1
|
Muhanna N, Eu D, Chan HH, Daly M, Fricke IB, Douglas CM, Townson JL, Zheng J, Allen C, Jaffray DA, Irish JC. Assessment of a liposomal CT/optical contrast agent for image-guided head and neck surgery. NANOMEDICINE-NANOTECHNOLOGY BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE 2020; 32:102327. [PMID: 33220507 DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2020.102327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2020] [Revised: 10/06/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
This study evaluates a long-acting liposomal fluorescence / CT dual-modality contrast agent (CF800) in head and neck cancer to enhance intraoperative tumor demarcation with fluorescence imaging and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). CF800 was administered to 12 buccal cancer-bearing rabbits. Imaging was acquired at regular time points to quantify time-dependent contrast enhancement. Surgery was performed 5-7 days after, with intraoperative near-infrared fluorescence endoscopy and CBCT, followed by histological and ex-vivo fluorescence assessment. Tumor enhancement on CT was significant at 24, 96 and 120 hours. Volumetric analysis of tumor segmentation showed high correlation between CBCT and micro-CT. Fluorescence signal was apparent in both ex-vivo and in-vivo imaging. Histological correlation showed [100%] specificity for primary tumor. Sensitivity and specificity of CF800 in detecting nodal involvement require further investigation.CF800 is long acting and has dual function for CT and fluorescence contrast, making it an excellent candidate for image-guided surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nidal Muhanna
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Donovan Eu
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Harley Hl Chan
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Daly
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Inga B Fricke
- University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Catriona M Douglas
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jason L Townson
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jinzi Zheng
- University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Christine Allen
- University of Toronto, Pharmaceutical Sciences, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David A Jaffray
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; University of Toronto, Departments of Radiation Oncology and Medical Biophysics, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan C Irish
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, TECHNA Institute, Guided Therapeutic (GTx) Program, Toronto, ON, Canada.; Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery-Surgical Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre/University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada..
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meng B, Folaron MR, Strawbridge RR, Sadeghipour N, Samkoe KS, Tichauer K, Davis SC. Noninvasive quantification of target availability during therapy using paired-agent fluorescence tomography. Am J Cancer Res 2020; 10:11230-11243. [PMID: 33042280 PMCID: PMC7532673 DOI: 10.7150/thno.45273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Immuno-oncological treatment strategies that target abnormal receptor profiles of tumors are an increasingly important feature of cancer therapy. Yet, assessing receptor availability (RA) and drug-target engagement, important determinants of therapeutic efficacy, is challenging with current imaging strategies, largely due to the complex nonspecific uptake behavior of imaging agents in tumors. Herein, we evaluate whether a quantitative noninvasive imaging approach designed to compensate for nonspecific uptake, MRI-coupled paired-agent fluorescence tomography (MRI-PAFT), is capable of rapidly assessing the availability of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in response to one dose of anti-EGFR antibody therapy in orthotopic brain tumor models. Methods: Mice bearing orthotopic brain tumor xenografts with relatively high EGFR expression (U251) (N=10) or undetectable human EGFR (9L) (N=9) were considered in this study. For each tumor type, mice were either treated with one dose of cetuximab, or remained untreated. All animals were scanned using MRI-PAFT, which commenced immediately after paired-agent administration, and values of RA were recovered using a model-based approach, which uses the entire dynamic sequence of agent uptake, as well as a simplified “snapshot” approach which requires uptake measurements at only two time points. Recovered values of RA were evaluated between groups and techniques. Hematoxylin & eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemical (IHC) staining was performed on tumor specimens from every animal to confirm tumor presence and EGFR status. Results: In animals bearing EGFR(+) tumors, a significant difference in RA values between treated and untreated animals was observed (RA = 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.61 ± 0.18, respectively, p=0.027), with an area under the curve - receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) value of 0.92. We did not observe a statistically significant difference in RA values between treated and untreated animals bearing EGFR(-) tumors (RA = 0.18 ± 0.19 and 0.27 ± 0.21, respectively; p = 0.89; AUC-ROC = 0.55), nor did we observe a difference between treated EGFR(+) tumors compared to treated and untreated EGFR(-) tumors. Notably, the snapshot paired-agent strategy quantified drug-receptor engagement within just 30 minutes of agent administration. Examination of the targeted agent alone showed no capacity to distinguish tumors either by treatment or receptor status, even 24h after agent administration. Conclusions: This study demonstrated that a noninvasive imaging strategy enables rapid quantification of receptor availability in response to therapy, a capability that could be leveraged in preclinical drug development, patient stratification, and treatment monitoring.
Collapse
|