Methods.We have adopted the University of Florida/National Cancer Institute (UF/NCI) computational phantom library for our studies. For the feasibility study, eight male and female reference size UF/NCI phantoms (5, 10, 15, and 35 years) were downscaled to fourteen different ages which included next nearest available lower discrete ages (1, 5, 10 and 15 years) and the median ages at the time of RT for Wilms' tumor (3.9 years), craniospinal (8.0 years), and all survivors (9.1 years old) in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) expansion cohort treated with RT. The downscaling was performed using our in-house age scaling functions (ASFs). To geometrically validate the scaling, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), and Euclidean distance (ED) were calculated between the scaled and ground-truth discrete-aged phantom (unscaled UF/NCI) for whole-body, brain, heart, liver, pancreas, and kidneys. Additionally, heights of the scaled phantoms were compared with ground-truth phantoms' height, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported 50th percentile height. Scaled organ masses were compared with ground-truth organ masses. For the dosimetric assessment, one reference size phantom and seventeen body-size dependent 5-year-old phantoms (9 male and 8 female) of varying body mass indices (BMI) were downscaled to 3.9-year-old dimensions for two different radiation dose studies. For the first study, we simulated a 6 MV photon right-sided flank field RT plan on a reference size 5-year-old and 3.9-year-old (both of healthy BMI), keeping the field size the same in both cases. Percent of volume receiving dose ≥15 Gy (V15) and the mean dose were calculated for the pancreas, liver, and stomach. For the second study, the same treatment plan, but with patient anatomy-dependent field sizes, was simulated on seventeen body-size dependent 5- and 3.9-year-old phantoms with varying BMIs. V15, mean dose, and minimum dose received by 1% of the volume (D1), and by 95% of the volume (D95) were calculated for pancreas, liver, stomach, left kidney (contralateral), right kidney, right and left colons, gallbladder, thoracic vertebrae, and lumbar vertebrae. A non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test was performed to determine if the dose to organs of exact age-scaled and nearest age-matched phantoms were significantly different (p < 0.05).Results.In the feasibility study, the best DSCs were obtained for the brain (median: 0.86) and whole-body (median: 0.91) while kidneys (median: 0.58) and pancreas (median: 0.32) showed poorer agreement. In the case of MDA and ED, whole-body, brain, and kidneys showed tighter distribution and lower median values as compared to other organs. For height comparison, the overall agreement was within 2.8% (3.9 cm) and 3.0% (3.2 cm) of ground-truth UF/NCI and CDC reported 50th percentile heights, respectively. For mass comparison, the maximum percent and absolute differences between the scaled and ground-truth organ masses were within 31.3% (29.8 g) and 211.8 g (16.4%), respectively (across all ages). In the first dosimetric study, absolute difference up to 6% and 1.3 Gy was found for V15and mean dose, respectively. In the second dosimetric study, V15and mean dose were significantly different (p < 0.05) for all studied organs except the fully in-beam organs. D1and D95were not significantly different for most organs (p > 0.05).Conclusion.We have successfully evaluated our ASFs by scaling UF/NCI computational phantoms from one age to another age, which demonstrates the feasibility of scaling any CT-based anatomy. We have found that dose to organs of exact age-scaled and nearest aged-matched phantoms are significantly different (p < 0.05) which indicates that using the exact age-scaled phantoms for retrospective dosimetric studies is a better approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aashish C. Gupta
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - Constance A. Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - Suman Shrestha
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD USA
| | - Susan A. Smith
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Rita E. Weathers
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Tucker Netherton
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Peter A. Balter
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - Stephen F. Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - David S. Followill
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA
| | - Keith T. Griffin
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD USA,George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - James P. Long
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA,Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA
| | - Gregory T. Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN USA
| | - Rebecca M. Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX USA,The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, TX USA,Address for correspondence: Rebecca M. Howell, Director, Radiation Dosimetry Services, Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 8060 El Rio St., Unit 605, Houston, TX 77054,
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yeom YS, Griffin KT, Mille MM, Lee C, O’Reilly S, Dong L, Jung JW, Lee C. Fetal dose from proton pencil beam scanning craniospinal irradiation during pregnancy: a Monte Carlo study. Phys Med Biol 2022; 67:10.1088/1361-6560/ac4b38. [PMID: 35026741 PMCID: PMC9890509 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac4b38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Objective. We conducted a Monte Carlo study to comprehensively investigate the fetal dose resulting from proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) craniospinal irradiation (CSI) during pregnancy.Approach. The gestational-age dependent pregnant phantom series developed at the University of Florida (UF) were converted into DICOM-RT format (CT images and structures) and imported into a treatment planning system (TPS) (Eclipse v15.6) commissioned to a IBA PBS nozzle. A proton PBS CSI plan (prescribed dose: 36 Gy) was created on the phantoms. The TOPAS MC code was used to simulate the proton PBS CSI on the phantoms, for which MC beam properties at the nozzle exit (spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) were matched to IBA PBS nozzle beam measurement data. We calculated mean absorbed doses for 28 organs and tissues and whole body of the fetus at eight gestational ages (8, 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 38 weeks). For contextual purposes, the fetal organ/tissue doses from the treatment planning CT scan of the mother's head and torso were estimated using the National Cancer Institute dosimetry system for CT (NCICT, Version 3) considering a low-dose CT protocol (CTDIvol: 8.97 mGy).Main results. The majority of the fetal organ/tissue doses from the proton PBS CSI treatment fell within a range of 3-6 mGy. The fetal organ/tissue doses for the 38 week phantom showed the largest variation with the doses ranging from 2.9 mGy (adrenals) to 8.2 mGy (eye lenses) while the smallest variation ranging from 3.2 mGy (oesophagus) to 4.4 mGy (brain) was observed for the doses for the 20 week phantom. The fetal whole-body dose ranged from 3.7 mGy (25 weeks) to 5.8 mGy (8 weeks). Most of the fetal doses from the planning CT scan fell within a range of 7-13 mGy, approximately 2-to-9 times lower than the fetal dose equivalents of the proton PBS CSI treatment (assuming a quality factor of 7).Significance. The fetal organ/tissue doses observed in the present work will be useful for one of the first clinically informative predictions on the magnitude of fetal dose during proton PBS CSI during pregnancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Soo Yeom
- Department of Radiation Convergence Engineering, Yonsei University, Wonju, Gangwon 26493, Korea
| | - Keith T. Griffin
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Choonik Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Shannon O’Reilly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Jae Won Jung
- Department of Physics, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27858, USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheon B, Lee SH, Han MC, Min CH, Han H, Kim CH, Kim JS. Development of a novel program for conversion from tetrahedral-mesh-based phantoms to DICOM dataset for radiation treatment planning: TET2DICOM. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13448. [PMID: 34633736 PMCID: PMC8803294 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 09/22/2021] [Accepted: 09/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Tetrahedral mesh (TM)-based computational human phantoms have recently been developed for evaluation of exposure dose with the merit of precisely representing human anatomy and the changing posture freely. However, conversion of recently developed TM phantoms to the Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) file format, which can be utilized in the clinic, has not been attempted. The aim of this study was to develop a technique, called TET2DICOM, to convert the TM phantoms to DICOM datasets for accurate treatment planning. MATERIALS AND METHODS The TM phantoms were sampled in voxel form to generate the DICOM computed tomography images. The DICOM-radiotherapy structure was defined based on the contour data. To evaluate TET2DICOM, the shape distortion of the TM phantoms during the conversion process was assessed, and the converted DICOM dataset was implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS). RESULTS The volume difference between the TM phantoms and the converted DICOM dataset was evaluated as less than about 0.1% in each organ. Subsequently, the converted DICOM dataset was successfully implemented in MIM (MIM Software Inc., Cleveland, USA, version 6.5.6) and RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden, version 5.0). Additionally, the various possibilities of clinical application of the program were confirmed using a deformed TM phantom in various postures. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the TM phantom, currently the most advanced computational phantom, can be implemented in a commercial TPS and this technique can enable various TM-based applications, such as evaluation of secondary cancer risk in radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bo‐Wi Cheon
- Department of Radiation Convergence EngineeringYonsei UniversityWonjuKorea
| | - Se Hyung Lee
- Department of Nuclear EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
- Department of Radiation OncologyBundang Jesaeng General HospitalSeongnamKorea
| | - Min Cheol Han
- Department of Radiation OncologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
| | - Chul Hee Min
- Department of Radiation Convergence EngineeringYonsei UniversityWonjuKorea
| | - Haegin Han
- Department of Nuclear EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
| | - Chan Hyeong Kim
- Department of Nuclear EngineeringHanyang UniversitySeoulKorea
| | - Jin Sung Kim
- Department of Radiation OncologyYonsei University College of MedicineSeoulKorea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roy A, Sarkar R, Lee C. Extensive study of radiation dose on human body at aviation altitude through Monte Carlo simulation. LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2021; 31:1-13. [PMID: 34689941 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
The diverse near-Earth radiation environment due to cosmic rays and solar radiation has direct impact on human civilization. In the present and upcoming era of increasing air transfer, it is important to have precise idea of radiation dose effects on human body during air travel. Here, we calculate the radiation dose on the human body at the aviation altitude, also considering the shielding effect of the aircraft structure, using Monte Carlo simulation technique based on Geant4 toolkit. We consider proper 3D mathematical model of the atmosphere and geomagnetic field, updated profile of the incoming particle flux due to cosmic rays and appropriate physics processes. We use quasi-realistic computational phantoms to replicate the human body (male/female) for the effective dose calculation and develop a simplified mathematical model of the aircraft (taking Boeing 777-200LR as reference) for the shielding study. We simulate the radiation environment at the flying altitude (at 10 km and considering geomagnetic latitude in the range of 45-50°), as well as at various locations inside the fuselage of the aircraft. Then, we calculate the dose rates in the different organs for both male and female phantoms, based on latest recommendations of International Commission on Radio logical Protection. This calculation shows that the sex-averaged effective dose rate in human phantom is 5.46 μSv/h, whereas, if we calculate weighted sum of equivalent dose contributions separately in female and male body: total weighted sum of equivalent dose rate received by the female phantom is 5.72 μSv/h and that by the male phantom is 5.20 μSv/h. From the simulation, we also calculate the numerous cosmogenic radionuclides produced inside the phantoms through activation or spallation processes which may induce long-term biological effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhijit Roy
- Indian Centre for Space Physics, 43 Chalantika, Garia Station Rd., Kolkata 700084, W.B., India.
| | - Ritabrata Sarkar
- Indian Centre for Space Physics, 43 Chalantika, Garia Station Rd., Kolkata 700084, W.B., India.
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20852, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hauri P, Radonic S, Vasi F, Ernst M, Sumila M, Mille MM, Lee C, Hartmann M, Schneider U. Development of whole-body representation and dose calculation in a commercial treatment planning system. Z Med Phys 2021; 32:159-172. [PMID: 34301443 PMCID: PMC9948842 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Revised: 05/03/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
For the epidemiological evaluation of long-term side effects of radiotherapy patients, it is important to know the doses to organs and tissues everywhere in the patient. Computed tomography (CT) images of the patients which contain the anatomical information are sometimes available for each treated patient. However, the available CT scans usually cover only the treated volume of the patient including the target and surrounding anatomy. To overcome this limitation, in this work we describe the development of a software tool using the Varian Eclipse Scripting API for extending a partial-body CT to a whole-body representation in the treatment planning system for dose calculation. The whole-body representation is created by fusing the partial-body CT with a similarly sized whole-body computational phantom selected from a library containing 64 phantoms of different heights, weights, and genders. The out-of-field dose is calculated with analytical models from the literature and merged with the treatment planning system-calculated dose. To test the method, the out-of-field dose distributions on the computational phantoms were compared to dose calculations on whole-body patient CTs. The mean doses, D2% and D98% were compared in 26 organs and tissues for 14 different treatment plans in 5 patients using 3D-CRT, IMRT, VMAT, coplanar and non-coplanar techniques. From these comparisons we found that mean relative differences between organ doses ranged from -10% and +20% with standard deviations of up to 40%. The developed method will help epidemiologists and researchers estimate organ doses outside the treated volume when only limited treatment planning CT information is available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Hauri
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Radonic
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland,Corresponding author: Stephan Radonic, Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fabiano Vasi
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Marina Ernst
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marcin Sumila
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Matthew M. Mille
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, USA
| | - Matthias Hartmann
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Uwe Schneider
- Department of Physics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland,Radiotherapy Hirslanden, Hirslanden Medical Center, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shrestha S, Gupta AC, Bates JE, Lee C, Owens CA, Hoppe BS, Constine LS, Smith SA, Qiao Y, Weathers RE, Yasui Y, Court LE, Paulino AC, Pinnix CC, Kry SF, Followill DS, Armstrong GT, Howell RM. Development and validation of an age-scalable cardiac model with substructures for dosimetry in late-effects studies of childhood cancer survivors. Radiother Oncol 2020; 153:163-171. [PMID: 33075392 PMCID: PMC8132170 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Revised: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation therapy is a risk factor for late cardiac disease in childhood cancer survivors. Several pediatric cohort studies have established whole heart dose and dose-volume response models. Emerging data suggest that dose to cardiac substructures may be more predictive than whole heart metrics. In order to develop substructure dose-response models, the heart model previously used for pediatric cohort dosimetry needed enhancement and substructure delineation. METHODS To enhance our heart model, we combined the age-scalable capability of our computational phantom with the anatomically-delineated (with substructures) heart models from an international humanoid phantom series. We examined cardiac volume similarity/overlap between registered age-scaled phantoms (1, 5, 10, and 15 years) with the enhanced heart model and the reference phantoms of the same age; dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and overlap coefficient (OC) were calculated for each matched pair. To assess the accuracy of our enhanced heart model, we compared doses from computed tomography-based planning (ground truth) with reconstructed heart doses. We also compared doses calculated with the prior and enhanced heart models for a cohort of nearly 5000 childhood cancer survivors. RESULTS We developed a realistic cardiac model with 14-substructures, scalable across a broad age range (1-15 years); average DSC and OC were 0.84 ± 0.05 and 0.90 ± 0.05, respectively. The average percent difference between reconstructed and ground truth mean heart doses was 4.2%. In the cohort dosimetry analysis, dose and dose-volume metrics were approximately 10% lower on average when the enhanced heart model was used for dose reconstructions. CONCLUSION We successfully developed and validated an anatomically realistic age-scalable cardiac model that can be used to establish substructure dose-response models for late cardiac disease in childhood cancer survivor cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suman Shrestha
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Aashish C Gupta
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - James E Bates
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, United States
| | - Choonsik Lee
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, United States
| | - Constance A Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, United States
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, United States
| | - Susan A Smith
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Ying Qiao
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Rita E Weathers
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Yutaka Yasui
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
| | - Laurence E Court
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Chelsea C Pinnix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States
| | - Stephen F Kry
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - David S Followill
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States
| | - Gregory T Armstrong
- Department of Epidemiology and Cancer Control, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, United States
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, United States; The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yeom YS, Griffin K, Mille M, Jung JW, Lee C, Lee C. A dose voxel kernel method for rapid reconstruction of out-of-field neutron dose of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:175015. [PMID: 32726766 PMCID: PMC10182832 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abaa5f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Monte Carlo (MC) radiation transport methods are used for dose calculation as 'gold standard.' However, the method is computationally time-consuming and thus impractical for normal tissue dose reconstructions for the large number of proton therapy patients required for epidemiologic investigations of late health effects. In the present study, we developed a new dose calculation method for the rapid reconstruction of out-of-field neutron dose to patients undergoing pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy. The new dose calculation method is based on neutron dose voxel kernels (DVKs) generated by MC simulations of a proton pencil beam irradiating a water phantom (60 × 60 × 300 cm3), which was conducted using a MC proton therapy simulation code, TOPAS. The DVKs were generated for 19 beam energies (from 70 to 250 MeV with the 10 MeV interval) and three range shifter thicknesses (1, 3, and 5 cm). An in-house program was written in C++ to superimpose the DVKs onto a patient CT images according to proton beam characteristics (energy, position, and direction) available in treatment plans. The DVK dose calculation method was tested by calculating organ/tissue-specific neutron doses of 1- and 5-year-old whole-body computational phantoms where intracranial and craniospinal irradiations were simulated. The DVK-based doses generally showed reasonable agreement with those calculated by direct MC simulations with a detailed PBS model that were previously published, with differences mostly less than 30% and 10% for the intracranial and craniospinal irradiations, respectively. The computation time of the DVK method for one patient ranged from 1 to 30 min on a single CPU core of a personal computer, demonstrating significant improvement over the direct MC dose calculation requiring several days on high-performance computing servers. Our DVK-based dose calculation method will be useful when dosimetry is needed for the large number of patients such as for epidemiologic or clinical research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Soo Yeom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yeom YS, Kuzmin G, Griffin K, Mille M, Polf J, Langner U, Jung JW, Lee C, Ellis D, Shin J, Lee C. A Monte Carlo model for organ dose reconstruction of patients in pencil beam scanning (PBS) proton therapy for epidemiologic studies of late effects. JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 2020; 40:225-242. [PMID: 31509813 PMCID: PMC10065358 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6498/ab437d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Significant efforts such as the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) involving multiple proton therapy centers have been made to conduct collaborative studies evaluating outcomes following proton therapy. As a groundwork dosimetry effort for the late effect investigation, we developed a Monte Carlo (MC) model of proton pencil beam scanning (PBS) to estimate organ/tissue doses of pediatric patients at the Maryland Proton Treatment Center (MPTC), one of the proton centers involved in the PPCR. The MC beam modeling was performed using the TOPAS (TOol for PArticle Simulation) MC code and commissioned to match measurement data within 1% for range, and 0.3 mm for spot sizes. The established MC model was then tested by calculating organ/tissue doses for sample intracranial and craniospinal irradiations on whole-body pediatric computational human phantoms. The simulated dose distributions were compared with the treatment planning system dose distributions, showing the 3 mm/3% gamma index passing rates of 94%-99%, validating our simulations with the MC model. The calculated organ/tissue doses per prescribed doses for the craniospinal irradiations (1 mGy Gy-1 to 1 Gy Gy-1) were generally much higher than those for the intracranial irradiations (2.1 μGy Gy-1 to 0.1 Gy Gy-1), which is due to the larger field coverage of the craniospinal irradiations. The largest difference was observed at the adrenal dose, i.e. ∼3000 times. In addition, the calculated organ/tissue doses were compared with those calculated with a simplified MC model, showing that the beam properties (i.e. spot size, spot divergence, mean energy, and energy spread) do not significantly influence dose calculations despite the limited irradiation cases. This implies that the use of the MC model commissioned to the MPTC measurement data might be dosimetrically acceptable for patient dose reconstructions at other proton centers particularly when their measurement data are unavailable. The developed MC model will be used to reconstruct organ/tissue doses for MPTC pediatric patients collected in the PPCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Soo Yeom
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20850, United States of America
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|